Alindo Engineering and General Maintenance (Pty) Ltd is a very lucky company indeed. The company keeps on getting jobs with the Department of Technical Services (DTS) but the company rarely ever complete jobs. In the last three years they have been given jobs to the tune of P78 million and only one of the four projects the company was awarded is near completion.
Alindo Engineering is owned by aspiring Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) treasurer. The project completion for the projects stands at 25% (two years overdue for completion) – 90% (two years overdue for completion) – 3.5% (behind schedule by seven months) – and 100 % (final report yet to be handed over).
Pressure from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has forced the DTS to instruct government lawyers to demand over P6 million owed to Government from the first project. Two other projects have also been red flagged for termination because of poor implementation albeit he has been paid million as part payment for the undelivered projects. According to records, Alindo Engineering keeps on getting jobs despite its record of failing to deliver projects.
The 25% progress after three years
He was given a job for the construction of 4No. Double Storey 4 units staff houses for Maiteko Junior secondary School at the tune of P18 894 333. 47 on 31 March 2014 and he was expected to complete the projected on 05-01-2015 and later date was revised to 19-01-2015. The project as things stand is still at 25 percent completion despite the fact that he has already been paid P8 933, 077.59.
Explaining the back and forth, DTS writes: “The contractor abandoned the project since September 2015 to date. He owes the Government P6, 188, 884.01 which accrued from rejected works and unpaid mobilization. On 2nd May 2017 DTS wrote to the contractor to state how he is going to pay the Government the money he is due to pay. He wrote back on 26th May 2017 stating that the money will be paid by a proposed assignee.
The mobilization was waived to stabilise the contractor’s cash flow problems with a hope the contractor will complete the project. This decision was guided by FIDIC, (The International Federation of Consulting Engineers) clause 3.5 which state that “the conditions provide that the Engineer shall proceed to agree or determine any matter, the Engineer shall consult with each party in an endeavor to reach agreement. If agreement is not achieved, the Engineer shall make a fair determination in accordance with the contract, taking due regard of all relevant circumstances.” Attorney General’s Chambers will be contacted to assist in recovering the money owed.
The only completed project
Alindo Engineering and General Maintenance Pty Ltd also worked on the construction of staff houses at Marakanelo JSS at Ncojane. The contract sum is P10, 714, 659.20 and the contractor was paid P5, 077, 897.25. The project was awarded on 10th April 2014 and was expected to be completed on 05 December 2014 but the completion date was later revised to 25 March 2015. While the status of the project is that it has been completed, the briefing notes indicate that the final account for the project will be concluded and finalized in the second quarter of 2017/2018.
Stuck at 90% progress for four years!
On the 11th November 2013, he was given a project to refurbish the Curriculum Development Building, in Gaborone at the tune of P5, 932, 710.93 and he was paid P5, 422, 627.67. He was to complete the project on 28 April 2014 and the project completion date was revised to 30 August 2016. Today the project progress stands at 90 percent completion.
This is howDTS explains this situation: “The contractor is struggling to complete the contract. He was a written a letter of Notice to terminate on 4th July 2015 which he replied on 9th July 2015 by opting for mutual termination. He was invited for a meeting on 31 August 2015 to discuss mutual termination but never attended or replied the invitation letter.
On 6th April 2017 he was written a letter of Notice to Terminate and replied on 26th April 2017, he further wrote on 23 May 2017 requesting for inspection and subsequent handover of the project. On the 13th June 2017 DTS team visited the project for final inspection, but on arrival on site they noticed that contractor did not finish the works. He further pleaded that he will complete by end of June 2017. After June 2017 if the work is not complete, contract will be terminated.”
Shocking 3.5% progress in six months
On 1st December 2016 the same contractor was awarded a job to construct 9No 2beds Double Storey and 2No LA3 staff houses for Moeding College at Otse at the value of P43, 000, 062. 71 and was paid P6, 945, 543.55. The expected completion date for the project is 31st December 2017 and at the moment the project is at 3.5 percent completion.
And the DTS explanation: “DTS wrote a letter on 15th May 2017 requesting to meet the Contractor and Client (Moeding Colege) on the 22nd May 2017 top discuss poor progress of the project. After holding the meeting on 22nd May 2017 Moeding Colege wrote to the contractor requesting for recovery plan or catch up plan from the contractor. On the 9th June 2017 the contractor wrote proposing to subcontract works. On the 13th June 2017 DTS responded seeking clarity pertaining to the contractor’s proposal.
On the 14th June 2017 DTS team visited the site and observed that the progress on site is still at 3.5 percent. DTS has visited the site again and still found that the progress is still at 3.5 percent. This poor performance of the contractor has been referred to the UCCSA Board of Governors so that appropriate action on contractual obligations and possible act on non-performance by the contractor.”
Botswana Police Service (BPS) has indicated concern about the ongoing trend where the general public falls victim to criminals purporting to be police officers.
According to BPS Assistant Commissioner, Dipheko Motube, the criminals target individuals at shopping malls and Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) where upon approaching the unsuspecting individual the criminals would pretend to have picked a substantial amount of money and they would make a proposal to the victims that the money is counted and shared in an isolated place.
“On the way, as they stop at the isolated place, they would start to count and sharing of the money, a criminal syndicate claiming to be Criminal Investigation Department (CID) officer investigating a case of stolen money will approach them,” said Motube in a statement.
The Commissioner indicated that the fake police officers would instruct the victims to hand over all the cash they have in their possession, including bank cards and Personal Identification Number (PIN), the perpetrators would then proceed to withdraw money from the victim’s bank account.
Motube also revealed that they are also investigating a case in which a 69 year old Motswana woman from Molepolole- who is a victim of the scam- lost over P62 000 last week Friday to the said perpetrators.
“The Criminal syndicate introduced themselves as CID officers investigating a case of robbery where a man accompanying the woman was the suspect.’’
They subsequently went to the woman’s place and took cash amounting to over P12 000 and further swindled amount of P50 000 from the woman’s bank account under the pretext of the further investigations.
In addition, Motube said they are currently investigating the matter and therefore warned the public to be vigilant of such characters and further reminds the public that no police officer would ask for bank cards and PINs during the investigations.
Botswana Congress Party (BCP) leadership walked out of Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting this week on account of being targeted by other cooperating partners.
UDC meet for the first time since 2020 after previous futile attempts, but the meeting turned into a circus after other members of the executive pushed for BCP to explain its role in media statements that disparate either UDC and/or contracting parties.
The Director General of the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crimes (DCEC), Tymon Katlholo’s spirited fight against the contentious transfers of his management team has forced the Office of the President to rescind the controversial decision. However, some insiders suggest that the reversal of the transfers may have left some interested parties with bruised egos and nursing red wounds.
The transfers were seen by observers as a badly calculated move to emasculate the DCEC which is seen as defiant against certain objectionable objectives by certain law enforcement agencies – who are proven decisionists with very little regard for the law and principle.