As Negroid Africans known as Bantu’s, we were likely christened by the Grail Queen
On the SSS World, as in all Reptoid worlds, General Atiku, coup de tats were far the norm than the exception. Typically, it was a princess who deposed her own mother, the Queen. The practice was to eliminate the Queen once she was overthrown, thus denying her the chance to mount a counter-coup to reclaim power.
In order to put a stop to this endless spiral of machinations, the Queen decreed a new law. The Queen was to step down from the throne whilst she was still of child-bearing age and assume a new status – that of Queen Mother. This was not simply a symbolic title as it is in the UK, General. The Queen Mother had a specific, vital role to play – that of bearing children on behalf of the Queen. In other words, she was a surrogate mother.
What used to happen was that the foetus the Queen carried in her reproductive mechanism was transplanted into the womb of the Queen Mother. The Queen Mother then carried the pregnancy to term and delivered the offspring on her daughter’s behalf. That way, the office of the Queen Mother became an indispensable institution in the SSS World.â€¨ Note, General, that bearing children was quite an onerous task for the Queen.
The Queen presided over not only her own world but a whole empire spread across the 9th Passageway of the Milky Way Galaxy. The administrators of all the worlds that were under her jurisdiction had to be her own offspring if the worlds were to remain within her imperialistic orbit. She was therefore obliged to produce children in numbers that took a heavy toll on her physical wellbeing. The office of the Queen Mother thus freed the Queen from this albatross so that she could concentrate on directly running the affairs of her empire rather than doing so by proxy.
Because of her surrogate role, the Queen Mother went by the title Queen Bi, pronounced “Bee”. On the SSS World, the letter "B" on its own meant “container of”, as indeed the Queen Mother’s womb encased her daughter’s issue. The word Bi had two meanings, General. In one sense, it meant “the birther”; in another, it meant “one who is birthed”. Now, if you recall, General, the royal females of the SSS World were amongst other titles known as TT-TT (doubling of a title signaled seniority).
Therefore, it logically follows that a daughter born to the Queen Mother would go by the title “Bi-tt-tt”, pronounced “Bee-T”. On Earth, this is the name “Betty”, the short form of “Elizabeth”, which is actually “E-lizard-beth”, or Royal Reptilian Princess. When we keep saying the Queen of England is a Reptilian, General, we’re not simply uttering drivel.
On the SSS World, the letter V was a lighter and inferior version of the letter B. That is to say, it carried a toned-down meaning. V meant “the bearer of”, or “the carrier of”, whereas B as we have seen above meant “the container of”. Since the Queen Mother carried the reproductive seed of the Queen, she was also known as Queen V. On other words, including Earth, this was pronounced as Queen Eve, Queen Ava, Queen Aya, or Queen Ea. Do you know now, General, why Adam’s wife was named Eve by Enki? It was because she gave birth to Cain, who was the son of the Orion royal Enki! (more on the subject in due course.) In other words, General, she carried the seed of the Serpent (Surbah) Prince.
KING AND QUEEN INTERMARRY
In time, General, the SSS race colonised a nearby star system that threatened their dominance of the Milky Way Galaxy’s principal trade route, the 9th Passage Way, which the ancients also called the Peshmeten. The main star in that star system was known as the Daku star. We today call it Sirius A or the Dog Star. The main planet in that system was called Ur-Ur. Its people were variously called the RRR (because of a throaty growl in their voice), the Ur-Ur, or the Asa-Ur-Ur. When abbreviated, Asa-Ur-Ur (meaning the “Blazing Destroyer”) became As-Ur, which informed the Egyptian term Asar, the Greek term Seiriois, and eventually the English term Sirius, General.
The Ur-Ur race, General, evolved from a creature that had aspects of a wolf, a lion, and a reptile, but since the wolfen features were the most punctuated, they were generally referred to as the Wolfen race. The Wolfen World was dominated by males but it was ruled by females. Moreover, it was wracked by ethnic warfare notwithstanding the fact that when the Wolfen race headed out to wage cosmic wars, they fought as a united front.
