This week we focus on Stewart Swerdlow, the metaphysical illuminator and survivor of the infamous, Reptoid-driven Montauk Project
MIND RE-INTRODUCING STEWART SWERDLOW (SVERDLOW IN ITS ORIGINAL RENDERING) BEN FOR THE SAKE OF THOSE WHO KNOW VERY LITTLE OR NOTHING ABOUT HIM?
He’s a very fascinating guy I must say. His life history sounds stranger than fiction. For instance, he was born to a mother “without a birth canal”. Stewart was simply implanted in her womb. His genetics are so peculiar that it was one reason he was conscripted into the infamous Montauk Project. For instance, his DNA is blended from 22 Alien species from various parts of the Milky Way Galaxy. This constitutes over 120 civilisations. He has extra vertebrae in his neck and less teeth than an ordinary human.
I’ll let him speak for himself lest I over-summarise: “My life has been unconventional since my birth and most likely before. My family history is a part of this. My great-uncle, Yakov Sverdlov, was the first President of the Soviet Union. His son, my cousin, created the KGB. My grandfather, Mikhail Sverdlov, was sent to the UK to start the Communist Party. After he was successful there, he was sent to the USA to do the same thing.
My grandmother, Maya Sverdlov, was a Soviet spy during World War 2 in Europe where she blackmailed top Nazi officers and officials to stop the advance on Russia. Another great-uncle, Benjamin Sverdlov, convinced the US President to enter World War I so that the Red Army would be unchallenged to create the revolution. He also got the US government to send $20 million to Russia to finance the Red Army. In the 1930s, Benjamin began mind-control and programming in the Soviet Union, making it the first key nation on Earth to do so.
Yakov ordered the assassination of the Czar and his family in the Ural Mountain city of Yekaterinburg, then renaming it to Sverdlovsk in honour of the event. Because of all of this, I was taken into service as a 13-year-old, becoming part of the mind-control and programming experimentation of the Montauk Project from 1970 to 1983 … My father was used in secret military work under a mountain in El Paso, Texas. When I was born, the Secret Service followed him for 3 years at least.”
IN HIS VIDEOS AND LECTURES, STEWART SWERDLOW TALKS A GREAT DEAL ABOUT “HYPERSPACE”. PLEASE UNPACK THE TERM FOR US.
Okay, he says there are basically three levels of existence. These are hyperspace, astral, and physical. In his 1999 book, The Healer's Handbook: A Journey Into Hyperspace, he defines Hyperspace as “a state of being that is pure energy, oblivious to time or space. Here, there is instant transmission of thought and concept. The method of communication is via colour, tone, and archetype symbol. This is the foundation of all creation …” He says he was taught Hyperspace at Montauk.
“It was there that I learned and was trained in hyperspace work, using Alien and Nazi technology. I was assigned to go into higher levels of the non-physical existences in order to understand the Language of Hyperspace, which is made up of colour, tone, and archetype-symbols. In essence, it is the language that the Creator/God-Mind uses as a formula to manifest all of existence.”
While in high school (he was born on Long Island in New York), Stewart was picked up at night by what he initially thought were ETs and brought to Montauk. Later on, he learned his hijackers were military officials working under the guise of ETs. Because of Stewart's "special" characteristics, he became part of the Montauk genetic experiment program. He later learned that only 1% of the people in that program ever survived.
STEWART SWERDLOW’S STORY ESSENTIALLY COMMENCES WITH THE MONTAUK PROJECT. WHAT WAS THE MONTAUK PROJECT?
The Montauk Project was a series of secret United States government projects conducted at Camp Hero or Montauk Air Force Station on Montauk, Long Island, for the purpose of developing psychological warfare techniques and exotic research including time travel. The project also involved advanced technological research, mind-control, weather control, genetic manipulation, sexual magick ritual, hyperspace research, Alien communication, esoteric weaponry, and interdimensional exploration.
