The transfer of BOFEPUSU president Johannes Tshukudu and treasurer general Moses Monnatsie from the teaching professions to different ministries after both their secondment and the sabbatical leave of absence cannot be viewed as victimization.
When you are away from your station for over five years, as is the case with the two, your post is not left vacant, it is filled up so that services may continue to be provided to the nation. The argument of BOFEPUSU is suggesting that the two positions should have never been filled.
The arguments of BOFEPUSU also seems to suggest that the two comrades are relegated to lower duties. The truth of the matter is that comrades have technically been promoted at the expense of those who have been serving the employer for five years without a single movement in promotion yet comrades have been away on salaried duties of BOFEPUSU and BTU respectively.
I sat in court listening to the case against the employer by BOFEPUSU and the arguments from the federation were simply rude, infantile and aggressive. They are not infantile but are sadly demeaning to essence of basic reasoning. The case is simply an opportunity for us as BOFEPUSU to finally address issues that they have somehow declared a taboo. Why it is that changing of leadership within BOFEPUSU does not seem to be anything that will happen in our lifetime.
The facts of the matter are clear that, having been on secondment and serving the Botswana Teachers Union as President and Treasurer General respectively, both gentlemen knew that their secondment will come to an end and it did come to an end. When it came to an end, in their pursuit to serve BOFEPUSU, they further requested for sabbatical leave of absence which the employer gladly provided. They were also very well aware that the sabbatical leave will come to an end. At the end of their sabbatical leave and having gone procedurally gone back to work, the employer transfers them elsewhere as where they were serving before secondment and before sabbatical leave is saturated.
Their posts have been filled up, they have nothing to do at their previous stations. They see this as some form of vindication. Their view should be challenged for future reference. They might want to bring in the names of the Vice President Mokgweetsi Masisi and the Permanent Secretary to the President, Carter Morupisi all they want, but deep in their hearts they are fully conscious and aware of wrongly sensationalizing facts.
We all have had to be transferred at one point. Some transfers we requested whilst some were simply effected for purposes of operational effectiveness. But we did not cry foul because we don’t have ulterior motives. This brings me to the question; Who has an ulterior motive? BOFEPUSU is a big organization with many workers affiliating to it through their trade unions. It is bigger than all its current leadership combined. This then nullifies the current scenario where BOFEPUSU has taken the employer to court for some form of reinstatement.
What are we communicating to the employer, that we are so weak that two mere transfers will disband BOFEPUSU? This impression that they are creating will not only give the employer ammunition against them, but will equally present them as a spent force. In a mass organization, leaders come and leaders go for various reasons, in this instance, leaders are going because their individual contract with their own employer is taking them elsewhere.
Instead of taking the battle of ideas into the enemy territory, trade union leaders are busy positioning themselves so that they are economically well-off at the expense and pretense of leading. This has made these leaders to forget that they should be there for the people and not be fighting personal battles, battles that they have the nerve to present as interests of the workers. BOFEPUSU should realise that the current case is exposing trade unionism; that it does not want to change leaders. That whilst it is busy preaching regime change, within its fold is a different tune.
Inside is a tune of small alphas and small omegas who not only don’t want to pave way for others but who uses every given opportunity to personalize the happenings around the trade unionism world to sound as if it is the turf of workers being infringed upon. I have deviated from such thinking long time back and so I hope many have done the same thing just that only a few are capable of saying it out. This is a voice of the once oppressed, a voice that has liberate itself.
A change of guard is needed at BOFEPUSU to ensure that the interests being served are of the workers. You need not look far but use the very reasons that you are advancing for a change of government at national level, that new ideas are needed, that we need to give others a chance to prove themselves. If the ruling class is using its ruling moment to disadvantage those who want to challenge them, then you are missing the forest in your eye for the log in their eye.
Before BOFEPUSU rattles about the transfers of Tshukudu and Monnatsie, it must first and foremost immediately provide answers to the countless transfers which were done on a basis of personal vendettas against junior officers by senior civil servants across the country for many years now. These things happen every day, BOFEPUSU does not address them, it does not sing and dance on one leg to defend us when we go through these things but it wants to dance on one leg, to use our subscriptions to defend their friends. God knows why their faces are showing nothing but signs of being scared at new faces joining the old guards to take over the reins at BOFEPUSU.
Maybe they is something they are not telling us and if they don’t intend telling us, it is only fair that we spring to action to demand answers. My fear is that any protracted delay to allow other equally capable comrades to lead BOFEPUSU will come back to haunt us in the future. We don’t want to find ourselves without this federation simply because we allowed friends to privatize it for their personal gains. It is beginning to show.
