The high number of deaths from road traffic accidents in the just-ended 2016 festive season has sparked a vigorous debate on the causes of motor vehicle accidents in Botswana and how they can be prevented. In the last two days there has been a column in one newspaper devoted to this, and a major discussion in the breakfast show in Radio Botswana also dealing with the subject.
What is interesting is the wide variety of views regarding the causes, from those who blame the poor standard of driving, due largely to bad attitudes and alcohol and substance abuse, to those who are blaming the state of the roads, especially the potholes. The newspaper columnist suggested a major study on the causes of RTAs. A study could of course range from a major exercise with a longitudinal study taking several years, or could simply be a systematic analysis of raw data that is already in the hands of the police.
While I am not against a study on the causes of RTAs in our country, I believe there are already good pointers at what the problem is. The most challenging thing is to implement preventive measures to drastically reduce both the number of accidents and deaths.
In public health, one of the traditional ways of instituting control measures against a disease is to analyse that disease from the viewpoint of the agent, host and environment.
While this approach was developed largely for communicable diseases, especially vector-borne ones like malaria (the agent being the causative organism, the host being the mosquito and the human being, and the environment being the physical environment and the climate), I have thought of using this model on motor vehicle accidents in Botswana. This would help us to analyse the causes or the possible causes of the disturbingly upward trend in the number of these occurrences.
Therefore, applying the model of the agent, host and environment, I take the human being (the driver and the road user generally) to be the agent, the motor vehicle to be the host, and the road to be the environment. I believe there are elements in all these components that contribute to the occurrence of every accident, the question being which component has the most contributing elements. Let us take them one at a time.
The agent: Driver behaviour is a very major contributor to accidents in Botswana, and to some extent other road users such as pedestrians, cyclists, donkey cart users etc. Firstly, anybody driving a motor vehicle on the road has to be well trained and duly licensed. We know that a large number of drivers on our roads are not well trained, they are simply incompetent. This is probably due to a combination of poor training in driving schools as well as devious ways of obtaining driver’s licenses.
This has also been driven by the explosion in the number of cheap vehicles due to availability of the second hand cars from Asia. It is no longer a requirement to have a valid driver’s license before one can get a loan to buy a car. So many people who buy cars can hardly drive- they are either unlicensed or they have obtained a license without being really competent.
The other problems with the host, the driver, is just simply that Batswana don’t care to obey traffic laws or observe the rules. There is a serious macho problem with our drivers. They go through red traffic lights without thinking twice. They over-speed in the highways, and they overtake under very hazardous circumstances. They have absolutely no courtesy for other road users. They will drive at 50 or 60kph in a major highway like the A1 and not bother that they are followed by kilometres-long chains of vehicles, even where there is enough road shoulder to go into and let others pass.
Over-speeding by buses and other Public Service Vehicles is a problem, especially in the A1 and other major roads. A bus with “100” written on it overtakes a vehicle travelling at 120kph and that is routine in the A1. Lastly driving under the influence of alcohol (or other substances?) is virtually routine in our roads.
It is so common that, the only way the Police can really prove it is to do a blood test on every driver who is involved in an accident, not just for punishment, but also to obtain statistics on the contribution of alcohol to accidents. It is not unusual to hear the Alcohol Industry saying only 6% of accidents are due to alcohol. This cannot be true, because those tested for alcohol after accidents are highly selected, at the discretion of the police attending to the accident.
So, to conclude about the agent, I believe the human factor is a very major, in my opinion, the major cause of accidents on our roads. One has just to look at the deaths caused by head-on collisions in the last few months to appreciate this point. The host: For the purposes of this article I will take the vehicle to be the host.
The most serious road traffic accidents are actually related to motor vehicles. So how do our motor vehicles contribute to road accidents, when we standardize for the human factor? Firstly, we have had an explosion in the number of motor vehicles on our roads. Were our road designed with these numbers in mind? Secondly, there are many defective vehicles on our roads that should not be there; what is the contribution of the second hand cars from Asia? Something obviously should be done to control vehicles that are not road-worthy on our roads.
The environment: The road is our most important environment in this topic. During the Radio Botswana programme referred to in the first paragraph of this write-up, I indicated that many callers complained about the state of our roads, especially the potholes, although some mentioned they are narrow, vegetation on the side is not controlled etc. I was rather surprised that few, if any, mentioned the livestock on our roads.
