Parliament ropes in soldiers as clerks embark on strike
News

Information reaching this publication shows that Parliament was forced to enlist the services of Botswana Defence Force (BDF) officers after the National Assembly staff embarked on a strike action during the just ended Parliament session.
It is understood that Parliament staff which makes it easy for Members of Parliament to do their work went on a strike during the session of the just ended winter Parliament.
Parliament staff accused the management of reneging on an agreement to pay them commuted allowances at the height of the covid-19 pandemic, according to documents seen by this publication.
According a memorandum from Parliament addressed to staff, dated 3rd September 2021 entitled “overtime allowance initiatives” employees were “advised that just like government departments, the national assembly is facing serious financial challenges, a situation exacerbated by current covid-19 pandemic.”
“We are therefore expected to put in place overtime management, among other saving initiatives,” the document says.
“It is against this background that staff members are informed that effective 1st August 2021, overtime for all graduates, with exception of drivers and those on A grade will be paid 50% in monetary terms and 50% day offs in lieu of overtime,” the document adds. But it appears that the message from this memorandum, some staff at Parliament continued to report for duty beyond and even worked beyond normal hours, hence accumulating overtime in the process.
The documents also indicate that Parliament staff wrote several letters to the National Assembly management demanding “to be paid overtime arrears starting from July 2021 and 100% overtime with immediate effect.”
In response to the staff’s grievances, in a letter dated 31st August, Parliament informed the employees that “reference is made to your letter dated 7th June 2023 and subsequent follow up letters dated 4th July 2023 and 22nd August 2023 on the above subjects heading.”
The letter added that; “Please note that payment of overtime allowance in monetary terms and in day offs in lieu of overtime ae both recognised as compensation for overtime worked. General Orders 75, provides that overtime allowance is payable where the nature of an officer’s duties is such that he/she is required to work regular periods of overtime and where it is not practical to grant him/her time off to make up for the overtime worked.”
The letter also indicated that “As it is the case in other Government Departments, the National Assembly is faced with competing financial needs, hence the need to put in place overtime management, among other cost saving initiatives.”
It further stated that “You cited section 31 of the Public Service Act in reference to parts VIII and XII of the employment Act which highlight more on rest periods, hours of work, holidays and employment of females and issues related to confinement and maternity leave. Rest periods would in the case of government service include Saturdays, Sundays and Public holidays.”
The management of Parliament also “You have also highlighted procedures of section 94 of the employment Act that, “any employee who works during a rest period either by agreement with the employer or on being required to do so under section 95, shall be paid at least double the wages he would have been paid had he the period been an ordinary working period, or at his option be granted a day or day offs…”
The letter states that “This should be the case and in recommendation your overtime work for approval, your supervisors should indicate this.”
“The above, notwithstanding, you may recall that as per Memorandum dated 3rdSeptember 2021, you were duly advised of the need to utilize the day offs initiative to address the escalating overtime expenditure,” says the letter adding that “You were further advised on 2nd November 2021, that …All overtime should be signed for before it is worked.”
The management of Parliament indicated that to facilitate that, “we continued to utilize authorization forms which are then recommended by your head of departments and authorised by their respective supervisors.”
“The use of these forms afford the employees an opportunity to opt to engage in overtime work and be remunerated in monetary form and day offs in line with General Orders 75.1,” the letter noted further indicating “This therefore negates the statement that you are still being paid 50% overtime against your will, because you would otherwise have opted not to fill forms and therefore not do any overtime work.”
Parliament also informed staff that, “Lastly on the issue of disparities of payment of overtime between the National Assembly and Ntlo ya Dikgosi, the matter will be addressed separately, as Secretary, Ntlo ya Dikgosi, forms part of the Executive Committee which made the decision to put in place overtime management initiatives.”
You may like

FaR Property Company (FPC) Limited, a property investment company listed on the Botswana Stock Exchange, has recently announced its exceptional financial results for the year 2023. The company’s property asset value has risen to P1.47 billion, up from P1.42 billion in the previous year.
