Connect with us
Advertisement

Ninurta Bombs Tower of Babel

Benson C Saili
THIS EARTH, MY BROTHER  
 

… as Enlilites programme multiple languages into Marduk’s people and scatter them all over the Earth

With Marduk having cocked a snoop at him, Enlil called a meeting with his brood to decide how once again they were going to tame the “Great Serpent”, as Marduk was deprecatingly dubbed. Says the Sumerian records: “Marduk an unpermitted Gateway to Heaven is building, to Earthlings it he is entrusting! So did Enlil to his sons and grandchildren say. If this we allow to happen, no other matter of Mankind shall be unreached!  This is just the beginning of their undertakings:  from now on, anything that they shall scheme to do shall no longer be impossible for  them."


Enlil’s statement is pregnant with insight as to how all-powerful mankind would be with their own spaceport courtesy of their leader Marduk. We were going to be on par with the Anunnaki in terms of our technological potential. Nothing would be beyond our ken anymore. We would travel to space, explore other planets, reach every  corner  of Earth, discover new mineral deposits, mine them, harness them, beneficiate them by manufacturing arms, partake of Ormus at will, ad infinitum. Marduk was right.
 

The spaceport was his first major step toward the empowerment wholly and totally of mankind.  Marduk did not intend to keep us in eternal ignorance like Enlil did: he wanted to elevate us to the same level as the Anunnaki in one quantum  leap. Remember, his aim was to be the King of this planet  and as such, he wanted to reign over fully enlightened and capable people who would make Earth a planet to reckon with not only in the Solar System but across the whole cosmos. He was born on the throne planet of Orion, had grown up on the throne planet of Sirius, had spent time on planet Nibiru, and had lived on planet Mars. So he had a good idea of the kind of planet Earth was going to be when he was the new Enlil.

On the other hand, Enlil was not interested in the welfare of this planet. All the Anunnaki had been instructed to vacate the planet by King Anu once mankind was sufficiently civilised. Only Marduk was strictly barred from ever returning to Nibiru or the Sirius star system for having “defiled  himself” when he married Sarpanit, a  full Earthling.  Ninurta had the option to return to Nibiru but like Marduk, he too wanted to rise to the supremacy of Earth but he was not popular to Earthlings in general in view of his having gassed Africans in the Second Pyramid War. Thus in the battle for the hearts of the human race, he had already lost. Inevitably, he was sorely jealous of Marduk’s popularity with Earthlings. Marduk had to be stopped in his tracks at all costs.     

THE LAUNCH TOWER IS STRUCK


Exactly how was Marduk going to be stopped? The Enlilites settled for three  courses of action. First, the tower must be destroyed. Second, a divide and rule scheme must be implemented. Hitherto, all the Earthlings had one universal language which made co-operation a very easy proposition. From now on, they should be introduced to new and radically different languages which should set them apart from each other and therefore weaken their bonds. Thirdly, all of Marduk’s people must be driven out of Babylon and scattered all over the world so that they lose a sense of oneness.

The first phase of the resolution was entrusted to Ninurta and was conducted under cover of darkness, which did not make any difference as the construction team was working round the clock to complete the project and lived in a huge camp around the construction site. At any given time, about two-thirds of the workforce were on site. General  Ninurta settled at the controls of a fighter craft, one of an armada that was equipped with bunker-bursting bombs, and led the way from Nippur to Babylon at breakneck sped. About half an hour later, the Earth was heard to shake across Sumer as the bombs were unleashed on Marduk’s only partially complete space-launch tower.

“It was night time when from Nibruki (Nippur) the Enlilite Anunnaki came,” say the Sumerian records. “From their skyships, havoc upon the rising tower, fire and brimstones, they rained.” The results were spectacularly gory. According to the apocryphal Book of Jasher, one-third of the Babylonians were so blown to bits they could not be traced and another one-third were unearthed from the rabble but with fatal burns that made them unidentifiable. Only the one-third that were not on the site survived. “To the tower and the whole encampment a complete end they made,” say the Sumerian texts. Marduk was devastated. “The incident of the Tower of Babel brought to an unexpected end the longest era of Peace on Earth that Man can recall,” writes Zechariah Sitchin.

Next, the survivors were rounded up, herded into cargo “sky birds” and ocean liners, and taken to new places near and far as armed Enlilites kept watch over them.  Writes Andrea Paris in Planet of Gold: “The forefathers of the Alaskan Eskimos, the Japanese, and even the Egyptians have been transported to where they are now according to their mythology. In fact, the Eskimo mythology tells us their forefathers had been transported there inside ‘big metal birds’.” Once they landed in these totally foreign locations, Marduk’s people  were artificially and mentally programmed with new languages that erased the language they originally spoke. Few people are aware that a language can be programmed into one’s psyche.

