Connect with us
Advertisement

Questions on the Universe

Benson C Sail
THIS EARTH, MY BROTHER

Today we answer questions pertaining to this artificial universe

IS IT TRUE THAT THE UNIVERSE IS BECOMING LARGER BY THE SECOND?

The universe is actually expanding by a rate manifold quicker than a second. The thesis of an expanding or contracting universe was put forward by Albert Einstein in his Theory of General Relativity in 1915. In 1931, Edward Hubble, after whom the iconic Hubble Telescope is named, showed that what Einstein said was indeed true: the universe not only was expanding but accelerating. The space between galaxies was stretching, like dough rising in the oven. 

In the process, galaxies were moving away from us and the further a galaxy was, the faster it got away from us. Since the space between the galaxies was increasing, it followed as a matter of course that the universe was getting larger. Since the human body is a miniature version of the universe, it is reckoned that our molecules are also drifting away from each other. I shudder to think of the ramifications of such. Will mankind have his own personalised “Big Bang” in the form of an explosion or implosion?

AT WHAT STAGE DO YOU THINK WE WILL BE ABLE TO VISIT OTHER STAR SYSTEMS?


We already are. For instance, we have been to the Zeta Reticuli star system as I related in the Zeta Series. We have the technology to travel far and wide in the vast expanse of the Milky Way Galaxy. We have technology that can create a worm hole (a short-cut between two locations light years apart).   The highly popular television series, Stargate SG-1, which was aired to Western audiences for ten years from 1997 to 2007, was not sci-fi (science fiction) as many a people believe: i

t was fact-based. Whistleblowers who have personally participated in such “portal technologies” include Corey Good, Henry Deacon, and Dan Burish. You can listen to/read their revelations on Project Camelot, a website that exposes top secret Illuminati projects and intrigues. Perhaps your question should have been, WHEN WILL INTERSTELLAR TRAVEL BE MAINSTREAMED TO MANKIND?  My hunch tells me that will be at the beginning of a new zodiacal age – the Age of Aquarius, which mathematically dawns between the years  2100 and 2160.

WILL MANKIND BE ABLE SOME DAY TO CREATE A SPACESHIP CAPABLE OF TRAVELLING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT?

There’s no need to. Both warp drive and wormholes, also known as Einstein-Rosen Bridges,  make it possible to effectively cover inconceivably vast distances between two points in the universe faster than the speed of light.  It is not that the mode of transport involved itself  has to travel at a speed that transcends light: it is simply that warp drive and worm holes have the effect of folding space (like you fold a sheet of paper) so that two places that were incomprehensibly further apart now draw closer to each other. With this kind of technology, the necessity to come up with a spaceship that travels at the speed of light does not arise.

IS IT TRUE THAT ASTRONAUTS GROW TALLER THE LONGER THEY STAY IN SPACE?

It is yes: that’s what has been the experience of astronauts who have spent months on the International Space Station in Earth’s orbit.  They have had a height boost of 3 percent, so that if for argument’s sake one was 6 feet tall, he eventually comes to stand at 6 foot 2. This is because when the spine is not subject to Earth’s gravitational pull, the vertebrae can expand and relax, thus making the astronaut taller.  However, the gain in height lasts only for as long as the astronaut is in orbit: when  he returns to Earth, he reverts to his normal height after a few months.

WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THE FLAT-EARTH PROPOSITION?

It is nonsensical. All celestial bodies are spherical, not perfectly so but substantially so. Just look at the moon. Even amateur astronomers using a home-made telescope see a spherical Jupiter, Mars, Venus, etc. Why should Earth  be the only exception?

HOW MUCH DOES  THE US SPEND ON SPACE EXPLORATION PER ANNUM? IS IT WORTH IT?

The US spends an average of $23 billion per year on NASA. The figure sounds extravagant given that there are a whole host of socio-economic priorities that need to be attended to. But that is less than 1 percent of every tax dollar.    That is to say, 99 out of 100 cents of tax revenue go to fund other national imperatives. From a global perspective, however, the sum is extravagant. In 2019, NASA’s budget amounted to $21.5 billion, which represented 0.49 percent of the US’s $4.4 trillion fiscal expenditure budget.

