Simon Zelotes and Helena Salome were one of the most fervidly ambitious partners of their time. Simon Zelotes wanted to be High Priest in a liberated Israel and Helena-Salome wanted to be High Priestess although officially there wasn’t such an office.
To make a reality of their ends – or near enough – the couple needed to tactfully get rid of people who stood in the way and to cultivate strategic alliances with men of clout. Their main stumbling block had been John the Baptist, who they had already taken care of. The allies of overarching influence were Jesus, the Davidic messiah, and Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee.
Since the death of John the Baptist, Simon Zelotes had become the Father/Pope of the Essene community, which almost certainly guaranteed him the national high priesthood in a liberated Israel. Helena-Salome was the female head of the order of Asher. As an ecclesiastical minister, her Essene title was that of cardinal/archbishop owing in the main to her wisdom and scintillating education. This was Grade 3, the fourth from the top, after Simon Zelotes, Judas Iscariot, and Jesus. Her two adopted sons, James Niceta and John Aquila, were part of the 12-man inner circle of Jesus, which guaranteed them plum positions in the Cabinet of an independent Israel.
But Helena was not content with all that. She wanted more. She wanted to be the Queen Mother in a self-governing Israel and there was only one way to attain to that – by getting her daughter hitched to the Davidic King, Jesus. The ideal spouse for a Davidic King was a fellow Jew and somebody from a royal line, preferably the Hasmonean line. To a Gentile Helena, however, who was a Canaanite from Syro-Phoenicia, this was not a handicap considering that in Jesus’s own geneology could be found Gentile women.
For example, Tamah, the mother of all the Kings of Judah, was a Canaanite like her; Ruth, the great-grandmother of King David, was a Moabite. As if that was not odd enough, Rahab, the great-great grandmother of King David, was a prostitute and Bathsheba, David’s Queen, was an adulterer. In fact, Jesus for one was a cosmopolitan person who did not see himself as the future King of Israel as such but as the future King of Kings – emperor of the world. So to marry a Gentile would not be a big deal for him.
There was an even stronger case for her daughter Mary to marry Jesus. Her father was a god, that is, an Anunnaki, and so she was even more royal than the purest Jewish woman alive at the time. So with all these aces up her sleeve, Helena decided to pitch her daughter directly to Jesus. She could not do this through his mother Mary because Mary probably already had somebody else in mind who like her was a Jew and was of noble lineage.
HELENA’S OVERTURE TO JESUS
The series of incidents in which Helena-Salome propositions her daughter to Jesus and succeeds is cryptically told in the stories of the healing/raising of Jairus’s daughter (MATTHEW 9:18-26/MARK 5:35-43/LUKE 8:40-56); the encounter with the Syro-Phoenician Woman (MATTHEW 15:21-29/MARK 7:24-30); and the healing of the Menstruous Woman (MATTHEW 9:20-21/MARK5:25-32/LUKE 8:40-56).
The Matthew version in regard to the healing of the Jairus daughter reads as follows:
21 “And Jesus having come forth from there, withdrew to the parts of Tyre and Sidon,
22 and lo, a woman, a Canaanite, from those borders having come forth, did call to him, saying, "Deal kindly with me, Sir, Son of David; my daughter is miserably demonized."
23 And he did not answer her a word; and his disciples having come to him, were asking him, saying, "Let her away, because she cries after us;" 24and he answering said, "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
25 And having come, she was bowing to him, saying, "Sir, help me;"
26 and he answering said, "It is not good to take the children's bread, and to cast to the little dogs
27 And she said, "Yes, sir, for even the dogs do eat of the crumbs that are falling from their lords" table;"
28 then answering, Jesus said to her, "O woman, great [is] your faith, let it be to you as you will;" and her daughter was healed from that hour.
