Though vilified in the manner Judas is, Cain was a man of surpassing stature
In every sermon belted out from Christian pulpits, General Atiku, the Mark of Cain is invariably described as a curse. The notion is absurd as the Bible itself says, in GENESIS 4:15, that, â€œThen the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him”. The Mark of Cain was thus an insignia of protection: it was a preservative feature rather than a punitive measure, General. It was not a curse at all.
The curse was separate from the redemptive Mark of Cain. The curse is explained in GENESIS 4:11-12. It was expulsion from the Edin, the land where Cain had shed blood, and condemnation to a life of endless wondering into uncharted territory far and beyond. The Mark of Cain was meant to distinguish Cain for preservation during these wanderings. So exactly what was it, General?
The highly regarded Grail bloodline historian Laurence Gardner provides an answer that is corroborated by several other objective and meticulous sources thus: â€œAs for the enigmatic mark placed upon Cain, this is probably the most important aspect of the story so far, because although not defined in the Bible, the Mark of Cain is the oldest recorded Grant of Arms in sovereign history. In the Midrash and Phoenician traditions, the Mark of Cain is defined as being a cross within a circle. [Which is also the astronomical/astrological symbol for Earth.] It was, in principle, a graphic representation of kingship, which the Hebrews called the Malkhut (â€˜Kingdomâ€™; from the Akkadian word malku = sovereign).â€
As Crown Prince, General,Â Cain already had a mark that designated him as such, long before he killed Abel. This was a cross within a circle. The mark was also known as a Grant of Arms in that only a King or Crown Prince had the right to bear ceremonial arms. In point of fact, all cultures of antiquity bore distinct birthmarks that defined their ancestry. In the African culture, these typically took the form of incisions on the face mainly but also on other parts of the body such as over the heart or between the shoulders. In the days of the Anunnaki, birthmarks took the form of tattoos as they had the technology to indelibly imprint them.
In those days, there was no DNA testing (among Earthlings) as we know it today. As such, they had to find a way of visually identifying somebody for who he claimed he was, particularly if he was a member of the nobility. If, for example, one claimed he was a Saili, he had to point to a mark on his body identifying him as a Saili. Thus the Mark of Cain would identify Cain wherever he was on the globe that where he came from (that is, the Edin), he was actually a royal and a Crown Prince for that matter. That way, even if he met hostile people, he would be treated either respectfully or with great caution, General.
When Enki came down from the judgement seat to ratify Cain as Crown Prince, he was not bestowing on him the Right of Succession. He was confirming it â€“ that it had by no means lapsed by forfeiture but was still in force and would always be in force. The Mark of Cain was an affirmation of an inborn right,Â General. It was not a stain or any such black mark.
CAIN IS BANISHED
Before the banished Cain set out on a vagrant life across the world accompanied by a contingent of loyalists, General, he decided to get hitched first. This was crucial in that he did not wish to marry a stranger in the course of his wanderings and therefore dilute the royal bloodline, effectively disqualifying his offspring from contention in the succession stakes. Accordingly, he approached his biological father Enki to recommend a spouse as was the custom of the day.
The woman Enki chose for him was Luluwa, also known as Awan. Luluwa was a full-blooded Anunnaki, being the daughter of Enki himself and his fellow Anunnaki mistress Lilitu. Since Lilitu was in turn related to Jehovah-Enlil as she was his granddaughter on her motherâ€™s side, Luluwa had both Enlilite and Enkite blood coursing through her veins although the Enkite genes predominated considering that Lilituâ€™s father was Nergal, Enkiâ€™s second-born son. The Anunnaki, General,Â were so shamelessly incestuous one has to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come up with a flawless family tree.
Now, during his penal peregrinations, General, Cain was not permitted to settle in one particular place for long and establish a permanent settlement. He was also forbidden to cultivate land or erect brick-and-mortar structures as partially hinted in GENESIS 4:12. This was in keeping with his sentence, which was to lead a nomadic life through six generations at the very least. There was likely another reason for such proscriptions. Enlil didnâ€™t want him to establish a flourishing domain of his own that could rival the Edin for supremacy. The notion of two centres of power on one planet was anathema both to Anu and Enlil.
Thus it was, General,Â that as he led a peripatetic life, Cain, who began as a tiller of land in the Middle East, was at various stages a Bedouin-like nomadic tent dweller who tended flocks, a musical entertainer, and a metallurgist. The musical prowess was of course inherited from Enki, who, Sumerian records tell us, was the Anunnakiâ€™s most proficient musician (Enki excelled at everything, the only such being of his era). Metallurgy, of which alchemy (turning of the ORME elements into Ormus, the versatile monoatomic white powder of gold) was a component, was a specialty of the Enkites. Enki was the â€œmaster of the craftâ€, described in the Sumerian chronicles as â€œthe manifestation of knowledge and the craftsman par excellenceâ€. By â€œcraftâ€ is meant all sorts of occupational arts.
