Two of the most prominent members of Botswana Democratic Party (BDP)’s old factions; A-Team and Barataphathi, Jacob Nkate and Botsalo Ntuane, are set for a battle that is likely to rekindle the factional wars that the duo once engaged in at the height of the BDP polarisation.
WeekendPost can authoritatively reveal that the former A-Team faction leader, Nkate, wrote to the party secretariat this week indicating his interest to contest the position of secretary general at the upcoming July congress, a position which Ntuane wishes to retain. The party chairman, Mokgweetsi Masisi, has coaxed the former BDP secretary general to not contest with him for the party chairmanship, but instead tackle the incumbent secretary general for the position. In a shrewd political move, Masisi has managed to ward off one contestant and further consolidate his power ahead of the congress. Masisi will automatically become president when Khama leaves office at the end of March next year.
Masisi/Nkate teaming up also vindicates the down played indications that the chairman has never favoured the presence of Ntuane in the BDP central committee. Masisi is said to be one of the key opponents of Ntuane’s electoral and political reforms. Nkate who spent a majority of his youthful years in BDP ranks, including serving in the youth league, is known for his robust and outspoken character. During his time as MP, he found himself leading a factional battle on the side of President Lt Gen Ian Khama.
After losing his seat to the opposition, Botswana Congress Party (BCP), in the 2009 general elections, he was appointed BEDIA (now Botswana Investment Trade Centre (BITC), Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Subsequent to his controversial departure from the CEO post in 2012, Khama blessed him with an ambassadorial post.
When he announced that he would be running for the party chairmanship earlier last month, after returning from his ambassadorial role in Japan, Nkate had also stated that he was willing to take the secretary general’s seat if circumstances do not allow him to go after his first preference.
Nkate and Ntuane both had the privilege of serving the party’s central committee during their youthful years. Ntuane was elected an additional member of BDP’s Central Committee in 1995 after the Mogoditshane Congress. At 24 years, he became the youngest BDP member to be elected into the central committee.
Meanwhile Nkate became a member of the BDP Central Committee by virtue of his position as youth league leader between 1996 and 98. Nkate rose through the echelons of power in the BDP during the resurgence of A-Team; also known as Nkate-Merafhe faction in 2003 when he deposed Pelonomi Venson-Moitoi of Barataphathi from the position of the deputy secretary general, becoming Daniel Kwelagobe’s understudy until 2007.
In 2005 at the Serowe Congress, Kwelagobe’s protégée Ntuane decided to take Nkate head on, in another factional fight bout. With the backing of Khama, who was then party chairman, Nkate retained his seat. Two years later, when Kwelagobe willingly gave up the secretary general position after serving for 27 uninterrupted years Nkate moved on to contest the position where he faced Gomolemo Motswaledi of the rival Barataphathi faction. Nkate emerged from the battle as a winner though with a margin of 49.
Nkate and Ntuane were key players in the events leading to the 2009 Kanye Congress and eventually to the splitting of the party in 2010. Though the duo was not necessarily contesting for any central committee position, they became arch- rivals when they threw their weight behind their respective factions. Barataphathi, determined to reclaim control of the party structures refused suggestions by the central committee to allow the then sitting members to be returned to their posts unchallenged.
Ntuane’s political mentor, Kwelagobe, was on the receiving end of Nkate’s diatribe including in newspapers and broadcast interviews. At the end of the congress, the Nkate/Merafhe faction lost against to the indomitable Kedikilwe/Kwelagobe faction. The victory of the Barataphathi at Kanye set in motion events which led to the splitting of the party and formation of Botswana Movement for Democracy (BMD), of which Ntuane was among the founders.
Ntuane, has chosen ‘not to comment’ on the decision by Nkate to challenge him for the throne. Ntuane, who will be completing his term in July, has earlier stated that he will announce his decision of whether to defend his position or not after the party National Council in April this year. In a brief interview with this publication, Nkate remarked that he is not joining the secretary general race to fight anyone but to make a contribution to the party.
“In politics there is an expression which says there are no permanent friends and enemies, and there is also an expression which says even two days is a long time,” he said. “Circumstances have changed as compared to when we were going to Kanye. Some of the people you are talking about are no longer in the picture.” Nkate said he has never had personal hatred against anyone including Kwelagobe.
A former BDP member, who was at the centre of events ahead of the Kanye Congress, has told this publication that a lot of things have changed since 2009 and that voting patterns at BDP are no longer what they used to be in the past. “BDP has learnt from the Kanye aftermath. You could see that a lot of things have changed. The way in which they voted at Mmadinare [2015 Congress] is the same way they are going to vote. No more voting based on factional divide,” he said.
