The Law Society of Botswana (LSB) has accused President Ian Khama Seretse Khama of manipulating the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) by making it recommend the names he wants for appointment of judges.
In court papers filed before the Gaborone High court, the LSB Executive Secretary, Tebogo Moipolai says in so doing the President and the JSC are in contravention of the law that governs the appointment of judges.
“The JSC and the President on their own version, have consistently breached section 103(4) in that the JSC has allowed the President to direct and control it where he refuses to take its advice, causing it to reconvene with a view to recommending the name which the President and not the JSC likes,” Moipolai pointed out.
Moipolai maintains that the Pres8ident does not have any discretion under the provisions of the constitution to decline appointment on criteria that is not considered by the JSC and that there is no room for the President to refuse an appointment on any basis because he is not empowered to act outside the advice of the JSC.
“The second respondent’s argument that section 96(2) has no application where the President declines to appoint a judge recommended by the JSC, is inimical to the doctrine of the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers,” Moipolai contended.
The matter which is yet to be heard in open court before the High court is about the recent decision by President Khama to refuse to appoint a local attorney, Omphemetse Motumise as the judge of the High court. However the case is centred around the interpretation of section 96(2) of the constitution which deals with the extent of the President’s powers in as far as the appointment of judges is concerned.
“In addition to the order reviewing the order and setting aside of the first respondent’s (Khama) decision not to appoint the second applicant (Motumise), the applicants seek further declaratory relief in relation to the first respondent’s powers in terms of section 96(2) of the constitution and the conduct of the JSC in matters relating to the appointment of judges,” Moipolai further noted.
Although Khama has also filed papers detailing his reasons for his actions, the LSB maintains that the information he had brought forward is not enough as he had not explained the real reasons he rejected Motumise.
The LSB is of the view that the President’s contention seeks to undermine the careful balancing of powers enshrined in the constitution.
“The decision of the first respondent is liable to review under the principles of legality and rationally which requires that a decision maker exercise his powers lawfully, rationally and in good faith and does not exceed the powers conferred on him or her by law.
The applicant’s challenge the decision as irrational on the ground that it is ultra vires the powers conferred upon the first respondent by section 96(2) of the constitution,” Moipolai filed his contention against Khama’s view that his decision is not reviewable by the court of law.
Moipolai maintains that Section 127(10) of the Constitution quite clearly gives the court the power to review the exercise of the President’s power, irrespective of whether the power is a constitutional, executive, discretionary or prerogative one.
He further contends that the right of individuals to an independent and impartial judiciary is entrenched as a fundamental right in section 10(9) of the constitution and that where a public functionary, including the President, exercises such power, irrespective of whether one calls as an executive power or a prerogative, it is reviewable.
He further stated that the President’s reasons for rejecting candidates are likely to have a chilling effect on potential candidates to the extent that it suggests that the President maintains a system of surveillance to gather embarrassing information about citizens of a certain socio-political orientation, which is used to block their judicial appointment.
Khama had stated in the court papers that some of the considerations he takes when appointing judges include matters of national security, the socio-political situation in Botswana, public perceptions of the relevant candidate and the judiciary and questions of policy.
“The applicants submit that the President cannot on the advice of Cabinet and “his own advisors” when the Constitution itself provides that he rely on the JSC advice and no other. The President is not bound to solicit the advice of any other person. In this case his decision falls to be reviewed and set aside because he took into account irrelevant considerations,” Moipolai pointed out.
Nonetheless, the JSC has filed papers in support of the President’s decision and maintains that it decisions are confidential.
The JSC is a body that approve judges from appointment subject to a formal tradition of appointment by the Presi8dent. The role of the JSC in the appointment process is so vital that without the JSC processes, advice and recommendation, the President will not be able to consider and appoint any candidate.
Thus the only criteria for appointment is that followed by the JSC and appointment can only be made according to the advice of the JSC not any other advice, but the President maintains he has the right to refuse a name and cause the JSC to recommend another name for appointment as it happened in the Motumise case.
The JSC however had argued that the current practices and procedures of the JSC and the President have served the country well. However the LSB is adamant on its opposition of this assertion and submitted before court that the JSC has not substantiated its claim that the current appointment practices have served the country well as there is no empirical evidence to support the assertion.
“JSC was set up to protect and promote the judicial independence of judges whose appointment and discipline might otherwise be subjected to political manipulation. The complete secrecy in relation to the appointment processes of the JSC is unreasonable and unjustified and not in line with the processes of other jurisdictions such as Kenya, South Africa, the United States and more recently Zimabwe which held its first public interviews for candidates for judicial appointment in 2014,” Moipolai added.
Moipolai however maintains that it is not LSB’s intention to prescribe any particular procedure for the JSC, but that they strongly feel that the current practice of the JSC does not accord with the principles of transparency and openness that is required and that can be justifiable in a democratic country.
As a response to avert vulture poisoning currently going on in Botswana and KAZA region, Birdlife Botswana has collaborated with three other partners (BirdWatch Zambia, BirdLife International & Birdlife Zimbabwe) to tackle wildlife poisoning which by extension negatively affect vulture populations.
The Director of Birdlife Botswana, Motshereganyi Virat Kootshositse has revealed in an interview that the project which is funded by European Union’s main goal is to reduce poisoning related vultures’ death and consequently other wildlife species death within the KAZA region.
