Connect with us
Advertisement

Alalu Heads For Earth

Benson C Saili
THIS EARTH, MY BROTHER…

Solar System’s crucible offers greatest promise for ore bodies and viable existence  

Enki’s marriage to Damkina, a daughter of the deposed and self-exiled Alalu, did not sit well with Ninmah, King Anu’s seniormost daughter.  The matrimony meant Ninmah would be a subordinate wife instead of the principal one.  Since she could not bear to be second-best, Ninmah struck up an affair with her half-brother Enlil. Ninmah was aware a son with Enlil would not inherit the Sirian-Orion throne, but there was a consolation in the offing – the prestige of being Queen of Nibiru, a pre-eminent planet Enlil ruled on behalf of the Sirian-Orion monarch. Of course Ninmah would not be substantive queen considering that Enlil was a Viceroy as opposed to a King with full stripes, but that was secondary: in the eyes of the Nibiriuns, she would enjoy the status of a queen proper.    

Ninmah soon gained a reputation as the leading medical savant on the Wolfen World and as such, she travelled extensively to other planetary colonies to promulgate new breakthroughs in the field of medicine. Whilst she was based on Nibiru in the course of these peregrinations, she became pregnant by Enlil and had a son, NINURTA, or to be exact, NIN-URU-ATA, meaning “Lord of Destruction” (from nin [Lord], uru [to shred, tear], and ata [to kill]), a term that aptly captured the innate ferocity and fierceness of Sirians both as a people and as warriors. Both Enki and King Anu bristled at this development as it amounted to a flagrant breach of the royal fiat: King Anu had decreed that Ninmah was to marry Enki when she came of age. King Anu was so irate he cursed his daughter to lifelong celibacy. She was never to marry for as long as he was alive, which could amount to more than a million years in Earth time.     

Enki also soon had a son with Damkina. He was named MARDUK. This is actually OME-ORI-DA-EKE, meaning “Supreme Divine Spirit/Master” (from ome [divine], ori [spirit or master], da [supreme], and eke [holy]).  The underlying connotation of the name is sanctity. It suggested that the son was of sacred lineage. Of course the one individual who was synonymous with sanctity or righteousness evocatively was the Queen of Orion, Enki’s mother. To ensure that the symbolism was loud and clear, Enki had his son born not on Nibiru, where he was based, but in the prototypical “pure place” – on the SSS world in Orion, where his mother was based.  In the royal Sirian-Orion hierarchy, Marduk was senior to Ninurta as he was designated second only to Enlil as per the terms of the matrimonial union between King Anu and the Orion Queen.   

The wedlock between Anu and the Orion Queen had the effect that the Queen became a ceremonial monarch by and large. It was Anu who now ran the show, particularly in the broader Orion Empire. Anu had given Enlil and Enki to understand that he was going to rule Nibiru jointly with them: he himself would simply be first among a Trinity of Equals. He in effect declared a co-regnum – a joint rulership. Of course this was de facto rather than de jure as the constitution of Nibiru did not provide for such a setup.

When a special meet attended by Anu was in progress on Nibiru, Anu sat on the throne, flanked by Enlil to the right (the origin of the term “Right-Hand Man”) and Enki to the left. Where have you heard this before?    Well, if you haven’t I’ll jog your memory a bit. It is in the Bible, in MATTHEW 20: 20-25. In these passages, the mother of two of Jesus’s disciples, John and James, approaches Jesus and asks him to “grant that one of these two sons of mine sit at your right and the other at your left in your Kingdom”.     Where did “mum” get the idea from? Of course it was from the setup in Nibiru, meaning people of first century Palestine were aware that “Heaven” was actually Nibiru. Intriguingly, Jesus’s reply did confirm such a setup in the “Kingdom”. But were these his own words or the personal interpolation of gospel writers? I know the answer, my brother, but I elect to keep it to myself.

Although Enki was appeased that his son Marduk was the acknowledged heir to the Sirian-Orion throne after Enlil, he and Enlil were to remain mortal adversaries. This was the beginning of two royal, eternally feuding factions – the Enkites and the Enlilites. Enki never really came to terms with the reality of his denial of heirship. Whilst here on Earth, he kept wondering aloud to his compatriots as to why this should happen to him when “I am the leader of the Anunnaki, the firstborn (effectively in light of the union of the Sirian and Orion thrones) of divine Anu, the Big Brother of all the gods (that is, the Anunnaki).”

