He resides in the Central Universe in a region of the greater universe called the Unum
Everything that exists has a maker, a creator. Nothing created itself – except, arguably, what is called the First Source. The First Source is commonly referred to as God.
Even the Anunnaki, the Old Testament gods as we shall in due course establish, didn’t initially claim they were God. The 6000-year-old Sumerian records document that the Anunnaki did refer to a force they called the “Creator of All”, the omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent force that brought everything both seen and unseen into existence. When Enki boasts that “I created mankind I Enki”, he means fashioning us from already created matter as we shall demonstrate in due course. Enki created us scientifically, by way of genetic tinkering, and not from scratch.
It was the Jews, the chosen people of one Anunnaki royal – referred to as Enlil in the Sumerian chronicles but as Jehovah in the Old Testament – who both by way of hype and as victims of brainwash turned the Anunnaki into the creators of everything. Otherwise, earlier strains of mankind (of the Adam and Eve genre) simply revered the Anunnaki: they never worshipped them whatsoever.
GENESIS 1:1, when correctly translated, says in the beginning the Elohim (a plural word, the Anunnaki royal pantheon of 13 led by Anu, the father of Enlil) created the cosmos. This is a radical departure from what the Sumerian records, which predated Genesis by more than 1000 years, say.
The Sumerians characterise the Anunnaki as Aliens from another planet who were capable of great feats but mortal all the same. They lived for hundreds of thousands of years yes and wrought wondrous acts (in the eyes of mankind) but they too were subject to infirmity and physical degradation at long last because like humans they were creatures and not God. They did die. If they were a clan of real Gods, death would never have to happen to them.
OUR GOD HAS A GOD
Now, if everything has a creator, then even the First Source must have a creator. Nothing creates itself. Where there is a creature, there is always a creator. Everything ought to have a beginning by rights. So who created the First Source? And where does this First Source reside? These questions may at surface seem unfathomable but an attempt at fathoming them can be made by using simple common sense. Let’s take a circle. When you draw a circle using a pair of compasses, there is naturally a point at which you start. However, when the compass makes one complete turn, the starting point is no longer traceable: every given point along the circle now qualifies as a possible starting point.
The concept of a First Source is similar. The universe, or rather, the omniverse, is infinite. It has no beginning and no end because when you assume a beginning, the inevitable question that arises is, what came before the beginning? Who began the beginning? And if you assume an end, the question that inevitably follows is, what comes after the end since we know from our own experiences in life that nothing really comes to an end as birth is always conquering death and out of decay there always springs renewal? What lies beyond the boundary if there is a boundary?
Just as there are countless universes in the omniverse, there are countless beings who call themselves First Source. Each of these First Sources has a region of the omniverse which they rule. All these First Sources are aware they are not the very First Source but they let the beings over whom they rule believe they are the only First Source in existence in the omniverse (or their creatures out of a sense of stupendous awe simply take it for granted that they are First Source).
In light of the above, my advice for what it is worth is this: if one day after you transition from this world you meet your God and that God tells you he is the only God in existence in the omniverse, take that that as a red flag. That God has failed the truth serum: he is a blatant liar. If he is a truthful God, he should be candid and forthright enough to own up to the fact that yes, he is your God because he is the ruler of his region of the omniverse.
As a spirit, you arose in a universe that he fashioned and so he must be your creator. However, he too has a God to whom he may no longer be accountable (just as we cease to be accountable to our parents and begin to chart our own destiny with our own families and means when we attain adulthood) but who exists somewhere in the infinite expanse of the omniverse.
THE ORDER OF COSMIC PHENOMENA
In order for us to get to grips with the concept of God, it is important, first, that we categorise phenomena.
First, there is the omniverse. If the omniverse is a set, for argument’s sake, everything else is a subset. Everything that exists is ultimately part of the omniverse. There is only one omniverse and it’s infinite.
The omniverse is divided into countless divisions which go by several fancy names, but I will settle for only one – the unum. That’s the term I’ll employ throughout the Earth Chronicles. If, for argument’s sake, our world is the omniverse, then the seven continents would represent the unums. No one knows how many unums there are in the omniverse. They are so many that we cannot envisage a number for them. In fact, the number of unums has no limit: new ones keep forming just like new babies are born every day.