High-level ex-Satanists from the Western world who have become Christians have testified that they were able to speak foreign languages which had been programmed into them.  I know you are wondering how this is possible but to those in the know it’s pretty simple. Everything, including language, is energy and energy is differentiated by what are known as frequencies. So, if you know the frequency of a language and you know how to manipulate that frequency, you can erase it from the DNA and introduce a new language frequency or frequencies in the same DNA.

The authors of Genesis present the “confusion of languages” as though it was done magically when it was not. But we need not bash them too hard for this: they didn’t understand phenomena in the way we do today and thus anything that was atypical was a miracle to them. The term “Babel” has come to denote “confusion”. This stems from the word play the Genesis writers employed in relating “Bab-ili” (Babylon) with the Hebrew word “Bll”, which means to confuse or mix up.  By the same token,  the term “shem” has spawned such sorry terms  as “sham” or “shame”. It all harps back to the shame and sham the project to construct a platform from which to launch shems became.

MARDUK CLASHES WITH ZIDDA

Initially, Marduk dug in his heels: he vowed that despite losing great numbers of people and seeing his project reduced to rabble, he still was going to remain in Babylon. His immediate younger brother Nergal, however, told him there was no need for him to create unnecessary friction with the Enlilites, who had given him an ultimatum to leave Sumer. The Age of the Ram, when he was scheduled to rule Earth, was around the corner. He should therefore simply bide his time and keep a low profile till his eligibility day arrived. “Let us peacefully wait for the true signs of heaven,” Nergal pleaded with his brother.

Marduk was persuaded but he was in no hurry to move: he waited for another 10 years (10 was his ranking in the Anunnaki pantheon) before he and his followers retraced their way to the “Land of the Two Narrows”, an epithet for Egypt. This was in the year 3450 BC. Marduk’s choice of Egypt was only secondarily because it was the headquarters of the Enkites. His underlying motive was to reinstate himself to the rulership of Egypt to take advantage of the new dispensation that was looming: King Anu had stipulated that in 3100 BC, the “Second Region” (as the Enkite lands were known) was to be civilised too just as Sumer had been in 3800 BC. Again the 700-year interval had to do with the number 7, which was Enlil’s celestial number (Earth, over which Enlil ruled, was the 7th planet counting from Pluto).  

But when Marduk arrived to reclaim the throne of Egypt, he was opposed by his younger brother Ningishzidda, who was vying for the throne too.  Zidda, known as Tehuti in Egypt (Thoth in English) and the most popular Anunnaki after his father Enki, first ruled the country from 8670 to 7100 BC as the compromise choice according to the terms of the Enkite-Enlilite accord following the end of the Second Pyramid War.   After ruling for 1570 years, he handed over to demigods – those who were part Earthling part Anunnaki – who reigned for a total of 3650 years, that is, from 7100 to 3450 BC. The demigods were interrupted by the returning Marduk, who issued an abrupt decree that their era was over as the boss was back.  But the Egyptians were divided: most wanted Zidda to take over instead of Marduk. Whilst they liked Marduk too, they feared he was too bellicose and was therefore liable to precipitate another devastating war with the Enlilites.  Besides, Marduk had never been seen in Egypt for over 300 years, having left in 3760 BC.

Enki as the family head loved his sons equally and so when each asked him for his blessings, his response was that they should sit down and iron out the matter between themselves.  This they did but they just could not come to terms. Marduk gave Zidda to understand that he was Enki’s firstborn and was therefore entitled to rule Egypt, and that even during the years when Zidda ruled Egypt, he was just holding fort for him. Marduk also pointed out the wrongs Zidda had committed whilst Marduk was away. For example, Zidda had Horus, who also had ambitions to rule Egypt again, restricted to “a desert place …  a place that has no water, a boundless place where sexual pleasures are not enjoyed”. Zidda just had to give way: it was either Marduk’s way or the highway. “Pay heed,” Marduk said to his younger brother. “I am here in my proper place! You have been my place-taker. From now on, only a deputy of mine you can be. But if to rebellion you are inclined, to another land go away you must!”

Zidda replied that he didn’t want to rule Egypt because he was personally ambitious: it was all in keeping with the terms of the peace at the conclusion of the Second Pyramid War in 8670 BC, which stipulated that Marduk should never ever rule Egypt. “I wouldn’t want to see the Enlilites attack us again because we’re in breach of the peace accord,” he tried to reason with his brother. Marduk said to hell with the Enlilites. He was going to rule Egypt whether they liked it or not.   