Considering that Botswana is a country with high unemployment rates and few work opportunities; the natural thinking will be that the employer would have equally retired the two gentlemen for the benefit of young people walking the streets. But the government it appears has been considerate enough, possibly acting out of fear of being blamed for victimisation. We must appreciate that we are able to enjoy secondment and follow it up by sabbatical leave. But that we want all these to continue only so that we serve unions and not serve the country through public service yet want to be leaders of public service trade unionism is simply not acceptable.
I am aware that it is not enough for me to simply condemn these acts of personalising trade unionism. But I am pleading with you fellow workers that we must apply our minds to present and table a decisive plan of action on how to mitigate any further damage to BOFEPUSU that cripples the ability of our strength to ensure that we uphold, protect and sustain what we stand for as a federation.
The longer you comrades continue to be missing in action, the more workers will suffer and this will have perverse effects on the already depressed welfare of the workers and ultimately the economy. The ordinary workers who are not trade union leaders should not allow BOFEPUSU to show inaction whilst our communities suffer without sustained public service simply because comrades don’t want to work for the state yet they want to be in trade unions representing interests of public workers.
British novelist, W. Somerset Maugham once opined: “If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.”
The truism in these words cannot be underestimated, especially when contextualizing against the political developments in Botswana. We have become a nation that does not value democracy, yet nothing represent freedom more than democracy. In fact, we desire, and value winning power or clinging to power more than anything else, even if it harms the democratic credentials of our political institutions. This is happening across political parties — ruling and opposition.
As far as democracy is concerned, we are regressing. We are becoming worse-off than we were in the past. If not arrested, Botswana will lose its status as among few democratic nations in the Africa. Ironically, Botswana was the first country in Africa to embrace democracy, and has held elections every five years without fail since independence.
We were once viewed as the shining example of Africa. Those accolades are not worth it any more. Young democracies such as South Africa, with strong institutions, deserves to be exalted. Botswana has lost faith in democracy, and we will pay a price for it. It is a slippery slope to dictatorship, which will bring among other excess, assault on civil liberties and human rights violations.
Former President, Festus Mogae once stated that Botswana’s democracy will only become authentic, when a different party, other than the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) wins elections, and when the President of such party is not from Serowe.
Although many may not publicly care to admit, Mogae’s assertion is true. BDP has over the years projected itself as a dyed-in-the-wool proponent of democracy, but the moment its stay in power became threatened and uncertain, it started behaving in a manner that is at variance with democratic values. This has been happening over the years now, and the situation is getting worse by the day.
Recently, the BDP party leadership has been preaching compromise and consensus candidates for 2024 general elections. Essentially, the leadership has lost faith in the Bulela Ditswe dispensation, which has been used to selected party candidates for council and parliament since 2003. The leadership is discouraging democracy because they believe primary elections threaten party unity. It is a strange assertion indeed.
Bulela Ditswe was an enrichment of internal party democracy in the sense that it replaced the previous method of selection of candidates known as Committee of 18, in which a branch committee made of 18 people endorsed the representatives. While it is true that political contest can divide, the ruling party should be investing in political education and strengthening in its primary elections processes. Democracy does not come cheap or easy, but it is valuable.
Any unity that we desire so much at the expense of democracy is not true unity. Like W. Somerset Maugham said, democracy would be lost in the process, and ultimately, even the unity that was desired would eventually be lost too. Any solution that sacrifice democracy would not bring any results in the long run, except misery.
We have seen that also in opposition ranks. The Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) recently indicated that its incumbent Members of Parliament (MPs) should not be challenged for their seats. While BDP is sacrificing democracy to stay in power, UDC is sacrificing democracy to win power. It is a scary reality given the fact that both parties – ruling and opposition — have embraced this position and believe democracy is the hindrance to their political ambitions.
These current reality points to one thing; our political parties have lost faith in democracy. They desire power more than, the purpose of power itself. It is also a crisis of leadership across the political divide, where we have seen dissenting views being met with persecution. We have seen perverting of political process endorsed by those in echelons of power to manipulate political outcomes in their favour.
Democracy should not be optional, it should be mandatory. Any leader proposing curtailing of democracy should be viewed with suspicion, and his adventures should be rejected before it is too late. Members of political parties, as subscribers of democracy, should collectively rise to the occasion to save their democracy from self-interest that is becoming prevalent among Botswana political parties.
