A perception has been deliberately created by western powers through their news media that terrorism is a result of Islamic extremism or Jihadists.
This perception is not only false but deceptive and dangerous. The fact of the matter is that imperialism at its last stage, being neo-colonialism has not only become so cruel and greedy but very much sophisticated in such a way that it exploits in the name of aid and investments. It goes even further to oppress in the name of democracy.
For the past thirty years, or so, the world has changed drastically due to science and technology. The western powers no longer need to occupy or colonize a country in order to rob it of its natural resources. The multinational companies or corporations do the dirty work of stealing from developing countries.
Anyone who resists this cruelty of this corporation is label a terrorist or religious extremist. It is oil from Muslim countries that makes the western world go around. When people see their wealth being taken from them, while they remain poor, they appeal to God almighty to intervene.
When young Muslims shout God is great and go to the battle front to face the American or French bullets, it does not mean that their religion is pushing them to do so. Anger has become their fuel, anger brewing from seeing the Americans or French or the British stealing their oil and other natural wealth. It is only a fool who will laugh when his/her property is taken from her.
You don’t need to be a critical thinker to know that Saddam Hussein was murdered because of Iraq oil not because of weapons of mass destruction. If you still believe that theory then you leave in another planet. Some of us are fully aware that Maumar Gaddafi was murdered for two reasons; first because he wanted to unite Africa in order to make Africa stronger and resist imperialism which is a product of capitalism. As Michael D. Yates said, when capitalism began to spread to Africa, Asia and Latin America, European capitalists had already learnt the art of property theft.
The degree of destruction of indigenous people was unprecedented in its magnitude. Millions were murdered and millions more died of diseases and millions were enslaved. Wealth was looted as fast it could be taken and put on ships bound for Europe. The first stage of imperialism is indeed colonialism.
These killings of people and looting of their wealth led to the struggle for independence in Africa, Asia and Latin American. And those who were fighting wars of liberation were labeled terrorists. Ben Bella of Algeria, Jomo Kenyatta, Julius Nyerere, Kenneth Kaunda, Samora Machel, Nelson Mandela etc were once imprisoned because they were regarded as terrorists. Innocent and peace loving people were by a stroke of a pen turned into dangerous terrorists and their organizations banned. In Latin America Priests and Bishops like Oscar Romero were killed as dangerous terrorists.
I don’t support nor encourage terrorism, my argument however is that it is the brutality and inhuman system of imperialism which has turned innocent peace loving people into blood thirsty terrorists. These blood thirsty terrorist are doing exactly what the imperialists have been doing and continue to do to our people. When great kingdoms and civilization like the Maya kingdom were destroyed in the Americas nobody said a word. Those who hunted and killed people like animals have no moral right to call Boko Haram or Isis Barbaric.
The cruelty of Europeans did not end with slavery or colonialism. Today imperialism and the imperialists are crueler than before. Under so called globalization imperialism has become so inhuman because it is invisible. In today’s world corporations or multinational companies are doing the dirty jobs for their governments. Sharon Delgado was right in saying, as corporations gain more power in relation to governments, they are remaking governments in their image.
Thomas Friedman said, “This is not so bad, that it can actually be seen as form of democracy. Joining the global economy and plugging into Electronic Herd is the equivalent of taking your country public. It is the equivalent of turning you country into a public company, only the shareholders are no longer, just your own citizens. And they don’t vote, just vote every five years. They vote every hour, every day, through their mutual funds, their pension funds, their brokers, and more and more from their own basements via Internet.”
But one dollar one vote through stock market does not make democracy. This is speculation not representation. It has nothing to do with democracy that is with weighing issues, taking responsibility and making decisions to further the common good. This may be plutocracy that is rule by the wealthy, or corporations, but is not democracy. It is a form of global corporate rule. Wilderness Safari is a good example of a multinational corporation making critical decision for Botswana.
Hunting is banned in this country in the name of preserving our wild life while the truth is that wildness safari wants to make money out of our animals. That is why decision to ban hunting was not taken by parliament or cabinet but taken elsewhere and we were only informed.
Because of the hunting ban in Botswana, wild animals have multiplied at an alarming rate. Elephants and Buffaloes are all over the country, destroying crops, spreading foot and mouth disease and above all killing people. And the government cannot do anything because imperialism is the one saying hunting should be banned in Botswana.
