Connect with us
Advertisement

Enki Becomes A God!

Benson C Saili
THIS EARTH, MY BROTHER

In a stunning feat of genetic engineering, the Anunnaki’s greatest scientist of all time creates the first viable Earthling known as Adam

Having heard Enki’s pitch, Enlil demanded that he inspects the being he  was talking about. So to East Africa the five leaders flew and the Bit Shiimti, Enki’s R&D facility, they toured. Enki had, in addition to Ape-Man proper, kept the freak creatures he and his son had biologically engineered in the cages. Recognising Enki, the creatures began to bang their fists on the cage bars as if demanding something, most likely food. 

Enki told the entourage that he and Ningishzidda had already tested Ape-Man’s DNA and like the Anunnaki’s it was “entwined, like two serpents”.  But Enlil, like the puritan he was, was not impressed. He was in fact outraged.  Are you playing God Enki? he asked his step brother. We came here on Earth to mine gold, he was saying, not to concern ourselves with fashioning new life forms. Besides, the idea of creating a slave race was an abomination: slavery on Nibiru was abolished ages ago. “Tools are the slaves, not other beings,” Enlil emphasised.


Enki replied that it was not a slave he wanted to fashion; it was a helper. Enki’s position was supported by Ninmah and of course Ningishzidda. Ninmah said: “With wisdom and understanding has the Father of All Beginnings us endowed. To what purpose have we so been perfected if we cannot make utmost use of this capacity?” Ninurta, on the other hand, insisted that “let us with wisdom new tools fashion, not new beings create”.


It was a deadlock. Enlil decided the matter should be referred to King Anu on Nibiru. Receiving the message, King Anu was in one hell of a dilemma. Enki’s proposal that a new worker race be created via scientific means went against the grain: any attempts at artificially fashioning new sophisticated life forms Anu himself had forbidden both on Nibiru and future Anunnaki colonies. It was not up to creatures to play the Creator. When the Creator of All created life forms, surely it was not his intention that they too should assume his role at some stage. There had to be order in the universe: the laws of nature had to be upheld and adhered to through thick and thin.  


Following days of introspection, Anu decided to consult with his council of advisors. The Anunnaki, who too believed in the existence of a Supreme Being they called “The Creator of All” or “The Father of All Beginnings”, distinguished between Destiny and Fate. Both were part of God’s plan, they recognised, but whereas Fate was subject to change, Destiny wasn’t. So the question the council fundamentally addressed itself to was whether Enki’s idea was in line with God’s perfect and therefore unalterable will (Destiny) or fell under his permissive and therefore flexible will (Fate).   “Long and bitter the discussions were, of Life and Death, Fate and Destiny,” records Enki in his memoirs.

“Is it (the proposed fashioning of new life) from the Beginning ordained, or by us for choosing?” Following days of back-and-forth deliberation, the consensus was that “Survival (on Nibiru) is in danger! If gold must be obtained, let the Being be fashioned! Let Anu forsake the rules of planetary journeys, let Nibiru be saved!”  Enki was ecstatic but Enlil was indignant as usual. Reluctantly, Enlil got Ennugi, the mining superintendent, to relay Anu’s decision to his charges. The miners were not that disappointed: though the creation of a worker race could take hundreds of years in Earth time, it would not take more than a year in Nibiru time, which was their work timetable. They could therefore afford to bide their time given Enki’s “blessed assurance”.  

ANUNNAKI CROWN LAYS DOWN CONDITIONS FOR ENKI

The triumvirate of Enki, his genius son Ningishzidda, and his step-sister Ninmah, along with some rank-and-file Anunnaki assistants, cloistered themselves in the Bit Shiimti and there set to work.  They were to practically work round the clock till they had produced the object of their labours – a “helper” as per Enki’s take. Now, in fashioning the Lulu Amelu, Enki was not going to have his way. He had been given strict terms by which to inviolably adhere by both King Anu, his step father, and Queen Antu, his biological mother, the former Queen of Orion.


