They are Earth’s senior citizenry and not us humans
About 65 million years ago, a global war arose on planet Earth. The two belligerents were not Earthlings at all: they were from other parts of the universe and were of different races.
One race was from the Procyon star system. It was humanoid, exactly as we are. Procyon is a binary star system, meaning it comprises of two suns – Procyon A, the main star, and Procyon B, a white dwarf. Procyon A is 1.42 times larger than our Sun and is about 12 light years from Earth. It is one of the ten brightest stars in the evening sky. The humanoids in question came from the fourth planet in Procyon A’s planetary system. They were tall, blonde-haired, and blue-eyed.
The other race was Reptilian. It was from Alpha Draconis (also known as Thuban), another binary star system in the Draco constellation which is 3.5 times our Sun’s size and 300 light years from Earth. The Reptilians came from a planet called Tiphon, the fourth in order of orbit.
The clash between the two foreign races was the first global war on our planet.
The first to arrive were the humanoids. When they so did, they established two colonies on Earth, one on the continent we today call Antarctica and another on the continent we today call Asia. This was at a time when the Earth’s land mass was essentially one whole, the so-called Pangea. The land mass had already cracked and the continents had drifted from each other but not to the extent they have today: they were much closer. It was a time when dinosaurs and other giant reptiles roamed the Earth.
About 150 years later, the Reptilians from Alpha Draconis touched down on the planet. Just like the humanoids, the Reptilians had come to Earth to look for one very vital commodity – copper. In the annals of Earth’s history, copper has been vastly underrated (maybe deliberately so) but it has a host of key uses most Earthlings are not aware of that make it a highly-sought-after metal by advanced races from other worlds. Our planet was, and still is to some degree, very rich in copper, one of the reasons it has been a magnet for ETs.
Reptilians are a very pugnacious and violent-prone race, particularly versus humanoids. Whilst the humanoids were prepared to co-exist with the Reptilians, the latter were not interested. They wanted to rule the planet and make the humanoids subject to them irrespective of the fact that the humanoids were the pioneers. The humanoids told them to go get stuffed and war broke out. It was a high-tech war which was mostly fought in the higher reaches of the sky and in orbit.
Initially, the humanoids had the upper hand: they were very good at conventional warfare and therefore inflicted substantial casualties amongst the enemy ranks. Fearing decimation and possible annihilation, the Reptilians, who are the oldest race in our universe and therefore the most advanced technologically, decided to employ an experimental, non-conventional weapon whose exact consequences they were not even sure of.
The weapon was a special kind of fusion bomb and was meant to destroy life but leave raw materials intact in the Earth’s crust. It was fired from space and detonated somewhere around the Bermuda Triangle in Middle America. The result was so catastrophic even the Reptilians regretted having used the weapon just as Americans continue to regret having used the atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The radiation from the bomb was so phenomenal that the humanoids were practically wiped out, with the few survivors hastily beating a path back to Procyon, and much of animal life, which included the dinosaurs, perished partly from the immediate effects of the detonation but mostly from the nuclear winter that resultantly engulfed the planet and lasted for more than 200 years. The dinosaurs actually became extinct within 20 years. Forget about the oft-pedalled and now ingrained lie that it was a meteor or asteroid impact that wiped off the dinosaurs. It was not. It was a Reptilian-made fusion bomb. One of the fallouts from this same fusion bomb was the coming into being of new elements such as iridium for instance.
Having messed up the planet, the Reptilians took to their celestial boats and sailed back to Alpha Draconis. For the next 200 to 300 years, no outsiders showed interest in the wasteland and hazardous place that now was Earth.
EARTH’S FIRST GLOBAL WAR
In every cataclysm though, not all life goes into oblivion. Some animals survived the fusion bomb holocaust. They included fish species such as sharks; little creepy mammals (our ancestors); crocodiles; and some other small reptiles. One of the surviving reptiles resembled what scientists call an Iguanodon, which had developed alongside the creature we now call Tyrannosaurus Rex.
Although this 1.5 metre tall creature was a pure reptile organically, some of its external features looked mammalian. The creature was able to walk on two legs and grab things. This creature proceeded to evolve and in the span of about 30 million years (evolution is so glacially slow), it was able to think more or less rationally, living in caves instead of the open air, using branches and stones as tools, and making fire to protect itself from the cold.
