Human rights organisations, the Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA) and Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals of Botswana (LEGABIBO) have not taken kindly to the position and remarks uttered by Evangelist Fellowship of Botswana (EFB) and their attitude towards minority group of gays and lesbians.
Recently the church umbrella body, EFB, has been lobbying the government of Botswana to appeal a High Court ruling that ordered the gay organisation to legally register. However the government did not appeal the matter during the stipulated time given by the courts to do so.
LEGABIBO went to court following the registration rejection by the department of Civil and National Registration under the auspices of Ministry of Labour and Home Affairs under the pretext that homosexuality is unlawful in Botswana. Consequently, LEGABIBO went to court for intervention – and court ruled in favour of the gay movement.
The church movement has since poured scorn at the court judgement arguing that ordering the registration of LEGABIBO whose objects are to advocate for recognition and protection of homosexuality is a hammer to the society’s moral conscience, adding that “the judgment is likely to cause a spin in an acceleration of moral deterioration and moral bankruptcy which will add to the already burden of lawlessness and social ills in our society.”
In response BONELA and LEAGABIBO this week fumed at the church movement during an interview with the WeekendPost. They stated that, “EFB should not and must not be allowed to dictate or influence who can or cannot be registered with the registrar of societies.” The two human rights organisations argue that LEGABIBO were applicants just like any other body that wanted to register.
“The moment EFB is allowed to do so; we can all kiss our freedoms goodbye because we will wake up to the entire nation being run by a certain church denomination.” They continued: “should this happen, we are at the risk of having institutions that are different to them being outlawed; it could be a church that does not fall under their church body or an organisations that deals with women rights, any religion outside its belief being banned in Botswana and certain constitutional provisions stricken out.”
LEGABIBO Coordinator, Caine Youngman urged all Batswana to respect each other and to respect rights provided for by the Constitution. He referred the EFB ‘for their convenience,’ to the constitutional provisions of Section 13 which provides for the protection of freedom of assembly and association, Section 12 which provides for the protection of freedom of expression and also Section 15 which provides for protection from discrimination.
According to LEGABIBO Coordinator, Botswana is a constitutionally run sovereign state and its sovereignty trickles down to individual autonomy of every Motswana hence all are recognised as individuals. “Every Motswana is protected and respected before the law,” he told this publication, adding that respect before the law means one has the platform to point out where he/she thinks he has been hurt or prejudiced.
“The lesbians, gays and bisexuals of Botswana did just that. The registrar of societies denied this community their constitutional right to associate and they pointed it out. The High Court of Botswana following the law, agreed with these Batswana. The ruling was that this community has the right to associate as provided by the Constitution of Botswana. The Constitution of Botswana has made provisions that are to be respected and adhered to for peace, tolerance and justice.”
Youngman attacked the EFB saying they are toying around with such provisions and highlighted that EFB is a body that followed the same processes LEGABIBO engaged with to get registered. “They used the same legal provisions to register as a way to exercise their freedom of association.”
The gay organisation lamented that it is hypocrisy for EFB to then turn around and call for LEGABIBO not to be registered considering they benefitted from the same provision.
BONELA and LEGABIBO reminded EFB that there are people who do not believe in the existence of EFB, its mandate and its practices but they all respect their existence because they have a right to associate despite being different from them.
Some of people are from traditional churches, some spiritual, and some are non-Christian believers but they tolerate EFB’s existence not because they agree with them, but merely because it is EFB’s right to associate with like minded people.
According to the two human rights organisations, the difference between the Constitution and EFB is that the constitution caters for everybody – be it a Muslims, Catholics, Zion followers, non religious person, gay, heterosexual, worker, student, children, senior citizens etc. As long as one is a human being in Botswana, they contend the Constitution applies to them. However, they highlighted that same cannot be said about EFB as it only caters for those who associate themselves with EFB.
EFB is an Umbrella body of Evangelical, Pentecostal and Para Church organizations in the country that has a membership denomination currently standing at seventy nine.
BONELA and LEGABIBO believe that if we start singling out who can be protected by our laws and who cannot, who has the right to be heard and who doesn’t, who has the rights to express themselves and who doesn’t, then we are making ourselves vulnerable to all sorts of abuses by overzealous bodies.
“Since it is not your liberties at stake it might seem okay. Today they are calling for LEGABIBO not to be registered. Tomorrow it will be you and those you peacefully associate with. The question to all of us is ‘who is next on their hit list?’ Will it be radio stations because they are said to be playing ‘ungodly music?” or who, they asked.
Meanwhile LEGABIBO Coordinator confirmed that his organisation has submitted all the documentation necessary to process their registration and now awaiting respond from the department (Civil and National registration).