Kgosi Tawana II recently said that there were some voices in Ngamiland who are calling for an independent Ngamiland. These voices shall soon turn into terrorists which we don’t want.
But people are hungry and angry. The banning of hunting, the banning of fishing in Lake Ngami while people are starving because people did not plough because there was no rain even if it rained, their crops could have been eaten and destroyed by elephants.
This cruelty and inhumane practice carried out by imperialist good boys are not reported by CNN, BBC, Sky News or even France 24. As much as we condemn terrorist and its barbaric and cruel acts we must also look at our own!
Imperialism has no shame, just as they enslaved, colonized murdered the Mayas in the Americas, people in Africa without shame. They can hide behind the big corporate world. But some of us can still see how cruel they are.
In Botswana De Beers and Wilderness Safari are their agents. Agents of Imperialism! In my view De Beers is committing a crime against humanity by taking diamonds from Boteti people and leaving them as destitute while their diamonds from Orapa and Letlhakane are building Palaces and buying islands, somewhere in the pacific!
Wildness safari is also committing crime against humanity by making the people of Ngamiland, C.K.G.R destitute by controlling wild animals in those Areas. This cruelty and inhumane and barbaric acts of this imperialist corporate giants acting on behalf of imperialism needs to be stopped before they turn our children or grand children into these killing machines called terrorists. We don’t want that to happen!
This is a question that should seriously exercise the mind of every Botswana citizen and every science researcher, every health worker and every political leader political.
The Covid-19 currently defines our lives and poses a direct threat to every aspect and every part of national safety, security and general well-being. This disease has become a normative part of human life throughout the world.
The first part of the struggle against the murderous depredation of this disease was to protect personal life through restrictive health injunctions and protocols; the worst possibly being human isolation and masks that hid our sorrows and lamentations through thin veils. We suffered that humiliation with grace and I believe as a nation we did a great job.
Now the vaccines are here, ushering us into the second phase of this war against the plague; and we are asking ourselves, is this science-driven fight against Covid-19 spell the end of pandemic anxiety? Is the health nightmare coming to an end? What happy lives lie ahead? Is this the time for celebration or caution? As the Non State Actors, we have being struggling with these questions for months.
We have published our thoughts and feelings, and our research reviews and thorough reading of both the local and international impacts of this rampaging viral invasion in local newspapers and social media platforms.
More significantly, we have successfully organised workshops about the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy and the last workshop invited a panel of health experts, professionals, and public administers to advance this social dialogue as part of our commitment to the tripartite engagement we enjoy working with Government of Botswana, Civil Society and Development partners. These workshops are virtual and open to all Batswana, foreign diplomatic missions based in Gaborone, UN agencies located in Gaborone and international academic researchers and professional health experts and specialists.
The mark of Covid-19 on our nation is a painful one, a tragedy shared by the entire human race, but still a contextually painful experience. Our response is fraught with grave difficulties; limited resources, limited time, and the urgency to not only save lives but also avert economic ruin and a bleak future for all who survive. Several vaccines are already in the market.
Parts of the world are already doing the best they can to trunk the pestilential march of this disease by rolling out mass-vaccinations campaigns that promise to evict this health menace and nightmare from their public lives. Botswana, like much of Africa, is still up in the disreputable, and, unenviable, preventative social melee of masked interactions, metered distances, contactless commerce.
We remain very much at the mercy of a marauding virus that daily runs amuck with earth shattering implications for the economy and human lives. And the battle against both infections and transmissions is proving to be difficult, in terms of finance, institutional capacities and resource mobilization. How are we prepared as government, and as citizens, to embrace the impending mass-vaccinations? What are the chances of us succeeding at this last-ditch effort to defeat the virus? What are the most pressing obstacles?
Does the work of vaccines spell an end to the pandemic anxieties?
Our panellists addressed the current state of mass-vaccination preparedness at the Botswana national level. What resources are available? What are the financial, institutional and administrative operational challenges (costs and supply chains, delivery, distribution, administering the vaccine on time, surveillance and security of vaccines?) What is being done to overcome them, or what can be done to overcome them? What do public assessments of preparedness tell us at the local community levels? How strong is the political will and direction? How long can we expect the whole exercise to last? At what point should we start seeing tangible results of the mass-vaccination campaign?
They also addressed the challenges of the anticipated emerging Vaccinated Society. How to fight the myths of vaccines and the superstitions about histories of human immunizations? What exactly is being done to grow robust local confidence in the science of vaccinations and the vaccines themselves? More significantly, how to square these campaigns vis-vis personal rights, moral/religious obligations?
