Connect with us

Dear Sir Seretse Khama; BNYC goes beyond 40 years

It is with great pleasure but concern that I pen this letter to you. I hereby seek advice and guidance on several national youth development matters, particularly the organization captured above. I write to you specifically because I have failed to find convincing viewpoints this side.

Sadly, it’s been 34 years since your untimely departure. In 1996 when asked about death world icon Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela (MHSRIP) answered “Death is something inevitable. When a man has done what he considers to be his duty to his people and his country, he can rest in peace”.

This statement helps me accept that you had done your part, you deserve the rest. My generation never got a chance to see you work or witness your charisma and vision, but vast literature teaches us a lot about you.

Myriad writers and historians have done a wonderful job by documenting and preserving your ideals and legacy. I assure you, your spirit lives on. Prof. Thomas Tlou (MHSRIP) et al. have done a splendid job by narrating and documenting your life in a renowned book titled “Seretse Khama: 1921-1980”.

Sometimes it feels like I was there during your time. Your inspirational quote that motivates’ us to selflessly serve this country reads "Lefatshe ke kereke yame. Go dira molemo tumelo yame”. By the way, we a fresh from the 11th general elections; for the first time ever the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) was up against a massive united opposition termed Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC).

Though perceived as ‘the new kid in the block’ its impact was heavily felt especially in urban and semi-urban areas. The opposition holds 20 seats in parliament and BDP register less than 50% popular vote.  It’s set to be an interesting parliament. 

Your successors Rra Gaone & Rra Nametso are well, but not very well. It is public knowledge they are utterly disappointed by the current regime, they feel a lot could and should be done differently. We are 2years away from reaching 50years of independence.

Major reflections are expected esp. that the 50th anniversary coincides with our 2016 Vision. Are you familiar with Vision 2016? If not let me know, I will gladly elaborate. I assume you are aware owing to remarkable economic growth Botswana has reached upper middle status? We escaped the resource curse that ruined many African countries.

However, despite the outstanding economic growth our people face disheartening socio-economic hardships such as: deep poverty, high un- and underemployment, disheartening inequalities, limited access to land and, low human development indicators generally.

These hardships are felt by youth more than other cohorts.  This is attributed to the fact that youth constitute a huge percentage of our population, scholars’ term it ‘youth-budge’. Economists classify ours as Economic Growth without Development.

They warn this is a basic recipe for socio-economic disaster. In a book titled ‘Why States Recover’ Greg Mills points out; Botswana has failed to make breakthrough to the next level of development by diversifying its economy. He concludes that Botswana can do better by focusing on lowering taxes and creating a better business environment. Anyway this letter is not meant to update you on the state of the nation or its democracy. I’m sure you get a lot of those from time to time.

This letter serves to share with you and where possible seek advice on the Botswana National Youth Council (BNYC), a youth organization established by your regime in 1974 via Presidential Directive CAB 9/74. Hence I feel you are best suited to provide guidance herein. When establishing BNYC you boldly and rightfully emphasized “here resets our past, present and future”. Most compatriots are grateful for the directive that established BNYC.

The good thing is most people think BNYC was your brain child, they don’t know it was an international requirement from several youth development declarations. However the status quo works well for your legacy, hence I never mention it.

BNYC is 40 years now. It has been through a few transformations but not much. It is now under a standalone Ministry of Youth, Sports & Culture (MYSC), Department of Youth (DoY) to be exact. Our 1996 National Youth Policy was revised in 2010, this positioned BNYC better in terms of strength and mandate. Besides shifting the youth age from 15-29yrs to 15-35yrs there is nothing revolutionary about the revised policy. One disturbing thing is BNYC continues to survive on government funding. I’m told it gets about P13.7 million per fiscal year.

This is a huge challenge; it makes it impossible for BNYC to impartially advance the interests and aspirations of youth. Moreover it still lacks legal liberation. Good news is; BNYC has 33 District Youth Committees (DYCs) spread across the country.

DYCs comprise of youth leaders directly elected by communities to represent their interests in the organization and districts. Sad news is; BNYC remains heavily centralized in Gaborone. DYCs are either under resourced, dysfunctional, or just tokenism.  Subsequently youth in rural and marginalized settlements are disadvantaged.

I recommend you read an article by Ephraim Koreng titled “What kind of animal is BNYC? Rural youth ask”. BNYC is flanked by disturbing issues of alleged malpractice in all shapes and sizes. In this regard kindly find among others the following articles: “BNYC: Tla' dijong [special report]” (Mmegi: 14/9/12), "BNYC accused of misusing Funds" (Gazette: 20/05/14) and “BNYC paralyzed by fight between board and CEO” (Sunday Standard: 24/09/12).

