Connect with us
Advertisement

THE RACE TO 2019 HAS BEGUN: GERRYMANDERING COULD MANIFEST ITSELF IN MANY FORMS?

This is a word I have learnt recently after BDP Gaborone region proposal to increase our constituencies from the current 57 to 120 for the 2019 elections. I then found out what gerrymandering was; it is a practice that attempts to establish political advantage for a particular party by manipulating district boundaries to create partisan advantaged constituencies as typified by the illustration in the borrowed picture above.

The word was created in reaction to redrawing of Massachusetts state senate election districts under the then governor Elbridge Gerry in the early 1800s.  Many political commentators have branded the proposal by BDP functionaries to increase constituencies for the 2019 elections as gerrymandering.  This is considered to be so because such proposal was made before by the opposition in parliament and was decisively rejected on the basis that the economy could not afford it.

How can the economy afford it now when it is said to be in intensive care requiring a stimulus package (ESP) for its resuscitation; when we have been forced to tap into our foreign reserves to support our ailing economy?  If the proposal to increase constituencies were to be approved this would give credence to those suggesting that gerrymandering to keep the ruling party in perpetual power is indeed at play.

However, increasing constituencies in order to improve effectiveness of representation of the people is desirable as was previously proposed by the opposition provided that the economy can support it. It becomes devious if it is done for the purpose of gerrymandering. The nation is therefore fore warned; be alert and awake so that in the event that the proposal is accepted, effective systems to hinder and frustrate any gerrymandering are devised by you through your representatives and civic organisations.
What else could be considered to be ‘gerrymandering’?

This intriguing gerrymandering word got my mind working. I started thinking maybe they could be other areas where gerrymandering could be at play in our country. They could be many things that are being done in this country that are similar in nature to gerrymandering and maybe we should find local names for them to. These are things or programs done for political expediency whose only aim is to shift political boundaries in the land by using public resources to manipulate people’s minds and emotions in a way that unfairly favours one party over the other. We therefore as a nation need more than ever to deeply scrutinise certain programs that seem illogical to many people but are being done and supported by seemingly knowledgeable and sane people.

Please allow me to think aloud. I can see a number of seemingly ‘gerrymandered’ programs in our country.  You will find appropriate names for these if you so wish, but for me they smell like gerrymandering dressed differently.

ESP

The way the ESP I mentioned earlier was announced and is being implemented brings a lot of doubt on whether this is a genuine attempt to stimulate the economy or whether it is a package meant to lineup pockets of some partisan functionaries and consequently their political party  to  create financial advantage over other parties? Elections are very expensive, so creating a scheme that will financial benefit party functionaries and the party will help with campaigns and possibly to buy votes especially from the poor and disadvantaged.  We understand that over a billion pula was spent even before the package was endorsed by parliament. How and when were these tenders prepared and adjudicated? Who won these tenders? Was a transparent and auditable process used?

The nation in a strange way was told to register companies in order to benefit from ESP. One wonders how one registers a company for ESP? What expertise is required for one to register such a company and for one to successfully execute an ESP project?  Should we not have rather encouraged already established and experienced companies to get ready by identifying and training Batswana for execution of these projects? We heard from a very senior party functionary through a leaked tape how tenders are created and won in this country for the ruling party supporters through tenderpreneuring.

Tenderpreneurs do not have to have any skill; they only need the political connection; they add no value to our economy. They are given tenders which tenders are implemented by others and a sizable cut from those tenders lines the pockets of these tenderpreneurs. Is this not gerrymandering dressed in public financial manipulations whose aim is to change people’s psychological boundaries to create partisan advantages?
 

Unprecedented Presidential visits to rural areas and showering the poor with gifts and?

It is a known fact that poor people are easily manipulated by simple gestures from authorities. Visiting poor people and talking to them as the president does so often is a good thing, if it is meant to hear concerns and developmental needs of these people but giving them presents is a sure sign of buying loyalty and keeping the poor poorer. These people can be the most loyal people you can come across and are always looking for something, anything from their leaders and giving them presents will surely win their hearts and loyalty. Leaders can easily manipulate them by cheap politics that does not add any value to their lives.

On the other hand, leaders who want to make a difference to the lives of the poor people do not give them soup and gifts, they build clinics, schools, roads and provide employment that pays at least a living wage; the elderly are given living allowances, food baskets and cared for not only by the family members but by the community and the country. These people have done their part for the country and it the time for the country to give back to these people who are now physically and emotionally unable to support themselves.

