Moody’s latest outlook on African banks drew a picture of major local financial institutions as collateral for the Covid-19 sting that collapsed their associates in South Africa.
Among Moody’s publicly rated banks is Absa Group Limited South Africa, a parent to Absa Botswana and FirstRand Bank Limited South Africa, a mother to First National Bank Botswana. Absa Group South Africa with assets sanding at USD 90 143 million, carries a Ba3 rating with a negative outlook while FirstRand South Africa, with assets of USD 89 079 million has a Ba2 rating with a negative outlook too.
When analyzing the already dogged by recession and deteriorating and indebted South Africa, Moody’s had this to say: “Our outlook for the sector (South Africa) is negative. The coronavirus-related disruptions are exacerbating the already challenging operating conditions characterized by low growth and wide fiscal deficits.
For banks, we expect a rise in problem loans to over 7%-8% of gross loans, and a significant drop in profits due to higher provisions and a squeeze in margins. The migration of Stage 1 & 2 loans to riskier Stages 2 & 3 will lead to higher risk weighted assets and lower capital.
Despite depositors’ move to shorter duration products and banks’ reliance on institutional deposits, funding conditions remain stable and liquidity buffers resilient. A planned new banking resolution regime with bail-in features will be credit positive for senior creditors. Good risk management practices will support financial stability.”
In its 2021 Africa banks outlook, Moody’s says there is difficulty in operating conditions and banks’ close links with their respective sovereigns drive the negative outlook. Most African sovereigns like Botswana’s outlook has been negative since the outbreak of Covid-19 in the first quarter of 2020. Moody’s further says, loan quality, profitability and foreign-currency (FC) liquidity will be pressure points, but stable funding and capital will mitigate risks.
This is after Fitch said that weaker-rated Sub Sahara Africa nations may face higher funding costs than before the pandemic, which could discourage their return to markets. On Wednesday Moody’s outlined that there will be stress in African economies as operating conditions will remain difficult, as economic activity, consumer spending and investor confidence remain battered by the pandemic. The rating agency further stated that African sovereigns are heavily indebted and have limited capacity to absorb shocks.
Moody’s said banks’ creditworthiness is linked with deteriorating sovereign credit profiles through their large holdings of government securities. Governments’ capacity to provide support to troubled banks will also be impaired.
However, according to Moody’s, 2021 growth will recover modestly (to 3.3% for Moody’s-rated countries). But financial stability will be broadly maintained as stable local currency deposit funding, high liquidity in local currency, good capital buffers with the equity-to-assets ratio typically exceeding 9%-10%, and gradual improvements in risk management will help to contain the risks.
Moody’s says banks will be hurt via their links with governments as sovereign pressures will continue to weigh on banks’ credit profiles: economic slowdown hampers banks’ financial performance; government capacity to provide support is impaired; while banks are heavily invested in government securities and are hit by a drop in their value.
The African Banking sector will maintain its regional diversity. For example; Egyptian banks will be least impacted by the pandemic. While South African and Nigerian banks will face acute macro challenges, while loan quality and liquidity remain issues for Angolan and Tunisian banks, respectively. East African and Francophone West African banks are better placed than Central African banks given more resilient economies.
The pressure points will be NPLs, profits, FC liquidity and Moody’s researcher expect non-performing loans (NPLs) to potentially double from 2019 levels as payment holidays expire, while increased provisioning needs, reduced business generation and margin pressure erode profitability.
Partly dollarized systems like the oil rich Nigeria, Angola and Botswana’s diamond money reserves where foreign-currency revenues slumped, are more at risk of foreign exchange shortages. Furthermore, Moody’s said ESG and technology of increasing credit importance is on the forefront. The rating agency outlined the rising environmental risks which will increasingly affect overall economic performance and specific economic sectors, also impacting banks.
On the flip side of the gloom and doom, digital transformation provides exciting opportunities for the banking sector, primarily from rising financial inclusion, says Moody’s. Locally commercial banks have been lauded for their resilience amid covid-19 winds, despite banking stocks taking the biggest hit since March this year at the local bourse.
When looking at the Bank of Botswana Research Bulletin which was released on Monday, a study on ‘Market Structure and Performance in Botswana’s Banking Industry’ gave a positive outcome of a healthy local banking sector. The paper said the banking sector profitability does not raise any competition concerns as they are driven by adoption and use of organizational strategies and technologies that improve the efficiency rather than market power or its abuse.
