Connect with us
Advertisement

Man, The Evolutionary Enigma

Benson C Saili
THIS EARTH, MY BROTHER

 

… but Genesis and Darwin do agree rather than conflict

We are called human beings, mankind, earthlings, or simply man.  We’re earthlings because we’re native to planet Earth: we evolved here. However, we’re not pure earthlings. We’re a hybrid race, or LULUs in Sumerian language.  We’re part extraterrestrial, part  ape. The extraterrestrial component arises from the fact that we have Anunnaki blood in us. There’s Sirian (of Sirius), Aryan (of Orion), and Reptilian (of Draco) blood in us – Alien DNA. There are smaller traces of other  ET races in our DNA still.  

We’re a hybrid race because the Anunnaki tampered with us. If  they hadn’t, we would still be pure earthlings but primitive ones, albeit fully content with our way of  life. We would still be Ape Man. You may not be aware of this, but  zoologically, mankind is  classified as ape. We belong to the same family (called a genus) as gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees, and gibbons. These are tailless primates. Primates with tails include monkeys and baboons – it’s a broad family we belong too folks.  

In the ape family, the closest to  mankind is the chimpanzee. Genetically, the difference between mankind and  the chimpanzee is only 2 percent.  This is because mankind and chimpanzees are descended from the same hominid ancestor, making the chimpanzee our most immediate cousin. The chimpanzee is still a chimpanzee because it hasn’t been genetically tampered with by biomedically advanced ETs such as the Anunnaki. In our case, we were genetically tinkered with  at some stage in the course of our evolution.  

At the time we were genetically manipulated by the Anunnaki, we had reached an evolutionary stage we today call Homo Erectus.   Homo Erectus was a hominid that walked in an erect posture, was able to make fire, and fashion primitive tools from stones. His body was hairy but his facial features were closer to what we look today than they were to apes. Then 300,000 years ago, the Anunnaki created Adam and Eve, the first Homo Sapiens.   

How does the creation of Adam and Eve by the Anunnaki, a topic we shall address exhaustively sooner than later, exactly reconcile with biomedical science and the theory of evolution? Is the Biblical take really in agreement, if at all, with these fields
of inquiry?

First, some clarity. When I say the  Anunnaki created mankind, I use a conventional figure of speech, something that most of our readership will have realised by now. The Anunnaki, or to be more specific, Enki, did not create Adam and Eve per se; he fashioned them out of already existing matter in Ape-Woman, or Homo Erectus, and the Anunnaki themselves.  Ape-Woman eggs were infused with Anunnaki genes – a genetic engineering technique best known as cloning – to yield Adam and Eve some 300,000 years ago.  How do we know Adam and Eve appeared on the scene 300,000 years ago and in the era of Homo Erectus?

THE MISSING LINK

In 1859, the famed naturalist Charles Darwin published a seminal book titled On the Origins of Species in which he put forward what has become known as the theory of evolution. According to this theory, all living things evolved from lower forms, such as an amoeba, to a higher form, such as an ape, by a process known as natural selection. 

Natural selection can be explained thus:  because of the rigours (trials and tribulations) of existence inherent in the natural environment, those organisms that are able to cope survive (that is nature gives them a “pass”), whilst those unable to cope die off (that is nature gives them a “fail”). As the capable organism forges through existence, it evolves into a more sophisticated species. This evolution does not take place in jumps; it is so glacially and imperceptibly slow it takes many millions of years.

What is the most obvious evidence that man is a product of evolution? It is the way we develop when we are in the womb. Any evolutionary biologist will tell you that at some stage of its development, the human embryo is no different from that of a bird,  reptile, or any other mammal. At one point, it even has gills, like a fish. In other words, the human embryo developing in the womb passes through stages of its evolutionary ancestry.

One profile of  the development of  the human embryo I read in a biology encylopaedia says at 5 weeks, the embryo has “a distinctly reptilian aspect … The embryo still has a tail and cannot be distinguished from pig, rabbit, elephant, or chick embryo”. At 7 weeks, “the face is mammalian but somewhat pig-like”. It is only when it is ten weeks old that the human embryo is distinctly human.

Man’s intra-uterine cycle was one of the major clues that gave Darwin and his co-discoverer Alf Wallace the idea that we are creatures of evolution. But Wallace was more matter-of-fact: he stated that some intelligent power has guided or determined the development of man. Why did he say that? As stated above, mankind belongs to a animal category known as hominids or primates. This category includes chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, baboons, gibbons, and your ordinary monkey. Evolutionists say hominids had a common ancestor eons ago.

