Connect with us
Advertisement

Questions on the Universe

Benson C Sail
THIS EARTH, MY BROTHER

Today we answer questions pertaining to this artificial universe

IS IT TRUE THAT THE UNIVERSE IS BECOMING LARGER BY THE SECOND?

The universe is actually expanding by a rate manifold quicker than a second. The thesis of an expanding or contracting universe was put forward by Albert Einstein in his Theory of General Relativity in 1915. In 1931, Edward Hubble, after whom the iconic Hubble Telescope is named, showed that what Einstein said was indeed true: the universe not only was expanding but accelerating. The space between galaxies was stretching, like dough rising in the oven. 

In the process, galaxies were moving away from us and the further a galaxy was, the faster it got away from us. Since the space between the galaxies was increasing, it followed as a matter of course that the universe was getting larger. Since the human body is a miniature version of the universe, it is reckoned that our molecules are also drifting away from each other. I shudder to think of the ramifications of such. Will mankind have his own personalised “Big Bang” in the form of an explosion or implosion?

AT WHAT STAGE DO YOU THINK WE WILL BE ABLE TO VISIT OTHER STAR SYSTEMS?


We already are. For instance, we have been to the Zeta Reticuli star system as I related in the Zeta Series. We have the technology to travel far and wide in the vast expanse of the Milky Way Galaxy. We have technology that can create a worm hole (a short-cut between two locations light years apart).   The highly popular television series, Stargate SG-1, which was aired to Western audiences for ten years from 1997 to 2007, was not sci-fi (science fiction) as many a people believe: i

t was fact-based. Whistleblowers who have personally participated in such “portal technologies” include Corey Good, Henry Deacon, and Dan Burish. You can listen to/read their revelations on Project Camelot, a website that exposes top secret Illuminati projects and intrigues. Perhaps your question should have been, WHEN WILL INTERSTELLAR TRAVEL BE MAINSTREAMED TO MANKIND?  My hunch tells me that will be at the beginning of a new zodiacal age – the Age of Aquarius, which mathematically dawns between the years  2100 and 2160.

WILL MANKIND BE ABLE SOME DAY TO CREATE A SPACESHIP CAPABLE OF TRAVELLING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT?

There’s no need to. Both warp drive and wormholes, also known as Einstein-Rosen Bridges,  make it possible to effectively cover inconceivably vast distances between two points in the universe faster than the speed of light.  It is not that the mode of transport involved itself  has to travel at a speed that transcends light: it is simply that warp drive and worm holes have the effect of folding space (like you fold a sheet of paper) so that two places that were incomprehensibly further apart now draw closer to each other. With this kind of technology, the necessity to come up with a spaceship that travels at the speed of light does not arise.

IS IT TRUE THAT ASTRONAUTS GROW TALLER THE LONGER THEY STAY IN SPACE?

It is yes: that’s what has been the experience of astronauts who have spent months on the International Space Station in Earth’s orbit.  They have had a height boost of 3 percent, so that if for argument’s sake one was 6 feet tall, he eventually comes to stand at 6 foot 2. This is because when the spine is not subject to Earth’s gravitational pull, the vertebrae can expand and relax, thus making the astronaut taller.  However, the gain in height lasts only for as long as the astronaut is in orbit: when  he returns to Earth, he reverts to his normal height after a few months.

WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THE FLAT-EARTH PROPOSITION?

It is nonsensical. All celestial bodies are spherical, not perfectly so but substantially so. Just look at the moon. Even amateur astronomers using a home-made telescope see a spherical Jupiter, Mars, Venus, etc. Why should Earth  be the only exception?

HOW MUCH DOES  THE US SPEND ON SPACE EXPLORATION PER ANNUM? IS IT WORTH IT?

The US spends an average of $23 billion per year on NASA. The figure sounds extravagant given that there are a whole host of socio-economic priorities that need to be attended to. But that is less than 1 percent of every tax dollar.    That is to say, 99 out of 100 cents of tax revenue go to fund other national imperatives. From a global perspective, however, the sum is extravagant. In 2019, NASA’s budget amounted to $21.5 billion, which represented 0.49 percent of the US’s $4.4 trillion fiscal expenditure budget.