Says one report: “The facility was expanded to as many as twelve levels and several hundred workers. Some reports have the facility extending under the town of Montauk itself. Homeless people and orphans were abducted and subjected to huge amounts of electromagnetic radiation to test mind control technology and remote brain programming. Few survived. People had their psychic abilities enhanced to the point where they could materialise objects out of thin air. An Alien supposedly designed a chair, which an individual could sit in to boost his mental and precipitory powers.
A prototype duplicate was given to England and put in a facility on the Thames River. Teleportation experiments were conducted. A ‘porthole (portal?) in time’ was created which allowed researchers to travel anywhere in time or space. This was developed into a stable ‘Time Tunnel’. Underground tunnels with abandoned cultural archives were explored on Mars using this technique. Contact was made with Alien extraterrestrials through the Time Tunnel and technology was exchanged with them which enhanced the project.
This allowed broader access to ‘hyperspace’. Mind control experiments were conducted and runaway and kidnapped boys were abducted and brought out to the base where they underwent excruciating periods of both physical and mental torture in order to break their minds, then their minds were re-programmed. Many were supposedly killed during the process and buried on the site. Others were released with programming as mind-slaves with alternate personalities to be sleeper cells who could be activated to perform missions.”
Stewart Swerdlow says his "psionic" faculties were boosted but at the cost of emotional instability, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other issues. According to Stewart, Montauk was discontinued in 1983 but it may as well have resurfaced in another guise as most of the Illuminati’s diabolical projects do.
JUST HOW HUGE WAS THE MONTAUK INFRASTRUCTURE INTRODUCED TO US BY STEWART SWERDLOW?
The Montauk site had actually been used for nearly 200 years, with deeper levels and pathways leading out to the oceans. General George Washington was the first to use the site in 1799, when he had underground bunkers and storehouses built below to hold supplies and weapons for the troops. At the time of its “closure”, it had up to 12 underground layers that held many secrets. “At one point,” says Swerdlow, “they even discovered the tops of an Atlantean pyramid buried under the area with advanced technology that no one knew how to use.” Swerdlow writes at length on the project in his book Montauk: The Alien Connection.
STEWART SWERDLOW SAYS MIND CONTROL PROGRAMMING WAS HEAVILY USED AT MONTAUK. WHY DID THE LUCIFERIAN CABAL RESORT TO THIS SORT OF MENTAL MANIPULATION?
He says mind control was initiated by the Soviets and elevated to an art form by the Nazis. At the end of World War II, the so-called elite created Project Paperclip, which smuggled into the US the Nazi war criminal scientists to continue their work. “Since the elite are no more than a few hundred thousand in total, it is difficult to control the billions of people on the planet,” Stewart says in an online interview.
“Armies and weapons are not enough since the sheer volume of people could easily overwhelm the leaders should the truth become public. Therefore, the best solution, which was instigated by the Soviet Union and taken up by the Nazis, was to create programming and mind-control over the masses. The best slave is one who does not know that he or she is a slave.”
JUST HOW DID SWERDLOW ENDURE MONTAUK?
It boggles the mind really. I think it has to do with the power of mind over body. Montauk was at once an ordeal and a priceless institution of learning for Swerdlow. Listen to part of the purgatory he was subjected to and how he reversed it: “At Montauk Project, I was blinded for 29 years. They wanted to create a person who could see into other realities without the use of a device. In effect, I became a human MRI machine. I had surgery in 1999 to restore my sight … The project also left me with Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, migraines, back pain, and hearing issues. All of these have been cured by my own hyperspace and alternative healing work.”
IS IT TRUE THAT ONE OF SWERDLOW’S KIDS WAS BORN ALREADY AN ADULT?
It’s true yes. This was Jonathan. Swerdlow was present when his wife Janet was being delivered by caesarian section and the moment he saw the newborn, he cried, “It's not a baby, it's a man!" He adds: “I must have turned white because Janet was concerned about me. They cleaned him up and handed him to me. I held the baby and showed him to Janet while they closed her up. He was big and had man-like features. He did not look like a newborn. This was eerie to me considering what I just experienced. He cried like a Reptilian. His screeches were like those of a dinosaur, or at least I assumed it was.”
