This article was motivated by a comment from a colleague who recently said that ‘politics is too important to be left to politicians alone’. I concur with this sentiment. We should not shy away from politics because, believe it or not, everything we do is affected by politics. Politics affects our lives daily either positively or negatively.
As we begin the year we should pause to consider what role we play as individuals to shape the politics of our country. Maybe we should try first to understand what politics is and why we need to be involved. I would like to share my layman’s views on why politics should not be left to the politicians alone.
From a layman’s point of view what is politics? What are the qualifications a person should have to be considered a politician? Further, what impact do politicians have on each and every one of us? If we can answer these questions, perhaps we can begin to appreciate why as a nation we cannot leave politics to the politicians alone.
I understand that formal politics is referred to as the operation of a constitutional system of government and publicly defined institutions including political party functions, public policy, foreign policy, issues of war and peace and many others. Many people regard these as outside their sphere of influence and cannot be bothered. But all these issues affect all of us in the same way either negatively or positively.
Therefore it is important that each member of society must participate in a meaningful way to influence the political direction of their country not only through election of political leaders but also through continuously engaging the leadership and the people through public debates, sponsorships and whatever means available to them to encourage the most acceptable political system for the country.
Now the question is. What is a politician and what are his or her qualifications? We have politicians who have never been to school; we have politicians with only primary education; some with only secondary; some with tertiary and even with PHD qualifications. Most of these politicians if not all of them, have not studied politics at all. We have people who have studied politics and have qualification in political science, but they do not consider themselves to be politicians. So what is the qualification of a politician and does it matter?
In the days of Moses in the Old Testament, in the book of Deuteronomy, Moses asked all the people to choose some ‘wise, understanding and respected people from each tribe’. He then under the authority of God ‘appointed the chosen leaders to have authority over the people. There was no mention of educational background, only wisdom, understanding and respect.
It can be argued that education can enhance wisdom, understanding and the level of respect in society, but, I must add, this is not always the case. In the book of Romans in the Bible, Paul says, ‘let everyone be subject to the governing authorities for there is no authority except that which God has established’. To me this is the authority that has been established through free and fair elections or choosing as was done by the people during the time of Moses.
My understanding of the scripture is that a politician’s qualification is defined by the people. The people must choose wisely period. If the people fail to choose wisely then they will be governed by whatever leaders they have chosen.
So it is in the interest of the people to be involved in choosing the right leadership. Those people who stay away from choosing could distort the results of the elections resulting in the wrong leadership being chosen. If this is the case the whole country including the abdicators will bear the consequences of bad governance. In our country only about 50% of the people choose our leaders. This cannot be right; it needs to change.
We must all understand what politicians or leaders do. If we see many sick people spending days waiting for medical attention in our hospitals and clinics, it is because of the leadership we have chosen; if we see collapsing educational infrastructure and our children failing at alarming rates, it is because of the leadership we have chosen; if we see our graduates, after spending so much of our resources on them idling in the streets and in prison, it is because of the leadership we have chosen; if we see unacceptable disparity between the rich and the poor in our country, it is because of the leadership we have chosen; if we see many of our people unemployed and resorting to vile and an acceptable behavior to survive, it is because of the leadership we have chosen; if we see a thriving and vibrant economy, it is because of the leadership we have chosen. The list is long, anything you can think of.
Nothing happens in a vacuum. Everything happens in a good or bad way because of the leadership we have chosen. Do not take this too literally, leadership does not, for instance, control the whether, but it anticipates and plans for adverse effects of the whether.
So anyone who does not participate in choosing our leaders is irresponsible. Everyone with no exception, except perhaps one with a dire medical condition, must participate in our political dispensation.
Failure to participate is abdication and a serious lack of patriotism which in some countries is punishable by law. How then do you decide who is wise, understanding and respectable? I believe it is through political education. But who must provide this political education? This education cannot be left to politicians alone or certain groups.
If we do they will obviously be gross biasness and manipulations. This is where the civic society must come in, including the churches, religious institutions, the tribal authorities, the intellectuals, the learning institutions, the business community and every member of society who has the means to educate others must do so in the interest of getting the ‘tribes’ to choose wisely.
As can be seen from the local papers and BTV, the race to 2019 has begun. It is important for all of us to be engaged one way or the other in order to sensitise all our people to become alive to the reality that the future of this great republic will be determined by each and every one of us. I see that 2019 will be very important politically. For the first time, there is a real chance that we will be having two parties to choose from.
