Connect with us
Advertisement
[spt-posts-ticker]
Saturday, 20 April 2024

Covid-19 Response: Why Should a Financially Robust Debswana Cry Wolf?

Columns

The great Roman Stoic philosopher, statesman, dramatist, and satirist Seneca once said, “Whatever we give to the wretched, we lend to our own fortune”. Are individuals or institutions of substance of our day heedful of this altruistic moral? Are their acts of benefaction no more than a PR stunt?
[ihc-hide-content ihc_mb_type=”show” ihc_mb_who=”1,2,3″ ihc_mb_template=”1″ ]

I am prompted to so loudly wonder after having noted to my utter dismay that the establishments at the forefront of Botswana’s mining industry are sending mixed signals in certain respects.

Toward the end of April 2020, Debswana issued a press release   announcing that it had committed to a P24 million spend on Covid-19 preparedness, with about 60 percent of the voted sum already outlayed.

Now, if a report in a local Sunday paper is anything to go by, the real dispenser of the funds is to my understanding not Debswana but De Beers. It turns out De Beers shelled out P20 million toward the Covid-19 response.

It also emerges that De Beers is set to recoup this very noble item of expenditure from Debswana’s and its own workforce by way of proportional salary cuts – a classic case of robbing poor Peter (the hapless workers) to pay Paul (Covid-19-related interventions).

What sort of games are these maestro players in the economy of Botswana playing with the nation?

BOTSWANA’S DUAL STAKE IN COMPLEMENTARY OUTFITS

Maybe a rejigging of the reader’s memory in relation to the stakeholding setup in the three interlacing companies, namely De Beers, Anglo-American, and Debswana is in order before I labour the point further.

I will begin with Debswana, the nation’s flagship money spinner. This is a joint venture between the Botswana government and De Beers which dates back to 1969, when it was known as De Beers Botswana Mining Company.  The ownership proportions have been split evenly between the two since 1975. Prior to the present 50-50 arrangement, our government had a 15 percent stake in the joint venture, which as of the year 1992 has been known as Debswana Diamond Company (Pty) Ltd, or Debswana in short.

De Beers is majority owned by Anglo American, to the tune of 85 percent.  The Botswana government has a 15 percent shareholding in the London-based company, which it garnered in 2004. Until 2001, the Botswana government held only 5 percent of De Beers through Debswana, which it upped to 10 percent that year.

In 2012, an opportunity presented itself for our government to escalate its stake in De Beers to 25 percent at the asking price of $1.3 billon (about P9.5 billion at the exchange rate prevailing at the time) but in a move that was not sufficiently unpacked before the nation, government declined for one reason or another, as a result of which a great opportunity to turbo-boost citizen economic empowerment by acquiring the extra shares, listing them on the Botswana Stock Exchange,  and restricting their purchase to individual Batswana or wholly-citizen-owned companies went begging.

With the Botswana government having passed up the chance to raise its stake in De Beers in 2012, Anglo American seized on the waiver and paid the exiting Oppenheimer family $5.2 billion to almost double its existing stake of 45 percent (which it had since 2001, previous to which it had only 32 percent) to 85 percent.

According to the Anglo American issue capital register as of March 2020, up to 70 percent of Anglo American is owned by Anglo South Africa. The full particulars about Anglo South Africa are hard to find online but it is in all probability controlled by the 66-year-old, British-born Indian going by the name Anil Agarwal through his company Volcan Holdings Plc. Agarwal not too long ago was the largest unitary shareholder in the dual-listed Anglo American (both on the London Stock Exchange and the Johannesburg Stock Exchange) with a stake of just under 20 percent. There has not been any report suggesting that he traded away his shares.

OPPENHEIMER SHADOW STILL LINGERS

Of course a discussion of the diamond industry would never be complete without significant allusion to the Oppenheimers, who were pivotal in transforming both Anglo American and De Beers into the blue chip behemoths they are today.