Imagine if that $21 billion was spent on combating poverty, disease,  and unemployment across the globe! The world would be a by far better place. All the same, we have to bear in mind that it is important, if not crucial, that we understand the universe in which we live if we are  to best harness the possibilities it offers. So whilst we may deplore the US’s expenditure on NASA in the context of overarching global priorities, we should be grateful of the role the country has played in helping mankind unlock the mysteries of the universe.

WHY DOES SPACE APPEAR PITCH-BLACK IN COLOUR WHEN IT IS FILLED WITH SO MANY CELESTIAL TORCHES IN THE FORM OF STARS?

Darkness is conventionally the absence  of light. During the day, space is blue in colour because blue is the colour reflected the most when the atmosphere scatters the beams of sunlight, which is actually not white but is made up  of at least 7 colours (on celestial bodies without an atmosphere or with a thin atmosphere, notably the moon, space appears black all-day-long and all-night-long).    At night, space is black in colour from the point of view of Earth because there’s no sunlight to reflect colour.

True, space teems with billions if not trillion of stars, the vast majority of which emit light and so by rights it is supposed to be bathed in light. However, the Solar  System is on the edge of the Milky Way Galaxy.  Our location is one of the furthest from the galactic centre. In stellar systems that are closer to the galactic centre, space appears bright because of the concentration of stars.  Bear in mind that it could take billions of years for light from one star to reach the Solar System. Since the Solar System is very young, about 13 billion years old, the greater amount of light from the stars hasn’t reached us yet and so we see far fewer stars. But when our Solar System is reasonably old and much of the light from the galactic stars begin to strike us, space no longer will appear black:  it will be bright through and through.  

BEN, HELP OUT HERE:  IF YOU GO OFF INTO SPACE, TRAVELING NEAR THE SPEED OF LIGHT, AND YOU RETURN TO EARTH, WOULD YOU FIND YOUR TWIN, WHO HAD STAYED ON EARTH, SIGNIFICANTLY OLDER THAN YOU?

Albert Einstein calculated that the closer one travels to the speed of light, the slower the rate at which they will age because time slows down. Both the biological and mechanical clocks, it has been scientifically demonstrated, tick slower at accelerated motion. The natural metabolic processes slow down significantly, which means the rate of the body’s wear and tear slow down substantially too. So the twin who travelled will return to Earth looking nearly the same age he did when he left, whereas the one who remained will have aged by the number of years the travelling twin was away.   

WHY DO ASTRONAUTS WHO ORBIT EARTH AGE SLOWER THAN PEOPLE WHO STAY ON EARTH WHEN WITH THE REDUCED GRAVITY IN SPACE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO AGE FASTER?

After spending six months on the International Space Station, astronauts have aged 0.005 seconds LESS than the rest of mankind, which is negligible in the greater scheme of things but is still scientifically significant. According to Albert Einstein, time must move slower as gravity increases. The astronaut is some 260 miles above Earth and hence the force of gravity he’s subjected to must be lesser. As such, he is supposed to age at a faster rate than his fellow Earthlings back on Earth. 

But why do the astronauts to the contrary age slower than the rest of us whilst they are in space? They have a mitigating factor in the form of the space station they ride on. The space station is whizzing around Earth at   about 5 miles per second. Ultimately, the space station speed has a higher effect on their bodies than the reduced gravitational pull of the Earth, as a result of which they on balance age slower than us when ideally they should be aging quicker than us.

I RECENTLY WATCHED A DOCUMENTARY ON YOUTUBE WHICH SUGGESTS THAT THE SUN IS IN FACT A DOORWAY INTO AND OUT OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM. YOUR TAKE?

Bogus illuminati science, the kind that is taught in the classroom, avers that the sun is a really hot celestial body, with temperatures reaching up to 27 million Fahrenheit. That is not true. The sun does not operate on the basis of nuclear fission, as we have wrongly been made to believe: it operates on the basis of COLD FUSION. The sun is a very cold heavenly object. Yes, we feel the sun’s heat here on Earth at certain seasons during daytime, but what produces the heat is not the sun: it is the atmosphere.