The source further indicated that the A-Team and Barataphathi factions are non-existent in the current BDP at the moment, if anything, he said, it will be new factions. Since Kanye, apart from the split, there have been major changes in the politics of BDP. Both Ponatshego Kedikilwe and Mompati Merafhe, who were factional leaders then, are no longer in the picture, with the former having retired and the latter having passed on.
Here is how one Permanent Secretary encapsulates the clear tension between democracy and bureaucracy in Botswana: “President Mokgweetsi Masisi’s Government is behaving like a state surrounded with armed forces in order to capture it or force its surrender. The situation has turned so volatile, for tomorrow is not guaranteed for us top civil servants.
These are the painful results of a personalized civil service in our view as permanent secretaries”. Although his deduction of the situation may be summed as sour grapes because he is one of the ‘victims’ of the reshuffle, he is convinced this is a perfect description of the rationale behind frequent changes and transfers characterising the current civil service.
The result of it all, he said, is that “there is too much instability at managerial and strategic levels of the civil service leading to a noticeable directionless civil service.” He continued: “Changes and transfers are inevitable in the civil service, but to a permissible scale and frequency. Think of soccer team coach who changes and transfers his entire squad every month; you know the consequences?”
The Tsunami has hit hard at critical departments and Ministries leaving a strong wave of uncertainty, many demoralised and some jobless. In traditional approaches to public administration, democracy gives the goals; and bureaucracy delivers the technical efficiency required for implementation. But the recent moves in the civil service are indicative of conflicting imperatives – the notion of separation between politicians and administrators is becoming blurred by the day.
“Look at what happened to Prisons and BDF where second in command were overlooked for outsiders, and these are the people who had sacrificially served for donkey’s years hoping for a seat at the ladder’s end. The frequency of the changes, at times affecting the same Ministry or individual also demonstrates some level of ineptitude, clumsiness and lack of foresight from those in charge,” remarked the PS who added that their view is that the transfers are not related to anything but “settling scores, creating corruption opportunities and pushing out perceived dissident and former president, Ian Khama’s alleged loyalists and most of these transfers are said to be products of intelligence detection.”
Partly blaming Khama for the mess and his unwillingness to let go, the PS dismissed Masisi for falling to the trap and failing to outgrow the destructive tiff. “Khama is here to stay and the sooner Masisi comes to terms with the fact that he (Masisi) is the state President, the better. For a President to still be making these changes and transfers signals signs of a confused man who has not yet started rolling his roadmap, if at all it was ever there. I am saying this because any roadmap comes with key players and policies,” he concluded.
The Ministry of Health and Wellness seems to be the most hard-hit by the transfers, having experienced three Permanent Secretaries changes within a year and a half. Insiders say the changes have everything to do with the Ministry being the centre of COVID-19 tenders and economic opportunities. “The buck stops with the PS and no right-thinking PS can just allow glaring corruption under his watch as an accounting officer. Technocrats are generally law abiding, the pressure comes with politically appointed leaders racing against political terms to loot,” revealed a director in the Ministry preferring anonymity.
The latest transfer of Kabelo Ebineng she says was also motivated by his firm attitude against the President’s blue-eyed Task Team boys. “The Task Team wants to own the COVID-19 pandemic and government interventions and always cry foul when the Ministry reasserts itself as mandated by law,” said the director who added that Masisi who was always caught between the crossfire decided on sacrificing Ebineng to the joy of his team as they (Task Team) were in the habit of threatening to resign citing Ebineng as the problem.
Ebineng joins the Office of the President as a deputy Coordinator (government implementation and coordination office).The incoming PS is the soft-spoken Grace Muzila, known and described by her close associates as a conformist albeit knowledgeable.
One of the losers in the grand scheme is Thato Raphaka who many had seen as the next PSP because of his experience and calm demeanour following a declaration of interest in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Secretary post by the current PSP, Elias Magosi.
But hardly ten months into his post, Raphaka has been transferred out to the National Strategy Office in what many see as a demotion of some sort. Other notable changes coming into OP are Pearl Ramokoka formerly with the Employment, Labour and Productivity Ministry coming in as a Permanent Secretary and Kgomotso Abi as director of Public Service Reforms.
One of the ousted senior officers in the Office of the President warned that there are no signs that the changes and transfers will stop anytime soon: “If you are observant you would have long noticed that the changes don’t only affect senior officers but government decisions as well. A decision is made today and the government backtracks on it within a week. Not only that, the President says this today, and his deputy denies it the following day in Parliament,” he warned.
