A diamond symbolises an enduring relation relationship, much more like the partnership between the government of Botswana and DeBeers, this was said in the inaugural DeBeers report, “Turning finite resources into enduring opportunity: The economic contribution to Botswana of the Partnership between the Government of the Republic of Botswana and De Beers” which was launched at the conference recently held in Gaborone. The report explores the economic contributions to Botswana of the partnership which has endured for 50 years.
The partnership comprises of four companies, all operating in Botswana. Botswana has a 50/50 joint venture with DeBeers called Debswana, the primary producer of diamonds. Then there is Diamond Trading Company Botswana (DTCB) which is also a 50/50 joint venture, DTCB sorts and values rough diamonds mined by Debswana. There is also DeBeers Global Sightholder Sales, a rough diamond sales arm of DeBeers, which is responsible for selling the bulk of DeBeers global production to its rough diamond customers.
“When De Beers’ geologists first discovered diamonds in Botswana in 1967 – only a year after the country gained its independence – few could have imagined the wealth hidden below ground.
Fewer still could have imagined that these hidden treasures would transform the country so dramatically and that it would, as a consequence, experience one of the world’s longest periods of economic growth,” Philippe Mellier, CEO of DeBeers Group, said in the foreword of the report, later adding on that such partnership between the public and private sectors are not uncommon, but ones that endure for almost 50 years certainly are uncommon.
Mellier said that the success of the partnership is hinged on full commitment between the partners. Botswana committed itself by becoming a minority shareholder in DeBeers by holding 15%, the rest is held by Anglo American. In appreciation and also part of their commitment, DeBeers relocated their multibillion dollar international sales function from London to Gaborone, a move that was seen as a first step towards diamond beneficiation.
Botswana, other than being hailed as a beacon of democracy in Africa has also enjoyed accolades across the world for its prudent use of its most important natural resource, diamonds, to fuel its economic and transform it from the world’s poorest to a middle income country. This was in contrast to other African countries that have abundant natural resources yet failed to use them, earning them the tagline “resource cursed economies” due to instabilities that have plagued such countries.
According to the report, as soon as the diamonds were discovered, a decision was taken to partner with the private sector in developing the diamond resource. “Engaging private capital and expertise was an unusual decision in an era when nationalisation and a preference for state-led development was common in much of Africa,” read part of the report.
It was the uncommon partnership that saw DeBeers bearing all the costs and leveraging on its expertise to develop mines. In the process the capital expenditure stimulated other sectors of the economy such as construction, financial services and transport. The growth of the economy increased development investment and lifted national wealth levels rapidly. As DeBeers provided capital, technology, skills transfer and an effective route to the market, the government provided a stable and supporting environment. “De Beers has also respected and supported the broader developmental aspirations of Botswana, while the Government has granted De Beers long-term access to diamond supply,” the report highlighted.
The report points to a fruitful relationship as the biggest single contributor to the economy has been this partnership. As per stated in the report, partnership revenues of almost US$7 billion in 2014, the partnership directly generated US$4 billion of value to the economy, which was the equivalent of 25 per cent of GDP for the year. When the direct contributions of the Partnership to the economy are combined with the contribution through the supply chain and employee spending, the total economic contribution grows to US$4.4 billion or 27 per cent of Botswana’s GDP in 2014. With taxes, royalties and dividends combined, the total distribution of Partnership revenues to the Government represents a significant proportion of its total revenue raised in 2014.
The revenues have been used to sustain and create employment and skills development. The partnership contributed more than 34,000 jobs in Botswana. Directly, it employed almost 8,000 people in 2014, of whom 96 per cent were Botswana citizens, including almost 85 per cent of management. A further 12,870 jobs in the broader economy were supported through the Partnership’s supply chain contribution. Another 13,400 jobs were supported by the spending of employees of the Partnership and its suppliers’ employees. In total, the Partnership supported one in every 20 jobs in Botswana.
The report heaped praise on Botswana for its stellar use of diamonds to drive the economy. This was attributed to Botswana’s sound macroeconomic policies and its firm belief in democracy, and when all this factors are combined, Botswana flourished both economically and socially as evidenced by the wise use of diamond revenues in long term development of infrastructure and human capital. The report suggests that Botswana’s experience in harnessing its diamond resources can be used in other sectors of the economy to provide a strong foundation for further growth and economic diversification.
