Abraham ousts southern Pharaoh to become undisputed King of Egypt
Having become Pharaoh Mehibre Kheti of northern Egypt toward the end of 2047 BC, Abraham soon decided to take a second wife. This was fundamentally for political reasons: as a de facto Egyptian now, it was needful that he marry an indigenous woman to help raise his esteem in the eyes of the disaffected indigenous Egyptians. Her name was Hagar.
As we pointed out last week, Hagar was not Sarah’s slave: that simply is a slur tagged on her by the Jewish authors of Genesis with a view to undermine her pedigree. She was a daughter of the Egyptian nobility. Since the dominant peoples of Egypt populationwise those days were blacks, the odds are Hagar was black too. It could explain why the pale-skinned Genesis authors contrived such a demeaning outlook of her.
Yet to Abraham and his people anywhere, Hagar was just as reverenced as Sarah. Hagar was not her original name: it was given to her when she married Abraham. She was named after a prominent river in the Indian subcontinent –the Hakar. The Hakar River was a tributary of the Saraisvasti River and if you recall, the Saraisvasti was named after Sarah to honour her as Terah/Krishna’s seniormost daughter. India had a special place in Abraham’s heart in that Terah was born there and the Hykso-Hebrews, who now abounded in northern Egypt and who had facilitated Abraham’s smooth landing there, originally came from India.
Exactly in what year Abraham and Hagar tied the knot is nor certain but it was somewhere between 2047 and 2040 BC. It was during this same period that Abraham had his first biological son. This was Ishmael, born to Hagar. If we are to go by the Genesis account, Hagar stole a march on Sarah reproductively because Sarah was barren. That, of course, is a sublime pack of lies. In the days of the Anunnaki, no royal woman could be infertile, let alone sterile. The Anunnaki were genetic wizards.
If Sarah was unable to conceive, all she needed to do was to call upon Ningishzidda, Ninmah, or Enki – all of whom were genetic fundis and nine months later she would be cradling a little bundle of joy. For God’s sake, Zidda for one was capable of cloning beings from even non-sexual cells (a process known as artificial meiosis), which he did with Horus, the posthumous son of the iconic Egyptian Anunnaki god Osiris.
What most likely happened was that Sarah initially had girls only and as a result, Hagar beat her to it when her first child turned out to be a son. That could explain why Sarah had such a virulent loathing of Hagar: she feared that Ishmael would inherit after Abraham in the event that she was unable to produce a boy, leaving her progeny in the lurch. I enjoin you not to take everything you read in the Bible as incontrovertible truth: the “Holy Writ” is not without its share of concoctions, distortions, and outright disinformation. Luckily, Sarah was not destined to be sonless. Not every long after Hagar had Ishmael, Sarah begot Isaac. But was Isaac Abraham’s biological child? You will be surprised to hear this, but he wasn’t!
SARAH IS WIFE TO TWO PHARAOHS
At long last, Abraham received a letter of acknowledgement from Pharaoh Mentuhotep I that his prospective emissary was welcome and was being awaited in Thebes, the capital of southern Egypt. Abraham was ecstatic: instead of sending down his chief aide, he decided to travel himself. That he would do incognito. He would pose as his own high priest rather than travel on his own behalf as Pharaoh Mehibre Kheti. The reasons he did this were two-fold.
First, if he went as a Pharaoh, Mentuhotep was unlikely to welcome him as he regarded him as a usurper. He might even be held for ransom by the highly disgruntled southern pharaoh. Second, he wanted to deploy his queen Sarah as a Trojan Horse with which to endear himself to Mentuhotep and strike at the most opportune moment. Abraham’s camouflage would not be easy to see through as Mentuhotep I had never met him in person. Very few people were as cunning as General Abe.
When Abraham arrived at the royal palace in Thebes, he was very well-received by Pharaoh Mentuhotep. And in keeping with his stratagem, he did not introduce himself as Pharaoh Mehibire Kheti: he introduced himself as the pharaoh’s high priest primarily and his chief steward secondarily. Moreover, he did not introduce Sarah as his wife: he introduced her simply as his half-sister.
Now, Sarah was stunningly beautiful. In 2046 BC, she was 67 years old, having been born in 2113 BC. By human standards, she was old, but since like Abraham she had a lot of Anunnaki blood in her, she did not age as fast as ordinary Earthlings did: she in all probability looked between 35 and 45 years at the time. Inevitably therefore, Mentuhotep was smitten. But there was an even weightier reason as to why Mentuhotep began to hit on Sarah.
Sarah, it transpired, was related to him. She was actually a maternal full sister of Mentuhotep. Remember, Sarah’s mother Tohwait was married to Intef the Elder, the deceased ex-governor of Thebes before she got married to Terah. Whilst married to Intef, she had a son with him and this was none other than Mentuhotep I. Sarah and Mentuhotep were therefore maternal siblings.
As Abraham was busy spying on Thebes under the pretext that he was trying to familiarise with the gods of southern Egypt as a high priest of the northern Pharaoh and promoting Nannar-Sin at the expense of Amun-Ra, as Marduk was known in Egypt, Sarah, who remained at the palace, was being gallantly propositioned by Menthuhotep. There was nothing incestuous about this as Egyptian royals of old did marry their sisters, whether half-sister or full sister.