But before then we must also choose those who will represent the two parties. This is going to be a very important and landmark election and therefore we must adequately inform ourselves and those around us so that we all make informed choices. As a nation, we must consider our current reality, in terms of governance, levels of corruption, levels of unemployment especially amongst our educated youth, poverty, education, health and foreign relations amongst others.
We have a 50 year history to judge how well we have developed as a country not as individuals and whether we could have done more with the resources that God has generously bestowed. We also have a ten year history that we can also use to judge where we we are currently headed as a country. Are we headed the right direction that will transform our country into a modern and proud state. Why have we not achieved our vision 2016 goals is a question we must ask?
The opposition has now become a very interesting case study; the formation of BMD, a significant off shot from the ruling party; their zeal for a new dispensation in which everyone must benefit according to their merit not because they know someone; their zeal for economic transformation that will see modern infrastructural development spring up in all corners of this republic; a zeal for economic growth that will benefit all the people meaningfully; the modernisation of the BNF into a credible party that has no time for extremism is something to watch; where time for bickering seem to have been relegated to the archives; the small but steadfast BPP has stood the test of time.
The coming together of these parties into a seemingly formidable and congruent force in the name of UDC brings in new meaning and hope in our politics; the eminent talks that are aimed at bringing BCP and UDC together into a major force will bring not only interesting dynamics in our political landscape but will bring renewed hope for many who had become disinterested in our politics.
We have countries with fewer resources than ourselves that have developed so much within a short period of time. These countries include Singapore, Malaysia, Dubai and many others that have developed so much with limited resources. These countries seem to have deployed their human capital wisely to achieve their developmental goals. If they did this with less, we can do much more provided we choose the right leadership.
The next four years will bring another opportunity for Batswana to choose their leaders. Like Moses said choose wise, understanding and respected people. The race has started, let us all engage and participate in order to bring modern and accountable people to lead our country from 2019.
This is a question that should seriously exercise the mind of every Botswana citizen and every science researcher, every health worker and every political leader political.
The Covid-19 currently defines our lives and poses a direct threat to every aspect and every part of national safety, security and general well-being. This disease has become a normative part of human life throughout the world.
The first part of the struggle against the murderous depredation of this disease was to protect personal life through restrictive health injunctions and protocols; the worst possibly being human isolation and masks that hid our sorrows and lamentations through thin veils. We suffered that humiliation with grace and I believe as a nation we did a great job.
Now the vaccines are here, ushering us into the second phase of this war against the plague; and we are asking ourselves, is this science-driven fight against Covid-19 spell the end of pandemic anxiety? Is the health nightmare coming to an end? What happy lives lie ahead? Is this the time for celebration or caution? As the Non State Actors, we have being struggling with these questions for months.
We have published our thoughts and feelings, and our research reviews and thorough reading of both the local and international impacts of this rampaging viral invasion in local newspapers and social media platforms.
More significantly, we have successfully organised workshops about the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy and the last workshop invited a panel of health experts, professionals, and public administers to advance this social dialogue as part of our commitment to the tripartite engagement we enjoy working with Government of Botswana, Civil Society and Development partners. These workshops are virtual and open to all Batswana, foreign diplomatic missions based in Gaborone, UN agencies located in Gaborone and international academic researchers and professional health experts and specialists.
The mark of Covid-19 on our nation is a painful one, a tragedy shared by the entire human race, but still a contextually painful experience. Our response is fraught with grave difficulties; limited resources, limited time, and the urgency to not only save lives but also avert economic ruin and a bleak future for all who survive. Several vaccines are already in the market.
Parts of the world are already doing the best they can to trunk the pestilential march of this disease by rolling out mass-vaccinations campaigns that promise to evict this health menace and nightmare from their public lives. Botswana, like much of Africa, is still up in the disreputable, and, unenviable, preventative social melee of masked interactions, metered distances, contactless commerce.
We remain very much at the mercy of a marauding virus that daily runs amuck with earth shattering implications for the economy and human lives. And the battle against both infections and transmissions is proving to be difficult, in terms of finance, institutional capacities and resource mobilization. How are we prepared as government, and as citizens, to embrace the impending mass-vaccinations? What are the chances of us succeeding at this last-ditch effort to defeat the virus? What are the most pressing obstacles?
Does the work of vaccines spell an end to the pandemic anxieties?
Our panellists addressed the current state of mass-vaccination preparedness at the Botswana national level. What resources are available? What are the financial, institutional and administrative operational challenges (costs and supply chains, delivery, distribution, administering the vaccine on time, surveillance and security of vaccines?) What is being done to overcome them, or what can be done to overcome them? What do public assessments of preparedness tell us at the local community levels? How strong is the political will and direction? How long can we expect the whole exercise to last? At what point should we start seeing tangible results of the mass-vaccination campaign?
