Connect with us
Advertisement

Enki Journeys to Earth

Benson C Saili
THIS EARTH, MY BROTHER…

Nibiru’s second-ranked Prince and its leading scientist heads gold prospecting party to what was now officially recognised as Alalu’s realm

It took one shar – a Nibiru year, equivalent to 3600 Earth years – for  Enki and his team to prepare for the journey to Earth. The gold was to be extracted from the sea and so appropriate equipment had to be fashioned. Enki was to travel with 50 “Heroes”, a new term coined for the expeditionary force that was to serve up the vital gold; this required the design and manufacture of a sizeable spaceship, or Celestial Boats as the Anunnaki called them. A new Tablet of Destiny (a device to be used by Mission Control Centre to track and control orbits and trajectories) was to be crafted.  Finally, a means other than nuclear weapons to clear the way through the dreaded Asteroid Belt was to be devised.

It was Nibiru’s Jack of all Trades, its greatest engineer, Enki, who stepped up to the challenge. It was he who designed a spaceship engine that was fuelled by nothing other than water. As if that was not mind-boggling enough, the great Enki this time around designed water cannons with a blasting power that could easily tame the notorious asteroid boulders!  

The Heroes’ departure day was beamed live on television throughout Nibiru, being the most significant interplanetary expedition the world had ever undertaken. Tens of thousands gathered at the space centre, including Nibiru royalty and the planet’s Who Was Who to bid farewell to Enki and his party.

Enki was the last to board the spaceship. Before he did, he was hugged and blessed by his step father King Anu and his mother Queen Antu who had travelled all the way from Orion just to bestow travelling blessings on her eldest son.  Perhaps the most emotional spectacle was the sight of Enki and his step-brother Enlil, the Jehovah/Yahweh of the Old Testament, embrace, both with glazed eyes. Such a public display of mutual affection between the two antagonistic brothers was unheard of. Lastly, Enki kissed his equally misty-eyed wife Damkina and into the spaceship he disappeared. He recalls, in his memoirs, that he was “heavy of heart”.

The captain of the flight was not Enki but a pilot called Anzu. Anzu, a low-ranking prince, was chosen for his silky-smooth piloting skills. Enki sat alongside him and as the spaceship sailed through space and went past the outer planets, Enki noticed that the planet AN (Uranus) lay “on its side”. In other words, it had a western and eastern pole instead of the usual, inclined north and south pole that typified all the other planets of the Solar System.  What Enki noticed half a million years ago was only confirmed by modern astronomers in the 20th century.

The Asteroid Belt passage was a slum dunk. Enki’s Water Thrusters wrought  wonders. “The force of a thousand Heroes' team stream of water was thrust,” he relates in Zechariah Sitchin’s The Lost Book of Enki.  “One by one the boulders turned face; a path for the chariot they were making!” Enki was amazed at the number and almost organic tenacity of the asteroids. “As one boulder fled, another in its stead was attacking. A multitude beyond counting was their number, a host for the splitting of Tiamat (the primordial planet  which was located between Mars and Jupiter and whose demolition by a come-from-nowhere Nibiru also gave rise to the Asteroid Belt and planet Earth) revenge seeking!”

But capitulate did the boulders do, thereby  allowing clear passage for the spaceship. The Heroes set up a joyful noise but it was short-lived, for almost immediately Anzu announced that the water fuel was nearing exhaustion and what was in the tank was not sufficient to traverse the rest of the journey.  Enki suggested that they make an emergency landing on LAHMU (Mars) for possible refueling. Enki knew Mars must have had water for “snow white was its cap (North Pole), snow white was its sandals (South Pole)”.

Indeed as the spaceship descended through the Mars atmosphere, Enki saw that the “reddish-hued” planet was “in its midst aglitter with lakes and rivers”. The Mars of  old was awash with water. The spaceship landed on a lakeside and Enki and Anzu led the Heroes out. Enki quickly tested the water and the atmosphere and found that whereas the water was fit for drinking, the  air was insufficient for breathing. Then having refuelled, the Heroes  reboarded the spaceship and set a direct course for Earth.  

LEGEND OF THE FISH GOD IS BORN

Enki and his 50-man-strong team arrived on Earth during the second Glacial Period, which ran between 480,000 to 430,000 years ago (Earth’s climate undergoes periodic icing and de-icing phases). It is no surprise, therefore, that as they circled Earth whilst bracing to land, the first thing the  Heroes noticed was that huge swathes of the planet were ice-bound.  It was only around the tropics that it was “dark-hued”. Because of the presence of extensive ice sheets both in the northern and southern hemisphere, the Anunnaki sometimes referred to the planet as “Snow-hued Earth”.

The Anunnaki name for Earth was   actually “Ki” (which came to be pronounced as GE or GI by future civilisations) but this was an abbreviation. The full name was MUL-KI, meaning “a celestial body that has been cleaved apart”. The name recalled to mind its severance 4 billion years ago from the primeval planet Tiamat. In another vein, “Ki” was the shortened form of “Eke”, one of the multiple titles of Enki’s mother, the Queen of the Sirian-Orion Empire. In yet another vein, “Ki” was the truncated form of “KISIRI”, another name by which our planet  was later known by the ancients. Kisiri  meant “Mineral Resource Centre”. The  name arose by virtue of Earth’s bountiful mineral riches.     

