Recent conflicts within the Botswana Movement for Democracy (BMD), which may inevitably spill over to the Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC), have compelled me to break from the series ‘Remembering the unwanted’ to which I will return next week.
For some time now there has been conflict within the BMD. At some point in time, the BMD Youth League was tearing itself apart, with warring factions reportedly aligned to the two factions within the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC).
Then there was the issue of Advocate Sidney Pilane’s application for readmission into the party which was surprisingly met with fierce resistance by some within party. Seemingly, it is this issue, especially after his application was accepted by the Mochudi West constituency, which has brought so much unrest within the party, with some calling for the expulsion of the party Secretary General, Honourable Gilbert Mangole.
The issue of Pilane’s re-admission has gone out of hand to the extent that the party has to go for a Special Congress mainly for it. It is unprecedented for a party to call a Special Congress to determine an individual’s application to rejoin the party, let alone one who is its founding Vice President. But not even the imminence of the Special Congress has brought calm within the party.
Reportedly, the pro Pilane faction wants the party Vice President, Honourable Wynter Mmolotsi, to be expelled for causing instability within the party. According to Mmegi’s online edition of 1st June 2016, “…the pro Pilane team is not happy that the anti-Pilane team is using the current President and Vice President’s tour and rallies to canvass support from members.”
They dismiss the claim that the party President and Vice President’s tour is meant to inform members about what led to the collapse of the party’s NEC, saying that could be done during the impending Special Congress were all NEC members will be present to set the record straight should there be a misrepresentation of facts.
Mmegi’s report further states that “the pro-Pilane team also wants the Member of Parliament (MP) for Mogoditshane, Honourable Sedirwa Kgoroba, to be suspended from the party for continuing his attack on other party members on social media…”
This is surprising because the very pro-Pilane faction is said to be preaching reconciliation while the anti-Pilane group is said to be adamant that only a Special Congress can effectively resolve the impasse within the party which has resulted in the NEC being moribund.
My fear is that if the BMD conflict is not well managed it will affect the UDC. Inevitably, some of the UDC’s other members, the Botswana National Front (BNF) and Botswana People’s Party (BPP), may, for political expediency, align with the BMD’s warring factions, something which can only exacerbate the conflict.
Not only that. The BMD’s conflict has delayed the Opposition’s cooperation talks which were supposed to start in April 2016. Reportedly, the anti-Pilane faction has objected to Pilane being part of the negotiation team, calling for vetting of members of the negotiation team, something which will take time, especially considering the current impasse within the BMD’s NEC.
The BMD conflicts are fodder for those within the BNF, BPP and the Botswana Congress Party (BCP) who are against cooperation. They will use it to justify their view that working with other parties may bring instability to their own parties, further diminishing their chances of success during the 2019 general elections.
This is worsened by the fact that many within the BNF and BCP do not really trust the BMD since it is ideologically closer to the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) than it is to them. In fact, some believe that many in the BMD are likely to defect to the BDP should political dynamics shift in the BDP’s favour.
The BMD conflicts are even more fodder for the BDP. The BDP has always used the propaganda that Batswana should not vote for the Opposition since opposition parties are prone to conflict. It has warned the voter that if any of the opposition parties were to be elected to government Botswana will lose the peace and stability it is internationally acclaimed for.
Many Batswana, especially the elderly, the illiterate and those who live in rural areas have bought into this propaganda. Several of them, especially those who remember the BNF split, have started citing the BMD conflict as the reason why the Opposition cannot be trusted with governing the country.
Prior to the BDP’s split which resulted in the BMD’s formation, the BDP boasted of being the only political party in Botswana which has not suffered a split since independence. It cited with relish the BNF split which led to the formation of the BCP. But, that changed when it suffered the split which resulted in BMD’s formation.
In the face of the conflicts engulfing its offspring, the BMD, the BDP is embarking on a two pronged propaganda offensive. On the one hand it is using the conflict to prove that the blame for the split is not at its door step, but at the door step of those who defected, especially the leaders. Incidentally, and conveniently for the BDP, it is these leaders who form the embattled BMD’s NEC.
On the other hand, the BDP is appealing to those in the BMD to rejoin the BDP by telling them that they can never survive in the Opposition. They tell them that because of ideological differences they can never belong with such leftist diehards as the BMD’s Chairperson, Nehemiah Modubule, who was a member of the BNF for most of his life.