IN VIEW OF WHAT STEWART SWERDLOW AND OTHERS OF HIS ILK HAVE WRITTEN, IS IT RIGHT TO SAY ALL THE FAMILIAR HISTORY ABOUT OUR PLANET IS DISINFORMATION?
You dead right. It’s all “lies” in the words of Swerdlow and remember when a lie is repeated often enough, it assumes the status of a fact. “As far as the history of this planet is concerned,” Stewart writes in his book Blue Blood, True Blood, “you can consider that everything you ever learned is a complete lie. All history and science books are rewritten to accommodate the agenda of the controllers of this planet.
These books are just as false as the New Age material spewing forth from such places as Sedona and Santa Fe, to name a couple of Illuminati Meccas. Disinformation is rampant everywhere. My information comes from my Montauk Project indoctrinations, experiences, conversations with scientists involved in Illuminati programs, communications with Alien and interdimensional beings whom I met at various government projects, and through the probing of my own Oversoul.”
ACCORDING TO STEWART SWERDLOW, HOW DO REPTOIDS/REPTILIANS CONTROL EARTH?
They do so in a rather subtle way. This is his explanation: “Most people are still not willing to accept or even entertain the idea that hybrid Reptilians are in control of this planet … The controllers plan the pattern of coming events in such a way as to purposefully disorient the masses while they alone see the destination and the order of life. The masses are lead to believe that haphazard events amidst chaos shape their existence. In true reality, there is no such thing as chaos.
Chaos is simply a pattern not yet understood or perceived. Think about an ant crawling over a designed, tiled floor. The ant may seem confused or disoriented; not knowing which way to go. But a human being watching the ant from a higher perspective clearly sees the floor pattern and knows which way the ant can get to its destination. To the ant, there is only perceived chaos. To the human, there is a prescribed pattern. To the controllers, the humans are the ants.
The controllers are interested in directing the people in such a way that they do not know that they are being directed. The controllers work slowly and methodically from a global perspective to accomplish their goals. With awareness, you too, can perceive order from the chaos, make some conscious decisions, and gain control of your own life and destiny.”
DOES STEWART SWERDLOW ALSO ECHO THE NOTION THAT THE REPTOIDS WERE CREATED BY THE PAAL TAAL?
He virtually does so. But his name for the Paal Taal (the first beings God created and who in turn created angels/demons and mankind) is the “Transparent People”. The Transparent people are so-called because when the manifest in this physical reality, they look like a transparent glass shell. They “cannot really enter into the physical dimensions because their energy vibratory rate is so high that it cannot sustain a physical body”.
WHY DOES STEWART SWERDLOW REFER TO REPTILIANS AS “BLUE-BLOODS”?
It has to do with the colour of their blood. Human blood is iron-based and is actually yellowish in colour. But when it is exposed to oxygen, it turns red. In the case of Reptilians, their blood is copper-based and when it is exposed to oxygen, it turns bluish-green.
PEOPLE WITH BLUE EYES AND BLONDE HAIR ARE THE REPTILIANS’ MAIN INSTRUMENTS OF THEIR DIABOLICAL AGENDA FOR MANKIND. WHY IS THIS SO?
They are genetically predisposed to demon-possession, and demons constitute the astral form of Reptoids. The same applies to people with green eyes and red hair. “The Reptilian geneticists are ideally looking for a 50-50 ratio between human and Reptilian genetics,” Swerdlow says. “This combination is designed to produce a form that looks human, but can shapeshift back to Reptilian by concentrating on the genetics the hybrid [wishes] to open, or lock up, whatever the case may be.
Marriages and relationships between hybrid families are carefully selected in an effort to maintain this human-Reptilian parity. “But not every such person is manipulated by Reptoids. The vulnerability to Reptoid possession has to be opened up in a ritual. It is one reason the Illuminati are so obsessed with “blood rituals and ceremonies using humans as the source of food and hormones”.. The greater majority of blue-eyed and blonde-haired people are not controlled by Reptoids.