Unlike Alalu’s, Enki’s Celestial Boat  did not crash-land; it splashed down in the Arabian Sea, the western part of the Indian Ocean. Then donning underwater gear, Enki and his team cruised for part of the way to the edge of the Persian marshlands, where they had picked up Alalu’s signal, and swam the rest of the way.  Thus began the legend often encountered among many a people around the world of a “Fish God who emerged from the waters”.  The “God” who came from the sea, who some cultures even depict as half-fish, half-man, was actually Enki.

The Babylonian historian–priest, Berossus, wrote of the legend of one Oannes the Fish God, “the being endowed with reason, a god who made his appearance from the Erythrean Sea (the ancient name for the Arabian Sea) in the first year of the descent of Kingship from Heaven (that is, Nibiru, the planet of the Old Testament gods)”.  But Berossus was also quick to add that “although Oannes looked like a fish, he had a human head under the fish’s head and had feet like a man under the fish’s tail; his voice, too, and language were articulate and human”. The three Greek historians who actually transmitted to us what Berossus wrote record that “such divine fish-men appeared periodically, coming ashore from the Erythrean Sea”. The Anunnaki, when they from time to time landed in the sea and emerged in their divers’ suits, were misconceived by benighted Earthlings as “fish-men” though at the same time revered as gods.  To this day, the Dogons of Mali, for instance,  continue to worship a fish-god called Nommo – their name for Enki.

ENKI’S AFFINITY FOR SNAKES

The pioneering Anunnaki chose Mesopotamia, ancient southern Iraq, as their first settlement on Earth. Why?

Firstly, coming from a much cooler place than Earth (on Nibiru, the Sun is for three quarters of  the year only seen the way we see stars), they sought a fertile, well-watered  environment with a temperate climate.  Mesopotamia bore all these attributes. It was not the barren and sweltering hot desert it is today: it had rich loamy soil which lent itself to agriculture, particularly horticulture, and was encompassed by four, surging rivers the most significant of which were the Tigris and Euphrates. As for palatability of weather, even the Bible itself attests to this: it says God (who turns out to be Enlil) was in the habit of taking leisurely promenades with Adam and Eve “in the cool of the day”.

Secondly, the Anunnaki  wanted a rich source of fuel and energy. Again Mesopotamia was the ideal place: it was so richly endowed with bitumens, tars, pitches, and asphalts. These bubbled or flowed up to the surface naturally: there was no need to drill for them.   

As Enki and his Heroes approached, Alalu cheerily kept bellowing in his megaphone, “To Earth be welcome”. When Enki stepped ashore and took off  his aqualung, Alalu hastened over and the two were seen to be locked in an emotional embrace, being father- and son-in-law. After the rest of the team had paid  Alalu homage befitting a King, Enki instructed Chief Pilot Anzu to relay word to Mission Control Centre on Nibiru that they had landed safely and were warmly received by the King of Earth.   Alalu wasted no time in officially designating Enki as Earth’s Chief Executive. Enki would also be the liaison man between Earth and Nibiru at the pleasure of  King Alalu.

Like Alalu, Enki too was puzzled by the infinitesimally short hours of daytime. And when for the first time Enki and his team saw the golden sunset, it threw a scare into them, whereupon an amused Alalu told them that was how dusk was heralded on Earth. As for the night itself, during which the Heroes again marvelled at the splendid silvery orb that was the Moon,   Enki noted that it was “beyond imagining short”. In fact, the Heroes did not retire to sleep on the first night: accustomed to comparatively very lengthy days and nights on Nibiru, Earth’s night passed in a blur to them.    

On the Heroes’ second day on Earth, Enki set them to work straight off. They were detailed to, amongst other things, build permanent, livable structures, dredge the beds of streams and tributaries to allow a better flow of the waters, erect a fence around the estate to ward off wild animals, and assemble boats using the tools and equipment they had brought with them in the now docked spaceship. Enki says when he came to Earth, the planet was to a greater extent waterlogged as a lot of water had been captured as ice on landmasses.     Their estate  was therefore built on ground artificially raised above the waters of the marshlands. At the time, the Persian Gulf was not a sea but a stretch of marshlands and shallow lakes, which explains why Enki and his party chose to land far afield in the Arabian Sea.  

Enki was instrumental in building his own magnificent house, which  doubled as a temple. He named it  EABZU, meaning “House of the Supernatural Spirit”, that is, “House of God” (from aba [supernatural], and su [spirit]). Naturally, Enki whose Orion race evolved from a snake species, was  fanatically fascinated by Earth’s   snakes. His  innate scientific instincts inclined him to study them at close quarters to find out the extent to which they resembled the serpents of  Orion.  In the process,  he developed an awed  affinity for them. He boasts that,  “I built my house in a pure place … Its shade stretches over the Snake Marsh”. In other words, a natural snake pond was encompassed in his yard! Enki’s snake ancestry explains why he was also referred to as – and symbolised by – the Serpent in the muddled  Genesis account called the Fall (of  Adam and Eve).