The unum (also called the Grand Universe amongst other names) of which we are a part comprises of seven superuniverses. Other unums in the vast expanse of the omniverse have their own superuniverses but how many superuniverses there are per unum we cannot tell. Suffice it to say that each superuniverse is always expanding: it does not remain the same in capacity.
Of the seven superuniverses (or simply universes as they are commonly referred to) there are in our unum, ours is the very 7th. It explains why 7 is such an important number in the history of our planet. Seven was the number of Enlil, the Anunnaki “god” the Bible calls Jehovah. It is also the number of Earth in that counting from the planet Pluto, Earth is the 7th planet. It is not by chance that Earth is in the position it is: it is by deliberate design, a subject we will dwell upon at a later stage.
A universe, also called a cosmos, is made up of galaxies. In our universe, for example, there is the Milky Way Galaxy, of which we are part, the Andromeda Galaxy, and the Whirlpool Galaxy. The Hubble telescope has revealed an estimated 100 billion galaxies and more will certainly be found as it’s viewing technology improves. Some estimates put the number of galaxies in our universe at 10 trillion. New galaxies are being born every now and then, just as some are dissolving every now and again. It’s not only organic life that births and dies: cosmic phenomena also die at some stage after billions of years of existence.
Galaxies are in turn made up of constellations. Constellations are clusters of star systems. Examples are the Taurus, the Serpens, the Orion, the Sirius, and the Draco constellations. The Milky Way Galaxy houses 88 constellations.
Stars are also known as suns. Almost every sun has a family comprising of itself and other cosmic bodies known as planets. For example, our sun is called Solaris and its family of ten planets (inclusive of the downgraded Pluto and the little-known Nibiru) is known as the Solar System. Like humans, suns do die. Some are even born premature and do not develop into full suns. These are called dwarf stars. They are lone stars which do not have a family of planets.
Some calculations put the total number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy at 100 octillion (“1” with 29 zeroes).
ALIENS ENLIGHTEN ABOUT ABODE OF GOD
At one stage in the course of the Zeta Series, I talked about a man code-named called Fifteen (his real name is not known), who is the world’s most brilliant man with an immeasurable IQ. Fifteen heads the world’s most secret high-tech R&D outfit called the Labyrinth Group. The Labyrinth group is made up of 200 Aliens, code-named the Corteum, who are under the supervision of their leader called Mahu Nahi, and 118 brilliant human scientists.
The Corteum are said to have come from a planet that revolves around Sirius B, which makes them related to the Anunnaki in one way or the other. The Corteum, who range between 7-10 feet in height, are contracted with the US shadow government (the real rulers of America and to which Barak Obama is subordinate) in an arrangement known as TTP (Technology Transfer Programmes). They supply the shadow government with technology so advanced the familiar, mainstream technology in use at present is 40-50 years out of date.
Since the Corteum evolved far much earlier than we Earthlings did, they know a great deal more about how life began and have disseminated this information to the human members of the Labyrinth Group. Some of this information is been systematically divulged to the wider public by a man who goes by the name Jamisson Neruda, who I talked about at length in the Zeta Series too. Drawing on knowledge imparted to him by the Corteum, Jamisson Neruda, a Labyrinth Group renegade, says the unum of which we are part consists of 7 superuniverses, which revolve around a Central Universe. It is in the Central Universe that our God, the First Source, resides.
Of course this First Source is only so because he either created or founded the unum of which we are part. He too was created by another First Source somewhere in the omniverse and when he had sufficiently evolved after eons of existence, he was now able to spawn his own creation. That is the destiny of every sentient being, such as you and me. Contrary to what is commonly taught by New Agers, our ultimate destiny in the transmigration of the soul is not to return to First Source and reunite with him forever: that is disinformation meant to deflect us from our preordained cosmic path. Our cosmic destiny is to continue to evolve (we may alternate between evolving and devolving along the way but on balance our destiny is to evolve) so that at long last each becomes his own God, with his own creation in terms of realms of existence such as a unum and own sentient beings.
The one thing I keep telling people who insist that our ultimate destiny is to reunite with the First Source is that they are deeply flawed in their reasoning. When we produce kids, for example, we do not wish them to be entirely and permanently dependent on us. We do not wish to babysit them forever. We want them to grow so that they will be able to fend for themselves, lead their own lives, chart their own destiny. Our wish is that they one day be as successful as we or even more so. If we are wealthy ourselves, we give them the best education and training so that they participate in growing our wealth and inherit it when we pass on.