Swerdlow does describe the satanic-Reptilian rituals that he was forced to attend. He tells how the Reptilians ate babies and foetuses, many of which were supplied through Reptilian bloodline-controlled abortion clinics in the same way that they were supplied with human blood from the blood banks they controlled. “They also had live babies that they held up by the back of the neck,” he writes. “Then they slashed its throat from left to right, ear to ear, biting down on the gaping opening to drink the blood. This was an amazing delicacy to them.”
WHAT DOES STEWART SWERDLOW SAY ABOUT OUR REPSONSIBILITY FOR OUR OWN FATE EVEN IN THE FACE OF REPTOIDS?
He says the onus is all ours. His own words on the subject: “The most important point for people to know is that we each must accept responsibility for every thought, emotion and action. We are given Free Choice under the Free Will of God-Mind. It allows us to create and manifest whatever we think and feel. We are not innocent victims, we are willing participants … The value of taking profound personal responsibility cannot be emphasised enough. I like to use the analogy that thoughts are like film, the brain is the projector, physical reality is the screen.
If you don’t like the ‘movie’ that is playing in your life, you must change the ‘film’, which is the way you think. Accept that you have created your entire life experience and only you can change it. Knowing this gives you all the power in creation. Remember, the only thing that exists is the Mind of God. All of creation is an aspect of it, eternally. Therefore, you have the God-Mind within you since that is all there is in existence.
Knowing this, you can apply the laws of God to change, create, recreate and correct everything in your life! It is important to release old, negative mind-patterns that have created issues of low self-worth, abandonment, self-sabotage, and self-punishment. We need to grow up the damaged and frightened child within that is stuck emotionally at an age where trauma occurred.”
NOW THAT STEWART SWERDLOW IS FREE OF MONTAUK SHACKLES, HOW DOES HE USE HIS KNOWLEDGE TO BENEFIT THE REST OF MANKIND?
This is what he says: “My wife, Janet, and I work 24/7 to teach people how to open the 90% of the brain that is not used and the 97% of the DNA that is locked up. We write books, do global and intergalactic research, teach seminars and webinars, and appear on radio and TV internationally. I have developed deprogramming techniques based on Wilhelm Reich and Tesla (Nikola) information, as well as what I had learned at Montauk.
I have a doctorate in alternative medicine and deprogramming. I can see energy fields and pick up thoughts and DNA patterns. I am currently involved in Kuiper Belt research and applying ancient spiritual/angelic techniques from millennia ago. I do receive information about the health of others, I communicate with the departed, I speak with interdimensional beings as well as Aliens, I monitor Earth seismic activities, and I have received information regarding what I am supposed to do in this lifetime, what I should study, where I should go, what historical information I need to know as well as future events.”
Intelligence and Security Service Act, which is a law that establishes the Directorate of Intelligence and Security Service (DIS), provides for establishment of a Parliamentary Committee. Recently, the President announced nine names of Members of Parliament he had appointed to the Committee.
This announcement was preceded by a meeting the President held with the Speaker and the Leader of Opposition. Following the announcement of Committee MPs by the President, the opposition, through its leader, made it clear that it will not participate in the Committee unless certain conditions that would ensure effective oversight are met. The opposition acted on the non-participation threat through resignation of its three MPs from the Committee.
The Act at Section 38 provides for the establishment of the Committee to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Directorate. The law provides that the Parliamentary Committee shall have the same powers and privileges set out under the National Assembly (Powers and Privileges) Act.
On composition, the Committee shall consist of nine members who shall not be members of Cabinet and its quorum shall be five members. The MPs in the Committee elect a chairperson from among their number at their first meeting.
The Members of the Committee are appointed by the President after consultation with the Speaker of the National Assembly and Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly. It is the provision of the law that the Committee, relative to its size, reflect the numerical strengths of the political parties represented in the National Assembly.
The Act provides that that a member of the Committee holds office for the duration of the Parliament in which he or she is appointed. The Committee is mandated to make an annual report on the discharge of their functions to the President and may at any time report to him or her on any matter relating to the discharge of those functions.
