It never amazes me to see how our leaders take Batswana for granted without any shadow of shame or remorse. For many years Batswana have accepted any word from government as gospel truth. It seems the government has used this as a license to legitimise peddling of untruths to the nation.
We can no longer accept government word as gospel truth, it never was. If we continue to do this, all of us, will at the end be guilty of taking this great country down the road to self destruction. We must be resolute and stop turning a blind eye when our resources are being grossly mismanaged by a leadership that has become viciously manipulative and devoid of all honesty in its public discourse.
The minister of minerals, energy and water resources and his senior officials have been on national TV and radio repeatedly telling us and the world that climate change was responsible for drying up the Gaborone Dam. They have also been telling us and the world that all is well at Morupule B, that the Morupule B contractor is sorting out few teething problems with boilers and soon we will be getting our 600 mega watts from that plant. This untruth has been peddled relentlessly since 2012.
Increasingly though, everyone except perhaps the government is feeling the pinch and is aware that Morupule B is not performing and it is unlikely in the short term to perform to expectations. The government and its senior officials, however, seem to be living in another planet where for them shortage of power is not a daily debilitating challenge.
The minister and his officials are saying annual rainfall in the catchment area; the greater Gaborone has been declining from an average of 500 mm to 300 mm due to climate change. This cannot be further from the truth. Not only is talking of such marked drop in rain fall the height of dishonesty, it is also mischievous and foolhardy to attribute it to climate change. I will show you why the government is not telling the truth later. The government is misleading the unsuspecting nation and uses a real life threatening phenomenon to cover its reckless disregard for good governance and accountability.
The world knows the truth about climate change and its impacts. Drying of the Gaborone Dam even by any stretch of imagination cannot be said to be due to climate change. The drying of the dam like I have said before in another submission is due to the government reckless and dangerous disregard for our delicate environment and our future generations.
The government has over time shamefully allowed 200 small dams to be built by their powerful friends on the rivers that discharge into the Gaborone dam. The government continues to fail to explain how and why these dams where built in the first place. The government fails to tell the nation, what the total capacity of these dams is and what the impact on the flow to the Gaborone Dam is.
The government will not tell the nation how much water is lost in these dams due to evaporative losses and seepage. The government will not show the nation the environmental studies done before these dams where constructed. The government is simply failing to account and to take responsibility. In their desperate attempts to further mislead Batswana recently they have said the 200 dams are silt traps, meant to prevent silting on the Gaborone dam. What hogwash!
In addition, the government has shamefully allowed the construction industry to build Gaborone and the greater Gaborone infrastructures using sand mined from these same rivers literally and inadvertently ‘draining life’ out of these rivers. The government is on record, saying, ‘there is nothing they can do to stop sand mining as they need the country developed by mining these rivers’, this was recently said by a senior government official on BTV.
How shameful coming from a government that is supposed to be so caring and passionate about protection of the environment to the extent that our president would rather attend an international environmental meeting than to attend an international or even a regional leadership conference where international relations and businesses are discussed. We all want development, but these developments must be done sustainably without jeopardising the future of this great nation.
There are a number of quarries that can provide all the building materials requirements around the country. By allowing river sand mining, government is actually stifling the growth of the quarrying industry and by extension stifling national development and economic diversification. Our government has become irresponsible beyond measure and this must be strongly condemned by all who care for this country.
To add salt to a festering wound, government through its weak monitoring and enforcement apparatus has inadvertently allowed unscrupulous business interests to dump industrial waste in these same rivers, further expediting the ‘death’ of these rivers.
We ought to be ashamed as a country that we have allowed these environmental atrocities to continue for so long unchallenged. We must now remove the blinkers to see evil and remove the ear plugs to hear evil and with all our might take action to redress the ills we have allowed to visit our country.
The three evils stated above have unfortunately conspired to dry up the Gaborone Dam, resulting in the massive water rationing that we have to endure three times a week in Gaborone. Minister, climate change is not responsible for this mess! The government must simply accept the blame, own up and come up with a solid remedial action plan to redress these evils.
The man made disaster, if it is allowed to continue will dry more dams in the future. In the next few years those dams in the north that are now providing water to almost the whole country, which dams government is also unwisely trying to use for irrigated agricultural purposes will also dry up and we shall without shame blame ‘climate change’. It is time for us Batswana to wake up and be real before it is too late.