We do not let our children loose into the world to learn lessons so that they ultimately come back and be under our guardianship forever and ever. If that were to happen, it would be either we failed to raise them properly or some serious glitch occurred in the course of their upbringing (such as a crippling handicap occasioned by an accident). Otherwise, we want to see them grow, find a good job, begin a family, prosper through the acquisition of all sorts of possessions and leave happily ever after.
God’s desire for us, his creation, is the same. He wants us to eventually become masters of our own destiny, to be our own God with our own cosmic domains. That’s the crowning achievement of every well-meaning God. When we at long last call at his courts in the Central Universe at the end of our cosmic pilgrimage, all we do is dutifully report to him our experiences and our endowments and inform him that we are now ready to found our own realms of existence and render our appreciation for having arisen and matured in his unum.
Any God who tells you his wish is that you return to him at some stage after your cosmic exploits are complete (the so-called appointed time) so that you could worship him day and night (REVELATION 7:15) is not a genuine God. He is an impostor. He is an egocentric, power-hungry, bogus god whose wish is not to empower his creation but to rig and booby-trap their cosmic journey so that eventually they have no option but to return to him with cap in hand and be his subjects forever and ever.
The “God” our mainstream religions worship is one such impostor. The Bible calls him Jehovah. The properly enlightened Gnostics of the first century (of whom Jesus was a member) called him a Demiurge, meaning a masquerade god.
The past week or two has been a mixed grill of briefs in so far as the national employment picture is concerned. BDC just injected a further P64 million in Kromberg & Schubert, the automotive cable manufacturer and exporter, to help keep it afloat in the face of the COVID-19-engendered global economic apocalypse. The financial lifeline, which follows an earlier P36 million way back in 2017, hopefully guarantees the jobs of 2500, maybe for another year or two.
It was also reported that a bulb manufacturing company, which is two years old and is youth-led, is making waves in Selibe Phikwe. Called Bulb Word, it is the only bulb manufacturing operation in Botswana and employs 60 people. The figure is not insignificant in a town that had 5000 jobs offloaded in one fell swoop when BCL closed shop in 2016 under seemingly contrived circumstances, so that as I write, two or three buyers have submitted bids to acquire and exhume it from its stage-managed grave.
Youngest Maccabees scion Jonathan takes over after Judas and leads for 18 years
Going hand-in-glove with the politics at play in Judea in the countdown to the AD era, General Atiku, was the contention for the priesthood. You will be aware, General, that politics and religion among the Jews interlocked. If there wasn’t a formal and sovereign Jewish King, there of necessity had to be a High Priest at any given point in time.
Initially, every High Priest was from the tribe of Levi as per the stipulation of the Torah. At some stage, however, colonisers of Judah imposed their own hand-picked High Priests who were not ethnic Levites. One such High Priest was Menelaus of the tribe of Benjamin.
Parliament has rejected a motion by Leader of Opposition (LOO) calling for the reversing of the recent appointments of ruling party activists to various Land Boards across the country. The motion also called for the appointment of young and qualified Batswana with tertiary education qualifications.
The ruling party could not allow that motion to be adopted for many reasons discussed below. Why did the LOO table this motion? Why was it negated? Why are Land Boards so important that a ruling party felt compelled to deploy its functionaries to the leadership and membership positions?
Prior to the motion, there was a LOO parliamentary question on these appointments. The Speaker threw a spanner in the works by ruling that availing a list of applicants to determine who qualified and who didn’t would violate the rights of those citizens. This has completely obliterated oversight attempts by Parliament on the matter.
How can parliament ascertain the veracity of the claim without the names of applicants? The opposition seeks to challenge this decision in court. It would also be difficult in the future for Ministers and government officials to obey instructions by investigative Parliamentary Committees to summon evidence which include list of persons. It would be a bad precedent if the decision is not reviewed and set aside by the Business Advisory Committee or a Court of law.
Prior to independence, Dikgosi allocated land for residential and agricultural purposes. At independence, land tenures in Botswana became freehold, state land and tribal land. Before 1968, tribal land, which is land belonging to different tribes, dating back to pre-independence, was allocated and administered by Dikgosi under Customary Law. Dikgosi are currently merely ‘land overseers’, a responsibility that can be delegated. Land overseers assist the Land Boards by confirming the vacancy or availability for occupation of land applied for.