Also enclosed within Enki’s compound was a natural fish pond. “The carp fish wave tails in it, among the small reeds,” he recounts. This is not surprising in view of the fact that he was a famed and avid fisherman.  As  construction activities proceeded apace, Enki unwound by way of a boat cruise along the shallow but expansive marshlands – his childhood hobby which dovetailed rather well with his given name of Ea – “He Whose House is Water”. He was often accompanied by several crewmen, who he led in songs as they rode along (like the all-round maven he was, Enki is said to have been a phenomenally gifted musician too and by some accounts Nibiru’s maestro royal entertainer!) and sailed the seas. In this respect, he would later become known as the God of the Sea (Poseidon in Greek).

ENKI DESIGNATES SATURDAY AS DAY OF REST

The Heroes took six days to complete the construction of their initial settlement (These possibly were not six 24-hour-days but 60 or even 600 days considering that the Anunnaki used sexagesimal mathematics, which was based not on our modern-day Base 10 but Base 60). On the seventh day, Enki assembled his team to congratulate them for a job well done. He addressed them thus: “A hazardous journey we have undertaken, from Nibiru to the seventh planet a dangerous way we have traversed. At Earth we with success arrived, much good we attained, an encampment we established. Let this day be a day of rest; the seventh day hereafter a day of resting always to be!”

Earth was the 7th planet from the direction Nibiru approaches, after Pluto, Neptune, Uranus, Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars in that order. It was therefore more than a coincidence that the 7th day was chosen as a day of  rest from all forms of work. This is yet another intriguing revelation since we now know where the Levites, the authors of the first five books of the Bible, pinched the idea of the “six days of creation”  from. They attribute the consecration of the 7th day to Enlil, also called Yahweh/Jehovah, when it was Enki who set Saturday aside as a special day merely of relaxation and not for religious purposes. At the time, Enlil was yet to  show up on Earth.       

It was on the same 7th day  of Enki’s arrival on Earth that he coined a name for the Anunnaki’s first city on Earth, around where the Iraq city-province  of  Basra is found today. He called it ERIDU, which means “A Home Away from Home”, or put differently, a settlement well away from home planet Nibiru. It is a name that over time evolved into “Earth” and which has taken root in practically every major language on the planet.

“To this very day,” writes Zechariah Sitchin, “the Persian term Ordu means ‘encampment’… The settled Earth is called Erde in German, Erda in High German, Jordh in Icelandic, Jord  in Danish, Airtha in Gothic, and  Erthe in Middle English. And going back geographically and in time, Earth was Aratha or Ereds in Aramaic, Erd or  Ertz in Kurdish, and Eretz in Hebrew.”  Thus, every time we utter the word “Earth” (which, intriguingly, incorporates Enki’s born name “Ea”), we commemorate Enki’s arrival and settlement on a lonely outpost on our then half-frozen planet!   It is just as well, anyway, for as we shall soon discover, Enki is our God in a manner of speaking.       

On the same 7th day, Enki and his party ceremonially instituted Alalu as the King of Eridu – and by extension King of Earth.  On his part, Alalu was so impressed by the dizzying civil engineering feats Enki put on parade in laying the overall infrastructure of  Eridu that he conferred on him the title NUDIMMUD, which means “The Artful Fashioner”.

It turned out Enki was not only capable of fashioning structures; he could also fashion life!

NEXT WEEK:   JEHOVAH REINFORCES ENKI

Continue Reading

Columns

Hell Up in Judea

24th August 2021

A case can be made, General Atiku, that history’s most infamous Roman is Pontius Pilate. It was Pilate who condemned Jesus, the  “Son of God”, to the most cruel, most barbaric,  and most excruciating of deaths – crucifixion –  and cowardly at that as the gospels attest for us.  

Yet the exact circumstances under which the crucifixion took place and what followed thereafter far from jells with what is familiarly known. The fact of the matter was that there was a lot of political wheeling and dealing and boldfaced corruption on the part both of the Jewish authorities and the Roman establishment in the person of Pontius Pilate.  In this piece, we attempt, General, to present a fuller photo of Pilate as the centre of the whole machination.

Pilate’s historicity, General, is not in doubt. In 1961, an Italian archeologist unearthed a limestone block at Caesarea Maritima on the Mediterranean coast of Israel, which as of 6 AD was the Roman seat of government as well as the military headquarters.  The block bore the inscription, “Pontius Pilate, the Prefect of Judea, has dedicated this Temple to the divine Augusti” (that is, then Roman Emperor Tiberius Caesar and his wife Livia).

Pilate also gets varying degrees of mention in the works of Roman senator and historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-117 AD); the Hellenistic Jewish philosopher and chronicler Philo of Alexandria (25 BC to 50 AD); and the legendary Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (37-100 AD).

Although his year of death (37 AD) is documented, his year of birth is a matter of conjecture, General. He came from the Pontii tribe (hence the name Pontius), a tough, warlike people. The Pontii tribe was of the equestrian class, the second-tier in the Roman caste system. Originally, the equestrians were those Romans with ample pocket power to bribe their way to knightly ranks in the Roman army. Pilate was born to Marcus Pontius, who had distinguished himself as a general in Rome’s military campaigns.