If you recall, the diabolical Egyptian Anunnaki god Seth was married to his full-sister Nephthys. It was this same setup Mentuhotep wished vis-à-vis his full sister Sarah and before long the two had tied the knot. Sarah found herself married to two pharaohs though of course Mentuhotep was not aware she was Abraham’s wife. On his part, Abraham didn’t care an iota about this development as it perfectly conformed with his scheme to unseat Mentuhotep and appropriate the whole of Egypt.
ABRAHAM DEPOSES MENTUHOTEP TO RULE WHOLE OF EGYPT
It did not take long before Sarah had a child with Mentuhotep, a son. This was the famous Isaac. This may take the Christian fraternity by surprise as the Bible seems to suggest that Isaac was Abraham’s biological son. Well, that was yet another spin the Genesis writers put on the affair. At the same time, the Genesis writers did drop sufficient hints that Isaac was not a true-blue Jew but a foreigner.
First, there is the case where Abraham decided to sacrifice Isaac to his god Enlil (GENESIS 22:1-19). If Isaac was the true heir of Abraham, he wouldn’t have been Abraham’s choice for a sacrificial killing: he’d have chosen Ishmael. The fact that he opted for Isaac demonstrates quite clearly that he had a very low regard for Isaac, who indeed wasn’t his real son.
Second, there’s the curious case of Esau, Isaac’s firstborn son, selling his birthright to his younger brother Jacob (GENESIS 25:29-34). The reason advanced by the Genesis writers is that Esau did so out of famishment with hunger when Jacob offered him a tantalising morsel of mouthwatering stewed meat subject to forfeiting his right of primogeniture. Of course the story is nonsensical. No one would sell a birthright on account of pangs of hunger.
In any case, Esau and family were not ordinary, struggling people as the Genesis writers would have you believe: they were royals, a dynastic family of substantial means. And hunger amongst the royals is unheard of anywhere. What Genesis doesn’t tell you is that Jacob wrested the birthright from Esau simply because Esau had an Egyptian mother whereas Jacob had a Hebrew mother: the two were not twins at all but half siblings. The twin phenomenon was a pure concoction.
Indeed even the Bible itself tells us Esau’s descendents are Edomites, who racially are Arabs. Herod the Great was an Edomite, which was one reason the Jews loathed him like the plague. Like all biblical patriarchs, Isaac had several wives – comprising of Egyptians and Hebrews – and Jacob succeeded after Isaac because he had more Hykso/Hebrew blood than Esau, who carried a substantial portion of indigenous Egyptian blood being the son of the half-white, half-black Isaac: it was as simple as that.
Meanwhile, as Mentuhotep’s concubine wife, Sarah was highly doted upon. She took advantage of the fervid affection she enjoyed to tactfully inquire about the strategic secrets of Thebes from her husband and these she passed on to Abraham. Then when Abraham had gathered sufficient intelligence, he told Sarah to confess to Mentuhotep as to her true relationship with him. Upon learning that Abraham was at once Sarah’s husband and half-brother, Mentuhotep was irate. But he was not prepared to let go of the voluptuous Sarah: instead, he compensated Abraham with “flocks, and herds, and silver, and gold, and menservants, and maidservants, and camels, and asses,” without the merest idea though that Abraham was actually Pharaoh Mehibre of northern Egypt.
At the time, however, General Abraham was already in his stride. The mighty Hykso army had already stolen into Thebes and before long Mentuhotep was overthrown. Pharaoh Mehibre Kheti of northern Egypt was now Pharaoh of the entire land of Egypt. Abraham no doubt was a brilliant military tactician.
ENKI, MARDUK MAINSTREAMS ORMUS IN CANAAN!
Meanwhile, in Sumer-Akkad (the East) and Canaan (the West), Nabu was making significant political and territorial gains. Arguably the greatest demagogue of his day, Nabu had managed to win over the loyalty of five Canaanite kings who ruled what were known as the “Cities of the Plain”, that is, the River Jordan plain. They were Bera King of Sodom; Birsha King of Gomorrah; Shinab King of Admah; Shemeber King of Zebim; and Zoar King of Belah.
However, the five kings were not sovereign: they were subject kings who were under the rule of an overarching, Sumer-based King known as Khedorlaomer, the king of the militarily efficient Elamites. It was Nabu who persuaded the five kings to rise against Khedorlaomer after promising them full sovereign status when his father Marduk was the God of the Age of Aries. With five powerful Canaanite kings in his sphere of influence, Nabu now poised to capture the spaceport. With the spaceport in the bag, it would be curtains for the Enlilites as it was the ultimate symbol of Earthly authority.
With Abraham, Enlil’s trump card, ensconced as King of Egypt, it fell to Amar-Sin, the King of Sumer-Akkad, to step into the breach. Accordingly, Enlil ordered Amar-Sin to launch a major military campaign against the “sinning cities” or “rebel lands” as he called the five cities of the Jordan plain. What heinous sin had they committed in the eyes of Enlil?
According to DEUTERONOMY 29:22-27, “they had forsaken the covenant of the Lord (Enlil) … and they went and served other gods (Enkites).” But other sources furnish hints for a more crucial reason – Enki and Marduk had had begun to mainstream the consumption of Ormus, or gold dust, in Canaan to ready its people for the dawning astrological Age of Aries. This Ormus, which was obtained from the Dead Sea, the Canaanites now guarded jealously from expropriation by the Brotherhood of Gold – the Enlilites, who didn’t wish mankind to partake of it and therefore prolong their lives indefinitely and gain staggering metaphysical insights.
