Whilst mastering an art known as ‘Systems Thinking’, ‘Systemic Thinking’ or ‘Fifth Discipline’ plus the wide-ranging work of renowned American systems scientist, Peter Senge, I learnt of the ‘11 Laws of the Fifth Discipline’ as a key tool of dealing with dynamic complexities and uncovering patterns. For this installment I focus on law Number 1, which reads, ‘Todays problems are a result of Yesterday’s solution’.
This simply means the problems we battle with ‘Today’ are largely a result of a series of solutions that seemed right ‘Yesterday’. In this regard I believe the greatest task for our generation is to learn to avoid sowing the seeds of Tomorrow’s problems with convenient, superficial, short term solutions ‘Today’. ‘Today’ our communities and nation are battling various acute challenges that are largely a direct result of decisions taken in the past ‘Yesterday’.
These challenges include; the current persistent market and labour hardships as a direct result of disregarding the ‘Education with Production’ model proposed by legendary educationalist, Patrick van Rensburg; or the current unsettling basic education retention and completion challenges we face as a long term outcome of ignoring public Early Childhood Education (ECE) suggested in the 1993 Kedikilwe Education Commission; or the sky-rocketing unemployment levels as a direct result of successfully exporting raw products at the expense of decent job creation through value addition industries; or the deliberate crippling of agricultural activities and industries in our country in pursuit of westernization, globalization and modernization, in the process creating food security and food self-reliance challenges whilst propelling abject poverty and malnutrition; or the heavy centralization of public and private goods and services which in the process excluded and marginalized many communities whilst fueling squatter settlements and spread of diseases in addition countless socioeconomic aches.
One of the suicidal decisions (from Yesterday) that has started troubling us (Today) is the decision to permit Cooperatives to die a natural/unnatural death, this has directly contributed to the current disheartening levels of income inequalities, poverty and citizen exploitation. Cooperatives are associations of people who voluntarily cooperate for their mutual social, economic and/or cultural benefit (Herry etal, 1996). I know most people believe Cooperatives are an out-dated model with no space in modern society where capitalism (self-enrichment) and individualism are the order of the day.
I do not blame you; I also used to think that way till I comprehensively interrogated Kenya’s GDP (Gross Domestic Product) composition and learnt that Cooperatives account for at least 45% of the country’s GDP. ILO (2009) established that 63% of the Kenyan population derives their livelihoods from Cooperatives. In Kenya cooperatives are like diamonds in Botswana. I find the Kenya model is praiseworthy and inspirational. Cooperatives are not only preferred for their direct and huge link to GDP increase and Economic Diversification, they are also desired for their unique link to inclusive economic growth, employment creation and, fair wealth distribution among community members and households.
Among her many national development aches, Botswana continues to fight a seemingly hopeless battle against; high income inequalities, poverty, unemployment, constrained resources and, economic diversification among others. Unlike most development models and programs the Cooperatives model is one of the most strategic models as it has an direct upward linkage to these socioeconomic troubles.
The cooperative movement in Botswana is reported to have been in existence as early as independence as a means of empowering citizens to participate in the social and economic development process.
They (cooperatives) are reported to have done remarkably well for the first 2 decades and their performance thereafter has never been effective or satisfactory, eventually reaching a point of paralysis. Thus, they have not been able to create employment opportunities, provide socioeconomic protection to the members and, their economic output is negligible. In my opinion, cooperatives were fundamentally crippled by negligence or apathy if you like.
The negligence herein is at all levels of the cooperatives movement (political/legislative, administrative and operational). My principle is to always give credit where it’s due, hence I must admit, in the past few years our country has made and witnessed commendable progress in its desire to revitalize and revamp the cooperatives movement in Botswana.
To be more specific, the bulk of this progress materialized during Hon. Dorcas Makgato-Malesu’s term at the helm of the Ministry of Trade & Industry (MTI), these include; the strategic Kenya, Lesotho and Tanzania benchmark and, landmark amendment of the Cooperative Society Act during the July 2013 parliamentary sitting.
Those that followed this transformation know very well how passionate she (Malesu) was/is about revitalization of the Cooperative Industries, only time can tell if her predecessors at Ministry the Trade & Industry will prioritize the same agenda in their to do list. I must also acknowledge the commendable work SPEDU (Selebi Phikwe Economic Diversification Unit) is doing in their endeavor to fruitfully revitalize the Cooperatives industries in Selebi Phikwe, I encourage likeminded institute to embrace a similar trend.