Although it was Cecil Rhodes who incepted De Beers in 1888, it was the Jewish German immigrant to South Africa, Ernest Oppenheimer, who exponentially increased its fortunes after he and the iconic American financier JP Morgan formed Anglo in 1917 and took control of De Beers ten years down the road.

Since then, and until 2004, De Beers and Anglo American – virtual Siamese twins for more than 80 years – have been steered by a dynasty spanning three generations from Ernest to Harry to Nicky Oppenheimer. At one stage, the two companies had cross-ownership, with Anglo holding a 32 percent stake in De Beers and De Beers owning 35.4 percent of Anglo.

Nicky was deputy chairman of Anglo American and Chairman of De Beers for about a dozen years before he bowed out in February 2011 and October 2012 respectively. Not even his only child and heir Jonathan features on the boards of the two companies.

Today, the Oppenheimers professedly have no stake in De Beers and are said to own less than 1 percent of Anglo American. That, at any rate, is the public domain version of things. The real truth, however, must lie behind the drapes, for it defies common sense that the Oppenheimers exited two breathtakingly buoyant business concerns which may still be in good economic nick for another 20 years or so.

At the time Nicky offloaded his shareholding in De Beers for one, it was valued at $18.7 billion, with the number crunching market watchers positing that it was in fact under-valued by 30 percent.

True, the Oppenheimers do not need De Beers or Anglo American as they are so broadly diversified they practically have a finger in every pie. Legend has it they control more than 40 percent of the JSE. Nicky for one is Africa’s richest man, with a net worth of $7.4 billion according to the Forbes Rich List. He is   196th in the global wealth pantheon.

Given the tendency of plutocrats to keep sperm banks with a view to siring children secretively so as to ensure every economic base is covered in the fullness of time, it is not entirely baseless to contend that Nicky still calls the shots in both DeBeers and Anglo American through proxy shareholders or kinsmen going by names which are not easy to associate with his. He or one of his companies may as well be a principal shareholder in the opaque Anglo South Africa.

GOVERNMENT MUST HELP RAISE BOTSWANA’S OWN OPPENHEIMERS

In March this year, Nick Oppenheimer wrote out a R1 billion cheque as his personal contribution to South Africa’s Solidarity Fund in the Fight Against Covid-19. A few days later, his sister Mary and her four daughters followed suit, they too pledging a further R1 billon to the same cause as a collective.

Two other filthy-rich compatriots of Nicky, namely Patrick Motsepe and Johann Rupert, stepped forward too and like Nicky pledged R1 billion apiece in the same Covid-19 context.

Throughout the entire time span Nick was directly associated with Debswana, he never made a single one personal philanthropic contribution to Botswana of half the magnitude of the financial boost to his own country’s Covid-19 fight.

If there’s one country that deserves the lion’s share of corporate citizenship from the Oppenheimer coffers, it is Botswana, which is arguably responsible for the bulk of their seamless fortune.

In 2019, for instance, we were the source of 86 percent (or $3.5 billion in absolute terms) of De Beers’ revenue. We also boast Jwaneng Mine, the world’s most profitable mine which was reckoned to contain proven and probable diamond reserves of 166.6 million carats as of December 2018.

But the Oppenheimers are South Africans first and foremost and therefore philanthropic allegiance is weighted in favour of that country. This partiality must serve as a wake-up call to the Masisi administration,  who should redouble their efforts toward economically empowering indigenous Batswana as we too would love to have our own Oppenheimers who can pop out enormous sums for national social safety net purposes  without their bank balances being dented in the slightest.

Certainly, it does not reflect that favourably on our leaders who preceded Masisi that in over half a century of independence, they were unable to produce one single indigenous billionaire even in Pula terms.

Imagine if the likes of Samuel Mpuchane, Charles Tibone, and Patrick Balopi were dollar-hedged multimillionaires! Needless to say, government would not have to singly or preponderantly take the Covid-19 response tab.