LITTLE PLUTO SAYS “HELLO!”

When Alalu was ousted by Anu from the Sirius throne, he decided to seek refuge on a far-flung planet that showed the most potential for natural resource endowment. This planet was in the planetary system known as BUIDA, our Solar System. Buida, meaning “The Faraway One” (we’re on the outer fringes of the greater Orion Empre) was also known as ARI-DU, “The Mastered Place” (from ari [master] and du [place]). The planet would later be known, amongst other names, as KISIRI, meaning “Mineral Resource Centre” from ki [to produce, manufacture, or create] and siri [to smelt ore]).   This is planet Earth.     “To snow-hued Earth Alalu set his course,” relates Enki in Zechariah Sitchin’s highly informative work, The Lost Book of Enki.

Alalu’s beeline for Earth was not a journey to the unknown. Whilst he was King, he had sent his most trusted aide, Alalim, the Sirian Master of Genesis Sciences, to assess the prospects of a permanent settlement on the planet. Impressed with what he had found, including that the planet had a clean and abundant atmospheric blanket conducive to life,  Alalim had lingered on the planet for several shars and built a palace that mirrored that of the Sirian King. So contrary to what Sitchin suggests, Alalu did not pioneer the planet: he simply built upon the foundation Alalim had already laid.

Alalu’s journey coincided with the time Nibiru  was heading towards the Sun but before it had reached the ecliptic, the region of the Solar System that stretches from Pluto to Mercury. This is the way he described Nibiru as his spaceship overflew it: “Alluring was its figure, its radiance emblazoned the surrounding heavens. Its measure was enormous, its belching fire (volcanoes)  blazed forth. Its life-sustaining envelope (atmosphere), its hue a redness, was like a sea churning; in its midst the breach (Ozone hole) was distinct, like a darkened wound.”

Whilst en route to Earth, Alalu’s spacecraft had to inevitably go past the planets Pluto, Neptune, Uranus, Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars in that order. Alalu describes the planets exactly as astronomers and planetary scientists know them today and that was over half a million years ago.  “In the expanse of the heavens, the celestials’ emissary was him greeting,” writes Enki of Alalu’s journey. “Little GAGA, The One Who Shows The Way, by its circuit Alalu was greeting, to him a welcome extending. With a leaning gait, before and after the celestial ANTU it was destined to travel. To face backward, to face forward, with two facings was it endowed.”  

“Little GAGA” was Pluto, the smallest planet in the Solar System, now demoted to a minor planet anyway. ANTU was the earlier name for Neptune. Note Alalu’s description of Pluto’s path – that it sometimes went before Neptune or after it. Indeed, that’s what Pluto does in its erratic orbit: it sometimes comes between Uranus and Neptune and is therefore described as two-faced – today it’s facing Neptune only and next time around it’s facing both Neptune and Uranus at the same time. Alalu also records that Pluto had a “leaning gait”. This, again, is scientifically correct, as Pluto is the only one of the familiar nine planets that has an elliptical as opposed to a circular orbit.  

Having encountered Pluto first and not Neptune as would possibly have been the case, Alalu took this to be a harbinger of good luck. “Its appearance as first to greet Alalu as a good omen he at once considered,” notes Enki. “By the celestial gods (planets) he is welcomed! So was his understanding!”  Next to heave in view was Neptune. Alalu was mesmerised by its beauty. “Blue as pure water was her hue”.  That is exactly how Neptune was photographed by the space probe Voyager 2 in 1986.  

After Neptune came AN (Uranus). Alalu described  Uranus as “ANTU’s spouse double, by a greenish blueness was AN distinguished.” If you recall, the planets were originally named by King Enshar, Nibiru’s sixth ruler. He named Uranus and Neptune after Sirius’ first King and Queen under male rule.  The naming was fitting, as Uranus and Neptune are almost identical in virtually every respect – size, colour, watery content, day-length of 16/17 hours respectively, etc.       Voyager 2, when it flew by Uranus in 1986, confirmed that the planet was indeed greenish-blue in appearance!