First, the Lulu Amelu was to be made substantially beneath the Anunnaki intellectually. Enki was told it was not an equal he had been sanctioned to create: it was simply a slightly improved version of the primitive Ape Man. The Lulu Amelu should simply be capable of obeying orders and carrying out instructions and not to reason the way the Anunnaki did and possibly entertain insurrectionist ideas.


Secondly, the Lulu Amelu was to be much smaller in stature than Ape Man and much smaller than the Anunnaki themselves. Enki wasn’t to create a creature that would pose a physical threat to the Anunnaki in any way, shape or form.
Third, the Lulu Amelu   shouldn’t be capable of reproducing itself. It should be mass produced in the laboratory using artificial means and not innately carry the capacity to perpetuate itself through the process of heterosexual fertilisation. In other words, the sexual urge should be dampened considerably.


Fourth, up to 99 percent of the Lulu Amelu’s DNA should be erased so that it was not capable of feats and leaps of ability both at the physical and metaphysical level matching those of the Anunnaki. Fifthly, Queen Antu insisted that the brain stem of the    Lulu Amelu should be Arian, that is, of predominantly Orion DNA, which was significant as we shall explicate at a later stage.


Finally, King Anu insisted that the brain of the Lulu Amelu should be rigged with certain organic structures that would render it vulnerable to corrective manipulation.  Enki was not exactly amenable to the conditions imposed upon him yet he had no choice but to simply play ball. Enki called the undertaking Project Adama. Adama can also be rendered as Atamo or Mo-ata in that in olden languages, terms could be reversed without changing the meaning.  It has two interconnected meanings basically. The first is “He of Earth”, or simply Earthling. The second is “Progenitor” or “Multiplier”, that is, he who will give rise to countless others of his kind.  

PROJECT ADAMA’S  LITANY OF FAILURES

Would Project Adama succeed?
The chances were it could. Enki and Ningishzidda had on their own come so close yet so far. They had, after mixing genes of various animal species,   come up with all sorts of creatures such as centaurs (part human, part horse), griffins (body of lion but with head and wings of an eagle), and minotaurs  (head of a bull, body of a man). This time around, Enki wanted to try something revolutionary, which would be wholly focused on Ape-Man, or Homo Erectus, the creature that within a few million years'  time was to evolve, so Enki reckoned, into Homo Sapiens like the Anunnaki were.  

Enki had decided that for the sake of the toiling Anunnaki, this evolutionary process be fast-tracked, so that Earthly Homo Sapiens emerges now rather than in the unforeseeable future.  In other words, Enki had decided to intervene in the natural evolutionary process.
The first thing Enki and his team attempted to do was to artificially inseminate Ape-Woman in a bid to get her  to conceive.

They implanted a Test Tube-fertilised egg (a mixture of Anunnaki sperm and Homo Erectus ovum)   into the creature’s womb. In so doing, Enki made sure (at the insistence of Enlil) that the Anunnaki gene was substantially tweaked – in a process we today call gene splicing – so that the Anunnaki component in the ensuing hybrid creature was minimal though sufficient for the purpose. 

The Anunnaki as pointed out above did not intend to create an equal: they wanted a reasonable but considerably inferior being.  After several attempts at gene modifications, along with a series of miscarriages, Ape-Woman finally started conceiving. However, all pregnancies went indefinitely beyond term, forcing chief midwife Ninmah to perform caesarian sections. Moreover, all offspring were males and all were, if not stillborn,   badly deformed from the womb – deaf, dumb, blind, crippled, and worse. At long last, there was what seemed to be a breakthrough when an apparently able-bodied offspring was delivered, it too by caesarian section.  