It is a pity that in Botswana, money is directed towards people of a certain hue, whether they be foreigners or citizens. Kagiso Mmusi, for instance, put up a plush, imposing multi-storey edifice somewhere in Kgale View’s Millennium Park, but government saw no need to rent it lest he resultantly amass a mighty fortune and leave fellow Batswana in the dust.

On the other hand, the structures owned by the hyphenated, fairer-skinned Batswana are invariably snapped up by government whilst they are on the drawing board! This unashamedly selective crab mentality makes it infinitely difficult for indigenous entrepreneurs to assume their ranks among the true big shots of Botswana.

IS DEBSWANA REALLY CASH-STRAPPED?

That brings me back to the puzzlement I registered in the opening section of this piece. If government owns 50 percent of Debswana and 15 percent of De Beers, it has reasonable enough clout to intervene and deter management in these two organisations from making a mountain out of the molehill that is their Covid-19 contributions by making their workers recompense them for the expenditure.

Whatever sum they spent or are in the process of spending must be treated as a sunk cost, as all monetary charity gestures ought to be.    After all, expenditures on charity are tax deductible and so they are automatically recouped in the expense section of the income statement.

I also wonder why Debswana cannot dip into its own cash stash for the Covid-19 imperative but instead has to bow and scrape with cap in hand before De Beers in this connection.

True, Debswana is going through a rough financial patch at this juncture in the face of the satan pandemic considering that it is wholly responsible for stalling the company’s revenue stream thanks to the consequent globalwide lockdowns, but it must surely have substantial reserves in which it could tap for just this contingency.

If all of a sudden Debswana is verging on impecuniousness, then its posse of “chartered” bean counters have been sleeping on the job all along and ought to be shown the door once and for all, period.

[/ihc-hide-content]

Continue Reading

Columns

GONE FISHING

28th March 2023

In recent years, using personal devices in working environments has become so commonplace it now has its own acronym, BOYD (Bring Your Own Device).  But as employees skip between corporate tools and personal applications on their own devices, their actions introduce a number of possible risks that should be managed and mitigated with careful consideration.  Consider these examples:

Si-lwli, a small family-run business in Wales, is arguably as niche a company as you could find, producing talking toys used to promote the Welsh language. Their potential market is small, with only some 300,000 Welsh language speakers in the world and in reality the business is really more of a hobby for the husband-and-wife team, who both still have day jobs.  Yet, despite still managing to be successful in terms of sales, the business is now fighting for survival after recently falling prey to cybercriminals. Emails between Si-Iwli and their Chinese suppliers were intercepted by hackers who altered the banking details in the correspondence, causing Si-Iwli to hand over £18,000 (around P ¼ m) to the thieves. That might not sound much to a large enterprise, but to a small or medium business it can be devastating.

Another recent SMB hacking story which appeared in the Wall Street Journal concerned Innovative Higher Ed Consulting (IHED) Inc, a small New York start-up with a handful of employees. IHED didn’t even have a website, but fraudsters were able to run stolen credit card numbers through the company’s payment system and reverse the charges to the tune of $27,000, around the same loss faced by Si-Iwli.  As the WSJ put it, the hackers completely destroyed the company, forcing its owners to fold.

And in May 2019, the city of Baltimore’s computer system was hit by a ransomware attack, with hackers using a variant called RobinHood. The hack, which has lasted more than a month, paralysed the computer system for city employees, with the hackers demanding a payment in Bitcoin to give access back to the city.

Of course, hackers target governments or business giants  but small and medium businesses are certainly not immune. In fact, 67% of SMBs reported that they had experienced a cyber attack across a period of 12 months, according to a 2018 survey carried out by security research firm Ponemon Institute. Additionally, Verizon issued a report in May 2019 that small businesses accounted for 43% of its reported data breaches.  Once seen as less vulnerable than PCs, smartphone attacks are on the rise, with movements like the Dark Caracal spyware campaign underlining the allure of mobile devices to hackers. Last year, the US Federal Trade Commission released a statement calling for greater education on mobile security, coming at a time when around 42% of all Android devices are believed to not carry the latest security updates.