In a text known as the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 109 A reads as follows: “As for the Earth, out of it cometh bread; and under it it is burned up as it were with fire. And it has dust of gold … They said (the Canaanites): since there cometh forth bread out of Earth, and it has the dust of gold, why should we suffer wayfarers, who come to us only to deplete our wealth?. Come, let us abolish the practice of travelling in our land.”
The Canaanites, who had fanatically rallied behind Marduk and Nabu, now regarded the Enlilites as “wayfarers”, or encroachers whose principal goal was to deprive them of access to and the utilisation of Ormus. They therefore decided to bar Enlilites and their Sumerian human minions from setting foot on Canaanite soil. That meant fighting them to the death. The term “bread”, as we have long explained at length, referred to shewbread, which was the directly edible bread-loaf form of Ormus.
In a Sumerian text titled Enki and World Order by the great Sumerologist Samuel N Kramer, we learn something very similar about “bread”. The text partly reads, “Enki placed the nourishing bread, the bread of all, in charge of the black-heads”. “Blackheads” was the Anunnaki term for mankind and the nourishing bread of all was a metaphor for Ormus.
INANNA HIJACKS CANAANITE SIEGE
Since Amar-Sin was aware he was faced with a very formidable enemy, he decided to form a coalition to reinforce his forces. He allied with their ancillary kings of the principal Sumerian city-states. They were Eri-Akhu of Larsa; Khedorlaomer of Elam; and Tidal of Goim, with Khedorlaomer as the military commander. The ensuing confrontation became known as “The War of the Kings”. It pitted “Four Kings of the East” (The Khedorlaomer Alliance) against “Five Kings of the West” (The Canaanite Coalition), and took place in 2041 BC. The war was of such eminence that the GENESIS Chapter 14 is wholly dedicated to it.
Amar-Sin’s brief was to “reassert Enlilite control over Tilmun (the spaceport), to sever the sacred region from the ‘rebel lands’, then pry loose those lands from the influence of Nabu and Marduk by force of arms”. Enlil’s get-set instructions to Amar-Sin were to sieze and defile Babylon, Marduk’s cult centre. Says the Khedorlaomer Text: “The gods … to Khedorlaomer, king of the land Elam, they decreed: ‘Descend there!’ That which to the city was bad he (Marduk) performed: Babylon, the precious city of Marduk, sovereignty Khedorlaomer seized. In Babylon, the city of the king of the gods, Marduk, kingship Khedorlaomer overthrew. o To herds of dogs its temple Khedorlaomer made a den; flying ravens, loud shrieking, their dung dropped there.”
Next was Borsippa. “The stronghold of Nabu, with weapons be despoiled”, Enlil said to Amar-Sin. It was from Borsippa, south of Babylon, that Nabu had orchestrated the insurrection of the five Canaanite cities against Khedorlaomer and rallied Sumer-Akkad cities west of the Euphrates. Marching under the banner of Nannar-Sin and in heed of the strategic guidance of the irrepressible Inanna-Ishtar, Khedorlaomer “with wicked thoughts against Marduk, the shrine of Borsippa with fire he destroyed and its sons with a sword he slew” before he and his three allies proceeded to smite one Western land after another.
Enlil’s emphasis to Amar-Sin was that under no circumstances should the spaceport fall into the hands of Nabu and Marduk for if that happened heads would surely roll. The principal role of the Khedorlaomer Alliance was to protect the spaceport. Hearing this, the ultra-ambitious Inanna decided to capitalise as the overall military strategist of the Western Kings.
She sweet-talked the frontline commanders into not safeguarding the spaceport as such but seizing it on her behalf so that she uses it as leverage to ascend to the lordship of Earth at the expense of the deserving Marduk and to hell with her father Nannar-Sin and her grandfather Enlil. Having been promised their own tiny fiefdoms in the new dispensation, the frontline commanders undertook to do likewise. Thus the campaign turned full cycle: it was no longer under the auspices of Nannar-Sin: it was under the auspices of Inanna-Ishtar.
KHEDORLAOMAR FORCE THRUST INTO CANAAN
Exactly how did the Khedorlaomar Alliance advance? Zechariah Sitchin: “Acting in accordance with an oracle of Ishtar, the army put together by the Kings of the East arrived in Transjordan using the southern route from Mesopotamia to Canaan. The invaders proceeded southward in Transjordan, along the King's Highway, attacking in succession key outposts guarding crossing points on the Jordan River.
“First to be attacked was a stronghold in ‘the high land’, then Rabattum. The route was the same as the one described in the Bible: from the highland in the north through the district of Rabattum in the center, southward around the Dead Sea. Thereafter, El-Paran (the city just before the spaceport) was to be captured, and the Canaanite cities (including Gaza and Beer-Sheba in the Negev) were to be punished.
“According to the biblical tale, a place called El-Paran was the real target of the invaders, but it was never reached by them. Coming down Transjordan and circling the Dead Sea, the invaders passed by Mount Se'ir and advanced ‘toward El-Paran, which is upon the Wilderness."
