We need to find a balance in our lives that will bring peace to our heart, mind and soul because the world we live in today has many challenges and difficulties that stress our lives. We are often attracted to the glamour and glitter of this world forgetting that our ultimate objective is to reserve our place in the life to come. For this we need to reform ourselves, but as the last two articles mentioned the road to self-reformation is long and at times a difficult one.
The root cause of most of our daily irritations and problems stem from what is commonly known as the ‘seven deadly sins’; most religions, faiths and Divine beliefs in one way or the other, identify these personal traits as undesirable and warns believers against them. Once we conquer these ‘sins’ we will be on the first stretch of road to peace of heart, mind and soul.
To achieve this we need the inner desire to transform ourselves from within so that we begin to realise our true purpose on this earth, so that our worldly life is in alignment with what our Lord and Creator intended for His faithful.
Firstly, mankind has been granted with the great blessing of the power of mind and conscience that gives us the capacity to think. As humans we have been given this blessing which allows us the ability to interrogate our lives through our thoughts, actions and behaviour so that we can use those faculties and opportunities to achieve a higher plane in our spiritual destiny. ‘Verily never will Allah change the condition of a people until they first change what is in their hearts’ (Quran 13: 11)
Once we have initiated the intention to change the journey will become easier because the Almighty will assist us in the process. ’Verily We take upon Ourselves to guide’ (Quran 92:12)
The most important gift as mentioned is that we have our mind, both conscious and subconscious, because that gives us the ability to weather trials and tribulations but more importantly the strength of will power and self-discipline to transform ourselves even in times of adversity. We have to learn to train our mind to focus on the good in our life because the Almighty will be there for us. ‘We know how thy heart is distressed, but celebrate the praises of thy Lord’ (Quran 15: 97)
We must always expect our lives to have upheavals and challenges as time marches on because there are bound to be pot holes and corrugations along the way. Ups and downs are a natural part of life and are important in keeping us going, because, as we know that a straight line even in an ECG means we are not alive.
We should learn to look at challenges as opportunities for expanding our minds and this unlocks and forces our minds into creative thinking. I read an interesting quote that says: ‘The Pessimist complains about the wind; The Optimist expects it to change; The Realist adjusts the sails’.
So we should adjust our sails to harness the positive energy in order to help us focus on overcoming the challenges along the way. Our mind is a very powerful mechanism that we should cultivate in order to give it us the positive attitudes so that we can navigate through the challenges that face us in today’s world. No doubt there are many conflicting situations in our lives.
PRIDE Many of us fall easy prey to pride because we live in a world in which we tend to show off about our worldly possessions, wealth, position and other worldly successes. ‘Exult not, for Allah loves not those who exult (in riches). (Quran 28:76). This exultation leads to pride: and this pride often leads to vanity and arrogance. Pride has been called the sin from which all others arise, this is because we develop excessive belief in our own abilities, and we tend to think that we are above others and that all that we have gained is as a result of our own doing and not through the Blessings of God.
This breeds the arrogant streak in our character and we start chasing for more of the things that our money can buy, just to show off. But we must remember that this pride will be short lived. And swell not thy cheek with pride for men. Nor walk with insolence through the earth; for God loveth not the arrogant boaster. (Quran 31: 18). ‘If we give man a taste of Our favours…..behold he falls into exultation and pride’ (Quran 11:10) The Bible also warns: “Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18).
GREED Another of those sins is that of greed, it is common that when we are blessed with a certain level of wealth we tend to become greedy for more. Greed can become such a driving force in our lives that it can cause us to resort to any means to achieve our objectives via any means and this becomes our driving force, the desire for more material wealth or gain, ignoring the realm of spirituality.
‘To whom I granted resources in abundance……, to whom I made life smooth and comfortable, yet he is greedy that I should add more……by no means, for to our signs he has been rebellious. (Quran 74:12 -16) Bible quote: “Having lost all sensitivity, they have given themselves over to sensuality so as to indulge in every kind of impurity, with a continual lust for more” (Ephesians 4:19). And: ‘….yes they are greedy dogs which can never have enough’ (Isiah 56: 11)
ENVY Envy / jealousy are very common yet deadly sins of the heart. When we see others blessed with more than us we become envious of them. We see them having been blessed with wealth, status, abilities and situations we easily become resentful of the advantage enjoyed by them and we are filled with a desire to possess the same advantage. In many cases that jealousy can turn to hatred and even wishing that those we envy may be deprived of those things. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said: ‘Keep away from jealousy, for jealousy eats up virtues the same way as fire eats up wood’. The Quran says: In no wise covet those things in which Allah has bestowed His gifts more freely on some of you than on others; to man is allotted what they earn’ (Quran 4: 32)
The Bible also advises: “Therefore, rid yourselves of all malice and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and slander of every kind. Like new born babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation” (1 Peter 2: 1-2)
Intelligence and Security Service Act, which is a law that establishes the Directorate of Intelligence and Security Service (DIS), provides for establishment of a Parliamentary Committee. Recently, the President announced nine names of Members of Parliament he had appointed to the Committee.