During the next 20 million years, nature divided this reptile into 27 sub-species. In the course of time, 24 of these species ceased to exist owing to primitive wars of dominance among themselves and natural attrition occasioned by evolution itself. Thus 50 million years after the Reptilian-Humanoid war and the extinction of dinosaurs, only 3 Earth-bred Reptilian species remained. These were very technologically advanced and had reached a stage of sophistication beyond where we humans are at today. Being so thoroughly versed in genetic engineering, the three species decided to merge into one through natural and artificial cross-breeding on the one hand and self-induced genetic manipulation on the other.
The resultant, unified species was able to eliminate from its genome the dividing-prone genes so that it could retain its identity indefinitely. At this juncture, which was 10 million years ago, this unitary Reptilian species ceased to evolve physically. The only minor changes that have taken place in the intervening period relate to the aspect of its looking more humanoid and mammalian-like in outward appearance as every other species does in the fullness of time. Otherwise, the species has not sub-divided.
This Reptilian species was the first civilisation to evolve on our planet and now resides under the surface of the Earth (at a depth of about 2 to 8 km) in inconceivably sophisticated cities.
In December 1999, a young Reptilian female emerged from this subterranean society and gave a now famous interview to a Swede who lived in an isolated cottage in southern Sweden. Her name was "Sssshiaassshakkkasskkhhhshhh" but she opted to be simply called Larceta, which is Latin for “Lizard”. She said she was 28 years old and was a social scientist with a keen interest in terrestrial civilisations.
“We live in large and advanced cities and colonies,” she told the bemused Swedish recluse. “Major sites of us are beyond the Arctic, the Antarctica, Inner Asia, North America, and Australia.” She confided that the entry points to the Reptilian underground dwellings were usually found inside caves but were not easy to spot by humans because their doors were fitted with a device that made humans see an ordinary cave wall and not the door itself. This device sent a scrambling signal to the human mind.
Larceta was interviewed on two occasions. At first, she appeared just like a normal human being. In a subsequent session, however, she presented herself in her true Reptilian form, which scared the daylights out of the Swede. The human form, she said, was an optical illusion she implanted in the minds of humans by telepathy, using a biological switch we have somewhere inside our brain which was deliberately installed by the Anunnaki when they genetically upgraded us about 40,000 years ago.
THE ANATOMY OF INDIGENOUS REPTILIANS
How do the Reptilians indigenous to Earth look like? The following is how Larceta described the physical characteristics of her race to the Swedish recluse:
“Imagine the body of a normal human woman and you have at first a good imagination of my body. Like you, I have a head, two arms, two hands, two legs and two feet and the proportions of my body are like yours. As I’m female, I have also two breasts (despite our reptile origin, we have had to start to give milk to our babies during the evolution process — this happened around 30 million years ago — because this is the best thing to keep the young alive. Evolution had done this for your species already in the dinosaur age and — a little bit later — also for ours. That does not mean we are now real mammals.) but our breasts are not as large as those of human women and their size is generally equal for every female of my kind.
“The external reproduction organs are for both sexes smaller than those of humans, but they are visible and they have the same function as yours (another gift of evolution to our species).
“My skin is mainly of a green-beige colour – more pale green – and we have some patterns of brown irregular dots (each dot of the size of 1 – 2 centimeters) on our skin and on our face (the patterns are different for both sexes but females have more, especially in the lower body and in the face). You can see them in my case as two lines over the eyebrows crossing my forehead, at my cheek and at my chin.
“My eyes are a little bit larger than human eyes (for this reason, we can see better in the darkness) and usually dominated by large black pupils, which are surrounded by a small bright-green iris (males have a dark-green iris). The pupil is slit and can change its size from a small black line to a wide-open egg-shaped oval, because our retina is very light sensitive and the pupil must facilitate this.
“We have external round ears but they are smaller and not as curved as yours though we can hear better because our ears are more sensitive for sonic (we can also hear a wider range of sonic). There’s a muscle or "lid" over the ears which can completely close them (for example under water).
“Our nose is more pointed and there is a V-shaped curving between the nostrils, which enabled the ancestors to ‘see’ temperature. We have lost most of this ability, but we can still feel temperature much better with this ‘organ’.