What messages are being sent out in these regards and how are Batswana responding? What about issues of justice and equality? Will we get the necessary vaccines to everyone who wants them? What is being done to ensure no deserving person is left behind?
They also addressed issues of health data. To accomplish this mass-vaccination campaign and do everything right we need accurate and complete data. Poor data already makes it very hard to just cope with the disease. What is being done to improve data for the mass-vaccination campaign? How is this data being collected, aggregated and prepared for real life situation/applications throughout Botswana in the coming campaign?
We know in America, for example, general reporting and treatment of health data at the beginning of vaccinations was so poor, so chaotic and so scattered mainstream newspapers like The Atlantic, Washington Post and the New York Times had to step in, working very closely with civil society organizations, to rescue the situation. What data-related issues are still problematic in Botswana?
To be specific, what kind of Covid-19 data is being taken now to ready the whole country for an effective and efficient mass-vaccination program?
Batswana must be made aware that the end part of vaccination will just mark the beginning of a long journey to health recovery and national redemption; that in many ways Covid-19 vaccination is just another step toward the many efforts in abeyance to fight this health pandemic, the road ahead is still long and painful.
For this purpose, and to highlight the significance of this observation we tasked our panellists with the arduous imperative of analysing the impact of mass-vaccination on society and the economy alongside the pressing issues of post-Covid-19 national health surveillance and rehabilitation programs.
Research suggests the aftermath of Covid-19 vaccination is going to be just as difficult and uncertain world as the present reality in many ways, and that caution should prevail over celebration, at least for a long time. The disease itself is projected to linger around for some time after all these mass-vaccination campaigns unless an effort is made to vaccinate everyone to the last reported case, every nation succeeds beyond herd immunity, and cure is found for Covid-19 disease. Many people are going to continue in need of medications, psychological and psychiatric services and therapy.
Is Botswana ready for this long holdout? If not, what path should we take going into the future? The Second concern is , are we going to have a single, trusted national agency charged with the mandate to set standards for our national health data system, now that we know how real bad pandemics can be, and the value of data in quickly responding to them and mitigating impact? Finally, what is being done to curate a short history of this pandemic? A national museum of health and medicine or a Public Health Institute in Botswana is overdue.
If we are to create strong sets of data policies and data quality standards for fighting future health pandemics it is critical that they find ideological and moral foundations in the artistic imagery and photography of the present human experience…context is essential to fighting such diseases, and to be prepared we must learn from every tragic health incident.
Our panellists answered most of these questions with distinguished intellectual clarity. We wish Batswana to join us in our second Mass-vaccination workshop.
Today is International Women’s Day – it’s a moment to think about how much better our news diet could be if inequities were eliminated. In 1995, when the curtains fell in one of the largest meetings that have ever brought women together to discuss women in development, it was noted that women and media remain key to development.
Twenty-six years later, the relevant “Article J” of the Beijing Platform for Action, remains unfulfilled. Its two strategic objectives with regard to Women and Media have not been met. They are Increase the participation and access of women to expression and decision-making in and through the media and new technologies of communication
Promote a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media.
Today, as we mark International Women’s Day, it’s an indictment on both media owners and civil society that women remain on the periphery of news-making. They cannot claim equal space in either the structures of newsrooms or in the content produced, be that as sources of news or as the subjects of reports. Indeed, the latest figures from WAN-IFRA’s Women in News Programme show just one in five voices in news belong to women*, be they as sources, as the author or as the main character of the news report.
Some progress was evident several years back, with stand-out women being named as chief executive officers, editors in chief, managing editors and executive editors. But these gains appear short lived in most media organisations. Excitement has turned to frustration as one-step forward has been replaced with three steps backwards. In Africa, the problem is acute. The decision-making tables of media organisations remain deprived of women and where there are women, they are surrounded by men.
Few women have followed in the footsteps of Esther Kamweru, the first woman managing editor in Kenya, and indeed sub-Saharan Africa. Today’s standout women editors include Pamela Makotsi-Sittoni (Nation Media Group, Kenya), Barbara Kaija (New Vision, Uganda), Mary Mbewe (Daily Nation, Zambia), Margaret Vuchiri (The Monitor, Uganda), Joyce Shebe (Clouds, Tanzania), Tryphinah Dongwana (Weekend Post, Botswana), Joyce Mhaville (Independent Television -ITV, Tanzania) and Tuma Abdallah (Standard Newspapers,Tanzania). But they remain an exception.