Following one of his particularly sterling military exploits, Marcus was awarded with the Pilum (javelin), a Roman decoration of honour for heroic military service.  To commemorate this medal of valour, the family took the name Pilati, rendered Pilate in English and Pilatus in Latin.

The son, Lucius Pontius Pilate, also distinguished himself as a soldier in the German campaigns of Germanicus, a prominent general of the early Roman Empire. Thanks to his scintillating military profile coupled with   strategic connections in the hierarchies of the Roman government, Pilate was able to wend his way into the heart of Claudia, the granddaughter of Caesar Augustus, the founder of the Roman Empire and ruler from 27 BC to 14 AD.

Claudia’s mother was Julia the Elder, who was also the biological mother of the apostles John and James. When Claudia was about 13 years of age, Julia sent her to Rome to be reared in the courts of Emperor Tiberius Caesar, to whom Julia was once married from 11 BC to 6 BC.

Although Tiberius was not the biological father of Claudius, General, he gladly acquiesced to being her foster father in deference to the memory of her late grandfather Caesar Augustus.
Pilate arrived in Rome when Claudia was sixteen years of age. In AD 26, the two tied the knot. Needless to say, it was a marriage based not on love as such but on political opportunism.

ASSIGNMENT JUDEA

The high-placed connection who facilitated Pontius Pilate’s smooth landing into the inner sanctums of Rome’s royalty and put him on a pedestal that saw him take pride of place in the cosmic gallery of rogues was Aelius Sejanus. Like Pilate, Sejanus came from the subordinate equestrian class, who would never be eligible for a seat in the Senate, the legislative council of ancient Rome.

Sejanus, however, had over time become Emperor Tiberius’ most trusted lieutenant and to the point where he was the de facto prime minister.  He had been commander of the Praetorian Guard, the elite Special Forces unit created by Augustus Caesar as a personal security force, which developed under Sejanus’ command into the most significant presence in Rome.

In AD 26, the emperor was not even based in Rome: he had confined himself to the 10.4 km2 island of Capri, about 264 km from Rome, and left control of Rome and the government of the Roman Empire to Sejanus. It was Sejanus who recommended the appointment of Pilate as prefect, or governor/procurator of Judea. The appointment was pronounced right on the occasion of Pilate’s nuptials with Claudius.

Philo records that when the bridal party emerged from the temple where the marriage ceremony was celebrated and Pilate started to follow the bride into the imperial litter, Tiberius, who was one of the twelve witnesses required to attend the ceremony, held him back and handed him a document. It was the wedding present – the governorship of far-flung Judea – with orders to proceed at once to Caesarea Maritima to take over the office made vacant by the recall of Valerius Gratus.

Pilate was notified by Sejanus that a ship was in fact waiting upon him to transport him to Palestine right away. The only disadvantageous aspect about the assignment was that Pilate was to leave the shores of Rome alone, without the pleasure of spending a first night in the arms of his newly wedded wife: by imperial decree, the wives of governors were not allowed to accompany them in their jurisdictions. Pilate, however, was a royal by marriage and so this prohibition was waived. By special permission granted by His Imperial Majesty Tiberius Caesar, Claudia soon joined her husband in Judea. The wily Pilate had calculated well when he married into royalty.

A SADISTIC ADMINISTRATOR

The Judean perch was not prestigious though, General. The prefects of Judea were not of high social status. At least one – Felix, referenced by Luke in the Acts of the Apostles – was an ex-slave, which says a great deal on the low regard in which the province was held by Rome.

Pilate was only secondarily sent to Judea on account of having married into royalty: his posting to the volatile province stemmed, primarily, from his being of a inferior social pedigree. Be that as it may, Pilate relished the posting in that it gave him the chance to exercise power, absolute power. Absolute power corrupts absolutely and in Pilate was the archetypal example, General.

Pilate’s brief was simple: to collect taxes, maintain law and order, maintain infrastructure, and keep the population subdued. Although he was born lowly, he positively had the power of life and death over his Jewish subjects. Let us, General, listen to Josephus in his allusion to Coponius, Judea’s first Roman governor and who like Pilate was from the same subservient social class: “And now Archelaus’ part of Judea was reduced into a province and Coponius, one of the equestrian order among the Romans, was sent as procurator, having the power of life and death put into his hands by Caesar.”

Pilate, General, was callous to a point of being sadistic. He was scarcely the scrupling judge with the rare soft spot that we encounter in the gospels. Philo charges him with “corruptibility, violence, robberies, ill-treatment of the people, grievances, continuous executions without even the form of a trial, endless and intolerable cruelties”.

He further declares him to be a “savage, inflexible, and arbitrary ruler” who was of a “stubborn and harsh quality” and “could not bring himself to do anything that might cause pleasure to the Jews”. The essentially humane character of the Pilate who presided over the trial of Jesus as portrayed in the gospels may not be wholly fictitious but is highly embellished, General.

Why did Pilate have such a pathological hatred of the Jews, General? Sejanus had more to do with it than the spontaneous leanings of his own nature. According to Philo, Sejanus hated the Jews like the plague and wished “to do away with the nation” – to exterminate it. In AD 19, for instance, he forced the Jews in Rome to burn their religious vestments and expelled them from the city without much ado.