According to Enkiâ€™s reminiscences, titled The Lost Book of Enki by Zechariah Sitchin, it took approximately 50,000 years for Cainâ€™s banishment to lapse. This was in the time of Lamech, Noahâ€™s father. By that time, there had been seven generations counting from Adapa and so it was all consistent with the duration of the curse as pronounced by Enlil. The cessation of the curse came at a time when Cain was dwelling in the Americas and had had a second-born dynastic son who was probably 30-40,000 years old. His name was Enoch, meaning â€œfoundationâ€. What evidence is there that Cain did indeed venture as far as the Americas, General?
CAINâ€™S CITY, CAINâ€™S RACE
Besides Cain and Abel, General, Adapa and Titi-Eve had other children. Altogether, they had 60 children, comprising of 30 sons and 30 daughters. The most prominent of these after Cain and Abel was Seth, their third son. When Adapa was advancing in years, his health began to fail. Soon he lost his sight. Knowing that he was staring death in the face, he asked to see all the members of his progeny, insisting that Cain too be fetched from wherever he was. Enki then detailed Ninurta, under whose tutelage Cain had been when he was a denizen of the Edin, to go look for him in his flying saucer.
With all his male offspring gathered, Adapa asked that Cain and Seth sit by him as the seniormost of the multigenerational brood. Note that although Cain was biologically Enkiâ€™s son, legally he was Adapaâ€™s son. Enlil, who was also present, then officially announced that Cain was no longer under a curse as it had run its course. With that declaration, Adapa proceeded to officially anoint Cain as his heir, the next King of Earthlings. A few years later, Adapa passed on, aged 55,800 years (that is, 930 years as recorded in the Bible multiplied by 60).
Meanwhile, Cain had unilaterally established a city in todayâ€™s North America, which he began to develop in the very year his curse ceased to be operable. In the British Museum is a Babylonian tablet catalogued BM 74329. It says, â€œA group of exiled people who were â€˜plowmenâ€™ … wandered and reached a land called Dunnu … There, their leader, named Ka’in, built a city whose landmark was a twin tower.â€ Indeed, Cain was a tiller of land (â€œploughmanâ€) and Genesis says he headed for the â€œLand of Nodâ€, which scholars interpret as simply meaning a state of endless wandering but which in truth may have been a corruption of the term Dunnu. The twin tower was in all probability a toast to Cain himself and his fraternal twin brother Abel, whose killing continued to haunt him.
Zechariah Sitchin, General,Â presents persuasive evidence that Dunnu was todayâ€™s Mexico City. He says the Aztec capital was known as Tenochtitlan, meaning â€œCity of Tenochâ€. This may well have been simply â€œEnochâ€ (Cainâ€™s second-born son) given the Aztecsâ€™ orthographical tendency to prefix many words with the sound â€œTâ€. The non-canonical Book of Jasher (deliberately excluded from the Old Testament canon for one reason or another) says, â€œAnd at that time (when the curse was lifted), Cain also began to build a city: and he built the city and he called the name of the city Enoch, according to the name of his son; for in those days the Lord (Enlil) had given him rest upon the Earth, and he did not move about and wander as in the beginning.â€ The Babylonian tablet also says, â€œHe (Kain) built in Dunnu a city with twin towers. Kain dedicated to himself the lordship over the city.â€ Indeed, when, General, the Spaniards arrived in and annexed the Aztec Empire (which extended from Central Mexico all the way to Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras) in the 16th century, they documented that the City of Enoch was distinguished by its twin-towered Aztec Temple.
Whilst in North America, Cain spawned a new race. We today call them Native Americans or Red Indians. In order to distinguish them from any other race on the planet, he called on his half-brother Ningishzidda, Enkiâ€™s genius son and a DNA expert, to embed in them a gene that would prevent them from growing a beard when they came of age. This certainly is what we see of Native Americans: they do not grow a beard at all unless they are of mixed blood. Sadly, General, this contrived genetic trait has been mistaken by scholars, who include Zechariah Sitchin himself, as the seemingly enigmatic Mark of Cain when it is far from that.
Sitchin writes thus in his book Divine Encounters: â€œWhat was this â€˜Mark of Cainâ€™? The Bible does not say, and countless guesses are just that â€“ guesses. Our own guess is that the mark might have been a genetic change, such as depriving the line of Cain of facial hair â€“ a mark that would be immediately obvious to whoever shall find them … This is a mark of recognition of Amerindians.â€ Tragically, this is a rather wild guess, General,Â for as we demonstrated above, the Mark of Cain was a symbol of sovereignty over Earth. It identified Cain as the monarchical heir to Adapa.
CAIN SUCCEEDS ADAPA
Following the death of Adapa, General, Cain returned to the Edin to succeed to the throne as the King of Earthlings (not King of Earth, please note, as that style was the preserve of Enlil, the primary Jehovah/Yahweh of the Bible). However, instead of basing himself at Eridu, where Adapa ruled from, Cain chose to rule from a newly established city-state known as Kish. That was about 56,200 years ago, about 43,200 years before the Deluge of Noahâ€™s day. Because he was Enkiâ€™s son, the Enlilites scorned Cain as the â€œSerpent Kingâ€.