He highlighted that Chobe district in Botswana has been selected as a pilot site as it has experienced rampant incidents of vulture poisoning for the past few months. In August this year at least 50 endangered white backed vultures were reported dead at Chobe National Park, Botswana after feeding on a buffalo carcass laced with poison. In November this year again 43 white backed vultures were found dead and two alive after feeding on a zebra suspected to have poisoned. Other selected pilots’ sites are Kafue in Zambia and Hwange in Zimbabwe.
Kootshositse further explained they have established a national and regional Wildlife Poisoning Committee. He added that as for the national committee they have engaged various departments such as Crop Productions, Agro Chemicals, Department of Veterinary Services, Department of Wildlife and National Parks and other NGOs such as Raptors Botswana to come together and find a long-lasting solution to address wildlife poisoning in Botswana. ‘Let’s have a strategy or a plan together to tackle wildlife poisoning,’ he stated
He also decried that there is gap in the availability of data about vulture poisoning or wildlife in general. ‘If we have a central point for data, it will help in terms of reporting and advocacy’, he stated
He added that the regional committee comprises of law enforcement officers such as BDF and Botswana police, village leadership such as Village Development Committee and Kgosi. ‘We need to join hand together and protect the wildlife we have as this will increase our profile for conservation and this alone enhances our visitation and boost our local economy,’ he noted
Kootshositse noted that Birdlife together with DWNP also addressed series of meeting in some villages in the Chobe region recently. The purpose of kgotla meetings was to raise awareness on the conservation and protection of vultures in Chobe West communities.
‘After realizing that vulture poisoning in the Chobe areas become frequent, we realise that we need to do something about it. ‘We did a public awareness by addressing several kgotla meetings in some villages in the Chobe west,’ he stated
He noted that next year they are going to have another round of consultations around the Chobe areas and the approach is to engage the community into planning process. ‘Residents should be part of the plan of actions and we are working with farmers committee in the areas to address vulture poisoning in the area, ‘he added
He added that they have found out that some common reasons for poisoning wildlife are farmers targeting predators such as lions in retaliation to killing of their livestock. Another common incident cross border poaching in the Chobe area as poachers will kills an elephant and poison its carcass targeting vultures because of their aerial circling alerting authorities about poaching activities.
Kootshositse noted that in the last cases it was disheartening the incidents occurred three months apart. He added that for the first time they found that some of the body parts of some vultures were missing. He added harvesting of body parts of vultures is not a common practice in Botswana, although it is used in some parts of Africa. ‘We suspect that someone took advantage of the availability of carcasses and started harvesting their body parts,’
The music industry is at a point where artists are jostling for space because there are so many aspirants trying to get their big break, thus creating stiff competition.
In the music business it’s about talent and positioning. You need to be at the right place at the right time with the right people around you to propel you forward.
Against all odds, Everton Mlalazi has managed to takeover the gospel scene effortlessly.
To him, it’s more than just a breakthrough to stardom, but a passion as well as mission directly appointed by the Lord.
Within a short space of 2 years after having decided to persue a solo career, Mlalazi has already made it into international music scene, with his music receiving considerable play on several gospel television and radio stations in Botswana including other regional stations like Trace Africa, One Gospel, Metro FM in South Africa, Hope FM in Kenya and literally all broadcast stations in Zimbabwe.
It doesn’t only stop there, as the musician has already been nominated 2 times and 2 awards which are Bulawayo Arts Awards (BAA) best Male artists 2022, StarFM listerners Choice Award, Best Newcomer 2021 and ZIMA Best Contemporary Gospel 2022, MLA awards Best Male artist & Best Gospel Artist 2022.
Everton’s inspiration stems from his ultimate passion and desire to lead people into Godly ways and it seems it’s only getting started.
The man is a gospel artist to put on your radar.
Minister of Health Dr Edwin Dikoloti says Africa member states call on World Health Organization (WHO) to ensure equitable resource allocation for 2024-2025. Dr Dikoloti was speaking this week at the WHO Executive Board Meeting in Geneva, Switzerland.
He said countries agreed that there is need to address the budget and funding imbalances by increasing the programme budget share of countries and regions to 75% for the next year.
“The proposed budget for 2024-2025 marks an important milestone as it is the first in Programme Budget in which country offices will be allocated more than half of the total budget for the biennium. We highly welcome this approach which will enable the organization to deliver on its mandate while fulfilling the expectations for transparency, efficiency and accountability.”
The Botswana Health Minister commended member states on the extension of the General Programme of Work (GPD 13) and the Secretariat work to monitor the progress towards the triple billion targets, and the health-related SDGs.
“We welcome the Director’s general proposed five priorities which have crystalized into the “five Ps” that are aligned with the GPW 13 extension. Impact can only be achieved through close coordination with, and support to national health authorities. As such, the strengthening of country offices is instrumental, with particular focus on strengthening national health systems and on promoting more equitable access to health services.”
According to Dr Dikoloti, the majority of countries with UHC index that is below the global median are in the WHO Africa region. “For that, we call on the WHO to enhance capacity at the regional and national levels in order to accelerate progress. Currently, the regional office needs both technical and financial support in order to effectively address and support country needs.”