Imagine: 2% of American population is Jewish, yet this minority constitutes 40% of that country’s billionaires; globally Jews make-up less than 1% of the population but they surprisingly make up 25% of the world’s billionaires. With a population well below half of Zimbabwe’s population, Israel’s G.D.P runs into $300 billion. And every aspiring American President, in this American-run world, must first obtain the approval of the Jewish community.
Waal! Jews indirectly rule the world! They really own the magic wand for success!? One plus one Jew is equal to three. Of course, this is not a mathematical error but a synergy. It is equally true to say, mathematically speaking, any number to the power zero will always be one. Impliedly, a wholesale number of useless people added in order to re-enforce a weakling may not produce desired results. Also consider the following syllogism and deductive reasoning: All Jews are rich. Sam Lev is a Jew. Sam Lev must therefore be stinking rich. The above statistics and comments, plus many more, which are too many to mention, speak volumes about Jewish successes.
This topic has already been explored by this writer elsewhere in the article entitled ‘What Lessons Could Africans Draw from the Jews Regarding Success? ‘That is on line but it was just a skeletal presentation. First and foremost, unlike us Africans, Jews have a positive mindset and attitude .These traits or attributes are not innate but result from socialization. The bible is a good socializing agent. And, despite some protestations to the contrary, it (BIBLE) is a history of the Jews, that is their origins, conquests and national purity as God‘s chosen people.
Could there be anything more motivating to someone, morale boosting, than the mere knowledge that he comes from a good background? God is portrayed as a property of this 'special racial syndicate' and surprisingly ,killed other people ,the Arabs, who are also a product of His own creation ,in order to advance Israelis interests .He only temporarily abandoned them because they had strayed from His Commandments.
Of course, this favoritism is all nonsense but simply betrays the interests of the writers who were themselves mostly Jewish, save for a few like Luke, but influenced by the already circulating literature that was meant to entrench, inter alia, patriarchy and Judaism. There is no way a writer can distance his interests from his own writings and this helps to account for the Synoptic Problem in the New Testament.
Be that as it may, this glorious history has greatly inspired the Jews. Resultantly, they have always tried to maintain the high standards of excellence as portrayed in the Bible. As can be seen, Jews have great role models, in the bible, to emulate from. This then influences their mindsets and then attitude towards success. On the other hand, Africans have been portrayed as backward ‘cursed sons of Ham ‘who bear the stigma of Noah‘s Curse' (Genesis 9:20-27). And, according to Exodus 20:5, the sins of the fathers are visited onto the children unto the fourth generation! As such, Africans have been condemned into ‘hewers of wood and drawers of water ‘to toil for the sons of Sham and Japheth, goes the argument. This message (Hamitic hypothesis) is hardly encouraging at all, it dampens our morale, and it in turn influences the African‘s mindset and devil-may –care attitude towards success, life and himself! In Psychology they call this phenomenon the labeling theory. It is also associated with the self-fulfilling prophecy. We have also always been taught that behind every successful Black person is a White Skin.
It is because of this neo -colonial mind that most Africans, including the late Wacko Jacko, have an identity crisis and are not sure whether they are Black or White. Do you still remember the touchy xenophobic attacks on foreigners by Pretoria? Ironically those of foreign origins in South Africa‘s definition are the fellow black brothers while those of White extraction went unscathed. Ironically speaking again, the South African nationals bore the brunt of Apartheid atrocities at the hands of the Boers, the very people whom they prefer to their Black brothers .It is hardly surprising, therefore, that Boer statues have been erected on virtually every inch of the country, yet not even a single one of a Negro hero is in sight. If this is not an identity crisis what is it? Pretoria has deliberately forgotten the role played by Frontline States, SADC and AU towards the attainment of her independence.
On the contrary, Jews are known for their racial pride and identity and have, as a result, been portrayed as the worst in terms of racism, overtaking the Germans and Boers in this regard. Which is why they rarely institute intermarriages and, as much as possible, still shun a social intercourse with other races. Indeed it is this nationalism or ethnocentric inertia, coupled with their successes, which forced nationals in the countries hosting the Jews to persecute them.
