Rre KT Motsete, a genius and a true patriot reminds us in our national anthem that: Fatshe leno la rona ke mpho ya Modimo ke boswa jwa bo rraetsho! This is our land, a God given gift and inheritance from our forefathers. It is “Boswa jwa rona”, meaning the community and nation, not any particular individuals.
In the past, the land belonged to the people. Balete, Bangwaketse, Barolong, Bakalanga, Banaro, Batawana, Bangwato, Bangologa etc, we all used to have land and there was no private ownership of land. Land belonged to the people. Under the private ownership of land system, the best and fertile land in the country is owned by very few rich people and the majority of them are not even indigenous Batswana.
When you look at the best land ko Gamalete the best land is in the hands of Batswana ba letso la seisemane (Batswana of English descent). Move along the Notwane, there is no Molete there all along you will find British citizens because they have dual citizenship. Balete are in the mountains where the land is barren! The same applies to other areas in Tswapong, Bukalanga and Ghanzi, the fertile land in those areas does not belong to the indeginous Batswana. It is only now that the rich few Batswana are starting to buy land in Gammangato, Ngwaketse, Ngamiland, Kgalagadi and other places in Botswana.
It is also interesting to note that today the Gaborone dam is dry and the government is going to use tax payers’ money to pump water from the north while there are seventeen dams in privately owned land full of water along the Notwane and Moswane rivers. If these dams were not in privately owned land, the two rivers would be flowing into the Gaborone dam.
How do you ask people to preserve water while the few rich people around Gaborone use water to irrigate their big gardens where they plant vegetables and sell to Balete who own the land but who have no water and land?
Theologically speaking this is sinful because Balate and Batlokwa have been robbed of their land, their children have become destitutes and criminals. Because they have no land to stay and cultivate, they come to the city and in the city they are paid slave wages by the same people who robbed them of their land. Now who is a criminal, the one who has robbed someone of his land and forced him to go to town where there are no jobs and ended up stealing from the shop of the same person who stole his land?
The question is not a legal question but a moral and theological question. We want to know who issued land ownership certificates for this British / Batswana citizens in Notwane and Mmokolodi. Balete and Kweneng land boards must tell us. Balete and Kweneng land boards must do what Tawana land board did when they told Batswana that they are the one who gave the Khama brothers our land in the Okavango. We are going to take them to task because they will explain to us who authorized them to do that. The Tawana land board has no right what so ever to give people land or plots, without the approval or recommendation of the land overseer in the area plus the neighbours. All the lands, in Ngamiland have the land overseers.
Let me put it in Setswana. The land overseer’s ke batlhokomedi ba lehatshe. Traditionally ba tlhokometse lehatshe mo boemong jwa beeng ba lehatshe kgotsa kgosi. They must approve any application for any plot. We want Diseta Island to be returned to the Shakawe community immediately and the chiefs island in the delta to be return to kgosi Tawana II immediately because Chiefs Island is the property of the Batawana chiefs where they were hidden by Bayei during the Bakololo war. Now we are told the island has been taken by the central government.
How on earth can government deprive Tawana what is rightly fully his? This land was allocated to Tawana’s grandparents by Bayei during those wars. And remember if it was not the combination of the Batawana and Bayei forces, this area could be part of western province in Zambia or Barotseland. Did our parents fought for this land so that Khama can come and take it from us? Or does Khama don’t know the history of this country? I mean history of Batswana as told from generation to generation by word of mouth not the one written by those who want to please their masters in order to be rewarded by those they praise at the expense of the heroic history of our people.
We also want land certificates in Gantsi from those who took the land of Banaro and Bakaukau in Gantsi. We are fully aware that most if not all white farmers in Gantsi district have South Africa citizenship. Remember in 1966 some of this white farmers flew to South Africa, claiming that they cannot be under black government. Ga ba kake ba nna ka fa tlase ga puso ya botho montsho bone ga be battle go busiwa ke kafore. Baraye Seretse. Can you imagine. And some of them sold their farms to Rra Gaone, Rre Masire bought some of the farms. They only returned later. Now this same racist people are the ones who decide where we should sell our beef! They must never forget that Banaro, Bakaukau and want their land, not only in the CKGR but in the whole Gantsi District.