Though the multimillion pula Botswana Cooperative Training Center is faced with the usual public service challenges and delays, the little work they do and the remarkable work they intended to do is really commendable and inspiring, despite the fact that little is known about their existence, mandate and location. It would be deceitful for me to claim there is not even a single Cooperative existing and perhaps flourishing in Botswana, via the media and academic case-studies we learn there is a hand full of cooperatives that are surviving and somewhat doing well. We need to commend these cooperatives, celebrate them and use them to inspire establishment of more and more cooperatives in our mineral based economy.
Just like we did after realizing the significant link between agriculture, GDP, employment creation, food security and food self-reliance, we made and continue to make deliberate aggressive decisions to drive compatriots back to their abounded lands to resurrect ploughing and rearing livestock. It is equally important for us to extend the same urgency and will to aggressive resurrection of the Cooperative movement in Botswana, esp. among the Youth cohorts. The stigma and misconception erroneously associated with cooperatives ought to be demolished and its benefits persuasively publicized.
Equally paramount for the Ministry of Youth and all Youth development stakeholders to embrace and aggressively mainstream the spirit of Cooperatives among the Youth from a very early age through its myriad and parallel Youth development initiatives. In an era were funds are said to be constrained or limited, it is essential for the Cooperatives model to be incorporated and mainstreamed into the Youth development agenda. This does not mean the Ministry of Youth setting up a new Youth program/initiative as it is tradition and expectation.
This simply means the Ministry of Youth should collaborate with Botswana Cooperative Training Center for the cooperatives training and counseling component. Secondly; the Ministry of Education and Skills Development, HRDC (Human Resource Development Council) and any other stakeholder responsible for the curriculum review and development process to ensure the element and tradition of cooperatives is incorporated in the curriculum and planted in the minds of our citizens from a very early age.
This will mean more and more young people are well empowered on Cooperatives from a tender age; hence they grow with sound understanding of the Cooperative industry. In this trying national development times’ esp. exclusive growth, unequal distribution of wealth and employment creation, we have no choice; we are forced to remember and return to ‘the future we left behind’.
* Taziba is Youth Advocate, Columnist & Researcher with keen interest in Youth Policy, Civic Engagement, Social Inclusion and Capacity Development
US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has violated the One-China policy, and caused the escalation of tensions across the Taiwan Strait. Experts and political observers across the spectra agree that Pelosi’s actions and subsequent pronouncements by US President Joe Biden gave impetus to an already simmering tension in the Taiwan Strait, provoking China to strengthen its legitimate hold on the Taiwan Strait waters, which the US and Taiwan deem as ‘international waters’.
Pelosi’s visit to China’s Taiwan region has been heavily criticised across the globe, with China arguing that this is a serious violation of the one-China principle and the provisions of the three China-US Joint Communiqués. In response to this reckless move which seriously undermined China’s sovereignty, and interfered in China’s internal affairs, the expectation is for China to give a firm response. Pelosi visit violated the commitments made by the U.S. side, and seriously jeopardized peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.
To give context to China’s position over Taiwan region, the history behind gives us perspective. It is also important to note that the history between China and Taiwan is well documented and the US has always recognized it.
The People’s Republic of China recognises Taiwan as its territory. It has always been the case even before the Nationalist Republic of China government fled to the previously Japanese-ruled Island after losing the civil war on the mainland in 1949. According to literature that threat was contained for decades — first with a military alliance between the US and the ROC on Taiwan, and after Washington switched diplomatic recognition to the PRC in 1979 by the US One China policy, which acknowledges Beijing’s position that Taiwan is part of One China. Effectively, Taiwan’s administration was transferred to the Republic of China from Japan after the Second World War in 1945, along with the split between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) as a consequence of the Chinese Civil War. Disregarding this history, as the US is attempting to do, will surely initiate some defence reaction on the side of China to affirm its sovereignty.
However, this history was undermined since Taiwan claimed to democratise in the 1990s and China has grown ever more belligerent. Furthermore, it is well documented that the Biden administration, following the Trump presidency, has made subtle changes in the way it deals with Taipei, such as loosening restrictions on US officials meeting Taiwanese officials – this should make China uneasy. And while the White House continues to say it does not support Taiwanese independence, Biden’s words and actions are parallel to this pledge because he has warned China that the US would intervene militarily if China attacked Taiwan – another statement that has provoked China.
Pelosi, in her private space, would know that her actions amount to provocation of China. This act of aggression by the USA seriously undermines the virtues of sovereignty and territorial integrity which has a huge potential to destabilize not only the Taiwan Strait but the whole of the Asia- Pacific region. The Americans know very well that their provocative behavior is deliberately invoking the spirit of separatism masqueraded as “Taiwan independence”. The US is misled to think that by supporting separatism of Taiwan from China that would give them an edge over China in a geopolitics. This is what one Chinese diplomat said this week: “The critical point is if every country put their One-China policy into practice with sincerity, with no compromise, is going to guarantee the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.” Therefore, it was in the wake of US House speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, that China, in a natural response revealed plans for unprecedented military exercises near the island, prompting fears of a crisis in the Taiwan Strait and the entire Asia-Pacific region. The world community must promote and foster peace, this may be achieved when international laws are respected. It may also happen when nations respect the sovereignty of another. China may be in a better space because it is well capacitated to stake its territorial integrity, what about a small nation, if this happens to it?