I often wonder where the blankets that the president doles out during his many visits come from. Do they belong to the country or do they come from the president personal resources? Or are they gifts from foreign companies or those tenderpreneurs? These are just innocent questions that the nation needs to ask unequivocally and wonder if this is not another form of gerrymandering; shifting political boundaries by buying people with gifts they do not deserve or need?
Ipelegeng

The way ipelegeng is conducted leaves a lot to be desired. It is not the ipelegeng that was originally envisaged by the founding father of this republic. Ipelegeng was a self help scheme meant to allow local communities to help the government with short to long term projects that benefited the community directly. Projects like building local roads, classrooms, dams, staff houses; contribution to building the University of Botswana was a typical ipelegeng project that current generations and generations to come will continue to benefit from.

Ipelegeng of today is about spending long hours under shades of trees chatting. Go around Gaborone and see these people at work and see what they actually achieve in a day. To me this is just a way of saying to these people we do not have jobs for you but we shall pay you P400 for registering in this ipelegeng because we care for you, you do not have to achieve anything. This also creates a lazy mentality that will become difficult to shake off.  Why can’t they create permanent jobs for cleaning town roads, like it is done throughout the world?

If you go around Mogoditshane village almost every yard in some streets is a brick yard owned by foreigners. Therefore brick molding is a growing profitable business that requires low level skills as evidenced by these many busy informal brick yards. This is an area that will continue to grow as Gaborone and surrounding areas continue to build new houses and infrastructure. Why can’t government use this ipelegeng money to set up proper brick yards and a support structure in areas such as Mogoditshane and get these people to mold bricks for sale and pay them decent wages instead of gerrymandering with ipelegeng program?

What else?

I am sure there are many other areas where gerrymandering is done in our country. The people need to understand these things so that the perpetuators could be appropriately punished at the polls. The people must know that the government owns no money; the government does not own any resources in this country. The money the country has and the resources that have been bestowed upon us belong to the people of this country equally.  The government role is to manage the financial and natural resources on our behalf; provide and facilitate the provision of all the services needed by the people.

The government is duty bound to ensure that we have adequate roads, adequate transportation and communication systems; adequate health care systems; adequate food; electricity, gas and water; adequate educational facilities and programs; must ensure that people are meaningfully employed to contribute to the growth of their economy; must ensure that we are well represented internationally in order to benefit fully from the global village.

Conclusion

I want to conclude by  quoting from the bible, ‘’ if I give all I possess to the poor…, but do not have love, I gain nothing, love is patient, love is kind, love does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud, it does not dishonor others, it is not self seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs, it does not delight in evil, but rejoices with the truth, it protects, always hopes and perseveres’’ Corinthians 13:3-7.

As a nation let us consider these words and apply them to our situations. Do we really love each other? Do our leaders really love the people or is it all about them using the people for their own selfish benefit?

The government role is not to go around giving gifts to the poor; they are organisations and charities that do that where there is need. The government role is to empower people so that they can create livelihoods for themselves.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Elected officials should guard against personal interest

23rd September 2020

Parliament was this week once again seized with matters that concern them and borders on conflict of interest and abuse of privilege.

The two matters are; review of MPs benefits as well as President Mokgweetsi Masisi’s participation in the bidding for Banyana Farms. For the latter, it should not come as a surprise that President Masisi succeeded in bid.

The President’s business interests have also been in the forefront. While President Masisi is entitled as a citizen to participate in a various businesses in the country or abroad, it is morally deficient for him to participate in a bidding process that is handled by the government he leads. By the virtue of his presidency, Masisi is the head of government and head of State.

Not long ago, former President Festus Mogae suggested that elected officials should consider using blind trust to manage their business interests once they are elected to public office. Though blind trusts are expensive, they are the best way of ensuring confidence in those that serve in public office.

A blind trust is a trust established by the owner (or trustor) giving another party (the trustee) full control of the trust. Blind trusts are often established in situations where individuals want to avoid conflicts of interest between their employment and investments.

The trustee has full discretion over the assets and investments while being charged with managing the assets and any income generated in the trust.

The trustor can terminate the trust, but otherwise exercises no control over the actions taken within the trust and receives no reports from the trustees while the blind trust is in force.

Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) Secretary General, Mpho Balopi, has defended President Masisi’s participation in business and in the Banyana Farms bidding. His contention is that, the practise even obtained during the administration of previous presidents.

The President is the most influential figure in the country. His role is representative and he enjoys a plethora of privileges. He is not an ordinary citizen. The President should therefore be mindful of this fact.

We should as a nation continue to thrive for improvement of our laws with the viewing of enhancing good governance. We should accept perpetuation of certain practices on the bases that they are a norm. MPs are custodians of good governance and they should measure up to the demands of their responsibility.