We should know that, the monopolization of land and other resources necessarily results in the exploitation of non monopolized resources, that is, labour, and in the underutization of all resources. Thus one primary purpose of ownership of large amounts of land, both on the individual and on the social level, is not to use it but to prevent its use by others. These others; denied access to the primary resource, necessarily fall under the domination of the few who controls it. And then they are exploited in all conceivable ways, typically through low wages. We must not forget that majority of our towns started as mining towns.
People were removed from their lands and forced to work as cheap laborours in these towns. Right now in Toteng in Ngamiland people have been removed from their grazing land to pave way for the mine. Now we are told the mine is being closed or going to be closed soon. We are also told that diamonds have been discovered in Shakawe and people are going to be removed from their places. People are going to be removed along the delta either for mines or tourism. And remember this mines, and tourist industries are not owned by Batswana. Our fertile land is being taken from us and given to foreigners in the name of foreign investments. We want our land not foreign investment because we can invest in our land ourselves!
We are being deliberately being impoverished. In the so called foreign investments the workers are paid slave wages. This maldistribution of wealth rewards parates at the expense of workers. Many are diverted from grasping that inequitable land arrangements are a fundamental cause of poverty because of the common habit of associating land only with agriculture and rural life. Because society is increasingly urban and industrial, this outlook makes land seem a quaint concern from by gone past.
Land looms much larger than that. All human existence still rests on the land. Urban poverty is not only exacerbated by the influx of landless people from the villages. It arises directly from maldistribution and over concentration of land rights within town or cities. City people also live and work on lands.
From a theological point of view poverty is preeminently a problem of land ownership, it becomes imperative to examine the moral basis of ownership. What gives us the right to own anything? And how does this apply to land? The right of ownership does not come out of thin air but rest n our faith that human beings have been created as free moral agents, called to glorify their creator through voluntary obedience to his will. To function as such, an individual must have a right to his or her person and to his or her labour, which is an extension of this person.
The exercise of this right includes the right to consume exchange, give away, or simply keep what you produce. This right obtains against all other human beings, limited only by acts that interfere with the rights of others to what they produce. It is on this account that theft is wrong, it constitutes a sort of partial murder – taking of someone’s crystallized past life. If it is on this account than humankind finally came around to consider slavery wrong as an unconscionable total theft of someone’s labour. Ownership is thus justified by labour.
This concept, associated with John Locke can also traced back to the Deuteronomy 25: 4 and 1 Cor. 9: 7 – 10 we own and consume what we produce. Human labour never produces land. God’s labour produced land, so from theological point no human being should own land. John Locke affirms that God gave land or the world to human being in common usage. In my view no nation or community ever had a legitimate right to grant to private parties absolute title to something created by God / nature for the use and benefit all. It is from this background that we want all lands to be returned to their rightful owners the communities including Diseta, chiefs Island Mmokolodi, and Notwane farms!
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” Carl Sagan
Corruption is a heavy price to pay. The clean ones pay and suffer at the mercy of people who cannot have enough. They always want to eat and eat so selfishly like a bunch of ugly masked shrews. I hope God forgives me for ridiculing his creatures, but that mammal is so greedy. But corruption is not the new kid on the block, because it has always been everywhere.
This of course begs the question, why that is so? The common answer was and still is – abuse and misuse of power by those in power and weak institutions, disempowered to control the leaders. In 1996, the then President of The World Bank, James D. Wolfensohn named the ‘C-Word’ for the first time during an annual meeting of the Bretton Woods Institutions. A global fight against corruption started. Transparency International began its work. Internal and external audits mushroomed; commissions of inquiry followed and ever convoluted public tender procedures have become a bureaucratic nightmare to the private sector, trying to fight red tape.
The result is sobering corruption today is worse than it was 25 years ago. There is no denying that strong institutions help, but how does it come that in the annual Transparency International Ranking the same group of countries tend to be on the top while another group of countries, many African among them, tend to be on the bottom? Before one jumps to simple and seductive conclusions let us step back a moment.
Wolfensohn called corruption a cancer that destroys economies like a cancer destroys a body. A cancer is, simplified, good cells in a body gone bad, taking control of more and more good cells until the entire body is contaminated and eventually dies. So, let us look at the good cells of society first: they are family ties, clan and tribe affiliation, group cohesion, loyalty, empathy, reciprocity.