As to why military exercises by Beijing; it is an expected response because China was provoked by the actions of Pelosi. To fortify this position, Chinese President, Xi signed a legal basis for China’s People’s Liberation Army to “safeguard China’s national sovereignty, security and development interests”. The legal basis will also allow military missions around disaster relief, humanitarian aid and peacekeeping. In addition the legal changes would allow troops to “prevent spillover effects of regional instabilities from affecting China, secure vital transport routes for strategic materials like oil, or safeguard China’s overseas investments, projects and personnel. It then follows that President Xi’s administration cannot afford to look weak under a US provocation. President Xi must protector China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, of which Taiwan is a central part.” Beijing is very clear on One-China Policy, and expects all world players to recognize and respect it.
The People’s Liberation Army has made it clear that it has firepower that covers all of Taiwan, and it can strike wherever it wants. This sentiments have been attributed to Zhang Junshe, a researcher at the PLA Navy Research Institute. Zheng further said, “We got really close to Taiwan. We encircled Taiwan. And we demonstrated that we can effectively stop intervention by foreign forces.” This is a strong reaction from China to warn the US against provocation and violation of the One-China Policy.
Beijing’s military exercises will certainly shake Taiwan’s confidence in the sources of its economic and political survival. The potential for an effective blockade threatens the air and shipping routes that support Taiwan’s central role in global technology supply chains. Should a humanitarian situation arise in Taiwan, the blame would squarely be on the US.
As China’s military exercises along the Taiwan Strait progress and grow, it remains that the decision by Nancy Pelosi to visit China’s Taiwan region gravely undermined peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and sent a wrong signal to “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. This then speaks to international conventions, as the UN Secretary-General António Guterres explicitly stressed that the UN remains committed to the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758. The centerpiece is the one-China principle, namely, there is but one China in the world, the government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China, and Taiwan is a part of China. It must be noted that the US and the US-led NATO countries have selectively applied international law, this has been going on unabated. There is a plethora of actions that have collapsed several states after they were attacked under the pretext of the so-called possession of weapons of mass destruction illuminating them as threats – and sometimes even without any valid reason. to blatantly launch military strikes and even unleash wars on sovereign countrie
British novelist, W. Somerset Maugham once opined: “If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.”
The truism in these words cannot be underestimated, especially when contextualizing against the political developments in Botswana. We have become a nation that does not value democracy, yet nothing represent freedom more than democracy. In fact, we desire, and value winning power or clinging to power more than anything else, even if it harms the democratic credentials of our political institutions. This is happening across political parties — ruling and opposition.
As far as democracy is concerned, we are regressing. We are becoming worse-off than we were in the past. If not arrested, Botswana will lose its status as among few democratic nations in the Africa. Ironically, Botswana was the first country in Africa to embrace democracy, and has held elections every five years without fail since independence.
We were once viewed as the shining example of Africa. Those accolades are not worth it any more. Young democracies such as South Africa, with strong institutions, deserves to be exalted. Botswana has lost faith in democracy, and we will pay a price for it. It is a slippery slope to dictatorship, which will bring among other excess, assault on civil liberties and human rights violations.
Former President, Festus Mogae once stated that Botswana’s democracy will only become authentic, when a different party, other than the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) wins elections, and when the President of such party is not from Serowe.
Although many may not publicly care to admit, Mogae’s assertion is true. BDP has over the years projected itself as a dyed-in-the-wool proponent of democracy, but the moment its stay in power became threatened and uncertain, it started behaving in a manner that is at variance with democratic values. This has been happening over the years now, and the situation is getting worse by the day.
Recently, the BDP party leadership has been preaching compromise and consensus candidates for 2024 general elections. Essentially, the leadership has lost faith in the Bulela Ditswe dispensation, which has been used to selected party candidates for council and parliament since 2003. The leadership is discouraging democracy because they believe primary elections threaten party unity. It is a strange assertion indeed.
Bulela Ditswe was an enrichment of internal party democracy in the sense that it replaced the previous method of selection of candidates known as Committee of 18, in which a branch committee made of 18 people endorsed the representatives. While it is true that political contest can divide, the ruling party should be investing in political education and strengthening in its primary elections processes. Democracy does not come cheap or easy, but it is valuable.
