Choosing toothpaste can be confusing especially in the midst of all the advertisements of different brands that we get showered with every day. Walking down the dental care aisle in the supermarket, we're dazzled with "advanced formulas", "multi-action" pastes, "extreme-clean" products, "micro-cleaning crystals" and even "natural" toothpastes. A daily (actually, twice-daily) essential, toothpaste is an example of market segmentation at its most successful.
We get yet another dental advice from my dentist friend Dr Mahilo Kevin Mahilo of Smiles by Dr Mahilo in Maun. Asked if the choice of a toothpaste matters, this is what he had to say; “the right toothpaste is the one which is able to prevent gum pain, discoloured teeth, cavities and other more serious dental problems”.
But which ones can actually ensure these benefits are granted? Professor Mike Morgan, Head of Population Oral Health and Periodontics at HYPERLINK "http://www.dent.unimelb.edu.au/dsweb/about_school/commun_oh_perio.html" t "_blank" o "Periodontics" Melbourne University, has said in one of his articles, “most toothpastes contain essentially the same ingredients and believes very few in the marketplace would actually fail to perform these essential tasks”. Below is a breakdown of which toothpaste is right under what circumstances just so we can all keep this in mind next time we do out toiletry shopping.
If you have sensitive teeth or gums
Does eating ice cream or drinking hot drinks hurt your teeth? If your dentist has ruled out other problems like cavities or root infections, the issue could be that you have sensitive teeth. Sensitivity usually comes from weakened enamel from washing teeth too aggressively or being washed out by the recurrent acid reflux or an exposed tooth root and your dentist may therefore recommend using desensitizing toothpaste for a period of time like sensodyne. Of all the spin-off segments in the oral care market, toothpaste designed for sensitive teeth is the most legitimate, according to research.
When you get deposits on your teeth too easily
Tartar is the build-up of hardened plaque that can lead to gum disease. Although regular brushing and flossing can minimise its build-up, tartar can only be properly removed by a dentist. However, there are many toothpastes that contain tartar fighting elements that can prevent plaque from hardening. Look at the label for ingredients like pyrophosphates or zinc citrate. Some toothpastes are actually labelled 'tartar control'.
If you want whiter teeth
HYPERLINK "https://www.choice.com.au/health-and-body/dentists-and-dental-care/dental-products/articles/teeth-whitening-treatments" Teeth-whitening products are the largest segment in the oral care market. Though most of them are falsely marketed and do not contain a bleaching agent required to physically alter the colour of teeth, many of them can leave one with a sparkly and brighter smile. Some of these toothpastes contain baking soda and others peroxide to help lighten the colour of your teeth. Talk to your dentist about the best product for you. In-office whitening or bleaching that gives an immediate whiter smile is available in most dental offices.
If your teeth decay easily
At any point in time there is a sticky film of bacteria trying to form on your teeth. This film interacts with foods (sugars) to produce acids that eat away your enamel resulting in small cavities. The mineral fluoride in toothpastes strengthens and protects against decay and is recommended for adults and kids alike. Fluoride toothpastes not only prevent decay but remineralise teeth along the root surface.
There are toothpastes in the market that make toothbrushing an enjoyable experience for kids. With lots of good favours and colourful kid-friendly designs on the tube, you'll have your little one brushing his/her teeth in no time. But as children are prone to swallow toothpaste, the Australian Dental Association recommends parents avoid giving toothpaste to babies and toddlers up to 18 months and use only low-fluoride formulas for children 18 months to six years old to prevent fluorosis (caused by ingesting too much fluoride).
The American Dental Association recommends using rice sized smear for children less than three (3) years and pea sized for those three (3) to six (6) years old.
For comments of questions please email email@example.com
The past week or two has been a mixed grill of briefs in so far as the national employment picture is concerned. BDC just injected a further P64 million in Kromberg & Schubert, the automotive cable manufacturer and exporter, to help keep it afloat in the face of the COVID-19-engendered global economic apocalypse. The financial lifeline, which follows an earlier P36 million way back in 2017, hopefully guarantees the jobs of 2500, maybe for another year or two.
It was also reported that a bulb manufacturing company, which is two years old and is youth-led, is making waves in Selibe Phikwe. Called Bulb Word, it is the only bulb manufacturing operation in Botswana and employs 60 people. The figure is not insignificant in a town that had 5000 jobs offloaded in one fell swoop when BCL closed shop in 2016 under seemingly contrived circumstances, so that as I write, two or three buyers have submitted bids to acquire and exhume it from its stage-managed grave.
Youngest Maccabees scion Jonathan takes over after Judas and leads for 18 years
Going hand-in-glove with the politics at play in Judea in the countdown to the AD era, General Atiku, was the contention for the priesthood. You will be aware, General, that politics and religion among the Jews interlocked. If there wasn’t a formal and sovereign Jewish King, there of necessity had to be a High Priest at any given point in time.
Initially, every High Priest was from the tribe of Levi as per the stipulation of the Torah. At some stage, however, colonisers of Judah imposed their own hand-picked High Priests who were not ethnic Levites. One such High Priest was Menelaus of the tribe of Benjamin.
Parliament has rejected a motion by Leader of Opposition (LOO) calling for the reversing of the recent appointments of ruling party activists to various Land Boards across the country. The motion also called for the appointment of young and qualified Batswana with tertiary education qualifications.