Some observers have blamed the turmoil in the civil service partly to lack of accountable presidential advisers or kitchen cabinet properly schooled on matters of statecraft. They point out that politicians or those peripheral to them should refrain from hampering the technical and organizational activities of public managers – or else the party (reshuffling) won’t stop.
In the view expressed by some Permanent Secretaries, Elias Magosi, has not really been himself since joining the civil service; and has cut a picture of indifference in most critical engagements; the most notable been a permanent secretaries platform which he chairs. As things stand there is need to reconcile the imperatives of democracy and democracy in Botswana. Peace will rein only when public value should stand astride the fault that runs between politicians and public managers.
Former Permanent Secretary to the President, Carter Morupisi, is fighting for survival in a matter in which the State has charged him and his wife, Pinnie Morupisi, with corruption and money laundering.
Morupisi has joined a list of prominent figures that served in the previous administration and who have been accused of corruption during their tenure in office. While others have been emerging victorious, Morupisi is yet to find that luck. The High Court recently dismissed his no case to answer application.
United States President, Joe Biden, is faced with a decision to make relating to the Covid-19 vaccine intellectual property after 175 former world leaders and Nobel laurates joined the campaign urging the US to take “urgent action” to suspend intellectual property rights for Covid-19 vaccines to help boost global inoculation rates.
According to the world leaders, doing so would allow developing countries to make their own copies of the vaccines that have been developed by pharmaceutical companies without fear of being sued for intellectual property infringements.
“A WTO waiver is a vital and necessary step to bringing an end to this pandemic. It must be combined with ensuring vaccine know-how and technology is shared openly,” the signatories, comprising more than 100 Nobel prize-winners and over 70 former world leaders, wrote in a letter to US President Joe Biden, according to Financial Times.
A measure to allow countries to temporarily override patent rights for Covid related medical products was proposed at the World Trade Organization by India and South Africa in October, and has since been backed by nearly 60 countries.
Former leaders who signed the letter included Gordon Brown, former UK Prime Minister; François Hollande, former French President; Mikhail Gorbachev, former President of the USSR; and Yves Leterme, former Belgian Prime Minister.
In their official communication, South Africa and India said: “As new diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines for Covid-19 are developed, there are significant concerns [about] how these will be made available promptly, in sufficient quantities and at affordable prices to meet global demand.”
While developed countries have been able to secure enough vaccine to inoculate their citizens, developing countries such as Botswana are struggling to source enough to swiftly vaccine their citizens, something which world leaders believe it would work against global recovery therefore proving counter-productive.
Since the availability of vaccines, Botswana has been able to secure only 60 000 doses of vaccines, 30 000 as donation as from the Indian government, while the other 30 000 was sourced through COVAX facility. Canada, has pre-ordered vaccines in surplus and it will be able to vaccinate each of its citizens six times over. In the UK and US, it is four vaccines per person; and two each in the EU and Australia.
For vaccines produced in Europe, developing countries are forced to pay double what European countries are paying, making it more expensive for already financially struggling economies. European countries however justify the price of vaccines and that they deserve to buy them cheap since they contributed in their development.
It is evident that vaccines cannot be made available immediately to all countries worldwide with wealthy economies being the only success story in that regard, something that has been referred to as a “catastrophic moral failure”, head of the World Health Organisation (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
The challenge facing developing countries is not only the price, but also the capacity of vaccine manufactures to be able to do so to meet global demand within a short time. The proposal for a patent waiver by India and South Africa has been rejected by developed countries, known for hosting the world leading pharmaceutical companies such US, European Union, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.
According to the Financial Times, US business groups including pharmaceutical industry representatives, have urged Biden to resist supporting a waiver to IP rules at the WTO, arguing that the proposal led by India and South Africa was too “vague” and “broad”.
The individuals who signed the letter, including Nobel laureates in economics as well as from across the arts and sciences, warned that inequitable vaccine access would impact the global economy and prevent it from recovering.
“The world saw unprecedented development of safe and effective vaccines, in major part thanks to US public investment,” the group wrote. “We all welcome that vaccination rollout in the US and many wealthier countries is bringing hope to their citizens.”
“Yet for the majority of the world that same hope is yet to be seen. New waves of suffering are now rising across the globe. Our global economy cannot rebuild if it remains vulnerable to this virus.” The group warned that fully enforcing IP was “self-defeating for the US” as it hindered global vaccination efforts. “Given artificial global supply shortages, the US economy already risks losing $1.3tn in gross domestic product this year.”