Connect with us

Tertiary Education Funding: a ticking time bomb

In our country, government and civil society organizations have unconsciously/consciously restricted youth development activism and advocacy to superficial symptoms aligned to the revised National Youth Policy thematic areas. Though commendable, this tendency has resulted in a dangerous reactionary dependency culture among most youth activists, advocates and organizations.

Subsequently, youth development issues are deliberated and resolved in isolation from fundamental underlining factors. For instance; these are habitually discussed and resolved in isolation from prevailing economic pressures due to gradually declining government revenues in the medium to long term. As a result most of these interventions and demands are reactionary and naïve, therefore not realistic and sustainable. In a recent quarterly review Econsult economists led by Keith Jefferies caution against such tendencies.

The economists advise that a coherent plan for dealing with socio-economic development challenges is necessary. This approach has erroneously resulted in an assumption that youth un- and underemployment, access to land and deteriorating education standards are our only ‘ticking time bombs’. This installment adds another crucial yet over looked ‘ticking time bomb’.

The pondering herein is mostly (but not exclusively) centered on a conference paper I authored and co-present a while ago.  About a year ago I accepted an invitation to engineer a pro-students and youth position paper for the ‘2nd Annual Tertiary education Council (TEC) Conference’ held under the theme ‘Tertiary Education Financing in a resource limited environment’. 

Before the paper was constructed I was certain its title will be “Youth & Students Victims of Circumstances”. I was not part of the internal process but, I’m told initially the title and tone of the paper was viewed with the usual suspicion and resistance associated with perspectives of youth and student activists. Nonetheless it was eventually accepted for presentation. Thereafter, I was extended an opportunity to co-present it.

The conference was well organized, publicized and attended. It attracted heavy weights in the fields of education, economics and governance across the globe. Local heavy weights that presented at the conference include academic guru and currently suspended University of Botswana (UB) Faculty of Social Science Dean Prof. Happy Siphambe, Botswana College of Agriculture (BCA) Faculty of Agriculture Dean Prof Khonga, UB academic and socio-economist Dr. Botlhale (now Prof.) and, UB Vice Chancellor Prof. Thabo Fako set the conference tone and direction through the opening remarks. Internationally it attracted reputable scholars, economists and administrators from; the World Bank, Ethiopia, Lesotho, Kenya, Ghana, Uganda and China.

Before and during the conference it was crystal clear the intention was to legitimize a principle known as ‘cost sharing’ as the best solution for tertiary education funding in a resource limited environment. As we had anticipated all the speakers including Professor Emeritus Jim Cobbe (Ministry of Education and Skills Development Advisor) supported ‘cost sharing’ as the best alternative. We understood the rational but, we stood by our position, despite the fact that our paper was one of the last (if not the last) to be tabled and debated.  

In principle we agreed with the house. Hence we started by acknowledging that: “Over the years Botswana Government has delivered 100% sponsorship to all citizens that completed senior secondary school and could find admission to local public tertiary institutions alongside funding the operations and development requirements of the public tertiary education institutions”.

We further acknowledged the situation accelerated in 2007 when government started sponsoring students to private tertiary institutions. It is estimated that as a result of this decision in 2011/12 over 95% of the 46,700 plus learners in public and private tertiary education in Botswana were government sponsored. We also acknowledged that “…this is model spectacular”.

But, hastened to caution that “…in light of declining government revenues  in addition to Tertiary Education Council (TEC) projections of tertiary education enrolment increasing from 46,711 in 2012 to 58,935 in 2016.  The sustainability of this model is questionable”. We felt the current tertiary education model is not sustainable based on the increasing number of learners seeking space in tertiary institution, declining government revenue plus emerging conflicting demands requiring government’s attention.

Our point of departure was the prescription for the diagnoses.  In the most strategic and respectful way we empirically rejected “cost sharing” as the best prescription. Instaed, we called for a ‘systems thinking’ approach on the matter. Our convictions were based on: ‘Culture of Batswana, Economic status of citizens, Return on investment in tertiary education’. Under culture, we argued that government’s top-down approach has created a serious dependency culture among Batswana.

This culture has resulted in miserable failure of among others the Back-To-School initiative.  We proposed the issue of culture of Batswana be taken into consideration to reduce the chances of further complications in our tertiary education objectives. On economic status, we acknowledged Botswana’s remarkable economic growth.

We also acknowledged its economic development setbacks such as; high income equalities (Gini coefficient 0.6), high unemployment rates (17.6%), high incidence of absolute poverty and high HIV/Aids prevalence rates. These challenges indicate that many households live in poverty, a high number of families do not have bread-winners due to the HIV/AIDS pandemic, a good portion of households and capable citizens are unemployed, hence no income.