The ruling party could not allow that motion to be adopted for many reasons discussed below. Why did the LOO table this motion? Why was it negated? Why are Land Boards so important that a ruling party felt compelled to deploy its functionaries to the leadership and membership positions?
Prior to the motion, there was a LOO parliamentary question on these appointments. The Speaker threw a spanner in the works by ruling that availing a list of applicants to determine who qualified and who didn’t would violate the rights of those citizens. This has completely obliterated oversight attempts by Parliament on the matter.
How can parliament ascertain the veracity of the claim without the names of applicants? The opposition seeks to challenge this decision in court. It would also be difficult in the future for Ministers and government officials to obey instructions by investigative Parliamentary Committees to summon evidence which include list of persons. It would be a bad precedent if the decision is not reviewed and set aside by the Business Advisory Committee or a Court of law.
Prior to independence, Dikgosi allocated land for residential and agricultural purposes. At independence, land tenures in Botswana became freehold, state land and tribal land. Before 1968, tribal land, which is land belonging to different tribes, dating back to pre-independence, was allocated and administered by Dikgosi under Customary Law. Dikgosi are currently merely ‘land overseers’, a responsibility that can be delegated. Land overseers assist the Land Boards by confirming the vacancy or availability for occupation of land applied for.
Post-independence, the country was managed through modern law and customary law, a system developed during colonialism. Land was allocated for agricultural purposes such as ploughing and grazing and most importantly for residential use. Over time some land was allocated for commercial purpose. In terms of the law, sinking of boreholes and development of wells was permitted and farmers had some rights over such developed water resources.
Land Boards were established under Section 3 of the Tribal Land Act of 1968 with the intention to improve tribal land administration. Whilst the law was enacted in 1968, Land Boards started operating around 1970 under the Ministry of Local Government and Lands which was renamed Ministry of Lands and Housing (MLH) in 1999. These statutory bodies were a mechanism to also prune the powers of Dikgosi over tribal land. Currently, land issues fall under the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services.
There are 12 Main Land Boards, namely Ngwato, Kgatleng, Tlokweng, Tati, Chobe, Tawana, Malete, Rolong, Ghanzi, Kgalagadi, Kweneng and Ngwaketse Land Boards. The Tribal Land Act of 1968 as amended in 1994 provides that the Land Boards have the powers to rescind the grant of any rights to use any land, impose restrictions on land usage and facilitate any transfer or change of use of land.
Some land administration powers have been decentralized to sub land boards. The devolved powers include inter alia common law and customary law water rights and land applications, mining, evictions and dispute resolution. However, decisions can be appealed to the land board or to the Minister who is at the apex.
So, land boards are very powerful entities in the country’s local government system. Membership to these institutions is important not only because of monetary benefits of allowances but also the power of these bodies. in terms of the law, candidates for appointment to Land Boards or Subs should be residents of the tribal areas where appointments are sought, be holders of at least Junior Certificate and not actively involved in politics. The LOO contended that ruling party activists have been appointed in the recent appointments.
He argued that worse, some had no minimum qualifications required by the law and that some are not inhabitants of the tribal or sub tribal areas where they have been appointed. It was also pointed that some people appointed are septuagenarians and that younger qualified Batswana with degrees have been rejected.
Other arguments raised by the opposition in general were that the development was not unusual. That the ruling party is used to politically motivated appointments in parastatals, civil service, diplomatic missions, specially elected councilors and Members of Parliament (MPs), Bogosi and Land Boards. Usually these positions are distributed as patronage to activists in return for their support and loyalty to the political leadership and the party.
The ruling party contended that when the Minister or the Ministry intervened and ultimately appointed the Land Boards Chairpersons, Deputies and members , he didn’t have information, as this was not information required in the application, on who was politically active and for that reason he could not have known who to not appoint on that basis. They also argued that opposition activists have been appointed to positions in the government.
The counter argument was that there was a reason for the legal requirement of exclusion of political activists and that the government ought to have mechanisms to detect those. The whole argument of “‘we didn’t know who was politically active” was frivolous. The fact is that ruling party activists have been appointed. The opposition also argued that erstwhile activists from their ranks have been recruited through positions and that a few who are serving in public offices have either been bought or hold insignificant positions which they qualified for anyway.
Whilst people should not be excluded from public positions because of their political activism, the ruling party cannot hide the fact that they have used public positions to reward activists. Exclusion of political activists may be a violation of fundamental human or constitutional rights. But, the packing of Land Boards with the ruling party activists is clear political corruption. It seeks to sow divisions in communities and administer land in a politically biased manner.
It should be expected that the ruling party officials applying for land or change of land usage etcetera will be greatly assisted. Since land is wealth, the ruling party seeks to secure resources for its members and leaders. The appointments served to reward 2019 election primary and general elections losers and other activists who have shown loyalty to the leadership and the party.
Running a country like this has divided it in a way that may be difficult to undo. The next government may decide to reset the whole system by replacing many of government agencies leadership and management in a way that is political. In fact, it would be compelled to do so to cleanse the system.
The opposition is also pondering on approaching the courts for review of the decision to appoint party functionaries and the general violation of clearly stated terms of reference. If this can be established with evidence, the courts can set aside the decision on the basis that unqualified people have been appointed.
The political activism aspect may also not be difficult to prove as some of these people are known activists who are in party structures, at least at the time of appointment, and some were recently candidates. There is a needed for civil society organizations such as trade unions and political parties to fight some of these decisions through peaceful protests and courts.