ZIDDA IN SELF-EXILE
    
For the next 350 years (337 years to be exact: 350 is just a approximation), a period scholars have described as a “chaotic time during which Egypt was disunited and in disarray”, there was a stalemate between Marduk and Zidda as to who should be sole ruler of Egypt. None of the two really called the shots. Some people recognised Marduk as the ruler and others deferred to Zidda. Finally, Enki decided to intervene. In 3113 BC, he approached Zidda and besought him to give up his contention for rulership for the sake of peace.  In fact, Enki suggested it was best that Zidda departs Egypt altogether and found his own domain as far afield as Mesoamerica, where he would have no competition whatsoever as the Anunnaki did not particularly  favour that part of the world owing to its comparatively hotter  climate then.  

The one good thing about Zidda was that he was unfailingly obedient to his father, the only one among Enki’s six sons who was so submissive. He acceded to his father’s pleas all right but he did not head to “The Land Beyond the Oceans” straightway: instead he made a beeline for Babylon, where Marduk had been expelled from in 3450 BC. From that time henceforth, Zidda adopted the number 52 as his talismanic number. Why 52?     
Well, he had ruled Egypt for 1570 years. Then he had been the ceremonial monarch (when the demigods ruled at his behest) for 3650 years.    His effective uncontested rulership of Egypt therefore added up to 5220 years. If you round this figure off to only two digits, it amounts to 52.

The other explanation for the enigmatic number of 52 can be gleaned from Zechariah Sitchin. It has to do with the geometrical miracle Zidda wrought in the Great Pyramid. “The Great Pyramid has four triangular sides that rise at the tricky angle of 52 degrees,” writes Sitchin in his The War of the Gods. “The rather steep angle of 52 degrees has been attained in Egypt only in the Giza pyramids, which were built neither by Cheops or any other Pharaoh but by the gods of the ancient Near East, as beacons for landing at their spaceport in the Sinai peninsula. All the other Egyptian pyramids—lesser, smaller, decayed, or collapsed—were indeed built by Pharaohs, millennia later, in emulation of the gods’‘stairways to heaven’. But none succeeded in attaining the perfect angle of 52 degrees and whenever this was attempted, the attempt ended in collapse.”

Still another explanation is that the number 52 represented the 52 weeks of a year. Marduk was ecstatic at Zidda’s departure. No sooner had Zidda left than he set out to erase his memory in the hearts of Egyptians forever. First, he had Zidda’s face on the Great Sphinx replaced with his (Marduk) most beloved son/grandson Osiris. Second, he withdrew Zidda’s lunar-based calendar and introduced the solar-based calendar to accord with his boast as the Sun God. Finally, he introduced Base 10 mathematics and did away with sexagesmal or Base 60 mathematics. Again this was to accord with his ranking of 10 in the Anunnaki pantheon.    

But it wasn’t Zidda only who Marduk wanted to blot out from the memories of his people. In Thebes, there was a sculpture of the Bull, an icon of Enlil and which some of the Egyptians reverenced. Marduk destroyed it and had a new sculpture of  the Bull erected but which showed it  “pierced and deflated” to betoken the fate of Enlil when Marduk replaced him at the dawn of the Age of the Ram. Marduk in fact proceeded to erect huge sculptures of the ram throughout Egypt as a harbinger of his imminent supremacy over the whole planet.   


And in order to prepare Egypt for its own civilisation that was to take effect in 3100 BC, Marduk asked Enki to provide him with the MEs, the computer chips that encrypted more than 100 aspects of civilisation. Enlil hearkened to his son’s plea.  The MEs embodied all manner of knowledge except that pertaining to raising the dead. The only Anunnaki who had knowledge of restoring the dead to life were Enki and Zidda. Marduk was distraught that his father had denied him this knowledge.

THE FIRST ROTHSCHILDS AND ROCKEFELLERS

Like Zidda before him, Marduk did not intend to rule Egyptians directly but through a supine demigod. He himself would simply be   the superintending “god”. The title he chose for the demigod was Peraa, or Pharaoh in modern spelling.  Paraphrased, it meant “He of the Great House”. The “Great House”  was a metaphor for the Egyptian royal institution which was headed by Marduk. The first Pharaoh was Mena, or Menes as he’s best known. Likely a bastard son of Marduk himself (the Sumerian records say he was an offspring of a Neteru, as the Anunnaki were called in Egypt, and an  Earthling), he was the  founder of the First Dynasty and he’s credited for having united upper and lower Egypt. Menes built his capital along a line where Upper and Lower Egypt met and called it Mena Nefer, meaning “Mena’s Beauty”. His aim was to make Mena Nefer rival the Sumerian city-state of Kish in terms  of glory and splendour.

But you and I know that a King is only a figurehead. Marduk entrusted his priests and offspring to administer Egypt, the people who wielded real power.   Now, let us first recognise that Marduk’s full title as the god of Egypt was Rra Ka, meaning “The Universal Sun God” or “The Supreme Conscience”   (Ka was consciousness in Egyptian).    Rra Ka assigned his offspring to manage the wealth of his empire. They were referred to as the Ra Kam, meaning “Children of Rra”.