But as they approached El-Paran, the invaders were intercepted by a formidable stumbling block in the form of one referred to in the Khedorlaomar Text as “the Son of the Priest, whom the gods in their own true council had anointed.” This dude, Enlil’s chosen Shepherd-King of the Age of Aries, was indeed the son of Melchizedek, the Priest-King of Jerusalem. He was General Abraham. NEXT WEEK: ABRAHAM CONFRONTS THE INVADERS
Princess Mary falls pregnant only one month after her betrothal to Prince Joseph
To put the lineage of Mary the mother of Jesus in context, General Atiku, it is in order that we begin with her grandfather Yehoshua (Jesus in Greek) III.
Mary was offspring of two royal lines, the Davidic line and the Hasmonean line. Yehoshua III was the Herod–appointed High Priest of Israel between 36 and 23 BC. He had no sons, only three daughters namely Joanna, Elizabeth, and Anna, all of whom he organised dynastic suitors.
Elizabeth would be married off into the House of Aaron, the legitimate priestly line, and Joanna and Anna would be married off into the House of David, the legitimate kingly line. That’s how Elizabeth became the wife of Zechariah of the tribe of Levi and in due course the mother of John the Baptist.
Mainstream Israel up to the level of the Sanhedrin had recognised Anna as the eligible mother of the future King of Israel and not the sitting impostor Herod (it is not clear what happened to first-born Joanna but she probably passed away before she got married). Anna was accordingly married off to Alexander III, a Davidic and Hasmonean prince who was best known as Heli as indeed the genealogy of Luke clearly attests.
Heli and Anna too had no sons. They only had daughters, the firstborn of whom was Dorcas, whose was born in 26 BC and whose titular name was Mary. Mary was orphaned early in her childhood when her father Heli was killed in 17 BC at the orders of the increasingly paranoid Herod and when her mother Anna died a year or so later.
Since she was a dynastic heiress, it was likely that Herod would come after her. The Essenes thus secreted her somewhere in remote Galilee. It was actually in Galilee that most members of the Davidic royal line were concentrated not only to keep as far away from Herod as possible but to also enjoy the protective custody of the Zealots, who were the secret military wing of the Essenes and a thorn in the side of both Herod and the Romans. Joseph was also officially based in Galilee although both he and Mary were in truth based at Qumran in the Judean wilds.
JOSEPH CALLED TO “DUTY”
Dynastic marriages are often more politically strategic than spontaneous, General. For example, the union of Prince Charles and Princess Diana was motivated by the need to fuse the Windsor genes with those of the Stuarts as the Windsors, being predominantly Reptilians, were finding it increasingly difficult to maintain their human form.
The Stuarts, the clan of Diana, had by far more human genes than Reptilian and they too were an aristocratic family. That’s why once Charles had produced a “heir and a spare”, he completely sidelined Diana, who he had never loved, and devoted himself to his real love – Camilla Parker-Bowles.
The marriage of Joseph to Mary, General, was equally strategic. Although both were from the tribe of Judah and of the royal Davidic line, they were from different branches. Joseph was a descendant of Solomon, whereas Mary was a descendant of Nathan, Solomon’s elder brother. The line of Solomon, as we once underlined, had been tainted by the Jeconiah curse.
The line of Nathan was clean. Since the son of Joseph and Mary would be the future King of Israel, it was important that he not be compromised by the baggage, rightly or wrongly, of the Jeconiah curse. Hence the desirability of the union of Prince Joseph and Princess Mary.
Now, both Joseph and Mary’s clans were Essenes. As such, their marriage process, formalities, and protocols had to strictly adhere to Essene dynastic rules. The Essenes were in ranks. Amongst the higher echelons were the two great dynasties, the Davids and the Zadoks, who had been the high priests and kings of Israel respectively before the destruction of the Temple by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC.
The Davids and Zadoks lived a strictly holy life, typically in a monastery at Qumran, the reclusive headquarters of the Essenes. They were sequestered there so that they did not fall prey to the machinations of the bloodthirsty King Herod though officially their address was Galilee. In fact, the major reason the Essene movement had come into existence was to preserve and safeguard the Davidic and Zadokite lines, the religio-politico haunt of Herod and the Hasmoneans initially.
According to the Essene code, General, the Zadoks and the Davids were not to engage in sex for recreational purposes because it was regarded as defiling: it diluted holiness. The only times they were supposed to do so was when need arose to produce heirs. In 8 BC, it was now opportune for Joseph, the David, to produce a heir and so he was excused from a life of chastity.
At this point in time in fact, the Essenes were focused on two dynastic figures. These were Joseph and Zechariah. The two were expected to produce the Messiah of David and the Messiah of Aaron, that is, the future King of Israel and the future High Priest of Israel.
According to Essene rules, the David had to marry at age 36, so that by the time he was 40, he had already sired a heir. The new heir had to be born when the David was 37. If the child was a daughter, she could not inherit, and so the David had to set about the procreation of a second-born, who hopefully would be a boy (copulation to that end was allowed only when the daughter was 3 years old).
The Davidic heir had to be born not in any other month but in September, the holiest in the Jewish calendar. In order to conform to these parameters, a betrothal ceremony was held at the beginning of June. During the betrothal period – the three months from beginning of June to end of August – sexual relations were not permitted.
Then at the beginning of September, a First Marriage was held. This was the beginning of the marriage proper as now the couple were allowed to become intimate. However, the intimacy began only in December, with a view to delivering a heir in September the following year. At the end of March, the Second Marriage was held for it was hoped that by that time the spouse was three months pregnant if there hadn’t been a miscarriage. With the Second Marriage, the wedlock was permanent: divorce was never allowed whatsoever.