It is my belief that indeed the things mentioned above are a problem. The Roads Department and the Local Authorities have to ensure that roads are properly maintained and that potholes are timely repaired etc. The government, Central and Local, has to deal with the livestock problem once and for all; one can’t help but feel that there is lack of political will to deal with it because the owners of these animals are voters! Adequate negative sanctions could reduce the problem. Also, instead of spending large amounts of money on so-called animal patrols which are running vehicles, it might be worthwhile to consider employing watchmen and putting them at gates on major highways.
In view of the above, I would suggest some measures that could reduce accidents:
Relating to the agent, the driver:
Ensure all drivers are properly licensed
Deal with loopholes that allow unqualified or incompetent drivers to get licences, e.g. corruption
Deal harshly with drivers who are not licensed
Deal very harshly with those driving under the influence
Find ways of policing and catching those breaking traffic laws with impunity- going through red lights, overtaking in wrong places etc.
Control over-speeding, with special attention on buses and mini buses in major highways
Mount a systematic, road safety education campaign for drivers, but extend it to other road users and stakeholders.
Relating to the host, the vehicle:
Refine ways of determining road-worthiness of vehicles, both at licensing and during checks on the road
Eliminate the corruption factor in this regard- vehicles that are not roadworthy are routinely given certificates!
Control imports of second-hand cars: e.g. in some countries they do not allow imports of vehicles older than 5 years or with odometer readings of more than 100,000 km.
The environment, the road:
Improve maintenance or roads, with special emphasis on potholes
Set up a road fund (if it is not already there), financed with fuel levies and motor vehicle licencing, and use the fund for the intended purpose
Consider making the whole of the A1 into a dual carriageway; since resources are limited this could be done incrementally, starting with the busiest parts as is already being done. This is my contribution to this debate as a citizen. Certainly something drastic needs to be done to reduce deaths, disabilities and suffering from road traffic accidents.
US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has violated the One-China policy, and caused the escalation of tensions across the Taiwan Strait. Experts and political observers across the spectra agree that Pelosi’s actions and subsequent pronouncements by US President Joe Biden gave impetus to an already simmering tension in the Taiwan Strait, provoking China to strengthen its legitimate hold on the Taiwan Strait waters, which the US and Taiwan deem as ‘international waters’.
Pelosi’s visit to China’s Taiwan region has been heavily criticised across the globe, with China arguing that this is a serious violation of the one-China principle and the provisions of the three China-US Joint Communiqués. In response to this reckless move which seriously undermined China’s sovereignty, and interfered in China’s internal affairs, the expectation is for China to give a firm response. Pelosi visit violated the commitments made by the U.S. side, and seriously jeopardized peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.
To give context to China’s position over Taiwan region, the history behind gives us perspective. It is also important to note that the history between China and Taiwan is well documented and the US has always recognized it.
The People’s Republic of China recognises Taiwan as its territory. It has always been the case even before the Nationalist Republic of China government fled to the previously Japanese-ruled Island after losing the civil war on the mainland in 1949. According to literature that threat was contained for decades — first with a military alliance between the US and the ROC on Taiwan, and after Washington switched diplomatic recognition to the PRC in 1979 by the US One China policy, which acknowledges Beijing’s position that Taiwan is part of One China. Effectively, Taiwan’s administration was transferred to the Republic of China from Japan after the Second World War in 1945, along with the split between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) as a consequence of the Chinese Civil War. Disregarding this history, as the US is attempting to do, will surely initiate some defence reaction on the side of China to affirm its sovereignty.
However, this history was undermined since Taiwan claimed to democratise in the 1990s and China has grown ever more belligerent. Furthermore, it is well documented that the Biden administration, following the Trump presidency, has made subtle changes in the way it deals with Taipei, such as loosening restrictions on US officials meeting Taiwanese officials – this should make China uneasy. And while the White House continues to say it does not support Taiwanese independence, Biden’s words and actions are parallel to this pledge because he has warned China that the US would intervene militarily if China attacked Taiwan – another statement that has provoked China.
Pelosi, in her private space, would know that her actions amount to provocation of China. This act of aggression by the USA seriously undermines the virtues of sovereignty and territorial integrity which has a huge potential to destabilize not only the Taiwan Strait but the whole of the Asia- Pacific region. The Americans know very well that their provocative behavior is deliberately invoking the spirit of separatism masqueraded as “Taiwan independence”. The US is misled to think that by supporting separatism of Taiwan from China that would give them an edge over China in a geopolitics. This is what one Chinese diplomat said this week: “The critical point is if every country put their One-China policy into practice with sincerity, with no compromise, is going to guarantee the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.” Therefore, it was in the wake of US House speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, that China, in a natural response revealed plans for unprecedented military exercises near the island, prompting fears of a crisis in the Taiwan Strait and the entire Asia-Pacific region. The world community must promote and foster peace, this may be achieved when international laws are respected. It may also happen when nations respect the sovereignty of another. China may be in a better space because it is well capacitated to stake its territorial integrity, what about a small nation, if this happens to it?