The so-called compromise candidates, only benefits the leadership because it creates comforts for them. But for members, and for the nation, it is causing damage by reversing the gains that have been made over the years. We should reject leaders who only preach democracy in word, but are hesitant to practice it.
Piracy of all kinds continues to have a massive impact on the global creative industry and the economies of the countries where it thrives.
One of the biggest misconceptions around piracy is that an individual consumer’s piracy activities, especially in a market the size of Botswana’s, is only a drop in the pool of potential losses to the different sectors of the economy piracy affects.
When someone sitting in Gaborone, Botswana logs onto an illegal site to download King Richard online, they don’t imagine that their one download will do anything to the production house’s pocket or make a dent in the actors’ net worth. At best, the sensitivity towards this illegal pirating activity likely only exists when contemplating going about pirating a local musician’s music or a short film produced locally.
The ripple effects of piracy at whatever scale reach far beyond what the average consumer could ever imagine. Figures released by software security and media technology company, Irdeto, show that users in five major African territories made approximately 17,4 million total visits to the top 10 identified piracy sites on the internet.
The economic impact of this on the creative industry alone soars to between 40 and 97.1 billion dollars, according a 2022 Dataprot study. In addition, they estimate that “illegally streamed copyrighted content consumes 24% of global bandwidth”.
As Botswana’s creative industry remains relatively slight on the scale of comparison to industries such as Nollywood and Nilewood where the creative industry contributes a huge proportion to West and East Africa’s respective GDPs, that does not imply that piracy activities in Botswana do not have a similar impact on our economy and the ability of our creative industry to grow.
When individuals make decisions to illegally consume content via internet streaming sites they believe they are saving money for themselves in the name of enjoying content they desire to consume. Although this is a personal choice that remains the prerogative of the consumer, looking beyond the fact that streaming on illegal content sites is piracy, the ripple effect of this decision also has an endless trail of impact where funds which could be used to grow the local creative industry through increased consumption, and revenue which would otherwise be fed back into Botswana’s economy are being diverted.
“Why can’t our local creative industry grow?” “Why don’t we see more home-grown films and shows in Botswana?” are questions constantly posed by those who consume television content in Botswana. The answer to this lies largely in the fact that Botswana’s local content needs an audience in order for it to grow. It needs support from government and entities which are in a position to fund and help the industry scale greater heights.
Any organisational body willing to support and grow the local creative industry needs to exist and operate in an economy which can support its mandates. Content piracy is a cycle that can only be alleviated when consumers make wiser decisions around what they consume and how.
This goes beyond eradicating piracy activities in so far as television content is concerned. This extends to the importation and trade in counterfeit goods, resale of goods and services not intended for resale across the border, outside its jurisdiction, and more. All of these activities stunt the growth of an economy and make it nearly impossible for industries and sectors to propel themselves to places where they can positively impact society and reinvest into the country’s economy.
So what can be done to turn the tide here in Botswana in order to see our local production houses gain the momentum required to produce more, license more and expand their horizons? While those who enforce the law continue to work towards minimizing piracy activities, it’s imperative that as consumers we work to make their efforts easier by being mindful of how our individual actions play a role in preventing the success of our local creative networks and our economy’s growth.
Whether you are pirating a Hollywood Blockbuster, illegally streaming a popular Motswana artist’s music, or smuggling in an illegal decoder to view content restricted to South Africa only, your actions have an impact on how we as a nation will make our mark on the global landscape with local creative productions. Thembi Legwaila is Corporate Affairs Manager, MultiChoice Botswana
This is a dangerous moment for Europe and for freedom-loving people around the world. By launching his brutal assault on the people of Ukraine, Vladimir Putin has also committed an assault on the principles that uphold global peace and democracy. But the people of Ukraine are resilient.
They’ve had a democracy for decades, and their bravery is inspiring the world. The United States, together with our Allies and partners across the globe, will continue to support the Ukrainian people as they defend their country. By choosing to pay for a war instead of investing in the needs of Russians, Putin’s invasion of Ukraine will be a strategic failure for the Kremlin and ravage the future of the Russian people.
When the history of this era is written, it will show that Putin’s choice to launch an unprovoked, unjust, and premeditated attack left the West more unified and Russia exponentially weaker.
United in Our Response
This will not end well for Vladimir Putin. Together, the United States and our Allies and partners are taking action to hold Russia accountable. As a result of unprecedented global sanctions coordination, the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Japan, and Canada have removed selected Russian banks from the SWIFT messaging system and imposed restrictive measures on the Russian Central Bank.
