Was he Reptilian, Feline, Wolfen, Serpentine, Human or all of the above?
As natives of planet Earth, we are known as humans. How did we come to be known as such? There are two likely explanations. First, we were created, or rather fashioned, by Enki, the Anunnaki’s most surpassing intellect and arguably the most humane of them all. Enki’s other name was Ea. So we are Ea’s people. Ea can also be rendered as “Eu” or “Hu”. As such, we are Hu’s people or simply Hu-man.
The other cue we get from the multicultural Semsiye elders, who have studied the prehistoric language of the shamaness women known as the Udughan. The Udughan language was very much similar to today’s Mongolian. According to the Udughan, mankind was said to have very little spirit in him by the star people (aliens, the Anunnaki) since he was fashioned from a creature that was part animal.
The Anunnaki fancied themselves as Ori, or true spirit. Mankind on the other hand they disdained as Ere, a mediocre version of Ori. Mankind was therefore Ere-man. Since Ere would in some languages be pronounced Ea, and mankind was manu in some ancient languages such as Sanskrit, we became known as Ea-man or Hu-man in modern rendering.
We’re also called Earthlings in that we are indigenous to planet Earth. But how did our planet come to be called Earth? Again there are several explanations which spring from practically the same premise, some of which we have already touched upon. According to the Semsiye elders, one of the names by which our planet was known in antiquity was Uurdu, meaning the Dawn World (from Uur, dawn, and Du, place or world, in Udughan). Uurdu gave rise to Sumerian Eridu, meaning far-flung home.
In ancient languages, word syllables could be reversed without affecting the meaning in the slightest. As such, Eridu could also be rendered as Du-eri. It is Du-eri which is the source of the Latin Terra, meaning ground, Earth, or land. Uurdu and Eridu would over time morph into Ordu in Persian; Aratha in Aramaic; Erde in German; Erda in High German; Jordh in Icelandic; Jord in Danish; Airtha in Gothic; Erthe in Middle English; and finally Earth in today’s English.
The Semsiye elders offer an alternative explanation. They say the Anunnaki referred to mankind, their creation, as Ere, as explained above. But mankind was not simply Ere; he was Ere-ed, meaning primitive creatures who are property, or slaves in other words (from Ere, primitive creature/human; and ed, property/possession, in Udughan). And since mankind was spiritually inferior to the Anunnaki, he was known as Eri-ide, meaning “he of little spirit”. Eri-ide and Earth sound more or less phonetically similar.
Earth, it turns out, means place of people of second-rate spirit! (With all the perpetually ongoing wars, grinding poverty, induced disease, occultic spell-casting, exploitation of man by man, economic enslavement, glaring inequalities, rampant selfishness, atmospheric pollution without the merest care of the backlash on our own health, systemic corruption and graft, and unbridled cruelty to animals and other forms of nature, I wouldn’t argue with such a take.) The Semsiye elders go on to say man was also referred to as Eres. That meant he was confined only to this planet, or Earth-bound, in contrast to the Anunnaki who were spacefaring beings. Eres may account for why Earth is Ereds in Aramaic; Ertz in Kurdish, and Eretz in Hebrew.
ADAM MADE FROM BLOOD OF BLACK ANUNNAKI
The first viable humans were Adam and Eve. There are a host of interpretations to Adam’s name, a theme we have already dwelt upon, but the Semsiye elders interpret it two ways. First, Adam was actually Da-Ami, they say, which means “First of Life” (from Da, first, and Ami, life in Udughan). That strikes a chord given that Adam was the first functionally sound human being.
Second, Adam was A-tamu, meaning, “Of the Underworld”. Again as we pointed out in earlier pieces, Africa was in antiquity referred to as the underworld because of its southerly location and by virtue of its being crisscrossed with underground gold mines. Adam was created in southeast Africa at Enki’s biological R&D facility called Bit Shiimti, which paraphrased means “Life Factory”.
Was Adam black, white, yellow, brown, or red? Ancient records say he was dark-red, like blood. One meaning of Adam, or rather Adama, is “one who is like blood”. Adama is indeed one of the Hebrew words for Earth. Adam not only was the first Earthling; his skin colour resembled the soil of Africa, which is generally called red soil. Dark-red is actually black, the reason the ancients used black and red interchangeably. As scientifically attested, the first human Earthling was black and was African. Africa is the cradle of mankind.