For as long as Sejanus was in power, General, Pilate could do pretty much as he pleased. He didn’t have to worry about compromising reportage reaching the emperor as everything went through the implacably anti-Jewish Sejanus. Sejanus was unrivalled in power: golden statues of the general were being put up in Rome, the Senate had voted his birthday a public holiday, public prayers were offered on behalf of Tiberius and Sejanus, and in AD 31 Sejanus was named as Consul jointly with Tiberius.

The Judea posting also gave Pilate a golden opportunity to make money – lots of it. The governors of the Roman provinces were invariably rapacious, greedy, and incompetent: this we learn not only from Jewish historians of the day but from contemporary Roman writers as well such as Tacitus and Juvenal.

As long as the money skimmed from the provinces was not overly excessive, governors were allowed a free hand. It is said of Emperor Tiberius that, “Once he ordered a governor to reverse a steep rise in taxes saying, ‘I want my sheep shorn, not skinned’!” For those governors, such as Pilate, who had support from the very acmes of Roman power, General, they were practically a law unto themselves.

PILATE’S WINGS ARE CLIPPED

Pontius Pilate, General, was untrained in political office. Furthermore, he was a sycophant to the core who was prepared to go to any length in a bid to curry favour with and prove his loyalty to the powers that be in Rome.    Both these attributes gave rise to a series of blunders that brought him the intense hatred of the Jews.

The first abomination he committed in the eyes of the Jews, General, was to set up a temple dedicated to Emperor Tiberius, which he called the Tiberieum, making him the only known Roman official to have built a temple to a living emperor.  True, Roman emperors were worshipped, but Tiberius was the one exception. According to the Roman scholar and historian Suetonius, Tiberius did not allow the consecration of temples to himself. Pilate’s act therefore, General, was an overkill: it was not appreciated at all.

Throughout his tenure, General, Pilate had a series of run-ins with the Jews, some of which entailed a lot of bloodshed and one of which sparked an insurrection that paved the way to Calvary. Then it all began to unravel, General. On October 18 AD 31, his patron Sejanus was summoned to the office of Emperor Tiberius and an angry denunciation was read out to him. It is not clear, General, what caused Sejanus’ fall from the emperor’s good graces but circumstantial evidence points to the perceived threat to the emperor’s power.

As the ancient historian Cassius Dio puts it, “Sejanus was so great a person by reason both of his excessive haughtiness and of his vast power that to put it briefly, he himself seemed to be the emperor and Tiberius a kind of island potentate, inasmuch as the latter spent his time on the island of Capri.”  Sejanus, hitherto the most powerful man in Rome, General, was thrown into a dungeon.

That same evening, he was summarily condemned to death, extracted from his cell, hung, and had his body given over to a crowd that tore it to pieces in a frenzy of manic excitement. His three children were all executed over the following months and his wife, Tiberius’ own daughter, committed suicide.  The people further celebrated his downfall by pulling his statues over.  Meanwhile, General, Tiberius began pursuing all those who could have been involved in the “plots” of Sejanus.

In Judea, Pilate, a Sejanus appointee, must have been badly shaken, General. Were his friends and family under suspicion? Would he be purged like others? Imperial attitudes to the Jewish race seemed to have changed now with the riddance of Sejanus. Tiberius made sure this was the case by appointing a new governor for Syria (who went by the title Legate and to whom Pilate was obligated to report).

The governor, Lucius Pomponius Flaccus, arrived in Rome in AD 32. Philo records that Tiberius now “charged his procurators in every place to which they were appointed to speak comfortably to the members of our nation in the different cities, assuring them that the penal measures did not extend to all but only to the guilty who were few, and to disturb none of the established customs but even to regard them as a trust committed to their care, the people as naturally peaceable and the institution as an influence promoting orderly conduct.”

So Pilate, General, had lost his supporters at the top, his new boss was on his doorstep, and there had been a change of policy regarding the very people he was in charge of. Surely, he would have to watch his step. The fact of the matter, however, General, was that he hardly did so.  In November 32 AD, for instance, he provoked a mini-uprising by the Zealots led by Judas Iscariot, Theudas Barabbas, and Simon Zelotes. It was this revolt, General, that culminated in those three “crosses” of Calvary that are indelibly etched on the mind of every Christian.

NEXT WEEK: ZEALOT REVOLT AGAINST PILATE

Continue Reading

Columns

Hustle & Muscle

24th August 2021

Until as recently as the 1980s a career often meant a job for life within a single company or organisation. Phrases such as ‘climbing the corporate ladder’, ‘the glass ceiling’, ‘wage slave’ & ‘the rat race’ were thrown about, the analogies making clear that a career path was a toxic mix of a war of attrition, indentured drudgery and a Sisyphean treadmill.

In all cases you fought, grafted or plodded on till you reached retirement age, at which point you could expect a small leaving party, the promise of a pension and, oddly, a gift of either a clock or watch. The irony of being rewarded with a timepiece on the very day you could expect to no longer be a workday prisoner was apparently lost on management – the hands of time were destined to follow you to the grave!