I think it is only the government, the minister and his officials that believe all is well at Morupule B. The whole world knows that Morupule B is a disaster and it will never reach its maximum capacity of 600 megawatts. The whole world knows that if we do not stop Morupule B now and re build it, we are waiting for a time bomb that will explode very soon possibly resulting in major infrastructural damages including possible loss of life. Our government would rather than own up, wait to see whether indeed the bomb is real.
When this disaster strikes, the government will blame ‘climate change’ or no, this time the poor Chinese contractor will carry the blame; a contractor that was knowingly given a job by our government that they had no capacity to implement; a contractor that was given a green field and never supervised by government during the construction phase; a contractor who has been given P600 million vat exemption by our government; a contractor that is now the reason we are having load shedding and living in the dark after spending over P15 billion of our hard earned money on this plant believing that the plant will provide power self sufficiency by 2012. Yes disasters and delusions of our time!!
The government has forgotten that they told Batswana and the world that by 2012, Botswana will be self sufficient in power supply, that Botswana will no longer need any power from ESKOM by 2012. The same government is now telling Botswana and the world that by 2019 we will be self sufficient in power supply. They are not even saying why this was not achieved in 2012 as promised. They take us for fools. We must not accept this anymore?
Climate change is a serious phenomenon which should not be trivilised by anybody especially our government, who should know better. Climate change requires international response to cap global warming by reducing global carbon emissions by increasingly using renewable energy sources, like solar, bio mass and other such technologies that are friendly to the environment.
We have heard and seen mind boggling evidence of climate change, glaciers melting down due to increasing temperatures, sea levels changing, unexplained devastating changes in the weather resulting in loss of life and massive destruction of property etc, but we will be lying if we say we have seen evidence of climate change in Botswana. We have since the ‘beginning of time’ always experienced erratic rainfall patterns and high temperatures.
It is not true from the annual rainfall statistics that rainfall has dropped from an average of 500 mm to 300mm in the greater Gaborone. We cannot take isolated rainfall figures and making sweeping statements about climate change. This is wrong and irresponsible.
The above graph has been constructed from raw rainfall data from the department of meteorology. This is just one typical example of annual rainfall since 1980 in Gaborone and the pattern is similar around Gaborone and indeed around the country.
This is typical cyclic nature of rainfall patterns in Botswana since time immemorial. When we design our dams and when we ‘plan’ our plans, we must base these on our natural rainfall pattern reality. This pattern has nothing to do with climate change. I am sure if you go back another 34 years you will find the same pattern.
Let us all stand up and challenge our leaders. They must not take us for granted any more. They must tell us the truth so that we can help them move this country forward.
Bernard Busani E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org: Cell: 71751440
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” Carl Sagan
Corruption is a heavy price to pay. The clean ones pay and suffer at the mercy of people who cannot have enough. They always want to eat and eat so selfishly like a bunch of ugly masked shrews. I hope God forgives me for ridiculing his creatures, but that mammal is so greedy. But corruption is not the new kid on the block, because it has always been everywhere.
This of course begs the question, why that is so? The common answer was and still is – abuse and misuse of power by those in power and weak institutions, disempowered to control the leaders. In 1996, the then President of The World Bank, James D. Wolfensohn named the ‘C-Word’ for the first time during an annual meeting of the Bretton Woods Institutions. A global fight against corruption started. Transparency International began its work. Internal and external audits mushroomed; commissions of inquiry followed and ever convoluted public tender procedures have become a bureaucratic nightmare to the private sector, trying to fight red tape.
The result is sobering corruption today is worse than it was 25 years ago. There is no denying that strong institutions help, but how does it come that in the annual Transparency International Ranking the same group of countries tend to be on the top while another group of countries, many African among them, tend to be on the bottom? Before one jumps to simple and seductive conclusions let us step back a moment.
Wolfensohn called corruption a cancer that destroys economies like a cancer destroys a body. A cancer is, simplified, good cells in a body gone bad, taking control of more and more good cells until the entire body is contaminated and eventually dies. So, let us look at the good cells of society first: they are family ties, clan and tribe affiliation, group cohesion, loyalty, empathy, reciprocity.
