The umbrella for local Non-Governmental Organisations, Botswana Council of Non-Governmental Organisations (BOCONGO) has contravened its own constitution by not holding an Annual General Meeting (AGM).
Weekend Post has established that instead of holding the AGM as per the constitutional obligation, the organisation has moved swiftly to conduct a Special or Extraordinary General Meeting that includes AGM agenda in it. As the highest decision making body of the organisation it is provided that the AGM shall be held every year before October.
Article 7.1.2 of the organisation constitution states that “The AGM shall be held between the 1st of May and October 31st of every year at such a place and time as may be determined by the Executive Committee.” In a letter to BOCONGO members dated 1 November 2016, BOCONGO Chairman Oscar Motsumi also concedes that constitutionally the BOCONGO AGM cut-off time is the 31st October 2016.
The Chairman points out in the letter that, since they have missed the deadline for an AGM there will instead be a Special/Extraordinary General Meeting. This is despite the agenda for AGM and that of a Special meeting being dissimilar. According to a BOCONGO member in good standing, Kingston Mmolawa who is the Founder & Executive Director of Food Bank Botswana, item 1, 2, and 3 of the agenda as indicated are AGM business therefore they are “misplaced” and can never be part of the Special Extraordinary General Meeting agenda.
He stated that “should it be left unchanged it will constitute an insult to our collective intelligence as members”. The first three items in the agenda for proposed Special Meeting are; to discuss minutes of the BOCONGO 20th AGM, present audited financial report, as well as present the chairperson and secretariat reports to members – which are normally presented at the normal AGM as the constitution dictates.
The last item on the agenda is presentation and adoption of the final BOCONGO strategic plan and operational plan – which some members feel it is not misplaced. They say the special/extraordinary meetings should discuss such, but insist that it cannot match with AGM agenda.
“I wish to remind you and state that as per the constitution an AGM can never be held outside the stipulated dates as directed by it and its business cannot be discussed in any other meeting besides the AGM. Special /Extra General Meeting deals with urgent matters only and item 1, 2 and 3 as indicated above does not qualify in that category therefore they fall aside,” Mmolawa wrote on behalf of the disgruntled members to the board.
The BOCONGO members further threatened that if their interpretation of the constitution differs then they shall seek the intervention of the courts of law for interpretation. “May I indicate to you that constitutionally the AGM and Special/Extraordinary General Meeting are distinguishable and their mandates are different and clearly explained in the constitution,” the member stressed out to the current board.
In the letter, attention of the board is drawn to Article 7, 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 and Article 7.3 through to 7.3.8 which deals with the business of the AGM. They say the meeting scheduled for 24th of November is a Special Extra General Meeting and has to comply with Article 7.5 read with 7.5.1 through to 184.108.40.206.
Article 7.5.3 states that: “An ordinary or Special General Meeting shall be competent only with particular business of which due notice has been given.” In the letter, Mmolawa says the values of the constitution should be respected by all, even by the Board. “The constitution forms and is fundamentally the Councils chief governs manual. There is disconnection from the constitution because the Councils Leadership do not value the morals of the constitution,” he stated.
However when asked whether it is true BOCONGO is not or has not undertaken the normal Annual General Meeting (AGM), that’s constitutionally held between May and October every year, and reasons thereof, BOCONGO Chairman Oscar Motsumi said it is news to him. “As far as I am concerned, BOCONGO is hosting an Extraordinary Meeting scheduled for November 24th as per Article 7.5 of the BOCONGO Constitution. Please make follow up to the same as I believe you have access to the same. Further, the reasons were communicated to our members and that is what we are working with,” he told Weekend Post on Thursday in a brief response.
Motion of no confidence on BOCONGO board
Some members of BOCONGO are mobilising each other to conduct a separate Special or extraordinary AGM to pass a motion of no confidence on the current board.
In a letter seen by Weekend Post, they state that in light of the one-fifth of the membership of BOCONGO they want the Special AGM to“declare the current board in conflict of its mandate from membership, preceded by motion of no confidence”. They will also discuss and adopt the minutes of the 26th November 2015; resolve on way forward with regards to Sector Terms of reference and sector coordinators functions as well as resolve on the way forward with regards to the Newly Proposed Strategic Plan 2016 to 2019.