Imagine if that $21 billion was spent on combating poverty, disease,  and unemployment across the globe! The world would be a by far better place. All the same, we have to bear in mind that it is important, if not crucial, that we understand the universe in which we live if we are  to best harness the possibilities it offers. So whilst we may deplore the US’s expenditure on NASA in the context of overarching global priorities, we should be grateful of the role the country has played in helping mankind unlock the mysteries of the universe.

WHY DOES SPACE APPEAR PITCH-BLACK IN COLOUR WHEN IT IS FILLED WITH SO MANY CELESTIAL TORCHES IN THE FORM OF STARS?

Darkness is conventionally the absence  of light. During the day, space is blue in colour because blue is the colour reflected the most when the atmosphere scatters the beams of sunlight, which is actually not white but is made up  of at least 7 colours (on celestial bodies without an atmosphere or with a thin atmosphere, notably the moon, space appears black all-day-long and all-night-long).    At night, space is black in colour from the point of view of Earth because there’s no sunlight to reflect colour.

True, space teems with billions if not trillion of stars, the vast majority of which emit light and so by rights it is supposed to be bathed in light. However, the Solar  System is on the edge of the Milky Way Galaxy.  Our location is one of the furthest from the galactic centre. In stellar systems that are closer to the galactic centre, space appears bright because of the concentration of stars.  Bear in mind that it could take billions of years for light from one star to reach the Solar System. Since the Solar System is very young, about 13 billion years old, the greater amount of light from the stars hasn’t reached us yet and so we see far fewer stars. But when our Solar System is reasonably old and much of the light from the galactic stars begin to strike us, space no longer will appear black:  it will be bright through and through.  

BEN, HELP OUT HERE:  IF YOU GO OFF INTO SPACE, TRAVELING NEAR THE SPEED OF LIGHT, AND YOU RETURN TO EARTH, WOULD YOU FIND YOUR TWIN, WHO HAD STAYED ON EARTH, SIGNIFICANTLY OLDER THAN YOU?

Albert Einstein calculated that the closer one travels to the speed of light, the slower the rate at which they will age because time slows down. Both the biological and mechanical clocks, it has been scientifically demonstrated, tick slower at accelerated motion. The natural metabolic processes slow down significantly, which means the rate of the body’s wear and tear slow down substantially too. So the twin who travelled will return to Earth looking nearly the same age he did when he left, whereas the one who remained will have aged by the number of years the travelling twin was away.   

WHY DO ASTRONAUTS WHO ORBIT EARTH AGE SLOWER THAN PEOPLE WHO STAY ON EARTH WHEN WITH THE REDUCED GRAVITY IN SPACE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO AGE FASTER?

After spending six months on the International Space Station, astronauts have aged 0.005 seconds LESS than the rest of mankind, which is negligible in the greater scheme of things but is still scientifically significant. According to Albert Einstein, time must move slower as gravity increases. The astronaut is some 260 miles above Earth and hence the force of gravity he’s subjected to must be lesser. As such, he is supposed to age at a faster rate than his fellow Earthlings back on Earth. 

But why do the astronauts to the contrary age slower than the rest of us whilst they are in space? They have a mitigating factor in the form of the space station they ride on. The space station is whizzing around Earth at   about 5 miles per second. Ultimately, the space station speed has a higher effect on their bodies than the reduced gravitational pull of the Earth, as a result of which they on balance age slower than us when ideally they should be aging quicker than us.

I RECENTLY WATCHED A DOCUMENTARY ON YOUTUBE WHICH SUGGESTS THAT THE SUN IS IN FACT A DOORWAY INTO AND OUT OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM. YOUR TAKE?

Bogus illuminati science, the kind that is taught in the classroom, avers that the sun is a really hot celestial body, with temperatures reaching up to 27 million Fahrenheit. That is not true. The sun does not operate on the basis of nuclear fission, as we have wrongly been made to believe: it operates on the basis of COLD FUSION. The sun is a very cold heavenly object. Yes, we feel the sun’s heat here on Earth at certain seasons during daytime, but what produces the heat is not the sun: it is the atmosphere.

That’s why the higher you go in the atmosphere, the cooler it gets because the atmosphere becomes thinner. If you stood just a few km above the atmospheric envelope, you would not roast to death: you would freeze to death. Space is ice-cold because the sun emits ice-cold rays. That’s why the argument that the sun is a portal for spacefaring civilisation from other star systems is very persuasive. Whistleblower Corey Goode spent six months in a scientific research vessel belonging to the Solar Warden Space Program (a secret space program run by the U.S. Navy which is responsible for monitoring all incoming and outgoing traffic in the solar system), whereby he witnessed probes being launched into sunspots to study the sun’s composition and behaviour, something possible only if the sun is a cold place and not a blazing hot one.