As his offspring, they were his shield and therefore the  term Kam came to mean  “shield”.   The Rakam were “Ra’s Shield”. Today, this is … Rothschild! The Rothschilds not only are the wealthiest clan on Earth but they are the ones running the major banks of much of the world.  It is said Rothschild means “Red Shield.” You and I know that the Red Shield is the coat of arms of the Vatican. Thus the Rothschilds in truth serve not themselves but the Jesuit-General, also known as the Black Pope – the most powerful visible being on Earth.

For the day-to-day administration of the empire, Marduk appointed an elite group of priests who were not related to him to see to that. These priests, the Lord Administrators of the empire, were known as the Rakaperaa (or Rakapharoahs), meaning “Holy Ones of the Great House”.  The Rakaperaas are today known as … the Rockefellers. It is the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers  who conduct the day-to-day affairs of the world. There’s more than meets the eye to this Earth, my
Brother.  

NEXT WEEK: THE FEATS OF ZIDDA AND HIS BLACK ANUNNAKI
 

Continue Reading

Columns

Honesty – a fundamental human characteristic

12th October 2021

“When honesty is lost, then wait for the Hour (the Day of Judgment)”.  These are the words of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh).  They paint a picture of the time leading up to the Day of Judgement, when righteous people will be sorrowful due to the lack of honesty around them. 

Influence of materialism

Honesty, like morality, is an in built and essential characteristic of every human but the influence of materialism and the greed and desire for status, position, fame, wealth, etc. have wreaked havoc in human society, to an extent never seen before. In the 21st century, we live in a world where honesty is less valued than ever before and in fact even shunned at times.  We expect people to be honest in their dealings with us yet we ourselves promote deceit and dishonesty through our action and speech on a daily basis.  Many of us even watch and applaud television shows and movies that promote and encourage lying, infidelity and deceitfulness.

Desire for worldly gain

In the corporate world, ‘deceitful’ statements and figures are announced and pronounced to lure investors, glamorous yet deceitful adverts to attract customers, etc. have all become the norm and honesty goes out of the window. Even in the media industry, honesty seems to be waning very rapidly. Let alone the due regard of one’s conscience but without a second thought or due consideration of the rights of the others, stories are churned out with so-called “sensational” add-ons, etc. simply for the sake of being the “first” to break the news or for the sake of having the “best” story or maybe even for the sake of just having increased an readership or viewership.

Thoughtless individual behaviour

Without thinking, we indirectly teach our children that dishonesty is acceptable.  When we expect our children to tell the caller on the telephone we are not home, this is a lesson in deceit.  When we answer the cellphone and say that we are busy in a meeting yet we very much relaxed and free, or we say we are out of town yet we are at home, etc. we are being blatantly dishonest. When we refuse to settle our debts and dues making all sorts of pretences, we are actually lying.  We admonish and reprimand our children for lying, yet the reality is we have been their teachers.  Whether we tell lies, or whether we allow our children to live in a world surrounded by deceit, the lesson is learned and the honesty begins to disappear from the hearts of people – in particular the next generation.

Integrity and reliability

We must understand that honesty incorporates the concepts of truthfulness and reliability and it resides in all human thought, words, actions and relationships.  It is more than just accuracy; it is more than just truthfulness, it denotes integrity or moral soundness.  Belief in God Almighty commands truthfulness and forbids lying.  In the Holy Quran, God Almighty commands that humans be honest: “O you who believe!  Be conscious of God Almighty, and be with those who are true (in word and deeds).” (Ch  9 : v 119). A renowned Holy Quran scholar explained the meaning of this verse.  He said, “Being truthful and adhering to truthfulness, means you will be among the people of the truth (by speaking and behaving in a truthful manner) and be saved from calamity and that is what will really make a way out for you from your problems (in the long run)”.

Honesty and truthfulness go hand in hand

A true Believer, one who is truly submitted to God, has many characteristics by which he/she can be identified.  The most obvious of these noble characteristics are honesty of character and truthfulness of speech.  Prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him) was a perfect example of honesty.  The records of history clear show that even before he was bestowed Prophet hood by The Almighty, he had earned the titles of “As Saadiq” (the truthful) and “Al Ameen” (the trustworthy one), within the community. They had full trust in his honesty and integrity to such a degree that they would accept anything he said. Prophet Muhammed (pbuh), once gathered all the people of Makkah at the base of Mount Safa and asked them, “O people of Makkah!  If I say to you that an army is advancing on you from behind the mountains, will you believe me?”  All said in one voice, “Yes, because we have never heard you telling a lie.”  All the people, without exception, swore to his truthfulness and honesty because he had lived an unblemished and extremely upright life among them up to that point in time – for forty years.