But the question is, did Adam have to be black if genetics was allowed to have its way? This is a very pertinent question folks. It is worth posing because of two glaring contrarieties. First, we learn from the Sumerian records that Adam was a lulu – one of mixed race. He was part Anunnaki, part Ape-Man as we have long related. Now, the ruling pantheon of the Anunnaki, the Elohim, and to whom Enki belonged, were chalky white. What about Ape-Man? It has been taken for granted that since Ape-Man, Homo Erectus, sprang from an ape species with typical black fur, he must have been dark-skinned. That is totally, wholly, utterly, completely, and absolutely mistaken.
Ape-Man, folks, was not dark-skinned but actually white-skinned, like the Caucasians of our day. How do we know this? According to evolutional geneticists, we humans share the same ancestor as chimpanzees. The chimpanzee is our first cousin in the broader family of primates. Many people are not aware that the colour of the chimpanzee beneath the coating of black fur is white. If a chimpanzee were to be shaved clean and paraded around alive, it would look the colour of a Caucasian.
If the chimpanzee is white, it logically follows that Ape Man was white too. Inevitably therefore, Adam, the product of the white-skinned Elohim and white-skinned Ape Man, must have been white: it’s simple genetics. But that’s not what the Sumerian records tell us. They are categorical that Adam was black. Where did Adam’s blackness come from then?
If you carefully read the Sumerian accounts, they do not say Adam was created from the blood of the Elohim, the ruling Anunnaki who were white-skinned: they say, simply, that Adam was made from the blood partly of “an Anunnaki male”. We did underscore in one of the articles that not every Anunnaki was white-skinned; some were dark-skinned, the most notable example of whom were the Olmecs, who civilised Mesoamerica and much of Asia under the aegis of Ningishzidda, Enki’s genius son.
What emerges, folks, is that Adam was made from the blood of a black Anunnaki! It is this factor that “coloured” him, that made his skin tone dark and not Ape-Man, who was white skinned. This matter of fact triggers another curious question. Why did Enki opt for the blood of a black male Anunnaki to input into the creation of Adam?
BEST-FIT SKIN TONE FOR TROPICAL WEATHER
Blackness is the essence of mankind. All Earthlings of any hue must have an underlying blackness in them; otherwise they are bound to have Hell on Earth. They will be prone to all sorts of ailments, most notably skin cancers but including several physiological glitches. Blackness arises from the concentration of a pigment chemical known as melanin. Although it’s fundamentally black, it also occurs in brown.
Melanin has been described as “the chemical that makes life itself” and as “the biochemical substance that drives physical, mental, emotional and spiritual life” because it is not only about colouration: it performs a host of metabolically conducive functions in the body. When I did chemistry in high school, our Indian teacher, Mrs Nair, gave us a very fancy definition of chemistry which had to be committed to heart rather than understood. Yet chemistry has a very simple fundamental definition. It is simply the study of blackness.
The “chem” in chemistry is derived from the ancient Egyptian word Khem. Khem was what the original black Egyptians called themselves (The popular notion that it referred simply to the “rich black soils” of the Nile banks is a red herring). Chemistry is the study of Khem, the black melanin particles we call protons, neutrons, electrons and isolatons.
The building blocks of an atom folks are black in colour. A little known fact is that since 1946, scientists have held a yearly international conference designed to thoroughly evaluate the chemical melanin. What is curious is that no black scientist has ever been invited to a single one of these conferences.
Blacks carry a higher concentration of melanin because we’re the stem from which all of today’s four major races and 36 subdivisions sprang from. From a scale of 1 to 6, the following is how melanin is distributed among the major races of the world: Negroids, 6 (highest melanin content); Indians, Thais, Malaysians, Hispanics, and Aborigines, 5; Native Americans and Japanese, 4; Filipinos, Vietnamese, 3; Chinese, Koreans, 2; and Caucasians, 1.
Albinos of any race have zero melanin in them. As such, they are prone to premature aging, poor eye-sight and skin cancers, also known as melanomas. A study on albinism in Africa found that almost all albinos developed cancer in their 20s. In general, light-skinned people, particularly Caucasians, are more susceptible to melanomas than dark-skinned people. They are therefore best-suited to cooler climates since the harsh ultraviolet rays of tropical sunlight disposes them to developing melanoma. According to the Skin Cancer Foundation, black skin has a sun-protection factor of 13.4, whereas white skin has a mere 3.4.