This announcement was preceded by a meeting the President held with the Speaker and the Leader of Opposition. Following the announcement of Committee MPs by the President, the opposition, through its leader, made it clear that it will not participate in the Committee unless certain conditions that would ensure effective oversight are met. The opposition acted on the non-participation threat through resignation of its three MPs from the Committee.
The Act at Section 38 provides for the establishment of the Committee to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Directorate. The law provides that the Parliamentary Committee shall have the same powers and privileges set out under the National Assembly (Powers and Privileges) Act.
On composition, the Committee shall consist of nine members who shall not be members of Cabinet and its quorum shall be five members. The MPs in the Committee elect a chairperson from among their number at their first meeting.
The Members of the Committee are appointed by the President after consultation with the Speaker of the National Assembly and Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly. It is the provision of the law that the Committee, relative to its size, reflect the numerical strengths of the political parties represented in the National Assembly.
The Act provides that that a member of the Committee holds office for the duration of the Parliament in which he or she is appointed. The Committee is mandated to make an annual report on the discharge of their functions to the President and may at any time report to him or her on any matter relating to the discharge of those functions.
The Minister responsible for intelligence and security is obliged to lay before the National Assembly a copy of each annual report made by the Committee together with a statement as to whether any matter has been excluded from that copy in pursuance of the provision of the Act.
If it appears to the Minister, after consultation with the Parliamentary Committee, that the publication of any matter in a report would be prejudicial to the continued discharge of the functions of the Directorate, the Minister may exclude that matter from the copy of the report as laid before the National Assembly.
So, what are the specific demands of the Opposition and why are they not participating in the Committee? What should happen as a way forward? The Opposition demanded that there be a forensic audit of the Directorate. The DIS has never been audited since it was set up in 2008, more than a decade ago.
The institution has been a law unto itself for a longtime, feared by all oversight bodies. The Auditor General, who had no security of tenure, could not audit the DIS. The Directorate’s personnel, especially at a high level, have been implicated in corruption. Some of its operatives are in courts of law defending corruption charges preferred against them. Some of the corruption cases which appeared in the media have not made it to the courts.
The DIS has been accused of non-accountability and unethical practices as well as of being a burden on the fiscus. So, the Opposition demanded, from the President, a forensic audit for the purpose of cleaning up the DIS. They demand a start from a clean slate.
The second demand by the Opposition is that the law be reviewed to ensure greater accountability of the DIS to Parliament. What are some of the issues that the opposition think should be reviewed? The contention is that the executive cannot appoint a Committee of Parliament to scrutinize an executive institution.
Already, it is argued, Parliament is less independent and it is dominated by the executive. It is contended that the Committee should be established by the Standing Orders and be appointed by a Select Committee of Parliament. There is also an argument that the Committee should report to Parliament and not to the President and that the Minister should not have any role in the Committee.
Democratic and Parliamentary oversight of the intelligence is relatively a new phenomenon across the World. Even developed democracies are still grappling with some of these issues. However, there are acceptable standards or what might be called international best practices which have evolved over the past two or so decades.
In the UK for instance, MPs of the Intelligence and Security Committee are appointed by the Houses of Parliament, having been nominated by the Prime Minister in consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. This is a good balancing exercise of involvement of both the executive and the legislature. Consultation is taken for granted in Botswana context in the sense that it has been reduced to just informing the Leader of Opposition without much regard to his or her ideas; they are never taken seriously.
Furthermore, the current Committee in the UK has four Members of the ruling party and five MPs from the opposition. It is a fairly balanced Committee in terms of Parliamentary representation. However, as said above, the President of Botswana appointed six ruling party MPs and three from the opposition.
The imbalance is preposterous and more pronounced with clear intentions of getting the executive way through the ruling party representatives in the Committee. The intention to avoid scrutiny is clear from the numbers of the ruling party MPs in the Committee.
There is also an international standard of removing sensitive parts which may harm national security from the report before it is tabled in the legislature. The previous and current reluctance of the executive arms to open up on Defence and Security matters emanate from this very reason of preserving and protecting national security.
But national security should be balanced with public interest and other democratic principles. The decision to expunge certain information which may be prejudicial to national security should not be an arbitrary and exclusive decision of the executive but a collective decision of a well fairly balanced Committee in consultation with the Speaker and the minister responsible.