LEGABIBO is a human rights organisation whose mandate is to represent the interests and protect the rights of the Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Transgender and Intersex community in Botswana while BONELA is a non-governmental organisation committed to integrating an ethical, legal and human rights approach into Botswana’s response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the Review of the Constitution held a meeting in Serowe this week. The meeting was to accord Bangwato, just like other tribes, a platform to give their opinions, contributions and what they think is the horse power and limitations of the current Constitution of Botswana.
Bangwato Regent, Kgosi Serogola Seretse said, he is of the understanding that the Commission has not come for anything apart from getting their opinions on how things could be made better. His contribution was that he solely knows of only two social positions in the world; Dikgosi and Pastors. He said other positions are just benedictions. He further urged that, Batswana should respect God’s ordained protocols such as Dikgosi and Pastors.
Seretse pointed out the importance of acknowledging and appreciating Dikgosi as nation builders. He cautioned and warned that, the Commission should ensure that their dealing with Dikgosi is harmonious. He called for an amendment to be made on the ‘National Order of Precedence’ noting that Dikgosi are put at number 11, but should at least be taken a little higher to number 7.
One resident, Tshepo Moloi while giving his contribution said there must be provisions of Social Justice that ensure equal distribution of resources to all citizens. He said this provision should entail an obligation that all citizen have equal opportunities to different Government Initiatives. Moloi substantiated that, all ‘Presidential Commissions’ be engraved on the Constitution
Alfred Thogolwane who is as well a resident of the biggest village in the Central District, pointed out the need for preservation of the country and resources thereof, saying “it must dawn onto all that, the calabash that fetches water for the family cannot fixed once its broken.” Another resident, Keikantsemang Sebedi advocated for Polygamous marriage, saying that men should marry as many wives as they please. She said there is no need for any socioeconomic assessment done on men who wish to marry more than one wife.
She advised that, the country should benchmark from the Zezuru culture that does it, with no complexities. On the other hand, Sebedi said that, there must be considerations done on the Old Age Pension. She said people who earned P4000 should not receive the old Age Pension upon their fullness of age. Forshia Koloi called for amendments on Section 77 and all the provisions that speaks to the subject of Bogosi and the powers infested in them. He said they should be made more detailed and avoid ambiguity in clauses.
Mr Tlhaodi said there must be Land Audits done in the country. Citing an example of the Tati Land as one that should be thoroughly audited. He further advised that, Election Day be put on the Calendar. He said, if it happens that the day be a Saturday, there should be some special dispensation for the 7th Day Adventist Church members to take part in voting without compromising on their day of worship. Tlhaodi added that there must be People’s Complaint Commission in the country.
Speakers emphasized the need for the country to review the exercise of ‘Political Party Funding’. They articulated that lack of funding political parties’ results in political parties resorting to finding funds for themselves. They reiterated that sometimes going to the extent of getting funds through illegal means. Bangwato agreed in one accord that they want the President be tried whilst in office if suspected of any criminal offences. This was revealed in their contributions. They pointed out that, the law should not to wait until the end of their tenure.
For his part, the Deputy Chairperson of the Commission Johnson Motshwarakgole expressed gratitude to the residents of Serowe. He applauded women for their kindness saying it is only them, who always take responsibility for doing things amicably in the society.
Parliament has revealed that it plans to rollout a Community Score Card (CSC) exercise as part of sweeping reforms to its role and mandate among others.
The planed shakeup, along with the rollout of CSC will see creation of new Parliamentary Portfolio Committees on Health, HIV&AIDS, Education and Skills Development, Trade and Economic Development, Agriculture, Lands and Housing and Local Governance and Social Welfare. Parliament informed government ministries and departments that the CSC is a participatory, community based monitoring and evaluation tool that enables citizens to assess the quality of public services and interact with services providers to express their concerns.
According to Parliament, the CSC will assist to inform community members about available services and their entitlements and to solicit their opinions about the accessibility and quality of certain services related to the portfolio committees mentioned. It said the main objective is for Parliament through identified oversight committees is to conduct a participatory monitoring and evaluating process that puts ownership and responsibility for delivery of services in the hands of both the Government and the service recipients.
“Through scorecards developed around identified sectors and services, communities and implementing departments remain in touch with progress made through the programme delivery cycle and are able to respond timely to bottlenecks,” the National Assembly said. Some of the measurements and expected outcomes for the rolling out of the CSC include among others, improved monitoring and economic evaluation, to determine the impact of spending, so as to be able to direct resources from where they having the least benefit to those projects and programmes where they will have a larger positive impact.
The National Assembly explained further that this could result in a willingness to close down ineffective programmes and institutions and not to implement projects that do not deliver adequate returns, improved productivity in the public services, especially given the substantial pay increases.
The National Assembly believes that the rolling out of CSC is also expected to result in efficiency savings: many public services and programmes could be delivered more effectively at lower costs, by improving management and accountability, and making use of e-services. “This would yield financial savings that could be used for development programmes or reducing the deficit,” the National Assembly said.