“Our lips are shaped like yours (those of females a little bit larger than those of males) but of a pale brown colour and our teeth are very white and strong and a little bit longer and sharper than your soft mammal teeth.
“We have no different hair colours like you (but there is a tradition to colour the hairs in different ages) and the original colour is —like mine— a greenish brown. Our hairs are thicker and stronger than yours and they grow very slowly. In addition, the head is the only part of our body where we have hairs.
“Our body, arms and legs are similar in shape and size to yours, but the colour is different (green-beige, like the face) and there are scale-like structures on the upper legs (over the knee) and upper arms (over the elbow).
“Our five fingers are a little bit longer and thinner than human fingers and our skin on the palm is plain, so we have no lines like you but again a combination of a scale-like skin structure and of the brown dots (both sexes have the dots on the palm) and we have no fingerprints like you. If you touch my skin, you will feel that it is smoother than your hairy skin. There are small sharp horns on the upside of both middle fingers. The fingernails are grey and generally longer than yours. You see that my nails are not so long and round at the top. This is because I’m female. Males have sharp pointed nails with a length of sometimes 5 or 6 of your centimeters.
“The following feature is very different from your body and is part of our reptilian origin: if you touch the backside of my upper body, you will feel a hard bony line through my clothing. This is not my spine but a very difficult shaped external plate-structure of skin and tissue following exactly our spine from the head to the hip. There is an extremely high number of nerves and large blood vessels in this structure and in the plates (which are around two or three centimeters long and very touch sensitive (this is the reason why we always have problems sitting in chairs with a back like this chair).
“The main task of these small plates (beside a role in our sexuality) is simply the regulation of our body temperature and if we sit in natural or artificial sunlight, these plates become more blood-filled and the vessels become wider and the sun is able to heat up our Reptoid blood (which circulates through the body and through the plates) for many degrees and that gives us a great pleasure similar to and even greater than what you humans feel when you have sex.”
OUR ANCESTOR SPECIES EVOLVES
Meanwhile, our mammal ancestors, the simians, had been evolving alongside the dinosaurs for about 150 million years and also survived the fusion bomb of 65 million years ago being very tiny animals at the time. Then 10 million years ago, they became land-dwelling animals from the exclusively tree-dwelling animals they used to be.
During the evolutionary process, they divided into various species of all sorts – the larger chimpanzees, gibbons, orangutans, etc, and the smaller baboons and monkeys. It was only in the last 2-3 million years that one particular simian species was able to become relatively intelligent, the species that was to become known as Ape-Man, Homo Erectus, or Cro-Magnon man over time and Homo Sapiens eventually. Prior to that, this primate ancestor of ours was a simple, purely instinctive animal without an ounce of intelligence.
“We are a very old race in comparison to your kind, which was jumping around as small monkey-like animals in the trees at this time while we invented technology, colonised other planets of the Solar System, built large cities on this planet – which disappeared without a trace in the ages – and engineered our own genes while your genes were still those of animals,” Larceta iterated to the Swede.
“If nothing extraordinary had happened to your kind, we wouldn’t be able to sit here and talk because I would be sitting in my comfortable modern house and you would be curled up in your cave clothed with fur and trying to discover the secrets of fire. Or maybe you would be sitting in one of our zoos.
“But things developed differently and you believe now you are the ‘crown of creation’ and can sit in your modern house on the surface of the Earth in natural sunlight whilst we hide and live beneath the Earth or occasionally venture to the surface in remote and secluded places.”
What “extraordinary” thing happened to our ancestor simian species and how did Larceta’s species end up living underground instead of on the surface?
We have come a long way from the 19th century, when mental un-healthiness was not recognised as treatable. In those days mental health problems were viewed as a sign of madness, warranting imprisonment in often merciless and unhygienic conditions; and with that backdrop you would think twice before calling in sick because of stress or admit feelings of hopelessness or depression but that’s changing. That may sound like good news but it’s not.
Reasons why employees don’t show up for work can vary, but one thing is for certain; an organisation relies on its staff to get things done and when employees don’t show up for work it disrupts organisational plans, takes up the valuable time from management and lowers the company’s productivity. It’s always been that people miss work for several reasons, some understandable and legitimate and others less so but it’s important that we know the reasons so that such situations can be better managed.