President Biden announced sweeping financial sanctions and stringent export controls that will damage Russia’s economy, financial system, and access to cutting-edge technology. After Putin began his invasion, the ruble hit its weakest point in history, and the Russian stock market plunged.
Along with the United Kingdom and European Union, the United States imposed sanctions on the architects of this war, including Putin himself.
By moving in close coordination with a powerful coalition of Allies and partners representing more than half of the global economy, we have magnified the impact of our actions to impose maximum costs on Putin and his regime. In response to Putin’s war of choice, we will limit Russia’s ability to do business in U.S. dollars.
We will stunt Russia’s ability to finance and grow its military. We will impair Russia’s ability to compete in the global economy. And we are prepared to do more.
In addition to economic penalties, this week President Biden authorized an additional $1 billion over the $350 million of security assistance he recently approved, and a $650 million in 2021, to immediately help Ukraine defend itself, bringing America’s total security assistance to Ukraine over the past year to $2 billion.
We also stand ready to defend our NATO Allies. President Biden has coordinated with Allied governments to position thousands of additional forces in Germany and Poland as part of our commitment to NATO’s collective defense.
He authorized the deployment of ground and air forces already stationed in Europe to NATO’s eastern and southeastern flanks: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Romania. Our Allies have also added their own forces and capabilities to ensure our collective defense. There should be no doubt about the readiness of the greatest military Alliance in the history of the world: NATO is more united than ever.
The United States has also coordinated with major oil-producing and consuming countries to underscore our common interest in securing global energy supplies. We are working with energy companies to surge their capacity to supply energy to the market, particularly as prices increase.
Putin’s Unprovoked and Premeditated War
This was an attack that Vladimir Putin has planned for a long time. He methodically moved more than 150,000 troops and military equipment to Ukraine’s border. He moved blood supplies into position and built field hospitals, demonstrating his intentions all along.
He rejected every good-faith effort by the United States and our Allies and partners to address his fabricated security concerns and to avoid needless conflict and human suffering by engaging in diplomacy and dialogue.
Putin executed his playbook exactly as we had warned he would do. We saw Russia’s proxies increase their shelling in the Donbas. We saw the Russian government launch cyber-operations against Ukraine. We saw staged political theater in Moscow and heard outlandish and baseless claims made about Ukraine in an attempt to justify Russia’s aggression.
Russia continues to justify its military aggression by falsely claiming the need to stop “genocide” in Ukraine – despite there being no evidence that genocide was occurring there. We saw Russia use these tactics before when they invaded Ukraine in 2014 and Georgia in 2008.
And then, at almost the very same moment the United Nations Security Council was meeting to stand up for Ukraine’s sovereignty and forestall disaster, Putin launched his invasion in violation of international law. Missiles began to rain down, striking historic cities across Ukraine. Then came air raids, columns of tanks, and battalions of troops, all riding a renewed wave of disinformation and outright lies.
We have been transparent with the world. We declassified our intelligence about Russia’s plans so there could be no confusion and no cover up. Putin is the aggressor. Putin chose this war. And now his people will bear the consequences of his decision to invest in war rather than in them.
Transatlantic Unity and Resolve Stronger Than Ever
Putin’s goal of dividing the West has failed. In the face of one of the most significant challenges to European security and democratic ideals since World War II, the United States and our Allies and partners have joined together in solidarity. We have united, coordinating intensively to engage as one with Russia and Ukraine, provided assistance to Ukraine, developed a broad response, and reaffirmed our commitment to NATO.
Putin has failed to divide us. Putin has failed to undermine our shared belief in the fundamental right of sovereign nations to choose their destiny and their allies. And Putin will fail to erase the proud nation of Ukraine.
The next few days, weeks, and months will be incredibly difficult for the people of Ukraine. Putin has unleashed great suffering on them. But the Ukrainian people have known 30 years of independence, and they have repeatedly shown they will not tolerate anyone who tries to take their country backwards.
The world is watching this conflict closely, and if Russian forces commit atrocities, we will explore all international mechanisms that could be used to bring those responsible – whether members of the military or their civilian leadership – to account.
Putin’s aggression against Ukraine will cost Russia profoundly, both economically and strategically. The Russian people deserve better from their government than the immense cost to their future that this invasion has precipitated.
Liberty, democracy, and human dignity are forces far more powerful than fear and oppression. In the contest between democracy and autocracy, between sovereignty and subjugation, make no mistake: Freedom will prevail.