Most ordinary people like the reader of these lines or myself would claim to share such values. Once we ordinary people must make decisions, these good cells kick in: why should I hire a Mrs. Unknown, if I can hire my niece whose strengths and weaknesses I know? If I hire the niece, she will owe me and support my objectives.
Why should I purchase office furniture from that unknown company if I know that my friend’s business has good quality stuff? If I buy from him, he will make an extra effort to deliver his best and provide quality after sales service? So, why go through a convoluted tender process with uncertain outcome? In the unlikely case my friend does not perform as expected, I have many informal means to make him deliver, rather than going through a lengthy legal proceeding?
This sounds like common sense and natural and our private lives do work mostly that way and mostly quite well.
The problem is scale. Scale of power, scale of potential gains, scale of temptations, scale of risk. And who among us could throw the first stone were we in positions of power and claim not to succumb to the temptations of scale? Like in a body, cancer cells start growing out of proportion.
So, before we call out for new leaders – experience shows they are rarely better than the old ones – we need to look at ourselves first. But how easy is that? If I were the niece who gets the job through nepotism, why should I be overly critical? If I got a big furniture contract from a friend, why should I spill the beans? What right do I have to assume that, if I were a president or a minister or a corporate chief procurement officer I would not be tempted?
This is where we need to learn. What is useful, quick, efficient, and effective within a family or within a clan or a small community can become counterproductive and costly and destructive at larger corporate or national scale. Our empathy with small scale reciprocity easily permeates into complacency and complicity with large scale corruption and into an acquiescence with weak institutions to control it.
Our institutions can only be as strong as we wish them to be.
I was probably around ten years old and have always been that keen enthusiastic child that also liked to sing the favourite line of, ‘the world will become a better place.’ I would literally stand in front of a mirror and use my mom’s torch as a mic and sing along Michael Jackson’s hit song, ‘We are the world.’
Despite my horrible voice, I still believed in the message. Few years later, my annoyance towards the world’s corrupt system wonders whether I was just too naïve. Few years later and I am still in doubt so as to whether I should go on blabbing that same old boring line. ‘The world is going to be a better place.’ The question is, when?
The answer is – as always: now.
This is pessimistic if not fatalistic – I challenge Sagan’s outlook with a paraphrased adage of unknown origin: Some people can be bamboozled all of the time, all people can be bamboozled some of the time, but never will all people be bamboozled all of the time.
We, the people are the only ones who can heal society from the cancer of corruption. We need to understand the temptation of scale and address it. We need to stop seeing ourselves just a victim of a disease that sleeps in all of us. We need to give power to the institutions that we have put in place to control corruption: parliaments, separation of power, the press, the ballot box. And sometimes we need to say as a niece – no, I do not want that job as a favour, I want it because I have proven to be better than other contenders.
It is going to be a struggle, because it will mean sacrifices, but sacrifices that we have chosen, not those imposed on us.
Let us start today.
*Bokani Lisa Motsu is a student at University of Botswana
Parliament, the second arm of State through its parliamentary committees are one of Botswana’s most powerful mechanisms to ensure that government is held accountable at all times. The Accounting Officers are mostly Permanent Secretaries across government Ministries and Chief Executive Officers, Director Generals, Managing Directors of parastatals, state owned enterprises and Civil Society.
So parliament plays its oversight authority via the legislators sitting on a parliamentary committee and Accounting Officers sitting in the hot chair. When left with no proper checks and balances, the Executive is prone to abuse the arrangement and so systematic oversight of the executive is usually carried out by parliamentary committees. They track the work of various government departments and ministries, and conduct scrutiny into important aspects of their policy, direction and administration.
It is not rocket science that effective oversight requires that committees be totally independent and able to set their own agendas and have the power to summon ministers and top civil servants to appear and answer questions. Naturally, Accounting Officers are the highest ranking officials in the government hierarchy apart from cabinet Ministers and as such wield much power and influence in the performance of government. To illustrate further, government performance is largely owed to the strategic and policy direction of top technocrats in various Ministries.
It is disheartening to point out that the recent parliament committees — as has been the case all over the years — has laid bare the incompetency, inadequacy and ineptitude of people bestowed with great responsibilities in public offices. To say that they are ineffective and inefficient sounds as an understatement. Some appear useless and hopeless when it comes to running the government despite the huge responsibility they possess.