That’s why the higher you go in the atmosphere, the cooler it gets because the atmosphere becomes thinner. If you stood just a few km above the atmospheric envelope, you would not roast to death: you would freeze to death. Space is ice-cold because the sun emits ice-cold rays. That’s why the argument that the sun is a portal for spacefaring civilisation from other star systems is very persuasive. Whistleblower Corey Goode spent six months in a scientific research vessel belonging to the Solar Warden Space Program (a secret space program run by the U.S. Navy which is responsible for monitoring all incoming and outgoing traffic in the solar system), whereby he witnessed probes being launched into sunspots to study the sun’s composition and behaviour, something possible only if the sun is a cold place and not a blazing hot one.

Goode says probes launched into sunspots showed that the sun contained spiral plasma filaments that stretched all the way from above the sun’s surface to its core and that under the right conditions, these solar filaments could be used as stargates or portals whereby extraterrestrial civilisations can enter or leave our solar system. Goode went on to reveal that there is a “hyperdimensional mathematical model” that links all the suns in our galaxy, which was given to the Solar Warden program by extraterrestrials.  Goode also discusses “nodes” (natural portals) found all over the world, such as in the Bermuda Triangle, that open and close unpredictably. When activated, these nodes can transport ships and aircraft caught within them through hyperdimensional space to anywhere in the galaxy.

COULD YOU PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT TO THE CONCEPT OF PARALLEL UNIVERSE?

Actually, parallel universes are not just a concept: they are an existing reality. As beings who carry First Source’s genetic signature, we have the capacity to be everywhere at once and experience all possibility. We do this through what are known as parallel universes. Let us take Jack Kennedy, the legendary US President. He was gunned down in November 1962. But that is in this universe: in another parallel universe, his assassination was actually foiled thanks to the instrumentality of Lee Harvey Osward.

In yet other parallel universes, Adolf Hitler won the Second World War; the US and the Soviet Union went to war; and George Bush, Tony Blair, Henry Kissinger, and Bibi Netanyahu were tried, convicted, and hung for crimes against humanity.  But it seems the rules of Superuniverse 7, where we dwell and in which countless parallel universes obtain, is to be conscious of only one particular parallel universe in one’s life time. Much of our dream scenarios constitute snippets of our experiences in parallel universes.

DO YOU KNOW OF ANY PLACE WHERE A STARGATE CAN BE FOUND?

Yes, courtesy of whistleblowers. I’m aware of at least 20 but I will cite only a few. They are the Bermuda Triangle; the Nazca Lines in Peru;  Mount Shasta; Lake Titicaca; the Sinai Peninsula; the Giza Pyramid; Tibet; Pine Gap in Australia; and the North and South Poles.

WHAT LEVEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT ARE WE AT AS EARTHLINGS? AND WHEN ARE WE LIKELY TO PROGRESS TO THE NEXT STAGE?

According to the Kardashev Scale, which was postulated by the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev in 1964, we are verging on a Type 1 civilisation. Carl Sagan was more specific: he said we were at 0.7, way less than 1.  A Type 1 Civilisation is one which can use and store all the energy available on its planet. There are two levels above ours, Type 2 civilisation (this can control and use energy from its star and the entire planetary system) and Type 3 civilisation (this can control energy in the entire galaxy). Writing in 2011, the renowned physicist Michio Kaku said mankind would be able to attain Type 2 status in 100 years.
 

ALL THE GREAT SPIRITUAL SAGES OF OLD WERE VEGETARIANS AND THUS THEY WERE MORE IN TUNE WITH THE UNIVERSE THAN WE ARE. SHOULD WE ALL BE VEGETARIANS IN THAT REGARD?

It is not what goes into your body that makes you wiser and much more perceptive: it is what comes out of you – through the words you utter, the emotions and thoughts you broadcast all around, and the actions you engage in. Experiments have long demonstrated that plants just like animals feel pain. They are living organisms just like humans and animals are. Thus a vegetarian is no more or less holy than one who gorges on beef or pork. Everything is sentient. Everything has a conscience, including rocks, though the level of sophistication of the conscience varies between life forms.
 

NEXT WEEK:   QUESTIONS ON THE PLANET OF THE GODS

Continue Reading

Columns

A Begrudged Child

21st June 2022

Princess Diana was at once a child of destiny and a victim of fate

It is no secret, General Atiku, that the British monarch constitutes one of the most moneyed families on this scandalously uneven planet of the perennial haves on the one hand and the goddamn havenots (such as you and me General) on the other hand.