They also addressed the challenges of the anticipated emerging Vaccinated Society. How to fight the myths of vaccines and the superstitions about histories of human immunizations? What exactly is being done to grow robust local confidence in the science of vaccinations and the vaccines themselves? More significantly, how to square these campaigns vis-vis personal rights, moral/religious obligations?
What messages are being sent out in these regards and how are Batswana responding? What about issues of justice and equality? Will we get the necessary vaccines to everyone who wants them? What is being done to ensure no deserving person is left behind?
They also addressed issues of health data. To accomplish this mass-vaccination campaign and do everything right we need accurate and complete data. Poor data already makes it very hard to just cope with the disease. What is being done to improve data for the mass-vaccination campaign? How is this data being collected, aggregated and prepared for real life situation/applications throughout Botswana in the coming campaign?
We know in America, for example, general reporting and treatment of health data at the beginning of vaccinations was so poor, so chaotic and so scattered mainstream newspapers like The Atlantic, Washington Post and the New York Times had to step in, working very closely with civil society organizations, to rescue the situation. What data-related issues are still problematic in Botswana?
To be specific, what kind of Covid-19 data is being taken now to ready the whole country for an effective and efficient mass-vaccination program?
Batswana must be made aware that the end part of vaccination will just mark the beginning of a long journey to health recovery and national redemption; that in many ways Covid-19 vaccination is just another step toward the many efforts in abeyance to fight this health pandemic, the road ahead is still long and painful.
For this purpose, and to highlight the significance of this observation we tasked our panellists with the arduous imperative of analysing the impact of mass-vaccination on society and the economy alongside the pressing issues of post-Covid-19 national health surveillance and rehabilitation programs.
Research suggests the aftermath of Covid-19 vaccination is going to be just as difficult and uncertain world as the present reality in many ways, and that caution should prevail over celebration, at least for a long time. The disease itself is projected to linger around for some time after all these mass-vaccination campaigns unless an effort is made to vaccinate everyone to the last reported case, every nation succeeds beyond herd immunity, and cure is found for Covid-19 disease. Many people are going to continue in need of medications, psychological and psychiatric services and therapy.
Is Botswana ready for this long holdout? If not, what path should we take going into the future? The Second concern is , are we going to have a single, trusted national agency charged with the mandate to set standards for our national health data system, now that we know how real bad pandemics can be, and the value of data in quickly responding to them and mitigating impact? Finally, what is being done to curate a short history of this pandemic? A national museum of health and medicine or a Public Health Institute in Botswana is overdue.
If we are to create strong sets of data policies and data quality standards for fighting future health pandemics it is critical that they find ideological and moral foundations in the artistic imagery and photography of the present human experience…context is essential to fighting such diseases, and to be prepared we must learn from every tragic health incident.
Our panellists answered most of these questions with distinguished intellectual clarity. We wish Batswana to join us in our second Mass-vaccination workshop.
Today is International Women’s Day – it’s a moment to think about how much better our news diet could be if inequities were eliminated. In 1995, when the curtains fell in one of the largest meetings that have ever brought women together to discuss women in development, it was noted that women and media remain key to development.
Twenty-six years later, the relevant “Article J” of the Beijing Platform for Action, remains unfulfilled. Its two strategic objectives with regard to Women and Media have not been met. They are Increase the participation and access of women to expression and decision-making in and through the media and new technologies of communication
Promote a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media.
Today, as we mark International Women’s Day, it’s an indictment on both media owners and civil society that women remain on the periphery of news-making. They cannot claim equal space in either the structures of newsrooms or in the content produced, be that as sources of news or as the subjects of reports. Indeed, the latest figures from WAN-IFRA’s Women in News Programme show just one in five voices in news belong to women*, be they as sources, as the author or as the main character of the news report.
Some progress was evident several years back, with stand-out women being named as chief executive officers, editors in chief, managing editors and executive editors. But these gains appear short lived in most media organisations. Excitement has turned to frustration as one-step forward has been replaced with three steps backwards. In Africa, the problem is acute. The decision-making tables of media organisations remain deprived of women and where there are women, they are surrounded by men.
Few women have followed in the footsteps of Esther Kamweru, the first woman managing editor in Kenya, and indeed sub-Saharan Africa. Today’s standout women editors include Pamela Makotsi-Sittoni (Nation Media Group, Kenya), Barbara Kaija (New Vision, Uganda), Mary Mbewe (Daily Nation, Zambia), Margaret Vuchiri (The Monitor, Uganda), Joyce Shebe (Clouds, Tanzania), Tryphinah Dongwana (Weekend Post, Botswana), Joyce Mhaville (Independent Television -ITV, Tanzania) and Tuma Abdallah (Standard Newspapers,Tanzania). But they remain an exception.