Given the negative presentation or portrayal of Blacks in the so-called Holy Book ,men of God must interpret the Biblical Old Testament in such a way that it portrays God 's impartial nature .Having the bible re-written, as proposed by the late professor Banana of Zimbabwe, would not be the best way out but ,instead , let us customize or Africanize its interpretation .The interpretation should be done in such a way that it is adapted to cater for our needs and context in as much the same way as Synoptic Gospels were presented in a fashion that takes due regard the different audiences ,timescontexts ,needs and other variables. We should be seeing the Black Jesus and Moses, alike, in the bible, also, for example.
Additionally, success is a part and parcel of Jews ‘culture and from a tender age this value is fostered into them. Poverty is to them a form of deviance. Jews are taught that the secret of success lies in owning the country‘s economy. This secret, they have mastered and hence tend to monopolize the economies of not only their own countries, but even foreign lands as well. That is why, through this financial muscle, they indirectly rule the world .Sadly, Africans do the opposite. They do not even own their own economies.
Another contributory factor for the Jews ' s success is that in the Diaspora most of them were subjected to harsh or inhuman treatment, not only in Egypt during Moses ‘s time ,but everywhere else in the Diaspora. And Hitler is on record of having butchered about six million Jews (the holocaust)! That condition did not limit their potential. Instead, in this kind of environment, they had to learn survival skills in order to defy extinction. In so doing, they became not only dare-devils, but initiative enough to defeat life‘s challenges. With these acquired skills, the Jews can survive in any environment, no matter how unfriendly it is.
These powers and or culture of endurance had already developed when the Israelites were made to wonder for forty years, instead of forty days, in the wilderness of Mesopotamia by 'God’, and in this harsh environment they met challenges of various forms. It is in this context that one can remark that challenges are a necessary evil because they provoke the best reactive response out of a challenged individual. These responses, in turn, generate inner strivings which are geared towards meeting the demands of the challenge .In the process one develops. Africans needed to have employed or adopted this approach from the atrocities suffered at the hands of Whites during the Slave Trade, Colonial and Neo-colonial periods. Such experiences should have schooled us about, first, the values of unity, necessitated by the fear of a common enemy, the oppressor, and; secondly, the need to combine our effort in developing our societies.
While Africans, just like the Shakespearean arrant defeatist or coward ,who tends to die many times before his actual death(in his imagination) ,do have the flight instinct of readily taking to heels without the slightest endeavor to stand their ground, the brave and resilient Jew would adopt the pugnacious spirit to seek to conquer. Resilience is the ability to recover from misfortune. One must not only endure a difficult circumstance but also look at a seeming obstacle and see an opportunity in it. Stay tuned till we meet and finish this series next week.
This is a question that should seriously exercise the mind of every Botswana citizen and every science researcher, every health worker and every political leader political.
The Covid-19 currently defines our lives and poses a direct threat to every aspect and every part of national safety, security and general well-being. This disease has become a normative part of human life throughout the world.
The first part of the struggle against the murderous depredation of this disease was to protect personal life through restrictive health injunctions and protocols; the worst possibly being human isolation and masks that hid our sorrows and lamentations through thin veils. We suffered that humiliation with grace and I believe as a nation we did a great job.
Now the vaccines are here, ushering us into the second phase of this war against the plague; and we are asking ourselves, is this science-driven fight against Covid-19 spell the end of pandemic anxiety? Is the health nightmare coming to an end? What happy lives lie ahead? Is this the time for celebration or caution? As the Non State Actors, we have being struggling with these questions for months.
We have published our thoughts and feelings, and our research reviews and thorough reading of both the local and international impacts of this rampaging viral invasion in local newspapers and social media platforms.
More significantly, we have successfully organised workshops about the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy and the last workshop invited a panel of health experts, professionals, and public administers to advance this social dialogue as part of our commitment to the tripartite engagement we enjoy working with Government of Botswana, Civil Society and Development partners. These workshops are virtual and open to all Batswana, foreign diplomatic missions based in Gaborone, UN agencies located in Gaborone and international academic researchers and professional health experts and specialists.
