Connect with us

New BNYC has a monumental generational duty ahead.

“Here rests our past, present and future.” Sir Seretse Khama-1974

Sustainable Youth development and Youth empowerment in any country hinges on the existence, vibrancy, effectiveness and relevance of NYCs (National Youth Councils). Furthermore, regional and international Youth development frameworks and blueprints such as; The World Programme of Action for Youth, the Commonwealth Youth Development Index, African Youth Charter and, African Youth Decade Plan emphasize the role and significance of NYCs in Youth Development.

These frameworks consider and declare NYCs as mandatory Youth Development institutions/structures for Youth development in each and every country.  This has been driven by a growing consensus that youth participation has not only demonstrated value – it is a political right (UNHCHR, 2007).

NYCs are generally representative bodies made up of youth organizations and young people in a particular state or nation. NYCs were established after the Second World War to attend the World Festival of Youth and later the World Assembly of Youth (Rutherford, 2003). In recent times, the role and significance of NYCs has become even more pertinent and acute in the ongoing global transformation from MGDs (Millennium Development Goals) to SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals). Unlike MDGs, SDGs are heavily centered on the principle of Social Inclusion and/or Social Justice.

Thus societies and communities leading the development process through the bottom-up approach. This means, societies and communities informing and influencing policy and programming blueprints. Therefore, societies and communities becoming more organized, relevant, effective and well capacitated. This means governments, legislators and policy-makers acknowledging the critical role of societies and communities in the entire development process. 

It has been widely accepted and reaffirmed that effective and relevant NYCs are key game-changers in the sustainable development framework. It has also been widely accepted that the measure of SDGs should be through inclusion of traditionally and contemporarily marginalized cohorts such as; youth, women, rural area dwellers and people with disability.

Botswana’s NYC was established in 1974 through presidential directive (CAB 9/74), the council was, and is still, named BNYC (Botswana National Youth Council). In a book titled; ‘40years of Democracy in Botswana 1966-2005’ distinguished academic, Zibani Maundeni, states that BNYC can be described as a quasi-NGO, set up through a Presidential Directive in 1974. When establishing this essential and strategic institution Botswana’s founding president, Sir Seretse Khama, proclaimed and emphasized that ‘here rests our past, present and future’. Our founding president’s sentiments on BNYC at its inception, 41 years ago, still remain relevant in this day and time, I suspect it will remain relevant throughout the institution’s entire existence. 

Following this historic occasion BNYC was up and running, Botswana and Batswana had a structure that purely deals with Youth fears and aspirations. Literature on the performance, progress and challenges of BNYC from the 1970s to the late 1980s is not easy to find and/or access. However unconfirmed reports indicate mixed signals, some feel it was effective while others feel it was not effective. Nonetheless, reliable literature on the performance, progress and challenges of BNYC becomes more pronounced and accessible from 1996 following the formulation of our country’s first National Youth Policy.    

For instance; Maundeni (2005) narrates and proves that BNYC has achieved many remarkable milestones in the past. He states that in 2003 BNYC facilitated a very successful and powerful political empowerment programme which involved holding workshops for young people intending to contest 2004 general elections. The workshops were held in several parts of the country and attracted a huge number of youth. He continues to narrate that BNYC has played a critical role in democratizing Botswana’s public health system to make it youth friendly. These efforts include the establishment of youth health clinics and convincing the Ministry of Health to re-train nurses to ensure they have a positive approach towards youth. Maundeni also states that BNYC played another strategic role in sensitizing and mobilizing young people to reject government’s proposal to reform the Land Board Act by among others setting the entry point to 30years. The end result was a compromise with the entry age being reduced. These are indeed commendable milestones for BNYC, this author fully agrees with Maundeni in this regard.

On the other hand, researchers, social commentators and scribers such as; Keoreng & Kayawe (2013) Taziba (2014), Morima (2015) and Raditlhokwa (2014) argue that BNYC has lost its relevance and significance overtime.  Keoreng and Kayawe (2013) empirically proved that despite BNYC’s many years of existence and exceptional funding, many young people are not aware of its existence and relevance. Their study focused on youth in rural and urban areas. Correspondently Morima (2015) and Taziba (2014) argue that in recent times BNYC has somewhat lost and/or diverted from its principal mandate thus rendering it irrelevant.

They correspondently argue that it is misguided for BNYC’s progress to be measured by the number and type of cars it owns, the type of offices and furniture it owns instead of the number policy positions and motions it (BNYC) spearheads. In one of his last offerings, distinguished academic and social commentator, Log Raditlhokwa (mhsrip), argued that BNYC is the main cause of current youth hardships. Log strongly felt the fact that BNYC has gone astray and no one holds it accountable is the simple reason why our country finds itself battling with endless and mounting youth development hurdles. In his view, every time a finger is pointed at MYSC (Ministry of Youth Sports and Culture) or Government at large the same finger must be directed to BNYC.  