I must admit, I’m cognitively challenged in auditing expertise. But, I was taught ‘there is no smoke without fire’. My primary concern is the reputation of the organization, especially for current and potential donors. I need your guidance herein.

The other burning issue regarding BNYC is the issue of political interference; this is probably the most disturbing matter that should be addressed a.s.a.p. before it renders BNYC irrelevant. BNYC statutes dictate that ‘office bearers should not be actively involved in party politics’. 

Nonetheless the bottleneck is which calibrator should be used to quantify political activism or lack thereof? As long as this measure remains subjective, we are bound to find ourselves in gross confusion and uncertainty. Kindly advice! I also learn BNYC faces elementary but critical budgetary obstacles.

Apparently salaries take up approximately 80% of the annual grant; thus 20% or less for youth programing. Is this normal? Another burning issue is the infamous draft BNYC Bill; it’s currently shuttling between Parliament and the Attorney General Chambers.

The bill simply seeks to give government outright control of BNYC. I feel the Bill is regressive; however I await your guidance on this matter. In light of the deliberations above some compatriots persuasively argue BNYC is a serious waste of public resources.

They feel after 40years of failing its mandate and obtaining by falls pretense, BNYC must be dissolved and government should fund districts and constituencies directly. Others have dismissed it as nothing but a BDP grooming institute. Their concerns are earnestly valid; but I feel they are lazy cognitively, partisan and emotional in their submission. What’s your take?

There is a lot I wish to seek your guidance on. However I will stop this far and allow you space to advice. After your guidance I will publish an open communiqué titled “My experience with BNYC; why the Youth remain underdeveloped”. 

Greet all the great man and women up there; assure them their spirits live on. Guarantee Prof. Thomas Tlou majority of us strongly share his conviction, “this is our beloved Botswana, we need to develop it ourselves”.   

* Taziba is Youth Advocate & Researcher with keen interest in Youth Policy, Civic Engagement, Social Inclusion and Capacity Building
(7189 0354/


Continue Reading


Botswana to Become a Vaccinated Nation: Pandemic Anxiety Over?

30th March 2021


This is a question that should seriously exercise the mind of every Botswana citizen and every science researcher, every health worker and every political leader political.

The Covid-19 currently defines our lives and poses a direct threat to every aspect and every part of national safety, security and general well-being. This disease has become a normative part of human life throughout the world.

The first part of the struggle against the murderous depredation of this disease was to protect personal life through restrictive health injunctions and protocols; the worst possibly being human isolation and masks that hid our sorrows and lamentations through thin veils. We suffered that humiliation with grace and I believe as a nation we did a great job.

Now the vaccines are here, ushering us into the second phase of this war against the plague; and we are asking ourselves, is this science-driven fight against Covid-19 spell the end of pandemic anxiety? Is the health nightmare coming to an end? What happy lives lie ahead? Is this the time for celebration or caution? As the Non State Actors, we have being struggling with these questions for months.

We have published our thoughts and feelings, and our research reviews and thorough reading of both the local and international impacts of this rampaging viral invasion in local newspapers and social media platforms.

More significantly, we have successfully organised workshops about the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy and the last workshop invited a panel of health experts, professionals, and public administers to advance this social dialogue as part of our commitment to the tripartite engagement we enjoy working with Government of Botswana, Civil Society and Development partners. These workshops are virtual and open to all Batswana, foreign diplomatic missions based in Gaborone, UN agencies located in Gaborone and international academic researchers and professional health experts and specialists.

The mark of Covid-19 on our nation is a painful one, a tragedy shared by the entire human race, but still a contextually painful experience. Our response is fraught with grave difficulties; limited resources, limited time, and the urgency to not only save lives but also avert economic ruin and a bleak future for all who survive. Several vaccines are already in the  market.

Parts of the world are already doing the best they can to trunk the pestilential march of this disease by rolling out mass-vaccinations campaigns that promise to evict this health menace and nightmare from their public lives. Botswana, like much of Africa, is still up in the disreputable, and, unenviable, preventative social melee of masked interactions, metered distances, contactless commerce.

We remain very much at the mercy of a marauding virus that daily runs amuck with earth shattering implications for the economy and human lives. And the battle against both infections and transmissions is proving to be difficult, in terms of finance, institutional capacities and resource mobilization. How are we prepared as government, and as citizens, to embrace the impending mass-vaccinations? What are the chances of us  succeeding at this last-ditch effort to defeat the virus? What are the most pressing obstacles?

Does the work of vaccines spell an end to the pandemic anxieties?

Our panellists addressed the current state of mass-vaccination preparedness at the Botswana national level. What resources are available? What are the financial, institutional and administrative operational challenges (costs and supply chains, delivery, distribution, administering the vaccine on time, surveillance and security of vaccines?) What is being done to overcome them, or what can be done to overcome them? What do public assessments of preparedness tell us at the local community levels? How strong is the political will and direction? How long can we expect the whole exercise to last? At what point should we start seeing tangible results of the mass-vaccination campaign?