Parliament should not be spared for its role in countenancing these developments. Parliament is charged with the mandate of making laws and providing oversight, but for them to make laws that are meant solely for their benefits as MPs is unethical and from a governance point of view, wrong.

There have been debates in parliament, some dating from past years, about the benefits of MPs including pension benefits. It is of course self-serving for MPs to be deliberating on their compensation and other benefits.

In the past, we have also contended that MPs are not the right people to discuss their own compensation and there has to be Special Committee set for the purpose. This is a practice in advanced democracies.

By suggesting this, we are not suggesting that MP benefits are in anyway lucrative, but we are saying, an independent body may figure out the best way of handling such issues, and even offer MPs better benefits.

In the United Kingdom for example; since 2009 following a scandal relating to abuse of office, set-up Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA)

IPSA is responsible for: setting the level of and paying MPs’ annual salaries; paying the salaries of MPs’ staff; drawing up, reviewing, and administering an MP’s allowance scheme; providing MPs with publicly available and information relating to taxation issues; and determining the procedures for investigations and complaints relating to MPs.

Owing to what has happened in the Parliament of Botswana recently, we now need to have a way of limiting what MPs can do especially when it comes to laws that concern them. We cannot be too trusting as a nation.

MPs can abuse office for their own agendas. There is need to act swiftly to deal with the inherent conflict of interest that arise as a result of our legislative setup. A voice of reason should emerge from Parliament to address this unpleasant situation. This cannot be business as usual.

Continue Reading

Opinions

The Corona Coronation (Part 10)

9th July 2020

Ever heard of a 666-type beast known as Fort Detrick?

Located in the US state of Maryland, about 80 km removed from Washington DC, Fort Detrick houses the US army’s top virus research laboratory. It has been identified as “home to the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, with its bio-defense agency, the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and  also hosts the National Cancer Institute-Frederick and the National Interagency Confederation for Biological Research and National Interagency Biodefense Campus”.

The 490-hectare campus researches the world’s deadliest pathogens, including Anthrax (in 1944, the Roosevelt administration ordered 1 million anthrax bombs from Fort Detrick), Ebola, smallpox, and … you guessed right: coronaviruses.  The facility, which carries out paid research projects for government agencies (including the CIA), universities and drug companies most of whom owned by the highly sinister military-industrial complex, employs 900 people.

Between 1945 and 1969, the sprawling complex (which has since become the US’s ”bio-defence centre” to put it mildly) was the hub of the US biological weapons programme. It was at Fort Detrick that Project MK Ultra, a top-secret CIA quest to subject   the human mind to routine robotic manipulation, a monstrosity the CIA openly owned up to in a congressional inquisition in 1975, was carried out.  In the consequent experiments, the guinea pigs comprised not only of people of the forgotten corner of America – inmates, prostitutes and the homeless but also prisoners of war and even regular US servicemen.

These unwitting participants underwent up to a 20-year-long ordeal of barbarous experiments involving psychoactive drugs (such as LSD), forced electroshocks, physical and sexual abuses, as well as a myriad of other torments. The experiments not only violated international law, but also the CIA’s own charter which forbids domestic activities. Over 180 doctors and researchers took part in these horrendous experiments and this in a country which touts itself as the most civilised on the globe!

Was the coronavirus actually manufactured at Fort Detrick (like HIV as I shall demonstrate at the appropriate time) and simply tactfully patented to other equally cacodemonic places such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China?

THE FORT DETRICK SCIENTISTS’ PROPHECY WAS WELL-INFORMED

 

About two years before the term novel coronavirus became a familiar feature in day-to-day banter, two scientist cryptically served advance warning of its imminence. They were Allison Totura and Sina Bavari, both researchers at Fort Detrick.

The two scientists talked of “novel highly pathogenic coronaviruses that may emerge from animal reservoir hosts”, adding, “These coronaviruses may have the potential to cause devastating pandemics due to unique features in virus biology including rapid viral replication, broad host range, cross-species transmission, person-to-person transmission, and lack of herd immunity in human populations  Associated with novel respiratory syndromes, they move from person-to-person via close contact and can result in high morbidity and mortality caused by the progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).”

All the above constitute some of the documented attributes and characteristics of the virus presently on the loose – the propagator of Covid-19. A recent clinical review of Covid-19 in The Economist seemed to bear out this prognostication when it said, “It is ARDS that sees people rushed to intensive-care units and put on ventilators”. As if sounding forth a veritable prophecy, the two scientists besought governments to start working on counter-measures there and then that could be “effective against such a virus”.