This is an era when employees increasingly use their smartphones for work-related purposes so is your business doing enough to protect against data breaches on their employees’ phones? The SME Cyber Crime Survey 2018 carried out for risk management specialists AON showed that more than 80% of small businesses did not view this as a threat yet if as shown, 67% of SMBs were said to have been victims of hacking, either the stats are wrong or business owners are underestimating their vulnerability.  A 2019 report by PricewaterhouseCoopers suggests the latter, stating that the majority of global businesses are unprepared for cyber attacks.

Consider that a workstation no longer means a desk in an office: It can be a phone in the back of a taxi or Uber; a laptop in a coffee shop, or a tablet in an airport lounge.  Wherever the device is used, employees can potentially install applications that could be harmful to your business, even from something as seemingly insignificant as clicking on an accidental download or opening a link on a phishing email.  Out of the physical workplace, your employees’ activities might not have the same protections as they would on a company-monitored PC.

Yet many businesses not only encourage their employees to work remotely, but assume working from coffee shops, bookstores, and airports can boost employees’ productivity.  Unfortunately, many remote hot spots do not provide secure Wi-Fi so if your employee is accessing their work account on unsecured public Wi-Fi,  sensitive business data could be at risk. Furthermore, even if your employee uses a company smartphone or has access to company data through a personal mobile device, there is always a chance data could be in jeopardy with a lost or stolen device, even information as basic as clients’ addresses and phone numbers.

BOYDs are also at risk from malware designed to harm and infect the host system, transmittable to smartphones when downloading malicious third-party apps.  Then there is ransomware, a type of malware used by hackers to specifically take control of a system’s data, blocking access or threatening to release sensitive information unless a ransom is paid such as the one which affected Baltimore.  Ransomware attacks are on the increase,  predicted to occur every 14 seconds, potentially costing billions of dollars per year.

Lastly there is phishing – the cyber equivalent of the metaphorical fishing exercise –  whereby  cybercriminals attempt to obtain sensitive data –usernames, passwords, credit card details –usually through a phoney email designed to look legitimate which directs the user to a fraudulent website or requests the data be emailed back directly. Most of us like to think we could recognize a phishing email when we see it, but these emails have become more sophisticated and can come through other forms of communication such as messaging apps.

Bottom line is to be aware of the potential problems with BOYDs and if in doubt,  consult your IT security consultants.  You can’t put the own-device genie back in the bottle but you can make data protection one of your three wishes!

Continue Reading

Columns

“I Propose to Diana Tonight”

28th March 2023

About five days before Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed landed in Paris, General Atiku, a certain Edward Williams was taking a walk in a woods in the Welsh town of Mountain Ash. Williams, then 73, was a psychic of some renown. He had in the past foretold assassination attempts on US President Ronald Reagan, which occurred on March 30, 1981, and Pope John Paul II, which came to pass on May 13, 1981.

As he trudged the woods, Williams  had a sudden premonition that pointed to Diana’s imminent fate as per Christopher Andersen’s book The Day Diana Died. “When the vision struck me, it was as if everything around me was obscured and replaced by shadowy figures,” Williams was later to reminisce. “In the middle was the face of Princess Diana. Her expression was sad and full of pathos. She was wearing what looked like a floral dress with a short dark cardigan. But it was vague. I went cold with fear and knew it was a sign that she was in danger.”

Williams hastily beat a retreat to his home, which he shared with his wife Mary, and related to her his presentiment, trembling like an aspen leaf as he did so. “I have never seen him so upset,” Mary recounted. “He felt he was given a sign and when he came back from his walk he was deeply shaken.”

The following day, Williams frantically sauntered into a police station to inform the police of his premonition. The officer who attended to him would have dismissed him as no more than a crackpot but he treated him seriously in view of the accuracy of his past predictions. He  took a statement and immediately passed it on to the Special Branch Investigative  Unit.