In the 2014 general elections, the BDP seats in the National Assembly fell from 45 in 2009 to 37 in 2014. Its popular vote declined from 53.26% in 2009 to 46.7% in 2014. While this was an indication that the BDP could lose power in 2019, the BMD’s conflicts, especially if they can spill over to the UDC and the BCP, are putting that in doubt.
This conflict, coupled with the conflict between the Botswana Federation of Public Service Unions (BOFEPUSU) and Botswana Public Employees Union (BOPEU) as well as the apparent divisions on opposition cooperation within the BCP, can deny Batswana a once in a lifetime opportunity to experience a change of government.
It will be remembered that even prior to these conflict the BDP had begun a charm offensive to regain its voters, especially in relation to public servants. It came up with so-called initiatives which include an increase in the repayment period for Government Employees Motor Vehicle and Residential Property Advance Scheme (GEMVAS) housing loan from 10 years to 20 years.
In addition, it claims to have introduced free rent for employees in Category 1 Remote Area Service Allowance (RASA) earning areas; free internet and a special Self Help Housing Agency (SHHA) scheme for public servants of grade D4 and below; and allowing Public Servants to engage in private businesses.
Also, government claims that in order to encourage a culture of saving among public servants, it initiated the Botswana Public Officers Savings and Credit Cooperative Society which was registered in April 2013. Its latest charm offensive was the introduction of the Economic Stimulus Package (ESP).
The UDC, therefore, has to assist the BMD to emerge from this conflict as quickly as possible to avoid further damage, lest the conflict, BOFEPUSU and BOPEU’s war and the BDP’s undeniable revival become the BDP’s live line in 2019.
We have come a long way from the 19th century, when mental un-healthiness was not recognised as treatable. In those days mental health problems were viewed as a sign of madness, warranting imprisonment in often merciless and unhygienic conditions; and with that backdrop you would think twice before calling in sick because of stress or admit feelings of hopelessness or depression but that‚Äôs changing. That may sound like good news but it‚Äôs not.
Reasons why employees don‚Äôt show up for work can vary, but one thing is for certain; an organisation relies on its staff to get things done and when employees don‚Äôt show up for work it disrupts organisational plans, takes up the valuable time from management and lowers the company‚Äôs productivity.¬†It‚Äôs always been that people miss work for several reasons, some understandable and legitimate and others less so but it‚Äôs important that we know the reasons so that such situations can be better managed.
Today stress is one of the most common causes of long-term absence and is especially prevalent amongst office-based staff.¬†This is also related to absence due to depression or anxiety. Is this indicative of where we are as a society, a sign of the times which is that people are constantly pressurised and have less work-life balance?
The British Museum houses a tablet which provides a peek into work-life balance in ancient Egypt. It documents how many sick days and why 40 workers took time off from their workplace in 1250 BC. All sorts of fascinating reasons have been given for why people were away from their work, including a note about someone named Buqentuf, who needed time off for embalming and wrapping the corpse of his dead mother.
There were other reasons like some workers, such as a man named Pennub, missed work because their mothers were ill. ¬†Others had causes that we wouldn‚Äôt expect to hear as often today, such as men who stayed home to help around the house due to a ‚Äúwife or daughter bleeding‚ÄĚ – a reference to menstruation. But no mention of mental health, not because it didn‚Äôt exist, but it wasn‚Äôt labelled thus not reported.
What was reported was a person such as Aapehti who was said to have been ill on a regular basis and also took time off when he was ‚Äúmaking offerings to god‚ÄĚ. ¬†Workers also took days off when they had to perform tasks for their superiors ‚Äď which was apparently permitted in moderate amounts. For example, Amenmose was allowed time away from work when he was ‚Äúfetching stones for the scribe: ¬†And what about other employees who had to excuse themselves from work to brew beer, an activity which was associated with some of their gods and rituals.
All fascinating stuff which provides insight into life at that time. But what insights can we gather from today‚Äôs sick leave records? One study recently undertaken gives us insight into the UK police force‚Äôs absenteeism. Figures obtained through the Freedom of Information Act from police forces in the UK showed that the number of days absent due to mental health problems increased by 9% in one year, from 457,154 in 2020 to 497,154 in 2021.