Meanwhile, General, if the spouse hadn’t conceived in December, sexual relations were suspended till December the following year. The husband would then leave her spouse and return either to the monastery at Qumran or embark on a tour of duty elsewhere in furtherance of the Essene cause.
A BINDING ENGAGEMENT
According to the Dead Sea Scrolls, General, the Essenes were not only a spiritual, revolutionary, and philosophical movement. They were also ardent believers in astrology. They meticulously studied the stars and the movements of planets to read what they portended about the future.
Thus the reason a Davidic heir had to be born in September was not only because this was the holiest month of the year: it was also in recognition of the fact that September was ruled by the constellation Virgo. In other words, September was astrologically the month of the virgin. That was what Mary was.
Mary was both a virgin physically and a virgin titularly. A bride of the future king was required to be a virgin. As an Essene, Mary belonged to the Order (not the tribe) of Dan. This was the Order of Nuns, or virgins, both legal and physical virgins. Thus in the Order of Dan, a woman was not a virgin only before she slept with a man: she was a virgin until she was six months pregnant. In the case of a dynastic spouse like Mary, this was up to end of June. From then henceforth, she was promoted within the Order to the first stage of a Mother.
Joseph’s betrothal to Mary took place at Qumran in June 8 BC. Now, in our day, betrothal simply means engagement to be married. In ancient Israel up to New Testament times, betrothal was part and parcel of the marriage contract. It was definite and binding upon both groom and bride, who were considered as man and wife in all legal and religious aspects, except that sexual relations were not permitted.
For example, in 2 SAMUEL 3:14, King David refers to his betrothed woman as “my wife”. Also in DEUTERONOMY 22:24, a betrothed woman is referred to as “his neighbour’s wife”. In the betrothal formalities, dowry and bride price were included. If a bride and groom for one reason or the other wanted to opt out of the betrothal after the betrothal ceremony, they had to seek a formal divorce.
Since the betrothal took place in June, General, Joseph and Mary were not supposed to make love till December, that is, six months after the betrothal ceremony and three months after the First Marriage ceremony in September. Just one month after the betrothal ceremony (that is, at the beginning of July 8 BC), however, Mary became pregnant. Was it Joseph, General? Was it rape by a Roman soldier called Panthera as some contemporary records suggest? Or was it simply the supernatural act of the “Holy Spirit” as Christendom holds?
THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS
Those who hold that the circumstances of Mary’s pregnancy were supernatural, General, can be excused. This is because the language employed therein smacks of ethereality – Holy Spirit, Angel Gabriel, Son of the Most High, etc. To those who have read and rigorously studied the Dead Sea Scrolls, however, such terminology is well within the temporal context.
That is to say, it does not carry spiritual connotations as such. True, the idea of an angel speaking to Joseph and Mary in their sleep may seem supernatural but the dreams are theological interpolations, inserted into the gospels in onward editing to fit a contrived agenda – what Karl Marx called the opium of the masses.
The Dead Sea Scrolls are so named because they were discovered in caves around the Qumran plateau of the West Bank (about 40 km east of Jerusalem), at the northwest corner of the Dead Sea, in March 1947. The discoverer was a Bedouin shepherd kid who was looking for a lost goat. The scrolls were found hidden in jars.
The 1947 find was the initial discovery: more discoveries were made after further excavations on the same site spanning 11 years in a series of 11 caves. Altogether, 972 texts were turned up. They are written in four languages, namely Hebrew (the majority), Aramaic, Greek, and Nabatean, mostly on parchment. Other texts were inscribed on papyrus and bronze.
Most of the Dead Sea Scrolls are fragments. Fragments of all the Old Testament books have been found save for the book of Esther. The only complete book is Isaiah. There are also apocryphal books (those arbitrarily excluded from the Old Testament canon by the Constantine-convened Nicene Council of AD 325) such as the Book of Enoch and the Book of Jubilees, and sect-specific writings that embody rules and beliefs of the people who compiled them.
The latter include commentaries on the Old Testament, paraphrases that expand on the Law of Moses, rule books of the community, war conduct, thanksgiving psalms, hymnic compositions, benedictions, liturgical texts, and sapiential (wisdom) writing. These texts have been given appropriate titles such as the War Scroll; Manual of Discipline; the Community Rule; the Temple Scroll; the Copper Scroll; etc.
The Dead Sea Scrolls were written/preserved by the Essenes between 168 BC and 68 AD. We know this because Pliny, the first century Roman historian, wrote that, “On the west coast of Lake Asphaltitis (the Dead Sea) are settled the Essenes, at some distance from the noisome odours that are experienced on the shore itself.
They are a lonely people, the most extraordinary in the world, who live without women, without love, without money, with the palm trees for their only companions.” The Essenes stashed away the scrolls sometime in 70 AD, when Roman General Flavius Titus overran Jerusalem and laid waste to the Temple following a catastrophic Jewish uprising – led by the Zealots, the military wing of the Essenes – that began in 66 BC.
This they did in heed of JEREMIAH 32:14, which says, “Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Take these evidences … and put them in an earthen vessel, that they may continue many days.” The Dead Sea Scrolls have given us invaluable insight into the beliefs, customs, rituals, politics, philosophies, and traditions of first century Palestine.