From the report, DeBeers is cognisant of challenges besieging Botswana but remains committed in helping its partner sail through those challenges. “Challenges such as unemployment, high levels of income inequality, residual poverty and an over-reliance on diamonds still need to be overcome. Progress is, however, being made. This is particularly true with regards to economic diversification, with the non-mining sector now making up 70 per cent of total value added to GDP compared with less than 50 per cent in 2002. The Partnership can help Botswana to move further down this path,” read the report.
To achieve this, it will involve continued mining operations that maximise the value of every Botswana diamond yet to be mined and sold, as the revenues will provide and support further developmental investment, improve health and education, provide social safety nets and, importantly, support new, more sustainable sectors. Furthermore the partnership will put concerted efforts against threats such as synthetic diamonds and coming up with ways in building global demand for diamonds. DeBeers says it will support and promote Botswana as a global diamond hub, while domestically it will use its mighty power to build linkages to local businesses, as well as to support initiatives outside of diamonds with enterprise development programmes such as Tokafala.
The diamond mining behemoth says the partnership provides a model of how public and private interests can work together in the long term. “The key is to have an aligned vision: in this case, a deep appreciation of diamonds as a finite, luxury product, and a long-term approach to creating value from one of nature’s treasures,” the report further added that the partners will need to stick to this long term vision in order to deliver another 50 years of development. Furthermore, the challenges of transitioning from a diamond led economy should not detract from the success the partnership has had in turning Botswana from of the world’s poorest countries to a thriving economy it is today. “By translating the potential of resources below ground into enduring value above ground, Botswana has succeeded where many others have failed,” stated the report.
This is a question that should seriously exercise the mind of every Botswana citizen and every science researcher, every health worker and every political leader political.
The Covid-19 currently defines our lives and poses a direct threat to every aspect and every part of national safety, security and general well-being. This disease has become a normative part of human life throughout the world.
The first part of the struggle against the murderous depredation of this disease was to protect personal life through restrictive health injunctions and protocols; the worst possibly being human isolation and masks that hid our sorrows and lamentations through thin veils. We suffered that humiliation with grace and I believe as a nation we did a great job.
Now the vaccines are here, ushering us into the second phase of this war against the plague; and we are asking ourselves, is this science-driven fight against Covid-19 spell the end of pandemic anxiety? Is the health nightmare coming to an end? What happy lives lie ahead? Is this the time for celebration or caution? As the Non State Actors, we have being struggling with these questions for months.
We have published our thoughts and feelings, and our research reviews and thorough reading of both the local and international impacts of this rampaging viral invasion in local newspapers and social media platforms.
More significantly, we have successfully organised workshops about the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy and the last workshop invited a panel of health experts, professionals, and public administers to advance this social dialogue as part of our commitment to the tripartite engagement we enjoy working with Government of Botswana, Civil Society and Development partners. These workshops are virtual and open to all Batswana, foreign diplomatic missions based in Gaborone, UN agencies located in Gaborone and international academic researchers and professional health experts and specialists.
The mark of Covid-19 on our nation is a painful one, a tragedy shared by the entire human race, but still a contextually painful experience. Our response is fraught with grave difficulties; limited resources, limited time, and the urgency to not only save lives but also avert economic ruin and a bleak future for all who survive. Several vaccines are already in the market.
Parts of the world are already doing the best they can to trunk the pestilential march of this disease by rolling out mass-vaccinations campaigns that promise to evict this health menace and nightmare from their public lives. Botswana, like much of Africa, is still up in the disreputable, and, unenviable, preventative social melee of masked interactions, metered distances, contactless commerce.
We remain very much at the mercy of a marauding virus that daily runs amuck with earth shattering implications for the economy and human lives. And the battle against both infections and transmissions is proving to be difficult, in terms of finance, institutional capacities and resource mobilization. How are we prepared as government, and as citizens, to embrace the impending mass-vaccinations? What are the chances of us succeeding at this last-ditch effort to defeat the virus? What are the most pressing obstacles?
Does the work of vaccines spell an end to the pandemic anxieties?
Our panellists addressed the current state of mass-vaccination preparedness at the Botswana national level. What resources are available? What are the financial, institutional and administrative operational challenges (costs and supply chains, delivery, distribution, administering the vaccine on time, surveillance and security of vaccines?) What is being done to overcome them, or what can be done to overcome them? What do public assessments of preparedness tell us at the local community levels? How strong is the political will and direction? How long can we expect the whole exercise to last? At what point should we start seeing tangible results of the mass-vaccination campaign?