Most ordinary people like the reader of these lines or myself would claim to share such values. Once we ordinary people must make decisions, these good cells kick in: why should I hire a Mrs. Unknown, if I can hire my niece whose strengths and weaknesses I know? If I hire the niece, she will owe me and support my objectives.
Why should I purchase office furniture from that unknown company if I know that my friend’s business has good quality stuff? If I buy from him, he will make an extra effort to deliver his best and provide quality after sales service? So, why go through a convoluted tender process with uncertain outcome? In the unlikely case my friend does not perform as expected, I have many informal means to make him deliver, rather than going through a lengthy legal proceeding?
This sounds like common sense and natural and our private lives do work mostly that way and mostly quite well.
The problem is scale. Scale of power, scale of potential gains, scale of temptations, scale of risk. And who among us could throw the first stone were we in positions of power and claim not to succumb to the temptations of scale? Like in a body, cancer cells start growing out of proportion.
So, before we call out for new leaders – experience shows they are rarely better than the old ones – we need to look at ourselves first. But how easy is that? If I were the niece who gets the job through nepotism, why should I be overly critical? If I got a big furniture contract from a friend, why should I spill the beans? What right do I have to assume that, if I were a president or a minister or a corporate chief procurement officer I would not be tempted?
This is where we need to learn. What is useful, quick, efficient, and effective within a family or within a clan or a small community can become counterproductive and costly and destructive at larger corporate or national scale. Our empathy with small scale reciprocity easily permeates into complacency and complicity with large scale corruption and into an acquiescence with weak institutions to control it.
Our institutions can only be as strong as we wish them to be.
I was probably around ten years old and have always been that keen enthusiastic child that also liked to sing the favourite line of, ‘the world will become a better place.’ I would literally stand in front of a mirror and use my mom’s torch as a mic and sing along Michael Jackson’s hit song, ‘We are the world.’
Despite my horrible voice, I still believed in the message. Few years later, my annoyance towards the world’s corrupt system wonders whether I was just too naïve. Few years later and I am still in doubt so as to whether I should go on blabbing that same old boring line. ‘The world is going to be a better place.’ The question is, when?
The answer is – as always: now.
This is pessimistic if not fatalistic – I challenge Sagan’s outlook with a paraphrased adage of unknown origin: Some people can be bamboozled all of the time, all people can be bamboozled some of the time, but never will all people be bamboozled all of the time.
We, the people are the only ones who can heal society from the cancer of corruption. We need to understand the temptation of scale and address it. We need to stop seeing ourselves just a victim of a disease that sleeps in all of us. We need to give power to the institutions that we have put in place to control corruption: parliaments, separation of power, the press, the ballot box. And sometimes we need to say as a niece – no, I do not want that job as a favour, I want it because I have proven to be better than other contenders.
It is going to be a struggle, because it will mean sacrifices, but sacrifices that we have chosen, not those imposed on us.
Let us start today.
*Bokani Lisa Motsu is a student at University of Botswana
Parliament, the second arm of State through its parliamentary committees are one of Botswana’s most powerful mechanisms to ensure that government is held accountable at all times. The Accounting Officers are mostly Permanent Secretaries across government Ministries and Chief Executive Officers, Director Generals, Managing Directors of parastatals, state owned enterprises and Civil Society.
So parliament plays its oversight authority via the legislators sitting on a parliamentary committee and Accounting Officers sitting in the hot chair. When left with no proper checks and balances, the Executive is prone to abuse the arrangement and so systematic oversight of the executive is usually carried out by parliamentary committees. They track the work of various government departments and ministries, and conduct scrutiny into important aspects of their policy, direction and administration.
It is not rocket science that effective oversight requires that committees be totally independent and able to set their own agendas and have the power to summon ministers and top civil servants to appear and answer questions. Naturally, Accounting Officers are the highest ranking officials in the government hierarchy apart from cabinet Ministers and as such wield much power and influence in the performance of government. To illustrate further, government performance is largely owed to the strategic and policy direction of top technocrats in various Ministries.