If we were uncertain about the degree at which the Accounting Officers are incompetent, the ongoing parliament committees provide a glaring answer. It is not an exaggeration to say that ordinary people on the streets have been held ransom by these technocrats who enjoy their air conditioned offices and relish being chauffeured around in luxurious BX SUV’s while the rest of the citizenry continue to suffer. Because of such high life the Accounting Officers seem to have, with time, they have gotten out of touch with the people they are supposed to serve.
An example; when appearing before the recent Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Office of the President Permanent Secretary, Thuso Ramodimoosi, looked reluctant to admit misuse of public funds. Although it is clear funds were misused, he looked unbothered when committee members grilled him over the P80 million Orapa House building that has since morphed into a white elephant for close to 10 successive years. To him, it seems it did not matter much and PAC members were worried for nothing.
On a separate day, another Accounting officer, Director of Public Service Management (DPSM), Naledi Mosalakatane, was not shy to reveal to PAC upon cross-examination that there exist more than 6 000 vacancies in government. Whatever reasons she gave as an excuse, they were not convincing and the committee looked sceptical too. She was faltering and seemed not to have a sense of urgency over the matter no matter how critical it is to the populace.
Botswana’s unemployment rate hoovers around 18 percent in a country where majority of the population is the youth, and the most affected by unemployment. It is still unclear why DPSM could underplay such a critical matter that may threaten the peace and stability of the country. Accounting Officers clearly appear out of touch with the reality out there – if the PAC examinations are anything to go by.
Ideally the DPSM Director could be dropping the vacancy post digits while sourcing funds and setting timelines for the spaces to be filled as a matter of urgency so that the citizens get employed to feed their families and get out of unemployment and poverty ravaging the country. The country should thank parliamentary committees such as PAC to expose these abnormalities and the behaviour of our leaders when in public office. How can a full Accounting Officer downplay the magnitude of the landless problem in Botswana and fail to come with direct solutions tailor made to provide Batswana with the land they desperately need?
Land is a life and death matter for some citizens, as we would know.
When Bonolo Khumotaka, the Accounting Officer in the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services, whom as a top official probably with a lucrative pay too appears to be lacking sense of urgency as she is failing on her key mandate of working around the clock to award the citizens with land especially those who need it most like the marginalised. If government purports they need P94 billion to service land to address the land crisis what is plan B for government? Are we going to accept it the way it is?
Government should wake up from its slumber and intervene to avoid the 30 years unnecessary waiting period in State land and 13 years in Tribal land. Accounting Officers are custodians of government policy, they should ensure it is effective and serve its purpose. What we have been doing over the years, has proved that it is not effective, and clearly there is a need for change of direction.
His Excellency Dr Mokgweetsi EK Masisi, the President of the Republic of Botswana found it appropriate to invoke Section 17 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Botswana, using the powers vested in him to declare a State of Public Emergency starting from the 2nd April 2020 at midnight.
The constitutional provision under Section 17 (2b) only provided that such a declaration could be up to a maximum of 21 days. His Excellency further invoked Section 93 (1) to convene an extra- ordinary meeting of Parliament to have the opportunity to consult members of parliament on measures that have been put in place to address the spread and transmission of the virus. At this meeting Members of Parliament passed a resolution on the legal instruments and regulations governing the period of the state of emergency, and extended its duration by six (6) months.
The passing of the State of Emergency is considered as a very crucial step in fighting the near apocalyptic potential of the Novel COVID-19 virus. One of the interesting initiatives that was developed and extended to the business community was a 3-month wage subsidy that came with a condition that no businesses would retrench for the duration of the State of Public Emergency. This has potentially saved many people’s jobs as most companies would have been extremely quick to reduce expenses by downsizing. Self-preservation as some would call it.
Most organisations would have tried to reduce costs by letting go of people, retreated and tried their best to live long enough to fight another day. In my view there is silver lining that we need to look at and consider. The fact that organisations are not allowed to retrench has forced certain companies to look at the people with a long-term view.