In terms of residences alone, the House of Windsor lays claim to some 19 homes, some official, such as Buckingham Place and Windsor Castle, for instance, and the greater majority privately owned.
Arguably the most eminent of its private residences is Sandringham House at Sandringham Estate in Norfolk, England.

It is at this sprawling, 8,100-hectare estate the Queen spends two months each winter, at once commemorates her father King George VI’s death and her own accession to the throne, and more often than not celebrates Christmas. King George VI and his father King George V both drew their last breath here.

A 19th century Prince of Wales, Albert Edward (who would later become King Edward VII), acquired Sandringham in 1862 and it has remained royal property ever since. On the death of King George VI in February 1952, the property passed to his successor Queen Elizabeth II, the incumbent monarch, who assigned her husband Prince Phillip its management and upkeep. The estate also houses a parish, St. Mary Magdalene Church, which the outwardly religious Queen attends every Sunday.

Albert, General, had several additional properties built on the estate the year after he acquired it, one of which was the ten-bedroomed Park House. The house was built to accommodate the overflow of guests at Sandringham House. In the 1930s, King George V leased Park House to Maurice Roche, an Irishman and a bosom friend to his second son, who at the time was Duke of York but would in future be King George VI.

Roche was the 4th Baron Fermoy, a title in the Peerage of Ireland created by Queen Victoria way back in 1856. He and his wife Ruth had three children born at Park House, the second-born of whom was Frances Ruth Roche (futuristically Frances Shand Kydd), born in January 1936.

In 1956, Frances married John Spencer, a fellow noble, and following an “uneasy spell” at Althorp, the Spencer family estate of 500 years, the couple took up residence at Park House, which would be their home for the next 19 years. On July 1, 1961, Frances, then aged 25, and John, then aged 37, welcomed into the world their thirdborn child and youngest daughter, Diana Frances Spencer.

She would, on a positive note, become Her Royal Highness Princess Diana of Wales and the most famous and popular member of the Royal family. On the flip side of the coin, she would, as you well know General, become the most tragic member of the Royal family.

GIRL CHILD WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN A BOY

If there was one thought that constantly nagged at Diana as a youngster, General, it was the “guilt” of having been born anyway. Her parents first had two daughters in succession, namely Elizabeth Sarah, born in 1955, and Cynthia Jane, born in 1957. Johnnie was displeasured, if not downright incensed, that his wife seemed incapable of producing a male child – a heir – who he desperately needed as an aristocrat.

He even took the trouble of having his wife see a series of doctors in a bid to establish whatever deficiency she possessed in her genetic make-up and whether it was possible to correct it. At the time, General, it was not known that it is the man who determines a child’s sex and not the woman.

John’s prayers, if we can call them that General, were as much answered as they were unanswered. The longed-for male heir was born on January 12, 1960. Named John after his father, he was, as per the official version of things, practically stillborn, being so piteously deformed and gravely ill that he was dead in a matter of only ten hours, a development of which Earl Spencer would in future remark thus, albeit with tongue-in-cheek: “It was a dreadful time for my parents and probably the root of their divorce because I don’t think they ever got over it.”

Again as per the official version, General, John was gutted and hurriedly got into stride, this time around utterly positive that having had two daughters in succession, it would be two sons in succession. But nature, General, is seldom that predictable or orderly.

The next child was in fact a daughter, the now iconic Diana, for the third time around. Although John is recorded as having marvelled at what a “perfect physical specimen” her newly-born daughter was, he was forlorn beneath the façade, as a result of which Diana, who as a child did sense a lingering frustration on the part of her father on her account, would openly intuit that she was an unwelcome child, a “nuisance to have around”, thanks to her “failure” to be born a boy. From a very age thus, General, Diana had concluded that she was not well-fated and presciently so!

Although the heir, Charles Spencer (the future Earl Spencer) finally arrived on May 20, 1964, Diana perceived very little if any change in the way she was contemplated by her parents. In fact, both she and Charles could not desist from wondering whether had John lived, they would have been born at all. Seemingly, they came to be simply because their father was desperate for a heir and not necessarily that he wanted two more children.  With the birth of Charles, General, John called it a day as far as the process of procreation was concerned.

