Connect with us

The Jesus Dynasty – The Lord had four brothers and three sisters

Benson C Saili

In his gospel, Luke relates that at the conclusion of Jesus’s Bar Mitzvah ceremony, Joseph and his family headed back to “Nazareth” in   “Galilee”.  To the superficial reader, that is “obvious” enough: it was the village of Nazareth in the province of Galilee. It wasn’t. Anybody who settles for the surface meaning of gospel narratives and takes that as the ultimate truth will never have the slightest smattering about the historical Jesus. The real Jesus story has to be deciphered using the pesher instrument.

Logic itself makes nonsense of the Holy family’s return to Galilee. Remember, the reason they sought refuge in Galilee was to escape the machinations of Herod Archelaus. Now that Archelaus was no longer in power, there was utterly no need for Joseph to beat a path back to Galilee. Furthermore, we have already underscored the fact that the village of Nazareth did not exist during gospel times.

Nazareth, according to the pesher – the underlying story encoded in the surface narrative as per deliberate design on the part of the Essenes – referred  to any of those settlements in the Judean wilderness that were inhabited by Nazarites. Nazarites were  Essenes who had taken a vow of special consecration to God and were celibates of varying periods of abstinence.

One such Nazareth was Mird. At this juncture, Mird was also referred to as Galilee since the Essene Bishop of Galilee was present, having arrived to celebrate the Passover feast which would soon be underway.  You will be aware by now that if a certain VIP was visiting a place in the Qumran prencincts, or a particular sub–sect of the Essenes were at that point in time concentrated in that particular place, it was called after their name in their honour.

For example, Qumran was at times referred to as Egypt in that the Theraputae, whose headquarters was in the Egyptian city of Alexandria, now abounded there.  Such a system of naming on the part of the Essenes was contrived: it was meant to confuse the Romans as well as the Jewish establishment in Jerusalem, particularly the Herodians.  

After siring Jesus and James, Joseph and Mary had six more children – three sons and three daughters. Their last born was a son, who was born in AD 22, the year before Joseph passed on. The order in which the children between James and the last born came is not documented. However, the Bible furnishes some hint as to the sequence in which the boys arrived and extra-biblical sources offer an idea as to the order in which the girls came.  

The boys in descending order of seniority were Jesus, James, Joseph, Jude, and Simon (MARK 6:3 and MATTHEW 13:55-56). Christians claim they read the Bible everyday but if you were to ask any single one of them as to whether Jesus had siblings, almost all would recoil at the absurdity of such a suggestion.  Pastors hardly ever preach about Jesus’s family: throughout my more than 30 years as a Christian, I have never heard a single sermon on the brothers of Jesus, not even on James, who was actually the spiritual “superstar” post-Calvary.

James’s given name was Cleopas. He was named after his uncle, one of Joseph’s twin brothers. As an adult, however, he was best known as James (Iah-mes in Aramaic, or Mes-iah the other way round) and as Jacob. Both names were titular. As James, he was the recognised messiah by the Palestinian Jews and the priestly family of Boethus because he was born procedurally and in the right month, September.

The Essenes and the Diaspora Jews, on the other hand, subscribed to Jesus as the true Davidic messiah. On his part, James was content to be only next in line after Jesus but the politics of the day caused him to vacillate from time to time, particularly that his mother Mary tacitly promoted him as the politically palatable messiah.

After the ostensible crucifixion of Jesus, James became the uncontested David King de facto. It was then that he assumed the name Jacob. Jacob was the title of the Davidic messiah since the time of Jesus’ grandfather Jacob-Heli. Before the crucifixion but after the death of his father, James’s other title was Joseph. Joseph was the title of the crown prince as indeed James was next in line after Jesus.  It was James who succeeded Jesus as leader of the Jesus movement and not Paul or Simon Peter as Christendom wrongly believes. James is the author of the New Testament’s epistle of James. More will be said about James as the Jesus Papers progress.