At some stage, in a bid to cement peace between Sirius and Orion, the Sirian King, known as Anu, and the Orion Queen decided to intermarry, General, so that there would be only one King and one Queen of the conjoined Syrian and Orion Empires. Both Anu and the Orion Queen were relatively young and were of the same generation although the Queen was slightly older: both had succeeded to the throne at roughly the same time. The matrimonial union, therefore, would not be reprehensibly out of kilter.
The Sirian King retained his title as Anu, whereas the Orion Queen chose the official title of Eke (also rendered Ege or Igi, meaning “Creatrix”), abbreviated as Ki. In the subsidiary worlds such as ours, however, she was primarily addressed as Ke-Ea, meaning “Divine Creatrix”, also rendered as Ga-ea or Ga-ia, the famous “mythological” goddess of Earth during a certain era. She was also referred to as Antu since it somewhat rhymed with Anu.
The union of the two mega monarchs, General, explains why Orion and Sirius have been the most famous star systems in the history of Earth in the last 500,000 years, with major landmarks (such as the Egyptian pyramids, for instance), astronomically aligned, primarily, with the star Mintaka, whose planetary system includes the throne world of Orion, and Sirius A.
WHERE WE NAMED AFTER THE ORION QUEEN?
The first male King of Sirius, General, went by the title An-An, or simply An. It meant the “Celestial One”. It was also one of the Orion Queen’s multiple titles but she didn’t mind in that she had entrusted the King of Sirius charge of the 9th Passageway. Thus in this context, it was a fitting title as it underscored the King’s seniority not in the entire Orion Empire as such but only in the 9th Passageway. His other title was “Mighty Commander”, which explains why our presidents also go by the title “Commander-In-Chief”.
The title of King Anan’s Queen was Antu, meaning “An’s Spouse”, or “First Lady” when paraphrased. The title is instructive in three respects, General. First, we now know where we derive the custom of naming wives after their husbands – Mrs Michelle Obama, for instance. Second, it evidences the fact that there was no gender parity in Sirius: women were subordinate to men and accordingly had to defer to them. Third, it clues us in as to why we sub-Saharan Africans call ourselves Bantus in the main. We are Antu’s People – aBa-Antu. Our ancestors very much were aware of our Anunnaki origins, General!
But why Antu’s People and not An’s People to fit the malecentric paradigm? Antu is of course a positive appellation: the first Queen of Sirius under the new dispensation – the Orion Queen – was synonymous with love; she was reportedly love personified. Thus, even when today we say ubuntu (botho in your national vernacular, General), we are actually appealing to the need to aspire to the highest standard of humanness. But that is simply one reason why dark-skinned Africans took delight in calling themselves Bantus.
Men may be calling the shots and conferring blessings in Sirius but children are named by their mothers, not their fathers. This is a custom the Anunnaki, the Old Testament gods, passed on to our forbearers here on Earth. For example, Jacob let his wives Leah and Rachel name the children he had with them as well as those he had with their handmaidens.
Both Samson and his father Samuel were named by their mothers. Now, the place where the Anunnaki’s Enki fashioned Adam was in East Africa. When the Sirian-Orion Queen officially recognised the first human creatures, did she send word to Enki that we should be called Bantu after her royal title and in accordance with a woman’s prerogative to name the offspring, General?
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ENKI
The Orion Queen’s oldest son, General, went by the princely title Ea, also rendered Aja, Aya, or Eje. Ea originally meant “Diving Being”. In Sumerian times (about 6000 years ago), however, it would come to mean “He whose house is water”. This latter meaning had two connotations in the main, General. The first referred to fish (the emblem of the astrological Age of Pisces which was associated with Enki), as indeed fish reside in a body of water. The second had to do with space. The ancients referred to space as the “Ocean of the Khaa”.
Khaa was a euphemism for the SSS beings, the people of Orion. It was a fitting name for space as the Orion Queen controlled the 9th Passageway, the principal galactic trade route. Ea’s other title was Ene-Eke, meaning “Creator Prince”. Ene–Eke would over time be abbreviated as Enki (or En-Gi), General. Ea was called Enki because he was at once the son of the Orion Queen and the SSS world’s master geneticist.