GODDESS OF THE HUNT

Why was Diana so named, General? Throughout her life, it was taken as an article of faith that her name derived from Lady Diana Spencer, a member of the Spencer clan who lived between 1710 and 1735, dying at a pitifully tender age of only 25. Certainly, the two namesakes turned out to have precious much in common as we shall unpack at a later stage, as if the latter-day Diana’s life was deliberately manoeuvred to more or less sync with the ancestral Diana.

It emerged, however, General, that the connection to an ancestor was actually secondary, or maybe incidental. The primary inspiration of the name was at long last disclosed by Earl Spencer on September 7, 1997, the day of Princess Diana’s burial. Delivering the elegantly crafted eulogy, Earl Spencer had this to say in relation to her naming: “It is a point to remember that of all the ironies about Diana, perhaps the greatest was this – a girl given the name of the ancient goddess of hunting was, in the end, the most hunted person of the modern age.”

It is significant, if not curious, General, that of John’s three daughters, only Diana was given the name of a goddess. Clearly, there must have been a special reason for this as aristocrats do not confer names casually: every name carries a metaphorical, symbolic, or intentional message. Typically, it honours an iconic personage or spirit or somebody lesser but who evokes memories anyway.

Elizabeth Sarah, for instance, was in all probability named after the Queen’s mother, whose decades-long inner circle included Diana’s paternal and maternal grandmothers, and an ancestor going by the name Sarah Jennings (1760-1744). Charles Spencer was named after the family’s greatest forbearer, King Charles 1 of England, Scotland, and Ireland from 1625-1649. The ill-fated John was of course named after his father, who in turn was likely named after the 5th Earl Spencer, John Poyntz Spencer (1835-1910).

On occasion in occultic families, as the Spencer family latterly have been, a name, General, connotes a bad futuristic omen associated with its bearer and that was precisely the case with Diana.

THE FIRST DIANA

In its ancient rendering, the name Diana meant “The Heavenly One”, or goddess being a feminine style. The first Diana, General, was Inanna, an Anunnaki goddess whose Akkadian name was Ishtar – Esther in English. As you well know General, the Anunnaki are the Old Testament gods, Aliens from the planet Nibiru, the Solar System’s little-known planet which is seen only once in 3600 years, and who came to Earth 432,000 years ago as we comprehensively set down in the Earth Chronicles series.

The name Inanna is Sumerian, the Sumerians being the best-known civilisation of old who thrived around modern-day Iraq (called Sumer in ancient times) about 6000 years ago and who were indirectly governed by the Anunnaki. It was abbreviated from Nin-An-Ak, meaning “Lady of Heaven and Earth” or “Lady of the God of Heaven and Earth”.

She was so-called, General, not because she had particularly special godly qualities but owing to the fact that she was the earthly mistress of Anu, “Our Father Who Art In Heaven”, the King of the planet Nibiru, which humans of the day perceived as Heaven.

Anu was the father of Enlil, the principal Jehovah of the Bible. Enlil in turn had a second-born son called Nannar-Sin, the first Anunnaki to be born on Earth and who eventually became the Allah of Islam. It was Sin who fathered Inanna. Thus Inanna was Anu’s great-granddaughter but every time he visited Earth, Anu was sexually entertained by the stunningly beautiful Inanna, an act which in Anunnaki culture was not frowned upon.

Inanna was amongst other appellations known as the Goddess of Hunting (because of her penchant for, and skill in, waging war) and the Goddess of Love (in the sense of licentious love-making and not conventional moral love). Her other names in different parts of the world and across the ages were Irnin; Anunitu (Beloved of Anu); Aphrodite; Ashtoreth; Astarte; and Artemis, to mention only a few.

Although her celestial counterpart was the planet Venus, she was also loosely associated with the constellation Virgo as well as the moon. Once upon a time, when she was a virgin, Virgo was dedicated to her by her grandfather Jehovah-Enlil, who was Earth’s Chief Executive until circa 2024 BC. With regard to the moon, it primarily had to do with her twin brother Utu-Shamash, whose celestial counterpart was the sun: as such, Inanna’s inevitably had to be the moon. That, however, was only in a putative sense in that the operative moon god of the day was her father Sin.