The lack of balance between women and men at the table of decision making has a rollback effect on the content that is produced. A table dominated by men typically makes decisions that benefit men.
So today, International Women’s Day is a grim reminder that things are not rosy in the news business. Achieving gender balance in news and in the structure of media organisations remains a challenge. Unmet, it sees more than half of the population in our countries suffer the consequences of bias, discrimination and sexism.
The business of ignoring the other half of the population can no longer be treated as normal. It’s time that media leaders grasp the challenge, not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it also makes a whole lot of business sense: start covering women, give them space and a voice in news-making and propel them to all levels of decision making within your organisation.
We can no longer afford to imagine that it’s only men who make and sell the news and bring in the shillings to fund the media business. Women too are worthy newsmakers. In all of our societies, there are women holding decision making positions and who are now experts in once male-only domains such as engineers, doctors, scientists and researchers.
They can be deliberately picked out to share their perspectives and expertise and bring balance to the profile of experts quoted on our news pages. Media is the prism through which society sees itself and women are an untapped audience. So, as we celebrate International Women’s Day, let us embrace diversity, which yields better news content and business products, and in so doing eliminate sexism. We know that actions and attitudes that discriminate against people based on their gender is bad for business.
As media, the challenge is ours. We need to consciously embrace and reach the commitments made 26 years ago when the Beijing Platform for Action was signed globally. As the news consuming public, you have a role to play too. Hold your news organization to account and make sure they deliver balanced news that reflects the voices of all of society.
Jane Godia is a gender development and media expert who serves as the Africa Director of Women in News programme. WOMEN IN NEWS is WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org
The eve of International Women’s Day presents an opportunity for us to think about gender equality and the long and often frustrating march toward societies that are truly equal.
As media, we are uniquely placed to drive forward this reflection and discussion. But while focusing on the challenges of gender in society, we owe it to our staff and the communities we serve to also take a hard look at the obstacles within our own organisations.
I’m talking specifically about the scourge of sexual harassment. It’s likely to have happened in your newsroom. It has likely happened to a member of your team. It happens to all genders but is disproportionately directed at women. It happens in every industry, regardless of country, culture or context. This is because sexual harassment is driven by power, not sex. Wherever you have imbalances in power, you have individuals who are at risk of sexual harassment, and those who abuse this power.
I’ve been sexually harassed. The many journalists and editors, friends and family members who I have spoken to over the years on this subject have also been harassed. Yet it is still hard for leaders to recognize that this could be happening within their newsrooms and boardrooms. Why does it continue to be such a taboo?
Counting the cost of sexual harassment
Sexual harassment is, simply put, bad for business. It can harm your corporate reputation. It is a drain on the productivity of staff and managers. Maintaining and building trust in your brand is an absolute imperative for media organisations globally. If and when a case gets out of control or is badly handled – this can directly impact your bottom line.
It is for this reason that WAN-IFRA Women in News has put eliminating sexual harassment as a top priority in our work around gender equality in the media sector. This might seem at odds with the current climate where social interactions are fewer and remote work scenarios are in place in many newsrooms and businesses. But one only needs to tune into the news to know that the abuse of power, manifested as verbal, physical or online harassment, is alive and well.
Preliminary results from an ongoing Women in News research study into the issue of sexual harassment polling hundreds of journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia indicate that more than 1 in 3 women media professionals have been physically harassed, and just under 50% have been verbally harassed. Just over 15% of men in African newsrooms reported being physically harassed, and slightly less than 1 in 4 reports being verbally harassed. The numbers for male media professionals in Southeast Asia are slightly higher than a quarter on both forms of harassment.
The first step in confronting sexual harassment is to talk about it. We need to strip away the stigma and discomfort around having open conversations about what sexual harassment is and isn’t. Media managers, it is entirely in your power to create dynamics in your own teams that are free from sexual harassment.
Publishers and CEOs, you set the organisational culture in your media company.
By being vocal in recognising that it happens everywhere, and communicating to your employees that you will not tolerate sexual harassment of any kind, you send a powerful message to your teams, and publicly. With these actions, you will help us overcome the legacy of silence around this topic, and in doing so take an important first step to create media environments that truly embrace equality.
Melanie Walker is Executive Director of Media Development of the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). She is a creator of Women in News, WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org