Though Log is no more I hope we will never forget his invaluable lessons on BNYC and other issues. Then there are the endless and countless maladministration/corruption allegations, the labour disputes and associated legal battles. I opt not go into these simply because they have attracted significant media coverage and some of them are still before the courts. However I will just acknowledge that these are some of the key issues that distracted BYNC from achieving its mandate.   

Given this brief background of BNYC it was evident major transformation were urgently needed at the Youth organization. Given the escalating levels of youth hardships, it was clear it cannot continue to business as usual at BNYC. Albert Einstein once said, doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is tantamount to insanity. I believe after several similar attempts to remedy the BNYC situation failed. It was imperative something different had to be done urgently.

When I laid my eyes on the BNYC transformation strategy about a year ago, I was deeply worried. But after I went through it I was convinced the BNYC Batswana and young people have been wishing for is finally here, after a very long time of waiting. Given BNYC’s well-known background the strategy was widely accepted in principle. The strategy was however widely criticized on the provision that the minister will appoint the leadership of the council.

Notwithstanding this, Parliament and/or cabinet approved transformation blueprint and presidential directive CAB10(B)/2015. Therefore the restructuring process was initiated, as part of the process the new BNYC, including new board, were established and the rest is history. What impressed me and caught my attention the most was the resultant level of optimism and enthusiasm among youth and Batswana at large. It was my first time seeing or hearing Botswana, esp. youth, showing such positivity when responding to a BNYC related post on social media.

More than anything else it was the comments and optimism of the youth and Batswana at large that gave me hope and reason to believe the new BNYC is the long awaited turning point. But the hope and optimism expressed on its own is not sufficient, it is the tangible results that will heal the nation, restore lost hope and most importantly empower and develop our youth. I would like to take this time to I wish the new BNYC well, in the words of our founding president, Sir Seretse Khama, you have the ‘past, present and future’ of our country in your hands.

* Taziba is a Youth Advocate, Columnist & Researcher with keen interest in Youth Policy, Civic Engagement, Social Inclusion and Capacity Development
(7189 0354/

Continue Reading


The Taiwan Question: China ramps up military exercises to rebuff US provocations

18th August 2022

US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has violated the One-China policy, and caused the escalation of tensions across the Taiwan Strait. Experts and political observers across the spectra agree that Pelosi’s actions and subsequent pronouncements by US President Joe Biden gave impetus to an already simmering tension in the Taiwan Strait, provoking China to strengthen its legitimate hold on the Taiwan Strait waters, which the US and Taiwan deem as ‘international waters’.

Pelosi’s visit to China’s Taiwan region has been heavily criticised across the globe, with China arguing that this is a serious violation of the one-China principle and the provisions of the three China-US Joint Communiqués.  In response to this reckless move which seriously undermined China’s sovereignty, and interfered in China’s internal affairs, the expectation is for China to give a firm response. Pelosi visit violated the commitments made by the U.S. side, and seriously jeopardized peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.

To give context to China’s position over Taiwan region, the history behind gives us perspective. It is also important to note that the history between China and Taiwan is well documented and the US has always recognized it.

The People’s Republic of China recognises Taiwan as its territory. It has always been  the case even before the Nationalist Republic of China government fled to the previously Japanese-ruled Island after losing the civil war on the mainland in 1949. According to literature that threat was contained for decades — first with a military alliance between the US and the ROC on Taiwan, and after Washington switched diplomatic recognition to the PRC in 1979 by the US One China policy, which acknowledges Beijing’s position that Taiwan is part of One China. Effectively, Taiwan’s administration was transferred to the Republic of China from Japan after the Second World War in 1945, along with the split between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) as a consequence of the Chinese Civil War. Disregarding this history, as the US is attempting to do, will surely initiate some defence reaction on the side of China to affirm its sovereignty.

However, this history was undermined since Taiwan claimed to democratise in the 1990s and China has grown ever more belligerent. Furthermore, it is well documented that the Biden administration, following the Trump presidency, has made subtle changes in the way it deals with Taipei, such as loosening restrictions on US officials meeting Taiwanese officials – this should make China uneasy. And while the White House continues to say it does not support Taiwanese independence, Biden’s words and actions are parallel to this pledge because he has warned China that the US would intervene militarily if China attacked Taiwan – another statement that has provoked China.