Since moonlight effectively turns darkness into relative daylight, Inanna has in legends been referred to as Diana Lucifera, the latter term meaning “light-bringer”. Inanna’s association with the moon, General, partly explains why she was called the “Heavenly One” since the moon is a heavenly body, that is, a firmament-based body. It also explains why she was also known as Luna, which is Latin for moon.

A STEERED LIFE FOR GOOD OR ILL

Now, children of royals, aristocrats and other such members of high society, General, are invariably named before they are born. True, when a Prince William or Prince George comes along, the word that is put out into the public domain is that several names have been bandied about and the preferred one will “soon be announced”. That, General, is utter hogwash.

No prince, princess, or any other member of the nobility for that matter, is named at or sometime after their birth. Two names, a feminine and a masculine one, are already finalised whilst the child is in the womb, so that the name the child eventually goes by will depend on no other factor beside its gender.

Princess Diana, General, was named a full week after her birth, as if consultations of some sort with certain overarching figures had to be concluded first and foremost. Apparently, the broader outlines of her future first had to be secretly mapped out and charted in the manner of a child of destiny, though in her case she was as much a child of destiny as she was a doomed child. In her childhood reminiscences, Diana does hint at having been tipped to the effect that she was a special child and therefore had to scrupulously preserve herself.

“I always felt very different from somebody else, very detached,” she told her biographer Andrew Morton as per his 1992 book Diana Her True Story – In Her Own Words. “I knew I was going somewhere different but had no idea where. I said to my father when I was 13, ‘I know I am going to marry someone in the public eye’.” That, General, speaks volumes on the deliberately designed grooming she was subjected to in the formative years of her pilgrimage in life.

Since it was repeatedly drummed in her highly impressionable mind that there was something big in store for her along the way, Diana, General, remained chaste throughout her upbringing, if not an outright virgin to in all probability conform to the profile of the goddess Diana/Inanna before she exploded into a lecherous, loose-mannered nymphomaniac in her adult life as we underscored in the Earth Chronicles series. “By the time I got to the top of the school,” Diana said to Morton, “all my friends had boyfriends but not me because I knew somehow that I had to keep myself very tidy for whatever was coming my way.”

A DISPARAGED BIRTH?

Unusual for an aristocrat, General, Diana was born not in the rather apt precincts of a high-end hospital but within the banality of Park House itself. Whether hired midwives were on hand to help usher her into the world or it was only her dad, mum and closer womenfolk relations who did we can only speculate.

If for one reason or the other her parents were desirous that she be delivered at home, what secret rites did they perform as her mother’s waters broke, General? What incantations, if at all, did John utter over her? Was her birth an occultic one with all the attendant paraphernalia as opposed to a conventional one?

That Diana’s arrival was not a particularly cherished event, General, is evidenced by the fact that she was christened within the Sandringham Estate, at St. Mary Magdalene Church, with only well-to-do commoners in attendance, whereas the more prized child, her younger brother Charles, was christened at Westminster Abbey, in the presence of the Queen, who was designated as his principal godmother.

Anyhow, it was just as well, General, that it was in the hallowed environs of St. Mary Magdalene Church that Diana was committed to the “The Lord” as she was in a manner of speaking the Mary Magdalene of our day.

NEXT WEEK: A FAMILY THAT DABBLED IN WITCHCRAFT

Continue Reading

Columns

Challenges in our lives

21st June 2022

Allah Almighty reminds us: ‘On no soul does Allah place a burden greater than it can bear’ (Qur’an 2:286). Also: “Be patient. Surely, Allah is with those who are the patient.” [Qur’an 8: 46].

Without fail, whether we like it or not there are times in our lives when many things seem to go wrong and as mere humans we go into a panic syndrome and are left wondering; why me? Why now? What have I done to deserve this? We are all tested with adversity, hard times and pain, but these tribulations are the Almighty’s way of transforming us and help us develop spiritually.

As mere humans we all have different reactions when something good or bad happens to us, and usually our reactions depend on the strength of our religious belief and of our righteous deeds and actions.

One person may receive blessings and goodness with gratitude and accepts the bad challenges and patches in his life with perseverance and endurance. This positive attitude brings him peace of mind and happiness, causing his grief, anxiety and misery to ease. Thus, this positivity brings a balance and contentment in his life.