When James became the Jacob after the crucifixion, his immediate younger brother accordingly  became the Joseph, the name by which he was best-known. Other people abbreviated it and so addressed him as Joses (in today’s parlance we say “Joe”). His other names were Barsabbas and Justus. Following the death of Judas Iscariot, Joses made an unsuccessful tilt  at replacing him among the Twelve: he was outvoted  by a certain Matthias in a succession poll.

Jude is another rendering of the name Judas. Like Joses, Jude was sometimes referred to as Barsabbas, this being a titular surname of the sons of Joseph (Barsabbas means “Son of Seb”. Seb is another abbreviation of the name Joseph, the emphasis being on the “Seph” syllable). Jude is the writer of the epistle that comes just before Revelation

Simon, the lastborn, was best known as Silas, or Silvanus, in old age. It was he who replaced Barnabbas when the latter felt out with Paul. He was specially prized by Paul and the early church as he was a bold evangelist and a man of the people, very much like his elder brother Jesus. Once, he was even detained with Paul. If you thought the brothers of Jesus were peripheral to his ecumenical cause, you are in error: they were actually front and centre of the Jesus movement.

Although the three sisters of Jesus are not expressly specified as such in the gospels, they do make a kind of cameo appearance. Their names were  Mary, Salome, and Joanna. All the three were present at the scene of the crucifixion according to the gospels. They are mentioned in  MARK 15:47 and MATTHEW 28:1. Outside the canon, Epiphanius of Salamis (310-403 AD) mentioned them in his two works titled Panarion  and Ancoratus, as well as Apostolic Constitutions, a fourth century book by one of the church fathers.  Two apocryphal works, the Gospel of Phillip and the Protoevangelion of James, also makes mention of the sisters of Jesus by name.

According to a Dead Sea Scroll named the Damascus Document, the brothers of Jesus were collectively referred to as the Princes of Judah among the Essene community.  

It has been said Jesus was not  educated though he was strikingly sharp, wise,  and knowledgeable. The truth is, Jesus underwent both formal and informal education. He did formal education at Qumran and not in a formal rabbinical school of the day.

The Essenes had a virtual continuous education process that ran practically all the way to age 30. The initial phase commenced at age 13 through age 18. It was segmented into elementary school at ages 13 and 14; middle elementary school at age 15; higher elementary school at age 16 and 17; and monastic education at age 18. The second phase began at age 24 and ended at age 27, the graduation age in respect of general academia.  At age 28 commenced priestly education, which ended at age 30, when the highest grade was attained. What exactly did the Essenes teach in their exclusive academies in the Judean wilderness?

Evidently, the subjects must have included mathematics, numerology, astrology, astronomy, philosophy, gnosticism, spirituality and natural as well as spiritual healing. We know the Essenes studied the stars and the planets because the signs of the Zodiac constitute part and parcel of the Dead Sea texts. 

Everything the Essenes did  had to conform  to mathematical propriety, ranging from the numerical equivalent of their titles to the distances between their settlements to the architecture of their Qumran temple. According to Flavius Josephus, the first century’s prima donna historian, Essenes were advocates of the famous Greek philosopher and mathematician Pythagoras (we all know what Pythogoras Theorem is, don’t we?). The Essenes were specially interested in the mathematics which governed the order of the cosmos.

Their culture was to a large extent dominated by Pythagorean thought, the influence by and large of  the Magi of West Manasseh and the Egyptian Theraputae. Josephus also records that the Essenes were practiced in the art of healing and received their therapeutic knowledge of roots and stones from the ancients. Certainly, the term Essene, a English rendering, must refer to this expertise as the Aramaic word Assaya meant physician and corresponded to the Greek word Essenoi.

In light of the above information, we now can understand why Jesus was so intellectually arresting  and why he was a renowned  healer and seer. This was nothing supernatural: it was not the result of his being a  God-Man. It was all a learnt endowment, acquired through a rigorous educational process which left no stone unturned – pun intended. Jesus was not only a spiritual/natural  healer but was a herbalist and even threw bones! If he lived in our time, we would not only call him an itinerant preacher but a fortune teller and Sangoma rolled into one.