Pelosi, in her private space, would know that her actions amount to provocation of China. This act of aggression by the USA seriously undermines the virtues of sovereignty and territorial integrity which has a huge potential to destabilize not only the Taiwan Strait but the whole of the Asia- Pacific region.  The Americans know very well that their provocative behavior is deliberately invoking the spirit of separatism masqueraded as “Taiwan independence”.  The US is misled to think that by supporting separatism of Taiwan from China that would give them an edge over China in a geopolitics. This is what one Chinese diplomat said this week: “The critical point is if every country put their One-China policy into practice with sincerity, with no compromise, is going to guarantee the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.”  Therefore, it was in the wake of US House speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, that China, in a natural response revealed plans for unprecedented military exercises near the island, prompting fears of a crisis in the Taiwan Strait and the entire Asia-Pacific region. The world community must promote and foster peace, this may be achieved when international laws are respected. It may also happen when nations respect the sovereignty of another. China may be in a better space because it is well capacitated to stake its territorial integrity, what about a small nation, if this happens to it?

As to why military exercises by Beijing; it is an expected response because China was provoked by the actions of Pelosi. To fortify this position, Chinese President, Xi signed a legal basis for China’s People’s Liberation Army to “safeguard China’s national sovereignty, security and development interests”. The legal basis will also allow military missions around disaster relief, humanitarian aid and peacekeeping. In addition the legal changes would allow troops to “prevent spillover effects of regional instabilities from affecting China, secure vital transport routes for strategic materials like oil, or safeguard China’s overseas investments, projects and personnel.  It then follows that President Xi’s administration cannot afford to look weak under a US provocation. President Xi must protector China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, of which Taiwan is a central part.” Beijing is very clear on One-China Policy, and expects all world players to recognize and respect it.

The People’s Liberation Army has made it clear that it has firepower that covers all of Taiwan, and it can strike wherever it wants. This sentiments have been attributed to Zhang Junshe, a researcher at the PLA Navy Research Institute. Zheng further said, “We got really close to Taiwan. We encircled Taiwan. And we demonstrated that we can effectively stop intervention by foreign forces.” This is a strong reaction from China to warn the US against provocation and violation of the One-China Policy.

Beijing’s military exercises will certainly shake Taiwan’s confidence in the sources of its economic and political survival. The potential for an effective blockade threatens the air and shipping routes that support Taiwan’s central role in global technology supply chains. Should a humanitarian situation arise in Taiwan, the blame would squarely be on the US.

As China’s military exercises along the Taiwan Strait progress and grow, it remains that the decision by Nancy Pelosi to visit China’s Taiwan region gravely undermined peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and sent a wrong signal to “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. This then speaks to international conventions, as the UN Secretary-General António Guterres explicitly stressed that the UN remains committed to the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758. The centerpiece is the one-China principle, namely, there is but one China in the world, the government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China, and Taiwan is a part of China. It must be noted that the US and the US-led NATO countries have selectively applied international law, this has been going on unabated. There is a plethora of actions that have collapsed several states after they were attacked under the pretext of the so-called possession of weapons of mass destruction illuminating them as threats – and sometimes even without any valid reason. to blatantly launch military strikes and even unleash wars on sovereign countrie

Continue Reading


Internal party-democracy under pressure

21st June 2022

British novelist, W. Somerset Maugham once opined: “If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.”

The truism in these words cannot be underestimated, especially when contextualizing against the political developments in Botswana. We have become a nation that does not value democracy, yet nothing represent freedom more than democracy. In fact, we desire, and value winning power or clinging to power more than anything else, even if it harms the democratic credentials of our political institutions. This is happening across political parties — ruling and opposition.

As far as democracy is concerned, we are regressing. We are becoming worse-off than we were in the past. If not arrested, Botswana will lose its status as among few democratic nations in the Africa. Ironically, Botswana was the first country in Africa to embrace democracy, and has held elections every five years without fail since independence.

We were once viewed as the shining example of Africa. Those accolades are not worth it any more. Young democracies such as South Africa, with strong institutions, deserves to be exalted. Botswana has lost faith in democracy, and we will pay a price for it. It is a slippery slope to dictatorship, which will bring among other excess, assault on civil liberties and human rights violations.

Former President, Festus Mogae once stated that Botswana’s democracy will only become authentic, when a different party, other than the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) wins elections, and when the President of such party is not from Serowe.

Although many may not publicly care to admit, Mogae’s assertion is true. BDP has over the years projected itself as a dyed-in-the-wool proponent of democracy, but the moment its stay in power became threatened and uncertain, it started behaving in a manner that is at variance with democratic values.  This has been happening over the years now, and the situation is getting worse by the day.

Recently, the BDP party leadership has been preaching compromise and consensus candidates for 2024 general elections. Essentially, the leadership has lost faith in the Bulela Ditswe dispensation, which has been used to selected party candidates for council and parliament since 2003. The leadership is discouraging democracy because they believe primary elections threaten party unity. It is a strange assertion indeed.

Bulela Ditswe was an enrichment of internal party democracy in the sense that it replaced the previous method of selection of candidates known as Committee of 18, in which a branch committee made of 18 people endorsed the representatives. While it is true that political contest can divide, the ruling party should be investing in political education and strengthening in its primary elections processes. Democracy does not come cheap or easy, but it is valuable.