As a geneticist, he was a virtual creator since he could mix the genes of several species to create a new species or simply tinker with the genome to get rid of certain traits and bring up new ones. It is in fact acknowledged throughout our galaxy that the SSS race, also known as the Serpent race, are the best geneticists there are. Now, in case you have forgotten what we said about the SSS people, General, we did underline the fact that they reproduced both sexually and asexually (without fertilisation by male gametes).
This phenomenon was a carryover from their initial evolutional background as Khebs – a dragonfly-bee. We all know, General, that bees produce either sexually or asexually. In the case of sexual reproduction, the resulting offspring is always a female: in the case of asexual reproduction, the result is always a male. The SSS people continued to reproduce that way even as humanoids, such that in the case of the Queen, all the princesses were born through sexual reproduction and all the princes were born by way of asexual reproduction. As such, Enki had no father at all: only a mother, General. His was a sort of virgin birth. Where have we heard that before, General? In the surface story of Jesus of course.
A VIRGIN BIRTH CAN HAPPEN
You may be surprised to learn, General, that a virgin birth is not only possible but is demonstrable. There is even a scientific word for it – parthenogenesis. This is a form of reproduction where an ovum develops into fully functional offspring without being fertilised by a sperm cell from the male. About 100 years ago, the famous biologist Jacques Loeb said: “The male is not necessary for reproduction. A simple physio-chemical agent in the female is enough to bring it about."
True, parthenogenesis has been observed in the animal kingdom, General. It was first documented in 1845 by the Swiss naturalist Charles Bonnet. Bonnet noted that female aphids (small sap-sucking insects) laid eggs which developed to full adulthood without mating with a male. Parthenogenesis has since been observed in a range of insects (e.g. ants and honeybees), reptiles such as komodo dragons, monitor lizards, and snakes, as well as sharks. In June 2012, an 11-year-old reticulated python produced six babies without mating with a male snake at Louis Zoo in Kentucky in the US.
Parthenogenesis does not naturally occur in mammals, General, but it can be induced, that is, artificially engendered. For instance, in 1936, Gregory Goodwin Pincus successfully induced parthenogenesis in a rabbit. In April 2004, scientists at the Tokyo University of Agriculture created a mouse using pathogenesis. Monkeys have also been produced using the same process. The snag with mammals arising from artificial parthenogenesis, General, is that they either do not live to a ripe age or they develop certain abnormalities that seriously handicap them in one way or the other.
What about humans, General? As we have underscored in The Earth Chronicles series, the female was the first physical species. For eons, females reproduced their kind by parthenogenesis. Males came later when the “gods” decided not only to vary the species but to wrest universal sovereignty from the “goddess”. As the American botanist, paleontologist, and sociologist Lester Frank Ward (1841-1913) aptly put it, “Women are the race itself – the strong primary sex – and men the biological afterthought.”
Parthenogenesis is not actively operative in human females, General, but remains latent, meaning it could occur if intently and painstakingly stimulated. In 1933, Dr Walter Timme, a famed endocrinologist, delivered a lecture to the New York Academy of Medicine titled “Immaculate Conception – A Scientific Possibility" in which he persuasively argued that a virgin birth was physiologically possible.
This was because the parovarium (a group of tiny, tube-like structures often found near the ovary or oviduct) in some cases did produce male reproductive cells capable of fertililising the eggs in the same body, causing them to develop without the participation of male gametes. The parovarium have been known to appear in young girls aged 8 to 16 with intact hymens, that is, who have never had sex.
A persuasive demonstration that a virgin birth in humans is feasible is the documented case of the Ojibwe, General. The Ojibwe are a North American Red Indian race who are found both in the US and in Canada. Red Indians are probably the race I admire the most in the whole wide world General. That is because they are bearers of very valuable ancient knowledge that has helped me understand the world much better than I would otherwise have (for instance, the teachings, revelations, and insights of Robert Morning Sky, a Native American of Hopi and Apache stock, are a golden nugget).
It is one, if not the major, reason the Illuminati have deliberately ostracised them and once upon a time desired to have them disappear from the face of the Earth (In the 60s/70s Cowboy movies, for example, Red Indians were always cast as bow-and-arrow wielding villains who had to be exterminated by horse-mounted, rifle-bearing Westerners).