Goode says probes launched into sunspots showed that the sun contained spiral plasma filaments that stretched all the way from above the sun’s surface to its core and that under the right conditions, these solar filaments could be used as stargates or portals whereby extraterrestrial civilisations can enter or leave our solar system. Goode went on to reveal that there is a “hyperdimensional mathematical model” that links all the suns in our galaxy, which was given to the Solar Warden program by extraterrestrials.  Goode also discusses “nodes” (natural portals) found all over the world, such as in the Bermuda Triangle, that open and close unpredictably. When activated, these nodes can transport ships and aircraft caught within them through hyperdimensional space to anywhere in the galaxy.

COULD YOU PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT TO THE CONCEPT OF PARALLEL UNIVERSE?

Actually, parallel universes are not just a concept: they are an existing reality. As beings who carry First Source’s genetic signature, we have the capacity to be everywhere at once and experience all possibility. We do this through what are known as parallel universes. Let us take Jack Kennedy, the legendary US President. He was gunned down in November 1962. But that is in this universe: in another parallel universe, his assassination was actually foiled thanks to the instrumentality of Lee Harvey Osward.

In yet other parallel universes, Adolf Hitler won the Second World War; the US and the Soviet Union went to war; and George Bush, Tony Blair, Henry Kissinger, and Bibi Netanyahu were tried, convicted, and hung for crimes against humanity.  But it seems the rules of Superuniverse 7, where we dwell and in which countless parallel universes obtain, is to be conscious of only one particular parallel universe in one’s life time. Much of our dream scenarios constitute snippets of our experiences in parallel universes.

DO YOU KNOW OF ANY PLACE WHERE A STARGATE CAN BE FOUND?

Yes, courtesy of whistleblowers. I’m aware of at least 20 but I will cite only a few. They are the Bermuda Triangle; the Nazca Lines in Peru;  Mount Shasta; Lake Titicaca; the Sinai Peninsula; the Giza Pyramid; Tibet; Pine Gap in Australia; and the North and South Poles.

WHAT LEVEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT ARE WE AT AS EARTHLINGS? AND WHEN ARE WE LIKELY TO PROGRESS TO THE NEXT STAGE?

According to the Kardashev Scale, which was postulated by the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev in 1964, we are verging on a Type 1 civilisation. Carl Sagan was more specific: he said we were at 0.7, way less than 1.  A Type 1 Civilisation is one which can use and store all the energy available on its planet. There are two levels above ours, Type 2 civilisation (this can control and use energy from its star and the entire planetary system) and Type 3 civilisation (this can control energy in the entire galaxy). Writing in 2011, the renowned physicist Michio Kaku said mankind would be able to attain Type 2 status in 100 years.
 

ALL THE GREAT SPIRITUAL SAGES OF OLD WERE VEGETARIANS AND THUS THEY WERE MORE IN TUNE WITH THE UNIVERSE THAN WE ARE. SHOULD WE ALL BE VEGETARIANS IN THAT REGARD?

It is not what goes into your body that makes you wiser and much more perceptive: it is what comes out of you – through the words you utter, the emotions and thoughts you broadcast all around, and the actions you engage in. Experiments have long demonstrated that plants just like animals feel pain. They are living organisms just like humans and animals are. Thus a vegetarian is no more or less holy than one who gorges on beef or pork. Everything is sentient. Everything has a conscience, including rocks, though the level of sophistication of the conscience varies between life forms.
 

NEXT WEEK:   QUESTIONS ON THE PLANET OF THE GODS

Continue Reading

Columns

GONE FISHING

28th March 2023

In recent years, using personal devices in working environments has become so commonplace it now has its own acronym, BOYD (Bring Your Own Device).  But as employees skip between corporate tools and personal applications on their own devices, their actions introduce a number of possible risks that should be managed and mitigated with careful consideration.  Consider these examples:

Si-lwli, a small family-run business in Wales, is arguably as niche a company as you could find, producing talking toys used to promote the Welsh language. Their potential market is small, with only some 300,000 Welsh language speakers in the world and in reality the business is really more of a hobby for the husband-and-wife team, who both still have day jobs.  Yet, despite still managing to be successful in terms of sales, the business is now fighting for survival after recently falling prey to cybercriminals. Emails between Si-Iwli and their Chinese suppliers were intercepted by hackers who altered the banking details in the correspondence, causing Si-Iwli to hand over £18,000 (around P ¼ m) to the thieves. That might not sound much to a large enterprise, but to a small or medium business it can be devastating.

