MilkAfrica, a joint project between Lobatse Town Council and a Zimbabwean refugee, which was expected to create around 500 jobs and supply the country with milk as from early 2015, has not started operations and is currently facing a lawsuit over a mere P16 000 debt.
The project was estimated at the value of P100 million. The town council’s political wing has also started casting doubt over the project which was given 1375.4470 hectares of land by the Council. Molaodi Mantle, who sits in the MilkAfrica board and representing the council, had admitted in an interview that pressure is mounting on the Council leadership to produce a full report as to what is happening to the project or release the land back to be distributed to the general public for residential purpose.
“It is true that councillors are demanding answers, but we are still waiting for Mr Matibe to brief us. He is the one who can answer all the questions. As you know, we just have 10 percent share of the project and the 90 percent belong to the company,” explained Mantle. The Councillors fear that the council could have been sold a dummy right from the beginning.
Allegedly, the company’s founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Philemon Thambatshira Matibe, a Zimbabwean refugee, who lives in the United States of America had no or very little money to invest in the project, but planned to get loans from the local bank using the leased land as security. However, the council is said to have refused to sign off the land into his name or that of his company, Lobatse Dairy (PTY) Ltd, thus the delay of funding and launch of production.
The Council leased the big chunk of land to Lobatse Dairy for a duration of 25 years, a period which started in January 2013. According to the agreement, the company is to payout a minimum of P2 Million over that period to the council. At the end of the lease the land is to revert back to the Council, with an option to a single renewal of this lease.
As of this year the project should have already injected P100 000 to the council, but instead it is entangled in minor debts. “The whole project is misguided, everything is so confused. The workers have abandoned the premises, the owners are not always around and the council always washes its hands from the debt,” revealed Charles Tafa, a contractor who was hired to do some jobs for the construction.
Tafa who said he had collected his machinery from the seemingly abandoned project site, revealed that there are other contractor who are owed more money, like the one who supplied manure for the site. Tafa’s matter is currently before the Lobatse Magistrate court. The former Member of Parliament for Lobatse, Nehemiah Modubule has also expressed doubt on the project.
This is what he had to say about the project which at inception, enjoyed the support of the former Vice President, Ponatshego Kedikilwe, “At the time when I was in parliament, I went to see Rre Kedikilwe about this project. At the time, some farmers, especially white farmers were complaining that MilkAfrica project was given such a big land such that it had closed passages to their farms, but I was told that the council is doing appraisable job.
My question to him was, since this man (Matibe) is a refugee on transit was it wise to invest this much on this project, was he to be trusted.” Modubule added that, he never believed in the project from the beginning but the council and the Vice President had a different view and even sent several employees to be trained for the job overseas, “some of who have not been able to complete their training because sponsorship is no longer coming through. Those from the Ministry of Agriculture have returned and resumed working from the Ministry.”
The Ministry of Agriculture was to partner or had partnered with the council on this project to ensure that the cultivation of the leased land is in accordance with good husbandry and the laws of Botswana, “in particular the Lessee shall comply with the provisions of any laws concerning the conservation of natural resources and good husbandry as defined by the Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Environment, Wildlife and Tourism from time to time.”
The town clerk, Malebogo Kruger could not be reached for comment. Nonetheless, Councillor Mantle who sits in the MilkAfrica board had confirmed that the council still trust that the project will take off as promised. In fact, Mayor Kruger together with Mantle recently travelled to Kimberly, South Africa where they were to view the cattle stocked for the milk project. Mantle confirmed that they indeed saw the 580 cows, which were 3 months pregnant, but maintains that he does know whether they have been bought or not.
“It is Mr Matibe who can confirm the payment part,” Mantle pointed out. However one Councillor revealed that, “the Council leadership went to Kimberly under wrong impression that the cattle had been bought, only to learn from the seller that they have a blank cheque.” But Mantle maintains that the allegation is not true and added that, from Kimberly they were to travel to Capetown to view the water purifying machines which are to form part of MilkAfrica plant. Nonetheless he declined to explain why the trip did not materialise rather saying it is the Mayor who has to answer some of the questions.
Meanwhile Councillors are breathing hard on the Mayor and her team and demand that the land be taken back and distributed to members of the public for residential purposes. The project was expected to bring back life to Lobatse following the transfer of High court and court of Appeal headquarters to Gaborone, which left the town almost abandoned. According to records the leased land shall be used solely for a dairy milking parlour, paddock and pasture establishment, milk processing, offices, staff housing and related amenities only. The lease of the land is to continue for a period of twenty five years.
POWER GAMES BEHIND THE PROJECT The MilkAfrica project was not without impediments from the word go. Sponsors of the project had to force their way into the office of the then Vice President Ponatshego Kedikilwe for the project to go ahead. The Minister of Environment Wildlife and Tourism, Tshekedi Khama had refused to give the project and Environmental Impact Assessment certificate. He was first not convinced by the pitch from the Lobatse Council and the Zimbabwean investor. He made it clear that he will not grant the project an EIA.