Man’s closest cousin is the chimpanzee. A type of chimpanzee called the bonobos is remarkably human-like in character: for instance, it also copulates face to face. Mankind and chimpanzees   share a common, relatively recent ancestor, from which they split 6 million years ago Indeed genetically, the difference between mankind and a chimpanzee as asserted above is only 2 percent. Mankind came through the line of Homo Erectus, or Ape-Man, who appeared on the scene around 2  million years ago.  

For Homo Erectus to evolve into modern man, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, he should by rights have taken millions of years. The biologist Thomas Huxley says, “Large changes (in species) occur over tens of millions of years, while really major ones (macro changes) take a hundred million years or so”.  Yet Homo Erectus, for reasons that baffled Darwin and Wallace, disappeared a mere 2 million years after emerging, which in evolutional terms is overnight. The moment Homo Erectus vanished, that is, 300,000 years ago, Homo Sapiens suddenly emerged, as if by magic!

Over a hundred years since Darwin’s day, scientists remained puzzled by this anomaly. In 1984, anthropologist Roger Lewin said, “The origin of  modern humans denoted by the subspecies Homo Sapiens remains one of the great puzzles of palaeoanthropology (the study of ancient humans as found in fossil hominids)”.  In 1995, The Sunday Times of London reported that “scientists themselves are confused”. In regard to mankind’s Ape-like ancestors, the highly respected paper said, “Their relationships to one another remain clouded in mystery and nobody has conclusively identified any of them as the early hominid that gave rise to Homo   Sapiens”. In other words, even Homo Erectus does not exactly qualify as mankind’s undisputed ancestor.

Both scientists and evolutionists are at a loss as to why mankind, or Adam in the Hebrew language, defied the pace of nature and evolved basically in the twinkling of an eye from his hominid ancestor. And there is more. Why did we become intelligent whilst our nearest cousin, the chimpanzee, did not? Why have chimpanzees remained in evolutionary stagnation for 6 million years when we have woven clothes, built cities, and flown to the moon? Why is our brain size 50 percent larger than that of the chimpanzee?

In 1911, Arthur Keith, an anthropologist, investigated the peculiar characteristics that made a particular primate different from the rest.  The distinctive characteristics were as follows: gorilla 75; chimpanzee 109; orangutan 113; gibbon 116; and man 312. In other words, mankind was about three times more unique than any other primate. Why did we make such a leap? How did we attain such a level of sophistication not by degrees but practically in a flash in evolutional terms?

Still another jigsaw is this: apes are five to ten times stronger than humans. Where did our strength go? Why did we lose so much strength when it was vital to our survival? We are indeed a “revolutionary misfit” courtesy of another Earth Chronicles researcher Alan Alford.

The absence of a definite and necessary intermediate species between Homo Erectus and mankind evolutionists call the Missing Link.

THE SITCHIN TAKE

Whilst scientists and evolutionists remained staggered by the mystery of the Missing Link, it was left to independent researchers to plug  the gap. In 1976, Zechariah Sitchin wrote the iconic book, The 12th Planet, in which he sought to enlighten the world on the fact  that in addition to the known 9 planets plus the Sun and Moon, there was a 12th eminent celestial body, a tenth planet known as Nibiru. Nibiru, which is seen by Earthlings only once in 3600 years, is the “Heaven” of the Bible, the abode of Old Testament “gods” – Jehovah/Yahweh and the like.

These gods were not supernatural beings but humanoids –  flesh-and-blood creatures like we are, only they were more advanced technologically.  It were these “gods”, or Anunnaki as they were best known in antiquity, who 450,000 years ago came to Earth in their spaceships and 144,000 years later created mankind as a worker race. They needed a worker race to help mine gold, a commodity that was needed to plug the gaping ozone hole on their planet. The Anunnaki did not create mankind from without: they employed genetic engineering to fuse their own genes with those  of Homo Erectus to give rise to  a reasoning species they called the Adam.     

Sitchin researched for thirty years, primarily from thousands of clay tablets and cylinder seals on which the Sumerians, the world’s best known civilisation of old, 6,000 years ago recorded mankind’s origins and other momentous events before he put pen to paper.  But the Illuminati, the diabolical forces who rule the world from behind the scenes, had known about Nibiru and the Anunnaki since days immemorial, a knowledge they had kept  inviolably secret though they did give hints of it through symbols, signage, movies, and rituals.     
     
SCIENCE VINDICATES SITCHIN

In The 12th Planet, Sitchin wrote thus:  “Man is the product of evolution; but modern Man, Homo Sapiens, is the product of the ‘gods’. For  some time circa 300,000 years ago, the Nephilim took ape-man (Homo Erectus) and implanted on him their own image and likeness.”