As to why military exercises by Beijing; it is an expected response because China was provoked by the actions of Pelosi. To fortify this position, Chinese President, Xi signed a legal basis for China’s People’s Liberation Army to “safeguard China’s national sovereignty, security and development interests”. The legal basis will also allow military missions around disaster relief, humanitarian aid and peacekeeping. In addition the legal changes would allow troops to “prevent spillover effects of regional instabilities from affecting China, secure vital transport routes for strategic materials like oil, or safeguard China’s overseas investments, projects and personnel. It then follows that President Xi’s administration cannot afford to look weak under a US provocation. President Xi must protector China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, of which Taiwan is a central part.” Beijing is very clear on One-China Policy, and expects all world players to recognize and respect it.
The People’s Liberation Army has made it clear that it has firepower that covers all of Taiwan, and it can strike wherever it wants. This sentiments have been attributed to Zhang Junshe, a researcher at the PLA Navy Research Institute. Zheng further said, “We got really close to Taiwan. We encircled Taiwan. And we demonstrated that we can effectively stop intervention by foreign forces.” This is a strong reaction from China to warn the US against provocation and violation of the One-China Policy.
Beijing’s military exercises will certainly shake Taiwan’s confidence in the sources of its economic and political survival. The potential for an effective blockade threatens the air and shipping routes that support Taiwan’s central role in global technology supply chains. Should a humanitarian situation arise in Taiwan, the blame would squarely be on the US.
As China’s military exercises along the Taiwan Strait progress and grow, it remains that the decision by Nancy Pelosi to visit China’s Taiwan region gravely undermined peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and sent a wrong signal to “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. This then speaks to international conventions, as the UN Secretary-General António Guterres explicitly stressed that the UN remains committed to the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758. The centerpiece is the one-China principle, namely, there is but one China in the world, the government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China, and Taiwan is a part of China. It must be noted that the US and the US-led NATO countries have selectively applied international law, this has been going on unabated. There is a plethora of actions that have collapsed several states after they were attacked under the pretext of the so-called possession of weapons of mass destruction illuminating them as threats – and sometimes even without any valid reason. to blatantly launch military strikes and even unleash wars on sovereign countrie
British novelist, W. Somerset Maugham once opined: “If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.”
The truism in these words cannot be underestimated, especially when contextualizing against the political developments in Botswana. We have become a nation that does not value democracy, yet nothing represent freedom more than democracy. In fact, we desire, and value winning power or clinging to power more than anything else, even if it harms the democratic credentials of our political institutions. This is happening across political parties — ruling and opposition.
As far as democracy is concerned, we are regressing. We are becoming worse-off than we were in the past. If not arrested, Botswana will lose its status as among few democratic nations in the Africa. Ironically, Botswana was the first country in Africa to embrace democracy, and has held elections every five years without fail since independence.
We were once viewed as the shining example of Africa. Those accolades are not worth it any more. Young democracies such as South Africa, with strong institutions, deserves to be exalted. Botswana has lost faith in democracy, and we will pay a price for it. It is a slippery slope to dictatorship, which will bring among other excess, assault on civil liberties and human rights violations.
Former President, Festus Mogae once stated that Botswana’s democracy will only become authentic, when a different party, other than the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) wins elections, and when the President of such party is not from Serowe.
Although many may not publicly care to admit, Mogae’s assertion is true. BDP has over the years projected itself as a dyed-in-the-wool proponent of democracy, but the moment its stay in power became threatened and uncertain, it started behaving in a manner that is at variance with democratic values. This has been happening over the years now, and the situation is getting worse by the day.
Recently, the BDP party leadership has been preaching compromise and consensus candidates for 2024 general elections. Essentially, the leadership has lost faith in the Bulela Ditswe dispensation, which has been used to selected party candidates for council and parliament since 2003. The leadership is discouraging democracy because they believe primary elections threaten party unity. It is a strange assertion indeed.
Bulela Ditswe was an enrichment of internal party democracy in the sense that it replaced the previous method of selection of candidates known as Committee of 18, in which a branch committee made of 18 people endorsed the representatives. While it is true that political contest can divide, the ruling party should be investing in political education and strengthening in its primary elections processes. Democracy does not come cheap or easy, but it is valuable.