 
“In desperation, Ninmah a cutting made, that which was conceived with tongs she drew out,” recalls Enki. “A living Being it was!… Shaggy with hair all over was the newborn, his foreparts like of the Earth creatures were. His hindparts to those of the Anunnaki more akin they were…” But disappointment  soon  set in. “Taller the Earth child grew, in the image of the Anunnaki he was not. His hands for tools were not suited, his speech only grunting sounds was! We must try once small, Ninmah was saying. The admixture needs adjusting.”


Enki agreed and once again Ninmah proceeded with the gene tinkering under the supervision of Enki. “One bit she took from one (the Anunnaki gene), one bit she took from another (the Home Erectus gene).” The results were no better: in one case, the offspring “his senses they tested, they found them deficient. The Earth child could not hear, his eyesight was faltered.”   In other cases, “his semen was dripping … One had hands too short to reach the mouth, one had lungs for breathing unsuited.”
Enki was saddened by this concatenation of failures year upon year. Meanwhile, the labouring  Anunnaki were relentless in their badgering of Enki. “How far are you Lord Professor?” was the one, monotonous question Enki kept fielding day in, day out.     

NINMAH OFFERS HERSELF AS AN INCUBATOR

Now desperate but still resolved, Project Adama Leader Enki opined that maybe the reason  Ape-Woman’s offspring were failing was because the container – the Test Tube – in which the zygote was grown before being inserted into her womb was not made of appropriate and compatible material. The Test Tube was made of “Nibiru crystals”. So Enki suggested that a new “purifying bath” be made out of Earthly clay rich in copper and gold. Ninmah accordingly moulded such a vessel.

The improvement was significant but the  results were not dramatically different; the offspring still fell far short of a fully-functional Being. Then an idea struck Enki. Thus far, they had been using Ape-Woman as a surrogate mother. Why not try an Anunnaki surrogate? In other words, why not let an Anunnaki female carry the pregnancy instead of Ape-Woman?


Enki’s suggestion was hotly debated by the Bit  Shiimti  team. As Ninmah put it, the odds that a normal being or a monster would result were fifty-fifty. Just who would be the Anunnaki woman to take such a risk? The selfless Enki, since he did not want to endanger anybody else’s life, offered his wife Ninki. But Ninmah, having thought the matter over, volunteered herself instead.  “The admixtures by me were made,” she said. “Reward and endangerment should be mine! I shall be the one the Anunnaki womb to provide, for good or evil fate to face.” Enki impassionedly embraced his step-sister as a tribute to her sacrificial gesture.


The die was now cast. Enki now addressed the Bit Shiimti team officially and for the record thus: “We have with us Ninmah, who we will now call BELET-ILI, a birth-giving goddess. Let her fashion a LULU. Let an AMELU bear the toil of the gods! Let her create a LULU AMELU. Let him bear the yoke!” Put differently, Enki was formally lending his blessings to the creation of a Lulu – a mixed one, or hybrid – for utilising as an Amelu – a workman – to take over the Anunnaki’s gold-mining toil, using Ninmah as the surrogate mother. If anything went amiss, such as Ninmah dying, for instance, he was prepared to face the wrath of both Anu and Enlil, who were kept in the dark about this turn of events.

“MY HANDS HAVE MADE IT!”

Let  us at this juncture turn to the Bible. Why did “God” decide to create mankind? The answer is found in GENESIS 2:5 – there was no man to work the ground. It is crystal-clear: “God” created mankind primarily as a worker. Obviously, this selfish “God” could not have been the God Jesus introduced to us in the 1st century. It turns out this “God” was actually Enki! The term “God” in Genesis is used sometimes as a plural (ELOHIM in the original Hebrew) and sometimes as a singular. As a plural,  it refers to the Anunnaki leadership; as a singular, it generally refers to Enlil though it at times refers, as in the present case, to Enki and other leading Anunnaki figures.

  As we  keep reiterating, Genesis was written in the 6th century BC by the Levites whilst they were  in captivity in Babylon. It was in Babylon that they came across accounts of Earth’s beginnings inscribed on thousands of clay  tablets that were at least 2500 years old. The inscriptions were done by the Sumerians, the world’s best  known civilisation of old.