The gospels relate an incident (LUKE 41-50) where Jesus, aged 12, was left behind at the Jerusalem Temple at the conclusion of the Passover festival and when his parents returned to fetch him, they found him engaged in an intellectual slugfest with learned old geezers. 

The passage reads as follows in part: “They found him in the temple courts, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. [47] Everyone who heard him was amazed at his understanding and his answers. [48] When his parents saw him, they were astonished. His mother said to him, ‘Son, why have you treated us like this? Your father and I have been anxiously searching for you.’  [49] ‘Why were you searching for me?’ he asked. ‘Didn't you know I had to be in my Father's house?’ [50] But they did not understand what he was saying to them.”

Taken on face value, the above narrative is certain to be misunderstood. It can only be correctly grasped once one has read it through the pesher lenses and is familiar with the contents of the Dead Sea Scrolls as well as the happenings in and the politics of the first century as documented by contemporary historians. Jesus was not 12 years old: he was 23 and the year was AD 17. In AD 6, when he actually turned 12, the Essenes had introduced an unofficial parallel calendar. 

AD 6 was a particularly dark year for them. Firstly, the Romans had assumed direct rule of Judea. Secondly, they had lost two of their shining beacons, High Priest Zechariah and Zealot Commander Judas of Galilee. They thus designated the year AD 6 as the Year of Wrath. Furthermore, they styled it as Year 1 in the parallel calendar.  According to this calendar, Jesus was 12 years old in AD 17 though he was factually 23 years old.

Jesus had turned 20 in AD 14 and was conferred Grade 10 in the Essene pecking order. According to the Essene ascetic rule, he was at this age eligible for marriage and had to choose whether to indeed marry and lead a conventional, mainstream   life or adopt a celibate lifestyle under the tutelage of the Essene sages.

In AD 14, Annas was still High Priest and so Jesus was still recognised as the Davidic heir. He therefore chose a celibate life style and being a dynastic heir, it meant he would only marry at age 36.  In AD 17, he turned 23 and having chosen a celibate lifestyle he become an initiate, or a Grade 7 Essene.  This was the age at which the Essene acknowledged one as a “man”: prior to this, one was still a “child” or “novice”.

The first stage of the Grade 7 ceremony was a second baptism, the first one having taken place at age 21.  Joseph and Mary attended Jesus’ baptism ceremony in Jerusalem, then went ahead of him for the full initiation before rightwing Essenes at Mar Saba in the Judean wilderness. Jesus, however, stayed in Jerusalem to be initated by the metropolitan Essenes at the Essene Gate. What this entailed was simply the taking of an oral examination before a panel of priests.

It was at the Essene Gate where his parents finally located him after waiting for him at Mar Saba for three days. Rather than be awestruck by the intellectual prowess with which he transfixed the “professors”, they were mystified by his defiant attitude toward them when he had been so unfailingly heedful all along.  

His response upon being interrupted by his parents that “I must be in my father’s house” has also been misinterpreted and unduly spiritualised.  By “father”, he alluded to the incumbent High Priest Eleazer, the son of the now former High Priest Annas. All the Annas priests used the titles “Father” and “God”, just as the Pope uses the title “Holy Father”, and all of them advocated cooperation with Rome. 

Thus the statement “I must be in my father’s house” was a philosophical one: it meant Jesus felt obligated to stick by the peace-with-the-Romans ethos of Eleazer rather than proceed with Joseph to Mar Saba and be initiated by the militaristic, anti-Roman Essene faction.   