They also addressed the challenges of the anticipated emerging Vaccinated Society. How to fight the myths of vaccines and the superstitions about histories of human immunizations? What exactly is being done to grow robust local confidence in the science of vaccinations and the vaccines themselves? More significantly, how to square these campaigns vis-vis personal rights, moral/religious obligations?

What messages are being sent out in these regards and how are Batswana responding? What about issues of justice and equality? Will we get the necessary vaccines to everyone who wants them? What is being done to ensure no deserving person is left behind?

They also addressed issues of health data. To accomplish this mass-vaccination campaign and do everything right we need accurate and complete data. Poor data already makes it very hard to just cope with the disease. What is being done to improve data for the mass-vaccination campaign? How is this data being collected, aggregated and prepared for real life situation/applications throughout Botswana in the coming campaign?

We know in America, for example, general reporting and treatment of health data at the beginning of vaccinations was so poor, so chaotic and so scattered mainstream newspapers like The Atlantic, Washington Post and the New York Times had to step in, working very closely with civil society organizations, to rescue the situation. What data-related issues are still problematic in Botswana?

To be specific, what kind of Covid-19 data is being taken now to ready the whole country for an effective and efficient mass-vaccination program?

Batswana must be made aware that the  end part of vaccination will just mark the beginning of a long journey to health recovery and national redemption; that in many ways Covid-19 vaccination is just another step toward the many efforts in abeyance to fight this health pandemic, the road ahead is still long and painful.

For this purpose, and to highlight the significance of this observation we tasked our panellists with  the arduous imperative of  analysing the impact of mass-vaccination on society and the economy alongside the pressing issues of post-Covid-19 national health surveillance and rehabilitation programs.

Research suggests the aftermath of Covid-19 vaccination is going to be just as difficult and uncertain world as the present reality in many ways, and that caution should prevail over celebration, at least for a long time. The disease itself is projected to linger around for some time after all these mass-vaccination campaigns unless an effort is made to vaccinate everyone to the last reported case, every nation succeeds beyond herd immunity, and cure is found for Covid-19 disease. Many people are going to continue in need of medications, psychological and psychiatric services and therapy.

Is Botswana ready for this long holdout? If not, what path should we take going into the future? The Second concern is , are we going to have a single, trusted national agency charged with the  mandate to set standards for our national health data system, now that we know how real bad pandemics can be, and the value of data in quickly responding to them and mitigating impact? Finally, what is being done to curate a short history of this pandemic? A national museum of health and medicine or a Public Health Institute  in Botswana is overdue.

If we are to create strong sets of data policies and data quality standards for fighting future health pandemics it is critical that they find ideological and moral foundations in the artistic imagery and photography of the present human experience…context is essential to fighting such diseases, and to be prepared we must learn from every tragic health incident.

Our panellists answered most of these questions with distinguished intellectual clarity. We wish Batswana to join us in our second Mass-vaccination workshop.

*Oscar Motsumi:

Continue Reading


The women you see in the news matter. Here’s why

9th March 2021
Jane Godia

Jane Godia

Today is International Women’s Day – it’s a moment to think about how much better our news diet could be if inequities were eliminated. In 1995, when the curtains fell in one of the largest meetings that have ever brought women together to discuss women in development, it was noted that women and media remain key to development.

Twenty-six years later, the relevant “Article J” of the Beijing Platform for Action, remains unfulfilled. Its two strategic objectives with regard to Women and Media have not been met. They are
Increase the participation and access of women to expression and decision-making in and through the media and new technologies of communication

Promote a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media.

Today, as we mark International Women’s Day, it’s an indictment on both media owners and civil society that women remain on the periphery of news-making. They cannot claim equal space in either the structures of newsrooms or in the content produced, be that as sources of news or as the subjects of reports. Indeed, the latest figures from WAN-IFRA’s Women in News Programme show just one in five voices in news belong to women*, be they as sources, as the author or as the main character of the news report.

Some progress was evident several years back, with stand-out women being named as chief executive officers, editors in chief, managing editors and executive editors. But these gains appear short lived in most media organisations. Excitement has turned to frustration as one-step forward has been replaced with three steps backwards. In Africa, the problem is acute. The decision-making tables of media organisations remain deprived of women and where there are women, they are surrounded by men.

