A colleague of mine has been a football enthusiast forever and with an almost religious dedication he commits and supports his English team with fervor. There isn’t a match he would miss, developments he would not follow and his general knowledge of his team and the game is considerable. Following, supporting and learning about his team are effortless activities. On the local front he is doing some great stuff to further the cause. With altruistic intentions he coaches soccer to teenage boys from diverse social and economic backgrounds and is achieving fantastic results.
What he is doing is not just about the soccer however as there are other things going on which contribute to the development of these young people: creating experiences and memories; crafting opportunities etc. Some days, especially during tournaments, he can be on his feet for 12 hours, organizing, encouraging and, as he says, experiencing task absorption to the extent that time simply flies past. He becomes immersed, free of any aches, pains, fatigue or discomfort that might arise from a long day of graft. When he talks of his local team his passion ignites, he becomes animated and enthusiastic about his labour of love. Such is his enjoyment that that he can be said to be in flow.
Coined by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, flow is a “state of deep, effortless involvement”. It happens most frequently when we concentrate our undivided attention on activities that are moderately challenging to us. When a person is in flow, it often happens that their sense of self vanishes and time stops. One of the things about flow, according to psychologist Martin Seligman, is that in order to achieve it, you must identify your signature strengths, or strengths that are deeply characteristic of yourself, and learn how to practice them and this is what contributes to us leading the good life.
We achieve the good life by discovering our unique virtues and strengths, and employing them creatively to enhance our lives. Surely life is only truly satisfying when we are aware and realise value within ourselves and one of the ways of doing this is by nurturing our unique strengths in contributing to the happiness of our fellow humans. This is precisely what my colleague does with his local team.
I am struck with the realization that in the 12 or so years that I have worked alongside him I have only witnessed a generally happy person and, on further reflection, he could be a text book example of happy. If we consider that there are, three ‘orientations’(from the book ‘Authentic Happiness’) or three kinds of happiness, we can say that the first is pleasure and a person living a life of pleasure is evinced by exerting mostly positive emotions such as enjoyment, happiness, joy and interest and displaying minimal negative emotions.
In all the years I have worked with him I have only seen these positive characteristics. It’s quite incredible really that I can’t recall EVER seeing him sad or unhappy. The second is engagement – a person living a life of engagement consistently seeks out activities which allow him/her to be in flow. The third is meaning – and leading a life of meaning is belonging to and serving something that is bigger than him and these larger entities could be community or religion for example and my colleague’s dual example in soccer and as a very devout spiritual person illustrates this perfectly.
I can easily contrast his experiences with mine this week where I have been forced to engage in an activity which doesn’t play to my strengths. I am attempting to schedule a complex series of activities which are truly wholly beyond my capability. So I hate the task, am doing it very badly and time has been going slower than a snail’s pace. Such is the space when you are not in flow.
It’s clear then that the more people you have in flow in your organization, the more happiness you will have; and happiness is money; and I as I have said countless times there is enough evidence, by now, to support the belief that happy people are more productive. In fact, in a Gallup-Healthways study and Well-Being Index it estimates that unhappiness among workers in the U.S. is costing a whopping $300 billion per year in lost productivity. In a study by Andrew J. Oswald and his team they provided evidence that happiness positively impacts productivity. An unbelievably simple experiment to demonstrate this was done when subjects had their happiness levels increased by being shown a clip of comedy routines and the participants who had watched the clip showed a 12 percent increase in productivity than those who had watched a dull or neutral “placebo" clip.
If you are interested in developing insights into yourself or gauging where you or your staff might place on the happiness, flow or engagement continuum a good place to start would be to visit a website of Penn State University which has a number of questionnaires to measure everything related to being happy, from strengths to positive emotions, happiness and depression. They are very quick to do and are free, and all you need to do is register. Here you can get a measure on how your staff is doing, in flow or not and if ‘not’ you could always try screening a funny video clip every morning. At least that way, when your staff say ‘This place is a joke’, it could actually be meant as a compliment.
STUART WHITE is a business and personal development coach and Managing Director of HRMC
The past week or two has been a mixed grill of briefs in so far as the national employment picture is concerned. BDC just injected a further P64 million in Kromberg & Schubert, the automotive cable manufacturer and exporter, to help keep it afloat in the face of the COVID-19-engendered global economic apocalypse. The financial lifeline, which follows an earlier P36 million way back in 2017, hopefully guarantees the jobs of 2500, maybe for another year or two.
It was also reported that a bulb manufacturing company, which is two years old and is youth-led, is making waves in Selibe Phikwe. Called Bulb Word, it is the only bulb manufacturing operation in Botswana and employs 60 people. The figure is not insignificant in a town that had 5000 jobs offloaded in one fell swoop when BCL closed shop in 2016 under seemingly contrived circumstances, so that as I write, two or three buyers have submitted bids to acquire and exhume it from its stage-managed grave.
Youngest Maccabees scion Jonathan takes over after Judas and leads for 18 years
Going hand-in-glove with the politics at play in Judea in the countdown to the AD era, General Atiku, was the contention for the priesthood. You will be aware, General, that politics and religion among the Jews interlocked. If there wasn’t a formal and sovereign Jewish King, there of necessity had to be a High Priest at any given point in time.
Initially, every High Priest was from the tribe of Levi as per the stipulation of the Torah. At some stage, however, colonisers of Judah imposed their own hand-picked High Priests who were not ethnic Levites. One such High Priest was Menelaus of the tribe of Benjamin.
Parliament has rejected a motion by Leader of Opposition (LOO) calling for the reversing of the recent appointments of ruling party activists to various Land Boards across the country. The motion also called for the appointment of young and qualified Batswana with tertiary education qualifications.