By “gods”,  Sitchin meant the Anunnaki, whose royal ranks were known as the Nephilim. By “man”, he meant the two species that sprang from Homo Erectus: these were Neanderthal Man and Cro-Magnon Man, the latter of whom advanced into modern man. Whereas Neanderthal Man became extinct 30,000 years ago,  Cro-Magnon  man persevered.

On February 13, 2009, the highly respected journal Science reported that German  scientists had deciphered the genome of a female Neanderthal fossil  in a project that sought to establish when Neanderthal Man, the “failed species of humans”, separated from modern man. The New York Times reported that “the new findings document two important sets of genetic changes – those that occurred between 5.7 million years ago, when the human line split from the line leading to chimpanzees, and 300,000 years ago when Neanderthals and the ancestors of modern humans (that is, Cro-Magnon Man) parted ways”.  

Thus Sitchin’s reckoning, from the Sumerian tablets, that Adam came onto the scene 300,000 years ago was now scientifically corroborated.  But scientists still could not hazard a guess as to how modern man emerged and so suddenly at that. They should have listened to the Sumerians, who inform us  that it were the Anunnaki who jumped the gun on the evolutionary process and brought mankind into existence millions of years ahead of schedule through genetic engineering.  Neanderthal Man was the remnant of Homo Erectus who was not further  upgraded genetically by the Anunnaki.

In all his books, Sitchin makes the case that the Anunnaki came to Earth to look for gold because on their planet, Nibiru, they faced a very acute problem of a dwindling atmosphere brought about by natural causes and nuclear wars. To overcome this problem, Sitchin says, they needed to create a shield of gold particles in their upper atmosphere, which gold was extremely rare on Nibiru but abundant on Earth.

At an international conference held in Germany in May 2009, White House Science Advisor John Holdern punted “Geo-Engineering”, already under discussion by the US government as he spoke,  as a future answer to the problem of global warming.  He said using space technology yet to be devised, “particles will be shot into the Earth's upper atmosphere to create a shield that will reflect away from Earth the Sun's warming rays”. Holdern did not specify the nature of these “particles”, but as an Illuminati scientist, he was obviously aware that the Anunnaki had successfully tried the method on their planet using gold particles.

Reading of this development, Sitchin gleefully gushed thus: “Modern science is only catching up with ancient knowledge. The idea of 'geo-engineering' is borrowed from technologies of the Anunnaki.”    

How true!
 
NEXT WEEK: DNA’S EXTRATERRESTRIAL ORIGIN

Continue Reading

Columns

Export Processing Zones: How to Get SEZA to Sizzle

23rd September 2020
Export Processing Zone (EPZ) factory in Kenya

In 2005, the Business & Economic Advisory Council (BEAC) pitched the idea of the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) to the Mogae Administration.

It took five years before the SEZ policy was formulated, another five years before the relevant law was enacted, and a full three years before the Special Economic Zones Authority (SEZA) became operational.

This content is locked

Login To Unlock The Content!

 

Continue Reading

Columns

Egypt Bagged Again

23rd September 2020
Samson

… courtesy of infiltration stratagem by Jehovah-Enlil’s clan

With the passing of Joshua’s generation, General Atiku, the promised peace and prosperity of a land flowing with milk and honey disappeared, giving way to chaos and confusion.

Maybe Joshua himself was to blame for this shambolic state of affairs. He had failed to mentor a successor in the manner Moses had mentored him. He had left the nation without a central government or a human head of state but as a confederacy of twelve independent tribes without any unifying force except their Anunnaki gods.

This content is locked

Login To Unlock The Content!

 

Continue Reading

Columns

‘RO, ‘RO ‘RO YOUR ‘BOT

23rd September 2020

If I say the word ‘robot’ to you,  I can guess what would immediately spring to mind –  a cute little Android or animal-like creature with human or pet animal characteristics and a ‘heart’, that is to say to say a battery, of gold, the sort we’ve all seen in various movies and  tv shows.  Think R2D2 or 3CPO in Star Wars, Wall-E in the movie of the same name,  Sonny in I Robot, loveable rogue Bender in Futurama,  Johnny 5 in Short Circuit…

Of course there are the evil ones too, the sort that want to rise up and eliminate us  inferior humans – Roy Batty in Blade Runner, Schwarzenegger’s T-800 in The Terminator,  Box in Logan’s Run,  Police robots in Elysium and  Otomo in Robocop.