Honesty in a comprehensive manner

This honesty, an essential ingredient of the human character, includes being truthful towards God by worshipping Him sincerely; being truthful to oneself, by adhering to God’s laws; and being truthful with others by speaking the truth and being honest in all dealings, such as buying, selling, social interaction, marriage,etc.  There should be no deceiving, cheating, falsifying or withholding of information, thus a person should be the same on the inside as he/she is on the outside.

Prophetic teachings

Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) informed us of the great benefits of living in an honest and truthful way and warned us of the dangers inherent in dishonesty and falsehood.  He said: “Truthfulness leads to righteousness, and righteousness leads to Paradise.  In addition, a person keeps on telling the truth until they are recorded by God Almighty as a very truthful person.  And falsehood leads to wickedness (and evil-doing), and wickedness leads to the (Hell) Fire. In addition, and a person keeps on telling lies until they are recorded by God Almighty as a very great liar”.

For those who wish to be among the truthful, Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) has left us with these words of guidance, “Let he who believes in God and the Last Day either speak good or (otherwise) remain silent”.

A successful, vibrant society is based upon honesty and justice, and is intolerant of dishonesty in all its various forms.  The Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) exhorted the faithful to be scrupulously honest in all their social dealings, business transactions, etc. at all times.

Continue Reading

Columns

A Sham of a Trial

12th October 2021

Verdict a foregone conclusion as Pilate is bought

Although the interrogation of  Jesus in a joint hearing by Annas and Caiaphas was not a trial, General Atiku, it was more or less conducted along the lines of a trial.

Jesus had a defending witness. This was one of  his disciples, Bartholomew, whose real name was John Marcus. Apparently, Jesus was allowed only one such witness. Besides his principal accuser, the turncoat Judas Iscariot, there were a number of witnesses who testified against him. The gospels  refer to them as false witnesses but this is probably an exaggeration: they simply misunderstood some of his statements largely because he tended to use allegorical language, which could be properly interpreted only by Gnostics. On occasion, he chose to be deliberately ambiguous, as when he said, “Do to Caesar what is due to Caesar and to God what is due to God.”

The crux of the matter  was whether there was anything in his conduct that could associate him with the Zealots. For example, he was accused of harbouring and voicing designs to destroy the Jerusalem Temple within “three days”. The Zealots did band about such threats, General. In truth, what they sought to destroy it was the Temple establishment – the priesthood and the Herodian Sadducees. The perception was that these somewhat benefitted from Roman patronage. Thus, if Jesus did instigate doing way with the Temple establishment by foul and crook, this could obviously not sit well with Annas and Caiaphas, both of whom belonged to this clique. But Jesus’ words had been taken out of context. In Gnostic language, the Temple (the correct translation should be “palace”  as the Jewish word for temple and palace is the same)   was the human body because it housed the real being – the spirit-soul. So what Jesus was saying to those who wished him ill, General, was that even if they physically killed him, his soul would continue to live (a person can be clinically dead but at the etheric level, he is irreversibly dead only after three days). Clearly, General, he was grossly misunderstood.

Jesus vehemently denied being a Zealot. He made it clear to the panel that every time he taught or preached, he was heard to promote peaceful co-existence with Rome. How then could he be a Zealot, who preached enmity with the Romans? Put differently, General, Jesus was saying he had played no part whatsoever in the November 32 AD riots against Pilate. The fact that Simon Zelotes was his father-in-law was pure happenstance.

In their heart of hearts, both Caiaphas and Annas were aware Jesus was not inclined to violence and therefore could not be a  Zealot. So the matter they seized upon was his claim to be Priest, Prophet, and King. This was what revolted them the most, the sin for which they sought to teach him a lesson.  The gospels say they set men (the Jerusalem Temple police who had escorted Caiaphas) on him who blindfolded him, slapped him around, spat on him, and dared him to “prophesy” as to “who has hit you” – a sneering allusion to his claim to be Priest and Prophet as only the High Priest could prophesy. This physical mockery did probably take place but there is an underlying symbolic language, General.  When a person was spat upon (by a “holy man”, such as the  High Priest),  it meant he had been demoted from priest to a mere layman. A “blind man” was another characterisation for an Essene who was of Grade 8 level, a novice. A novice was not yet initiated and therefore he was blind because he had not yet “seen the light”, that is, not yet been illuminated.

What it all boils down to, General,  is that by decree of the three priests Annas Sr, Caiaphas, and Jonathan Annas, Jesus had been downgraded from Grade 2, the third position in the Essene hierarchy (the first two being Grades 0 and 1), which was the position of the Davidic King (now held by his young brother James), to Grade 8, the position of a novice, a virtual nobody. Thus, when he appeared before Pontius Pilate, that was the status he would declare when his occupation was asked of him. This lowly social status would significantly bear upon Pilate’s psychology and therefore his contemplation of Jesus.