MYSTERY OBJECT ABOUT SATURN

It was when Alalu was coursing past the planet Saturn that he witnessed something that was as enigmatic then as it is today. Saturn, with its ineffably beautiful, colouful rings, is the most spectacular sight in the Solar System.  In his flight, Alalu too noted the planet’s “bright rings of dazzling colours”.   As much as it is delectably beautiful, Saturn is a most sinister planet.  King Enshar had endearingly named the planet ANSHAR, after his father. But the Anunnaki gave it further names, one of which was TARGALLU, meaning “The Great Destroyer”.  

The planet had often been a death trap to the Anunnaki as they sailed through space. Once, Marduk, Enki’s firstborn son, rushed to his father at his base in Eridu, the Anunnaki settlement on Earth, to report that a SHUSAR (spaceship) lost 50 Anunnaki over Saturn. What exactly was the thing about Saturn that was so life-threatening? (Even the Sumerians, the  world’s best known civilisation of old that flourished circa 4000 BC in modern-day  Iraq, associated Saturn with punishment of some kind: they called it KAKSIDI {Weapon of Righteousness} and SIMUTU {He Who For Justice Kills})   

Alalu encountered the portent firsthand. Alalu’s pilots seemed to have slightly miscalculated their trajectory and in interplanetary travel that can make a very huge and disastrous difference. Saturn, ten times Earth’s size and therefore exerting a mighty force of gravity, tugged menacingly at Alalu’s spaceship. It was thanks to his skill as a space navigator that Alalu flew clear of the dragnet. Alalu too was a rocket scientist and was therefore no ordinary intellect. “With great understanding was Alalu endowed,” confirms Enki. “Much knowledge he by learning acquired.” But he wasn’t off the hook yet. This is what happened next: “A sight most awesome then to him appeared: in the faraway heavens the family’s bright star (the Sun) he discerned. A sight most frightening the revelation followed. A giant monster, in its destiny (orbit) moving, upon the Sun a darkening cast; KISHAR its creator swallowed.”

What Alalu saw and deemed “an evil omen” was a UFO so humongous it for a time bloated out the Sun. Alalu thought it was probably a moon of Jupiter (KISHAR) but it appears he was mistaken:   it was actually an artificial UFO. In the scenario referred to above, Marduk had described the monster object that destroyed a manned Anunnaki spaceship as something that “has been created like a weapon; it has charged forward like death.” This, in other words, was a powerful missile that was fired from this same UFO. Something similar, if you recall, was responsible for the shoot-down of   the Phobos spacecraft over Mars in March 1989.

Exactly what was this UFO that Alalu encountered half a million years ago but thankfully lived to tell the story?

ARMSTRONG’S ENCOUNTER WITH THE ANUNNAKI

In his 1986 book, The Ring Makers of Saturn, former NASA  scientist Norma Bergrun revealed that NASA’s Voyager space probes had captured a cigar-shaped craft (as was the UFO that brought down Phobos)  orbiting in Saturn’s rings. The length of the craft was reckoned at half the size of Earth’s diameter – about 6500 km – and large apertures could be seen in the side of the craft.   Bergrun’s revelation was confirmed in the February 1996 issue of Science News, which reported that the “Hubble Space Telescope had photographed a large, elliptical satellite orbiting Saturn’s rings”.  

Who had deployed this “huge satellite” in Saturn’s rings? Of course it was the Anunnaki, but the fact that Alalu was not aware of it meant these Anunnaki were of a particular clique – Nibiru’s Illuminati. Only the Illuminati are capable of feats the rest of the world populace cannot even conceive of. Today, the Anunnaki Illuminati are present on at least three celestial bodies within the ecliptic. These are Mars, the Moon, and Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. The Phobos incident (we featured it in detail in an earlier piece) attested to Anunnaki presence on Mars. Regarding Titan, a leaked CIA document did confirm the presence of extraterrestrials there. The report said  NASA had on November 20 1986 spied a Titan base where “all personnel  observed appeared to be no different than native Earthlings”.   