Another recent SMB hacking story which appeared in the Wall Street Journal concerned Innovative Higher Ed Consulting (IHED) Inc, a small New York start-up with a handful of employees. IHED didn’t even have a website, but fraudsters were able to run stolen credit card numbers through the company’s payment system and reverse the charges to the tune of $27,000, around the same loss faced by Si-Iwli.  As the WSJ put it, the hackers completely destroyed the company, forcing its owners to fold.

And in May 2019, the city of Baltimore’s computer system was hit by a ransomware attack, with hackers using a variant called RobinHood. The hack, which has lasted more than a month, paralysed the computer system for city employees, with the hackers demanding a payment in Bitcoin to give access back to the city.

Of course, hackers target governments or business giants  but small and medium businesses are certainly not immune. In fact, 67% of SMBs reported that they had experienced a cyber attack across a period of 12 months, according to a 2018 survey carried out by security research firm Ponemon Institute. Additionally, Verizon issued a report in May 2019 that small businesses accounted for 43% of its reported data breaches.  Once seen as less vulnerable than PCs, smartphone attacks are on the rise, with movements like the Dark Caracal spyware campaign underlining the allure of mobile devices to hackers. Last year, the US Federal Trade Commission released a statement calling for greater education on mobile security, coming at a time when around 42% of all Android devices are believed to not carry the latest security updates.

This is an era when employees increasingly use their smartphones for work-related purposes so is your business doing enough to protect against data breaches on their employees’ phones? The SME Cyber Crime Survey 2018 carried out for risk management specialists AON showed that more than 80% of small businesses did not view this as a threat yet if as shown, 67% of SMBs were said to have been victims of hacking, either the stats are wrong or business owners are underestimating their vulnerability.  A 2019 report by PricewaterhouseCoopers suggests the latter, stating that the majority of global businesses are unprepared for cyber attacks.

Consider that a workstation no longer means a desk in an office: It can be a phone in the back of a taxi or Uber; a laptop in a coffee shop, or a tablet in an airport lounge.  Wherever the device is used, employees can potentially install applications that could be harmful to your business, even from something as seemingly insignificant as clicking on an accidental download or opening a link on a phishing email.  Out of the physical workplace, your employees’ activities might not have the same protections as they would on a company-monitored PC.

Yet many businesses not only encourage their employees to work remotely, but assume working from coffee shops, bookstores, and airports can boost employees’ productivity.  Unfortunately, many remote hot spots do not provide secure Wi-Fi so if your employee is accessing their work account on unsecured public Wi-Fi,  sensitive business data could be at risk. Furthermore, even if your employee uses a company smartphone or has access to company data through a personal mobile device, there is always a chance data could be in jeopardy with a lost or stolen device, even information as basic as clients’ addresses and phone numbers.

BOYDs are also at risk from malware designed to harm and infect the host system, transmittable to smartphones when downloading malicious third-party apps.  Then there is ransomware, a type of malware used by hackers to specifically take control of a system’s data, blocking access or threatening to release sensitive information unless a ransom is paid such as the one which affected Baltimore.  Ransomware attacks are on the increase,  predicted to occur every 14 seconds, potentially costing billions of dollars per year.

Lastly there is phishing – the cyber equivalent of the metaphorical fishing exercise –  whereby  cybercriminals attempt to obtain sensitive data –usernames, passwords, credit card details –usually through a phoney email designed to look legitimate which directs the user to a fraudulent website or requests the data be emailed back directly. Most of us like to think we could recognize a phishing email when we see it, but these emails have become more sophisticated and can come through other forms of communication such as messaging apps.

Bottom line is to be aware of the potential problems with BOYDs and if in doubt,  consult your IT security consultants.  You can’t put the own-device genie back in the bottle but you can make data protection one of your three wishes!

Continue Reading

Columns

“I Propose to Diana Tonight”

28th March 2023

About five days before Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed landed in Paris, General Atiku, a certain Edward Williams was taking a walk in a woods in the Welsh town of Mountain Ash. Williams, then 73, was a psychic of some renown. He had in the past foretold assassination attempts on US President Ronald Reagan, which occurred on March 30, 1981, and Pope John Paul II, which came to pass on May 13, 1981.