The rivalry between luxury German automotive marques Mercedes-Benz and BMW is legendary. Both brands offer high-end, high-priced desirable models, always at the forefront of cutting-edge driving technology and excellence. And in the annals of the advertising world, a campaign between the two rivals is equally legendary and it happened on our own doorstep.
Many of you will be familiar with the coastal road out of Cape Town called Chapman’s Peak. It is a beautiful, sightseeing attraction, the road winding through spectacular coastal-mountain scenery, with cliffs sinking into the Atlantic ocean on one side, and steep mountains towering over the road on the other. However, the road is also notoriously dangerous, with its 114 sharp, meandering bends . It’s reputation is well-deserved . Several years ago, when a major coastal cleanup campaign was launched, a helicopter pulled a total of 22 wrecked cars out of the water adjacent to Chapman’s Peak and it was one such accident which prefaced the notorious marketing battle. The story is thus:
In 1988 an Irish businessman lost control of his Mercedes Benz when driving along this road, plunging 100 metres down the cliff. Miraculously, he not only survived the accident, but crawled out of the wreckage with hardly a scratch on his body.
When Mercedes heard the details, the marketing department decided to base a new advertisement on the story to promote the safety features and stability of the brand. In the video ad they intentionally drove an identical model off the road in the exact same location, having it plunge off the edge of the cliff, the driver stepping out similarly unscathed, proving the phenomenal survivability and strength of Mercedes Benz.
When the marketing suits at BMW saw this ad, they took a bold and ingenious decision to mimic it but with a twist. Only a week later, whilst the first ad was still fresh in the public’s minds, they shot their ad showing a BMW driving along the exact same stretch of road in the rain. However, when it reached the point at which the Mercedes plunged off the cliff, the BMW negotiated it safely, and continued driving along the road.
The catchphrase of the ad was “BMW beats the bends” . Or was it? It was cunningly recorded so that it could equally have been ‘beats the Benz’, implying that their cars had superior cornering and stability to their rival, Even more sneakily, they launched their campaign on a Saturday, mindful of the rules on competitive advertising in South Africa, safe in the knowledge that no objectionable actions could be taken till the new working week.
Mercedes-Benz wasted no time on Monday in issuing an injunction, the ad was swiftly pulled but the damage was done and the dog had had its day. The ad campaign ranks high in the history of advertising and can still be found online to this day. Meanwhile the rivalry between the two automotive greats goes on.
I reference this piece of marketing history in the light of this week’s horror crash by golfing great, Tiger Woods. Driving from a luxury holiday resort in California to a nearby country club Tiger Woods lost control of his vehicle on a downhill stretch of the road, smashed through a road sign, crossed over the central reservation and rolled his car several hundred feet. He had to be cut out and pulled to safety through the windscreen and the vehicle was so badly damaged, the attending police officers said he was ‘lucky to survive’.
The vehicle Woods was driving was a rented Genesis GV80 SUV. If you are unfamiliar with the brand that is not surprising since it is a relatively new spin-off from the South Korean Hyundai marque. The Genesis utility vehicle, not available locally yet, retails for around $50,000 or half a million pula, placing it in the higher end of town and country SUVs in the USA.
The model has certainly been widely publicised in the media coverage of the high-profile sportsman’s accident and I suspect that if asked to comment, Hyundai/Genesis would disagree with the police assessment, putting Woods’ survival down to build quality and in-built safety features such as crumple zones, anti-roll bars and airbags, which were deployed in the crash and would most certainly have played their part cushioning the effects of the rolling and ultimate impact. There is , of course, no suggestion that the manufacturers will capitalise on Woods’ survival but certainly it will have done the brand no harm that he did indeed emerge with recoverable injuries.
Comparing the two accidents, the driver of the Mercedes driving along Chapman’s Peak was, of course, an ordinary member of the public whilst Tiger Woods is a household name. That said, in humanitarian terms each tale of survival carries equal weight but the fact remains that the former was just another local story of yet one more victim of a notoriously tricky stretch of road whilst the latter went round the world in an instant because of the fame and name of the driver.
There is also no evidence that that stretch of Californian urban highway carried any inherent risk. His appears to have been just a loss of control and a freak accident. However, in the event that Hyundai/Genesis should consider making capital from that accident, a note of caution needs to be sounded.
In the advertising world, the use of celebrities to promote a product is a fall-back stance to sell anything from washing-up liquid to whisky but statistics have shown that it can be a double-edged sword in that yes, the ads are memorable and the public love them when the celeb is popular and personable. But…..what is often remembered is the name of the famous promoter, not the name of the product. In other words, they sell themselves far better than they sell the item.
In golfing terminology Hyundai/Genesis are not ‘out of the Woods’ yet and maybe they should go with a completely different Driver!
How Jesus’s grandfather sold his birthright to megalomaniac Herod
If you were to ask a Christian to name the main Jewish sects, General Atiku, he would no doubt begin with the Pharisees (because Jesus had innumerable slanging matches with them according to the gospels), followed by the Sadducees. Yet there was a third, equally momentous sect – the Essenes.
Although there’s not a single, one mention of the Essenes in the Bible, General, the New Testament is filled with Essene-type language as anybody who has read the Dead Sea Scrolls would readily recognise.
In point of fact, it was the Essenes who produced Jesus as well as the infamous Jewish band of freedom fighters known as the Zealots. Furthermore, almost all the New Testament writers were either Essenes or champions of the Essene cause as is apparent in their language and the drift of their overall philosophy. The Essenes have a palpable presence in the Bible, albeit a cloaked one.