FPC has a diverse portfolio of properties, including retail, commercial, industrial, and residential properties in Botswana, South Africa, and Zambia. The company owns a total of 186 properties, generating rental revenues from various sectors. In 2023, the company recorded rental revenues of P11 million from residential properties, P62 million from industrial properties, and P89 million from commercial properties. Overall, the company’s total revenues increased by 9% to P153 million, while profit before tax increased by 22% to P136 million, and operating profit increased by 11% to P139 million.
One notable achievement for FPC is the low vacancy rate across its properties, which stands at only 6%. This is particularly impressive considering the challenging trading environment. The company attributes this success to effective lease management and the leasing of previously vacant properties in South Africa. FPC’s management expressed satisfaction with the results, highlighting the resilience of the company in the face of ongoing macroeconomic challenges.
The increase in profit before tax can be attributed to both an increase in income and effective control of operating expenses. FPC managed to achieve these results with fewer employees, demonstrating the company’s efficiency. The headline earnings per linked unit also saw an improvement, reaching 26.92 thebe, higher than the previous year.
Looking ahead, FPC remains confident in its competitiveness and growth prospects. The company possesses a substantial land bank, which it plans to develop strategically as opportunities arise. FPC aims for managed growth, focusing on consumer-driven developments and ensuring the presence of supportive tenants. By maintaining this approach, the company believes it can sustainably grow its property portfolio and remain competitive in the market.
In terms of the macroeconomic environment, FPC noted that inflation rates are decreasing towards the 3% to 6% range approved by the Bank of Botswana. This is positive news for the company, as it hopes for further decreases in interest rates. However, the fluctuating fuel prices, influenced by global events such as the war in Ukraine and oil output reductions by Russia and other Middle Eastern countries, continue to impact businesses, including some of FPC’s tenants.
FPC’s property portfolio includes notable assets such as a shopping mall in Francistown with Choppies Hyper as the anchor tenant, Borogo Mall located on the A33 main road near the Kazungula ferry crossing, and various industrial and commercial properties in Gaborone leased to Choppies, Senn Foods, and Clover Botswana. The company also owns a shopping mall in Mafikeng and Rustenburg in South Africa.
The majority of FPC’s properties, 85%, are located in Botswana, followed by 12% in South Africa and 3% in Zambia. With its strong financial performance, competitive position, and strategic land bank, FPC is well-positioned for continued growth and success in the property market.

The Botswana Power Corporation (BPC) has taken a significant step towards diversifying its energy mix by signing a power purchase agreement with Sekaname Energy for the production of power from coal bed methane in Mmashoro village. This agreement marks a major milestone for the energy sector in Botswana as the country transitions from a coal-fired power generation system to a new energy mix comprising coal, gas, solar, and wind.
The CEO of BPC, David Kgoboko, explained that the Power Purchase Agreement is for a 6MW coal bed methane proof of concept project to be developed around Mmashoro village. This project aligns with BPC’s strategic initiatives to increase the proportion of low-carbon power generation sources and renewable energy in the energy mix. The use of coal bed methane for power generation is an exciting development as it provides a hybrid solution with non-dispatchable sources of generation like solar PV. Without flexible base-load generation, the deployment of non-dispatchable solar PV generation would be limited.
Kgoboko emphasized that BPC is committed to enabling the development of a gas supply industry in Botswana. Sekaname Energy, along with other players in the coal bed methane exploration business, is a key and strategic partner for BPC. The successful development of a gas supply industry will enable the realization of a secure and sustainable energy mix for the country.
The Minister of Minerals & Energy, Lefoko Moagi, expressed his support for the initiative by the private sector to develop a gas industry in Botswana. The country has abundant coal reserves, and the government fully supports the commercial extraction of coal bed methane gas for power generation. The government guarantees that BPC will purchase the generated electricity at reasonable tariffs, providing cash flow to the developers and enabling them to raise equity and debt funding for gas extraction development.
Moagi highlighted the benefits of developing a gas supply industry, including diversified primary energy sources, economic diversification, import substitution, and employment creation. He commended Sekaname Energy for undertaking a pilot project to prove the commercial viability of extracting coal bed methane for power generation. If successful, this initiative would unlock the potential of a gas production industry in Botswana.