It is disheartening to point out that the recent parliament committees — as has been the case all over the years — has laid bare the incompetency, inadequacy and ineptitude of people bestowed with great responsibilities in public offices. To say that they are ineffective and inefficient sounds as an understatement. Some appear useless and hopeless when it comes to running the government despite the huge responsibility they possess.
If we were uncertain about the degree at which the Accounting Officers are incompetent, the ongoing parliament committees provide a glaring answer. It is not an exaggeration to say that ordinary people on the streets have been held ransom by these technocrats who enjoy their air conditioned offices and relish being chauffeured around in luxurious BX SUV’s while the rest of the citizenry continue to suffer. Because of such high life the Accounting Officers seem to have, with time, they have gotten out of touch with the people they are supposed to serve.
An example; when appearing before the recent Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Office of the President Permanent Secretary, Thuso Ramodimoosi, looked reluctant to admit misuse of public funds. Although it is clear funds were misused, he looked unbothered when committee members grilled him over the P80 million Orapa House building that has since morphed into a white elephant for close to 10 successive years. To him, it seems it did not matter much and PAC members were worried for nothing.
On a separate day, another Accounting officer, Director of Public Service Management (DPSM), Naledi Mosalakatane, was not shy to reveal to PAC upon cross-examination that there exist more than 6 000 vacancies in government. Whatever reasons she gave as an excuse, they were not convincing and the committee looked sceptical too. She was faltering and seemed not to have a sense of urgency over the matter no matter how critical it is to the populace.
Botswana’s unemployment rate hoovers around 18 percent in a country where majority of the population is the youth, and the most affected by unemployment. It is still unclear why DPSM could underplay such a critical matter that may threaten the peace and stability of the country. Accounting Officers clearly appear out of touch with the reality out there – if the PAC examinations are anything to go by.
Ideally the DPSM Director could be dropping the vacancy post digits while sourcing funds and setting timelines for the spaces to be filled as a matter of urgency so that the citizens get employed to feed their families and get out of unemployment and poverty ravaging the country. The country should thank parliamentary committees such as PAC to expose these abnormalities and the behaviour of our leaders when in public office. How can a full Accounting Officer downplay the magnitude of the landless problem in Botswana and fail to come with direct solutions tailor made to provide Batswana with the land they desperately need?
Land is a life and death matter for some citizens, as we would know.
When Bonolo Khumotaka, the Accounting Officer in the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services, whom as a top official probably with a lucrative pay too appears to be lacking sense of urgency as she is failing on her key mandate of working around the clock to award the citizens with land especially those who need it most like the marginalised. If government purports they need P94 billion to service land to address the land crisis what is plan B for government? Are we going to accept it the way it is?
Government should wake up from its slumber and intervene to avoid the 30 years unnecessary waiting period in State land and 13 years in Tribal land. Accounting Officers are custodians of government policy, they should ensure it is effective and serve its purpose. What we have been doing over the years, has proved that it is not effective, and clearly there is a need for change of direction.
His Excellency Dr Mokgweetsi EK Masisi, the President of the Republic of Botswana found it appropriate to invoke Section 17 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Botswana, using the powers vested in him to declare a State of Public Emergency starting from the 2nd April 2020 at midnight.
The constitutional provision under Section 17 (2b) only provided that such a declaration could be up to a maximum of 21 days. His Excellency further invoked Section 93 (1) to convene an extra- ordinary meeting of Parliament to have the opportunity to consult members of parliament on measures that have been put in place to address the spread and transmission of the virus. At this meeting Members of Parliament passed a resolution on the legal instruments and regulations governing the period of the state of emergency, and extended its duration by six (6) months.
The passing of the State of Emergency is considered as a very crucial step in fighting the near apocalyptic potential of the Novel COVID-19 virus. One of the interesting initiatives that was developed and extended to the business community was a 3-month wage subsidy that came with a condition that no businesses would retrench for the duration of the State of Public Emergency. This has potentially saved many people’s jobs as most companies would have been extremely quick to reduce expenses by downsizing. Self-preservation as some would call it.
Most organisations would have tried to reduce costs by letting go of people, retreated and tried their best to live long enough to fight another day. In my view there is silver lining that we need to look at and consider. The fact that organisations are not allowed to retrench has forced certain companies to look at the people with a long-term view.