Few women have followed in the footsteps of Esther Kamweru, the first woman managing editor in Kenya, and indeed sub-Saharan Africa. Today’s standout women editors include Pamela Makotsi-Sittoni (Nation Media Group, Kenya), Barbara Kaija (New Vision, Uganda), Mary Mbewe (Daily Nation, Zambia), Margaret Vuchiri (The Monitor, Uganda), Joyce Shebe (Clouds, Tanzania), Tryphinah Dongwana (Weekend Post, Botswana), Joyce Mhaville (Independent Television -ITV, Tanzania) and Tuma Abdallah (Standard Newspapers,Tanzania). But they remain an exception.

The lack of balance between women and men at the table of decision making has a rollback effect on the content that is produced. A table dominated by men typically makes decisions that benefit men.

So today, International Women’s Day is a grim reminder that things are not rosy in the news business. Achieving gender balance in news and in the structure of media organisations remains a challenge. Unmet, it sees more than half of the population in our countries suffer the consequences of bias, discrimination and sexism.

The business of ignoring the other half of the population can no longer be treated as normal. It’s time that media leaders grasp the challenge, not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it also makes a whole lot of business sense: start covering women, give them space and a voice in news-making and propel them to all levels of decision making within your organisation.

We can no longer afford to imagine that it’s only men who make and sell the news and bring in the shillings to fund the media business. Women too are worthy newsmakers. In all of our societies, there are women holding decision making positions and who are now experts in once male-only domains such as engineers, doctors, scientists and researchers.

They can be deliberately picked out to share their perspectives and expertise and bring balance to the profile of experts quoted on our news pages. Media is the prism through which society sees itself and women are an untapped audience. So, as we celebrate International Women’s Day, let us embrace diversity, which yields better news content and business products, and in so doing eliminate sexism. We know that actions and attitudes that discriminate against people based on their gender is bad for business.

As media, the challenge is ours. We need to consciously embrace and reach the commitments made 26 years ago when the Beijing Platform for Action was signed globally. As the news consuming public, you have a role to play too. Hold your news organization to account and make sure they deliver balanced news that reflects the voices of all of society.

Jane Godia is a gender development and media expert who serves as the Africa Director of Women in News programme.  
WOMEN IN NEWS is WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media.

Jane Godia, Director, Africa, Women in News

Continue Reading


Why is the media so afraid to talk about sexual harassment?

9th March 2021


The eve of International Women’s Day presents an opportunity for us to think about gender equality and the long and often frustrating march toward societies that are truly equal.

As media, we are uniquely placed to drive forward this reflection and discussion. But while focusing on the challenges of gender in society, we owe it to our staff and the communities we serve to also take a hard look at the obstacles within our own organisations.

I’m talking specifically about the scourge of sexual harassment. It’s likely to have happened in your newsroom. It has likely happened to a member of your team. It happens to all genders but is disproportionately directed at women. It happens in every industry, regardless of country, culture or context. This is because sexual harassment is driven by power, not sex. Wherever you have imbalances in power, you have individuals who are at risk of sexual harassment, and those who abuse this power.

I’ve been sexually harassed. The many journalists and editors, friends and family members who I have spoken to over the years on this subject have also been harassed. Yet it is still hard for leaders to recognize that this could be happening within their newsrooms and boardrooms. Why does it continue to be such a taboo?

Counting the cost of sexual harassment

Sexual harassment is, simply put, bad for business. It can harm your corporate reputation. It is a drain on the productivity of staff and managers. Maintaining and building trust in your brand is an absolute imperative for media organisations globally. If and when a case gets out of control or is badly handled – this can directly impact your bottom line.

It is for this reason that WAN-IFRA Women in News has put eliminating sexual harassment as a top priority in our work around gender equality in the media sector. This might seem at odds with the current climate where social interactions are fewer and remote work scenarios are in place in many newsrooms and businesses. But one only needs to tune into the news to know that the abuse of power, manifested as verbal, physical or online harassment, is alive and well.

Preliminary results from an ongoing Women in News research study into the issue of sexual harassment polling hundreds of journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia indicate that more than 1 in 3 women media professionals have been physically harassed, and just under 50% have been verbally harassed. Just over 15% of men in African newsrooms reported being physically harassed, and slightly less than 1 in 4 reports being verbally harassed. The numbers for male media professionals in Southeast Asia are slightly higher than a quarter on both forms of harassment.

The first step in confronting sexual harassment is to talk about it. We need to strip away the stigma and discomfort around having open conversations about what sexual harassment is and isn’t. Media managers, it is entirely in your power to create dynamics in your own teams that are free from sexual harassment.

Publishers and CEOs, you set the organisational culture in your media company.

By being vocal in recognising that it happens everywhere, and communicating to your employees that you will not tolerate sexual harassment of any kind, you send a powerful message to your teams, and publicly. With these actions, you will help us overcome the legacy of silence around this topic, and in doing so take an important first step to create media environments that truly embrace equality.

Melanie Walker is Executive Director of Media Development of the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). She is a creator of Women in News, WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media.

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!