Despite high GDP per capita majority of Batswana currently do not benefit from the wealth of the country, thus majority of them genuinely lack resources to cost sharing. On return on investment, we argued it is an open secret, there is a mismatch between our tertiary curriculum and labor market demands (as documented in the formulation study of HRDC).

This has resulted in a large number tertiary graduates being unemployed while some are underemployed. As a result an average parent/guardian may find themselves with more than one tertiary graduate staying home. This reality obviously discourages parents from parting with their hard-eearned resources to invest on a service (tertiary education) that they are not convinced will yield any positive results.

Our short term propositions were: ‘aggressive cost recovery, partnership with private sector and, adoption of financially friendly methods’. Aggressive cost recovery; we proposed that as a matter of urgency an aggressive cost recovery strategy be launched. Its public knowledge that the Ministry of Education and Skills Development (MOE & SD) is owed millions of pula’s in unpaid student loans.

The revenue recovered from this exercise should be used to supplement the limited revenue. We reminded the house that, had there been effective cost recovery this situation would be much better. Partnering with private sector; it goes without reasonable doubt that the private sector thrives on human resource trained by government. It relies on graduates that have been fully trained at government expense.

Hence, it’s only fair that they (private sector) be brought on board to assist in financing tertiary education (directly and indirectly). Adoption of financially friendly systems by tertiary institutions: we encouraged massive assessment and reforms for financially friendly modes of educational delivery among tertiary institutions.

As we face challenges of a resource limited environment, it is important for tertiary institutions to adopt cost effective modes of service delivery. We gave example of the UB situation, were students are calling for supplementary exams, to reduce costs and the duration it takes for students to complete their studies. We condemned the government for turning a blind to the concerns of the earnest concerns of the student community.  

Like access to land, poverty, unemployment and, underemployment the issue of tertiary education funding is fragile; it should be handled with the sensitivity it deserves. Otherwise, it is bound to brew undesirable and unnecessary political, social and economic unrest.

* Taziba is Youth Advocate & Researcher with keen interest in Youth Policy, Civic Engagement, Social Inclusion and Capacity Building
(7189 0354/

Continue Reading


Botswana to Become a Vaccinated Nation: Pandemic Anxiety Over?

30th March 2021


This is a question that should seriously exercise the mind of every Botswana citizen and every science researcher, every health worker and every political leader political.

The Covid-19 currently defines our lives and poses a direct threat to every aspect and every part of national safety, security and general well-being. This disease has become a normative part of human life throughout the world.

The first part of the struggle against the murderous depredation of this disease was to protect personal life through restrictive health injunctions and protocols; the worst possibly being human isolation and masks that hid our sorrows and lamentations through thin veils. We suffered that humiliation with grace and I believe as a nation we did a great job.

Now the vaccines are here, ushering us into the second phase of this war against the plague; and we are asking ourselves, is this science-driven fight against Covid-19 spell the end of pandemic anxiety? Is the health nightmare coming to an end? What happy lives lie ahead? Is this the time for celebration or caution? As the Non State Actors, we have being struggling with these questions for months.

We have published our thoughts and feelings, and our research reviews and thorough reading of both the local and international impacts of this rampaging viral invasion in local newspapers and social media platforms.

More significantly, we have successfully organised workshops about the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy and the last workshop invited a panel of health experts, professionals, and public administers to advance this social dialogue as part of our commitment to the tripartite engagement we enjoy working with Government of Botswana, Civil Society and Development partners. These workshops are virtual and open to all Batswana, foreign diplomatic missions based in Gaborone, UN agencies located in Gaborone and international academic researchers and professional health experts and specialists.

The mark of Covid-19 on our nation is a painful one, a tragedy shared by the entire human race, but still a contextually painful experience. Our response is fraught with grave difficulties; limited resources, limited time, and the urgency to not only save lives but also avert economic ruin and a bleak future for all who survive. Several vaccines are already in the  market.

Parts of the world are already doing the best they can to trunk the pestilential march of this disease by rolling out mass-vaccinations campaigns that promise to evict this health menace and nightmare from their public lives. Botswana, like much of Africa, is still up in the disreputable, and, unenviable, preventative social melee of masked interactions, metered distances, contactless commerce.

We remain very much at the mercy of a marauding virus that daily runs amuck with earth shattering implications for the economy and human lives. And the battle against both infections and transmissions is proving to be difficult, in terms of finance, institutional capacities and resource mobilization. How are we prepared as government, and as citizens, to embrace the impending mass-vaccinations? What are the chances of us  succeeding at this last-ditch effort to defeat the virus? What are the most pressing obstacles?

Does the work of vaccines spell an end to the pandemic anxieties?