The Essenes, General, were the most popular, the most esteemed, and the most influential of the Jewish sects. The Jewish historian Philo (20 BC-50 AD) devotes 90 percent of his description of the Jewish sects to the Essenes. He wrote that the Essenes “dwell in many cities of Judea and in many villages and in great societies of many numbers”.
Hyppolytus of Rome (170-236 AD) devoted nine-and-half chapters to the Essenes and only one to the Sadducees. The Essenes are the authors of the famous Dead Sea Scrolls, which were discovered in 1947 in Israel at a place called Qumran and which have given us even greater insight into the happenings in the first century than the Bible itself.
How did the Essene movement come about, General? The Essenes, meaning “puritans of the faith”, were the Jewish sect that was the most loyal to the Davidic dynasty. They set themselves apart from the mainstream Jewish community circa 175 BC and established their headquarters at Qumran, about 40 km from Jerusalem.
Since the Jewish nation revered the Davidic royal line, the only legitimate and rightful rulers of Judah in their view, they rallied to the Essenes en masse. And because the Essenes were disparaging of the Hasmonean rule (140 BC to 63 BC), the mainstream Jews also took a dismissive view of Hasmonean rule too.
The Essenes were so highly regarded because of their virtue and spirituality. The legendary Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (37-100 AD) writes thus of them: “They are more mutually affectionate than the others (Pharisees and Sadducees). Whereas these men shun the pleasures as vice, they consider self-control and not succumbing to the passions virtue … Since [they are] despisers of wealth – their communal stock is astonishing – one cannot find a person among them who has more in terms of possessions.
For by a law, those coming into the school (that is, the Essene fold) must yield up their funds to the order, with the result that in all [their ranks] neither the humiliation of poverty nor the superiority of wealth is detectable, but the assets of each one have been mixed in together, as if they were brothers, to create one fund for all.”
In time, the Essenes, General, became quite influential even with occupying powers. For instance, when the Greek General Pompey installed Hyrcanus II as ruler of Palestine in 63 BC, he sought the opinion of the Essenes. The Essenes recommended that Hyrcanus go by the titles High Priest and Prince, not King, to which Pompey paid heed. In 142 BC, when Simon was installed by the Seleucids as ruler of Palestine, the Essenes had insisted on the same titular style. To the Essenes, everybody who occupied Israel’s seat of authority was simply holding fort for the real deal – the Davidic King.
In 37 BC, when Herod became King of Palestine, the potential Davidic King was Jacob-Eliakim – the father of the Joseph of the gospels – who was an Essene himself. It was in order to win the blessings of the historically popular Jewish royal family that Herod sought to curry favour with the Essenes.
JACOB’S PACT WITH HEROD
About the time Herod came to power, General, there were three citizens of considerable stature in Palestine – Hillel, Menahem, and Jacob-Eliakim, the grandfather of Jesus. Hillel is by all accounts ancient Israel’s greatest teacher and scholar.
He was the foremost spiritual sage in the development of the Talmud and the Mishnah, the most authoritative religious references of the Jews which are second only to the Old Testament in esteem. The renowned “Golden Rule”, which is invariably attributed to Jesus, was actually coined by Hillel. It is not certain whether Hillel was an Essene but his teachings did have a profound influence both on Essene philosophy and that of Jesus, who was an Essene too.
It was Menahem, however, who was an incontrovertible Essene. The Essenes were of two main branches, General. First, there were the puritans, the Palestinian Essenes. Then there were the liberals, the Diaspora Essenes, who sneered at the Palestinian Essenes’ dogmatism and rather strict views on morality. Menahem was the leader of the Diaspora Essenes.
He was also privilleged to be advisor to King Herod. Herod did hold Menahem in very high regard. Josephus relates that when Herod was a school-going lad, Menahem had patted him on his back and said to him, “one day you will be King young man.” Since the prophecy came to pass, Herod had a certain, atypical respect both for Menahem and the order of Essenes.
Jacob-Eliakim’s significance was by virtue of his pedigree. He was of the royal line of David and was therefore the uncrowned King of the Jews. Now, as we have already indicated, Herod had his own grand designs about rulership of the world notwithstanding the fact that he was in reality a vassal of Rome.
When he made overtures to the trio, they didn’t mince words: they told him that in the new Israel, the Israel that would rule Earth once the Romans had been toppled from the pedestal of world power, it was a Davidic King who would reign. Herod took very strong exception to such a prospect. Herod was neither a full-blooded Jew nor of Davidic stock but he was royalty in his own right.
His father, Antipater, had been the governor of Idumea and in due course Judea in the Hasmonean government and was in fact the real ruler of the entire Palestine, with John Hyrcanus being a mere figurehead king. When he (Herod) was only 25 years old, his father had appointed him governor of Galilee. Herod thus had strutted the corridors of power from the day he was born and he wasn’t going to give that up easily either for his own sake or that of his descendants.
As such, General, Herod maintained to the trio that in the new, overarching Kingdom of Israel, he was going to be the emperor and would be based in Jerusalem. Just like the Greek empire of Alexander had been a triarchy (a kingdom divided into three governments), the global Kingdom of Israel (“Thy Kingdom Come” in the Lord’s Prayer) was going to be likewise.