The exercise is also expected to result in “Careful scrutiny of subsidy schemes and termination of those that do not address market failure or assist truly needy Batswana.” The National Assembly revealed that proposed Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Health and Wellness has been established in accordance with the Standing of National Assembly of Botswana. It explained that the mandate of the Committee is mainly to exercise Parliamentary oversight and scrutiny over Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies with portfolio responsibilities in respect of Health and HIV/AIDS.
“There is need to identify reasons for inefficiency and poor outcomes and ensure that health system reform improve productivity and value for money. Key areas of focus for scorecard, availability of drugs, staffing ratios, accessibility of health services, speciality care and services and sexual reproductively health,” the National Assembly said.
Another proposed Committee is on Local Governance and Social Welfare. The mandate of the Committee is mainly to exercise Parliamentary Oversight and Scrutiny over Government Ministries. Departments and Agencies with Portfolio responsibilities in respect of Local Governance and Social Welfare.
“Strategies under NDP 11 to improve outcomes of social uplifment include; diversiﬁcation of rural economies, development and support of small businesses, provision of social safety nets, eradication of absolute poverty, provision of quality and equitable education and harmonisation of social protection programmes,” said the National Assembly. It said social nets need to be improved so as to target these most in need (at present some social safety nets benefit many people who are not the most needy, but also miss out some of those who are needy).
“Some social development policies more broadly should also aim to reduce household vulnerability to shocks such as those arising from fluctuations in agriculture, climate change, incomes and employment and improve their ability to handle shocks, thereby building household resilience,” the National Assembly said.
Another Committee established is on Agriculture, Lands and Housing. The mandate of the Committee is mainly to exercise Parliamentary oversight and scrutiny over Government Institutions, Departments and Agencies with portfolio responsibilities in respect of Agriculture, Lands and Housing.
The National Assembly said the average growth rate of the agricultural sector since the beginning of National Development Plan 11 (NDP11) (i.e. during the 2017/2018 and 2018/19 financial years) was 2.5 percent, making it the slowest growing sector of the economy, in line with its historical performance.
“Over the same period, its share of GDP has been stagnant at around 2 percent. The sector also contributes job opportunities for about 80 000 adults. Food security has become paramount since the onset of the corona virus pandemic,” the National Assembly said. The National Assembly said the Government realises the need to increase food production for products in which Botswana has a cooperative advantage such as beef, grains and other horticulture products.
The Committee on Finance, Trade and Economic Development has also been established. One of the mandates of Committee would be to exercise Parliamentary oversight and scrutiny over government ministries, departments and agencies with portfolio responsibilities in respect of Finance, Development, Trade and Industry.
“The sector is at the core of industrialisation aspirations and strategies for economic development in Botswana. Manufacturing in particular can be the driver of economic growth through technological improvements and innovation,” the National Assembly said. Hence, it said, the development of the sector could also foster export diversification and export led-growth in Botswana while benefitting from the African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA).
Two senior members of Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC) have threatened legal action against Directorate of Intelligence and Security (DIS), it has transpired. The threat is contained in an answering affidavit of Director General of DCEC, Tymon Katlholo in which he is seeking an interdiction from High Court to stop the DIS from accessing investigation files at his office.
After the DIS detained DCEC officials Joao Salbany and Tsholofelo Bareetsi on December 16, 2021, they filed an official complaint against DIS and some officials. They complained about abuse of office by DIS and five officers. Salbany and Bareetsi also complained about unlawful detention by DIS and unlawful dissemination of classified information contrary to Section 44 of Corruption and Economic Crime Act. “The DIS interviews were premised on information divulged during the course of official DCEC work product, that is the Monday media brief meeting,” they wrote.
They further requested leave to institute a civil suit against the DIS and its officers, and invariably the State for inhuman and degrading treatment they suffered and unlawful detention. They also pondered a declaratory seeking a sanction against the DIS and Botswana Police Service (BPS) and clarification of the role of BPS officers seconded to DIS.
“The envisaged suit against BPS and DIS officers and the DIS will inevitably centre on investigations done by the DCEC and the scope of the protection availed to DCEC officers for conduct done in the course and scope of DCEC official duties.” The duo said it was self-evident from the conduct of the DIS officers that there was nothing urgent about the information required by the DIS, justifying their detention at its Sebele facility from 08:30 hours on December 16, 2021 until 02:00 hours on December 17, 2021.
They reasoned that the information required by the DIS could have been obtained by a simple request to DCEC Director General. “What the DIS did was to seek to intimidate officers of the DCEC whom they knew were carrying out investigations against some of the DIS officers who were part of their investigation team. This turn of events has a chilling effect not only on the functioning of the DCEC but also on the official conduct of officers of the DCEC as to how they conduct their official duties.”
They concluded by stating that in the event the request is granted, they would further request to be advised as to the provision of legal representation as the unalwful detention and the degrading and inhuman treatment by the DIS was in relation to matters conducted by and on behalf of the DCEC.