PETER DOES A JUDAS

Now, when a hearing or trial was in progress, General,  the Essene rule was that there had to be two doorkeepers. These were two people who were close to the person who was the subject of the proceedings, typically a relative and an associate/friend.

In the case of Jesus, the doorkeepers he selected were Simon Peter and his mother Mary. Besides being Jesus’ disciple, Simon Peter was Jesus’ personal bodyguard and chief ecclesiastical minister. As the Davidic King, Jesus was entitled to a bodyguard and chief spokesman, both roles of which were ably performed by Peter. That made Peter arguably the closest to Jesus in an occupational sense. As for Mary, she substituted for Jesus’ wife Mary Magdalene, who was now three months pregnant and therefore was on mandatory separation from her husband according to Essene dynastic procreational rules. The two doorkeepers ceremonially opened the doors for the panelists or judges to enter the hearing room. As the male doorkeeper,  Simon Peter stood by the door in the inner corridor whilst Mary stood by the same door in the outer corridor.

Peter, however, had been assigned another role – that of the rooster of the night. The rooster that crowed three times as per the gospels was not a bird, General: it was Simon Peter. “Rooster”, or “Cock”,   was the term for a religious person assigned to call out the time. Remember,  they had no clocks those days and at nighttime, the sundial, which was used during the day to read time, could not be used. So during a momentous occasion such as this one (the week of Passover), a person was detailed to announce the time every three hours at Qumran. Since Jesus’ hearing took place shortly before midnight, Peter was expected to announce the times at 00:00; 3 am; and 6 am. 3 am was specifically called cock-crow (see MARK 13:34). It was just before 3 am that Peter “denied”  Jesus. He did not deny him at three intervals, General: he denied him only once but before three inquisitors.

Now, Simon Peter was also a Zealot, a point we have long underscored. It explains why in the gospels he comes across as combustible, argumentative, and highly assertive. He was known as Simon Bar-jonah, which has been wrong translated as “son of John”. Bar-jonah actually derived from “baryona”, which was Aramaic (the most widely spoken language of the day in Palestine) for “outlaw”. We know, courtesy of  Flavius Josephus, that Zealots were referred to as outlaws by the Romans. So as Jesus was being interrogated, one of the witnesses against him made mention of the fact that he must have been a Zealot since his own bodyguard was a Zealot. Peter was therefore instantly called upon to confirm or deny that he was a Zealot. As could be expected, Peter stoutly denied he was. He also proceeded to say that he was not as close to Jesus as many people thought.

Once he had exculpated himself, Peter resumed his vigil as doorkeeper. The hearing lasted for hours and there were intervals in between, during which Peter also took time off to warm himself before a fire. During one such break, Mary, Joseph (Jesus’ second brother)  and James (the son of Zebedee) also confronted him and demanded to know why he  without shame or scruple just stopped short of disowning Jesus. Peter was unflinching, saying they were all mistaken: he was not as close to Jesus as they thought. It was at this point that he stood up to announce the time 3 am for the hearings to resume. Shortly thereafter, it dawned on him that he had stabbed Jesus in the back and later apologised teary-eyed to Mary. The man Jesus called “Rocky” was far from being a rock: he was a chicken, a flip-flopper.  Maybe it was no coincidence, General, that on this fateful night he was assigned the role of a male chicken!

That said, Peter had very valid reasons to deny Jesus anyway. Jesus had elevated Judas Iscariot to his second-in-command in an independent Israel at the Last Supper and Peter was irate that that role should have been entrusted to him and not to Judas. Maybe Jesus deserved Peter’s betrayal given that Peter had served him loyally through and through both as a bodyguard and confidante.

JUDAS TREACHERY BACKFIRES

Pontius Pilate, General, arrived at Qumran towards 6 in the morning to conduct a kangaroo court trial for the people wanted for the November 32 AD uprising in which some Roman soldiers were killed. Why, if we may ask, General,  did the Roman governor have to travel all the way from Jerusalem, where he was based during the Passover week, to Qumran and not insist that the trial be held in Jerusalem itself?

There were two reasons for this in the main. First and foremost, there was something in it for him. He had been backhanded with a tantalising bribe by Herod Agrippa to excuse Judas Iscariot. We know Pilate was hopelessly weak where it came to palm-greasing and extra-legal trials. Philo, the Jewish philosopher and historian who was a contemporary of  Pilate, records that Pilate was prone to corruption (a streak that ran through all Roman governors and of which the emperor himself was acutely aware) and “continuous executions without even a form of a trial”. Second, a trial of the leading Zealots in Jerusalem at Passover time would have provoked another uprising as Jerusalem at this time of the year swarmed with Galilean pilgrims most of whom were either Zealots or pro-Zealot. Qumran was therefore a safe venue as it was remote and was not crawling with too many people. The trial would thus pass practically unnoticed by the wider population.