Today stress is one of the most common causes of long-term absence and is especially prevalent amongst office-based staff. This is also related to absence due to depression or anxiety. Is this indicative of where we are as a society, a sign of the times which is that people are constantly pressurised and have less work-life balance?
The British Museum houses a tablet which provides a peek into work-life balance in ancient Egypt. It documents how many sick days and why 40 workers took time off from their workplace in 1250 BC. All sorts of fascinating reasons have been given for why people were away from their work, including a note about someone named Buqentuf, who needed time off for embalming and wrapping the corpse of his dead mother.
There were other reasons like some workers, such as a man named Pennub, missed work because their mothers were ill. Others had causes that we wouldn’t expect to hear as often today, such as men who stayed home to help around the house due to a “wife or daughter bleeding” – a reference to menstruation. But no mention of mental health, not because it didn’t exist, but it wasn’t labelled thus not reported.
What was reported was a person such as Aapehti who was said to have been ill on a regular basis and also took time off when he was “making offerings to god”. Workers also took days off when they had to perform tasks for their superiors – which was apparently permitted in moderate amounts. For example, Amenmose was allowed time away from work when he was “fetching stones for the scribe: And what about other employees who had to excuse themselves from work to brew beer, an activity which was associated with some of their gods and rituals.
All fascinating stuff which provides insight into life at that time. But what insights can we gather from today’s sick leave records? One study recently undertaken gives us insight into the UK police force’s absenteeism. Figures obtained through the Freedom of Information Act from police forces in the UK showed that the number of days absent due to mental health problems increased by 9% in one year, from 457,154 in 2020 to 497,154 in 2021.
And here is the shocker. Police have taken a record 500,000 days off due to mental health issues. Zoe Billingham, a former police inspector, suggested there was a greater prevalence of mental health issues among emergency services, due to what they faced during the pandemic of coronavirus. “Police and other frontline services have protected us during the pandemic,” she said. “The pandemic was a great unknown. People were really scared of dying and coming into contact with the virus, and a lot of people did.”
It is a ‘mental health epidemic’ among police. Alistair Carmichael, Home Affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, said: “Frontline police officers do an incredible job serving their communities. But we know that the stress of policing can take a heavy toll on the mental health of officers, in some cases leading to burnout.
Let’s look at another group. A poll by Gallup reported that in the last three years, 75% of young adults aged 18–22 have left their jobs because of stated mental health reasons. This study showed that employees (millennials and Gen Z) want employers who care about their wellbeing. Contributing factors to mental health stress centre around increases in uncertainty and include: Hybrid work environments and the side-effects: no socialization, no end time, no feedback, caring for others; changing rules around work often with poor communications & clarity; inconsistency & incompleteness of rule implementation: Uncertainty from these and other factors leads to anxiety and depression.
The real story here is not that burnout, stress, depression and anxiety are becoming the number one reasons for absenteeism but that for a large part they are preventable. We have the data telling us it’s the problem but still organisations are doing very little to proactively manage it. Sure, we have counselling services for staff who are struggling and wellness days to reinforce feelings of wellbeing, but this is not enough.
If we start caring and developing work cultures that do not create unintentional stress through how work gets done, that will go a long way to change the status quo. Simple things like ensuring your culture doesn’t thrive on fire drills and heroics to get things done and that emails do not come with expected responses after hours or over the weekend. If we can stop managers bullying, yelling or losing their cool when there is a performance or customer issue and begin giving people more control over their work – all of these are the kinds of stuff that contribute to weakened mental health and absenteeism.
To sum up, your staff’s stress levels are directly proportional to your business’s absentee levels. Ergo, lowering the former, will also reduce the latter. Stress down, productivity up and everybody wins out.
Contributing factors to mental health stress centre around increases in uncertainty and include: Hybrid work environments and the side-effects: no socialization, no end time, no feedback, caring for others; changing rules around work often with poor communications & clarity; inconsistency & incompleteness of rule implementation: Uncertainty from these and other factors leads to anxiety and depression.
In September 1978, General Atiku, Princess Diana had enrolled for a cookery course. That same month whilst she was staying at her parents’ home in Norfolk, her friends innocently asked about the health of her father John Spencer, the 8th Earl. Hitherto, the Earl’s health had never been a matter of concern but Diana somewhat inscrutably voiced a somewhat portendous outlook. “He’s going to drop down in some way,” she said. “If he dies, he will die immediately; otherwise he’ll survive.”