29 And Jesus having passed from there, came near unto the Sea of Galilee, and having gone up to the mountain, he was sitting there,
39 And having let away the multitudes, he went into the boat, and did come to the borders of Magadan.”
The story concerns a unnamed woman and her unnamed daughter. The woman has three characteristics. First, she is a Gentile, a Canaanite. In the other gospels, she is described as a Greek (to underline her great learning) and a Syro-Phoenician woman. In the story, Jesus refers to her as a “dog”.
This was a metaphor for Gentiles, just as sheep was a metaphor for Jews. Second, Jesus encountered her in Tyre and Sidon. Again this emphasised her place of origin, in modern-day Lebanon. The incident did not take place in Lebanon but in the Judean wilderness at Ain Feshka. Tyre and Sidon were interchangeable code names for Ain Feshka in the Essene lexicon.
Third, her daughter was “miserably demonised”. This had nothing to do with her being possessed of evil spirits. It simply meant that she was under the tutelage of the Seven Essene Zealots who were headed by Judas Iscariot, who as the seniormost of the seven was referred to as Demon No. 7.
Thus what Helena was saying to Jesus was that her daughter could not be released from the Judas convent unless he (Jesus) agreed to take her hand in marriage. Jesus did equivocate though, aware of the implications of a Davidic Messiah marrying a Gentile (that explains why his disciples had made it very difficult for her to see Jesus) but Helena was so convincing he finally capitulated: she was not regarded as a goddess incarnate just for the fun of it.
It is telling that at the conclusion of the story, Jesus heads for Magadan. Magadan was one of the Essene code names for Mazin in the Qumran precincts. It was where the women’s order of Dan, the order to which Mary Magdalene belonged, where housed. The encrypted meaning here is that Jesus proceeded there to officially propose to Mary Magdalene.
The story of the Syro-Phoenician woman is also related in the Clementine literature, where Helena-Salome is addressed by her much more ambitious name of Justa, meaning “royal heiress” or “future Queen”.
JESUS ACCEPTS PROPOSITION
The healing of the woman with an issue of blood is related in all the three synoptic gospels, which points to it’s being a pivotal event. Once again, the story is not exactly the way it appears at surface. It was a high-stakes one, with Jesus as the party it impacted the most.
In a nutshell, it concerns a woman who had had an abnormal menstrual order for twelve years, during which the menses never lapsed. But when she sought Jesus and touched the helm of his garment, she was instantly healed. Sadly for my brothers and sisters in Christ, the woman had no such affliction and there was therefore no miracle about her story. The underlying story according to the pesher, plus some diaphanous extra-biblical facts, is as follows:
The woman in question was Helena-Salome. The surface, 12-year menstrual disorder had to do with the fact that for 12 years now, she had never copulated with any man. If you recall, she had been impregnated at the Temple of Artemis whilst a Vestal Virgin by a “god” and had thereafter sworn never to indulge in sexual relations ever again even if she legally got married. Not having had known a man for 12 years was tantamount to having a disorder that forbade such activity – an indefinite issue of menstruum.
There was yet another aspect to the blood symbolism. As the woman head of the Essenes’ order of Asher, Helena’s title initially was that of Sarah-Salome, which was equivalent to a lay priestess. In effecting this role, she performed communal prayers only during a new moon – when the moon’s dark face was facing the Earth and so was not seen (Helena’s other name was Lunar, meaning “moon”). This was equated to shedding blood once every month, like a normal menstrual period.
In due course, Helena was promoted to a Martha, which conferred on her full priestly status as opposed to a lay priestess. As a Martha, she was under obligation to perform sacrifices of prayer every day, suggesting the image of a woman with a menstrual disorder.
When the Essenes read the gospel accounts in the first century, they knew exactly who the woman was in the story because they were familiar with the coded language. They also knew what the story really was about. The blood symbolism and the 12 years was to identify her.
Her “healing” by Jesus was simply a coded way of saying Jesus had elevated her from the Gentile she was to a honorary Jew, what Paul described as “being grafted onto the nation of Israel”. She was thus now officially eligible to be her mother-in-law.