The BOCONGO members indicated that information shared with members through the former Executive Director Bagaisi Mabilo has shown gaps in the governing of the organization that members need to urgently address, “lest we have our organization’s reputation publicly smeared”.
They maintain that the information highlights an un-addressed grievance by the former Executive Director dating back to July 2015 detailing a serious governance breach; and the conflict of interest in the awarding of a tender to effect an unauthorized change process as detailed in the minutes of the tender committee shared with members on the 19th August 2016.
“As an institution that coordinated NGOs in Botswana and formed to be a mouth piece of NGOs on various areas including governance of this country, the membership of BOCONGO cannot afford to have a poorly governed or managed organization where the board is not adhering to implementing its mandate as per the direction of the AGM,” they stressed.
They continued to state that members of BOCONGO have not yet sanctioned or approved the new controversial Strategic Plan 2016-2019, while adding that “therefore as members we do not expect any implementation or change management exercise to be taking place through the Secretariat.”
The new Strategic Plan seeks to change the organisation constitution, name, vision and mission, as well as objectives of the umbrella organisation. It has been embraced by some and met with resistance from certain quarters of BOCONGO members, partners and stakeholders.
On their part, BOCONGO board conceded that they are aware of ongoing attempts to get a petition signed that calls on the board to reverse certain decisions. “Indeed, the petition comes short of calling for the entire board to step down,” they confirmed in writing. The board said this call while within the rights of the interests of those working on it, is ill advised and ill-timed especially coming this close to the Special Annual General Meeting (AGM) scheduled for November 24th 2016 where outstanding issues (Relating to the New Strategic Direction) will be thrashed out.
They justified that “it costs close to P100, 000 to host one AGM session and BOCONGO does not have this money.” “Given the cost consciousness and cost containment mind-set of the current Board, during the last AGM we received a clean audit and it is our desire to improve our financial status by exploring other income generating opportunities to ensure organisational sustainability and therefore it makes economic sense to collapse the two Special AGM’s into one to achieve the same results.”
However according to the BOCONGO members the petition was warranted by what they say is visibly an attempt by the Board to shutdown BOCONGO. “If it is not shutting down BOCONGO then who in their right minds will fund an organization that has no regards for laid down processes and procedures. The current state of affairs obtaining at BOCONGO warrants a Special General Meeting,” they stated in the petition.
Amongst other things, the BOCONGO members explained that what was suggested in the meeting was that a neutral person be appointed to investigate what is going on between the board and the Secretariat and that the board makes further consultations with members on the proposed strategic plan.
Further to this, the BOCONGO members highlight that the board has been taking decisions without forming a quorum as it is required by the Constitution. “Therefore, it makes one wonder if resolutions emanating from such an arrangement could be considered legitimate.”
From time immemorial the church was seen as a sacred haven for weary souls and those who need rest from worldly aches and pains. This is even written in the Holy Bible; “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.
Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light,” Matthew 11:28-30.
This being said, anyone would be forgiven to think that the first place to run to would be the church. Time has however changed this.
The atrocities perpetrated by the church and their pastors or those who have been called upon to ‘lead the flock’ have not only distorted their mission, they have caused followers immeasurable pains.
Adorned in the finest regalia in church, the so called men of God are nothing but wolf in sheep’s clothing as they lurk in church corners to prey on the innocent and vulnerable in a place where victims thought was their ‘Father’s house’.
Behind every monster are those who clean up after it and in this case, these are church followers who are alive to the inhumane acts caused by the very men of God whom they have put on pedestals. These followers, more often than not are Elders in the church or those in the revered pastor’s inner circles. These followers would, in an attempt to shield their ‘man of God’, portray the victim as a Jezebel, and shield their pastor and the church’s reputation, forsaking the trauma inflicted upon the victim.
The author of ‘Sex on the Alter’, Kaelo McCoffee was inspired to pen down his book after seeing the endless and unreported incidents that occurred within church walls.
“It’s like a play, a drama based on true stories of how “men of God” abuse women sexually, use them and dump them. Not just that, but it addresses how desperate women are for marriage and relationships, resulting in pain. This is covering ill activities happening in the church,” said McCoffee.