Kedikilwe had to use his muscle reportedly reasoning that the Council was trying its best to create jobs. With all the drama unfolding Tshekedi Khama will feel vindicated and it remains to be seen whether the project will ever take off.
Public Servants should brace themselves for some changes as the government is in an overdrive mode to overhaul the public sector. The government has also set the tone for the looming changes as it has added the public sector to its looming list of major and sweeping reforms.
This is contained in a savingram from the Permanent Secretary to the President (PSP) Emmah Peloetletse’s office showing how the government intends to “take stock” of all reforms in the public sector through the establishment of an inventory. Peloetletse’s savingram addressed to various ministries and the Directorate of Public Service Management (DPSM) reveals that the government is working around the clock to implement some changes in the Public Service.
The savingram reminded Permanent Secretaries of various ministries and DPSM that the public sector reforms unit (PSRU) at the Office of the President is mandated with Coordinating Reforms across the Public Service. “This essentially entails providing the strategic guidance and facilitation in the implementation of reforms across the Public Service. In this endeavour the Unit has in the past with Technical Assistance from European Union developed a template for documenting Reforms in the Public Service and documented ten (10) major reforms across the Public Service,” reads the savingram in part. It added that “The Unit has lately rolled out the Change Management Framework in an effort to facilitate effective and efficient management of change in the Public Service.”
According to the savingram, it has been noted that for a variety of reasons the use of the template for documenting reforms has not been universally used across the Botswana Public Service. It further states that to facilitate the documentation of the reforms it is essential that an inventory of the various reforms across the Public Service (Central Government, Local Government and State Owned Entities) is established.
“By this correspondent we are seeking your assistance in populating the attached template to provide basic information on the various reforms. The PSRU will, through the various Coordination of focal Persons facilitate the full documentation of the reforms once the inventory is established,” the savingram further stated. The copy of the template among others calls on the focal persons to fill out them form under several headings; they include title of reform, start date, reform objectives, reform components, reform components, progress status.
The savingram echoes President Mokgweetsi Masisi’s announcement last year during his state of the nation address that as a nation Botswana has set itself a lofty goal of becoming a high income country by 2036 and has come up with a list of reforms among them digitisation of government infrastructure. He said the path to achieving this goal dictates that, Botswana takes deliberate steps that will transform its institutions; the way Batswana think and the way they act.
“It is with this in mind, that I presented a Reset Agenda in May 2021, with the following priorities: Save Botswana‘s population from COVID-19, by implementing a series of life saving measures that include a successful and timely vaccination programme, Adherence to COVID-19 health protocols remains key and align Botswana Government’s machinery to the Presidential Agenda, to ensure that the national transformation agenda will be embodied in the public service of the day,” said Masisi. He added that, “this will come with significant Government reforms in all public institutions. We need greater agility and responsiveness like never before in the delivery of public services.”
The Presidential COVID-19 Task Force reportedly meddled in the awarding of tenders for COVID-19, a new Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report has revealed.
The Committee expressed concern that it has noted that there are two centres for covid procurement being the Ministry of Health and the Covid Task team in the Office of the President. The report says the Committee questioned the Accounting Officer on why the COVID 19 task team is usurping the powers of the Ministry of Health by engaging in covid procurement when the Ministry of Health is the one which has the experience and mandate of dealing with the pandemic. The report says clarification was also sought on why direct appointment is the preferred method for covid procurement.
“In her response the Accounting Officer stated that the task team was mainly engaged in the procuring of quarantine facilities and was assisting the Ministry of Health due to the heavy workload brought about by the COVID 19 pandemic,” the report says. The report says the Accounting Officer further stated that direct procurement was used because COVID 19 was treated as an emergency and that procurement was mainly from companies that have been traditionally used by the Ministry of Health.
“This however, is not the case as there has been report of new companies being awarded COVID -19 contracts. The use of direct procurement method should only be used in exceptional cases as it’s a non-competitive method which increases the risk of inflated pricing and close relations with particular suppliers to the detriment of others,” the report says.
It says since most covid procurement fell under emergency, there is need for openness and transparency regarding the procurement. The PAC recommended that in order to ensure transparency and accountability all COVID 19 related procurement should be periodically published in the PPADB website giving full details of the companies receiving procurement contracts and the beneficial owners of the companies.
It says with the passage of time the impact of covid is no longer unexpected so direct awards should gradually be abandoned as the medium and long-term needs of the pandemic can now be predicted. “Judgement should be used even during direct awards to ensure that prices are not higher than the market prices,” the report says.
In a related matter, the report says the Central Medical Stores (CMS) was unable to cater for the required quantities of medical supplies with order fulfilments of about 35% resulting in shortages and insufficient drugs to Athlone Hospital and the surrounding clinics. “In his submission the Accounting Officer had indicated that CMS was unable to supply the exact quantities required by the hospital and surrounding clinics due to the fact that supplies from CMS have to be rationed in order to cover other facilities around the country,” says the report.
The committee expressed concern about the inadequate supply of drugs to government facilities which puts the lives of patients at risk due to non- availability of essential supplies. It recommended that the Ministry identifies and prioritise measures that need to be taken to ensure that there is adequate supply of essential medicines which are needed in the public health system.