Arriving at Qumran, Pilate was determined that he was going to sentence the culprits (save for Judas of course) to death. The November uprising had tarnished the record of his emperor: it was the only insurrection in Judea during the reign of  Tiberius Caesar. Pilate would use the sentence as a showcase to the emperor that he was a no-nonsense man who did not in the least brook dissident tendencies.

Now, Herod Antipas had learnt of Agrippa’s bribe to Pilate and he and Agrippa rarely saw eye to eye, being rival claimants to the Jewish monarchy.  Antipas was aware that the crucifixion Jesus would be subjected to would not be fatal but a partial one that would ensure his survival. However, Theudas Barabbas was too old to bear the strain of even partial crucifixion whereas Jesus and Simon Zelotes were much younger. Chances therefore were that Barabbas might perish right on the cross.  So in a private meeting with Pilate before the trial commenced, Antipas offered Pilate a bribe substantially higher than that which Agrippa had given him. Accordingly, the two agreed that Judas should be reinstated as a culprit. At the same time, Barabbas should be released. It was game, set, and match, General.

MAKE-BELIEVE REFERAL TO ANTIPAS

The trial was held in the north vestry, the same place where the hearings by Annas and Caiaphas took place. Annas, Caiaphas, the Herods, and the brothers of Jesus were in attendance.

The trial, General, was a farce. The proceedings were almost wholly orchestrated. On trial was Judas Iscariot too, who courtesy of  the Antipas bribe had been re-arrested, bringing the number of  respondents in the dock to four. Judas, as the overall commander of the Zealots, pleaded guilty. That is what the gospels mean when they say he “hung himself”. Now penitent of having falsely implicated Jesus, Judas also told the court that Jesus was innocent and had played no part whatsoever in the November 32 AD insurrection. Judas’ absolution of  Jesus is what is cryptically referred to in the gospels as “returning the 30 pieces of silver to the chief priest”, meaning he no longer was leader of the 30-man group that John the Baptist had established: its leadership had now reverted to the current Essene high priest Jonathan Annas. Judas was resultantly sentenced to death by crucifixion along with Simon Zelotes and Theudas Barabbas.

However, General, Agrippa was determined that Jesus be found guilty in order to get even with his brother-in-law Antipas. He and Caiaphas were in full flow, insisting that Jesus not only was a “Galilean”, which was another code name for Zealots, but he urged Jews to refrain from paying taxes and also fancied himself as “King of the Jews” when that title now belonged to Emperor Tiberius Caesar. This was treason and for that he deserved to die.

Although Pilate had no intentions of acquitting Jesus (it was he who was to be sacrificed for Barabbas as per his stratagem with Antipas), he at least wanted to superficially cast himself as a reasonable and impartial judge. Judas had exonerated Jesus and the priests had countered that. So Pilate announced to the gathering that since Jesus was of Galilean origin (he feigned ignorance of the fact that the term Galilean was used in the context of  his being a Zealot), Herod Antipas, under whose  jurisdiction Galilee fell, was to break the ice. Antipas was asked to try Jesus in another room and whatever verdict he rendered would be binding. This aspect was not part of the pre-plan with Antipas but Antipas did welcome it nonetheless as it openly underlined that in the eyes of  Rome, he took precedence over his rival Agrippa. As for Agrippa, all he could do was froth at the mouth. From that day on, General, Pilate became his mortal enemy: on the other hand, Antipas and Pilate became abiding friends.

NEXT WEEK: JESUS SACRIFICES FOR HIS BROTHER

Continue Reading

Columns

Distress Flare

12th October 2021

No one could have predicted what we have just gone through with COVID 19, lock downs, State of Emergency, banning of international travel etc. etc. In fact that’s not quite true as many had been predicating the possibility of a global pandemic for a while – I guess it was the case of not listening or not wanting to listen.

This week I was left thinking what life would be like if the internet crashed. This was prompted after being deprived of social media when the services of Facebook, Instagram & WhatsApp were disrupted for hours on Monday night. I am not much of a user of the 2 former platforms but I do use Whatsapp extensively and even had a call scheduled on the app which I was clearly unable to make. It is also the main way that I keep immediately updated of family whereabouts, comms etc.

Like many I felt quite cut off even though I could have made a normal telephone call or gone on the internet and sent mail messages. People kept saying that the internet was down because to some people Facebook is the internet!  Twitter, realising this, saw it as the perfect time to enjoy its rare spotlight and tweeted “Hello literally everyone” from its main account. It garnered 2.4 million “likes” in just four hours and a stampede of users eager to sign up.

