A report detailing how a company by the name Global Consultant won a bid of restructuring the Botswana Football Association (BFA) road-map has been released and the findings point to a flawed process conducted to favour one competitor.
The report which was seen by WeekendSport reveals that Global Consultants (PTY) LTD was never part of the bidding selection, but rather its name cropped up at the eleventh hour, a scenario that caused much havoc.
On March 4, 2015, the report reveals, a total of 8 consulting companies were identified from the market, and later issued with detailed tender Terms of Reference (TOR), as a response to the invitation to tender for the provision of an organizational structure review and design. These 8 companies were given a deadline of 20TH March 2015 to submit their tender documents.
It emerges from the report that Global Consultant was not among the listed companies even when the deadline for tender submission was extended to the date of 24TH March. The eight companies are De Chazal DU MEE consulting (DCDMC) LTD, EOH Botswana, Friendly Planet Holding (PTY) LTD, Innolead Consulting, Leadex Consulting, Performance Growth Consultants, Service Bridges Consulting and Stilistics Sportainmnet.
As the bidding procedure was on-going, it was discovered that only 3 companies submitted tender proposals in response to the Terms of Reference (TOR). The three companies are De Chazal DU MEE, EOH Botswana and Innolead Consulting.
It is further revealed that on the 5TH of May, a tender evaluation meeting was scheduled with a proposed evaluation team to speed up the vetting exercise. However, it emerged that such a meeting never took place as it was advised that the then recently appointed Human Resources Manager (HRM) should be involved. A belief was that the HRM would manage the envisaged project going forward.
Three months later, on August 13th, the procurement officer handed over the 3 tender submissions unopened to the HRM.
Surprisingly, the HR Manager, on the same date sent an invite to three more suppliers with a closing date of 21ST August. The HR Manager, whose name is known this publication, did not inform the three original suppliers. Rather, trhe three suppliers were informed about the resubmission with only two days left before the deadline, on the 19th of August. When given the report, the HR Manager said that only one supplier responded and was therefore awarded the contract by the BFA CEO without the involvement of the evaluation team, or at most, the National Executive Committee of the Association.
On the same day of August 19, according to the report, the procurement officer forwarded the list of those who tendered to the HR Manager. There, the process was on a ‘fast mode’. It is discovered that the HR Manager wrote to Innolead and DCDM informing them that the project had been revived for them to re-submit and tender for consideration by the Tender Committee.
According to the HR Manager’s report, on the closing date, three additional suppliers were added to the list. Curiously, one bidder being Global Consultants submitted the bid. All the while, the report shows that there was no record of the tender opening process as provided for on the TOR. Neither was there any record of an Evaluation Committee being part of the process as per the TOR’s clause 9.1 and 9.2.
As time unfolded, Kitso Kemoeng sent to the NEC the latest updates where he indicated that ‘‘the management was recommending Global consult to be awarded the contract.’’
The report however says there was no indication of an evaluation process carried out. In fact, it is submitted that the opening and evaluation of the tender was done by the HR Manager alone- a finding confirmed by the CEO at one of the meetings.
As the issue of awarding Global Consult heightened, the CEO made a recommendation to the NEC, advising that the company be awarded the contract through round robin resolution. The report says only two members responded positively. The number of the present NEC members is not indicated but it emerges that the round robin process was against the TOR clauses.
At this stage, the report states that severe damage was already done. The HRM’s report shows that some bidders who scored below the technical threshold proceeded to the next stage of opening financial proposal.
On October 22, 2015, at the scheduled NEC meeting, the issue of the changed TORs was raised and Vice President- Finance, Marketing Research, requested that the NEC be furnished with such because the dates proposed by Global Consult were different to those in the approved Terms of Reference.
At that point, a meeting between BFA President Tebogo Sebego and his three Vice Presidents (Marshlow Motlogelwa, Steven Phetlhe and Basadi Akoonyatse) was set on November 4 to extensively discuss the matter.
At the same meeting, the report reveals, the President acknowledged through an email seen by WeekendSport that indeed the process had been flawed. He further advised that the high authority ‘‘should consider relooking at the whole exercise to avoid governance lapses’’.
However, a day later, everyone was left shell shocked upon learning that the CEO had already signed the contract. According to the report, at a meeting on November 5, when a FIFA Development Officer was invited to clarify the issue on restructuring, confusion surrounded the meeting, as the FIFA officer revealed that a contract with Global Consult was signed with FIFA funding the exercise.
This publication previously reported that the matter was handed to the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC). When quizzed about the issue at the time, BFA CEO Kitso Kemoeng refused altogether to share details with this publication. ‘‘I think you should ask DCEC, they are best placed to answer your question,’’ he said. When further pressed about the restructuring issue, the CEO said, ‘‘I cannot talk about that matter, those who have informed you should have given you all the details.’’ Before, the incumbent CEO had laughed off the issue that he was conniving with the president to block other members from discussing the matter.
This is the same issue that had dominated media headlines for some time. The president was accused by several NEC members for signing the contract with Global consultant without engaging his committee. It was alleged that the contract was copied to FIFA- the world football governing body to inject cash for the restructuring exercise. At the time, the president was asked about the issue and he only responded that, ‘‘we will take the matters by the strides, I have not heard of any revolt and the law shall prevail’’.
The Government of Botswana through the Ministry of Youth Empowerment, Sport and Culture Development, has expressed its underlying desire to reawaken and improve sport policy.
This is also in line with the declaration made by President Mokgweetsi Masisi in his third State of the Nation Address (SONA) this week about the need to improve sport performance in the country. The sport policy was first enacted in 2001 when the Department of Sport and Recreation was under the Ministry of Labour and Home Affairs.