And here is the shocker. Police¬†have taken a record 500,000 days off due to mental health issues. Zoe Billingham, a former police inspector, suggested there was a greater prevalence of mental health issues among emergency services, due to what they faced during the pandemic of coronavirus. ‚ÄúPolice and other frontline services have protected us during the pandemic,‚ÄĚ she said. ‚ÄúThe pandemic was a great unknown. People were really scared of dying and coming into contact with the virus, and a lot of people did.‚ÄĚ
It is a ‚Äėmental health epidemic‚Äô among police. Alistair Carmichael, Home Affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, said: ‚ÄúFrontline police officers do an incredible job serving their communities. But we know that the stress of policing can take a heavy toll on the mental health of officers, in some cases leading to burnout.
Let‚Äôs look at another group. A poll by Gallup reported that in the last three years, 75% of young adults aged 18‚Äď22 have left their jobs because of stated mental health reasons.¬†This study showed that employees (millennials and Gen Z) want employers who care about their wellbeing. Contributing factors to mental health stress centre around increases in uncertainty and include: Hybrid work environments and the side-effects: no socialization, no end time, no feedback, caring for others; changing rules around work often with poor communications & clarity; ¬†inconsistency & incompleteness of rule implementation:¬† Uncertainty from these and other factors leads to anxiety and depression.
The real story here is not that burnout, stress, depression and anxiety are becoming the number one reasons for absenteeism but that for a large part they are preventable. We have the data telling us it‚Äôs the problem but still organisations are doing very little to proactively manage it. Sure, we have counselling services for staff who are struggling and wellness days to reinforce feelings of wellbeing, but this is not enough.
If we start caring and developing work cultures that do not create unintentional stress through how work gets done, that will go a long way to change the status quo. Simple things like ensuring your culture doesn‚Äôt thrive on fire drills and heroics to get things done and that emails do not come with expected responses after hours or over the weekend. If we can stop managers bullying, yelling or losing their cool when there is a performance or customer issue and begin giving people more control over their work – all of these are the kinds of stuff that contribute to weakened mental health and absenteeism.
To sum up, your staff‚Äôs stress levels are directly proportional to your business‚Äôs absentee levels.¬† Ergo, lowering the former, will also reduce the latter.¬† Stress down, productivity up and everybody wins out.
Contributing factors to mental health stress centre around increases in uncertainty and include: Hybrid work environments and the side-effects: no socialization, no end time, no feedback, caring for others; changing rules around work often with poor communications & clarity; ¬†inconsistency & incompleteness of rule implementation:¬† Uncertainty from these and other factors leads to anxiety and depression.
In September 1978, General Atiku, Princess Diana had enrolled for a cookery course. That same month whilst she was staying at her parents‚Äô home in Norfolk, her friends innocently asked about the health of her father¬† John Spencer, the 8th Earl. Hitherto, the Earl‚Äôs health had never been a matter of concern but Diana somewhat inscrutably voiced a somewhat portendous outlook. ‚ÄúHe‚Äôs going to drop down in some way,‚ÄĚ she said.¬† ‚ÄúIf he dies, he will die immediately; ¬†otherwise he‚Äôll survive.‚ÄĚ¬†¬†
It came to pass, ¬†General. The following day, the telephone bell rang to the news that her father had collapsed in the courtyard of his Althorp Estate residence and that he had been rushed to a nearby hospital after suffering a massive cerebral haemorrhage. The medical prognosis was bleak: ¬†Earl Spencer was not expected to survive the night. Writes Andrew Morton in Diana Her True Story: ‚ÄúFor two days the children camped out in the hospital waiting-room as their father clung on to life. When doctors announced that there was a glimmer of hope, Raine [second wife] organised a private ambulance to take him to the National Hospital for Nervous Diseases in Queen Square, Central London, where for several months he lay in a coma.‚ÄĚ
Raine was so fiercely protective of her beloved husband that she had the nurses see to it that his own children did not come near him in this critical condition in his elitist private room. ¬†‚ÄėI‚Äôm a survivor and people forget that at their peril,‚ÄĚ she would later tell a journalist. ‚ÄúThere‚Äôs pure steel up my backbone. Nobody destroys me, and nobody was going to destroy Johnnie so long as I could sit by his bed ‚Äď some of his family tried to stop me ‚Äď and will my life force into him.‚ÄĚ But if Raine had steel in her, General, so did the implacable Spencer children, more so the eldest of them all.¬† ‚ÄúDuring this critical time,‚ÄĚ Morton goes on, ‚Äúthe ill feeling between Raine and the children boiled over into a series of vicious exchanges. There was iron too in the Spencer soul and numerous hospital corridors rang to the sound of the redoubtable Countess and the fiery Lady Sarah Spencer [the Earl‚Äôs firstborn child] hissing at each other like a pair of angry geese.‚ÄĚ
As Diana had correctly predicted, her father was not destined to die at that juncture but healthwise he was never the same henceforth. First, he suffered a relapse in November that same year and was moved to another hospital. Once again, he teetered on the brink. He was drifting in and out of consciousness and as such he was not able to properly process ¬†people who were visiting him, including his own daughters when nurses relented and allowed them in. Even when he was awake a feeding tube in his throat meant that he was unable to speak. Understandably, Diana found it hard to concentrate on the cookery course she had enrolled in a few days before her father suffered his stroke.