They also addressed the challenges of the anticipated emerging Vaccinated Society. How to fight the myths of vaccines and the superstitions about histories of human immunizations? What exactly is being done to grow robust local confidence in the science of vaccinations and the vaccines themselves? More significantly, how to square these campaigns vis-vis personal rights, moral/religious obligations?
What messages are being sent out in these regards and how are Batswana responding? What about issues of justice and equality? Will we get the necessary vaccines to everyone who wants them? What is being done to ensure no deserving person is left behind?
They also addressed issues of health data. To accomplish this mass-vaccination campaign and do everything right we need accurate and complete data. Poor data already makes it very hard to just cope with the disease. What is being done to improve data for the mass-vaccination campaign? How is this data being collected, aggregated and prepared for real life situation/applications throughout Botswana in the coming campaign?
We know in America, for example, general reporting and treatment of health data at the beginning of vaccinations was so poor, so chaotic and so scattered mainstream newspapers like The Atlantic, Washington Post and the New York Times had to step in, working very closely with civil society organizations, to rescue the situation. What data-related issues are still problematic in Botswana?
To be specific, what kind of Covid-19 data is being taken now to ready the whole country for an effective and efficient mass-vaccination program?
Batswana must be made aware that the end part of vaccination will just mark the beginning of a long journey to health recovery and national redemption; that in many ways Covid-19 vaccination is just another step toward the many efforts in abeyance to fight this health pandemic, the road ahead is still long and painful.
For this purpose, and to highlight the significance of this observation we tasked our panellists with the arduous imperative of analysing the impact of mass-vaccination on society and the economy alongside the pressing issues of post-Covid-19 national health surveillance and rehabilitation programs.
Research suggests the aftermath of Covid-19 vaccination is going to be just as difficult and uncertain world as the present reality in many ways, and that caution should prevail over celebration, at least for a long time. The disease itself is projected to linger around for some time after all these mass-vaccination campaigns unless an effort is made to vaccinate everyone to the last reported case, every nation succeeds beyond herd immunity, and cure is found for Covid-19 disease. Many people are going to continue in need of medications, psychological and psychiatric services and therapy.
Is Botswana ready for this long holdout? If not, what path should we take going into the future? The Second concern is , are we going to have a single, trusted national agency charged with the mandate to set standards for our national health data system, now that we know how real bad pandemics can be, and the value of data in quickly responding to them and mitigating impact? Finally, what is being done to curate a short history of this pandemic? A national museum of health and medicine or a Public Health Institute in Botswana is overdue.
If we are to create strong sets of data policies and data quality standards for fighting future health pandemics it is critical that they find ideological and moral foundations in the artistic imagery and photography of the present human experience…context is essential to fighting such diseases, and to be prepared we must learn from every tragic health incident.
Our panellists answered most of these questions with distinguished intellectual clarity. We wish Batswana to join us in our second Mass-vaccination workshop.
Today is International Women’s Day – it’s a moment to think about how much better our news diet could be if inequities were eliminated. In 1995, when the curtains fell in one of the largest meetings that have ever brought women together to discuss women in development, it was noted that women and media remain key to development.
Twenty-six years later, the relevant “Article J” of the Beijing Platform for Action, remains unfulfilled. Its two strategic objectives with regard to Women and Media have not been met. They are Increase the participation and access of women to expression and decision-making in and through the media and new technologies of communication
Promote a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media.
Today, as we mark International Women’s Day, it’s an indictment on both media owners and civil society that women remain on the periphery of news-making. They cannot claim equal space in either the structures of newsrooms or in the content produced, be that as sources of news or as the subjects of reports. Indeed, the latest figures from WAN-IFRA’s Women in News Programme show just one in five voices in news belong to women*, be they as sources, as the author or as the main character of the news report.
Some progress was evident several years back, with stand-out women being named as chief executive officers, editors in chief, managing editors and executive editors. But these gains appear short lived in most media organisations. Excitement has turned to frustration as one-step forward has been replaced with three steps backwards. In Africa, the problem is acute. The decision-making tables of media organisations remain deprived of women and where there are women, they are surrounded by men.
Few women have followed in the footsteps of Esther Kamweru, the first woman managing editor in Kenya, and indeed sub-Saharan Africa. Today’s standout women editors include Pamela Makotsi-Sittoni (Nation Media Group, Kenya), Barbara Kaija (New Vision, Uganda), Mary Mbewe (Daily Nation, Zambia), Margaret Vuchiri (The Monitor, Uganda), Joyce Shebe (Clouds, Tanzania), Tryphinah Dongwana (Weekend Post, Botswana), Joyce Mhaville (Independent Television -ITV, Tanzania) and Tuma Abdallah (Standard Newspapers,Tanzania). But they remain an exception.