On the other hand another person receives blessings and goodness with arrogance and transgression; his manners degenerate and become evil; he receives this goodness and utilizes it in an unthinking and uncaring manner; it does not give him any peace of mind as his mind is always distressed, nervous and restless.

Thus when faced with loss and difficulty, due to his arrogant nature, he begins to ask why me? What have I done to deserve this and he may even damn and curse others and thinks that they are plotting his downfall.

But every now and then we should stop to ponder over the blessings both apparent and hidden from The Almighty upon us, it is only then that we will realise that our Lord has granted us abundant blessings and protected us from a number of evils; this will certainly ease our grief and anxiety and bring about a measure of happiness and contentment.

Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said: “Look to those who are lower than you (those who possess less than you) and do not look to those higher than you; this will make you appreciate the bounties of Allah upon you.”

Whether we are believers or disbelievers, virtuous or sinful, most of us are to a certain degree able to adapt and condition ourselves to face adversity and remain calm during these moments of challenge, uncertainty and upheaval.

When people receive affliction with fear, discontent, sorrow and despair; their life becomes miserable, they panic and become short tempered. Such people are unable to exercise patience remain restless, stressed and cannot find contentment that could make life easier for them.

On the other hand, due to a believer’s strong faith and reliance on Allah, it makes him persevere and he emerges stronger than others in difficult situations as this reduces his fear and anxiety and that ultimately makes matters easier for him. If he is afflicted with sickness, poverty or any other affliction, he is tranquil and content and has no desire for anything which has not been decreed for him.

‘If Allah touches you with affliction, none can remove it but He; if He touches you with happiness, He has power over all things’ (Qur’an 6: 17).Therefore the believer prays to his Lord: ‘Our Lord, condemn us not if we forget or fall into error…lay not on us a burden greater than which we have the strength to bear’ (Qur’an 2:286)

However, the one who is weak in faith will be just the opposite; he becomes anxious, nervous, confused and full of fear. The anxiety and paranoia will team up against him because this person does not have the faith that could enable him to persevere during tough times, he is less likely to handle the pressures and will be left in a somewhat troubled and depressed state of mind.

It is natural that as humans we are always fearful of losing the things that we have acquired; we desire and cherish them and we are anxious to acquire more, because many of us will never reach a point where we are satisfied with the material things in life.

When certain frightening, disturbing or unsettling events occur, like emergencies or accidents we find that a person with sound faith is calm, steadfast, and able to cope with the situation and handle the hardship he is going through; such a person has conditioned himself to face afflictions and this makes his heart stronger and more steadfast, which gives him a level of tranquillity.

This shows the difference between a person who has strong belief and acts accordingly, and another who is not at this level of faith. Due to the strong belief of the true believer he is content with whatever Allah Almighty has decreed,

This life is full of ups and downs and uncertainties, but the only certain thing is that from the moment we are born we will be tested with life’s challenges throughout our entire lives, up to and to the final certainty, death. ‘Be sure We shall test you with something of fear and hunger, some loss in goods or lives, or the fruits of your toil, but give glad tidings to those who patiently persevere’ (Qur’an2:155).

The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said: “How wonderful is the matter of the believer! All of his matters are good and this is the case for nobody except a believer. If he is blessed with prosperity he thanks (Allah Almighty) and that is good for him; and if he is afflicted with adversity he is patient and perseveres and that is also good for him.”

During those challenging times you have three choices: either you can let them define you, let them destroy you; or you can let them strengthen you.

Continue Reading

Columns

Train Spotting

21st June 2022

Here in Botswana we are in the throes of winter chills, currently experiencing the tail-end of a deep freeze in South Africa which has brought snow to parts of the Karoo. Conversely, over in the United Kingdom, they are moving into summer and there is a mini heatwave happening, with temperatures in the thirties.

Both countries have one thing in common – they are heavily reliant on tourism revenues and both have accordingly suffered due to Covid which severely curtailed all movement and travel, most of all for leisure and pleasure. However, earlier this year the UK cast off the last of its Covid restrictions and travel requirements and basically declared the pandemic to be over. Britain was back in business!