Post-independence, the country was managed through modern law and customary law, a system developed during colonialism. Land was allocated for agricultural purposes such as ploughing and grazing and most importantly for residential use. Over time some land was allocated for commercial purpose. In terms of the law, sinking of boreholes and development of wells was permitted and farmers had some rights over such developed water resources.
Land Boards were established under Section 3 of the Tribal Land Act of 1968 with the intention to improve tribal land administration. Whilst the law was enacted in 1968, Land Boards started operating around 1970 under the Ministry of Local Government and Lands which was renamed Ministry of Lands and Housing (MLH) in 1999. These statutory bodies were a mechanism to also prune the powers of Dikgosi over tribal land. Currently, land issues fall under the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services.
There are 12 Main Land Boards, namely Ngwato, Kgatleng, Tlokweng, Tati, Chobe, Tawana, Malete, Rolong, Ghanzi, Kgalagadi, Kweneng and Ngwaketse Land Boards. The Tribal Land Act of 1968 as amended in 1994 provides that the Land Boards have the powers to rescind the grant of any rights to use any land, impose restrictions on land usage and facilitate any transfer or change of use of land.
Some land administration powers have been decentralized to sub land boards. The devolved powers include inter alia common law and customary law water rights and land applications, mining, evictions and dispute resolution. However, decisions can be appealed to the land board or to the Minister who is at the apex.
So, land boards are very powerful entities in the country’s local government system. Membership to these institutions is important not only because of monetary benefits of allowances but also the power of these bodies. in terms of the law, candidates for appointment to Land Boards or Subs should be residents of the tribal areas where appointments are sought, be holders of at least Junior Certificate and not actively involved in politics. The LOO contended that ruling party activists have been appointed in the recent appointments.
He argued that worse, some had no minimum qualifications required by the law and that some are not inhabitants of the tribal or sub tribal areas where they have been appointed. It was also pointed that some people appointed are septuagenarians and that younger qualified Batswana with degrees have been rejected.
Other arguments raised by the opposition in general were that the development was not unusual. That the ruling party is used to politically motivated appointments in parastatals, civil service, diplomatic missions, specially elected councilors and Members of Parliament (MPs), Bogosi and Land Boards. Usually these positions are distributed as patronage to activists in return for their support and loyalty to the political leadership and the party.
The ruling party contended that when the Minister or the Ministry intervened and ultimately appointed the Land Boards Chairpersons, Deputies and members , he didn’t have information, as this was not information required in the application, on who was politically active and for that reason he could not have known who to not appoint on that basis. They also argued that opposition activists have been appointed to positions in the government.
The counter argument was that there was a reason for the legal requirement of exclusion of political activists and that the government ought to have mechanisms to detect those. The whole argument of “‘we didn’t know who was politically active” was frivolous. The fact is that ruling party activists have been appointed. The opposition also argued that erstwhile activists from their ranks have been recruited through positions and that a few who are serving in public offices have either been bought or hold insignificant positions which they qualified for anyway.
Whilst people should not be excluded from public positions because of their political activism, the ruling party cannot hide the fact that they have used public positions to reward activists. Exclusion of political activists may be a violation of fundamental human or constitutional rights. But, the packing of Land Boards with the ruling party activists is clear political corruption. It seeks to sow divisions in communities and administer land in a politically biased manner.
It should be expected that the ruling party officials applying for land or change of land usage etcetera will be greatly assisted. Since land is wealth, the ruling party seeks to secure resources for its members and leaders. The appointments served to reward 2019 election primary and general elections losers and other activists who have shown loyalty to the leadership and the party.
Running a country like this has divided it in a way that may be difficult to undo. The next government may decide to reset the whole system by replacing many of government agencies leadership and management in a way that is political. In fact, it would be compelled to do so to cleanse the system.
The opposition is also pondering on approaching the courts for review of the decision to appoint party functionaries and the general violation of clearly stated terms of reference. If this can be established with evidence, the courts can set aside the decision on the basis that unqualified people have been appointed.
The political activism aspect may also not be difficult to prove as some of these people are known activists who are in party structures, at least at the time of appointment, and some were recently candidates. There is a needed for civil society organizations such as trade unions and political parties to fight some of these decisions through peaceful protests and courts.