Continue Reading



10th February 2023

Speaking at a mental health breakfast seminar last week I emphasised to the HR managerial audience that you cannot yoga your way out of a toxic work culture. What I meant by that was that as HR practitioners we must avoid tending to look at the soft options to address mental health issues, distractions such as yoga and meditation. That’s like looking for your lost bunch of keys, then opening the front door with the spare under the mat.  You’ve solved the immediate problem, but all the other keys are still missing.   Don’t get me wrong; mindfulness practices, yoga exercise and taking time to smell the roses all have their place in mental wellness but it’s a bit like hacking away at the blight-ridden leaves of the tree instead of getting to the root cause of the problem.

Another point I stressed was that mental health at work shouldn’t be looked at from the individual lens – yet that’s what we do. We have counselling of employees, wellness webinars or talks but if you really want to sort out the mental health crisis that we face in our organisations you HAVE to view this more systemically and that means looking at the system and that starts with the leaders and managers.

Now. shining a light on management may not be welcomed by many. But leaders control the flow of work and set the goals and expectations that others need to live up to. Unrealistic expectations, excessive workloads and tight deadlines increase stress and force people to work longer hours … some of the things which contribute to poor mental health. Actually, we know from research exactly what contributes to a poor working environment – discrimination and inequality, excessive workloads, low job control and job insecurity – all of which pose a risk to mental health. The list goes on and is pretty exhaustive but here are the major ones: under-use of skills or being under-skilled for work; excessive workloads or work pace, understaffing; long, unsocial or inflexible hours; lack of control over job design or workload; organizational culture that enables negative behaviours; limited support from colleagues or authoritarian supervision; discrimination and exclusion; unclear job role; under- or over-promotion; job insecurity.

And to my point no amount of yoga is going to change that.

We can use the word ‘toxic’ to describe dysfunctional work environments and if our workplaces are toxic we have to look at the people who set the tone. Harder et al. (2014) define a toxic work environment as an environment that negatively impacts the viability of an organization. They specify: “It is reasonable to conclude that an organization can be considered toxic if it is ineffective as well as destructive to its employees”.

Micromanagement and/or failure to reward or recognize performance are the most obvious signs of toxic managers. These managers can be controlling, inflexible, rigid,  close-minded, and lacking in self-awareness. And let’s face it managers like those I have just described are plentiful. Generally, however there is often a failure by higher management to address toxic leaders when they are considered to be high performing. This kind of situation can be one of the leading causes of unhappiness in teams. I have coached countless employees who talk about managers with bullying ways which everyone knows about, yet action is never taken. It’s problematic when we overlook unhealthy dynamics and behaviours  because of high productivity or talent as it sends a clear message that the behaviour is acceptable and that others on the team will not be supported by leadership.

And how is the HR Manager viewed when they raise the unacceptable behaviour with the CEO – they are accused of not being a team player, looking for problems or failing to understand business dynamics and the need to get things done.  Toxic management is a systemic problem caused when companies create cultures around high-performance and metrics vs. long-term, sustainable, healthy growth. In such instances the day-to-day dysfunction is often ignored for the sake of speed and output. While short-term gains are rewarded, executives fail to see the long-term impact of protecting a toxic, but high-performing, team or employee. Beyond this, managers promote unhealthy workplace behaviour when they recognize and reward high performers for going above and beyond, even when that means rewarding the road to burnout by praising a lack of professional boundaries (like working during their vacation and after hours).

The challenge for HR Managers is getting managers to be honest with themselves and their teams about the current work environment. Honesty is difficult, I’m afraid, especially with leaders who are overly sensitive, emotional, or cannot set healthy boundaries. But here’s the rub – no growth or change can occur if denial and defensiveness are used to protect egos.  Being honest about these issues helps garner trust among employees, who already know the truth about what day-to-day dynamics are like at work. They will likely be grateful that cultural issues will finally be addressed. Conversely, if they aren’t addressed, retention failure is the cost of protecting egos of those in management.

Toxic workplace culture comes at a huge price: even before the Great Resignation, turnover related to toxic workplaces cost US employers almost $50 billion yearly! I wonder what it’s costing us here.