Our panellists addressed the current state of mass-vaccination preparedness at the Botswana national level. What resources are available? What are the financial, institutional and administrative operational challenges (costs and supply chains, delivery, distribution, administering the vaccine on time, surveillance and security of vaccines?) What is being done to overcome them, or what can be done to overcome them? What do public assessments of preparedness tell us at the local community levels? How strong is the political will and direction? How long can we expect the whole exercise to last? At what point should we start seeing tangible results of the mass-vaccination campaign?

They also addressed the challenges of the anticipated emerging Vaccinated Society. How to fight the myths of vaccines and the superstitions about histories of human immunizations? What exactly is being done to grow robust local confidence in the science of vaccinations and the vaccines themselves? More significantly, how to square these campaigns vis-vis personal rights, moral/religious obligations?

What messages are being sent out in these regards and how are Batswana responding? What about issues of justice and equality? Will we get the necessary vaccines to everyone who wants them? What is being done to ensure no deserving person is left behind?

They also addressed issues of health data. To accomplish this mass-vaccination campaign and do everything right we need accurate and complete data. Poor data already makes it very hard to just cope with the disease. What is being done to improve data for the mass-vaccination campaign? How is this data being collected, aggregated and prepared for real life situation/applications throughout Botswana in the coming campaign?

We know in America, for example, general reporting and treatment of health data at the beginning of vaccinations was so poor, so chaotic and so scattered mainstream newspapers like The Atlantic, Washington Post and the New York Times had to step in, working very closely with civil society organizations, to rescue the situation. What data-related issues are still problematic in Botswana?

To be specific, what kind of Covid-19 data is being taken now to ready the whole country for an effective and efficient mass-vaccination program?

Batswana must be made aware that the  end part of vaccination will just mark the beginning of a long journey to health recovery and national redemption; that in many ways Covid-19 vaccination is just another step toward the many efforts in abeyance to fight this health pandemic, the road ahead is still long and painful.

For this purpose, and to highlight the significance of this observation we tasked our panellists with  the arduous imperative of  analysing the impact of mass-vaccination on society and the economy alongside the pressing issues of post-Covid-19 national health surveillance and rehabilitation programs.

Research suggests the aftermath of Covid-19 vaccination is going to be just as difficult and uncertain world as the present reality in many ways, and that caution should prevail over celebration, at least for a long time. The disease itself is projected to linger around for some time after all these mass-vaccination campaigns unless an effort is made to vaccinate everyone to the last reported case, every nation succeeds beyond herd immunity, and cure is found for Covid-19 disease. Many people are going to continue in need of medications, psychological and psychiatric services and therapy.

Is Botswana ready for this long holdout? If not, what path should we take going into the future? The Second concern is , are we going to have a single, trusted national agency charged with the  mandate to set standards for our national health data system, now that we know how real bad pandemics can be, and the value of data in quickly responding to them and mitigating impact? Finally, what is being done to curate a short history of this pandemic? A national museum of health and medicine or a Public Health Institute  in Botswana is overdue.

If we are to create strong sets of data policies and data quality standards for fighting future health pandemics it is critical that they find ideological and moral foundations in the artistic imagery and photography of the present human experience…context is essential to fighting such diseases, and to be prepared we must learn from every tragic health incident.

Our panellists answered most of these questions with distinguished intellectual clarity. We wish Batswana to join us in our second Mass-vaccination workshop.

*Oscar Motsumi:

Continue Reading


The women you see in the news matter. Here’s why

9th March 2021
Jane Godia

Jane Godia

Today is International Women’s Day – it’s a moment to think about how much better our news diet could be if inequities were eliminated. In 1995, when the curtains fell in one of the largest meetings that have ever brought women together to discuss women in development, it was noted that women and media remain key to development.

Twenty-six years later, the relevant “Article J” of the Beijing Platform for Action, remains unfulfilled. Its two strategic objectives with regard to Women and Media have not been met. They are
Increase the participation and access of women to expression and decision-making in and through the media and new technologies of communication

Promote a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media.

Today, as we mark International Women’s Day, it’s an indictment on both media owners and civil society that women remain on the periphery of news-making. They cannot claim equal space in either the structures of newsrooms or in the content produced, be that as sources of news or as the subjects of reports. Indeed, the latest figures from WAN-IFRA’s Women in News Programme show just one in five voices in news belong to women*, be they as sources, as the author or as the main character of the news report.

Some progress was evident several years back, with stand-out women being named as chief executive officers, editors in chief, managing editors and executive editors. But these gains appear short lived in most media organisations. Excitement has turned to frustration as one-step forward has been replaced with three steps backwards. In Africa, the problem is acute. The decision-making tables of media organisations remain deprived of women and where there are women, they are surrounded by men.