As he trudged the woods, Williams  had a sudden premonition that pointed to Diana’s imminent fate as per Christopher Andersen’s book The Day Diana Died. “When the vision struck me, it was as if everything around me was obscured and replaced by shadowy figures,” Williams was later to reminisce. “In the middle was the face of Princess Diana. Her expression was sad and full of pathos. She was wearing what looked like a floral dress with a short dark cardigan. But it was vague. I went cold with fear and knew it was a sign that she was in danger.”

Williams hastily beat a retreat to his home, which he shared with his wife Mary, and related to her his presentiment, trembling like an aspen leaf as he did so. “I have never seen him so upset,” Mary recounted. “He felt he was given a sign and when he came back from his walk he was deeply shaken.”

The following day, Williams frantically sauntered into a police station to inform the police of his premonition. The officer who attended to him would have dismissed him as no more than a crackpot but he treated him seriously in view of the accuracy of his past predictions. He  took a statement and immediately passed it on to the Special Branch Investigative  Unit.

The report read as follows:

“On 27 August, at 14:12 hrs, a man by the name of Edward Williams came to Mountain Ash police station. He said he was a psychic and predicted that Princess Diana was going to die. In previous years, he has predicted that the Pope and Ronald Reagan were going to be the victims of assassination attempts. On both occasions he was proved to be correct. Mr Williams appeared to be quite normal.”

Williams, General, was spot-on as usual: four days later, the princess was no more.

Meanwhile, General,  even as Dodi and Diana were making their way to the Fayed-owned Ritz Hotel in central Paris, British newspapers were awash with headlines that suggested Diana was kind of deranged. Writes Andrew Morton in Diana in Pursuit of Love: “In The Independent Diana was described as ‘a woman with fundamentally nothing to say about anything’. She was ‘suffering from a form of arrested development’. ‘Isn’t it time she started using her head?’ asked The Mail on Sunday. The Sunday Mirror printed a special supplement entitled ‘A Story of Love’; The News of the World claimed that William had demanded that Diana should split from Dodi: ‘William can’t help it, he just doesn’t like the man.’ William was reportedly ‘horrified’ and ‘doesn’t think Mr Fayed is good for his mother’ – or was that just the press projecting their own prejudices? The upmarket Sunday Times newspaper, which had first serialised my biography of the princess, now put her in the psychiatrist’s chair for daring to be wooed by a Muslim. The pop-psychologist Oliver James put Diana ‘On the Couch’, asking why she was so ‘depressed’ and desperate for love. Other tabloids piled in with dire prognostications – about Prince Philip’s hostility to the relationship, Diana’s prospect of exile, and the social ostracism she would face if she married Dodi.”

DIANA AND DODI AT THE RITZ

Before Diana and Dodi departed the Villa Windsor sometime after 16 hrs, General, one of Dodi’s bodyguards Trevor Rees-Jones furtively asked Diana as to what the programme for the evening was. This Trevor did out of sheer desperation as Dodi had ceased and desisted from telling members of his security detail, let alone anyone else for that matter, what his onward destination was for fear that that piece of information would be passed on to the paparazzi. Diana kindly obliged Trevor though her response was terse and scarcely revealing. “Well, eventually we will be going out to a restaurant”, that was all Diana said. Without advance knowledge of exactly what restaurant that was, Trevor and his colleagues’ hands were tied: they could not do a recce on it as was standard practice for the security team of a VIP principal.  Dodi certainly, General, was being recklessly by throwing such caution to the winds.

At about 16:30, Diana and Dodi drew up at the Ritz Hotel, where they were received by acting hotel manager Claude Roulet.  The front entrance of the hotel was already crawling with paparazzi, as a result of which the couple took the precaution of using the rear entrance, where hopefully they would make their entry unperturbed and unmolested. The first thing they did when they were ensconced in the now $10,000 a night Imperial Suite was to spend some time on their mobiles and set about touching base with friends, relations, and associates.  Diana called at least two people, her clairvoyant friend Rita Rogers and her favourite journalist Richard Kay of The Daily Mail.