Well, it was not by sheer happenstance that Tortura and Bavari turned out to have been so incredibly and ominously prescient. They had it on good authority, having witnessed at ringside what the virus was capable of in the context of their own laboratory.  The gory scenario they painted for us came not from secondary sources but from the proverbial horse’s mouth folks.

CDC’S RECKLESS ADMISSION

In March this year, Robert Redfield, the US  Director for the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),  told the House of Representatives’ Oversight Committee that it had transpired that some members of the American populace  who were certified as having died of influenza  turned out to have harboured the novel coronavirus per posthumous analysis of their tissue.

Redfield was not pressed to elaborate but the message was loud and clear – Covid-19 had been doing the rounds in the US much earlier than it was generally supposed and that the extent to which it was mistaken for flu was by far much more commonplace than was openly admitted. An outspoken Chinese diplomat, Zhao Lijian, seized on this rather casual revelation and insisted that the US disclose further information, exercise transparency on coronavirus cases and provide an explanation to the public.

But that was not all the beef Zhao had with the US. He further charged that the coronavirus was possibly transplanted to China by the US: whether inadvertently or by deliberate design he did not say.  Zhao pointed to the Military World Games of October 2019, in which US army representatives took part, as the context in which the coronavirus irrupted into China. Did the allegation ring hollow or there was a ring of truth to it?

THE BENASSIE FACTOR

The Military World Games, an Olympic-style spectrum of competitive action, are held every four years. The 2019 episode took place in Wuhan, China. The 7th such, the games ran from October 18 to October 27.  The US contingent comprised of 17 teams of over 280 athletes, plus an innumerable other staff members. Altogether, over 9000 athletes from 110 countries were on hand to showcase their athletic mettle in more than 27 sports. All NATO countries were present, with Africa on its part represented by 30 countries who included Botswana, Egypt, Kenya, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

Besides the singular number of participants, the event notched up a whole array of firsts. One report spelt them out thus: “The first time the games were staged outside of military bases, the first time the games were all held in the same city, the first time an Athletes’ Village was constructed, the first time TV and VR systems were powered by 5G telecom technology, and the first use of all-round volunteer services for each delegation.”

Now, here is the clincher: the location of the guest house for the US team was located in the immediate neighbourhood of the Wuhan Seafood Market, the place the Chinese authorities to this day contend was the diffusion point of the coronavirus. But there is more: according to some reports, the person who allegedly but unwittingly transmitted the virus to the people milling about the market – Patient Zero of Covid-19 – was one Maatie Benassie.

Benassie, 52, is a security officer of Sergeant First Class rank at the Fort Belvoir military base in Virginia and took part in the 50-mile cycling road race in the same competitions. In the final lap, she was accidentally knocked down by a fellow contestant and sustained a fractured rib and a concussion though she soldiered on and completed the race with the agonising adversity.  Inevitably, she saw a bit of time in a local health facility.   According to information dug up by George Webb, an investigative journalist based in Washington DC,     Benassie would later test positive for Covid-19 at the Fort Belvoir Community Hospital.

Incidentally, Benassie apparently passed on the virus to other US soldiers at the games, who were hospitalised right there in China before they were airlifted back to the US. The US government straightaway prohibited the publicising of details on the matter under the time-honoured excuse of “national security interests”, which raised eyebrows as a matter-of-course. As if that was not fishy enough, the US out of the blue tightened Chinese visas to the US at the conclusion of the games.

The rest, as they say, is history: two months later, Covid-19 had taken hold on China territory.  “From that date onwards,” said one report, “one to five new cases were reported each day. By December 15, the total number of infections stood at 27 — the first double-digit daily rise was reported on December 17 — and by December 20, the total number of confirmed cases had reached 60.”

TWO CURIOUS RESEARCH HALTINGS

Is it a coincidence that all the US soldiers who fell ill at the Wuhan games did their preparatory training at the Fort Belvoir military base, only a 15-minutes’  drive from Fort Detrick?

That Fort Detrick is a plain-sight perpetrator of pathogenic evils is evidenced by a number of highly suspicious happenings concerning it. Remember the 2001 anthrax mailing attacks on government and media houses which killed five people right on US territory? The two principal suspects who puzzlingly were never charged, worked as microbiologists at Fort Detrick. Of the two, Bruce Ivins, who was the more culpable, died in 2008 of “suicide”. For “suicide”, read “elimination”, probably because he was in the process of spilling the beans and therefore cast the US government in a stigmatically diabolical light. Indeed, the following year, all research projects at Fort Detrick were suspended on grounds that the institute was “storing pathogens not listed   in its database”. The real truth was likely much more reprehensible.