Any unity that we desire so much at the expense of democracy is not true unity. Like W. Somerset Maugham said, democracy would be lost in the process, and ultimately, even the unity that was desired would eventually be lost too. Any solution that sacrifice democracy would not bring any results in the long run, except misery.
We have seen that also in opposition ranks. The Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) recently indicated that its incumbent Members of Parliament (MPs) should not be challenged for their seats. While BDP is sacrificing democracy to stay in power, UDC is sacrificing democracy to win power. It is a scary reality given the fact that both parties – ruling and opposition — have embraced this position and believe democracy is the hindrance to their political ambitions.
These current reality points to one thing; our political parties have lost faith in democracy. They desire power more than, the purpose of power itself. It is also a crisis of leadership across the political divide, where we have seen dissenting views being met with persecution. We have seen perverting of political process endorsed by those in echelons of power to manipulate political outcomes in their favour.
Democracy should not be optional, it should be mandatory. Any leader proposing curtailing of democracy should be viewed with suspicion, and his adventures should be rejected before it is too late. Members of political parties, as subscribers of democracy, should collectively rise to the occasion to save their democracy from self-interest that is becoming prevalent among Botswana political parties.
The so-called compromise candidates, only benefits the leadership because it creates comforts for them. But for members, and for the nation, it is causing damage by reversing the gains that have been made over the years. We should reject leaders who only preach democracy in word, but are hesitant to practice it.
Piracy of all kinds continues to have a massive impact on the global creative industry and the economies of the countries where it thrives.
One of the biggest misconceptions around piracy is that an individual consumer’s piracy activities, especially in a market the size of Botswana’s, is only a drop in the pool of potential losses to the different sectors of the economy piracy affects.
When someone sitting in Gaborone, Botswana logs onto an illegal site to download King Richard online, they don’t imagine that their one download will do anything to the production house’s pocket or make a dent in the actors’ net worth. At best, the sensitivity towards this illegal pirating activity likely only exists when contemplating going about pirating a local musician’s music or a short film produced locally.
The ripple effects of piracy at whatever scale reach far beyond what the average consumer could ever imagine. Figures released by software security and media technology company, Irdeto, show that users in five major African territories made approximately 17,4 million total visits to the top 10 identified piracy sites on the internet.
The economic impact of this on the creative industry alone soars to between 40 and 97.1 billion dollars, according a 2022 Dataprot study. In addition, they estimate that “illegally streamed copyrighted content consumes 24% of global bandwidth”.
As Botswana’s creative industry remains relatively slight on the scale of comparison to industries such as Nollywood and Nilewood where the creative industry contributes a huge proportion to West and East Africa’s respective GDPs, that does not imply that piracy activities in Botswana do not have a similar impact on our economy and the ability of our creative industry to grow.
When individuals make decisions to illegally consume content via internet streaming sites they believe they are saving money for themselves in the name of enjoying content they desire to consume. Although this is a personal choice that remains the prerogative of the consumer, looking beyond the fact that streaming on illegal content sites is piracy, the ripple effect of this decision also has an endless trail of impact where funds which could be used to grow the local creative industry through increased consumption, and revenue which would otherwise be fed back into Botswana’s economy are being diverted.
“Why can’t our local creative industry grow?” “Why don’t we see more home-grown films and shows in Botswana?” are questions constantly posed by those who consume television content in Botswana. The answer to this lies largely in the fact that Botswana’s local content needs an audience in order for it to grow. It needs support from government and entities which are in a position to fund and help the industry scale greater heights.
Any organisational body willing to support and grow the local creative industry needs to exist and operate in an economy which can support its mandates. Content piracy is a cycle that can only be alleviated when consumers make wiser decisions around what they consume and how.
This goes beyond eradicating piracy activities in so far as television content is concerned. This extends to the importation and trade in counterfeit goods, resale of goods and services not intended for resale across the border, outside its jurisdiction, and more. All of these activities stunt the growth of an economy and make it nearly impossible for industries and sectors to propel themselves to places where they can positively impact society and reinvest into the country’s economy.
So what can be done to turn the tide here in Botswana in order to see our local production houses gain the momentum required to produce more, license more and expand their horizons? While those who enforce the law continue to work towards minimizing piracy activities, it’s imperative that as consumers we work to make their efforts easier by being mindful of how our individual actions play a role in preventing the success of our local creative networks and our economy’s growth.
Whether you are pirating a Hollywood Blockbuster, illegally streaming a popular Motswana artist’s music, or smuggling in an illegal decoder to view content restricted to South Africa only, your actions have an impact on how we as a nation will make our mark on the global landscape with local creative productions. Thembi Legwaila is Corporate Affairs Manager, MultiChoice Botswana