Any unity that we desire so much at the expense of democracy is not true unity. Like W. Somerset Maugham said, democracy would be lost in the process, and ultimately, even the unity that was desired would eventually be lost too. Any solution that sacrifice democracy would not bring any results in the long run, except misery.

We have seen that also in opposition ranks. The Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) recently indicated that its incumbent Members of Parliament (MPs) should not be challenged for their seats. While BDP is sacrificing democracy to stay in power, UDC is sacrificing democracy to win power. It is a scary reality given the fact that both parties – ruling and opposition — have embraced this position and believe democracy is the hindrance to their political ambitions.

These current reality points to one thing; our political parties have lost faith in democracy. They desire power more than, the purpose of power itself. It is also a crisis of leadership across the political divide, where we have seen dissenting views being met with persecution. We have seen perverting of political process endorsed by those in echelons of power to manipulate political outcomes in their favour.

Democracy should not be optional, it should be mandatory. Any leader proposing curtailing of democracy should be viewed with suspicion, and his adventures should be rejected before it is too late. Members of political parties, as subscribers of democracy, should collectively rise to the occasion to save their democracy from self-interest that is becoming prevalent among Botswana political parties.

The so-called compromise candidates, only benefits the leadership because it creates comforts for them. But for members, and for the nation, it is causing damage by reversing the gains that have been made over the years. We should reject leaders who only preach democracy in word, but are hesitant to practice it.

Continue Reading


The Big Deal About Piracy

21st June 2022

Piracy of all kinds continues to have a massive impact on the global creative industry and the economies of the countries where it thrives.

One of the biggest misconceptions around piracy is that an individual consumer’s piracy activities, especially in a market the size of Botswana’s, is only a drop in the pool of potential losses to the different sectors of the economy piracy affects.

When someone sitting in Gaborone, Botswana logs onto an illegal site to download King Richard online, they don’t imagine that their one download will do anything to the production house’s pocket or make a dent in the actors’ net worth. At best, the sensitivity towards this illegal pirating activity likely only exists when contemplating going about pirating a local musician’s music or a short film produced locally.

The ripple effects of piracy at whatever scale reach far beyond what the average consumer could ever imagine. Figures released by software security and media technology company, Irdeto, show that users in five major African territories made approximately 17,4 million total visits to the top 10 identified piracy sites on the internet.

The economic impact of this on the creative industry alone soars to between 40 and 97.1 billion dollars, according a 2022 Dataprot study. In addition, they estimate that “illegally streamed copyrighted content consumes 24% of global bandwidth”.

As Botswana’s creative industry remains relatively slight on the scale of comparison to industries such as Nollywood and Nilewood where the creative industry contributes a huge proportion to West and East Africa’s respective GDPs, that does not imply that piracy activities in Botswana do not have a similar impact on our economy and the ability of our creative industry to grow.

When individuals make decisions to illegally consume content via internet streaming sites they believe they are saving money for themselves in the name of enjoying content they desire to consume. Although this is a personal choice that remains the prerogative of the consumer, looking beyond the fact that streaming on illegal content sites is piracy, the ripple effect of this decision also has an endless trail of impact where funds which could be used to grow the local creative industry through increased consumption, and revenue which would otherwise be fed back into Botswana’s economy are being diverted.

“Why can’t our local creative industry grow?” “Why don’t we see more home-grown films and shows in Botswana?” are questions constantly posed by those who consume television content in Botswana. The answer to this lies largely in the fact that Botswana’s local content needs an audience in order for it to grow. It needs support from government and entities which are in a position to fund and help the industry scale greater heights.

Any organisational body willing to support and grow the local creative industry needs to exist and operate in an economy which can support its mandates. Content piracy is a cycle that can only be alleviated when consumers make wiser decisions around what they consume and how.

This goes beyond eradicating piracy activities in so far as television content is concerned. This extends to the importation and trade in counterfeit goods, resale of goods and services not intended for resale across the border, outside its jurisdiction, and more. All of these activities stunt the growth of an economy and make it nearly impossible for industries and sectors to propel themselves to places where they can positively impact society and reinvest into the country’s economy.

So what can be done to turn the tide here in Botswana in order to see our local production houses gain the momentum required to produce more, license more and expand their horizons? While those who enforce the law continue to work towards minimizing piracy activities, it’s imperative that as consumers we work to make their efforts easier by being mindful of how our individual actions play a role in preventing the success of our local creative networks and our economy’s growth.

Whether you are pirating a Hollywood Blockbuster, illegally streaming a popular Motswana artist’s music, or smuggling in an illegal decoder to view content restricted to South Africa only, your actions have an impact on how we as a nation will make our mark on the global landscape with local creative productions. Thembi Legwaila is Corporate Affairs Manager, MultiChoice Botswana

Continue Reading