Most leaders have probably had to wonder how they are going to ensure that their people are resilient. Do they have team members who innovate and add value to the organisation during these testing times? Do they even have resilient people or are they just waiting for the inevitable end? Can they really train people and make them resilient? How can your team members be part of your recovery plan? What can they do to avoid losing the capabilities they need to operate meaningfully for the duration of the State of Public Emergency and beyond?
The above questions have forced companies to reimagine the future of work. The truth is that no organisation can operate to its full potential without resilient people. In the normal business cycle, new teams come on board; new business streams open, operations or production sites launch or close; new markets develop, and technology is introduced. All of this provides fresh opportunities – and risks.
The best analogy I have seen of people-focused resilience planning reframes employees as your organisation’s immune system, ready and prepared to anticipate risks and ensure they can tackle challenges, fend off illness and bounce back more quickly. So, how do you supercharge your organizational immune system to become resilient?
COVID-19 has helped many organisations realize they were not as prepared as they believed themselves to be. Now is the time to take stock and reset for the future. All the strategies and plans prior to COVID-19 arriving in Botswana need to be thrown out of the window and you need to develop a new plan today. There is no room for tweaking or reframing. Botswana has been disrupted and we need to accept and embrace the change. What we initially anticipated as a disease that would take a short term is turning out to be something we are going to have to live with for a much longer time. It is going to be a marathon and therefore businesses need to have a plan to complete this marathon.
Start planning. Planning for change can help reduce employee stress, anxiety, and overall fear, boosting the confidence of staff and stakeholders. Think about conducting and then regularly refreshing a strategic business impact analysis, look at your employee engagement scores, dig into your customer metrics and explore the way people work alongside your behaviours and culture. This research will help to identify what you really want to protect, the risks that you need to plan for and what you need to survive during disruption. Don’t forget to ask your team members for their input. In many cases they are closest to critical business areas and already have ideas to make processes and systems more robust.
Revisit your organisational purpose. Purpose, values and principles are powerful tools. By putting your organisation’s purpose and values front and center, you provide clear decision-making guidelines for yourself and your organisation. There are very tough and interesting decisions to make which have to be made fast; so having guiding principles on which the business believes in will help and assist all decision makers with sanity checking the choices that are in front of them. One noticeable characteristic of companies that adapt well during change is that they have a strong sense of identity. Leaders and employees have a shared sense of purpose and a common performance culture; they know what the company stands for beyond shareholder value and how to get things done right.
Revisit your purpose and values. Understand if they have been internalised and are proving useful. If so, find ways to increase their use. If not, adapt them as necessities, to help inspire and guide people while immunizing yourself against future disruption. Design your employee experience. The most resilient, adaptive and high performing companies are made up of people who know each other, like each other, and support each other.
Adaptability requires us to teach other, speak up and discuss problems, and have a collective sense of belonging. Listening to your team members is a powerful and disruptive thing to do. It has the potential to transform the way you manage your organisation. Enlisting employees to help shape employee experience, motivates better performance, increases employee retention and helps you spot issues and risks sooner. More importantly, it gives employees a voice so you can get active and constructive suggestions to make your business more robust by adopting an inclusive approach.
Leaders need to show they care. If you want to build resilience, you must build on a basis of trust. And this means leaders should listen, care, and respond. It’s time to build the entire business model around trust and empathy. Many of the employees will be working under extreme pressure due to the looming question around what will happen when companies have to retrench. As a leader of a company transparency and open communication are the most critical aspects that need to be illustrated.
Take your team member into confidence because if you do have to go through the dreaded excise of retrenchment you have to remember that those people the company retains will judge you based on the process you follow. If you illustrate that the business or organization has no regard for loyalty and commitment, they will never commit to the long-term plans of the organisation which will leave you worse off in the end. Its an absolutely delicate balance but it must all be done in good faith. Hopefully, your organization will avoid this!
This is the best time to revisit your identify and train your people to encourage qualities that build strong, empathetic leadership; self-awareness and control, communication, kindness and psychological safety. Resilience is the glue that binds functional silos and integrates partners, improves communications, helps you prepare, listen and understand. Most importantly, people-focused resilience helps individuals and teams to think collectively and with empathy – helping you respond and recover faster.
Article written by Thabo Majola, a brand communications expert with a wealth of experience in the field and is Managing Director of Incepta Communications.