Last week during the MPC press conference on Thursday, Bank of Botswana Deputy Governor, Kealeboga Shalaulo Masalila explained that the reason why banks were able to remain standing tall during tough times is because they are able to evaluate their processes, their loan books are sound and they strive to expand their income, especially from the interest income to digitalization. He further lauded banks marketing strategies that makes them attractive to customers.
Here is how one Permanent Secretary encapsulates the clear tension between democracy and bureaucracy in Botswana: “President Mokgweetsi Masisi’s Government is behaving like a state surrounded with armed forces in order to capture it or force its surrender. The situation has turned so volatile, for tomorrow is not guaranteed for us top civil servants.
These are the painful results of a personalized civil service in our view as permanent secretaries”. Although his deduction of the situation may be summed as sour grapes because he is one of the ‘victims’ of the reshuffle, he is convinced this is a perfect description of the rationale behind frequent changes and transfers characterising the current civil service.
The result of it all, he said, is that “there is too much instability at managerial and strategic levels of the civil service leading to a noticeable directionless civil service.” He continued: “Changes and transfers are inevitable in the civil service, but to a permissible scale and frequency. Think of soccer team coach who changes and transfers his entire squad every month; you know the consequences?”
The Tsunami has hit hard at critical departments and Ministries leaving a strong wave of uncertainty, many demoralised and some jobless. In traditional approaches to public administration, democracy gives the goals; and bureaucracy delivers the technical efficiency required for implementation. But the recent moves in the civil service are indicative of conflicting imperatives – the notion of separation between politicians and administrators is becoming blurred by the day.
“Look at what happened to Prisons and BDF where second in command were overlooked for outsiders, and these are the people who had sacrificially served for donkey’s years hoping for a seat at the ladder’s end. The frequency of the changes, at times affecting the same Ministry or individual also demonstrates some level of ineptitude, clumsiness and lack of foresight from those in charge,” remarked the PS who added that their view is that the transfers are not related to anything but “settling scores, creating corruption opportunities and pushing out perceived dissident and former president, Ian Khama’s alleged loyalists and most of these transfers are said to be products of intelligence detection.”
Partly blaming Khama for the mess and his unwillingness to let go, the PS dismissed Masisi for falling to the trap and failing to outgrow the destructive tiff. “Khama is here to stay and the sooner Masisi comes to terms with the fact that he (Masisi) is the state President, the better. For a President to still be making these changes and transfers signals signs of a confused man who has not yet started rolling his roadmap, if at all it was ever there. I am saying this because any roadmap comes with key players and policies,” he concluded.
The Ministry of Health and Wellness seems to be the most hard-hit by the transfers, having experienced three Permanent Secretaries changes within a year and a half. Insiders say the changes have everything to do with the Ministry being the centre of COVID-19 tenders and economic opportunities. “The buck stops with the PS and no right-thinking PS can just allow glaring corruption under his watch as an accounting officer. Technocrats are generally law abiding, the pressure comes with politically appointed leaders racing against political terms to loot,” revealed a director in the Ministry preferring anonymity.
The latest transfer of Kabelo Ebineng she says was also motivated by his firm attitude against the President’s blue-eyed Task Team boys. “The Task Team wants to own the COVID-19 pandemic and government interventions and always cry foul when the Ministry reasserts itself as mandated by law,” said the director who added that Masisi who was always caught between the crossfire decided on sacrificing Ebineng to the joy of his team as they (Task Team) were in the habit of threatening to resign citing Ebineng as the problem.
Ebineng joins the Office of the President as a deputy Coordinator (government implementation and coordination office).The incoming PS is the soft-spoken Grace Muzila, known and described by her close associates as a conformist albeit knowledgeable.
One of the losers in the grand scheme is Thato Raphaka who many had seen as the next PSP because of his experience and calm demeanour following a declaration of interest in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Secretary post by the current PSP, Elias Magosi.
But hardly ten months into his post, Raphaka has been transferred out to the National Strategy Office in what many see as a demotion of some sort. Other notable changes coming into OP are Pearl Ramokoka formerly with the Employment, Labour and Productivity Ministry coming in as a Permanent Secretary and Kgomotso Abi as director of Public Service Reforms.
One of the ousted senior officers in the Office of the President warned that there are no signs that the changes and transfers will stop anytime soon: “If you are observant you would have long noticed that the changes don’t only affect senior officers but government decisions as well. A decision is made today and the government backtracks on it within a week. Not only that, the President says this today, and his deputy denies it the following day in Parliament,” he warned.