Meanwhile the report says the Ministry of Health and Wellness coordinates the operations and functions of some institutions which receive government subventions and secondment of staff from the government. These institutions include 10 NGO’s, two mission Hospitals, three mission clinics and two schools of Nursing.
It says in its endeavour to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of government support to NGOs the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development developed some Policy Guidelines for Financial Support to Non- Governmental Organisations. According to the PAC report, the guidelines were meant to ensure that there is consistency, accountability and transparency in administering public funding to NGOs. However, the Ministry of Health did not comply with the very important guidelines.
“The main areas of non-compliance were the following: (i) There was no Evaluation Committee to vet proposals from NGOs, in some instances NGOs had formed part of the evaluation forum when their requests were being considered,” the report says. It says there was continued funding of NGOs even when they failed to submit narrative and financial progress reports; and (iv) Continued funding of NGOs that failed to submit audited financial statements and management letters as required. The Committee expressed concern at the lapses in the administration of grants by the Ministry despite the large sums of public money awarded to these NGOs.
The Kasane Regional Magistrate Court refused this week to rule on whether three Namibians and their Zambian cousin shot dead by members of the Botswana Defence Force (BDF) were in possession of a rifle or not prior to their deaths.
Ruling in favour of the BDF members, Regional Magistrate Taboka Mopipi who presided over the inquest said, “It is acknowledged that no rifle has been produced before court to confirm that indeed the deceased were armed and or that there was indeed a gun shot.” She said the evidence before the court is that search for the rifle(s) that allegedly triggered the gunfire exchange was done by both Namibia and Botswana SCUBA divers and nothing was found. She said when the said search was done, an area of search was demarcated around the scene area which was partly searched due to water animals such as hippos that launched an attack at the area during the search.
“The search was therefore never concluded. This therefore leaves a gap. To that end, the area not extensively searched, the court cannot make a finding whether the rifle in issue was there or not. This is a very crucial piece of evidence,” added Mopipi. She said the joint search did not conclude the exercise and I cannot properly make a finding of fact adding that that the rifle was there as the BDF allege can therefore not be ruled out.
The deceased are Martin Munilweye Nchindo, Ernest Nchindo, Tommy Sinvula Nchindo and Sivula Munyeme. The four deceased persons died on the night of the 5th November 2020, in the waters of the Chobe River (Southern Channel) near Sedudu/Kasikili Island in Botswana. Mopipi said the incident took place at night, in a gloomy atmosphere and that as at the time, movement in that particular area was restricted and or not permitted.
She said it was the evidence of some of the witnesses that the injuries as observed on the four deceased reflected that they were brutally assaulted and or beaten either before or after being shot. “Their evidence gained support from Witness 34, Dr. Bithoma Thotho Amis who observed post mortem on behalf of the families of the deceased and Government of Namibia. This witness however conceded during cross-examination that the injuries as observed have been caused by other contacts and or impacts such as falling and hitting the hard surface of a wooden canoe,” said Mopipi.
She emphasized that inquest proceedings have very serious consequences and therefore, whatever evidence brought before court must be produced by persons of right qualifications particularly the post mortem report which the court has to rely upon. “The qualification of the expert is crucial in determining the credibility of the report. Upon assessment of both experts, I am inclined to adopt the reports from Witness 18, who is a qualified pathologist. A closer look at the other report indicates that the author, Witness 34 is not a qualified pathologist and it is meddled by issues outside an expert opinion,” she said.
Mopipi said reports compiled by a consultant Forensic Pathologist Dr. Kaone Panzirah-Mabaka show the causes of death as follows; Sivula Munyeme, gunshot injury to the chest and extremities, Martin Nchindo, gunshot wound to the abdomen and pelvis, Ernest Nchindo, multiple gunshot injuries to the chest and extremities and Tommy Nchindo, gunshot wound to the chest and abdomen.
“Medical evidence therefore prove conclusively that the four deceased persons died due to gunshots injuries. It is undisputed that the injuries were inflicted by seven (7) members of the Botswana Defence Force; Lieutenant Moreri Kenneth Mphela, Sergeant Ndingisano Nfazo, Sergeant Puisano Pistor Kgokong, Private Mbikiso Tafila, Private Emmanuel Moganetsi Majuta, Private Barulaganyi Rannosang and Private Oromilwe Motlhabi,” said Mopipi.
Mopipi found that there was a gunshot from the direction of the men to the direction of the BDF section. “The BDF members retaliated and returned fire. This was done in accordance with Standard Operation Procedures (SOPs) within the BDF. According to the SOPs, in case a soldier is being fired at, they fire back and do not have to wait for a command,” she said. She added that “The gunfire exchange was brief and after it ceased, they used a torch to light where the men were and established that all the four men were motionless, two in one canoe, one in the other and the other man lying on the edge of the river on the Island.”
She said, “The evidence of the witnesses is that, when they followed the intel, the intent was to conduct an investigation. There was clearly no intent on their part to shoot the deceased, they did that as an act of retaliation.”