It came to pass, General. The following day, the telephone bell rang to the news that her father had collapsed in the courtyard of his Althorp Estate residence and that he had been rushed to a nearby hospital after suffering a massive cerebral haemorrhage. The medical prognosis was bleak: Earl Spencer was not expected to survive the night. Writes Andrew Morton in Diana Her True Story: “For two days the children camped out in the hospital waiting-room as their father clung on to life. When doctors announced that there was a glimmer of hope, Raine [second wife] organised a private ambulance to take him to the National Hospital for Nervous Diseases in Queen Square, Central London, where for several months he lay in a coma.”
Raine was so fiercely protective of her beloved husband that she had the nurses see to it that his own children did not come near him in this critical condition in his elitist private room. ‘I’m a survivor and people forget that at their peril,” she would later tell a journalist. “There’s pure steel up my backbone. Nobody destroys me, and nobody was going to destroy Johnnie so long as I could sit by his bed – some of his family tried to stop me – and will my life force into him.” But if Raine had steel in her, General, so did the implacable Spencer children, more so the eldest of them all. “During this critical time,” Morton goes on, “the ill feeling between Raine and the children boiled over into a series of vicious exchanges. There was iron too in the Spencer soul and numerous hospital corridors rang to the sound of the redoubtable Countess and the fiery Lady Sarah Spencer [the Earl’s firstborn child] hissing at each other like a pair of angry geese.”
As Diana had correctly predicted, her father was not destined to die at that juncture but healthwise he was never the same henceforth. First, he suffered a relapse in November that same year and was moved to another hospital. Once again, he teetered on the brink. He was drifting in and out of consciousness and as such he was not able to properly process people who were visiting him, including his own daughters when nurses relented and allowed them in. Even when he was awake a feeding tube in his throat meant that he was unable to speak. Understandably, Diana found it hard to concentrate on the cookery course she had enrolled in a few days before her father suffered his stroke.
But Raine, General, was determined that her husband survive come rain or shine. Morton: “When his doctors were at their most pessimistic, Raine’s will-power won through. She had heard of a German drug called Aslocillin which she thought could help and so she pulled every string to find a supply. It was unlicensed in Britain but that didn’t stop her. The wonder drug was duly acquired and miraculously did the trick. One afternoon she was maintaining her usual bedside vigil when, with the strains of Madam Butterfly playing in the background, he opened his eyes ‘and was back’. In January 1979, when he was finally released from hospital, he and Raine booked into the Dorchester Hotel in Park Lane for an expensive month-long convalescence. Throughout this episode the strain on the family was intense.”
Altogether, Earl Spencer had been in hospital for 8 straight months. The lingering effects of the stroke left him somewhat unsteady on his feet when he escorted his daughter down the aisle at St. Paul’s Cathedral in 1981 for her marriage to the Prince of Wales.
R.I.P. EARL SPENCER
It was not until March 29, 1992, General, that Earl Spencer finally gave up the ghost. He was admitted in hospital for pneumonia but what killed him days later was a heart attack. Rumours of his death actually began to make the rounds the day before he passed on. At the time, Diana was on a skiing holiday in the Austrian Alps along with her estranged hubby Prince Charles and their two kids William and Harry.
When Diana was told of her dad’s death, she insisted that under no circumstances would she return to England on the same flight as Charles, with whom she was barely on talking terms. “I mean it, Ken,” she told her body minder Ken Wharfe. “I don’t want him with me. He doesn’t love me – he loves that woman [Camilla]. Why should I help save his face? Why the bloody hell should I? It’s my father who has gone. It’s a bit bloody late for Charles to start playing the caring husband, don’t you think so?”
Naturally, General, Charles was alarmed, particularly that his efforts to use one of his right-hand-men to reason with the Princess had been rebuffed. He therefore prevailed over Wharfe to try and ram sense into his wife. “Lord Spencer’s death was a major news story,” writes Ken Wharfe, “and if the Prince and Princess did not return to Britain together then nothing, not even compassion for the grief-stricken Diana, would stop the journalists from going for the jugular. The truth about the Waleses would be immediately and blindingly obvious to the most naive journalist … Returning to the Princess’s room, I told her bluntly that this was not a matter for debate. ‘Ma’am, you have to go back with the Prince. This one is not open for discussion. You just have to go with it’.’’