But Raine, General,¬† was determined that her husband survive come rain or shine. Morton: ‚ÄúWhen his doctors were at their most pessimistic, Raine‚Äôs will-power won through. She had heard of a German drug called Aslocillin which she thought could help and so she pulled every string to find a supply. It was unlicensed in Britain but that didn‚Äôt stop her. The wonder drug was duly acquired and miraculously did the trick. One afternoon she was maintaining her usual bedside vigil when, with the strains of Madam Butterfly playing in the background, he opened his eyes ‚Äėand was back‚Äô. In January 1979, when he was finally released from hospital, he and Raine booked into the Dorchester Hotel in Park Lane for an expensive month-long convalescence. Throughout this episode the strain on the family was intense.‚ÄĚ
Altogether, Earl Spencer had been in hospital for 8 straight months. The lingering effects of the stroke left him somewhat unsteady on his feet when he escorted his daughter down the aisle at St. Paul’s Cathedral in 1981 for her marriage to the Prince of Wales.
R.I.P. EARL SPENCER
It was not until March 29, 1992, General, that Earl Spencer finally gave up the ghost. He was admitted in hospital for pneumonia but what killed him days later was a heart attack. Rumours of his death actually began to make the rounds the day before he passed on. At the time, Diana was on a skiing holiday in the¬† Austrian Alps along with¬† her estranged hubby Prince Charles and their two kids William and Harry.
When Diana was told of her dad‚Äôs death, she insisted that under no circumstances would she return to England on the same flight as Charles, with whom she was barely on talking terms. ‚ÄúI mean it, Ken,‚ÄĚ she told her body minder Ken Wharfe. ‚ÄúI don‚Äôt want him with me. He doesn‚Äôt love me ‚Äď he loves that woman [Camilla]. Why should I help save his face? Why the bloody hell should I? It‚Äôs my father who has gone. It‚Äôs a bit bloody late for Charles to start playing the caring husband, don‚Äôt you think so?‚ÄĚ
Naturally, General, Charles was alarmed, particularly that his efforts to use one of his right-hand-men to reason with the Princess had been rebuffed. He therefore¬† prevailed over Wharfe to try and ram sense into his wife. ‚ÄúLord Spencer‚Äôs death was a major news story,‚ÄĚ writes Ken Wharfe, ¬†‚Äúand if the Prince and Princess did not return to Britain together then nothing, not even compassion for the grief-stricken Diana, would stop the journalists from going for the jugular. The truth about the Waleses would be immediately and blindingly obvious to the most naive journalist ‚Ä¶ Returning to the Princess‚Äôs room, I told her bluntly that this was not a matter for debate. ‚ÄėMa‚Äôam, you have to go back with the Prince. This one is not open for discussion. You just have to go with it‚Äô.‚Äô‚Äô
At long last persuaded, General, Diana said, ‚ÄúOkay Ken, I‚Äôll do it. Tell him I‚Äôll do it, but it is for my father, not for him ‚Äď it is out of loyalty to my father.‚ÄĚ But what in truth got Diana to change tack was the intervention of the Queen, who personally called her at Charles‚Äô own request. That, however, General, was only as far as Diana was prepared to play ball: as far as engaging with Charles in conversation was concerned, that was simply inconceivable. ‚ÄúThere was an icy silence for the rest of the two-hour journey,‚ÄĚ writes Wharfe. ‚ÄúNothing was said during the entire flight. The Princess did not want to speak to her husband and he, fearing a furious or even hysterical outburst, did not dare even to try to start a conversation. Whatever the discomforts of the journey, however, it was soon clear that the PR spin had worked. The next day it was reported that Prince Charles was at Diana‚Äôs side in her hour of need. Yet as soon as the Prince and Princess arrived at Kensington Palace they went their separate ways ‚Äď he to Highgrove, and she to pay her last respects to her father.‚ÄĚ
Lord Spencer was 68 when he died. He was a remote descendant of King Henry VIII.