Rita, General,  was alarmed that Diana had proceeded to venture to Paris notwithstanding the warning she had given Dodi and herself in relation to what she had seen of him  in the crystal ball when the couple had consulted her. When quizzed as to what the hell she indeed was doing in Paris at that juncture, Diana replied that she and Dodi had simply come to do some shopping, which though partially true was not the material reason they were there. “But Diana, remember what I told Dodi,” Rita said somewhat reprovingly. Diana a bit apprehensively replied, “Yes I remember. I will be careful. I promise.” Well,  she did not live up to her promise as we shall soon unpack General.

As for Richard Kay, Diana made known to him that, “I have decided I am going to radically change my life. I am going to complete my obligations to charities and to the anti-personnel land mines cause, but in November I want to completely withdraw from formal public life.”

Once she was done with her round of calls, Diana went down to the hair saloon by the hotel swimming pool to have her hair washed and blow-dried ahead of the scheduled evening dinner.

THE “TELL ME YES” RING IS DELIVERED

Since the main object of their Paris trip was to pick up the “Tell Me Yes” engagement ring  Dodi had ordered in Monte Carlo a week earlier, Dodi decided to check on Repossi Jewellery, which was right within the Ritz prencincts, known as the Place Vendome.  It could have taken less than a minute for Dodi to get to the store on foot but he decided to use a car to outsmart the paparazzi invasion. He was driven there by Trevor Rees-Jones, with Alexander Kez Wingfield and Claude Roulet following on foot, though he entered the shop alone.

The Repossi store had closed for the holiday season but Alberto Repossi, accompanied by his wife and brother-in-law,  had decided to travel all the way from his home in Monaco  and momentarily open it for the sake of the potentially highly lucrative  Dodi transaction.  Alberto, however, disappointed Dodi as the ring he had chosen was not the one  he produced. The one he showed Dodi was pricier and perhaps more exquisite but Dodi  was adamant that he wanted the exact one he had ordered as that was what Diana herself had picked. It was a ploy  on the part of Repossi to make a real killing on the sale, his excuse to that effect being that Diana deserved a ring tha was well worthy of her social pedigree.  With Dodi having expressed disaffection, Repossi rendered his apologies and assured Dodi he would make the right ring available shortly, whereupon Dodi repaired back to the hotel to await its delivery. But Dodi  did insist nonetheless that the pricier ring be delivered too in case it appealed to Diana anyway.

Repossi delivered the two rings an hour later. They were collected by Roulet. On inspecting them, Dodi chose the very one he had seen in Monte Carlo, apparently at the insistence of Diana.  There is a possibility that Diana, who was very much aware of her public image and was not comfortable with ostentatious displays of wealth, may have deliberately shown an interest in a less expensive engagement ring. It  may have been a purely romantic as opposed to a prestigious  choice for her.

The value of the ring, which was found on a wardrobe shelf in Dodi’s apartment after the crash,  has been estimated to be between $20,000 and $250,000 as Repossi has always refused to be drawn into revealing how much Dodi paid for it. The sum, which enjoyed a 25 percent discount, was in truth paid for not by Dodi himself but by his father as was the usual practice.

Dodi was also shown Repossi’s sketches for a bracelet, a watch, and earrings which he proposed to create if Diana approved of them.

DIANA AND DODI GUSH OVER IMMINENT NUPTIALS

At about 7 pm,  Dodi and Diana left the Ritz and headed for Dodi’s apartment at a place known as the Arc de Trompe. They went there to properly tog themselves out for the scheduled evening dinner. They spent two hours at the luxurious apartment. As usual, the ubiquitous paparazzi were patiently waiting for them there.

As they lingered in the apartment, Dodi beckoned over to his butler Rene Delorm  and showed him  the engagement ring. “Dodi came into my kitchen,” Delorm relates. “He looked into the hallway to check that Diana couldn’t hear and reached into his pocket and pulled out the box … He said, ‘Rene, I’m going to propose to the princess tonight. Make sure that we have champagne on ice when we come back from dinner’.” Rene described the ring as “a spectacular diamond encrusted ring, a massive emerald surrounded by a cluster of diamonds, set on a yellow and white gold band sitting in a small light-grey velvet box”.

Just before 9 pm, Dodi called the brother of his step-father, Hassan Yassen, who also was staying at the Ritz  that night, and told him that he hoped to get married to Diana by the end of the year.