In sum, black skin allows protection from ultraviolet rays and is therefore well-adapted to tropical climes. That is the reason Enki decided to create Adam from the blood of a black Anunnaki. Adam was the prototype of a worker race, the Lulu Amelu or the Ameluti, who were meant for backbreaking toil in the underground gold mines of Africa. As such, he had to be able to bear up to the relative glare of the Sun and be able to genetically fend off the dermatological (skin-related) hazards of the stifling tropical weather.
ONLY ENKI WAS PURE REPTILIAN
The prolific, highly illumining writer and public lecturer David Icke has one blanket term for the Anunnaki – Reptilians. Enki, Enlil, Ninmah, Marduk, etc: they are all Reptilians as far as he’s concerned. But he’s wrong. Although the Anunnaki, the Old Testament gods, emanated from the same planet, Nibiru, they were not of an identical genealogical lineage like we Earthlings, all of whom trace our origin to Adam and Eve, are. They were of two principal strains.
This, as we pointed out earlier in the series, was because Nibiru was actually a colony of beings who originally came from the Sirius and Orion star systems. Eons ago, Sirius was a male-dominated society inhabited by beings who evolved from a creature that was part-reptile, part-lion, and part-wolf, with the wolfen trait the most pronounced. On the other hand, Orion was a female-dominated society that was inhabited by beings who evolved from a serpentine creature.
At some stage, the two thrones merged into one powerful Sirian-Orion empire. In some ancient languages, the term Nibiru actually means “two races”. This clearly has to do with the merger of Sirius and Orion. The planet Nibiru was possibly the experimental melting pot for the two star races in our Solar System.
Now, of the three senior Anunnaki of Old Testament times, those who were originally Sirians were Ninmah and Enlil. Enlil and Ninmah were half-siblings, biological children of Anu, the erstwhile King of Sirius. Enki on the other hand was a son of Queen Ma, the erstwhile empress of Orion. Since Enki married a Sirian after the union and also had daughters with Ninmah, his children were part Sirian, part–Arian. Only Enki was pure Arian and only Enki was pure Reptilian. On balance though, every Anunnaki had a residual Reptilian component in him or her, with the Enkites more so than the Enlilites. There was a reptile, a wolf, and a lion in practically every Anunnaki in the post-union dispensation.
Beings, however, defined themselves by the most expressive trait. As such, the Enlilites identified themselves primarily as felines, particularly lions, despite being predominantly wolfen. That’s why the lion was the biblical symbol of the tribe of Judah, the forerunner to the Jewish race, who were Enlil’s “chosen people”.
Whilst the Enlilites, who held sway over Anunnaki affairs, valued the Enkites for their wisdom, intelligence, and razor-sharp intellect, they scorned them as “snakes in the grass” as a dig both at their evolutionary ancestry and their reluctance to toe the Enlilite line particularly in relation to keep mankind in a perpetually benighted state. Yet the Enkites were proud to call themselves serpents and to flaunt the cobra or python as their ubiquitous emblem as a genotype. That brings us back to Adam. Was he Reptilian, Feline, Wolfen, Primate, Serpentine or all of the above?
ADAM WAS 15 PERCENT REPTILIAN
Although as humans we arose from the ape species, we are only predominantly primate and not pure primate. What gives us away in this regard is our brain. Most people are not aware that we have three brains in one. First, there’s what is known as the R-Complex, with R standing for Reptilian. The R-Complex is the oldest part of the brain. It is an extension of the spinal cord and lies at the very centre of the brain. The R-Complex is typically found in snakes and all types of lizards.
Second, there is the limbic system, which wraps around the R-Complex. This is typically found in dogs and the cat family, a category that includes lions. Since the Anunnaki were essentially of Sirian descent, this must be the component of the brain that came from the Anunnaki (it is evolutionally younger than the R-Complex but order than the neo-cortex). Finally, there is the massive grey matter known as the neo-cortex. This is the main brain and amounts to about 85 percent of the human brain mass. It is the newest of the three, thus lending credence to assertions in cosmic history that wolves and cats predated apes. The neo-cortex encompasses the limbic system.
Where did humans get the R-Complex from? Was it written into our DNA by Enki, who perhaps desired that it predominates? Not at all. The R-Complex has a host of perverting influences on the human psyche and personality and therefore a benevolent Enki wouldn’t have wanted to integrate it into our brain.
The R-Complex derives from a prehistoric creature that provided the evolutionary link between dinosaurs and mammals. As such, it is not specific to reptiles: it is also found in all mammals. It follows, therefore, that it did not come from Anunnaki DNA: it came from Ape-Man. If Enki did any brain-related tweaking to Ape-Man’s DNA, this was to enlarge the neo-cortex. Indeed, our neo-cortex is 3.2 times larger than that of monkeys and chimpanzees.