We can use the word ‘toxic’ to describe dysfunctional work environments and if our workplaces are toxic we have to look at the people who set the tone. Harder et al. (2014) define a toxic work environment as an environment that negatively impacts the viability of an organization. They specify: “It is reasonable to conclude that an organization can be considered toxic if it is ineffective as well as destructive to its employees”.

Continue Reading


Heartache for Kelly Fisher

9th February 2023

o date, Princess Diana, General Atiku, had destroyed one marriage, come close to ruining another one in the offing, and now was poised to wreck yet another marriage that was already in the making. This was between Dodi Fayed and the American model Kelly Fisher.

If there was one common denominator about Diana and Dodi besides their having been born with a silver spoon in their mouths, General, it was that both were divorcees. Dodi’s matrimonial saga, however, was less problematic and acrimonious and lasted an infinitesimal 8 months. This was with yet another American model and film actress going by the name Susanne Gregard.

Dodi met Susanne in 1986, when she was only 26 years old. Like most glamourous women, she proved not to be that easy a catch and to readily incline her towards positively and expeditiously responding to his rather gallant advances, Dodi booked her as a model for the Fayed’s London  mega store Harrods, where he had her travel every weekend by Concorde.  They married at a rather private ceremony at Dodi’s Colorado residence in 1987 on New Year’s Day, without the blessings, bizarrely, of his all-powerful  father.  By September the same year, the marriage was, for reasons that were not publicised but likely due to the fact that his father had not sanctioned it,  kaput.

It would take ten more years for Dodi to propose marriage to another woman, who happened to be Kelly Fisher this time around.




Kelly and Dodi, General, met in Paris in July 1996, when Kelly was only 29 years old. In a sort of whirlwind romance, the duo fell in love, becoming a concretised item in December and formally getting  engaged in February 1997.

Of course the relationship was not only about mutual love: the material element was a significant, if not vital, factor.  Kelly was to give up her modelling  job just  so she could spend a lot more time with  the new man in her life and for that she was to be handed out a compensatory reward amounting to   $500,000. The engagement ring for one, which was a diamond and sapphire affair, set back Dodi in the order of    $230,000. Once they had wedded, on August 9 that very year as per plan, they were to live in a $7 million 5-acre  Malibu Beach mansion in California, which Dodi’s father had bought him for that and an entrepreneurial purpose.  They were already even talking about embarking on making a family from the get-go: according to Kelly, Dodi wanted two boys at the very least.

Kelly naturally had the unambiguous blessings of her father-in-law as there was utterly nothing Dodi could do without the green light from the old man. When Mohamed Al Fayed was contemplating buying the Jonikal, the luxurious yacht, he invited Dodi and Kelly to inspect it too and hear their take  on it.

If there was a tell-tale red flag about Dodi ab initio, General, it had to do with a $200,000 cheque he issued to Kelly as part payment of the pledged $500,000 and which was dishonoured by the bank. Throughout their 13-month-long romance, Dodi made good on only $60,000 of the promised sum.  But love, as they say, General, is blind and Kelly did not care a jot about her beau’s financial indiscretions. It was enough that he was potentially a very wealthy man anyway being heir to his father’s humongous fortune.


                                              KELLY CONSIGNED TO “BOAT CAGE”                 


In that summer of the year 1997, General, Dodi and Kelly were to while away quality time  on the French Rivierra as well as the Jonikal after Paris. Then Dodi’s dad weighed in and put a damper on this prospect in a telephone call to Dodi on July 14. “Dodi said he was going to London and he’d be back and then we were going to San Tropez,” Kelly told the interviewer in a later TV programme.  “That evening he didn’t call me and I finally got him on his portable phone. I said, ‘Dodi where are you?’ and he said he was in London. I said, ‘Ok, I’ll call you right back at your apartment’. He said, ‘No, no, don’t call me back’. So I said, ‘Dodi where are you?’ and he admitted he was in the south of France. His father had asked him to come down and not bring me, I know now.”