There was going to be a ruler in the east, a ruler in the west, and a ruler in the centre, that is Jerusalem, under the oversight of Herod himself. Hillel would rule in Jerusalem; Menahem in the east; and Jacob-Eliakim in the west. If these three happened to have disappeared from the Earthly scene by the time the Kingdom of Israel came into being, their descendants would observe the same setup.
The pecking order would thus be like this: Herod as the emperor; Hillel as the senior king; Menahem as the second-ranked king; and Jacob-Eliakim as the junior king. Put differently, Herod had by the stroke of a pen reduced the Davidic dynasty from foremost to least important as it posed the most serious threat to his office. Meanwhile, the three kings-in-waiting would go by the names of the Old Testament patriarchs.
Hillel would henceforth be called the Abraham, or the Father (or Papa, which later morphed into Pope), since Abraham was the Father of the Jewish nation; Menahem would be called the Isaac (Abraham’s son); and Eliakim the Jacob (Isaac’s son). Half a loaf was better than nothing at all and so Jacob-Eliakim meekly accepted this arrangement.
When Jesus later said, “Many will come from east and west and sit at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the new Kingdom of Heaven (MATTHEW 8:11),” he did not mean an afterlife kingdom: he referred to the Earthly setup proposed by King Herod.
FALLOUT WITH ESSENES
Those days, General, the Davidic heir used the title “Jacob” rather than “David” as the latter title was very risky, particularly under the Hasmonean government. Given that Joseph was the most beloved son of the Old Testament Jacob, the next in line, that is, the firstborn son of the Jacob, used the title “Joseph”.
In September 44 BC, a son was born to Jacob-Eliakim. As the crown prince to the Jacob, he was given the titular name Joseph, the name by which he became best-known. Like his father Jacob-Eliakim, Joseph was a missionary. But he also had a trade. He was a carpenter, a boat builder primarily, and a master of his craft. The word translated “carpenter” in the Bible is the ancient Greek word “ho hekton” which means a master artisan or craftsman.
In 31 BC, Qumran, the Essenes’ Judean wilderness bastion, was struck by an earthquake. The hermitic Essenes had no choice but to trek back to Jerusalem, from where they operated indefinitely at a place they called the Essene Gate. Then in 23 BC, Herod struck again. He had Jacob-Eliakim killed on trumped-up charges of sedition, his motive simply being a continuation of a systematic purge of the Davidic “pretenders” to his throne.
The Essenes were wroth. They now set about promulgating to the Diaspora Essenes that Herod would have no part to play in the coming Kingdom. Instead, the overall King would be Joseph, the son of Jacob-Eliakim. This, General, was the beginning of a permanent rift between Herod and the Essene sect.
THE SAGA OF JOSEPH
The prospective global world, General, was subdivided into ten provinces to facilitate governance and tax collection. Palestine would have two provinces, Judea and Samaria, the latter of which would include Galilee. Asia Minor (largely present-day Turkey), where the bulk of Diaspora Jews were concentrated, would have five provinces.
The last three provinces would be Babylon, Rome, and Alexandria in Egypt. The future capital of the West was not Rome: it was Ephesus in Asia Minor. Having been allocated the West, it was in Ephesus and Alexandria that Jacob-Eliakim spent most of his time evangelizing to fellow Jews about the future Kingdom of Israel. This was the beginning of the New Covenant, whereby Jews who converted to the ideal of a new Kingdom of Israel were baptised by immersion in water.
To mainstream Palestinian Jews, General, Jacob-Eliakim was a sellout. Herod had demoted his pedigree but to somewhat placate him, he gave him the honorary title of Patriarch or Prince of Jerusalem. By subordinating the Davidic throne-in-waiting to Herod, Jacob-Eliakim had gone against what the nation of Israel’s God, Enlil, the Bible’s main Jehovah, decreed – that every King of Judah had to be a descendant of David. So when the unpredictable Herod had him killed in 23 BC for “sedition”, as part of a pogrom against the line of David, there was very little sympathy for him.
In 44 BC, Joseph had been born to Jacob-Eliakim. Joseph was a title: it was not his real name. At the death of his father, Joseph became the Jacob. However, he preferred the title “David”, the more apt one historically. Joseph would become the father of Jesus. When Joseph attained 30 years of age in 14 BC, his uncles and the Essene sages sent him to Rome and Alexandria to do his part in missionary work, which was simply about promulgating to the Diaspora Jews the future Kingdom of Israel in which a Son of David, that is a descendant of King David, would rule. Egypt was also a special place because Joseph’s maternal relations were Egyptians.
Jacob-Eliakim, General, had two wives. The one was called Euchariah, a Jewish princess, of whom very little is known, and the other, the dynastic wife, was an Egyptian princess, a daughter of Queen Cleopatra VII of Egypt and Julius Caesar. Jacob-Eliakim and this princess had three sons: they were Joseph, the father of Jesus, and the twins Cleopas (after whom James, Jesus’ immediate younger brother, whose given name was Cleopas, was named) and Ptolas. Joseph was thus the Davidian Prince of Israel as well as contender to Crown Prince of Egypt. Despite pretences to the contrary on the part of the Jews, Egypt and Israel have always had ties of monarchical kinship.
In 8 BC, General, Joseph was required by Essene custom to return home and fulfill his obligations for a dynastic marriage. A wife-to-be had already been chosen for him by his uncles and other patriarchal Essenes. This was Dorcas, better known today by her title name Mary.