There is no doubt that the DIS has been a rogue institution. The reluctance by the President to commit to democratic-parliamentary oversight reforms presupposes a lack of commitment to democratization. The President has no interest in seeing a reformed DIS with effective oversight of the agency.
He is insincere. This is because the President loathes the idea losing an iota of power and sharing it with any other democratic institution. He sees the agency as his power lever to sustain his stay in the high office. He thought he could sanitize himself with an ineffective DIS Committee that would dance to his tune.
The non-participation of the opposition MPs renders the Committee dysfunctional; it cannot function as this would be unlawful. Participation of the opposition is a legal requirement. Even if it can meet, it would lack legitimacy; it cannot be taken seriously. The President should therefore act on the oversight demands and reform the DIS if he is to be taken seriously.
For years I have trained people about paradigm shifts – those light-bulb-switch-on moments – where there is a seismic change from the usual way of thinking about something to a newer, better way.
I like to refer to them as ‘aha’ moments because of the sudden understanding of something which was previously incomprehensible. However, the topic of today’s article is the complete antithesis of ‘aha’. Though I’d love to tell you I’d had a ‘eureka ‘, ‘problem solved’ moment, I am faced with the complete opposite – an ‘oh-no’ moment or Lost Leader Syndrome.
No matter how well prepared or capable a leader is. they often find themselves facing perplexing events, confounding information, or puzzling situations. Confused by developments of which they can’t make sense and by challenges that they don’t know how to solve they become confused, sometimes lost and completely clueless about what to do.
I am told by Jentz and Murphy (JM) in ‘What leaders do when they don’t know what to do’ that this is normal, and that rapid change is making confusion a defining feature of management in the 21st century. Now doesn’t that sound like the story of 2020 summed up in a single sentence?
The basic premise of their writing is that “confusion is not a weakness to be ashamed of but a regular and inevitable condition of leadership. By learning to embrace their confusion, managers are able to set in motion a constructive process for addressing baffling issues.
In fact, confusion turns out to be a fruitful environment in which the best managers thrive by using the instability around them to open up better lines of communication, test their old assumptions and values against changing realities, and develop more creative approaches to problem solving.”
The problem with this ideology however is that it doesn’t help my overwhelming feelings of fear and panic which is exacerbated by a tape playing on a loop in my head saying ‘you’re supposed to know what to do, do something’. My angst is compounded by annoying motivational phrases also unhelpfully playing in my head like.
Nothing happens until something moves
The secret of getting ahead is getting started
Act or be acted upon
All these platitudes are urging me to pull something out of the bag, but I know that this is a trap. This need to forge ahead is nothing but a coping mechanism and disguise. Instead of owning the fact that I haven’t got a foggy about what to do, part of me worries that I’ll lose authority if I acknowledge that I can’t provide direction – I’m supposed to know the answers, I’m the MD! This feeling of not being in control is common for managers in ‘oh no’ situations and as a result they often start reflexively and unilaterally attempting to impose quick fixes to restore equilibrium because, lets be honest, sometimes we find it hard to resist hiding our confusion.
To admit that I am lost in an “Oh, No!” moment opens the door not only to the fear of losing authority but also to a plethora of other troubling emotions and thoughts: *Shame and loss of face: “You’ll look like a fool!” * Panic and loss of control: “You’ve let this get out of hand!” * Incompetence and incapacitation: “You don’t know what you’re doing!”
As if by saying “I’m at a loss here” is tantamount to declaring “I am not fit to lead.” Of course the real problem for me and any other leader is if they don’t admit when they are disoriented, it sends a signal to others in the organisation stating it’s not cool to be lost and that, by its very nature encourages them to hide. What’s the saying about ‘a real man never asks for direction. ..so they end up driving around in circles’.
As managers we need to embrace the confusion, show vulnerability (remember that’s not a bad word) and accept that leadership is not about pretending to have all the answers but about having the courage to search with others to discover a solution.
JM point out that “being confused, however, does not mean being incapacitated. Indeed, one of the most liberating truths of leadership is that confusion is not quicksand from which to escape but rather the potter’s clay of leadership – the very stuff with which managers can work.”
2020 has certainly been a year to remember and all indications are that the confusion which has characterised this year will still follow us into the New Year, thereby making confusion a defining characteristic of the new normal and how managers need to manage. Our competence as leaders will then surely be measured not only by ‘what I know’ but increasingly by ‘how I behave when I accept, I don’t know, lose my sense of direction and become confused.
.I guess the message for all organizational cultures going forward is that sticking with the belief that we need all-knowing, omni-competent executives will cost them dearly and send a message to managers that it is better to hide their confusion than to address it openly and constructively.
Take comfort in these wise words ‘Confusion is a word we have invented for an order not yet understood’!