The report read as follows:

“On 27 August, at 14:12 hrs, a man by the name of Edward Williams came to Mountain Ash police station. He said he was a psychic and predicted that Princess Diana was going to die. In previous years, he has predicted that the Pope and Ronald Reagan were going to be the victims of assassination attempts. On both occasions he was proved to be correct. Mr Williams appeared to be quite normal.”

Williams, General, was spot-on as usual: four days later, the princess was no more.

Meanwhile, General,  even as Dodi and Diana were making their way to the Fayed-owned Ritz Hotel in central Paris, British newspapers were awash with headlines that suggested Diana was kind of deranged. Writes Andrew Morton in Diana in Pursuit of Love: “In The Independent Diana was described as ‘a woman with fundamentally nothing to say about anything’. She was ‘suffering from a form of arrested development’. ‘Isn’t it time she started using her head?’ asked The Mail on Sunday. The Sunday Mirror printed a special supplement entitled ‘A Story of Love’; The News of the World claimed that William had demanded that Diana should split from Dodi: ‘William can’t help it, he just doesn’t like the man.’ William was reportedly ‘horrified’ and ‘doesn’t think Mr Fayed is good for his mother’ – or was that just the press projecting their own prejudices? The upmarket Sunday Times newspaper, which had first serialised my biography of the princess, now put her in the psychiatrist’s chair for daring to be wooed by a Muslim. The pop-psychologist Oliver James put Diana ‘On the Couch’, asking why she was so ‘depressed’ and desperate for love. Other tabloids piled in with dire prognostications – about Prince Philip’s hostility to the relationship, Diana’s prospect of exile, and the social ostracism she would face if she married Dodi.”

DIANA AND DODI AT THE RITZ

Before Diana and Dodi departed the Villa Windsor sometime after 16 hrs, General, one of Dodi’s bodyguards Trevor Rees-Jones furtively asked Diana as to what the programme for the evening was. This Trevor did out of sheer desperation as Dodi had ceased and desisted from telling members of his security detail, let alone anyone else for that matter, what his onward destination was for fear that that piece of information would be passed on to the paparazzi. Diana kindly obliged Trevor though her response was terse and scarcely revealing. “Well, eventually we will be going out to a restaurant”, that was all Diana said. Without advance knowledge of exactly what restaurant that was, Trevor and his colleagues’ hands were tied: they could not do a recce on it as was standard practice for the security team of a VIP principal.  Dodi certainly, General, was being recklessly by throwing such caution to the winds.

At about 16:30, Diana and Dodi drew up at the Ritz Hotel, where they were received by acting hotel manager Claude Roulet.  The front entrance of the hotel was already crawling with paparazzi, as a result of which the couple took the precaution of using the rear entrance, where hopefully they would make their entry unperturbed and unmolested. The first thing they did when they were ensconced in the now $10,000 a night Imperial Suite was to spend some time on their mobiles and set about touching base with friends, relations, and associates.  Diana called at least two people, her clairvoyant friend Rita Rogers and her favourite journalist Richard Kay of The Daily Mail.

Rita, General,  was alarmed that Diana had proceeded to venture to Paris notwithstanding the warning she had given Dodi and herself in relation to what she had seen of him  in the crystal ball when the couple had consulted her. When quizzed as to what the hell she indeed was doing in Paris at that juncture, Diana replied that she and Dodi had simply come to do some shopping, which though partially true was not the material reason they were there. “But Diana, remember what I told Dodi,” Rita said somewhat reprovingly. Diana a bit apprehensively replied, “Yes I remember. I will be careful. I promise.” Well,  she did not live up to her promise as we shall soon unpack General.

As for Richard Kay, Diana made known to him that, “I have decided I am going to radically change my life. I am going to complete my obligations to charities and to the anti-personnel land mines cause, but in November I want to completely withdraw from formal public life.”

Once she was done with her round of calls, Diana went down to the hair saloon by the hotel swimming pool to have her hair washed and blow-dried ahead of the scheduled evening dinner.