Most leaders have probably had to wonder how they are going to ensure that their people are resilient. Do they have team members who innovate and add value to the organisation during these testing times? Do they even have resilient people or are they just waiting for the inevitable end? Can they really train people and make them resilient? How can your team members be part of your recovery plan? What can they do to avoid losing the capabilities they need to operate meaningfully for the duration of the State of Public Emergency and beyond?
The above questions have forced companies to reimagine the future of work. The truth is that no organisation can operate to its full potential without resilient people. In the normal business cycle, new teams come on board; new business streams open, operations or production sites launch or close; new markets develop, and technology is introduced. All of this provides fresh opportunities – and risks.
The best analogy I have seen of people-focused resilience planning reframes employees as your organisation’s immune system, ready and prepared to anticipate risks and ensure they can tackle challenges, fend off illness and bounce back more quickly. So, how do you supercharge your organizational immune system to become resilient?
COVID-19 has helped many organisations realize they were not as prepared as they believed themselves to be. Now is the time to take stock and reset for the future. All the strategies and plans prior to COVID-19 arriving in Botswana need to be thrown out of the window and you need to develop a new plan today. There is no room for tweaking or reframing. Botswana has been disrupted and we need to accept and embrace the change. What we initially anticipated as a disease that would take a short term is turning out to be something we are going to have to live with for a much longer time. It is going to be a marathon and therefore businesses need to have a plan to complete this marathon.
Start planning. Planning for change can help reduce employee stress, anxiety, and overall fear, boosting the confidence of staff and stakeholders. Think about conducting and then regularly refreshing a strategic business impact analysis, look at your employee engagement scores, dig into your customer metrics and explore the way people work alongside your behaviours and culture. This research will help to identify what you really want to protect, the risks that you need to plan for and what you need to survive during disruption. Don’t forget to ask your team members for their input. In many cases they are closest to critical business areas and already have ideas to make processes and systems more robust.
Revisit your organisational purpose. Purpose, values and principles are powerful tools. By putting your organisation’s purpose and values front and center, you provide clear decision-making guidelines for yourself and your organisation. There are very tough and interesting decisions to make which have to be made fast; so having guiding principles on which the business believes in will help and assist all decision makers with sanity checking the choices that are in front of them. One noticeable characteristic of companies that adapt well during change is that they have a strong sense of identity. Leaders and employees have a shared sense of purpose and a common performance culture; they know what the company stands for beyond shareholder value and how to get things done right.
Revisit your purpose and values. Understand if they have been internalised and are proving useful. If so, find ways to increase their use. If not, adapt them as necessities, to help inspire and guide people while immunizing yourself against future disruption. Design your employee experience. The most resilient, adaptive and high performing companies are made up of people who know each other, like each other, and support each other.
Adaptability requires us to teach other, speak up and discuss problems, and have a collective sense of belonging. Listening to your team members is a powerful and disruptive thing to do. It has the potential to transform the way you manage your organisation. Enlisting employees to help shape employee experience, motivates better performance, increases employee retention and helps you spot issues and risks sooner. More importantly, it gives employees a voice so you can get active and constructive suggestions to make your business more robust by adopting an inclusive approach.
Leaders need to show they care. If you want to build resilience, you must build on a basis of trust. And this means leaders should listen, care, and respond. It’s time to build the entire business model around trust and empathy. Many of the employees will be working under extreme pressure due to the looming question around what will happen when companies have to retrench. As a leader of a company transparency and open communication are the most critical aspects that need to be illustrated.
Take your team member into confidence because if you do have to go through the dreaded excise of retrenchment you have to remember that those people the company retains will judge you based on the process you follow. If you illustrate that the business or organization has no regard for loyalty and commitment, they will never commit to the long-term plans of the organisation which will leave you worse off in the end. Its an absolutely delicate balance but it must all be done in good faith. Hopefully, your organization will avoid this!
This is the best time to revisit your identify and train your people to encourage qualities that build strong, empathetic leadership; self-awareness and control, communication, kindness and psychological safety. Resilience is the glue that binds functional silos and integrates partners, improves communications, helps you prepare, listen and understand. Most importantly, people-focused resilience helps individuals and teams to think collectively and with empathy – helping you respond and recover faster.
Article written by Thabo Majola, a brand communications expert with a wealth of experience in the field and is Managing Director of Incepta Communications.