The Minister responsible for intelligence and security is obliged to lay before the National Assembly a copy of each annual report made by the Committee together with a statement as to whether any matter has been excluded from that copy in pursuance of the provision of the Act.
If it appears to the Minister, after consultation with the Parliamentary Committee, that the publication of any matter in a report would be prejudicial to the continued discharge of the functions of the Directorate, the Minister may exclude that matter from the copy of the report as laid before the National Assembly.
So, what are the specific demands of the Opposition and why are they not participating in the Committee? What should happen as a way forward? The Opposition demanded that there be a forensic audit of the Directorate. The DIS has never been audited since it was set up in 2008, more than a decade ago.
The institution has been a law unto itself for a longtime, feared by all oversight bodies. The Auditor General, who had no security of tenure, could not audit the DIS. The Directorate’s personnel, especially at a high level, have been implicated in corruption. Some of its operatives are in courts of law defending corruption charges preferred against them. Some of the corruption cases which appeared in the media have not made it to the courts.
The DIS has been accused of non-accountability and unethical practices as well as of being a burden on the fiscus. So, the Opposition demanded, from the President, a forensic audit for the purpose of cleaning up the DIS. They demand a start from a clean slate.
The second demand by the Opposition is that the law be reviewed to ensure greater accountability of the DIS to Parliament. What are some of the issues that the opposition think should be reviewed? The contention is that the executive cannot appoint a Committee of Parliament to scrutinize an executive institution.
Already, it is argued, Parliament is less independent and it is dominated by the executive. It is contended that the Committee should be established by the Standing Orders and be appointed by a Select Committee of Parliament. There is also an argument that the Committee should report to Parliament and not to the President and that the Minister should not have any role in the Committee.
Democratic and Parliamentary oversight of the intelligence is relatively a new phenomenon across the World. Even developed democracies are still grappling with some of these issues. However, there are acceptable standards or what might be called international best practices which have evolved over the past two or so decades.
In the UK for instance, MPs of the Intelligence and Security Committee are appointed by the Houses of Parliament, having been nominated by the Prime Minister in consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. This is a good balancing exercise of involvement of both the executive and the legislature. Consultation is taken for granted in Botswana context in the sense that it has been reduced to just informing the Leader of Opposition without much regard to his or her ideas; they are never taken seriously.
Furthermore, the current Committee in the UK has four Members of the ruling party and five MPs from the opposition. It is a fairly balanced Committee in terms of Parliamentary representation. However, as said above, the President of Botswana appointed six ruling party MPs and three from the opposition.
The imbalance is preposterous and more pronounced with clear intentions of getting the executive way through the ruling party representatives in the Committee. The intention to avoid scrutiny is clear from the numbers of the ruling party MPs in the Committee.
There is also an international standard of removing sensitive parts which may harm national security from the report before it is tabled in the legislature. The previous and current reluctance of the executive arms to open up on Defence and Security matters emanate from this very reason of preserving and protecting national security.
But national security should be balanced with public interest and other democratic principles. The decision to expunge certain information which may be prejudicial to national security should not be an arbitrary and exclusive decision of the executive but a collective decision of a well fairly balanced Committee in consultation with the Speaker and the minister responsible.
There is no doubt that the DIS has been a rogue institution. The reluctance by the President to commit to democratic-parliamentary oversight reforms presupposes a lack of commitment to democratization. The President has no interest in seeing a reformed DIS with effective oversight of the agency.
He is insincere. This is because the President loathes the idea losing an iota of power and sharing it with any other democratic institution. He sees the agency as his power lever to sustain his stay in the high office. He thought he could sanitize himself with an ineffective DIS Committee that would dance to his tune.
The non-participation of the opposition MPs renders the Committee dysfunctional; it cannot function as this would be unlawful. Participation of the opposition is a legal requirement. Even if it can meet, it would lack legitimacy; it cannot be taken seriously. The President should therefore act on the oversight demands and reform the DIS if he is to be taken seriously.