The ruling party could not allow that motion to be adopted for many reasons discussed below. Why did the LOO table this motion? Why was it negated? Why are Land Boards so important that a ruling party felt compelled to deploy its functionaries to the leadership and membership positions?
Prior to the motion, there was a LOO parliamentary question on these appointments. The Speaker threw a spanner in the works by ruling that availing a list of applicants to determine who qualified and who didn’t would violate the rights of those citizens. This has completely obliterated oversight attempts by Parliament on the matter.
How can parliament ascertain the veracity of the claim without the names of applicants? The opposition seeks to challenge this decision in court. It would also be difficult in the future for Ministers and government officials to obey instructions by investigative Parliamentary Committees to summon evidence which include list of persons. It would be a bad precedent if the decision is not reviewed and set aside by the Business Advisory Committee or a Court of law.
Prior to independence, Dikgosi allocated land for residential and agricultural purposes. At independence, land tenures in Botswana became freehold, state land and tribal land. Before 1968, tribal land, which is land belonging to different tribes, dating back to pre-independence, was allocated and administered by Dikgosi under Customary Law. Dikgosi are currently merely ‘land overseers’, a responsibility that can be delegated. Land overseers assist the Land Boards by confirming the vacancy or availability for occupation of land applied for.
Post-independence, the country was managed through modern law and customary law, a system developed during colonialism. Land was allocated for agricultural purposes such as ploughing and grazing and most importantly for residential use. Over time some land was allocated for commercial purpose. In terms of the law, sinking of boreholes and development of wells was permitted and farmers had some rights over such developed water resources.
Land Boards were established under Section 3 of the Tribal Land Act of 1968 with the intention to improve tribal land administration. Whilst the law was enacted in 1968, Land Boards started operating around 1970 under the Ministry of Local Government and Lands which was renamed Ministry of Lands and Housing (MLH) in 1999. These statutory bodies were a mechanism to also prune the powers of Dikgosi over tribal land. Currently, land issues fall under the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services.
There are 12 Main Land Boards, namely Ngwato, Kgatleng, Tlokweng, Tati, Chobe, Tawana, Malete, Rolong, Ghanzi, Kgalagadi, Kweneng and Ngwaketse Land Boards. The Tribal Land Act of 1968 as amended in 1994 provides that the Land Boards have the powers to rescind the grant of any rights to use any land, impose restrictions on land usage and facilitate any transfer or change of use of land.
Some land administration powers have been decentralized to sub land boards. The devolved powers include inter alia common law and customary law water rights and land applications, mining, evictions and dispute resolution. However, decisions can be appealed to the land board or to the Minister who is at the apex.
So, land boards are very powerful entities in the country’s local government system. Membership to these institutions is important not only because of monetary benefits of allowances but also the power of these bodies. in terms of the law, candidates for appointment to Land Boards or Subs should be residents of the tribal areas where appointments are sought, be holders of at least Junior Certificate and not actively involved in politics. The LOO contended that ruling party activists have been appointed in the recent appointments.
He argued that worse, some had no minimum qualifications required by the law and that some are not inhabitants of the tribal or sub tribal areas where they have been appointed. It was also pointed that some people appointed are septuagenarians and that younger qualified Batswana with degrees have been rejected.
Other arguments raised by the opposition in general were that the development was not unusual. That the ruling party is used to politically motivated appointments in parastatals, civil service, diplomatic missions, specially elected councilors and Members of Parliament (MPs), Bogosi and Land Boards. Usually these positions are distributed as patronage to activists in return for their support and loyalty to the political leadership and the party.
The ruling party contended that when the Minister or the Ministry intervened and ultimately appointed the Land Boards Chairpersons, Deputies and members , he didn’t have information, as this was not information required in the application, on who was politically active and for that reason he could not have known who to not appoint on that basis. They also argued that opposition activists have been appointed to positions in the government.
The counter argument was that there was a reason for the legal requirement of exclusion of political activists and that the government ought to have mechanisms to detect those. The whole argument of “‘we didn’t know who was politically active” was frivolous. The fact is that ruling party activists have been appointed. The opposition also argued that erstwhile activists from their ranks have been recruited through positions and that a few who are serving in public offices have either been bought or hold insignificant positions which they qualified for anyway.
Whilst people should not be excluded from public positions because of their political activism, the ruling party cannot hide the fact that they have used public positions to reward activists. Exclusion of political activists may be a violation of fundamental human or constitutional rights. But, the packing of Land Boards with the ruling party activists is clear political corruption. It seeks to sow divisions in communities and administer land in a politically biased manner.
It should be expected that the ruling party officials applying for land or change of land usage etcetera will be greatly assisted. Since land is wealth, the ruling party seeks to secure resources for its members and leaders. The appointments served to reward 2019 election primary and general elections losers and other activists who have shown loyalty to the leadership and the party.
Running a country like this has divided it in a way that may be difficult to undo. The next government may decide to reset the whole system by replacing many of government agencies leadership and management in a way that is political. In fact, it would be compelled to do so to cleanse the system.
The opposition is also pondering on approaching the courts for review of the decision to appoint party functionaries and the general violation of clearly stated terms of reference. If this can be established with evidence, the courts can set aside the decision on the basis that unqualified people have been appointed.
The political activism aspect may also not be difficult to prove as some of these people are known activists who are in party structures, at least at the time of appointment, and some were recently candidates. There is a needed for civil society organizations such as trade unions and political parties to fight some of these decisions through peaceful protests and courts.