“The purpose of this book is to open someone’s eyes, not just ladies, even guys, that church might be seen or recognised as a good place to be, that might be true yes, but people shouldn’t feel comfortable because they are in church. They should be aware of the dangers that can happen to them in church, like I talked about abuse. I wrote this book to bring awareness, mostly to women because they’re the ones always going through such mostly.”
If one is to look at the grabbling GBV cases within Botswana that occur on a daily basis, one would expect the church to intervene. Not this time around, seeing as how the church is marred with such cases.
“I’ve seen young girls being used because they fell in love with the guy in a nice suit, they get deceived by material things, they get lied to, “I’ll marry you” but after sleeping with them, they leave them, young girls end up reporting cases of rape, yet the truth is they were in love, but because the promises weren’t fulfilled there’s always drama. Some get paid to be silent. I won’t mention anyone by names, but this is what has been happening in many churches, hearts are being broken in the name of the “anointed one”. I’m not saying every man of God, I’m talking about things I know of and I’ve heard happening,” he said.
“And to God it’s an abomination to drag His name into sin and claiming to be righteous, if God has promised in His word that His servants will even face more punishment for diverting His people into wrong doings then they deserve to be punished, they’re humans and they are not even doing what they preach. If the men of God in the Bible got punished for such doings what more of these guys who mess with our sisters.”
In an Interview with WeekendPost, the founder of Epistle of Power International Church (EPIC), Duncan Katse confirmed with this publication that these devious acts are very much present within churches and orchestrated by the so called ‘pastors’.
“It is true and one thing that makes it true is that we have got a lot of pastors who are not really trained in the area of becoming a pastor and there was no discipline instilled. Young ladies also trust their pastors and spiritual mentors with their all; their lives, their bodies. So when these pastors notice that they are highly regarded they can do anything. If there is no alignment in the mentorship, it is easy for the pastor to manipulate the congregants with spiritual things.”
“Some would say ‘God wants us to have our moment alone’, they will start manufacturing funny prophecies to make the person comfortable to relax with them. Sometimes in private spaces, which becomes very dangerous for a young lady. Not all the ladies who go to church have the intension of sleeping with the man of God. Most women do not report these cases because some judge themselves and are afraid to be accused for falsely accusing the man of God,” said Katse.
How women are raped in church
According to close sources, these so called ‘men of God’, threaten young girls after sleeping with them and that they will be cursed should they decide to speak out. Some will be threatened with the infamous line; ‘touch not my anointed.’
“They use their spiritual and prophetic authority to manipulate these women into raping them. There is also an oil called ‘do as I say’ and most of the girls who became victims will tell you, after being raped, they did not know how the rape occurred. Once they apply that oil, whatever they say you are going to do it whether you like it or not. That is why most of these girls are raped and left sick because most of these men of God are sick. They are sick of HIV/AIDS and STI’s. Before raping these women they prepare them emotionally by taking them out for dinners and they end up raping them.”
Botswana Council of Churches responds
“Sexual violence and abuse has been an enormously painful and common feature of our collective past. No sector of society, churches included, has been immune to the problem of sexual violence. It is horrible. Whenever we have seen sexual violence, it has always been an offence to God, and a shattering of God’s good, redemptive hopes for the human story. Sexual abuse is clearly a shattering of God’s intentions for our humanity,” said Bishop Metlha Beleme from Botswana Council of Churches
“When God’s ways are honoured, there is love, because love – the Scriptures tell us – is the very nature and character of God. When you think about it, sexual violence does all the opposite of 1Corinthians 13:4-7, which talks about love. God wants us to experience love. So, apart from the laws of the land, the Church also has Canon law and the Church court for the trial of such offences as Sexual Immorality.”
Beleme further highlighted that; ‘‘there are other healing processes that follow e.g. forgiveness and reconciliation, counselling. Amongst other things we can confess that Church Leaders and Pastors are sinners too, and must be held accountable,” he said.
Maybe when all is said and done, the long arm of the law will forever elude churches as evidenced by the many cases internationally regarding the Catholic church and the cases of paedophilia and child molestation that have been ongoing for years on end. And very rarely in Botswana do pastors face criminal charges in court for sex offenses and that may also be because very few women come forth for fear of being ostracised by both church and society.