Such a conversion ritual, however, was supposed to be done by John the Baptist, who was the priestly messiah (this event happened in August AD 29, before the arrest of the Baptist), and not by the Davidic messiah. That Jesus thought it incumbent upon himself to perform the ritual demonstrates how at odds the two messiahs were with each other at the time.
THE CLEMENTINE TESTAMENT
Helena-Salome’s successful pitching of her daughter Mary Magdalene to Jesus is corroborated in the Clementine literature. This is what the Clementine Homilies say on this and other related subjects:
“She (Helena), therefore, having taken up a manner of life according to the law, was, with the daughter (Mary Magdalene) who had been healed, driven out from her home by her husband (Syro the Jairus) whose sentiments were opposed to ours (Helena was a Temple Virgin for Artemis, who was tricked into having sex with a man disguised as a god and let go by the priest).
But she, being faithful to her engagements, and being in affluent circumstances (supported by Julia the Elder), remained a widow herself (abstaining from sex), but gave her daughter (Mary Magdalene) in marriage to a certain man who was attached to the true faith (Jesus!), and who was poor (member of the Essenes who referred to themselves as the Poor).
And, abstaining from marriage for the sake of her daughter, she bought two boys (James Niceta and John Aquila) and educated them, and had them in place of sons. And they being educated from their boyhood with Simon Magus (Simon Zelotes, their godfather as well as putative stepfather), having had learned all things concerning him. For such was their friendship, that they were associated with him in all things in which he wished to unite with them.”
Exactly how did Jesus and Mary Magdalene come to get married? You don’t have to look elsewhere folks: it’s all in the Bible in plain daylight. In case you have been unable to unravel it, we undertake to do it for you in the next installment.
In 2005, the Business & Economic Advisory Council (BEAC) pitched the idea of the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) to the Mogae Administration.
It took five years before the SEZ policy was formulated, another five years before the relevant law was enacted, and a full three years before the Special Economic Zones Authority (SEZA) became operational.
… courtesy of infiltration stratagem by Jehovah-Enlil’s clan
With the passing of Joshua’s generation, General Atiku, the promised peace and prosperity of a land flowing with milk and honey disappeared, giving way to chaos and confusion.
Maybe Joshua himself was to blame for this shambolic state of affairs. He had failed to mentor a successor in the manner Moses had mentored him. He had left the nation without a central government or a human head of state but as a confederacy of twelve independent tribes without any unifying force except their Anunnaki gods.
If I say the word ‘robot’ to you, I can guess what would immediately spring to mind – a cute little Android or animal-like creature with human or pet animal characteristics and a ‘heart’, that is to say to say a battery, of gold, the sort we’ve all seen in various movies and tv shows. Think R2D2 or 3CPO in Star Wars, Wall-E in the movie of the same name, Sonny in I Robot, loveable rogue Bender in Futurama, Johnny 5 in Short Circuit…
Of course there are the evil ones too, the sort that want to rise up and eliminate us inferior humans – Roy Batty in Blade Runner, Schwarzenegger’s T-800 in The Terminator, Box in Logan’s Run, Police robots in Elysium and Otomo in Robocop.
And that’s to name but a few. As a general rule of thumb, the closer the robot is to human form, the more dangerous it is and of course the ultimate threat in any Sci-Fi movie is that the robots will turn the tables and become the masters, not the mechanical slaves. And whilst we are in reality a long way from robotic domination, there are an increasing number of examples of robotics in the workplace.
ROBOT BLOODHOUNDS Sometimes by the time that one of us smells something the damage has already begun – the smell of burning rubber or even worse, the smell of deadly gas. Thank goodness for a robot capable of quickly detecting and analyzing a smell from our very own footprint.
A*Library Bot The A*Star (Singapore) developed library bot which when books are equipped with RFID location chips, can scan shelves quickly seeking out-of-place titles. It manoeuvres with ease around corners, enhances the sorting and searching of books, and can self-navigate the library facility during non-open hours.