The process by which Enki set about fashioning mankind proceeded thus: the TE’EMA, that is, genetic DNA,  was obtained from the blood of  a volunteer “young” Anunnaki male. This Te’ema was injected into the TI-IT, that is the ovum, of Ape-Woman and the mixture was retained in a Test Tube made of clay rich in copper and gold before finally being implanted into Ninmah’s womb – a  procedure we today call cloning!   Although there was clay involved in this mixture, the Bible throws up the notion that man was actually made from clay, or “the dust of the ground”. Once again, the Genesis authors got it wrong. They employed the Akkadian word TIT, Akkadian being the father of the Hebrew language. TIT of course means clay, but the original Sumerian records used the term TI-IT, which means “That Which Is With Life,” or simply reproductive cell!


Ninmah’s pregnancy lasted nine Earth months, not nine Nibiru months (a Nibiru month lasts 360 Earth years). In other words, the gestation period ran according to Earth’s natural cycles, not Nibiru’s. Ninmah was naturally  delivered and the offspring was a baby boy! There were clear-cut signs that the newborn was viable. Says  The Lost Book of Enki: “Enki the boy child held in his hands; the image of perfection he was. He slapped the newborn on his hindparts; the newborn uttered proper sounds (cried)!  He handed the newborn to Ninmah; she held him up in  her hands. My hands have made it! victoriously she shouted!”


Project Adama had borne results:   Adam, Earth’s first viable Test Tube Baby, was born. Enki had become a God!   GENESIS 2:7 says, “The Lord God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and the man became a living being”. The misconception of “dust” we have already unravelled above. As for the “breath of life”, this was simply a mix-up with the place Adam was created in. He was created in the Bit Shiimti, which means “Place Where The Wind of Life is Blown In”, or simply “A Man-Making Factory”. As we have seen, this was Enki’s organic Research & Development  facility in East Africa.


The evolutionists have been right all along: Africa is the cradle of mankind.

NEXT WEEK: ANOTHER “LULU” COMES INTO BEING
 

Continue Reading

Columns

Is COVID-19 Flogging an Already Dead Economic Horse?

9th September 2020

The Central Bank has by way of its Monetary Policy Statement informed us that the Botswana economy is likely to contract by 8.9 percent over the course of the year 2020.

The IMF paints an even gloomier picture – a shrinkage of the order of 9.6 percent.  That translates to just under $2 billion hived off from the overall economic yield given our average GDP of roughly $18 billion a year. In Pula terms, this is about P23 billion less goods and services produced in the country and you and I have a good guess as to what such a sum can do in terms of job creation and sustainability, boosting tax revenue, succouring both recurrent and development expenditure, and on the whole keeping our teeny-weeny economy in relatively good nick.

This content is locked

Login To Unlock The Content!

Continue Reading

Columns

Union of Blue Bloods

9th September 2020

Joseph’s and Judah’s family lines conjoin to produce lineal seed

Just to recap, General Atiku, the Israelites were not headed for uncharted territory. The Promised Land teemed with Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites. These nations were not simply going to cut and run when they saw columns of battle-ready Israelites approach: they were going to fight to the death.

This content is locked

Login To Unlock The Content!

Continue Reading

Columns

Security Sector Private Bills: What are they about?

9th September 2020

Parliament has begun debates on three related Private Members Bills on the conditions of service of members of the Security Sector.

The Bills are Prisons (Amendment) Bill, 2019, Police (Amendment) Bill, 2019 and Botswana Defence Force (Amendment) Bill, 2019. The Bills seek to amend the three statutes so that officers are placed on full salaries when on interdictions or suspensions whilst facing disciplinary boards or courts of law.

In terms of the Public Service Act, 2008 which took effect in 2010, civil servants who are indicted are paid full salary and not a portion of their emolument. Section 35(3) of the Act specifically provides that “An employee’s salary shall not be withheld during the period of his or her suspension”.