Although humans are predominantly primate, they are 15 percent Reptilian owing to the presence of the R-Complex. Thus in Adam was the human component; the reptilian component; the feline component; and the wolfen component. He was a classical hybrid – a lulu. If the human component is primary in mankind, the Reptilian component is a distant second or third.
What obvious traits in humans reveal the reptile in us other than the presence of the R-Complex? Physically, our skin wrinkles: this is a Reptilian holdover. The “sh” sound to amongst other things call somebody to quietness is clearly a serpentine/reptilian sound. In terms of day-to-day conduct, at least five human behaviours are said to originate in the Reptilian brain. They are obsessive-compulsive behaviour; personal day-to-day rituals and superstitious acts; slavish conformance to old ways of doing things; ceremonial re-enactments; obeisance to precedent, as in legal, religious, cultural, and other matters; responding to partial representations (colouration, "strangeness," etc.), whether alive or inanimate; and all manner of deception.
That is not to say – and I must underline this – that Reptilians are inherently foul and evil. It is the oddball Reptilians, the rogue kind, who are impervious to positive reform and who are incapable of evolving spiritually who are. It is such types who ply the length and breadth of the universe to conquer, subjugate, enslave, and cannibalise and therefore are mistaken as the archetype for all Reptilian beings. Otherwise, some species of Reptilians are even much more kindly and soulful than humans.
The most immediate example are the Ebens of the Zeta Reticuli system (see Zeta Series), who evolved from a serpentine creature. And of course there is the inimitable Enki, another “serpent” who was the Anunnaki’s most devout champion of human welfare, progress, and enlightenment.
The past week or two has been a mixed grill of briefs in so far as the national employment picture is concerned. BDC just injected a further P64 million in Kromberg & Schubert, the automotive cable manufacturer and exporter, to help keep it afloat in the face of the COVID-19-engendered global economic apocalypse. The financial lifeline, which follows an earlier P36 million way back in 2017, hopefully guarantees the jobs of 2500, maybe for another year or two.
It was also reported that a bulb manufacturing company, which is two years old and is youth-led, is making waves in Selibe Phikwe. Called Bulb Word, it is the only bulb manufacturing operation in Botswana and employs 60 people. The figure is not insignificant in a town that had 5000 jobs offloaded in one fell swoop when BCL closed shop in 2016 under seemingly contrived circumstances, so that as I write, two or three buyers have submitted bids to acquire and exhume it from its stage-managed grave.
Youngest Maccabees scion Jonathan takes over after Judas and leads for 18 years
Going hand-in-glove with the politics at play in Judea in the countdown to the AD era, General Atiku, was the contention for the priesthood. You will be aware, General, that politics and religion among the Jews interlocked. If there wasn’t a formal and sovereign Jewish King, there of necessity had to be a High Priest at any given point in time.
Initially, every High Priest was from the tribe of Levi as per the stipulation of the Torah. At some stage, however, colonisers of Judah imposed their own hand-picked High Priests who were not ethnic Levites. One such High Priest was Menelaus of the tribe of Benjamin.
Parliament has rejected a motion by Leader of Opposition (LOO) calling for the reversing of the recent appointments of ruling party activists to various Land Boards across the country. The motion also called for the appointment of young and qualified Batswana with tertiary education qualifications.
The ruling party could not allow that motion to be adopted for many reasons discussed below. Why did the LOO table this motion? Why was it negated? Why are Land Boards so important that a ruling party felt compelled to deploy its functionaries to the leadership and membership positions?
Prior to the motion, there was a LOO parliamentary question on these appointments. The Speaker threw a spanner in the works by ruling that availing a list of applicants to determine who qualified and who didn’t would violate the rights of those citizens. This has completely obliterated oversight attempts by Parliament on the matter.
How can parliament ascertain the veracity of the claim without the names of applicants? The opposition seeks to challenge this decision in court. It would also be difficult in the future for Ministers and government officials to obey instructions by investigative Parliamentary Committees to summon evidence which include list of persons. It would be a bad precedent if the decision is not reviewed and set aside by the Business Advisory Committee or a Court of law.