PRINCE CHARLES FINALLY OWNS UP TO ADULTERY WITH CAMILLA
In June 1994, when Diana and Charles had been separated for exactly one-and-half years, Prince Charles was interviewed in a BBC documentary by Jonathan Dimbleby. The interview was billed as intended to mark Charles‚Äô 25 anniversary as Prince of Wales but it was in truth a not-to-cleverly-disguised riposte to Diana Her True Story, the highly controversial 1992 collaboration between Diana and Andrew Morton.
In the interview, which was watched by 13 million people, Charles, General, openly admitted for the first time that he had committed adultery with Camilla Parker-Bowles, who he hailed as, ‚Äúa great friend of mine who has been a friend for a very long time and will continue to be a friend for a very long time‚ÄĚ. Diana had been requested to feature in the interview alongside her husband but she parried the overture on the advice of her aides, which was spot-on as she would have been greatly embarrassed by her hubby‚Äôs unsavoury confession in her own face and on national television.
The Prince‚Äôs candid confessional was followed weeks later by a book titled The¬† Prince of Wales: A Biography, which was written by the same Jonathan Dimbleby. The book was even frankier than the interview. In it, Charles put it bluntly that she had never once loved Diana and that he married her only because he was coerced into doing so by his ¬†notoriously overbearing father. Charles also made it known that as a child, he had been bullied by his abusive father, virtually ignored by his mother, and persecuted by a wife he portrayed as both spoiled and mentally unstable. ¬†¬†Both Diana and his parents were revolted by the bare-knuckle ¬†contents of the book though Dana need not have been irked considering that it was she herself who had fired the first salvo in the Morton book.
BASHIR INTERVIEW BODES ILL FOR DIANA
If Diana‚Äôs collaboration with Morton was a miscalculation, General, Prince Charles‚Äô Dimbleby interview was equally so. For in November 1995, the wayward Princess hit back with her own tell-all interview on BBC‚Äôs¬† current affairs programme called Panorama. ‚ÄúShe wanted to get even with Prince Charles over his adulterous confession with the Dimbleby documentary,‚ÄĚ writes Paul Burrell, her final butler, in A Royal Duty.
The interview was conducted by journalist Martin Bashir who was attached to BBC, and was watched by 23 million people,¬† conferring it the distinction of having attracted the largest audience for any television documentary in broadcasting history. In the interview, Diana voiced concern about there having been ‚Äúthree of us in this marriage and so it was¬† a bit crowded‚ÄĚ, the intruder obviously being Camilla. Diana also gave Charles a dose of his own medicine by confessing to her own adulterous relationship with James Hewitt, of whom she said, ‚ÄúYes, I adored him, yes, I was in love with him‚ÄĚ. Hewitt had at the time documented his affair with Diana in lurid detail in a best-selling book and Diana thought he had ill-conceivedly stabbed her in the back.
And as if to rub salt into the wound, General, Diana cast serious ¬†doubts on her husband‚Äôs fitness to rule as future King and therefore his eventual accession to the British throne. ¬†¬†Unfortunately for her, the interview sealed her fate ¬†in so far as her marriage was concerned. ‚ÄúIn her headstrong decision to co-operate with Bashir,‚ÄĚ says Burrell, ‚Äúshe had never considered, perhaps naively, the implications that Panorama had for her marriage.‚ÄĚ Indeed, just four weeks after the interview, the Queen, after consultation with the Prime Minister and the Archbishop of Canterbury, wrote personally to both the Prince and Princess of Wales requesting that they divorce sooner rather than later.
It was a dream-come-true for at least two parties to the triangle, namely Charles and Camilla. But did it also constitute music to the ears of Princess Diana too, General?