Since Dodi could no longer hide from Kelly and she on her part just could not desist from badgering him, he had no option but to dispatch a private Fayed  jet to pick her up so that she join him forthwith in St. Tropez.  This was on July 16.

Arriving in St. Tropez, Kelly, General, did not lodge at the Fayed’s seaside villa as was her expectation but was somewhat stashed in the Fayed’s maritime fleet, first in the Sakara, and later in the Cujo, which was moored only yards from the Fayed villa. It was in the Cujo Kelly  spent the next two nights with Dodi.  “She (Kelly) felt there was something strange going on as Dodi spent large parts of the day at the family’s villa, Castel St. Helene, but asked her to stay on the boat,” writes Martyn Gregory in The Diana Conspiracy Exposed. “Dodi was sleeping with Kelly at night and was courting Diana by day. His deception was assisted by Kelly Fisher’s modelling assignment on 18-20 July in Nice. The Fayed’s were happy to lend her the Cujo and its crew for three days to take her there.”

Dodi’s behaviour clearly was curious, General. “Dodi would say, ‘I’m going to the house and I’ll be back in half an hour’,” Kelly told Gregory. “And he’d come back three or four hours later. I was furious. I’m sitting on the boat, stuck. And he was having lunch with everyone. So he had me in my little boat cage, and I now know he was seducing Diana. So he had me, and then he would go and try and seduce her, and then he’d come back the next day and it would happen again. I was livid by this point, and I just didn’t understand what was going on. When he was with me, he was so wonderful. He said he loved me, and we talked to my mother, and we were talking about moving into the house in California.”

But as is typical of the rather romantically gullible  tenderer sex, General, Kelly rationalised her man’s stratagems. “I just thought they maybe didn’t want a commoner around the Princess … Dodi kept leaving me behind with the excuse that the Princess didn’t like to meet new people.” During one of those nights, General, Dodi even had unprotected sexual relations with Kelly whilst cooing in her ear that, “I love you so  much and I want you to have my baby.”




On July 20, General, Diana returned to England and it was only then that Dodi allowed Kelly to come aboard the Jonikal.  According to Debbie Gribble, who was the Jonikal’s chief  stewardess, Kelly was kind of grumpy. “I had no idea at the time who she was,  but I felt she acted very spoiled,” she says in Trevor Rees-Jones’ The Bodyguard’s Story. “I remember vividly that she snapped, ‘I want to eat right now. I don’t want a drink, I just want to eat now’. It was quite obvious that she was upset, angry or annoyed about something.”

Kelly’s irascible manner of course was understandable, General,  given the games Dodi had been playing with her since she pitched up in St. Tropez. Granted, what happened to Kelly was very much antithetical to Dodi’s typically well-mannered nature, but the fact of the matter was that she simply was peripheral to the larger agenda, of which Dodi’s father was the one calling the shots.

On July 23, Dodi and Kelly flew to Paris, where they parted as Kelly had some engagements lined up in Los Angeles. Dodi promised to join her there on August 4 to celebrate with her her parents’ marriage anniversary.  Dodi, however, General, did not make good on his promise: though he did candidly own up to the fact that he was at that point in time again with Diana, he also fibbed that he was not alone with her but was partying with her along with Elton John and George Michael. But in a August 6 phone call, he did undertake to Kelly that he would be joining her    in LA in a few days’ time. In the event, anyway, General, Kelly continued to ready herself for her big day, which was slated for August 9 – until she saw “The Kiss”.




“The Kiss”, General, first featured in London’s Sunday Mirror on August 10 under that very headline. In truth, General, it was not a definitive, point-blank kiss: it was a fuzzy image of Diana and Dodi embracing on the Jonikal. A friend of Kelly faxed her the newspaper pictures in the middle of the night and Kelly was at once  stunned and convulsed with rage.