At long last persuaded, General, Diana said, “Okay Ken, I’ll do it. Tell him I’ll do it, but it is for my father, not for him – it is out of loyalty to my father.” But what in truth got Diana to change tack was the intervention of the Queen, who personally called her at Charles’ own request. That, however, General, was only as far as Diana was prepared to play ball: as far as engaging with Charles in conversation was concerned, that was simply inconceivable. “There was an icy silence for the rest of the two-hour journey,” writes Wharfe. “Nothing was said during the entire flight. The Princess did not want to speak to her husband and he, fearing a furious or even hysterical outburst, did not dare even to try to start a conversation. Whatever the discomforts of the journey, however, it was soon clear that the PR spin had worked. The next day it was reported that Prince Charles was at Diana’s side in her hour of need. Yet as soon as the Prince and Princess arrived at Kensington Palace they went their separate ways – he to Highgrove, and she to pay her last respects to her father.”
Lord Spencer was 68 when he died. He was a remote descendant of King Henry VIII.
PRINCE CHARLES FINALLY OWNS UP TO ADULTERY WITH CAMILLA
In June 1994, when Diana and Charles had been separated for exactly one-and-half years, Prince Charles was interviewed in a BBC documentary by Jonathan Dimbleby. The interview was billed as intended to mark Charles’ 25 anniversary as Prince of Wales but it was in truth a not-to-cleverly-disguised riposte to Diana Her True Story, the highly controversial 1992 collaboration between Diana and Andrew Morton.
In the interview, which was watched by 13 million people, Charles, General, openly admitted for the first time that he had committed adultery with Camilla Parker-Bowles, who he hailed as, “a great friend of mine who has been a friend for a very long time and will continue to be a friend for a very long time”. Diana had been requested to feature in the interview alongside her husband but she parried the overture on the advice of her aides, which was spot-on as she would have been greatly embarrassed by her hubby’s unsavoury confession in her own face and on national television.
The Prince’s candid confessional was followed weeks later by a book titled The Prince of Wales: A Biography, which was written by the same Jonathan Dimbleby. The book was even frankier than the interview. In it, Charles put it bluntly that she had never once loved Diana and that he married her only because he was coerced into doing so by his notoriously overbearing father. Charles also made it known that as a child, he had been bullied by his abusive father, virtually ignored by his mother, and persecuted by a wife he portrayed as both spoiled and mentally unstable. Both Diana and his parents were revolted by the bare-knuckle contents of the book though Dana need not have been irked considering that it was she herself who had fired the first salvo in the Morton book.
BASHIR INTERVIEW BODES ILL FOR DIANA
If Diana’s collaboration with Morton was a miscalculation, General, Prince Charles’ Dimbleby interview was equally so. For in November 1995, the wayward Princess hit back with her own tell-all interview on BBC’s current affairs programme called Panorama. “She wanted to get even with Prince Charles over his adulterous confession with the Dimbleby documentary,” writes Paul Burrell, her final butler, in A Royal Duty.
The interview was conducted by journalist Martin Bashir who was attached to BBC, and was watched by 23 million people, conferring it the distinction of having attracted the largest audience for any television documentary in broadcasting history. In the interview, Diana voiced concern about there having been “three of us in this marriage and so it was a bit crowded”, the intruder obviously being Camilla. Diana also gave Charles a dose of his own medicine by confessing to her own adulterous relationship with James Hewitt, of whom she said, “Yes, I adored him, yes, I was in love with him”. Hewitt had at the time documented his affair with Diana in lurid detail in a best-selling book and Diana thought he had ill-conceivedly stabbed her in the back.
And as if to rub salt into the wound, General, Diana cast serious doubts on her husband’s fitness to rule as future King and therefore his eventual accession to the British throne. Unfortunately for her, the interview sealed her fate in so far as her marriage was concerned. “In her headstrong decision to co-operate with Bashir,” says Burrell, “she had never considered, perhaps naively, the implications that Panorama had for her marriage.” Indeed, just four weeks after the interview, the Queen, after consultation with the Prime Minister and the Archbishop of Canterbury, wrote personally to both the Prince and Princess of Wales requesting that they divorce sooner rather than later.
