Member of Parliament (MP) for Gaborone Bonnington South and Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) Secretary General, Ndaba Gaolathe has expressed discontentment over calls made by fellow legislators who want MP salaries to be increased.
In an exclusive interview with Weekend Post, Gaolathe argued that it was improper for some MPS to be calling for a salary review while they could instead be fighting for reforms in the governance system including the empowerment of parliament through the provision of greater intellectual infrastructure and autonomy through an independent parliamentary service with a parliamentary budget office and fully-fledged bill drafting capacity.
“If Botswana had a well configured political or parliamentary system, this debate would not have occurred in the first place, and if it did, such a system would have realised that members of parliament are ill-positioned to be the ones spearheading the debate,” he said.
“Secondly, our parliament needs the resources and facilities to do its work, before compensation can even become an issue, and as it is, our parliament will remain a side-show-talk shop without any meaningful contribution to the development or transformation of our people’s lives.”
Gaolathe holds that parliamentarians should never have to conceive debate and approve their pay in any system, as this would constitute abuse of a privileged position. “This is why a separate, independent structure and mechanism for determining the remuneration of parliamentary remuneration is necessary,” he asserted.
While he said he understood why the debate cropped up in the first place, the outspoken MP said he believes that unless parliament is reformed, even if salaries were to be doubled it will not address the real problem.
“Consider the circumstances of a member of parliament from Okavango, or one from Gantsi. They have to travel 600 or more than 700 km to reach the capitals of their constituencies. The areas of their constituencies are vast, or even larger than some countries,’ he said.
Gaolathe believes that the country’s democratic system should be carved in a way that the state is the one that facilitates the reach of those elected to represent or service the people irrespective of how far they live from the centre.
“This is therefore not a matter that should be resolved through salaries of representatives but through adequate facilitation of travel by representatives. The debate should not be about salaries, but about facilitating the reach of public representatives to ordinary citizens,” he added.
“The question should not be, and indeed is not, about salaries, but one of finding effective and sufficient means to facilitate such dutiful reach, for the sake of adequate representation of the people.”
The Gaborone Bonnington South legislator has slammed the state of the country’s legislature, noting that it is poorly resourced and the executive dictates its business.
“It is the executive that dictates parliamentary business – in a five year week, four of the days, save for a few short questions, are mainly executive branch business,” he observed.
“Only one of the five days, on Friday, when most are itching to take off for the weekend, is private members day, a day on which ordinary members of Parliament may table their own bills and motion.”
Gaolathe also said MPs do not have capacity to draft bills because of lack of personnel which means ordinary members of parliament, can only draft bills through private networks in the legal fraternity or when members of parliament raise funds, privately, to fund them.
“This is a significant anomaly. Most progressive parliaments around the world have several drafters and invest considerable time drafting bills on behalf of MPs.”
He noted that the same problem applies in parliamentary committees as they have little access to senior professionals in key disciplines, and chairpersons are selected along partisan lines.
“Many committees remain paralysed simply because chairpersons are at a loss on what their responsibilities are, and this is true especially in committees responsible for the economy and finances of our country,” he argued.
“This is a major blight and lapse in our system, which conceivably will cost our economy billions of Pula over the years.”
Gaolathe said this further demonstrates that the debate should not be about pay, but about empowering members of parliament with the intellectual infrastructure to pursue their role effectively.
The former Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis (BIDPA) think tank slammed the practice of allowing MPs to submit as many motions as they wish, sometimes more that 50 or 100 by one member of parliament, as is the case currently.
“The motions need not necessarily be well researched, or reasonable, as is so often the case,” he said.
“This means, parliament may go on for long periods considering the motions of only one member of parliament no matter how superb the ideas or motions of other members of parliament who may have submitted their motions later, those ideas will not see the light of day.”
Gaolathe said, as a result of this, substantial motions are left to languish for months.
“Motions noticed on water and power regulators, mortgage guarantee schemes, health regulator, and on special types of investments remain in limbo because of our system,’ he said.
While there is no hard-and-fast rule in politics, former Molepolole North Member of Parliament, Mohamed Khan says populism acts in the body politic have forced him to quit active partisan politics. He brands this ancient ascription of politics as fake and says it lowers the moral compass of the society.
Khan who finally tasted political victory in the 2014 elections after numerous failed attempts, has decided to leave the ‘dirty game’, and on his way out he characteristically lashed at the current political leaders; including his own party president, Advocate Duma Boko. “I arrived at this decision because I have noticed that there are no genuine politics and politicians. The current leaders, Boko and President Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi are fake politicians who are just practicing populist politics to feed their egos,” he said.
Former Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) parliamentary hopeful, Lawrence Ookeditse has rejected the idea of taking up a crucial role in the Botswana Patriotic Front (BPF) Central Committee following his arrival in the party this week. According to sources close to development, BPF power brokers are coaxing Ookeditse to take up the secretary general position, left vacant by death of Roseline Panzirah-Matshome in November 2020.
Ookeditse’s arrival at BPF is projected to cause conflicts, as some believe they are being overlooked, in favour of a new arrival. The former ruling party strategist has however ruled out the possibility of serving in the party central committee as secretary general, and committed that he will turn down the overture if availed to him by party leadership.
Ookeditse, nevertheless, has indicated that if offered another opportunity to serve in a different capacity, he will gladly accept. “I still need to learn the party, how it functions and all its structures; I must be guided, but given any responsibility I will serve the party as long as it is not the SG position.”
“I joined the BPF with a clear conscious, to further advance my voice and the interests of the constituents of Nata/Gweta which I believe the BDP is no longer capable to execute.” Ookeditse speaks of abject poverty in his constituency and prevalent unemployment among the youth, issues he hopes his new home will prioritise.
He dismissed further allegations that he resigned from the BDP because he was not rewarded for his efforts towards the 2019 general elections. After losing in the BDP primaries in 2018, Ookeditse said, he was offered a job in government but declined to take the post due to his political ambitions. Ookeditse stated that he rejected the offer because, working for government clashed with his political journey.
He insists there are many activists who are more deserving than him; he could have chosen to take up the opportunity that was before him but his conscious for the entire populace’s wellbeing held him back. Ookeditse said there many people in the party who also contributed towards party success, asserting that he only left the BDP because he was concerned about the greater good of the majority not individualism purposes.
According to observers, Ookeditse has been enticed by the prospects of contesting Nata/Gweta constituency in the 2024 general election, following the party’s impressive performance in the last general elections. Nata/Gweta which is a traditional BDP stronghold saw its numbers shrinking to a margin of 1568. BDP represented by Polson Majaga garnered 4754, while BPF which had fielded Joe Linga received 3186 with UDC coming a distant with 1442 votes.
There are reports that Linga will pave way for Ookeditse to contest the constituency in 2024 and the latter is upbeat about the prospects of being elected to parliament. Despite Ookeditse dismissing reports that he is eying the secretary general position, insiders argue that the position will be availed to him nevertheless.
Alternative favourite for the position is Vuyo Notha who is the party Deputy Secretary General. Notha has since assumed duties of the secretariat office on the interim basis. BPF politburo is expected to meet on 25th of January 2020, where the vacancy will be filled.
Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) big wigs have decided to cancel a retreat with the party legislators this weekend owing to increasing numbers of Covid-19 cases. The meeting was billed for this weekend at a place that was to be confirmed, however a communique from the party this past Tuesday reversed the highly anticipated meeting.
“We received a communication this week that the meeting will not go as planned because of rapid spread of Covid-19,” one member of the party Central Committee confirmed to this publication. The gathering was to follow the first of its kind held late last year at party Treasurer Satar Dada’s place.