The review of this policy is expected to commence soon and strive to address all socio-economic problems bedevilling sport. The examination will start from the elements that speak to the direct processes of national dialogue of sport and come up with recommendations for improvement.
As things stand, the Sport Ministry has coordinated a task force to deal with the taxing issue of school sports where teachers have downed tools demanding special kind of payment for partaking in extracurricular activities. The government through various means has been made aware that sport forms an integral part of the country’s vision.
If the policy is finally revised, the country and other stakeholders will eventually achieve national development, unity and continued economic growth. “The national Sport Commission Act is also being reviewed to facilitate sport to contribute to the economy through commercialization and professionalism, as well as to improve the welfare and the rights to our sportspersons,” Masisi said in his address.
The review will once again take a long route of extensive consultative processes where critical factors were initially identified as continuous constraint to sport development. There is a wide ranging view that sport is solely for recreation. This anomaly is fast becoming a matter of yesteryears as more athletes are making a living out of sport.
In October of 1997, a discussion paper on sport policy development was prepared. At the time, the workshop brought together policy and decision makers. The discussions precisely centred on issues of sport participation and development. Participants included among others, Botswana National Sport Commission (BNSC), Botswana National Olympic Committee (BNOC) Botswana National Youth Council (BNYC) and National Sports Associations.
There was the discovery of limited funding in sport and poor sporting facilities in the country. This has negatively impacted on the performance of national sports associations, particularly on the global stage. As a measure to this problem, the government has decided to build 10 mini stadia to up participation and performance.
In 2001 when the policy was formulated, there was an agreement that the national guiding principles of democracy, development, unity, self-reliance and botho are cardinal to the development strategy of socio-economic development planning. The Ministry believes that sport and recreation in Botswana have a close relationship with all these national principles.
When speaking to this publication, the Chief Executive Officer of BNSC, Tuelo Serufho said there is indeed an overwhelming appetite to improve sport performance and participation in the country. “Yes we need to engage both BNSC and BNOC to improve and review the sport policy more because it has been overtaken by time…it needs to be aligned with modern sports trends,” Serufho briefly shared.
The world football governing body, Federation of International Football Association (FIFA), has ordered trouble torn Mochudi Centre Chiefs to compensate their former coach, Philani Mabhena, after unceremoniously dismissing him in the summer of 2019 with only a few months left on his contract.
FIFA agreed with Mabhena that Magosi, as Chiefs are affectionately called breached his employment contract. FIFA is of the view that Chiefs had no prima facie evidence that could lead to unilateral termination of a contract. The decision of FIFA’s status committee is that Chiefs should pay the Zimbabwean born coach an amount of BWP 111, 100 within 30 days.
The money is divided into two categories. BWP 56 100 which is derived from the period of 11 August 2019 until the end of contract. The other amount is P55 000 which was accumulated between January 2019 until a time he was sacked. Those amounts was accumulation of unpaid wages.
FIFA warned that more stringent action will be taken against Chiefs should they fail to deposit the amount before the set deadline. Mabhena claimed that Chiefs, before his contract was terminated, was never paid his signing on fee of P 15 000 as settlement remuneration.
He also argued that he had gone a couple of months without receiving his monthly wages. According to the terms of the contract, he was supposed to be paid P 15 000 every month. Chiefs to their bravery, has accepted the outstanding salary arrears of the former coach that stretched to P 56 100.
FIFA accused the shrinking Kgatleng giants of negligence and refusal to honour contractual obligations and this has brought far reaching consequences. Should Chiefs fail to honour FIFA orders, they are likely to be banned from signing coaches and players. They are also likely to forfeit points when the football season begins until full payment is completed.
The debts come at a time when the club desperately seeks a premier league return. They were rumoured to be eyeing to buy one premier league status to compete for the grandest prizes like before. Chiefs were relegated because of poor administration at board level. The team tried many times to professionalize but each attempt was beaten by the club society raging wars that consequently stalled progress.
Mochudi Centre Chiefs sporting club was first registered in July of 1974. The club was registered as a society under the societies Act of Botswana as a football team. It is noted that the club participated in the upper league of BFA under the terms prescribed in the constitution of the association together with the confinement of the societies act.
Premier League rookies, Sua Flamingos have fired their coach Raizor Tsatsilebe for allegedly speaking up for his players. Tsatsilebe who joined the team last season and helped them win Debswana First Division North league, was at the end of the season thanked with a one year contract extension.
His stay at Sua was to end in July of 2021 but things took a turn for the worst recently when management was said to be fed up with his demands. Reports claim that the Sua management felt the coach was more on the side of the players and did not approach things holistically, a move that led to his untimely expulsion.
“Since his arrival this side, he has been vocal about treatment of players, their welfare and as you know, players here have not been receiving their salaries but are given allowances on monthly basis. He felt maybe the club should at least pay half salaries as they have now resumed training. He also requested that the team should sign some players but that did not happen despite promises by the club. The final nail was when management left his goalkeeper coach, Terence Modikwe and signed Kagiso Tshelametsi without consulting him,” said a source at the team.
The club Chairman, Tirelo Thebe, confirmed that they have decided to part ways as with the feeling that they can no longer work together. “Yes it’s true we met with the coach and we agreed to terminate his one year contract because the relationship has soured. We cannot disclose more than this because it’s an internal matter and in the meantime our assistant coach will take over on interim basis while we look for his replacement,” said Thebe.
Tsatsilebe on his part felt hard done by the team after promoting them to the elite league- something they have been failing to achieve. “They are the ones who opted to terminate the contract not me and they couldn’t give me reasons why they are terminating. It’s a pity we coaches encounter such things in our lives but it has to continue,” said the 49 year old coach.