President Mokgweetsi Masisi has proved to be a no-nonsense man who does not nurse friendships and loyalties. If one was to make a bet, by the time he leaves office he would have made more enemies than friends. This however, does not seem to bother him.
Just a month after ascending to the presidency, he sent the nation’s most feared man — the head of intelligence — Colonel Isaac Kgosi packing. In the midst of that, and with no single sign of remorse, he purposely showed the middle figure to his predecessor, Lt Gen Ian Khama, then man who nominated him to a position—amid strong resistance from his inner circle — which would later catapult him to the presidency. For two years now, the two are not depicting any sign of burying the hatchet. If anything, the stand-off would most likely intensify.
In a blink of an eye, under Masisi’s presidency, former Permanent Secretary to the President (PSP), Carter Morupisi moved from being the most important civil servant to the most disgruntled. Morupisi, whom Masisi inherited as PSP, a position he was appointed to by Khama in 2014, was the one who was used as a wedge in the battle between his new boss and his former boss. By all accounts, Morupisi is indebted to Khama, a man who catapulted him from a peripheral but senior government post, to two of the highest posts in the civil service; first as Head of Directorate of Public Service Management (DPSM) and later as head of public service.
When the battle between Masisi and Khama broke out, Carter had no option, he could not serve both masters, he either had to serve Masisi or serve Khama. He chose the incumbent, probably because he knew where his bread was buttered. It turned out he was only presumptuous. Like everyone else, it ended in tears. Many fear Masisi’s onslaught of people associated with Khama’s administration would leave him jaded.
By the beginning of April, at least five senior civil servants would have left office. Many believe Masisi is disloyal and makes decisions based on emotions which might be a major concern for the country as a whole. But to others, he is a decisive man who would leave no stone unturned. The list of the disgruntled is not made of ordinary men. It has at its top, a former President, who also spent a larger part of his life as a military general; the list has the country’s first head of intelligence; it has former head of civil service, and joining them in the list is a cohort of other disgruntled former government head of departments.
According to Leonard Sesa, a political science academic at the University of Botswana (UB), Masisi has all the rights to marshal his government and deploy troops in the manner that suits him. “He cannot keep people from the past regime if they do not serve his interests, we cannot expect him to. That would be unfair,” said Sesa. “Most of those being dropped are those who are loyal to the past regime, we can’t behave like business as usual, that’s political sabotage. The President is permitted by the law to call on a new regime.”
He however pointed out that the many disgruntlements that have been reported on are a major challenge since this might compromise the country’s security. “This is on its own is a threat to national security and a threat to the President’s security. A threat to the President’s security would mean more money is spent in solidification of his protection.” Daniel Molaodi, who also lectures Public Administration at UB, highlighted that having a disgruntled past regime would solely depend on what caused it.
He interpreted that one would assume that the previous regime knows more than what the public does. “They might end up revealing some of the most sensitive things, but will solely depend on what is being revealed and what the public’s response would be.” Moreover, Molaodi says that being surrounded by such disgruntlements depends on how the President handles the situation. “One needs to be careful on how they preserve the skills and experiences of those who have held public offices for long, especially those in the security sector.”
Molaodi said that such sensitive sectors may pose as a threat jeopardizing the information they have in their hands. He also pointed out that one should keep in mind that holding such sensitive information holds the country at ransom depending on how those who have it choose to do with the information. “The danger of all this is, if the skills and experiences of these people fall in the wrong terrain, but like I said this wholly depends on how these people together with their skills and experiences are preserved,” emphasised Molaodi.
Amid these developments, the government has locked horns with Kgosi, who has been under DIS scrutiny since his dismissal from office in 2018. Kgosi has been charged with disclosing the identity of DIS agents to a local newspaper and obstructing them in their course of duty. He also faces a serious case of corruption and abuse of office in relation to a P250 million scandal. Meanwhile Morupisi, who saw off his last 6 months while serving suspension, is also facing corruption charges.
Morupisi was suspended from office in September 2019, after he was accused and charged with three charges of corruption – abuse of office, receiving bribery and money laundering, in relation to the alleged misappropriation of about P500 million from the Botswana Public Officers Pensioner Fund and Capital Management Botswana (CMB).