THE “TELL ME YES” RING IS DELIVERED

Since the main object of their Paris trip was to pick up the “Tell Me Yes” engagement ring  Dodi had ordered in Monte Carlo a week earlier, Dodi decided to check on Repossi Jewellery, which was right within the Ritz prencincts, known as the Place Vendome.  It could have taken less than a minute for Dodi to get to the store on foot but he decided to use a car to outsmart the paparazzi invasion. He was driven there by Trevor Rees-Jones, with Alexander Kez Wingfield and Claude Roulet following on foot, though he entered the shop alone.

The Repossi store had closed for the holiday season but Alberto Repossi, accompanied by his wife and brother-in-law,  had decided to travel all the way from his home in Monaco  and momentarily open it for the sake of the potentially highly lucrative  Dodi transaction.  Alberto, however, disappointed Dodi as the ring he had chosen was not the one  he produced. The one he showed Dodi was pricier and perhaps more exquisite but Dodi  was adamant that he wanted the exact one he had ordered as that was what Diana herself had picked. It was a ploy  on the part of Repossi to make a real killing on the sale, his excuse to that effect being that Diana deserved a ring tha was well worthy of her social pedigree.  With Dodi having expressed disaffection, Repossi rendered his apologies and assured Dodi he would make the right ring available shortly, whereupon Dodi repaired back to the hotel to await its delivery. But Dodi  did insist nonetheless that the pricier ring be delivered too in case it appealed to Diana anyway.

Repossi delivered the two rings an hour later. They were collected by Roulet. On inspecting them, Dodi chose the very one he had seen in Monte Carlo, apparently at the insistence of Diana.  There is a possibility that Diana, who was very much aware of her public image and was not comfortable with ostentatious displays of wealth, may have deliberately shown an interest in a less expensive engagement ring. It  may have been a purely romantic as opposed to a prestigious  choice for her.

The value of the ring, which was found on a wardrobe shelf in Dodi’s apartment after the crash,  has been estimated to be between $20,000 and $250,000 as Repossi has always refused to be drawn into revealing how much Dodi paid for it. The sum, which enjoyed a 25 percent discount, was in truth paid for not by Dodi himself but by his father as was the usual practice.

Dodi was also shown Repossi’s sketches for a bracelet, a watch, and earrings which he proposed to create if Diana approved of them.

DIANA AND DODI GUSH OVER IMMINENT NUPTIALS

At about 7 pm,  Dodi and Diana left the Ritz and headed for Dodi’s apartment at a place known as the Arc de Trompe. They went there to properly tog themselves out for the scheduled evening dinner. They spent two hours at the luxurious apartment. As usual, the ubiquitous paparazzi were patiently waiting for them there.

As they lingered in the apartment, Dodi beckoned over to his butler Rene Delorm  and showed him  the engagement ring. “Dodi came into my kitchen,” Delorm relates. “He looked into the hallway to check that Diana couldn’t hear and reached into his pocket and pulled out the box … He said, ‘Rene, I’m going to propose to the princess tonight. Make sure that we have champagne on ice when we come back from dinner’.” Rene described the ring as “a spectacular diamond encrusted ring, a massive emerald surrounded by a cluster of diamonds, set on a yellow and white gold band sitting in a small light-grey velvet box”.

Just before 9 pm, Dodi called the brother of his step-father, Hassan Yassen, who also was staying at the Ritz  that night, and told him that he hoped to get married to Diana by the end of the year.

Later that same evening, both Dodi and Diana would talk to Mohamed Al Fayed, Dodi’s dad, and make known to him their pre-nuptial intentions. “They called me and said we’re coming back  (to London) on Sunday (August 31) and on Monday (September 1) they are

Continue Reading

Columns

RAMADAN – The Blessed Month of Fasting

28th March 2023

Ramadan is the fasting month for Muslims, where over one billion Muslims throughout the world fast from dawn to sunset, and pray additional prayers at night. It is a time for inner reflection, devotion to Allah, and self-control. It is the ninth month in the Islamic calendar. As you read this Muslims the world over have already begun fasting as the month of Ramadan has commenced (depending on the sighting of the new moon).