How about the Moon? Well, Neil Armstrong, the first Earthling to step on its surface (the official version), revealed a few years ago that the Apollo 11 team found Aliens already established on the Moon, who “warned us to keep away”. Asked what he meant by “warned us”, Armstrong said, “I can’t go into details except to say that their spaceships were far superior to ours  both in size and technology!”   You can also watch Edwin “Buzz’ Aldrin, Armstrong’s deputy on the Apollo 11 flight, explain that their spaceship was followed as they headed toward the  moon here:  HYPERLINK "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7RUwbqrO08" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7RUwbqrO08

Aldrin says Armstrong did not wish to relay the sighting of a stalking UFO to Mission Control back home for fear that they would get alarmed and begin to panic.  

The world has been kept in the dark about what exactly transpired on the Moon during the Apollo missions thanks to a deliberate “CIA cover-up,” Armstrong regretted. This Earth, My Brother…  

Continue Reading

Columns

Chronic Joblessness: How to Help Curtail it

30th November 2020
Motswana woman

The past week or two has been a mixed grill of briefs in so far as the national employment picture is concerned. BDC just injected a further P64 million in Kromberg & Schubert, the automotive cable manufacturer and exporter, to help keep it afloat in the face of the COVID-19-engendered global economic apocalypse. The financial lifeline, which follows an earlier P36 million way back in 2017, hopefully guarantees the jobs of 2500, maybe for another year or two.

It was also reported that a bulb manufacturing company, which is two years old and is youth-led, is making waves in Selibe Phikwe. Called Bulb Word, it is the only bulb manufacturing operation in Botswana and employs 60 people. The figure is not insignificant in a town that had 5000 jobs offloaded in one fell swoop when BCL closed shop in 2016 under seemingly contrived circumstances, so that as I write, two or three buyers have submitted bids to acquire and exhume it from its stage-managed grave.

This content is locked

Login To Unlock The Content!

Continue Reading

Columns

The Era of “The Diplomat”

30th November 2020
FATED “JIHADI” JOHN

Youngest Maccabees scion Jonathan takes over after Judas and leads for 18 years

Going hand-in-glove with the politics at play in Judea in the countdown to the AD era, General Atiku, was the contention for the priesthood. You will be aware, General, that politics and religion among the Jews interlocked. If there wasn’t a formal and sovereign Jewish King, there of necessity had to be a High Priest at any given point in time.

Initially, every High Priest was from the tribe of Levi as per the stipulation of the Torah. At some stage, however, colonisers of Judah imposed their own hand-picked High Priests who were not ethnic Levites. One such High Priest was Menelaus of the tribe of Benjamin.

This content is locked

Login To Unlock The Content!

Continue Reading

Columns

Land Board appointments of party activists is political corruption

30th November 2020

Parliament has rejected a motion by Leader of Opposition (LOO) calling for the reversing of the recent appointments of ruling party activists to various Land Boards across the country. The motion also called for the appointment of young and qualified Batswana with tertiary education qualifications.

The ruling party could not allow that motion to be adopted for many reasons discussed below. Why did the LOO table this motion? Why was it negated? Why are Land Boards so important that a ruling party felt compelled to deploy its functionaries to the leadership and membership positions?

Prior to the motion, there was a LOO parliamentary question on these appointments. The Speaker threw a spanner in the works by ruling that availing a list of applicants to determine who qualified and who didn’t would violate the rights of those citizens. This has completely obliterated oversight attempts by Parliament on the matter.

How can parliament ascertain the veracity of the claim without the names of applicants? The opposition seeks to challenge this decision in court.  It would also be difficult in the future for Ministers and government officials to obey instructions by investigative Parliamentary Committees to summon evidence which include list of persons. It would be a bad precedent if the decision is not reviewed and set aside by the Business Advisory Committee or a Court of law.

Prior to independence, Dikgosi allocated land for residential and agricultural purposes. At independence, land tenures in Botswana became freehold, state land and tribal land. Before 1968, tribal land, which is land belonging to different tribes, dating back to pre-independence, was allocated and administered by Dikgosi under Customary Law. Dikgosi are currently merely ‘land overseers’, a responsibility that can be delegated. Land overseers assist the Land Boards by confirming the vacancy or availability for occupation of land applied for.