Every five years, a cohort of newly elected Members of Parliament (MPs) gather at parliament buildings to take a symbolic oath to assume new role as rarefied individuals who make Botswana’s laws — as prescribed in the constitution — for the good governance of Botswana. Staff Writer ALFRED MASOKOLA observes an abdication of responsibility that has become a new normal in the business of parliament.
Few days before President Sir Ketumile Masire cleared his desk at Office of the President to end an eventful and successful 18 year presidency, his apparent heir, Festus Mogae was reaching out to opposition legislators in a bid to solicit for support for his choice for Vice President.
Since 1997 constitutional amendments, parliament has been mandated with the responsibility of endorsing the Vice President before assuming office.
Mogae was scheduled to ascend to the highest position in the land in wake of series of events in the ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) that made him the only viable candidate. Beleaguered by factions, Mogae could not count on his polarised party.
As many noted, Mogae was relatively a new entrant in the BDP politics. Though he was an accomplished technocrat, he was not a political power horse and was without the charisma that the likes of Daniel Kwelagobe, Ponatshego Kedikilwe and the late Lt General Merafhe had.
Luckily for Mogae, his choice for Vice President was a likeable figure — Lt Gen Ian Khama — and accepted across factional divide, and even more remarkably, by some in opposition ranks. The name was endorsed by all BDP MPs, and the cherry on top; by additional two opposition MPs.
The build-up to this accomplishment however highlighted one major thing that Mogae never took for granted — the legitimate power of MPs.
Even in his presidency, Mogae sought to use parliament caucus for the purpose of achieving consensus rather than imposing his own will. Throughout his presidency, Mogae had to navigate through the hostile factions that kept him on his toes.
In 2003, Mogae in what proved to be naïve, publicly endorsed his Vice President- Khama, in the party chairmanship race against Kedikilwe, the co-leader of what was then known as Kwelagobe/Kedikilwe faction, and later Barataphathi.
Inevitably, Khama won the chairmanship — a development that saw Barataphathi losing control of the Central Committee, for the first time since 1981. With victory in 2003, emerged a rebranded faction called A-Team, led by Merafhe and Jacob Nkate.
The faction will come to dominate both the Central Committee and cabinet after 2004 general elections. Mogae had left out Kwelagobe, Kedikilwe, and GUS Matlhabaphiri out of cabinet after 2004 general elections, inadvertently strengthening the backbench which closed ranks with opposition MPs to subject the executive to scrutiny.
At the height of exercising their power, the backbench blocked and rejected government policies and other pieces of legislation brought before parliament.
By 2006, cabinet found it difficult to pass bills, including the Judges Pension Bill and the crucial intelligence bill which created the DIS in 2007.
Faced with a rigid backbench, Mogae reshuffled his cabinet in 2007 restructuring ministries to accommodate members of rival faction in cabinet. Thereafter, the relationship between cabinet and backbench became cordial.
“I am fully aware that the MPs, both the former ministers, the cabal of some new MPs and the rest of the House, can make and unmake me politically,” Mogae famously said at 2001 BDP Congress in Palapye, as he deliberated on some of the demands brought forward by MPs.
Like anywhere else in democratic dispensations, MPs hold their own and are not pushovers, even in instances where the executive belongs to the same political party that controls the legislative house.
Mogae had accepted that MPs have their own responsibility and that their power was legitimate. Throughout his presidency, his modus operandi was to consult MPs through caucus whenever an important decision was to be made in parliament.
The approach was also the tradition during the presidency of Masire, the founding father of both the BDP and the nation. Masire considered therisanyo paramount prior to any decision making and was described by Mogae during his memorial as, “consultative, collaborative and patient.”
In 2008, things started to change. In recent years, BDP caucus has become increasingly powerful. Unlike in the past, instead of seeking consensus, MPs have been forced to support decisions of the cabinet, even when MPs are not in agreement.
“Caucus has always been there and it is part and parcel of parliament in democracy. Caucus can be flexible depending on leadership. Some issues are allowed conscience debate if caucus cannot reach consensus,” said a high ranking BDP member who served as MP under both Mogae and Khama.