In 2014, there was a mini local pandemic in the US which killed thousands of people and which the mainstream media were not gutsy enough to report. It arose following the weaponisation at Fort Detrick of the H7N9 virus, prompting the Obama administration to at once declare a moratorium on the research and withdraw funding.

The Trump administration, however, which has a pathological fixation on undoing practically all the good Obama did, reinstated the research under new rigorous guidelines in 2017. But since old habits die hard, the new guidelines were flouted at will, leading to another shutdown of the whole research gamut at the institute in August 2019.  This, nonetheless, was not wholesale as other areas of research, such as experiments to make bird flu more transmissible and which had begun in 2012, proceeded apace. As one commentator pointedly wondered aloud, was it really necessary to study how to make H5N1, which causes a type of bird flu with an eye-popping mortality rate, more transmissible?

Consistent with its character, the CDC was not prepared to furnish particulars upon issuing the cease and desist order, citing “national security reasons”. Could the real reason have been the manufacture of the novel coronavirus courtesy of a tip-off by the more scrupulous scientists?

Continue Reading

Opinions

Masisi faces ultimate test of his presidency

9th July 2020

President Mokgweetsi Masisi may have breathed a huge sigh of relief when he emerged victorious in last year’s 2019 general elections, but the ultimate test of his presidency has only just begun.

From COVID-19 pandemic effects; disenchanted unemployed youth, deteriorating diplomatic relations with neighbouring South Africa as well as emerging instability within the ruling party — Masisi has a lot to resolve in the next few years.

Last week we started an unwanted cold war with Botswana’s main trade partner, South Africa, in what we consider an ill-conceived move. Never, in the history of this country has Botswana shown South Africa a cold shoulder – particularly since the fall of the apartheid regime.

It is without a doubt that our country’s survival depends on having good relations with South Africa. As the Chairperson of African National Congress (ANC), Gwede Mantashe once said, a good relationship between Botswana and South Africa is not optional but necessary.

No matter how aggrieved we feel, we should never engage in a diplomatic war — with due respect to other neighbours— with South Africa. We will never gain anything from starting a diplomatic war with South Africa.

In fact, doing so will imperil our economy, given that majority of businesses in the retail sector and services sector are South African companies.

Former cabinet minister and Phakalane Estates proprietor, David Magang once opined that Botswana’s poor manufacturing sector and importation of more than 80 percent of the foodstuffs from South Africa, effectively renders Botswana a neo-colony of the former.

Magang’s statement may look demeaning, but that is the truth, and all sorts of examples can be produced to support that. Perhaps it is time to realise that as a nation, we are not independent enough to behave the way we do. And for God’s sake, we are a landlocked country!

Recently, the effects of COVID-19 have exposed the fragility of our economy; the devastating pleas of the unemployed and the uncertainty of the future. Botswana’s two mainstay source of income; diamonds and tourism have been hit hard. Going forward, there is a need to chart a new pathway, and surely it is not an easy task.

The ground is becoming fertile for uprisings that are not desirable in any country. That the government has not responded positively to the rising unemployment challenge is the truth, and very soon as a nation we will wake up to this reality.

The magnitude of the problem is so serious that citizens are running out of patience. The government on the other hand has not done much to instil confidence by assuring the populace that there is a plan.

The general feeling is that, not much will change, hence some sections of the society, will try to use other means to ensure that their demands are taken into consideration. Botswana might have enjoyed peace and stability in the past, but there is guarantee that, under the current circumstances, the status quo will be maintained.

It is evident that, increasingly, indigenous citizens are becoming resentful of naturalised and other foreign nationals. Many believe naturalised citizens, especially those of Indian origin, are the major beneficiaries in the economy, while the rest of the society is side-lined.

The resentfulness is likely to intensify going forward. We needed not to be heading in this direction. We needed not to be racist in our approach but when the pleas of the large section of the society are ignored, this is bound to happen.

It is should be the intention of every government that seeks to strive on non-racialism to ensure that there is shared prosperity. Share prosperity is the only way to make people of different races in one society to embrace each other, however, we have failed in this respect.

Masisi’s task goes beyond just delivering jobs and building a nation that we all desire, but he also has an immediate task of achieving stability within his own party. The matter is so serious that, there are threats of defection by a number of MPs, and if he does not arrest this, his government may collapse before completing the five year mandate.

The problems extend to the party itself, where Masisi found himself at war with his Secretary General, Mpho Balopi. The war is not just the fight for Central Committee position, but forms part of the succession plan.

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!