Prior to independence, Dikgosi allocated land for residential and agricultural purposes. At independence, land tenures in Botswana became freehold, state land and tribal land. Before 1968, tribal land, which is land belonging to different tribes, dating back to pre-independence, was allocated and administered by Dikgosi under Customary Law. Dikgosi are currently merely ‘land overseers’, a responsibility that can be delegated. Land overseers assist the Land Boards by confirming the vacancy or availability for occupation of land applied for.
Post-independence, the country was managed through modern law and customary law, a system developed during colonialism. Land was allocated for agricultural purposes such as ploughing and grazing and most importantly for residential use. Over time some land was allocated for commercial purpose. In terms of the law, sinking of boreholes and development of wells was permitted and farmers had some rights over such developed water resources.
Land Boards were established under Section 3 of the Tribal Land Act of 1968 with the intention to improve tribal land administration. Whilst the law was enacted in 1968, Land Boards started operating around 1970 under the Ministry of Local Government and Lands which was renamed Ministry of Lands and Housing (MLH) in 1999. These statutory bodies were a mechanism to also prune the powers of Dikgosi over tribal land. Currently, land issues fall under the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services.
There are 12 Main Land Boards, namely Ngwato, Kgatleng, Tlokweng, Tati, Chobe, Tawana, Malete, Rolong, Ghanzi, Kgalagadi, Kweneng and Ngwaketse Land Boards. The Tribal Land Act of 1968 as amended in 1994 provides that the Land Boards have the powers to rescind the grant of any rights to use any land, impose restrictions on land usage and facilitate any transfer or change of use of land.
Some land administration powers have been decentralized to sub land boards. The devolved powers include inter alia common law and customary law water rights and land applications, mining, evictions and dispute resolution. However, decisions can be appealed to the land board or to the Minister who is at the apex.
So, land boards are very powerful entities in the country’s local government system. Membership to these institutions is important not only because of monetary benefits of allowances but also the power of these bodies. in terms of the law, candidates for appointment to Land Boards or Subs should be residents of the tribal areas where appointments are sought, be holders of at least Junior Certificate and not actively involved in politics. The LOO contended that ruling party activists have been appointed in the recent appointments.
He argued that worse, some had no minimum qualifications required by the law and that some are not inhabitants of the tribal or sub tribal areas where they have been appointed. It was also pointed that some people appointed are septuagenarians and that younger qualified Batswana with degrees have been rejected.
Other arguments raised by the opposition in general were that the development was not unusual. That the ruling party is used to politically motivated appointments in parastatals, civil service, diplomatic missions, specially elected councilors and Members of Parliament (MPs), Bogosi and Land Boards. Usually these positions are distributed as patronage to activists in return for their support and loyalty to the political leadership and the party.
The ruling party contended that when the Minister or the Ministry intervened and ultimately appointed the Land Boards Chairpersons, Deputies and members , he didn’t have information, as this was not information required in the application, on who was politically active and for that reason he could not have known who to not appoint on that basis. They also argued that opposition activists have been appointed to positions in the government.
The counter argument was that there was a reason for the legal requirement of exclusion of political activists and that the government ought to have mechanisms to detect those. The whole argument of “‘we didn’t know who was politically active” was frivolous. The fact is that ruling party activists have been appointed. The opposition also argued that erstwhile activists from their ranks have been recruited through positions and that a few who are serving in public offices have either been bought or hold insignificant positions which they qualified for anyway.
Whilst people should not be excluded from public positions because of their political activism, the ruling party cannot hide the fact that they have used public positions to reward activists. Exclusion of political activists may be a violation of fundamental human or constitutional rights. But, the packing of Land Boards with the ruling party activists is clear political corruption. It seeks to sow divisions in communities and administer land in a politically biased manner.
It should be expected that the ruling party officials applying for land or change of land usage etcetera will be greatly assisted. Since land is wealth, the ruling party seeks to secure resources for its members and leaders. The appointments served to reward 2019 election primary and general elections losers and other activists who have shown loyalty to the leadership and the party.
Running a country like this has divided it in a way that may be difficult to undo. The next government may decide to reset the whole system by replacing many of government agencies leadership and management in a way that is political. In fact, it would be compelled to do so to cleanse the system.
The opposition is also pondering on approaching the courts for review of the decision to appoint party functionaries and the general violation of clearly stated terms of reference. If this can be established with evidence, the courts can set aside the decision on the basis that unqualified people have been appointed.
The political activism aspect may also not be difficult to prove as some of these people are known activists who are in party structures, at least at the time of appointment, and some were recently candidates. There is a needed for civil society organizations such as trade unions and political parties to fight some of these decisions through peaceful protests and courts.