Retirement was the goal at the end of the long, corporate journey, time on your hands – verifiable by your gifted time keeping device – to spend time working in the garden, playing with the grandchildren, enjoying a holiday or two and generally killing time till time killed you.

For some, retirement could be literally short-lived. The retirement age, and accompanying pension, was predicated on the old adage of three scores years and ten being the average life expectancy of man. As the twentieth century progressed and healthcare became more sophisticated, that former mean average was extended but that in itself then brought with it the double-edged sword of dementia. The longer people lived, the more widespread dementia became – one more life lottery which some won, some lost and doctors were seemingly unable to predict who would succumb and who would survive.

However, much research has been carried out on the causes of this crippling and cruel disease and the latest findings indicate that one of its root causes may lie in the former workplace – what your job entailed and how stimulating or otherwise it was. It transpires that having an interesting job in your forties could lessen the risk of getting dementia in old age, the mental stimulation possibly staving off the onslaught of the condition by around 18 months.

Academics examined more than 100,000 participants and tracked them for nearly two decades. They spotted a third fewer cases of dementia among people who had engaging jobs which involved demanding tasks and more control — such as government officers, directors, physicians, dentists and solicitors, compared to adults in ‘passive’ roles — such as supermarket cashiers, vehicle drivers and machine operators. And those who found their own work interesting also had lower levels of proteins in their blood that have been linked with dementia.

The study was carried out by researchers from University College London, the University of Helsinki and Johns Hopkins University studying the cognitive stimulation and dementia risk in 107,896 volunteers, who were regularly quizzed about their job.  The volunteers — who had an average age of around 45 — were tracked for between 14 and 40 years.  Jobs were classed as cognitively stimulating if they included demanding tasks and came with high job control. Non-stimulating ‘passive’ occupations included those with low demands and little decision-making power.

4.8 cases of dementia per 10,000 person years occurred among those with interesting careers, equating to 0.8 per cent of the group. In contrast, there were 7.3 cases per 10,000 person years among those with repetitive jobs (1.2 per cent). Among people with jobs that were in the middle of these two categories, there were 6.8 cases per 10,000 person years (1.12 per cent).

The link between how interesting a person’s work was and rates of dementia did not change for different genders or ages.Lead researcher Professor Mika Kivimaki, from UCL, said: ‘Our findings support the hypothesis that mental stimulation in adulthood may postpone the onset of dementia. The levels of dementia at age 80 seen in people who experienced high levels of mental stimulation was observed at age 78.3 in those who had experienced low mental stimulation. This suggests the average delay in disease onset is about one and half years, but there is probably considerable variation in the effect between people.’

The study, published this week in the British Medical Journal, also looked at protein levels in the blood among another group of volunteers. These proteins are thought to stop the brain forming new connections, increasing the risk of dementia. People with interesting jobs had lower levels of three proteins considered to be tell-tale signs of the condition.

Scientists said it provided ‘possible clues’ for the underlying biological mechanisms at play. The researchers noted the study was only observational, meaning it cannot establish cause and that other factors could be at play. However, they insisted it was large and well-designed, so the findings can be applied to different populations.

To me, there is a further implication in that it might be fair to expect that those in professions such as law, medicine and science might reasonably be expected to have a higher IQ than those in blue collar roles. This could indicate that mental capacity also plays a part in dementia onset but that’s a personal conclusion and not one reached by the study.

And for those stuck in dull jobs through force of circumstance, all is not lost since in today’s work culture, the stimulating side-hustle is fast becoming the norm as work becomes not just a means of financial survival but a life-enhancing opportunity , just as in the old adage of ‘Find a job you enjoy and you’ll never work another day in your life’!

Dementia is a global concern but ironically it is most often seen in wealthier countries, where people are likely to live into very old age and is the second biggest killer in the UK behind heart disease, according to the UK Office for National Statistics. So here’s a serious suggestion to save you from an early grave and loss of competencies – work hard, play hard and where possible, combine the two!

Continue Reading

Columns

The Lord Ties The Knot

18th August 2021
JUDAS

… as Judas Iscariot takes strong exception

The gospels which were excluded from the official canon, the New Testament, at the Council of Nicaea are known as the Apocrypha. One of these Apocryphal works, General Atiku, is the gospel of Phillip.  In this gospel, the intimate relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene is openly discussed thus:

“And the companion of the Saviour is Mary Magdalene. But Christ loved her more than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on the mouth.  The rest of the disciples were offended by it and expressed disapproval. They said unto him, why do you love her more than all of us? The Saviour answered and said to them, why do   I not love you like her? … Great is the mystery of marriage, for without it the world would never have existed. Now, the existence of the world depends on man, and the existence of man on marriage.”

It is clear from the above statement, General, that Jesus held marriage in high regard because he himself was part and parcel of it.  The disciples (that is, most of them) were offended not because he and Mary were an item but because they simply did not approve of her as she was a Gentile and a commoner.

Otherwise, the kissing was not offensive at all: it was a customary expression of mutual affection between the sacred bride and groom. This we gather from the prototypically romantic Old Testament text known as The Song of Solomon, which opens with the words, “Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth: for thy love is better than wine.”  As the Davidic groom, Jesus was therefore entitled to kiss Mary Magdalene as his bride.