Later that same evening, both Dodi and Diana would talk to Mohamed Al Fayed, Dodi’s dad, and make known to him their pre-nuptial intentions. “They called me and said we’re coming back  (to London) on Sunday (August 31) and on Monday (September 1) they are

Continue Reading

Columns

RAMADAN – The Blessed Month of Fasting

28th March 2023

Ramadan is the fasting month for Muslims, where over one billion Muslims throughout the world fast from dawn to sunset, and pray additional prayers at night. It is a time for inner reflection, devotion to Allah, and self-control. It is the ninth month in the Islamic calendar. As you read this Muslims the world over have already begun fasting as the month of Ramadan has commenced (depending on the sighting of the new moon).

‘The month of Ramadan is that in which the Qur’an was revealed as guidance for people, in it are clear signs of guidance and Criterion, therefore whoever of you who witnesses this month, it is obligatory on him to fast it. But whoever is ill or traveling let him fast the same number of other days, God desires ease for you and not hardship, and He desires that you complete the ordained period and glorify God for His guidance to you, that you may be grateful”. Holy Qur’an  (2 : 185)

Fasting during Ramadan is one of the five pillars upon which the structure of Islam is built. The other four are: the declaration of one’s belief in Allah’s oneness and in the message of Muhammad (PBUH); regular attendance to prayer; payment of zakaat (obligatory charity); and the pilgrimage to Mecca.

As explained in an earlier article, fasting includes total abstinence from eating, drinking, smoking, refraining from obscenity, avoiding getting into arguments and including abstaining from marital relations, from sunrise to sunset. While fasting may appear to some as difficult Muslims see it as an opportunity to get closer to their Lord, a chance to develop spiritually and at the same time the act of fasting builds character, discipline and self-restraint.

Just as our cars require servicing at regular intervals, so do Muslims consider Ramadan as a month in which the body and spirit undergoes as it were a ‘full service’. This ‘service’ includes heightened spiritual awareness both the mental and physical aspects and also the body undergoing a process of detoxification and some of the organs get to ‘rest’ through fasting.

Because of the intensive devotional activity fasting, Ramadan has a particularly high importance, derived from its very personal nature as an act of worship but there is nothing to stop anyone from privately violating Allah’s commandment of fasting if one chooses to do so by claiming to be fasting yet eating on the sly. This means that although fasting is obligatory, its observance is purely voluntary. If a person claims to be a Muslim, he is expected to fast in Ramadan.

 

The reward Allah gives for proper fasting is very generous. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) quotes Allah as saying: “All actions done by a human being are his own except fasting, which belongs to Me and I will reward it accordingly.” We are also told by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that the reward for proper fasting is admittance into heaven.

Fasting earns great reward when it is done in a ‘proper’ manner. This is because every Muslim is required to make his worship perfect. For example perfection of fasting can be achieved through restraint of one’s feelings and emotions. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said that when fasting, a person should not allow himself to be drawn into a quarrel or a slanging match. He teaches us: “On a day of fasting, let no one of you indulge in any obscenity, or enter into a slanging match. Should someone abuse or fight him, let him respond by saying: ‘I am fasting!’”

This high standard of self-restraint fits in well with fasting, which is considered as an act of self-discipline. Islam requires us to couple patience with voluntary abstention from indulgence in our physical desires. The purpose of fasting helps man to attain a high degree of sublimity, discipline and self-restraint. In other words, this standard CAN BE achieved by every Muslim who knows the purpose of fasting and strives to fulfill it.

Fasting has another special aspect. It makes all people share in the feelings of hunger and thirst. In normal circumstances, people with decent income may go from one year’s end to another without experiencing the pangs of hunger which a poor person may feel every day of his life. Such an experience helps to draw the rich one’s conscience nearer to needs of the poor. A Muslim is encouraged to be more charitable and learns to give generously for a good cause.

Fasting also has a universal or communal aspect to it. As Muslims throughout the world share in this blessed act of worship, their sense of unity is enhanced by the fact that every Muslim individual joins willingly in the fulfillment of this divine commandment. This is a unity of action and purpose, since they all fast in order to be better human beings. As a person restrains himself from the things he desires most, in the hope that he will earn Allah’s pleasure, self-discipline and sacrifice become part of his nature.

The month of Ramadan can aptly be described as a “season of worship.” Fasting is the main aspect of worship in this month, because people are more attentive to their prayers, read the Qur’an more frequently and also strive to improve on their inner and outer character. Thus, their devotion is more complete and they feel much happier in Ramadan because they feel themselves to be closer to their Creator.

Continue Reading