SOWING THE WIND ONLY TO REAP THE WHIRLWIND: Martin Bashir interviews Princess Diana in a BBC documentary which aired on Monday 29 November 1995. The interview incensed the Windsors: the following month, Queen Elizabeth ordered Charles and Diana to sever matrimonial ties. In her vengeful resolve to hit back at her husband following his own interview the previous year, Diana had foolishly sown the wind and reaped the whirlwind.
Islam is a way of life completed and perfected by the last and final Messenger of Allah, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). The Holy Quran along with the practical teachings of the Prophet (pbuh) forms the basis of Islamic law, social, economic and political systems of Islam ‚Äď in short the basis of a complete code of conduct for the entire life of a Muslim
Regrettably in this day and age there are certain views in non-Muslims that have a very negative ‚Äėview‚Äô of Islam. The bottom line is that if a Muslim says that two plus two is four, others can ‚Äėargue‚Äô to say three plus one is four, or two times two is four or the square root of 16 is four. The bottom line is no matter what we may think we all are ‚Äėcorrect‚Äô. The fact is that we are all on this earth for a ‚Äėlimited‚Äô time. Regardless of beliefs, tribe, race, colour or our social standing in life, we will all die one day or the other and we will ‚Äúall‚ÄĚ be called up thereafter to answer for our behaviour, beliefs, and our life on this earth.
To a Muslim the Holy Quran is the Divine Revelation which is all encompassing and lays down in clear terms, how we should live our daily lives including the need for humans to allow fellow humans certain basic rights at all times. Due to the limited space available I can only reflect on some of the major fundamental rights laid down by Islam:
Right to life
The first and foremost of fundamental basic human-rights is the right to life. ‚ÄúWhosoever kills any human being (without any valid reason) like manslaughter or any disruption and chaos on earth, it is though he had killed all the mankind. And whoever saves a life it is though as he had saved the lives of all mankind‚ÄĚ (Quran Ch5: v 32). It further declares: ‚ÄúDo not kill a soul which Allah has made sacred except through the due process of law‚ÄĚ (Quran Ch6: v 151). Islam further explains that this sacrosanct right to life is not granted only to its adherents (believers), but it has been granted to all human beings without consideration of their religion, race, colour or sex
Right to Equality¬†
The Holy Quran recognises equality between humans irrespective of any distinction of nationality, race, colour or gender. ‚ÄúO Mankind We have created you from a male and female, and We made you as nations and tribes so that you may be able to recognise each other (not that you may despise each other). Indeed the most honourable among you before God is the most God-conscious‚ÄĚ. (Quran Ch49: v 13). The Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) further explained this: ‚ÄúNo Arab has any superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab…… You are all the children of Adam and Adam was created from soil‚ÄĚ. If there is any superiority for a man it is based on his piety, righteousness, sense of responsibility and character. Even such a person with these noble qualities would not have any privileged rights over others.
Right to justice
Allah Almighty has bestowed on all human beings, believer or non-believer, friend or foe the right to justice.¬† The Holy Quran states: ‚ÄúWe sent our messengers with clear teachings and sent down along with them the Book and the Balance so that society may be established on the basis of justice‚ÄĚ (Quran Ch 57 : v 25). It further says ‚ÄúO Believers stand for the cause of God and as witness to justice and remember that enmity of some people should not lead you to injustice. Be just as it is nearest to God consciousness‚ÄĚ (Quran Ch 5:v¬† 8 ). This makes it obligatory that a believer must uphold justice in all circumstances, including to his enemies.
Right to freedom of conscience and religion
The Holy Quran clearly mentions that there is no compulsion in accepting or rejecting a religion. ‚ÄúThere is no compulsion in (submitting to) the religion‚ÄĚ (Quran Ch 2 : v 256). Every individual has been granted basic freedom to accept a religion of his or her choice. Therefore no religion should be imposed on a person.
Right to personal freedom
No person can be deprived of his or her personal freedom except in pursuance of justice. Therefore there cannot be any arbitrary or preventive arrest without the permission of duly appointed judge and in the light of a solid proof.
Right to Protection of Honour
Every person has been ensured basic human dignity which should not be violated. If someone falsely attacks the honour of a person the culprit will be punished according to the Islamic Law. The Holy Quran says: ‚ÄúDo not let one group of people make fun of another group‚ÄĚ. It further states: ‚ÄúDo not defame one another‚ÄĚ, the Quran goes on to say: And do not backbite or speak ill of one another‚ÄĚ (Quran Ch 49¬† : v 11-12).