However, when parliament reformed the public service law to allow civil servants to unionize, among other things, and extended the said protection of their salaries, the process was not completed. When the House conferred the benefit on civil servants, members of the disciplined forces were left out by not accordingly amending the laws regulating their employment.

The Bills stated above seeks to ask Parliament to also include members of the forces on the said benefit. It is unfair not to include soldiers or military officers, police officers and prison waders in the benefit. Paying an officer who is facing either external or internal charges full pay is in line with the notion of ei incumbit probation qui dicit, non qui negat or the presumption of innocence; that the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies.

The officers facing charges, either internal disciplinary or criminal charges before the courts, must be presumed innocent until proven otherwise. Paying them a portion of their salary is penalty and therefore arbitrary. Punishment by way of loss of income or anything should come as a result of a finding on the guilt by a competent court of law, tribunal or disciplinary board.

What was the rationale behind this reform in 2008 when the Public Service Act was adopted? First it was the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.

The presumption of innocence is the legal principle that one is considered “innocent until proven guilty”. In terms of the constitution and other laws of Botswana, the presumption of innocence is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, and it is an international human right under the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11.

Withholding a civil servant’s salary because they are accused of an internal disciplinary offense or a criminal offense in the courts of law, was seen as punishment before a decision by a tribunal, disciplinary board or a court of law actually finds someone culpable. Parliament in its wisdom decided that no one deserves this premature punishment.

Secondly, it was considered that people’s lives got destroyed by withholding of financial benefits during internal or judicial trials. Protection of wages is very important for any worker. Workers commit their salaries, they pay mortgages, car loans, insurances, schools fees for children and other things. When public servants were experiencing salary cuts because of interdictions, they lost their homes, cars and their children’s future.

They plummeted into instant destitution. People lost their livelihoods. Families crumbled. What was disheartening was that in many cases, these workers are ultimately exonerated by the courts or disciplinary tribunals. When they are cleared, the harm suffered is usually irreparable. Even if one is reimbursed all their dues, it is difficult to almost impossible to get one’s life back to normal.

There is a reasoning that members of the security sector should be held to very high standards of discipline and moral compass. This is true. However, other more senior public servants such as judges, permanent secretary to the President and ministers have faced suspensions, interdictions and or criminal charges in the courts but were placed on full salaries.

The yardstick against which security sector officers are held cannot be higher than the aforementioned public officials. It just wouldn’t make sense. They are in charge of the security and operate in a very sensitive area, but cannot in anyway be held to higher standards that prosecutors, magistrates, judges, ministers and even senior officials such as permanent secretaries.

Moreover, jail guards, police officers and soldiers, have unique harsh punishments which deter many of them from committing misdemeanors and serious crimes. So, the argument that if the suspension or interdiction with full pay is introduced it would open floodgates of lawlessness is illogical.

Security Sector members work in very difficult conditions. Sometimes this drives them into depression and other emotional conditions. The truth is that many seldom receive proper and adequate counseling or such related therapies. They see horrifying scenes whilst on duty. Jail guards double as hangmen/women.

Detectives attend to autopsies on cases they are dealing with. Traffic police officers are usually the first at accident scenes. Soldiers fight and kill poachers. In all these cases, their minds are troubled. They are human. These conditions also play a part in their behaviors. They are actually more deserving to be paid full salaries when they’re facing allegations of misconduct.

To withhold up to 50 percent of the police, prison workers and the military officers’ salaries during their interdiction or suspensions from work is punitive, insensitive and prejudicial as we do not do the same for other employees employed by the government.

The rest enjoy their full salaries when they are at home and it is for a good reason as no one should be made to suffer before being found blameworthy. The ruling party seems to have taken a position to negate the Bills and the collective opposition argue in the affirmative. The debate have just began and will continue next week Thursday, a day designated for Private Bills.

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!