So the very hard-hit hospitality sectors finally had some good news. The crowds would be returning, needing hotel and bed & breakfast accommodation, snacks and sit-down meals, pub lunches and all manner of ancillary services. Other related sectors also put out the metaphorical flags – theatres, cinemas, theme parks, camping & caravan sites, all of which had suffered hugely during the pandemic and all could now re-open their doors to paying punters.

If you’ve ever visited the UK you will know of its many attractions. London is not only a vibrant, multi-cultural city, it is also very historic, with centuries-old palaces and cathedrals and world-class galleries and museums. Outside the capital, there is glorious scenery, from rolling pastures in the south to the breath-taking Lake District and the Highlands and lovely lochs to the far north in Scotland plus all manner of coastal delights and cultural experiences.

For everyone even remotely involved in leisure, hospitality and entertainment, it was cash registers and swipe machines at the ready!

But then green for go suddenly and without warning changed to red for stop. It began with misery for air passengers. Only last week the UK Guardian reported ‘It has been another ” week of chaos at UK airports, with hundreds of flights cancelled and holidaymakers facing long queues, with reports of waits of up to eight hours. Pent-up demand for travel and staff shortages have combined to put pressure on airports and airlines.’

The Prospect union, which represents thousands of aviation staff, ” warned on Tuesday that “things could get worse this summer before they get better”, quoting staff shortages across the industry, with a huge reliance on overtime to get by day to day. The problem stemmed from the massive, industry-wide lay-offs over Covid and a sector seemingly taken by surprise by the lifting of travel restrictions. Airlines are now scrambling to replace staff made redundant, many of whom were forced to find employment in other sectors.

In addition some specialised staff such are aircrew had no option but to let their licences lapse and now find themselves technically not fit for flying duties. Ironically, one of the country’s largest and longest-established airline – British Airways – appears to be the one most severely affected with many of their former cabin crew members reporting that they had been laid off during the downturn with the promise of potential re-employment later but who are now being told their services are not required.

One BA pilot has warned of potential staff exodus and further delays that could last through to winter. When talking about ongoing staff shortages in the industry he predicted: “We might be correctly crewed by winter time. There is no chance this will be sorted this summer.

The last month (August) might be okay.” UK Transport Secretary Grant Shapps put the blame squarely on the industry for the widespread chaos, saying some airlines had cut too many staff during the pandemic. “The decisions as to whether or not to lay off in the end were airlines’ decisions. They clearly in the end, looking back, cut too far on that,” he told the BBC.

Lufthansa is also joining the party in announcing cancellations. The airline will be scrapping 900 flights from its schedule, from next month. Affected flights will predominantly be on Fridays and weekends to a number of European destinations, from Frankfurt and Munich.

The airline stated: “After …two years of the pandemic, Lufthansa group airlines report high demand for air travel this summer……At present, however, the infrastructure has not yet been fully restored. The entire aviation industry, especially in Europe, is currently suffering from bottlenecks and staff shortages. This affects airports, ground handling services, air traffic control, and also airlines.”

Of course some flights are taking place and some tourists are managing to make it into the UK on a much-needed holiday but for many of them sadly, the airport might be as far as they get because to add to the flight misery, members of two large transport union, the RMT and Unite, will bring the London Underground to a grinding halt next week with planned strike action.

Simultaneously, but in a separate dispute, other RMT members will also be staging a series of strikes on Network Rail and other mainline UK train operators. So should those tourists wish to proceed to some of the country’s top holiday destinations, they’d be well advised to seek an alternative means of transport.

Economists are already predicting this wave of strikes to cost the UK economy at least £91million, according to the Centre for Economics and Business Research, proving devastating for the night-time and hospitality industries in particular. Hospitality chiefs estimated the national rail strike alone will cost the sector £540million over the week amid a 20 per cent drop in sales, the combination of which will hit ‘fragile consumer confidence’ and could ‘deliver a fatal financial blow’ to some firms.

In response, Transport for London (TFL), presumably in all seriousness, said its teams from Santander Cycles will be ensuring hire bicycles are ‘distributed at key locations according to demand’ and told commuters that ‘walking or cycling may be quicker for some journeys’ during the strike action.

Sounds to me like the message is ‘On yer bike’!

Continue Reading
Weekend Post