The lack of balance between women and men at the table of decision making has a rollback effect on the content that is produced. A table dominated by men typically makes decisions that benefit men.
So today, International Women’s Day is a grim reminder that things are not rosy in the news business. Achieving gender balance in news and in the structure of media organisations remains a challenge. Unmet, it sees more than half of the population in our countries suffer the consequences of bias, discrimination and sexism.
The business of ignoring the other half of the population can no longer be treated as normal. It’s time that media leaders grasp the challenge, not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it also makes a whole lot of business sense: start covering women, give them space and a voice in news-making and propel them to all levels of decision making within your organisation.
We can no longer afford to imagine that it’s only men who make and sell the news and bring in the shillings to fund the media business. Women too are worthy newsmakers. In all of our societies, there are women holding decision making positions and who are now experts in once male-only domains such as engineers, doctors, scientists and researchers.
They can be deliberately picked out to share their perspectives and expertise and bring balance to the profile of experts quoted on our news pages. Media is the prism through which society sees itself and women are an untapped audience. So, as we celebrate International Women’s Day, let us embrace diversity, which yields better news content and business products, and in so doing eliminate sexism. We know that actions and attitudes that discriminate against people based on their gender is bad for business.
As media, the challenge is ours. We need to consciously embrace and reach the commitments made 26 years ago when the Beijing Platform for Action was signed globally. As the news consuming public, you have a role to play too. Hold your news organization to account and make sure they deliver balanced news that reflects the voices of all of society.
Jane Godia is a gender development and media expert who serves as the Africa Director of Women in News programme. WOMEN IN NEWS is WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org
The eve of International Women’s Day presents an opportunity for us to think about gender equality and the long and often frustrating march toward societies that are truly equal.
As media, we are uniquely placed to drive forward this reflection and discussion. But while focusing on the challenges of gender in society, we owe it to our staff and the communities we serve to also take a hard look at the obstacles within our own organisations.
I’m talking specifically about the scourge of sexual harassment. It’s likely to have happened in your newsroom. It has likely happened to a member of your team. It happens to all genders but is disproportionately directed at women. It happens in every industry, regardless of country, culture or context. This is because sexual harassment is driven by power, not sex. Wherever you have imbalances in power, you have individuals who are at risk of sexual harassment, and those who abuse this power.
I’ve been sexually harassed. The many journalists and editors, friends and family members who I have spoken to over the years on this subject have also been harassed. Yet it is still hard for leaders to recognize that this could be happening within their newsrooms and boardrooms. Why does it continue to be such a taboo?
Counting the cost of sexual harassment
Sexual harassment is, simply put, bad for business. It can harm your corporate reputation. It is a drain on the productivity of staff and managers. Maintaining and building trust in your brand is an absolute imperative for media organisations globally. If and when a case gets out of control or is badly handled – this can directly impact your bottom line.
It is for this reason that WAN-IFRA Women in News has put eliminating sexual harassment as a top priority in our work around gender equality in the media sector. This might seem at odds with the current climate where social interactions are fewer and remote work scenarios are in place in many newsrooms and businesses. But one only needs to tune into the news to know that the abuse of power, manifested as verbal, physical or online harassment, is alive and well.
Preliminary results from an ongoing Women in News research study into the issue of sexual harassment polling hundreds of journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia indicate that more than 1 in 3 women media professionals have been physically harassed, and just under 50% have been verbally harassed. Just over 15% of men in African newsrooms reported being physically harassed, and slightly less than 1 in 4 reports being verbally harassed. The numbers for male media professionals in Southeast Asia are slightly higher than a quarter on both forms of harassment.
The first step in confronting sexual harassment is to talk about it. We need to strip away the stigma and discomfort around having open conversations about what sexual harassment is and isn’t. Media managers, it is entirely in your power to create dynamics in your own teams that are free from sexual harassment.
Publishers and CEOs, you set the organisational culture in your media company.
By being vocal in recognising that it happens everywhere, and communicating to your employees that you will not tolerate sexual harassment of any kind, you send a powerful message to your teams, and publicly. With these actions, you will help us overcome the legacy of silence around this topic, and in doing so take an important first step to create media environments that truly embrace equality.
Melanie Walker is Executive Director of Media Development of the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). She is a creator of Women in News, WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org