THE FIRST MARRIAGE

In September AD 30, General Atiku, Jesus and Mary Magdalene had their First Marriage ceremony. Jesus had turned 36 in that year, the appropriate marriage age for a Davidic heir, and September was the holiest month in the Jewish calendar.  Having been born irregularly himself (in the wrong month of the year because of his father Joseph’s intransigence), Jesus was determined that he himself follow the law to the letter so that his child would not suffer the same indignities as he did. The First Marriage is captured in LUKE 7:35-50.

The marriage took place at the home of Simon the Pharisee. This, General, was another name for Simon Zelotes, the stepfather of Mary Magdalene. Although Mary Magdalene is not directly named, she is described as a “sinner”. This was another term for Gentiles, as in the eyes of the Jewish God, they were unregenerate and therefore hopeless sinners.  Mary Magdalene, whose mother Helena-Salome was of Syrian origin (Syro-Phoenicia to be specific), was a Gentile.

On the occasion, Mary Magdalene performed three acts on Jesus as set out in LUKE 7:38. She wept; kissed his feet; and anointed him with ointment. This is what a bride was supposed to do to her groom as clearly evinced in The Song of Solomon, a series of love poems concerning a spouse and her husband the King.

Of the three rites, perhaps it is the weeping that require elucidation, General. This was at once symbolic and sentimental.  The First Marriage was simply a ceremony: the moment the ceremony was over, the husband and wife separated, that is, they lived apart until the month of December, when they came together under one roof.  This was in accord with Essene stipulations for dynastic marriages, that is, those of the Davidic Messiah and the priestly Messiah.

Prior to the First Marriage, the bride was known as an Almah, meaning a betrothed Virgin. After the First Marriage ceremony, the Almah was demoted to a Sister. This was because the ensuing three-month separation meant husband and wife would not indulge in sexual activity and so the wife was as good as a sister to her husband. The imagery of Sister also being a wife is seen in 1 CORINTHIANS 9:5, where the apostle Paul refers to his wife as Sister. In ACTS 23:16, Paul’s wife is again referred to as his Sister.

Now, when the Almah became a Sister, General, she was metaphorically called a Widow, because she was being separated  from her newly wedded husband. As such, she was expected to symbolically weep on account of this separation. That explains why Mary Magdalene had to weep at her first wedding. It is a pity, General, that most Christians and their clergy miss the real story so wrongly indoctrinated are they.

In December AD 30, Jesus moved in with Mary Magdalene to consummate the marriage. It was hoped that Mary would fall pregnant so that in March the following year, a Second (and final) Marriage ceremony would be held.  Sadly, conception did not take place. According to Essene dynastic procreational rules, the couple had to separate again. They would reunite in December AD 31 for another try at conception.

The reason they separated was because for a dynastic heir, marriage was purely for procreation and not for recreational sex. But even that year, General, Mary did not fall pregnant, necessitating another year-long separation. What that meant was that Mary would be given one more last chance – in December AD 32, by which time Jesus would have been 38.  If she did not conceive this time around, the marriage would come to an end through a legal divorce and Jesus would be free to seek a new spouse.

THE FINAL MARRIAGE

In December 32, Mary Magdalene, General, finally conceived. When Jesus was crucified therefore in April 33 AD, his wife was three months pregnant. By this time, the Second Marriage ceremony, the final one, had already taken place, this being in March. The Second Marriage is cursorily related in MATTHEW 26:6-13; MARK 14:3-9; and JOHN 12:1-8.The John version reads as follows:

“Jesus, therefore, six days before the Passover, came to Bethany, where was Lazarus, who had died, whom he raised out of the dead; they made, therefore, to him a supper there, and Martha was ministering, and Lazarus was one of those reclining together (at meat) with him; Mary, therefore, having taken a pound of ointment of spikenard, of great price, anointed the feet of Jesus and did wipe with her hair his feet, and the house was filled from the fragrance of the ointment.

Therefore said one of his disciples – Judas Iscariot, of Simon, who was about to deliver him up – ‘Therefore was not this ointment sold for three hundred denaries, and given to the poor?’ and he said this, not because he was caring for the poor, but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and what things were put in he was carrying. Jesus, therefore, said, ‘Suffer her; for the day of my embalming she has kept it, for the poor you have always with yourselves, and me you have not always.’”

This story (also see JOHN 11:1-44) centres on four people primarily, General. They are Jesus; Lazarus; Mary; and Martha. “Mary” was actually Mary Magdalene.  “Martha” was a titular name for her mother, Helena-Salome.  In the Lazarus story, the two ladies are referred to as “sisters”. This denotes conventual sisters, like the Catholics refer to conventual nuns, and not sisters by blood. Helena-Salome actually headed a nunnery. By the same token, the reference to Lazarus as “brother” has a connotation akin to what Pentecostals refer to as “Brother in Christ”.

Thus, the story revolves around Jesus the groom; his bride Mary Magdalene; his father-in-law Simon Zelotes; and his mother-in-law Helena-Salome. This is a family affair folks, which provides strong hints as to the exact relationship between Jesus and Mary. The raising from the dead of a man called Lazarus, sadly, was not a miracle at all:  it was a ceremonial restoration from excommunication back to the Essene governing council, which comprised of Jesus and his so-called 12 disciples.

