SELEBI PHIKWE: In what seems to be a lack of understanding of the guidelines, the Local Authority here has approved very strange names for the streets, roads and public facilities.
Selebi Phikwe Town Council (SPTC) on Thursday told the media that all streets, roads, public facilities and areas within its jurisdiction that are named after people will carry their work titles to indicate right away in what capacity is the person being honoured. Here, an area, road, street or public facility named after a teacher, its name will have to reflect that the person was a teacher. An example is an industrial area in Botshabelo location which has been named ‘Councillor Tidimane,’ named after the late Michael Tidimane, one of the renowned councillors for that area. This will be the pattern in Selebi Phikwe which is inconsistent with the rest of the country. Unique but strange.
Lazarus Kolanyane, SPTC’s Chief Physical Planner says this arrangement is as per the Local Government Act, No. 18 of 2012 which has informed the formulation of guidelines that Local Authorities around the country use for the naming exercise. However, this particular item of prefixing the names with occupational titles is not stipulated in the very same guidelines that the council has used for this purpose. Kolanyane is nevertheless adamant that their arrangement is guided by the national guidelines notwithstanding the fact that this strange prefixing is not expressly stipulated on the said guidelines.
The draft National Guidelines on Naming of Streets, Roads and Public Facilities of 2014 that the council has used, provide general guidance on the procedures to be followed in the naming exercise by the Local Authorities. It is stipulated in the guidelines that “in naming the streets and public facilities, the Local Authorities shall ensure that the guidelines are followed in order to achieve consistency throughout the country.”
As it stands, if SPTC execute its naming and re-naming project in its current form, the national consistency will not be achieved as Selebi Phikwe will be different from all other areas in the country. The guidelines regulates and standardizes the processes associated with the naming and re-naming and it informs and influences the types of names that are chosen from various features as well as spell out the procedure that should be followed in the naming and re-naming process. But Selebi Phikwe dares to be different.
The Director of Local Government Development Planning, Tshepo Mophuting has however dismissed SPTC’s prefixing arrangement as inconsistent with the guidelines which are binding and must be followed by all local authorities undertaking the naming or re-naming exercise. He explained that the use of people’s names is recognised as being a way of honouring certain individuals for their contribution to the development of the country, their towns or districts.
Mophuting further explained that the issue of why a particular individual is chosen only come as reasons motivating why the person has to be honoured but not explicitly coming out as part of the name. He stressed that the naming must be aligned with accepted planning procedures and current trends.
Meanwhile, Mophuting has also explained the reason why Botswana still continue to honour the dead instead of the living even though the law permits that people still alive can also have streets, roads and public facilities named after them. He says the discomfort lies in that people who are still alive may in one way or the other cause damage to their illustrious reputations in the course of their remaining lives thus tarnishing their honour.
However, former president of South Africa, the late Nelson Mandela has streets and roads named after him here in Botswana, an honour that he received while he was still alive. The Director says only in exceptional circumstances will the names of living persons be given consideration. Without explaining the circumstances, he said here at home the late Julia Molefe was also honoured while she was still alive. Block 9 clinic in Gaborone was named Julia Molefe Clinic and she enjoyed the honour while she still lived. In the rare event that the names of living persons are considered, the names shall only be sanctioned by the Minister of Local Government and Rural Development.
Botswana has made improvements on preventing and ending arbitrary deprivation of liberty, but significant challenges remain in further developing and implementing a legal framework, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention said at the end of a visit recently.
Head of the delegation, Elina Steinerte, appreciated the transparency of Botswana for opening her doors to them. Having had full and unimpeded access and visited 19 places of deprivation of liberty and confidentiality interviewing over 100 persons deprived of their liberty.
She mentioned “We commend Botswana for its openness in inviting the Working Group to conduct this visit which is the first visit of the Working Group to the Southern African region in over a decade. This is a further extension of the commitment to uphold international human rights obligations undertaken by Botswana through its ratification of international human rights treaties.”
Another good act Botswana has been praised for is the remission of sentences. Steinerte echoed that the Prisons Act grants remission of one third of the sentence to anyone who has been imprisoned for more than one month unless the person has been sentenced to life imprisonment or detained at the President’s Pleasure or if the remission would result in the discharge of any prisoner before serving a term of imprisonment of one month.
On the other side; The Group received testimonies about the police using excessive force, including beatings, electrocution, and suffocation of suspects to extract confessions. Of which when the suspects raised the matter with the magistrates, medical examinations would be ordered but often not carried out and the consideration of cases would proceed.
“The Group recall that any such treatment may amount to torture and ill-treatment absolutely prohibited in international law and also lead to arbitrary detention. Judicial authorities must ensure that the Government has met its obligation of demonstrating that confessions were given without coercion, including through any direct or indirect physical or undue psychological pressure. Judges should consider inadmissible any statement obtained through torture or ill-treatment and should order prompt and effective investigations into such allegations,” said Steinerte.
One of the group’s main concern was the DIS held suspects for over 48 hours for interviews. Established under the Intelligence and Security Service Act, the Directorate of Intelligence and Security (DIS) has powers to arrest with or without a warrant.
The group said the “DIS usually requests individuals to come in for an interview and has no powers to detain anyone beyond 48 hours; any overnight detention would take place in regular police stations.”