In 1971, Den Poitras, who like Robert Morning Sky is an outspoken male feminist, reviewed a book about the Ojibwe that documented their traditional practices long before Westerners invaded and appropriated the Northern American land mass from them. This is what Poitras says about the subject of the book:
“One story (in the book) was that wise-women of the tribe looked for certain young maidens that possessed grace, intelligence, and compassion. Sometimes a candidate for conceiving and giving birth this way wouldn't show up for a generation or two. Nevertheless, these wise-women kept an eagle-eye open for her. When found, men were not allowed to court her. When she reached the age of fertility, her first period, she was instructed to fast for several days and, if willing, was required to dance around a fire in a sacred women's lodge built far away from the village.
This ceremony occurred while she was ovulating. Ideally, a state of bliss or ecstasy was reached during which, according to hidden wise-women knowledge, it would be possible for her to conceive and give birth in the ‘old way’ (virgin birth). They also knew that a child born this way would be blessed with gifts of healing, clairvoyance or leadership. The Great Spirit would give to the child whatever tools the tribe might be in need of.” Clearly then, General, a virgin birth in humans, in the manner Jesus is said to have arisen, not to mention the great Anunnaki “god” Enki, is not outlandish: it is possible and has happened, at least in ages past.
The past week or two has been a mixed grill of briefs in so far as the national employment picture is concerned. BDC just injected a further P64 million in Kromberg & Schubert, the automotive cable manufacturer and exporter, to help keep it afloat in the face of the COVID-19-engendered global economic apocalypse. The financial lifeline, which follows an earlier P36 million way back in 2017, hopefully guarantees the jobs of 2500, maybe for another year or two.
It was also reported that a bulb manufacturing company, which is two years old and is youth-led, is making waves in Selibe Phikwe. Called Bulb Word, it is the only bulb manufacturing operation in Botswana and employs 60 people. The figure is not insignificant in a town that had 5000 jobs offloaded in one fell swoop when BCL closed shop in 2016 under seemingly contrived circumstances, so that as I write, two or three buyers have submitted bids to acquire and exhume it from its stage-managed grave.
Youngest Maccabees scion Jonathan takes over after Judas and leads for 18 years
Going hand-in-glove with the politics at play in Judea in the countdown to the AD era, General Atiku, was the contention for the priesthood. You will be aware, General, that politics and religion among the Jews interlocked. If there wasn’t a formal and sovereign Jewish King, there of necessity had to be a High Priest at any given point in time.
Initially, every High Priest was from the tribe of Levi as per the stipulation of the Torah. At some stage, however, colonisers of Judah imposed their own hand-picked High Priests who were not ethnic Levites. One such High Priest was Menelaus of the tribe of Benjamin.
Parliament has rejected a motion by Leader of Opposition (LOO) calling for the reversing of the recent appointments of ruling party activists to various Land Boards across the country. The motion also called for the appointment of young and qualified Batswana with tertiary education qualifications.
The ruling party could not allow that motion to be adopted for many reasons discussed below. Why did the LOO table this motion? Why was it negated? Why are Land Boards so important that a ruling party felt compelled to deploy its functionaries to the leadership and membership positions?
Prior to the motion, there was a LOO parliamentary question on these appointments. The Speaker threw a spanner in the works by ruling that availing a list of applicants to determine who qualified and who didn’t would violate the rights of those citizens. This has completely obliterated oversight attempts by Parliament on the matter.
How can parliament ascertain the veracity of the claim without the names of applicants? The opposition seeks to challenge this decision in court. It would also be difficult in the future for Ministers and government officials to obey instructions by investigative Parliamentary Committees to summon evidence which include list of persons. It would be a bad precedent if the decision is not reviewed and set aside by the Business Advisory Committee or a Court of law.
Prior to independence, Dikgosi allocated land for residential and agricultural purposes. At independence, land tenures in Botswana became freehold, state land and tribal land. Before 1968, tribal land, which is land belonging to different tribes, dating back to pre-independence, was allocated and administered by Dikgosi under Customary Law. Dikgosi are currently merely ‘land overseers’, a responsibility that can be delegated. Land overseers assist the Land Boards by confirming the vacancy or availability for occupation of land applied for.