But although Kelly was shocked, General, she was not exactly surprised as two or three days prior, British tabloids had already begun rhapsodising on a brewing love affair between Dodi and Diana. That day, Kelly had picked up a phone to demand an immediate explanation from her fiancé. “I started calling him in London because at this time I was expecting his arrival in a day. I called his private line, but there was no answer. So then I called the secretary and asked to speak to him she wouldn’t put me on. So Mohamed got on and in so many horrible words told me to never call back again. I said, ‘He’s my fiancé, what are you talking about?’ He hung up on me and I called back and the secretary said don’t ever call here again, your calls are no longer to be put through. It was so horrible.”

Kelly did at long last manage to reach Dodi but he was quick to protest that, “I can’t talk to you on the phone. I will talk to you in LA.” Perhaps Dodi, General, just at that stage was unable to  muster sufficient  Dutch courage to thrash out the matter with Kelly but a more credible reason he would not talk had to do with his father’s obsessive bugging of every communication device Dodi used and every inch of every property he owned.  The following is what David Icke has to say on the subject in his iconic book The Biggest Secret:

“Ironically, Diana used to have Kensington Palace swept for listening devices and now she was in the clutches of a man for whom bugging was an obsession. The Al Fayed villa in San Tropez was bugged, as were all Fayed properties. Everything Diana said could be heard. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security at Harrods, said that the bugging there was ‘a very extensive operation’ and was also always under the direction of Al Fayed. Henry Porter, the London Editor of the magazine Vanity Fair, had spent two years investigating Al Fayed and he said they came across his almost obsessive use of eavesdropping devices to tape telephone calls, bug rooms, and film people.”

Through mutual friends, General, Porter warned Diana about Al Fayed’s background and activities ‘because we thought this was quite dangerous for her for obvious reasons’ but Diana apparently felt she could handle it and although she knew Al Fayed could ‘sometimes be a rogue’, he was no threat to her, she thought. “He is rather more than a rogue and rather more often than ‘sometimes,” she apparently told friends. “I know he’s naughty, but that’s all.” The TV programme  Dispatches said they had written evidence that Al Fayed bugged the Ritz Hotel and given his background and the deals that are hatched at the Ritz, it would be uncharacteristic if he did not. Kelly Fisher said that the whole time she was on Fayed property, she just assumed everything was bugged. It was known, she said, and Dodi had told her the bugging was so pervasive.




To his credit, General, Dodi was sufficiently concerned about what had transpired in St. Tropez to fly to LA and do his utmost to appease Kelly but Kelly simply was not interested as to her it was obvious enough that Diana was the new woman in his life.

On August 14, Kelly held a press conference in LA, where she announced that she was taking legal action against Dodi for breach of matrimonial contract. Her asking compensation price was £340,000. Of course the suit, General, lapsed automatically with the demise of Dodi in that Paris underpass on August 31, 1997.

Although Kelly did produce evidence of her engagement to Dodi in the form of a pricey and spectacular engagement ring, General, Mohamed Al Fayed was adamant that she never was engaged to his son and that she was no more than a gold digger.

But it is all water under the bridge now, General: Kelly is happily married to a pilot and the couple has a daughter. Her hubby  may not be half as rich as Dodi potentially was but she is fully fulfilled anyway. Happiness, General, comes in all shades and does not necessarily stem from a colossal bank balance or other such trappings of affluence.

Pic Cap

THE SHORT-LIVED TRIANGLE: For about a month or so, Dodi Al Fayed juggled Princess Diana and American model Kelly Fisher, who sported Dodi’s engagement ring.  Of course one of the two had to give and naturally it could not be Diana, who entered the lists in the eleventh hour but was the more precious by virtue of her royal pedigree and surpassing international stature.


Continue Reading


EXTRAVAGANCE One of The Scourges in Society.

9th February 2023

Extravagance in recent times has moved from being the practice of some rich and wealthy people of society in general and has regrettably, filtered to all levels of the society. Some of those who have the means are reckless and flaunt their wealth, and consequently, those of us who do not, borrow money to squander it in order to meet their families’ wants of luxuries and unnecessary items. Unfortunately this is a characteristic of human nature.