It was a dream-come-true for at least two parties to the triangle, namely Charles and Camilla. But did it also constitute music to the ears of Princess Diana too, General?
SOWING THE WIND ONLY TO REAP THE WHIRLWIND: Martin Bashir interviews Princess Diana in a BBC documentary which aired on Monday 29 November 1995. The interview incensed the Windsors: the following month, Queen Elizabeth ordered Charles and Diana to sever matrimonial ties. In her vengeful resolve to hit back at her husband following his own interview the previous year, Diana had foolishly sown the wind and reaped the whirlwind.
Islam is a way of life completed and perfected by the last and final Messenger of Allah, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). The Holy Quran along with the practical teachings of the Prophet (pbuh) forms the basis of Islamic law, social, economic and political systems of Islam – in short the basis of a complete code of conduct for the entire life of a Muslim
Regrettably in this day and age there are certain views in non-Muslims that have a very negative ‘view’ of Islam. The bottom line is that if a Muslim says that two plus two is four, others can ‘argue’ to say three plus one is four, or two times two is four or the square root of 16 is four. The bottom line is no matter what we may think we all are ‘correct’. The fact is that we are all on this earth for a ‘limited’ time. Regardless of beliefs, tribe, race, colour or our social standing in life, we will all die one day or the other and we will “all” be called up thereafter to answer for our behaviour, beliefs, and our life on this earth.
To a Muslim the Holy Quran is the Divine Revelation which is all encompassing and lays down in clear terms, how we should live our daily lives including the need for humans to allow fellow humans certain basic rights at all times. Due to the limited space available I can only reflect on some of the major fundamental rights laid down by Islam:
Right to life
The first and foremost of fundamental basic human-rights is the right to life. “Whosoever kills any human being (without any valid reason) like manslaughter or any disruption and chaos on earth, it is though he had killed all the mankind. And whoever saves a life it is though as he had saved the lives of all mankind” (Quran Ch5: v 32). It further declares: “Do not kill a soul which Allah has made sacred except through the due process of law” (Quran Ch6: v 151). Islam further explains that this sacrosanct right to life is not granted only to its adherents (believers), but it has been granted to all human beings without consideration of their religion, race, colour or sex
Right to Equality
The Holy Quran recognises equality between humans irrespective of any distinction of nationality, race, colour or gender. “O Mankind We have created you from a male and female, and We made you as nations and tribes so that you may be able to recognise each other (not that you may despise each other). Indeed the most honourable among you before God is the most God-conscious”. (Quran Ch49: v 13). The Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) further explained this: “No Arab has any superiority over a non-Arab, nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab…… You are all the children of Adam and Adam was created from soil”. If there is any superiority for a man it is based on his piety, righteousness, sense of responsibility and character. Even such a person with these noble qualities would not have any privileged rights over others.
Right to justice
Allah Almighty has bestowed on all human beings, believer or non-believer, friend or foe the right to justice. The Holy Quran states: “We sent our messengers with clear teachings and sent down along with them the Book and the Balance so that society may be established on the basis of justice” (Quran Ch 57 : v 25). It further says “O Believers stand for the cause of God and as witness to justice and remember that enmity of some people should not lead you to injustice. Be just as it is nearest to God consciousness” (Quran Ch 5:v 8 ). This makes it obligatory that a believer must uphold justice in all circumstances, including to his enemies.
Right to freedom of conscience and religion
The Holy Quran clearly mentions that there is no compulsion in accepting or rejecting a religion. “There is no compulsion in (submitting to) the religion” (Quran Ch 2 : v 256). Every individual has been granted basic freedom to accept a religion of his or her choice. Therefore no religion should be imposed on a person.
Right to personal freedom
No person can be deprived of his or her personal freedom except in pursuance of justice. Therefore there cannot be any arbitrary or preventive arrest without the permission of duly appointed judge and in the light of a solid proof.
Right to Protection of Honour
Every person has been ensured basic human dignity which should not be violated. If someone falsely attacks the honour of a person the culprit will be punished according to the Islamic Law. The Holy Quran says: “Do not let one group of people make fun of another group”. It further states: “Do not defame one another”, the Quran goes on to say: And do not backbite or speak ill of one another” (Quran Ch 49 : v 11-12).