Any unity that we desire so much at the expense of democracy is not true unity. Like W. Somerset Maugham said, democracy would be lost in the process, and ultimately, even the unity that was desired would eventually be lost too. Any solution that sacrifice democracy would not bring any results in the long run, except misery.
We have seen that also in opposition ranks. The Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) recently indicated that its incumbent Members of Parliament (MPs) should not be challenged for their seats. While BDP is sacrificing democracy to stay in power, UDC is sacrificing democracy to win power. It is a scary reality given the fact that both parties – ruling and opposition — have embraced this position and believe democracy is the hindrance to their political ambitions.
These current reality points to one thing; our political parties have lost faith in democracy. They desire power more than, the purpose of power itself. It is also a crisis of leadership across the political divide, where we have seen dissenting views being met with persecution. We have seen perverting of political process endorsed by those in echelons of power to manipulate political outcomes in their favour.
Democracy should not be optional, it should be mandatory. Any leader proposing curtailing of democracy should be viewed with suspicion, and his adventures should be rejected before it is too late. Members of political parties, as subscribers of democracy, should collectively rise to the occasion to save their democracy from self-interest that is becoming prevalent among Botswana political parties.
The so-called compromise candidates, only benefits the leadership because it creates comforts for them. But for members, and for the nation, it is causing damage by reversing the gains that have been made over the years. We should reject leaders who only preach democracy in word, but are hesitant to practice it.
Piracy of all kinds continues to have a massive impact on the global creative industry and the economies of the countries where it thrives.
One of the biggest misconceptions around piracy is that an individual consumer’s piracy activities, especially in a market the size of Botswana’s, is only a drop in the pool of potential losses to the different sectors of the economy piracy affects.
When someone sitting in Gaborone, Botswana logs onto an illegal site to download King Richard online, they don’t imagine that their one download will do anything to the production house’s pocket or make a dent in the actors’ net worth. At best, the sensitivity towards this illegal pirating activity likely only exists when contemplating going about pirating a local musician’s music or a short film produced locally.
The ripple effects of piracy at whatever scale reach far beyond what the average consumer could ever imagine. Figures released by software security and media technology company, Irdeto, show that users in five major African territories made approximately 17,4 million total visits to the top 10 identified piracy sites on the internet.
The economic impact of this on the creative industry alone soars to between 40 and 97.1 billion dollars, according a 2022 Dataprot study. In addition, they estimate that “illegally streamed copyrighted content consumes 24% of global bandwidth”.
As Botswana’s creative industry remains relatively slight on the scale of comparison to industries such as Nollywood and Nilewood where the creative industry contributes a huge proportion to West and East Africa’s respective GDPs, that does not imply that piracy activities in Botswana do not have a similar impact on our economy and the ability of our creative industry to grow.
When individuals make decisions to illegally consume content via internet streaming sites they believe they are saving money for themselves in the name of enjoying content they desire to consume. Although this is a personal choice that remains the prerogative of the consumer, looking beyond the fact that streaming on illegal content sites is piracy, the ripple effect of this decision also has an endless trail of impact where funds which could be used to grow the local creative industry through increased consumption, and revenue which would otherwise be fed back into Botswana’s economy are being diverted.
“Why can’t our local creative industry grow?” “Why don’t we see more home-grown films and shows in Botswana?” are questions constantly posed by those who consume television content in Botswana. The answer to this lies largely in the fact that Botswana’s local content needs an audience in order for it to grow. It needs support from government and entities which are in a position to fund and help the industry scale greater heights.
Any organisational body willing to support and grow the local creative industry needs to exist and operate in an economy which can support its mandates. Content piracy is a cycle that can only be alleviated when consumers make wiser decisions around what they consume and how.
This goes beyond eradicating piracy activities in so far as television content is concerned. This extends to the importation and trade in counterfeit goods, resale of goods and services not intended for resale across the border, outside its jurisdiction, and more. All of these activities stunt the growth of an economy and make it nearly impossible for industries and sectors to propel themselves to places where they can positively impact society and reinvest into the country’s economy.
So what can be done to turn the tide here in Botswana in order to see our local production houses gain the momentum required to produce more, license more and expand their horizons? While those who enforce the law continue to work towards minimizing piracy activities, it’s imperative that as consumers we work to make their efforts easier by being mindful of how our individual actions play a role in preventing the success of our local creative networks and our economy’s growth.
Whether you are pirating a Hollywood Blockbuster, illegally streaming a popular Motswana artist’s music, or smuggling in an illegal decoder to view content restricted to South Africa only, your actions have an impact on how we as a nation will make our mark on the global landscape with local creative productions. Thembi Legwaila is Corporate Affairs Manager, MultiChoice Botswana