DRUG-COMPOUNDING ROBOT Automated medicine distribution system, connected to the hospital prescription system. It’s goal? To manipulate a large variety of objects (i.e.: drug vials, syringes, and IV bags) normally used in the manual process of drugs compounding to facilitate stronger standardisation, create higher levels of patient safety, and lower the risk of hospital staff exposed to toxic substances.
AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY ROBOTS Applications include screw-driving, assembling, painting, trimming/cutting, pouring hazardous substances, labelling, welding, handling, quality control applications as well as tasks that require extreme precision,
AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS Ecrobotix, a Swiss technology firm has a solar-controlled ‘bot that not only can identify weeds but thereafter can treat them. Naio Technologies based in southwestern France has developed a robot with the ability to weed, hoe, and assist during harvesting. Energid Technologies has developed a citrus picking system that retrieves one piece of fruit every 2-3 seconds and Spain-based Agrobot has taken the treachery out of strawberry picking. Meanwhile, Blue River Technology has developed the LettuceBot2 that attaches itself to a tractor to thin out lettuce fields as well as prevent herbicide-resistant weeds. And that’s only scratching the finely-tilled soil.
INDUSTRIAL FLOOR SCRUBBERS The Global Automatic Floor Scrubber Machine boasts a 1.6HP motor that offers 113″ water lift, 180 RPM and a coverage rate of 17,000 sq. ft. per hour
These examples all come from the aptly-named site www.willrobotstakemyjob.com because while these functions are labour-saving and ripe for automation, the increasing use of artificial intelligence in the workplace will undoubtedly lead to increasing reliance on machines and a resulting swathe of human redundancies in a broad spectrum of industries and services.
This process has been greatly boosted by the global pandemic due to a combination of a workforce on furlough, whether by decree or by choice, and the obvious advantages of using virus-free machines – I don’t think computer viruses count! For example, it was suggested recently that their use might have a beneficial effect in care homes for the elderly, solving short staffing issues and cheering up the old folks with the novelty of having their tea, coffee and medicines delivered by glorified model cars. It’s a theory, at any rate.
Already,customers at the South-Korean fast-food chain No Brand Burger can avoid any interaction with a human server during the pandemic. The chain is using robots to take orders, prepare food and bring meals out to diners. Customers order and pay via touchscreen, then their request is sent to the kitchen where a cooking machine heats up the buns and patties. When it’s ready, a robot ‘waiter’ brings out their takeout bag.
‘This is the first time I’ve actually seen such robots, so they are really amazing and fun,’ Shin Hyun Soo, an office worker at No Brand in Seoul for the first time, told the AP.
Human workers add toppings to the burgers and wrap them up in takeout bags before passing them over to yellow-and-black serving robots, which have been compared to Minions.
Also in Korea, the Italian restaurant chain Mad for Garlic is using serving robots even for sit-down customers. Using 3D space mapping and other technology, the electronic ‘waiter,’ known as Aglio Kim, navigates between tables with up to five orders. Mad for Garlic manager Lee Young-ho said kids especially like the robots, which can carry up to 66lbs in their trays.
These catering robots look nothing like their human counterparts – in fact they are nothing more than glorified food trolleys so using our thumb rule from the movies, mankind is safe from imminent takeover but clearly Korean hospitality sector workers’ jobs are not.
And right there is the dichotomy – replacement by stealth. Remote-controlled robotic waiters and waitresses don’t need to be paid, they don’t go on strike and they don’t spread disease so it’s a sure bet their army is already on the march.
But there may be more redundancies on the way as well. Have you noticed how AI designers have an inability to use words of more than one syllable? So ‘robot’ has become ‘bot’ and ‘android’ simply ‘droid? Well, guys, if you continue to build machines ultimately smarter than yourselves you ‘rons may find yourself surplus to requirements too – that’s ‘moron’ to us polysyllabic humans”!