Post-independence, the country was managed through modern law and customary law, a system developed during colonialism. Land was allocated for agricultural purposes such as ploughing and grazing and most importantly for residential use. Over time some land was allocated for commercial purpose. In terms of the law, sinking of boreholes and development of wells was permitted and farmers had some rights over such developed water resources.
Land Boards were established under Section 3 of the Tribal Land Act of 1968 with the intention to improve tribal land administration. Whilst the law was enacted in 1968, Land Boards started operating around 1970 under the Ministry of Local Government and Lands which was renamed Ministry of Lands and Housing (MLH) in 1999. These statutory bodies were a mechanism to also prune the powers of Dikgosi over tribal land. Currently, land issues fall under the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services.
There are 12 Main Land Boards, namely Ngwato, Kgatleng, Tlokweng, Tati, Chobe, Tawana, Malete, Rolong, Ghanzi, Kgalagadi, Kweneng and Ngwaketse Land Boards. The Tribal Land Act of 1968 as amended in 1994 provides that the Land Boards have the powers to rescind the grant of any rights to use any land, impose restrictions on land usage and facilitate any transfer or change of use of land.
Some land administration powers have been decentralized to sub land boards. The devolved powers include inter alia common law and customary law water rights and land applications, mining, evictions and dispute resolution. However, decisions can be appealed to the land board or to the Minister who is at the apex.
So, land boards are very powerful entities in the country’s local government system. Membership to these institutions is important not only because of monetary benefits of allowances but also the power of these bodies. in terms of the law, candidates for appointment to Land Boards or Subs should be residents of the tribal areas where appointments are sought, be holders of at least Junior Certificate and not actively involved in politics. The LOO contended that ruling party activists have been appointed in the recent appointments.
He argued that worse, some had no minimum qualifications required by the law and that some are not inhabitants of the tribal or sub tribal areas where they have been appointed. It was also pointed that some people appointed are septuagenarians and that younger qualified Batswana with degrees have been rejected.
Other arguments raised by the opposition in general were that the development was not unusual. That the ruling party is used to politically motivated appointments in parastatals, civil service, diplomatic missions, specially elected councilors and Members of Parliament (MPs), Bogosi and Land Boards. Usually these positions are distributed as patronage to activists in return for their support and loyalty to the political leadership and the party.
The ruling party contended that when the Minister or the Ministry intervened and ultimately appointed the Land Boards Chairpersons, Deputies and members , he didn’t have information, as this was not information required in the application, on who was politically active and for that reason he could not have known who to not appoint on that basis. They also argued that opposition activists have been appointed to positions in the government.
The counter argument was that there was a reason for the legal requirement of exclusion of political activists and that the government ought to have mechanisms to detect those. The whole argument of “‘we didn’t know who was politically active” was frivolous. The fact is that ruling party activists have been appointed. The opposition also argued that erstwhile activists from their ranks have been recruited through positions and that a few who are serving in public offices have either been bought or hold insignificant positions which they qualified for anyway.
Whilst people should not be excluded from public positions because of their political activism, the ruling party cannot hide the fact that they have used public positions to reward activists. Exclusion of political activists may be a violation of fundamental human or constitutional rights. But, the packing of Land Boards with the ruling party activists is clear political corruption. It seeks to sow divisions in communities and administer land in a politically biased manner.
It should be expected that the ruling party officials applying for land or change of land usage etcetera will be greatly assisted. Since land is wealth, the ruling party seeks to secure resources for its members and leaders. The appointments served to reward 2019 election primary and general elections losers and other activists who have shown loyalty to the leadership and the party.
Running a country like this has divided it in a way that may be difficult to undo. The next government may decide to reset the whole system by replacing many of government agencies leadership and management in a way that is political. In fact, it would be compelled to do so to cleanse the system.
The opposition is also pondering on approaching the courts for review of the decision to appoint party functionaries and the general violation of clearly stated terms of reference. If this can be established with evidence, the courts can set aside the decision on the basis that unqualified people have been appointed.
The political activism aspect may also not be difficult to prove as some of these people are known activists who are in party structures, at least at the time of appointment, and some were recently candidates. There is a needed for civil society organizations such as trade unions and political parties to fight some of these decisions through peaceful protests and courts.