Sekaname Energy CEO, Peter Mmusi, emphasized the multiple uses of natural gas and its potential to uplift Botswana’s economy. In addition to power generation, natural gas can be used for gas-to-liquids, compressed natural gas, and fertilizer production. Mmusi revealed that Sekaname has already invested $57 million in exploration and infrastructure throughout its resource area. The company plans to spend another $10-15 million for the initial 6MW project and aims to invest over $500 million in the future for a 90MW power plant. Sekaname’s goal is to assist BPC in becoming a net exporter of power within the region and to contribute to Botswana’s transition to cleaner energy production.
In conclusion, the power purchase agreement between BPC and Sekaname Energy for the production of power from coal bed methane in Mmashoro village is a significant step towards diversifying Botswana’s energy mix. This project aligns with BPC’s strategic initiatives to increase the proportion of low-carbon power generation sources and renewable energy. The government’s support for the development of a gas supply industry and the commercial extraction of coal bed methane will bring numerous benefits to the country, including economic diversification, import substitution, and employment creation. With the potential to become a net exporter of power and a cleaner energy producer, Botswana is poised to make significant strides in its energy sector.

It is not clear as to when, but before taking a festive break in few weeks’ time UDC leaders would have convened to address the ongoing deadlock surrounding constituency allocation in the negotiations for the 2024 elections. The leaders, Duma Boko of the UDC, Mephato Reggie Reatile of the BPF, and Ndaba Gaolathe of the AP, are expected to meet and discuss critical matters and engage in dialogue regarding the contested constituencies.
The negotiations hit a stalemate when it came to allocating constituencies, prompting the need for the leaders to intervene. Representatives from the UDC, AP, and BPF were tasked with negotiating the allocation, with Dr. Patrick Molotsi and Dr. Philip Bulawa representing the UDC, and Dr. Phenyo Butale and Wynter Mmolotsi representing the AP.
The leaders’ meeting is crucial in resolving the contentious issue of constituency allocation, which has caused tension among UDC members and potential candidates for the 2024 elections. After reaching an agreement, the leaders will engage with the members of each constituency to gauge their opinions and ensure that the decisions made are favored by the rank and file. This approach aims to avoid unnecessary costs and conflicts during the general elections.
One of the main points of contention is the allocation of Molepolole South, which the BNF is adamant about obtaining. In the 2019 elections, the UDC was the runner-up in Molepolole South, securing the second position in seven out of eight wards. Other contested constituencies include Metsimotlhabe, Kgatleng East and West, Mmadinare, Francistown East, Shashe West, Boteti East, and Lerala Maunatlala.
The criteria used for constituency allocation have also become a point of dispute among the UDC member parties. The issue of incumbency is particularly contentious, as the criterion for constituency allocation suggests that current holders of UDC’s council and parliamentary seats should be given priority for re-election without undergoing primary elections. Disadvantaged parties argue that this approach limits democratic competition and hinders the emergence of potentially more capable candidates.
Another disputed criterion is the allocation based on the strength and popularity of a party in specific areas. Parties argue that this is a subjective criterion that leads to disputes and favoritism, as clear metrics for strength and visibility cannot be defined. The BNF, in particular, questions the demands of the new entrants, the BPF and AP, as they lack a traceable track record to support their high expectations.
The unity and cohesion of the UDC are at stake, with the BPF and AP expressing dissatisfaction and considering withdrawing from the negotiations. Therefore, it is crucial for the leaders to expedite their meeting and find a resolution to these disputes.
In the midst of these negotiations, the BNF has already secured 15 constituencies within the UDC coalition. While the negotiations are still ongoing, BNF Chairman Dr. Molotsi revealed that they have traditionally held these constituencies and are expecting to add more to their tally. The constituencies include Gantsi North, Gantsi South, Kgalagadi North, Kgalagadi South, Good Hope – Mmathethe, Kanye North, Kanye South, Lobatse, Molepolole North, Gaborone South, Gaborone North, Gaborone Bonnignton North, Takatokwane, Letlhakeng, and Tlokweng.
The resolution of the contested constituencies will test the ability of the UDC to present a united front in the 2024 National Elections will depend on the decisions made by the three leaders. It is essential for them to demonstrate maturity and astuteness in resolving the constituency allocation deadlock and ensuring the cohesion of the UDC.