Few women have followed in the footsteps of Esther Kamweru, the first woman managing editor in Kenya, and indeed sub-Saharan Africa. Today’s standout women editors include Pamela Makotsi-Sittoni (Nation Media Group, Kenya), Barbara Kaija (New Vision, Uganda), Mary Mbewe (Daily Nation, Zambia), Margaret Vuchiri (The Monitor, Uganda), Joyce Shebe (Clouds, Tanzania), Tryphinah Dongwana (Weekend Post, Botswana), Joyce Mhaville (Independent Television -ITV, Tanzania) and Tuma Abdallah (Standard Newspapers,Tanzania). But they remain an exception.

The lack of balance between women and men at the table of decision making has a rollback effect on the content that is produced. A table dominated by men typically makes decisions that benefit men.

So today, International Women’s Day is a grim reminder that things are not rosy in the news business. Achieving gender balance in news and in the structure of media organisations remains a challenge. Unmet, it sees more than half of the population in our countries suffer the consequences of bias, discrimination and sexism.

The business of ignoring the other half of the population can no longer be treated as normal. It’s time that media leaders grasp the challenge, not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it also makes a whole lot of business sense: start covering women, give them space and a voice in news-making and propel them to all levels of decision making within your organisation.

We can no longer afford to imagine that it’s only men who make and sell the news and bring in the shillings to fund the media business. Women too are worthy newsmakers. In all of our societies, there are women holding decision making positions and who are now experts in once male-only domains such as engineers, doctors, scientists and researchers.

They can be deliberately picked out to share their perspectives and expertise and bring balance to the profile of experts quoted on our news pages. Media is the prism through which society sees itself and women are an untapped audience. So, as we celebrate International Women’s Day, let us embrace diversity, which yields better news content and business products, and in so doing eliminate sexism. We know that actions and attitudes that discriminate against people based on their gender is bad for business.

As media, the challenge is ours. We need to consciously embrace and reach the commitments made 26 years ago when the Beijing Platform for Action was signed globally. As the news consuming public, you have a role to play too. Hold your news organization to account and make sure they deliver balanced news that reflects the voices of all of society.

Jane Godia is a gender development and media expert who serves as the Africa Director of Women in News programme.  
WOMEN IN NEWS is WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media.

Jane Godia, Director, Africa, Women in News

Continue Reading


Why is the media so afraid to talk about sexual harassment?

9th March 2021


The eve of International Women’s Day presents an opportunity for us to think about gender equality and the long and often frustrating march toward societies that are truly equal.

As media, we are uniquely placed to drive forward this reflection and discussion. But while focusing on the challenges of gender in society, we owe it to our staff and the communities we serve to also take a hard look at the obstacles within our own organisations.

I’m talking specifically about the scourge of sexual harassment. It’s likely to have happened in your newsroom. It has likely happened to a member of your team. It happens to all genders but is disproportionately directed at women. It happens in every industry, regardless of country, culture or context. This is because sexual harassment is driven by power, not sex. Wherever you have imbalances in power, you have individuals who are at risk of sexual harassment, and those who abuse this power.

I’ve been sexually harassed. The many journalists and editors, friends and family members who I have spoken to over the years on this subject have also been harassed. Yet it is still hard for leaders to recognize that this could be happening within their newsrooms and boardrooms. Why does it continue to be such a taboo?

Counting the cost of sexual harassment

Sexual harassment is, simply put, bad for business. It can harm your corporate reputation. It is a drain on the productivity of staff and managers. Maintaining and building trust in your brand is an absolute imperative for media organisations globally. If and when a case gets out of control or is badly handled – this can directly impact your bottom line.

It is for this reason that WAN-IFRA Women in News has put eliminating sexual harassment as a top priority in our work around gender equality in the media sector. This might seem at odds with the current climate where social interactions are fewer and remote work scenarios are in place in many newsrooms and businesses. But one only needs to tune into the news to know that the abuse of power, manifested as verbal, physical or online harassment, is alive and well.

Preliminary results from an ongoing Women in News research study into the issue of sexual harassment polling hundreds of journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia indicate that more than 1 in 3 women media professionals have been physically harassed, and just under 50% have been verbally harassed. Just over 15% of men in African newsrooms reported being physically harassed, and slightly less than 1 in 4 reports being verbally harassed. The numbers for male media professionals in Southeast Asia are slightly higher than a quarter on both forms of harassment.

The first step in confronting sexual harassment is to talk about it. We need to strip away the stigma and discomfort around having open conversations about what sexual harassment is and isn’t. Media managers, it is entirely in your power to create dynamics in your own teams that are free from sexual harassment.

Publishers and CEOs, you set the organisational culture in your media company.

By being vocal in recognising that it happens everywhere, and communicating to your employees that you will not tolerate sexual harassment of any kind, you send a powerful message to your teams, and publicly. With these actions, you will help us overcome the legacy of silence around this topic, and in doing so take an important first step to create media environments that truly embrace equality.

Melanie Walker is Executive Director of Media Development of the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). She is a creator of Women in News, WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media.

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!