The “Lazarus” who was thus restored was actually Simon Zelotes, at the time the most “beloved” by Jesus of the entire apostolic band, who had been demoted under circumstances relating to a Zealot uprising against Pontius Pilate.  More will be said on the subject at a later stage.

The anointing of Jesus by Mary with “spikenard”, General, harps back to ancient married rituals as patently demonstrated in The Song of Solomon. This was the second time Mary had anointed Jesus, first at the First Marriage in September AD 30 AD and now at the Second Marriage in March 32 AD. On both occasions, Mary anointed Jesus whilst he sat at table.

In SONG OF SOLOMON 1:12, the bride says, “While the King sitteth at his table, my spikenard sendeth forth the smell thereof”.  The anointing in the gospels was therefore an allusion to the ancient rite whereby a royal bride prepared her groom’s table. Only as the wife of Jesus and as a priestess in her own right could Mary Magdalene have anointed both the feet and head of Jesus.

The anointing in effect had two purposes: first, to seal the marriage, and second, to officially announce to the Jewish nation that Jesus was the Davidic Messiah (and not his younger brother James, who had been so promoted by John the Baptist).  It all harped back to the tradition in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, where Kings or Pharaohs were anointed for office (in their case with crocodile fat) by their half-sister brides.

The King’s bride actually kept the anointment substance for use for one more time – when the King died. You can now understand, General, why Jesus said “the day of my embalming she has kept it” in reference to his anointing by Mary Magdalene and why the first person to feature at the tomb of Jesus was none other than Mary Magdalene!

Three passages in the Lazarus story     (in JOHN11: 1-44) are particularly telling.  They are Verses 20, 28, and 29. They read as follows: “When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went out to meet him, but Mary stayed in the house … After Martha said this, she went back and called her sister Mary privately. ‘The Master is here,’ she told her, ‘and is asking for you.’ When Mary heard this, she got up and hurried out to meet him.”  The reason Mary (Magdalene) first kept her place before proceeding to meet Jesus, General, is not supplied in the Johannine gospel.

However, the Apocryphal document which has come to be known as The Secret Gospel of Mark sheds more light, General.  It explains that on the first occasion, Mary did come out to meet Jesus along with her mother Martha (Helena-Salome) but upon being rebuked by the disciples of Jesus, she repaired back to the house. Why was she lashed out at, General? Because according to the Essene matrimonial code, she was not permitted to come out of her own accord and greet her husband: she was to wait until he had given her express permission to emerge.

There is yet another element in the conduct of Mary Magdalene that has parallels with Solomon’s queen, General. In the back-and-forth romantic dialogue between the couple, the queen is referred to as a “Shulamite” (SONG OF SOLOMON 6:13). The Shulamites were from the Syrian border town of  Solam and we have already seen that Mary’s first foster father, Syro the Jairus, was a Syrian, as was her mother Helena-Salome.

JUDAS DENOUNCES THE MARRIAGE

The marriage of Jesus to Mary Magdalene was vehemently opposed by most of his so-called disciples. The most vociferous on this position, General, was Judas Iscariot. The writer of the John gospel characterises Judas as a “thief” who used to pilfer alms money but that is a smear.  The gospels were written post-eventual and therefore Judas’ name was already in ignominy.

His detractors therefore had a field day at sullying his character. Yet prior to the betrayal, Judas Iscariot, General, was one of the most respected figures among the Essene community. At the time of Jesus’ marriage, Judas was the second-highest ranking Essene after Simon Zelotes (that is the meaning of “Judas of Simon” in the passage quoted above, meaning “Judas the deputy of Simon”): Jesus was third, although politically he was the seniormost.

Judas opposed the marriage on grounds, primarily, that Mary Magdalene was not only a Gentile but a commoner. Judas had the right to pronounce on Jesus’ marriage because it was he who was in charge of the Essene’s order of Dan, to which Mary Magdalene belonged prior to her marriage to Jesus and therefore had the right whether to release her for marriage or retain her in the convent. Judas would rather the spikenard (the most expensive fragrance of the day, the reason it was only used by queens) was sold and the money generated donated to the Essene kitty (“the poor” was another name for Essenes: when Jesus in the Beatitudes said “blessed are the poor”, he was not referring to you and me: he meant the Essenes).

Sadly General, as high-standing as he was, Judas had no right of veto over the marriage of a Davidic heir: only Simon Zelotes had by virtue of his position as the Essene’s Pope. Simon Zelotes was Mary Magdalene’s step-father and there was no way he was going to stand in the way of the marriage of his own daughter. Moreover, Jesus had already begun to fancy himself as Priest-King.

As far as he was concerned therefore, he was at once the Davidic Messiah and the Priestly Messiah – the Melchizedek. Thus even if Simon Zelotes had perchance objected to the marriage, Jesus would have gone ahead with it anyway. It was Jesus’ highly unpopular appropriated role as the Melchizedek, General, that set him on the path to Calvary.

NEXT WEEK: A NEW GOVERNOR COMES TO TOWN

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!