For years I have trained people about paradigm shifts – those light-bulb-switch-on moments – where there is a seismic change from the usual way of thinking about something to a newer, better way.
I like to refer to them as ‘aha’ moments because of the sudden understanding of something which was previously incomprehensible. However, the topic of today’s article is the complete antithesis of ‘aha’. Though I’d love to tell you I’d had a ‘eureka ‘, ‘problem solved’ moment, I am faced with the complete opposite – an ‘oh-no’ moment or Lost Leader Syndrome.
No matter how well prepared or capable a leader is. they often find themselves facing perplexing events, confounding information, or puzzling situations. Confused by developments of which they can’t make sense and by challenges that they don’t know how to solve they become confused, sometimes lost and completely clueless about what to do.
I am told by Jentz and Murphy (JM) in ‘What leaders do when they don’t know what to do’ that this is normal, and that rapid change is making confusion a defining feature of management in the 21st century. Now doesn’t that sound like the story of 2020 summed up in a single sentence?
The basic premise of their writing is that “confusion is not a weakness to be ashamed of but a regular and inevitable condition of leadership. By learning to embrace their confusion, managers are able to set in motion a constructive process for addressing baffling issues.
In fact, confusion turns out to be a fruitful environment in which the best managers thrive by using the instability around them to open up better lines of communication, test their old assumptions and values against changing realities, and develop more creative approaches to problem solving.”
The problem with this ideology however is that it doesn’t help my overwhelming feelings of fear and panic which is exacerbated by a tape playing on a loop in my head saying ‘you’re supposed to know what to do, do something’. My angst is compounded by annoying motivational phrases also unhelpfully playing in my head like.
Nothing happens until something moves
The secret of getting ahead is getting started
Act or be acted upon
All these platitudes are urging me to pull something out of the bag, but I know that this is a trap. This need to forge ahead is nothing but a coping mechanism and disguise. Instead of owning the fact that I haven’t got a foggy about what to do, part of me worries that I’ll lose authority if I acknowledge that I can’t provide direction – I’m supposed to know the answers, I’m the MD! This feeling of not being in control is common for managers in ‘oh no’ situations and as a result they often start reflexively and unilaterally attempting to impose quick fixes to restore equilibrium because, lets be honest, sometimes we find it hard to resist hiding our confusion.
To admit that I am lost in an “Oh, No!” moment opens the door not only to the fear of losing authority but also to a plethora of other troubling emotions and thoughts: *Shame and loss of face: “You’ll look like a fool!” * Panic and loss of control: “You’ve let this get out of hand!” * Incompetence and incapacitation: “You don’t know what you’re doing!”
As if by saying “I’m at a loss here” is tantamount to declaring “I am not fit to lead.” Of course the real problem for me and any other leader is if they don’t admit when they are disoriented, it sends a signal to others in the organisation stating it’s not cool to be lost and that, by its very nature encourages them to hide. What’s the saying about ‘a real man never asks for direction. ..so they end up driving around in circles’.
As managers we need to embrace the confusion, show vulnerability (remember that’s not a bad word) and accept that leadership is not about pretending to have all the answers but about having the courage to search with others to discover a solution.
JM point out that “being confused, however, does not mean being incapacitated. Indeed, one of the most liberating truths of leadership is that confusion is not quicksand from which to escape but rather the potter’s clay of leadership – the very stuff with which managers can work.”
2020 has certainly been a year to remember and all indications are that the confusion which has characterised this year will still follow us into the New Year, thereby making confusion a defining characteristic of the new normal and how managers need to manage. Our competence as leaders will then surely be measured not only by ‘what I know’ but increasingly by ‘how I behave when I accept, I don’t know, lose my sense of direction and become confused.
.I guess the message for all organizational cultures going forward is that sticking with the belief that we need all-knowing, omni-competent executives will cost them dearly and send a message to managers that it is better to hide their confusion than to address it openly and constructively.
Take comfort in these wise words ‘Confusion is a word we have invented for an order not yet understood’!