Some observers have blamed the turmoil in the civil service partly to lack of accountable presidential advisers or kitchen cabinet properly schooled on matters of statecraft. They point out that politicians or those peripheral to them should refrain from hampering the technical and organizational activities of public managers – or else the party (reshuffling) won’t stop.
In the view expressed by some Permanent Secretaries, Elias Magosi, has not really been himself since joining the civil service; and has cut a picture of indifference in most critical engagements; the most notable been a permanent secretaries platform which he chairs. As things stand there is need to reconcile the imperatives of democracy and democracy in Botswana. Peace will rein only when public value should stand astride the fault that runs between politicians and public managers.
Former Permanent Secretary to the President, Carter Morupisi, is fighting for survival in a matter in which the State has charged him and his wife, Pinnie Morupisi, with corruption and money laundering.
Morupisi has joined a list of prominent figures that served in the previous administration and who have been accused of corruption during their tenure in office. While others have been emerging victorious, Morupisi is yet to find that luck. The High Court recently dismissed his no case to answer application.
United States President, Joe Biden, is faced with a decision to make relating to the Covid-19 vaccine intellectual property after 175 former world leaders and Nobel laurates joined the campaign urging the US to take “urgent action” to suspend intellectual property rights for Covid-19 vaccines to help boost global inoculation rates.
According to the world leaders, doing so would allow developing countries to make their own copies of the vaccines that have been developed by pharmaceutical companies without fear of being sued for intellectual property infringements.
“A WTO waiver is a vital and necessary step to bringing an end to this pandemic. It must be combined with ensuring vaccine know-how and technology is shared openly,” the signatories, comprising more than 100 Nobel prize-winners and over 70 former world leaders, wrote in a letter to US President Joe Biden, according to Financial Times.
A measure to allow countries to temporarily override patent rights for Covid related medical products was proposed at the World Trade Organization by India and South Africa in October, and has since been backed by nearly 60 countries.
Former leaders who signed the letter included Gordon Brown, former UK Prime Minister; François Hollande, former French President; Mikhail Gorbachev, former President of the USSR; and Yves Leterme, former Belgian Prime Minister.
In their official communication, South Africa and India said: “As new diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines for Covid-19 are developed, there are significant concerns [about] how these will be made available promptly, in sufficient quantities and at affordable prices to meet global demand.”
While developed countries have been able to secure enough vaccine to inoculate their citizens, developing countries such as Botswana are struggling to source enough to swiftly vaccine their citizens, something which world leaders believe it would work against global recovery therefore proving counter-productive.
Since the availability of vaccines, Botswana has been able to secure only 60 000 doses of vaccines, 30 000 as donation as from the Indian government, while the other 30 000 was sourced through COVAX facility. Canada, has pre-ordered vaccines in surplus and it will be able to vaccinate each of its citizens six times over. In the UK and US, it is four vaccines per person; and two each in the EU and Australia.
For vaccines produced in Europe, developing countries are forced to pay double what European countries are paying, making it more expensive for already financially struggling economies. European countries however justify the price of vaccines and that they deserve to buy them cheap since they contributed in their development.
It is evident that vaccines cannot be made available immediately to all countries worldwide with wealthy economies being the only success story in that regard, something that has been referred to as a “catastrophic moral failure”, head of the World Health Organisation (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
The challenge facing developing countries is not only the price, but also the capacity of vaccine manufactures to be able to do so to meet global demand within a short time. The proposal for a patent waiver by India and South Africa has been rejected by developed countries, known for hosting the world leading pharmaceutical companies such US, European Union, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.
According to the Financial Times, US business groups including pharmaceutical industry representatives, have urged Biden to resist supporting a waiver to IP rules at the WTO, arguing that the proposal led by India and South Africa was too “vague” and “broad”.
The individuals who signed the letter, including Nobel laureates in economics as well as from across the arts and sciences, warned that inequitable vaccine access would impact the global economy and prevent it from recovering.
“The world saw unprecedented development of safe and effective vaccines, in major part thanks to US public investment,” the group wrote. “We all welcome that vaccination rollout in the US and many wealthier countries is bringing hope to their citizens.”
“Yet for the majority of the world that same hope is yet to be seen. New waves of suffering are now rising across the globe. Our global economy cannot rebuild if it remains vulnerable to this virus.” The group warned that fully enforcing IP was “self-defeating for the US” as it hindered global vaccination efforts. “Given artificial global supply shortages, the US economy already risks losing $1.3tn in gross domestic product this year.”