Here is how one Permanent Secretary encapsulates the clear tension between democracy and bureaucracy in Botswana: “President Mokgweetsi Masisi’s Government is behaving like a state surrounded with armed forces in order to capture it or force its surrender. The situation has turned so volatile, for tomorrow is not guaranteed for us top civil servants.
These are the painful results of a personalized civil service in our view as permanent secretaries”. Although his deduction of the situation may be summed as sour grapes because he is one of the ‘victims’ of the reshuffle, he is convinced this is a perfect description of the rationale behind frequent changes and transfers characterising the current civil service.
The result of it all, he said, is that “there is too much instability at managerial and strategic levels of the civil service leading to a noticeable directionless civil service.” He continued: “Changes and transfers are inevitable in the civil service, but to a permissible scale and frequency. Think of soccer team coach who changes and transfers his entire squad every month; you know the consequences?”
The Tsunami has hit hard at critical departments and Ministries leaving a strong wave of uncertainty, many demoralised and some jobless. In traditional approaches to public administration, democracy gives the goals; and bureaucracy delivers the technical efficiency required for implementation. But the recent moves in the civil service are indicative of conflicting imperatives – the notion of separation between politicians and administrators is becoming blurred by the day.
“Look at what happened to Prisons and BDF where second in command were overlooked for outsiders, and these are the people who had sacrificially served for donkey’s years hoping for a seat at the ladder’s end. The frequency of the changes, at times affecting the same Ministry or individual also demonstrates some level of ineptitude, clumsiness and lack of foresight from those in charge,” remarked the PS who added that their view is that the transfers are not related to anything but “settling scores, creating corruption opportunities and pushing out perceived dissident and former president, Ian Khama’s alleged loyalists and most of these transfers are said to be products of intelligence detection.”
Partly blaming Khama for the mess and his unwillingness to let go, the PS dismissed Masisi for falling to the trap and failing to outgrow the destructive tiff. “Khama is here to stay and the sooner Masisi comes to terms with the fact that he (Masisi) is the state President, the better. For a President to still be making these changes and transfers signals signs of a confused man who has not yet started rolling his roadmap, if at all it was ever there. I am saying this because any roadmap comes with key players and policies,” he concluded.
The Ministry of Health and Wellness seems to be the most hard-hit by the transfers, having experienced three Permanent Secretaries changes within a year and a half. Insiders say the changes have everything to do with the Ministry being the centre of COVID-19 tenders and economic opportunities. “The buck stops with the PS and no right-thinking PS can just allow glaring corruption under his watch as an accounting officer. Technocrats are generally law abiding, the pressure comes with politically appointed leaders racing against political terms to loot,” revealed a director in the Ministry preferring anonymity.
The latest transfer of Kabelo Ebineng she says was also motivated by his firm attitude against the President’s blue-eyed Task Team boys. “The Task Team wants to own the COVID-19 pandemic and government interventions and always cry foul when the Ministry reasserts itself as mandated by law,” said the director who added that Masisi who was always caught between the crossfire decided on sacrificing Ebineng to the joy of his team as they (Task Team) were in the habit of threatening to resign citing Ebineng as the problem.
Ebineng joins the Office of the President as a deputy Coordinator (government implementation and coordination office).The incoming PS is the soft-spoken Grace Muzila, known and described by her close associates as a conformist albeit knowledgeable.
One of the losers in the grand scheme is Thato Raphaka who many had seen as the next PSP because of his experience and calm demeanour following a declaration of interest in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Secretary post by the current PSP, Elias Magosi.
But hardly ten months into his post, Raphaka has been transferred out to the National Strategy Office in what many see as a demotion of some sort. Other notable changes coming into OP are Pearl Ramokoka formerly with the Employment, Labour and Productivity Ministry coming in as a Permanent Secretary and Kgomotso Abi as director of Public Service Reforms.
One of the ousted senior officers in the Office of the President warned that there are no signs that the changes and transfers will stop anytime soon: “If you are observant you would have long noticed that the changes don’t only affect senior officers but government decisions as well. A decision is made today and the government backtracks on it within a week. Not only that, the President says this today, and his deputy denies it the following day in Parliament,” he warned.
Some observers have blamed the turmoil in the civil service partly to lack of accountable presidential advisers or kitchen cabinet properly schooled on matters of statecraft. They point out that politicians or those peripheral to them should refrain from hampering the technical and organizational activities of public managers – or else the party (reshuffling) won’t stop.