Post-independence, the country was managed through modern law and customary law, a system developed during colonialism. Land was allocated for agricultural purposes such as ploughing and grazing and most importantly for residential use. Over time some land was allocated for commercial purpose. In terms of the law, sinking of boreholes and development of wells was permitted and farmers had some rights over such developed water resources.

Land Boards were established under Section 3 of the Tribal Land Act of 1968 with the intention to improve tribal land administration. Whilst the law was enacted in 1968, Land Boards started operating around 1970 under the Ministry of Local Government and Lands which was renamed Ministry of Lands and Housing (MLH) in 1999. These statutory bodies were a mechanism to also prune the powers of Dikgosi over tribal land. Currently, land issues fall under the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services.

There are 12 Main Land Boards, namely Ngwato, Kgatleng, Tlokweng, Tati, Chobe, Tawana, Malete, Rolong, Ghanzi, Kgalagadi, Kweneng and Ngwaketse Land Boards.  The Tribal Land Act of 1968 as amended in 1994 provides that the Land Boards have the powers to rescind the grant of any rights to use any land, impose restrictions on land usage and facilitate any transfer or change of use of land.

Some land administration powers have been decentralized to sub land boards. The devolved powers include inter alia common law and customary law water rights and land applications, mining, evictions and dispute resolution. However, decisions can be appealed to the land board or to the Minister who is at the apex.

So, land boards are very powerful entities in the country’s local government system. Membership to these institutions is important not only because of monetary benefits of allowances but also the power of these bodies. in terms of the law, candidates for appointment to Land Boards or Subs should be residents of the tribal areas where appointments are sought, be holders of at least Junior Certificate and not actively involved in politics.  The LOO contended that ruling party activists have been appointed in the recent appointments.

He argued that worse, some had no minimum qualifications required by the law and that some are not inhabitants of the tribal or sub tribal areas where they have been appointed. It was also pointed that some people appointed are septuagenarians and that younger qualified Batswana with degrees have been rejected.

Other arguments raised by the opposition in general were that the development was not unusual. That the ruling party is used to politically motivated appointments in parastatals, civil service, diplomatic missions, specially elected councilors and Members of Parliament (MPs), Bogosi and Land Boards. Usually these positions are distributed as patronage to activists in return for their support and loyalty to the political leadership and the party.

The ruling party contended that when the Minister or the Ministry intervened and ultimately appointed the Land Boards Chairpersons, Deputies and members , he didn’t have information, as this was not information required in the application, on who was politically active and for that reason he could not have known who to not appoint on that basis. They also argued that opposition activists have been appointed to positions in the government.

The counter argument was that there was a reason for the legal requirement of exclusion of political activists and that the government ought to have mechanisms to detect those. The whole argument of “‘we didn’t know who was politically active” was frivolous. The fact is that ruling party activists have been appointed. The opposition also argued that erstwhile activists from their ranks have been recruited through positions and that a few who are serving in public offices have either been bought or hold insignificant positions which they qualified for anyway.

Whilst people should not be excluded from public positions because of their political activism, the ruling party cannot hide the fact that they have used public positions to reward activists. Exclusion of political activists may be a violation of fundamental human or constitutional rights. But, the packing of Land Boards with the ruling party activists is clear political corruption. It seeks to sow divisions in communities and administer land in a politically biased manner.

It should be expected that the ruling party officials applying for land or change of land usage etcetera will be greatly assisted. Since land is wealth, the ruling party seeks to secure resources for its members and leaders. The appointments served to reward 2019 election primary and general elections losers and other activists who have shown loyalty to the leadership and the party.

Running a country like this has divided it in a way that may be difficult to undo. The next government may decide to reset the whole system by replacing many of government agencies leadership and management in a way that is political. In fact, it would be compelled to do so to cleanse the system.

The opposition is also pondering on approaching the courts for review of the decision to appoint party functionaries and the general violation of clearly stated terms of reference. If this can be established with evidence, the courts can set aside the decision on the basis that unqualified people have been appointed.

The political activism aspect may also not be difficult to prove as some of these people are known activists who are in party structures, at least at the time of appointment, and some were recently candidates. There is a needed for civil society organizations such as trade unions and political parties to fight some of these decisions through peaceful protests and courts.

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!