The Group was able to visit the DIS facilities in Sebele and received numerous testimonies from persons who have been taken there for interviewing, making it evident that individuals can be detained in the facility even if the detention does not last more than few hours.
Moreover, while arrest without a warrant is permissible only when there is a reasonable suspicion of a crime being committed, the evidence received indicates that arrests without a warrant are a rule rather than an exception, in contravention to article 9 of the Covenant.
Even short periods of detention constitute deprivation of liberty when a person is not free to leave at will and in all those instances when safeguards against arbitrary detention are violated, also such short periods may amount to arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
The group also learned of instances when persons were taken to DIS for interviewing without being given the possibility to notify their next of kin and that while individuals are allowed to consult their lawyers prior to being interviewed, lawyers are not allowed to be present during the interviews.
The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention mentioned they will continue engaging in the constructive dialogue with the Government of Botswana over the following months while they determine their final conclusions in relation to the country visit.
Standard Chartered Bank Botswana (SCBB) has informed the government that it will not be accepting new loan applications for the Government Employees Motor Vehicle and Residential Property Advance Scheme (GEMVAS and LAMVAS) facility.
This emerges in a correspondence between Acting Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Finance Boniface Mphetlhe and some government departments. In a letter he wrote recently to government departments informing them of the decision, Mphetlhe indicated that the Ministry received a request from the Bank to consider reviewing GEMVAS and LAMVAS agreement.
He said: “In summary SCBB requested the following; Government should consider reviewing GEMVAS and LAMVAS interest rate from prime plus 0.5% to prime plus 2%.” The Bank indicated that the review should be both for existing GEMVAS and LAMVAS clients and potential customers going forward.
Mphetlhe said the Bank informed the Ministry that the current GEMVAS and LAMVAS interest rate structure results into them making losses, “as the cost of loa disbursements is higher that their end collections.”
He said it also requested that the loan tenure for the residential property loans to be increased from 20 to 25 years and the loan tenure for new motor vehicles loans to be increased from 60 months to 72 months.
Mphetlhe indicated that the Bank’s request has been duly forwarded to the Directorate of Public Service Management for consideration, since GEMVAS and LAMVAS is a Condition of Service Scheme. He saidthe Bank did also inform the Ministry that if the matter is not resolved by the 6th June, 2022, they would cease receipt of new GEMVAS and LAMVAS loan applications.
“A follow up virtual meeting was held to discuss their resolution and SCB did confirm that they will not be accepting any new loans from GEMVAS and LAMVAS. The decision includes top-up advances,” said Mphetlhe. He advised civil servants to consider applying for loans from other banks.
In a letter addressed to the Ministry, SCBB Chief Executive Officer Mpho Masupe informed theministry that, “Reference is made to your letter dated 18th March 2022 wherein the Ministry had indicated that feedback to our proposal on the above subject is being sought.”
In thesame letter dated 10 May 2022, Masupe stated that the Bank was requesting for an update on the Ministry’s engagements with the relevant stakeholder (Directorate of Public Service Management) and provide an indicative timeline for conclusion.
He said the “SCBB informs the Ministry of its intention to cease issuance of new loans to applicants from 6th June 2022 in absence of any feedback on the matter and closure of the discussions between the two parties.” Previously, Masupe had also had requested the Ministry to consider a review of clause 3 of the agreement which speaks to the interest rate charged on the facilities.
Masupe indicated in the letter dated 21 December 2021 that although all the Banks in the market had signed a similar agreement, subject to amendments that each may have requested. “We would like to suggest that our review be considered individually as opposed to being an industry position as we are cognisant of the requirements of section 25 of the Competition Act of 2018 which discourages fixing of pricing set for consumers,” he said.
He added that,“In this way,clients would still have the opportunity to shop around for more favourable pricing and the other Banks, may if they wish to, similarly, individually approach your office for a review of their pricing to the extent that they deem suitable for their respective organisations.”
Masupe also stated that: “On the issue of our request for the revision of the Interest Rate, we kindly request for an increase from the current rate of prime plus 0.5% to prime plus 2%, with no other increases during the loan period.” The Bank CEO said the rationale for the request to review pricing is due to the current construct of the GEMVAS scheme which is currently structured in a way that is resulting in the Bank making a loss.
“The greater part of the GEMVAS portfolio is the mortgage boo which constitutes 40% of the Bank’s total mortgage portfolio,” said Masupe. He saidthe losses that the Bank is incurring are as a result of the legacy pricing of prime plus 0% as the 1995 agreement which a slight increase in the August 2018 agreement to prime plus 0.5%.
“With this pricing, the GEMVAS portfolio has not been profitable to the Bank, causing distress and impeding its ability to continue to support government employees to buy houses and cars. The portfolio is currently priced at 5.25%,” he said. Masupe said the performance of both the GEMVAS home loan and auto loan portfolios in terms of profitability have become unsustainable for the Bank.
Healso said, when the agreement was signed in August 2018, the prime lending rate was 6.75% which made the pricing in effect at the time sufficient from a profitable perspective. “It has since dropped by a total 1.5%. The funds that are loaned to customers are sourced at a high rate, which now leaves the Bank with marginal profits on the portfolio before factoring in other operational expenses associated with administration of the scheme and after sales care of the portfolio,” said the CEO.