‘The month of Ramadan is that in which the Qur’an was revealed as guidance for people, in it are clear signs of guidance and Criterion, therefore whoever of you who witnesses this month, it is obligatory on him to fast it. But whoever is ill or traveling let him fast the same number of other days, God desires ease for you and not hardship, and He desires that you complete the ordained period and glorify God for His guidance to you, that you may be grateful”. Holy Qur’an  (2 : 185)

Fasting during Ramadan is one of the five pillars upon which the structure of Islam is built. The other four are: the declaration of one’s belief in Allah’s oneness and in the message of Muhammad (PBUH); regular attendance to prayer; payment of zakaat (obligatory charity); and the pilgrimage to Mecca.

As explained in an earlier article, fasting includes total abstinence from eating, drinking, smoking, refraining from obscenity, avoiding getting into arguments and including abstaining from marital relations, from sunrise to sunset. While fasting may appear to some as difficult Muslims see it as an opportunity to get closer to their Lord, a chance to develop spiritually and at the same time the act of fasting builds character, discipline and self-restraint.

Just as our cars require servicing at regular intervals, so do Muslims consider Ramadan as a month in which the body and spirit undergoes as it were a ‘full service’. This ‘service’ includes heightened spiritual awareness both the mental and physical aspects and also the body undergoing a process of detoxification and some of the organs get to ‘rest’ through fasting.

Because of the intensive devotional activity fasting, Ramadan has a particularly high importance, derived from its very personal nature as an act of worship but there is nothing to stop anyone from privately violating Allah’s commandment of fasting if one chooses to do so by claiming to be fasting yet eating on the sly. This means that although fasting is obligatory, its observance is purely voluntary. If a person claims to be a Muslim, he is expected to fast in Ramadan.

 

The reward Allah gives for proper fasting is very generous. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) quotes Allah as saying: “All actions done by a human being are his own except fasting, which belongs to Me and I will reward it accordingly.” We are also told by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that the reward for proper fasting is admittance into heaven.

Fasting earns great reward when it is done in a ‘proper’ manner. This is because every Muslim is required to make his worship perfect. For example perfection of fasting can be achieved through restraint of one’s feelings and emotions. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said that when fasting, a person should not allow himself to be drawn into a quarrel or a slanging match. He teaches us: “On a day of fasting, let no one of you indulge in any obscenity, or enter into a slanging match. Should someone abuse or fight him, let him respond by saying: ‘I am fasting!’”

This high standard of self-restraint fits in well with fasting, which is considered as an act of self-discipline. Islam requires us to couple patience with voluntary abstention from indulgence in our physical desires. The purpose of fasting helps man to attain a high degree of sublimity, discipline and self-restraint. In other words, this standard CAN BE achieved by every Muslim who knows the purpose of fasting and strives to fulfill it.

Fasting has another special aspect. It makes all people share in the feelings of hunger and thirst. In normal circumstances, people with decent income may go from one year’s end to another without experiencing the pangs of hunger which a poor person may feel every day of his life. Such an experience helps to draw the rich one’s conscience nearer to needs of the poor. A Muslim is encouraged to be more charitable and learns to give generously for a good cause.

Fasting also has a universal or communal aspect to it. As Muslims throughout the world share in this blessed act of worship, their sense of unity is enhanced by the fact that every Muslim individual joins willingly in the fulfillment of this divine commandment. This is a unity of action and purpose, since they all fast in order to be better human beings. As a person restrains himself from the things he desires most, in the hope that he will earn Allah’s pleasure, self-discipline and sacrifice become part of his nature.

The month of Ramadan can aptly be described as a “season of worship.” Fasting is the main aspect of worship in this month, because people are more attentive to their prayers, read the Qur’an more frequently and also strive to improve on their inner and outer character. Thus, their devotion is more complete and they feel much happier in Ramadan because they feel themselves to be closer to their Creator.

Continue Reading