Adding to those feelings of inadequacy we have countless commercials to whet the consumer’s appetite/desire to buy whatever is advertised, and make him believe that if he does not have those products he will be unhappy, ineffective, worthless and out of tune with the fashion and trend of the times. This practice has reached a stage where many a bread winner resorts to taking loans (from cash loans or banks) with high rates of interest, putting himself in unnecessary debt to buy among other things, furniture, means of transport, dress, food and fancy accommodation, – just to win peoples’ admiration.

Islam and most religions discourage their followers towards wanton consumption. They encourage them to live a life of moderation and to dispense with luxury items so they will not be enslaved by them. Many people today blindly and irresponsibly abandon themselves to excesses and the squandering of wealth in order to ‘keep up with the Joneses’.

The Qur’aan makes it clear that allowing free rein to extravagance and exceeding the limits of moderation is an inherent characteristic in man. Allah says, “If Allah were to enlarge the provision for his servants, they would indeed transgress beyond all bounds.” [Holy Qur’aan 42:  27]


Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said, “Observe the middle course whereby you will attain your objective (that is paradise).” –  Moderation is the opposite of extravagance.

Every individual is meant to earn in a dignified manner and then spend in a very wise and careful manner. One should never try to impress upon others by living beyond one’s means. Extravagance is forbidden in Islam, Allah says, “Do not be extravagant; surely He does not love those who are extravagant!” [Holy Qur’aan 7: 31]

The Qur’aan regards wasteful buying of food, extravagant eating that sometimes leads to throwing away of leftovers as absolutely forbidden. Allah says, “Eat of the fruits in their season, but render the dues that are proper on the day that the harvest is gathered. And waste not by excess, for Allah loves not the wasters.” [Holy Qur’aan 6:  141]

Demonstrating wastefulness in dress, means of transport, furniture and any other thing is also forbidden. Allah says, “O children of Adam! Wear your apparel of adornment at every time and place of worship, and eat and drink but do not be extravagant; surely He does not love those who are extravagant!” [Holy Qur’aan 7:  31]

Yet extravagance and the squandering of wealth continue to grow in society, while there are many helpless and deprived peoples who have no food or shelter. Just look around you here in Botswana.

Have you noticed how people squander their wealth on ‘must have’ things like designer label clothes, fancy brand whiskey, fancy top of the range cars, fancy society parties or even costly weddings, just to make a statement? How can we prevent the squandering of such wealth?

How can one go on spending in a reckless manner possibly even on things that have been made forbidden while witnessing the suffering of fellow humans whereby thousands of people starve to death each year. Islam has not forbidden a person to acquire wealth, make it grow and make use of it. In fact Islam encourages one to do so. It is resorting to forbidden ways to acquiring and of squandering that wealth that Islam has clearly declared forbidden. On the Day of Judgment every individual will be asked about his wealth, where he obtained it and how he spent it.

In fact, those who do not have any conscience about their wasteful habits may one day be subjected to Allah’s punishment that may deprive them of such wealth overnight and impoverish them. Many a family has been brought to the brink of poverty after leading a life of affluence. Similarly, many nations have lived a life  of extravagance and their people indulged in such excesses only to be later inflicted by trials and tribulations to such a point that they wished they would only have a little of what they used to possess!

With the festive season and the new year holidays having passed us, for many of us meant ‘one’ thing – spend, spend, spend. With the festivities and the celebrations over only then will the reality set in for many of us that we have overspent, deep in debt with nothing to show for it and that the following months are going to be challenging ones.

Therefore, we should not exceed the bounds when Almighty bestows His bounties upon us. Rather we should show gratefulness to Him by using His bestowments and favours in ways that prove our total obedience to Him and by observing moderation in spending. For this will be better for us in this life and the hereafter.

Continue Reading