And that’s to name but a few.  As a general rule of thumb, the closer the robot is to human form, the more dangerous it is and of course the ultimate threat in any Sci-Fi movie is that the robots will turn the tables and become the masters, not the mechanical slaves.  And whilst we are in reality a long way from robotic domination, there are an increasing number of examples of  robotics in the workplace.

ROBOT BLOODHOUNDS Sometimes by the time that one of us smells something the damage has already begun – the smell of burning rubber or even worse, the smell of deadly gas. Thank goodness for a robot capable of quickly detecting and analyzing a smell from our very own footprint.

A*Library Bot The A*Star (Singapore) developed library bot which when books are equipped with RFID location chips, can scan shelves quickly seeking out-of-place titles.  It manoeuvres with ease around corners, enhances the sorting and searching of books, and can self-navigate the library facility during non-open hours.

DRUG-COMPOUNDING ROBOT Automated medicine distribution system, connected to the hospital prescription system. It’s goal? To manipulate a large variety of objects (i.e.: drug vials, syringes, and IV bags) normally used in the manual process of drugs compounding to facilitate stronger standardisation, create higher levels of patient safety, and lower the risk of hospital staff exposed to toxic substances.

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY ROBOTS Applications include screw-driving, assembling, painting, trimming/cutting, pouring hazardous substances, labelling, welding, handling, quality control applications as well as tasks that require extreme precision,

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS Ecrobotix, a Swiss technology firm has a solar-controlled ‘bot that not only can identify weeds but thereafter can treat them. Naio Technologies based in southwestern France has developed a robot with the ability to weed, hoe, and assist during harvesting. Energid Technologies has developed a citrus picking system that retrieves one piece of fruit every 2-3 seconds and Spain-based Agrobot has taken the treachery out of strawberry picking. Meanwhile, Blue River Technology has developed the LettuceBot2 that attaches itself to a tractor to thin out lettuce fields as well as prevent herbicide-resistant weeds. And that’s only scratching the finely-tilled soil.

INDUSTRIAL FLOOR SCRUBBERS The Global Automatic Floor Scrubber Machine boasts a 1.6HP motor that offers 113″ water lift, 180 RPM and a coverage rate of 17,000 sq. ft. per hour

These examples all come from the aptly-named site www.willrobotstakemyjob.com    because while these functions are labour-saving and ripe for automation, the increasing use of artificial intelligence in the workplace will undoubtedly lead to increasing reliance on machines and a resulting swathe of human redundancies in a broad spectrum of industries and services.

This process has been greatly boosted by the global pandemic due to a combination of a workforce on furlough, whether by decree or by choice, and the obvious advantages of using virus-free machines – I don’t think computer viruses count!  For example, it was suggested recently that their use might have a beneficial effect in care homes for the elderly, solving short staffing issues and cheering up the old folks with the novelty of having their tea, coffee and medicines delivered by glorified model cars.  It’s a theory, at any rate.

Already, customers at the South-Korean  fast-food chain No Brand Burger can avoid any interaction with a human server during the pandemic.  The chain is using robots to take orders, prepare food and bring meals out to diners.  Customers order and pay via touchscreen, then their request is sent to the kitchen where a cooking machine heats up the buns and patties. When it’s ready, a robot ‘waiter’ brings out their takeout bag.   

‘This is the first time I’ve actually seen such robots, so they are really amazing and fun,’ Shin Hyun Soo, an office worker at No Brand in Seoul for the first time, told the AP. 

Human workers add toppings to the burgers and wrap them up in takeout bags before passing them over to yellow-and-black serving robots, which have been compared to Minions. 

Also in Korea, the Italian restaurant chain Mad for Garlic is using serving robots even for sit-down customers. Using 3D space mapping and other technology, the electronic ‘waiter,’ known as Aglio Kim, navigates between tables with up to five orders.  Mad for Garlic manager Lee Young-ho said kids especially like the robots, which can carry up to 66lbs in their trays.

These catering robots look nothing like their human counterparts – in fact they are nothing more than glorified food trolleys so using our thumb rule from the movies, mankind is safe from imminent takeover but clearly  Korean hospitality sector workers’ jobs are not.

And right there is the dichotomy – replacement by stealth.  Remote-controlled robotic waiters and waitresses don’t need to be paid, they don’t go on strike and they don’t spread disease so it’s a sure bet their army is already on the march.

But there may be more redundancies on the way as well.  Have you noticed how AI designers have an inability to use words of more than one syllable?  So ‘robot’ has become ‘bot’ and ‘android’ simply ‘droid?  Well, guys, if you continue to build machines ultimately smarter than yourselves you ‘rons  may find yourself surplus to requirements too – that’s ‘moron’ to us polysyllabic humans”!

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!