The lack of balance between women and men at the table of decision making has a rollback effect on the content that is produced. A table dominated by men typically makes decisions that benefit men.
So today, International Women’s Day is a grim reminder that things are not rosy in the news business. Achieving gender balance in news and in the structure of media organisations remains a challenge. Unmet, it sees more than half of the population in our countries suffer the consequences of bias, discrimination and sexism.
The business of ignoring the other half of the population can no longer be treated as normal. It’s time that media leaders grasp the challenge, not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it also makes a whole lot of business sense: start covering women, give them space and a voice in news-making and propel them to all levels of decision making within your organisation.
We can no longer afford to imagine that it’s only men who make and sell the news and bring in the shillings to fund the media business. Women too are worthy newsmakers. In all of our societies, there are women holding decision making positions and who are now experts in once male-only domains such as engineers, doctors, scientists and researchers.
They can be deliberately picked out to share their perspectives and expertise and bring balance to the profile of experts quoted on our news pages. Media is the prism through which society sees itself and women are an untapped audience. So, as we celebrate International Women’s Day, let us embrace diversity, which yields better news content and business products, and in so doing eliminate sexism. We know that actions and attitudes that discriminate against people based on their gender is bad for business.
As media, the challenge is ours. We need to consciously embrace and reach the commitments made 26 years ago when the Beijing Platform for Action was signed globally. As the news consuming public, you have a role to play too. Hold your news organization to account and make sure they deliver balanced news that reflects the voices of all of society.
Jane Godia is a gender development and media expert who serves as the Africa Director of Women in News programme. WOMEN IN NEWS is WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org
The eve of International Women’s Day presents an opportunity for us to think about gender equality and the long and often frustrating march toward societies that are truly equal.
As media, we are uniquely placed to drive forward this reflection and discussion. But while focusing on the challenges of gender in society, we owe it to our staff and the communities we serve to also take a hard look at the obstacles within our own organisations.
I’m talking specifically about the scourge of sexual harassment. It’s likely to have happened in your newsroom. It has likely happened to a member of your team. It happens to all genders but is disproportionately directed at women. It happens in every industry, regardless of country, culture or context. This is because sexual harassment is driven by power, not sex. Wherever you have imbalances in power, you have individuals who are at risk of sexual harassment, and those who abuse this power.
I’ve been sexually harassed. The many journalists and editors, friends and family members who I have spoken to over the years on this subject have also been harassed. Yet it is still hard for leaders to recognize that this could be happening within their newsrooms and boardrooms. Why does it continue to be such a taboo?
Counting the cost of sexual harassment
Sexual harassment is, simply put, bad for business. It can harm your corporate reputation. It is a drain on the productivity of staff and managers. Maintaining and building trust in your brand is an absolute imperative for media organisations globally. If and when a case gets out of control or is badly handled – this can directly impact your bottom line.
It is for this reason that WAN-IFRA Women in News has put eliminating sexual harassment as a top priority in our work around gender equality in the media sector. This might seem at odds with the current climate where social interactions are fewer and remote work scenarios are in place in many newsrooms and businesses. But one only needs to tune into the news to know that the abuse of power, manifested as verbal, physical or online harassment, is alive and well.
Preliminary results from an ongoing Women in News research study into the issue of sexual harassment polling hundreds of journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia indicate that more than 1 in 3 women media professionals have been physically harassed, and just under 50% have been verbally harassed. Just over 15% of men in African newsrooms reported being physically harassed, and slightly less than 1 in 4 reports being verbally harassed. The numbers for male media professionals in Southeast Asia are slightly higher than a quarter on both forms of harassment.
The first step in confronting sexual harassment is to talk about it. We need to strip away the stigma and discomfort around having open conversations about what sexual harassment is and isn’t. Media managers, it is entirely in your power to create dynamics in your own teams that are free from sexual harassment.
Publishers and CEOs, you set the organisational culture in your media company.
By being vocal in recognising that it happens everywhere, and communicating to your employees that you will not tolerate sexual harassment of any kind, you send a powerful message to your teams, and publicly. With these actions, you will help us overcome the legacy of silence around this topic, and in doing so take an important first step to create media environments that truly embrace equality.
Melanie Walker is Executive Director of Media Development of the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). She is a creator of Women in News, WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org