Indeed, some Sumerian records refer to him as â€œArwium King of Kish, the son of Masda, and successor to King Atabba (Adapa)â€. The Sumerian Arwium is the inspiration to the Hebrew Awwim, meaning â€œsnakesâ€. Masda (Masenda) was another name of Enki. It meant â€œone who prostrates himselfâ€, as a serpent does.
We have already explained the name Cain, or Kaen, in a Sumerian context (that is, â€œOne begotten of the Lordâ€) but there is more to it than simply that. By some ancient accounts, General, the name Cain can also be rendered as Qâ€™ayin, which in fact is the Hebrew spelling of the name. When the name is truncated to simply Ayin, it assumes the meaning â€œAll-Seeing Eyeâ€. This refers to Enki, who was known as â€œLord of the Sacred Eyeâ€.
This is not a physical eye: it is the pineal gland, which metaphorically is said to be located between the two physical eyes behind the brow. The pineal gland is characterised as the All-Seeing Eye because it can perceive light (that is, illumination in the sense of metaphysical knowledge) out of the blackness of its situation. Enki, Zidda, Adapa, and Cain â€“ all Enkites or Serpentines â€“ had a tremendous gift of intuitive perception, General, hence the adage â€œBe as Wise as Serpentsâ€.
Remarks Laurence Gardner on the subject: â€œAyin is an ancient word for â€™eyeâ€™. This spelling (a-y-i-n) is actually quite important because the original spelling of Cain (whether with a â€˜Câ€™, a â€˜Kâ€™ or a â€˜Qâ€™) was not â€˜C-a-i-nâ€™ as we now know it, but â€˜C-a-y-i-nâ€™. The name Cain, in its various forms, actually denoted â€˜One of the Inner Eyeâ€™ … Indeed, Cainâ€™s father Enki-Samael was himself the Sumeriansâ€™ designated Lord of the Sacred Eye.â€
The name Qâ€™ayin also came to mean â€œsmithâ€, a metal smith, owing to another field of Cainâ€™s expertise. Cain, as we hinted before, was a surpassing metallurgist. He was an artificer of metals of the highest order, a skill he passed on to some of his descendents, particularly the highly esteemed Tubal-Cain, Noahâ€™s half-brother, who has been described as â€œthe greatest metallurgist of his ageâ€ and â€œan instructor of every artificer in brass and ironâ€.
Furthermore, most people are not aware that both the terms King and Queen in part derive from Qâ€™ayin. Kingship was actually Cainship. Let us again turn to the renowned bloodline historian Laurence Gardner: â€œFrom Kayin with a â€˜Kâ€™ derived the word â€˜Kingâ€™, and from Qayin with a â€˜Qâ€™ derived the word â€˜Queenâ€™… Given that kingship (Malkhut) was perceived as a matrilineal inheritance through Tiamat (Adamâ€™s wife Eve) and Lilith (Adapaâ€™s renegade first wife Lilitu, whose daughter with Enki, Luluwa, became Cainâ€™s wife) the name Qâ€™ayin, identified with King, was also directly associated with Queen.â€
Yet in the Bible, General, Cain is largely minimised and to a degree vilified (deliberately, by the pro-Enlil Levites, who wrote Genesis) when he was actually a colossus and a second-generation progenitor of the all-powerful bluebloods who continue to rule much of the Western world today. â€œThe Merovingians (the across-the-centuries dynasty that emerged from the conjoined Davidic lines of Jesus and his immediate younger brother James) trace their kingly succession to the original Dragon King, which was Cain,â€ writes Laurence Gardner.
â€œThe first King of the Messianic Dragon succession was the biblical Cain, head of the Sumerian House of Kish … The Dragon King was known as the King of Kings and his symbol, Draco (a serpent clutching its own tail, also known as the Ouroboros, a symbol of wholeness and wisdom) represented his succession through the Sumerian kings, Egyptian pharaohs, the Egyptian Therapeutae, the Qumran Essenes (from among whom Jesus arose) to the Merovingian kings of Europe.â€
Youngest Maccabees scion Jonathan takes over after Judas and leads for 18 years
Going hand-in-glove with the politics at play in Judea in the countdown to the AD era, General Atiku, was the contention for the priesthood. You will be aware, General, that politics and religion among the Jews interlocked. If there wasn’t a formal and sovereign Jewish King, there of necessity had to be a High Priest at any given point in time.
Initially, every High Priest was from the tribe of Levi as per the stipulation of the Torah. At some stage, however, colonisers of Judah imposed their own hand-picked High Priests who were not ethnic Levites. One such High Priest was Menelaus of the tribe of Benjamin.
A “pagan” King violates the Jewish Temple by setting up an idol in the Holy of Holies
Why, General Atiku, has the Judean setting (present-day Israel/Palestine) being the focus of so much geopolitical fervour over the ages when it is so resource-poor and is not even that agriculturally fecund being a virtual desert? Why have all the superpowers of history locked horns over it since days immemorial?