In the view expressed by some Permanent Secretaries, Elias Magosi, has not really been himself since joining the civil service; and has cut a picture of indifference in most critical engagements; the most notable been a permanent secretaries platform which he chairs. As things stand there is need to reconcile the imperatives of democracy and democracy in Botswana. Peace will rein only when public value should stand astride the fault that runs between politicians and public managers.
Former Permanent Secretary to the President, Carter Morupisi, is fighting for survival in a matter in which the State has charged him and his wife, Pinnie Morupisi, with corruption and money laundering.
Morupisi has joined a list of prominent figures that served in the previous administration and who have been accused of corruption during their tenure in office. While others have been emerging victorious, Morupisi is yet to find that luck. The High Court recently dismissed his no case to answer application.
United States President, Joe Biden, is faced with a decision to make relating to the Covid-19 vaccine intellectual property after 175 former world leaders and Nobel laurates joined the campaign urging the US to take “urgent action” to suspend intellectual property rights for Covid-19 vaccines to help boost global inoculation rates.
According to the world leaders, doing so would allow developing countries to make their own copies of the vaccines that have been developed by pharmaceutical companies without fear of being sued for intellectual property infringements.
“A WTO waiver is a vital and necessary step to bringing an end to this pandemic. It must be combined with ensuring vaccine know-how and technology is shared openly,” the signatories, comprising more than 100 Nobel prize-winners and over 70 former world leaders, wrote in a letter to US President Joe Biden, according to Financial Times.
A measure to allow countries to temporarily override patent rights for Covid related medical products was proposed at the World Trade Organization by India and South Africa in October, and has since been backed by nearly 60 countries.
Former leaders who signed the letter included Gordon Brown, former UK Prime Minister; François Hollande, former French President; Mikhail Gorbachev, former President of the USSR; and Yves Leterme, former Belgian Prime Minister.
In their official communication, South Africa and India said: “As new diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines for Covid-19 are developed, there are significant concerns [about] how these will be made available promptly, in sufficient quantities and at affordable prices to meet global demand.”
While developed countries have been able to secure enough vaccine to inoculate their citizens, developing countries such as Botswana are struggling to source enough to swiftly vaccine their citizens, something which world leaders believe it would work against global recovery therefore proving counter-productive.
Since the availability of vaccines, Botswana has been able to secure only 60 000 doses of vaccines, 30 000 as donation as from the Indian government, while the other 30 000 was sourced through COVAX facility. Canada, has pre-ordered vaccines in surplus and it will be able to vaccinate each of its citizens six times over. In the UK and US, it is four vaccines per person; and two each in the EU and Australia.
For vaccines produced in Europe, developing countries are forced to pay double what European countries are paying, making it more expensive for already financially struggling economies. European countries however justify the price of vaccines and that they deserve to buy them cheap since they contributed in their development.
It is evident that vaccines cannot be made available immediately to all countries worldwide with wealthy economies being the only success story in that regard, something that has been referred to as a “catastrophic moral failure”, head of the World Health Organisation (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
The challenge facing developing countries is not only the price, but also the capacity of vaccine manufactures to be able to do so to meet global demand within a short time. The proposal for a patent waiver by India and South Africa has been rejected by developed countries, known for hosting the world leading pharmaceutical companies such US, European Union, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.
According to the Financial Times, US business groups including pharmaceutical industry representatives, have urged Biden to resist supporting a waiver to IP rules at the WTO, arguing that the proposal led by India and South Africa was too “vague” and “broad”.
The individuals who signed the letter, including Nobel laureates in economics as well as from across the arts and sciences, warned that inequitable vaccine access would impact the global economy and prevent it from recovering.
“The world saw unprecedented development of safe and effective vaccines, in major part thanks to US public investment,” the group wrote. “We all welcome that vaccination rollout in the US and many wealthier countries is bringing hope to their citizens.”
“Yet for the majority of the world that same hope is yet to be seen. New waves of suffering are now rising across the globe. Our global economy cannot rebuild if it remains vulnerable to this virus.” The group warned that fully enforcing IP was “self-defeating for the US” as it hindered global vaccination efforts. “Given artificial global supply shortages, the US economy already risks losing $1.3tn in gross domestic product this year.”