“Mogae was liberal and allowed MPs to use their conscience when there was no consensus. Caucus only became a contentious issue during Khama [Ian] presidency and today.”
In 2011, weeks after civil servants called off strikes that lasted nearly three months, and crippled the economy, then junior minister in the ministry of Local Government, Kentse Rammidi resigned from the cabinet amid a position taken by the party.
In trying to deal with power of civil servants, cabinet brought before parliament a Bill that sought to prevent a number of cadres in the civil service including teachers from participating in industrial action by making them essential service.
Rammidi, who had sympathised with workers during the strike chose to quit the party after BDP caucus forced MPs to support the bill which was to be brought to parliament by then Minister of Labour and Home Affairs, Peter Siele.
The development set had ushered in a new era in the governance of BDP, with the Executive effectively rendering Parliament — which by all intent and purpose is meant to prove checks on it — a rubber stamp.
The BDP caucus effectively derives its mandate from President as the head of executive.
The latest victim of the domineering caucus is Jwaneng-Mabutsane MP, Reggie Reatile.
Two months ago, the maverick MP was slapped with suspension for abstaining instead of voting alongside agreed party caucus positions.
In the build-up to his suspension, Reatile had on numerous occasions voted against the BDP on the Parliament floor. Reatile also abstained when voting was called on the Botswana Defense Force (BDF) Amendment Bill meant to create the position of Judge Advocate General.
Reatile was also the BDP black sheep that voted against Speaker of Parliament, Phandu Skelemani’s decision to suspend Leader of Opposition (LOO) Dumelang Saleshando, from parliament last month.
Prior to Reatile, maverick Ignatius Moswaane, Francistown West legislator, was also suspended. Moswaane has also proved to be a thorn in the flesh of the ruling party as he consistently refused to toe the party line, instead following his conscience.
Moswaane has since resigned from the BDP in favour of Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC).
The insistence on block voting have seen parliament being ultra-polarised, and inadvertently at the expense of the public and good governance.
Despite the country grappled with rising incidence of Gender Based Violence (GBV), the ruling MPs rejected a motion tabled by Mahalapye East MP, Yandani Boko, following a caucus decision.
Boko had tabled a motion on urgency calling for parliament to request President Mokgweetsi Masisi to set-up a Commission of Inquiry on Gender Based Violence (GBV) and other Sexual Offences.
During the BDP caucus, it was agreed that the motion should not be agreed upon, but instead be countered with a suggestion that the duty be referred to an Inter-Ministerial Committee.
Commissions of Inquiry Act empowers the President to set-up a commission and to set its terms of reference.
The motion was however withdrawn by the mover following lack of support from BDP majority.
The rejection of the motion is part of many that have not survived the might of BDP caucus.
In the run-up to 2019 general election, Masisi promised to repeal the infamous Media Practitioners Act passed during his predecessor’s administration. The promise was buttressed in the BDP 2019 election manifesto.
However, when Selibe Phikwe West lawmaker, Dithapelo Keorapetse, brought before parliament the same bill, the ruling party caucus tore it apart. In brief; it was rejected.
The constitution of Botswana, adopted in 1966 following independence, vests legislative powers in parliament. Parliament, through its committees is empowered to provide oversight.
Parliament, indirectly elects the President and also has power to dissolve parliament through a pass of motion of no confidence on government supported by simple majority.
Parliament also approves national spending and also entitled to amend certain provisions of the constitution, save for entrenched provisions.
In giving parliament the legislative duties, the constitution also gives the President the power to ascent to bills passed by parliament or return them to parliament if not satisfied. Nevertheless, if parliament insists on not making any amendments, the President is compelled to ascent to the Bill failing which parliament will lead to the dissolution of parliament, necessitating new elections.
With so much power at its disposal why is parliament abdicating its true responsibility?
The latest edition of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Monitor shows the continuing and devastating impacts of the pandemic on jobs and labour income since early 2020, and the massive disruptions in the labour market that will persist into the fourth quarter of this year.
ILO analysts argue that policymakers will need to maintain support to employment and incomes over the coming months and well into 2021, and to address key challenges.