In other parts of the world where apps are essential to commerce, health care and basic functioning of government it was a serious matter. In India, doctors sounded the alarm about being unable to coordinate their schedules or share patient scans. And in Malaysia, some small-business owners were left without a way to manage day-to-day operations as all business communications are conducted through the app.

In many developing countries, services including WhatsApp, Facebook and Facebook Messenger have become deeply integrated into the delivery of primary health care, education and other government services,” Marcus Leaning, a digital media education professor at the University of Winchester in the U.K., said. “In the global North, we tend to (merely) use such services as supplementary to other channels of communication, so the global outage will have a disproportionate impact.”  These platforms are also often offered on restricted-access (or non-smart) phones, meaning that those on lower income were disproportionately  disaffected in 3rd World countries, our own included.

Meanwhile, as netizens (citizens of the internet) were feeling somewhat inconvenienced and annoyed, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg took a financial hit losing $6 billion in just a few hours as Facebook stocks plunged, principally through lost advertising revenue and loss of business confidence and he himself personally dropped to No. 5 on the list of the world’s richest, below Gates. Talk about a bad day at the office!

The impact on myself was considerably less but with my ability to WhatsApp stopped I did feel quite put out and wondered what it would be like if the whole internet crashed one day and what that would it do to the markets, the military, the hospitals, not to mention how would I be able access all the movies on Netflix?

It couldn’t really happen, could it, if you understand that all the internet is, is a bunch of interconnected computers and that they would all have to crash at once? Conventional wisdom tells us that as a planetary network of computers and machines the internet is too big, too decentralised and too redundant to all fail at once?  But wait! Didn’t they say something similar when the Titanic was built? Surely the lessons of that hubris are still valid today?

According to Laura Brandimarte, Assistant Professor, Management Information Systems, University of Arizona, ‘Everything being connected today may bring along significant convenience, but it also implies that everything can be hacked. What if the nation’s power grid were successfully attacked? No electricity also means no internet access. The internet also relies on physical infrastructure, such as subsea cables and other fiber cables: any infrastructure issues (cable cuts, damages), whether due to criminal activity or natural disasters that were to affect major subsea cables could potentially shut down the Internet.

In a different sense, authoritarian governments can also potentially shut down the internet if they somehow all colluded against it, either blocking internet access to citizens altogether (we have seen that in Egypt during the Arab Spring, for example, or in the Democratic Republic of the Congo  HYPERLINK “https://www.rappler.com/world/regions/africa/81477-dr-congo-block-internet-kinshasa” \t “_blank” during a period of unrest); or substantially limiting it (we see that in countries where internet censorship is widespread and information access is controlled by the central government, as it happens in China). There are ways around censorship, of course: Privacy Enhancing Technologies, or PETs, such as virtual private networks or VPNs, and anonymous browsers such as Tor, can help circumvent it, but censorship essentially prevents the vast majority of the population, who may not be familiar with these tools, to access the internet, de facto making it disappear.’

And there are natural disasters that also could create havoc.   Patrick Juola, a computer science professor at Duquesne University, offers up one such interplanetary electronic disaster. “A sufficiently powerful solar flare could produce an electromagnetic solar pulse [EMP] that would shut down most of the computers in the world. While some systems are protected against EMPs, any human-built protection is only so strong, and the sun can be a lot more powerful.”

 

An internet crash resulting from this type of solar flare sounds like science fiction or one of those once-every-10,000-years events, but it isn’t. The worst recorded X-class (highest level) solar flare, called the Carrington Event, was a coronal mass ejection that produced a geomagnetic storm that spread across the earth over two days, September 1-2, 1859. The storm produced auroras around the world. The ones in the northern hemisphere reached as far south as the Caribbean, and were so bright people in the north-eastern United States could read newspapers by their light at night. The major electric utilities affected were the telegraph systems that failed across Europe and North America. The telegraph pylons threw sparks and shocked operators still at their keys. 

The frequency of recorded CMEs is worrying. Less powerful geomagnetic storms were recorded in 1921 and 1960, and a 1989 storm disabled power over large sections of Quebec. Then, on July 23, 2012, a “Carrington-lass” solar superstorm narrowly missed the earth by nine days when it crossed the planet’s orbit.

The Titanic was built to be unsinkable – all engineers and scientists agreed to that. Yet obviously they had not thought of every conceivable scenario and so when the boat was in the wrong place at the wrong time, the rest, as they say, was history. The same must be true of the internet. The thing that can take it down – not so much governmental censorship but some of that super global warming we hear so much about – could yet prove its downfall.  Now that really is solar power!

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!