The mark of Covid-19 on our nation is a painful one, a tragedy shared by the entire human race, but still a contextually painful experience. Our response is fraught with grave difficulties; limited resources, limited time, and the urgency to not only save lives but also avert economic ruin and a bleak future for all who survive. Several vaccines are already in the market.
Parts of the world are already doing the best they can to trunk the pestilential march of this disease by rolling out mass-vaccinations campaigns that promise to evict this health menace and nightmare from their public lives. Botswana, like much of Africa, is still up in the disreputable, and, unenviable, preventative social melee of masked interactions, metered distances, contactless commerce.
We remain very much at the mercy of a marauding virus that daily runs amuck with earth shattering implications for the economy and human lives. And the battle against both infections and transmissions is proving to be difficult, in terms of finance, institutional capacities and resource mobilization. How are we prepared as government, and as citizens, to embrace the impending mass-vaccinations? What are the chances of us succeeding at this last-ditch effort to defeat the virus? What are the most pressing obstacles?
Does the work of vaccines spell an end to the pandemic anxieties?
Our panellists addressed the current state of mass-vaccination preparedness at the Botswana national level. What resources are available? What are the financial, institutional and administrative operational challenges (costs and supply chains, delivery, distribution, administering the vaccine on time, surveillance and security of vaccines?) What is being done to overcome them, or what can be done to overcome them? What do public assessments of preparedness tell us at the local community levels? How strong is the political will and direction? How long can we expect the whole exercise to last? At what point should we start seeing tangible results of the mass-vaccination campaign?
They also addressed the challenges of the anticipated emerging Vaccinated Society. How to fight the myths of vaccines and the superstitions about histories of human immunizations? What exactly is being done to grow robust local confidence in the science of vaccinations and the vaccines themselves? More significantly, how to square these campaigns vis-vis personal rights, moral/religious obligations?
What messages are being sent out in these regards and how are Batswana responding? What about issues of justice and equality? Will we get the necessary vaccines to everyone who wants them? What is being done to ensure no deserving person is left behind?
They also addressed issues of health data. To accomplish this mass-vaccination campaign and do everything right we need accurate and complete data. Poor data already makes it very hard to just cope with the disease. What is being done to improve data for the mass-vaccination campaign? How is this data being collected, aggregated and prepared for real life situation/applications throughout Botswana in the coming campaign?
We know in America, for example, general reporting and treatment of health data at the beginning of vaccinations was so poor, so chaotic and so scattered mainstream newspapers like The Atlantic, Washington Post and the New York Times had to step in, working very closely with civil society organizations, to rescue the situation. What data-related issues are still problematic in Botswana?
To be specific, what kind of Covid-19 data is being taken now to ready the whole country for an effective and efficient mass-vaccination program?
Batswana must be made aware that the end part of vaccination will just mark the beginning of a long journey to health recovery and national redemption; that in many ways Covid-19 vaccination is just another step toward the many efforts in abeyance to fight this health pandemic, the road ahead is still long and painful.
For this purpose, and to highlight the significance of this observation we tasked our panellists with the arduous imperative of analysing the impact of mass-vaccination on society and the economy alongside the pressing issues of post-Covid-19 national health surveillance and rehabilitation programs.
Research suggests the aftermath of Covid-19 vaccination is going to be just as difficult and uncertain world as the present reality in many ways, and that caution should prevail over celebration, at least for a long time. The disease itself is projected to linger around for some time after all these mass-vaccination campaigns unless an effort is made to vaccinate everyone to the last reported case, every nation succeeds beyond herd immunity, and cure is found for Covid-19 disease. Many people are going to continue in need of medications, psychological and psychiatric services and therapy.
Is Botswana ready for this long holdout? If not, what path should we take going into the future? The Second concern is , are we going to have a single, trusted national agency charged with the mandate to set standards for our national health data system, now that we know how real bad pandemics can be, and the value of data in quickly responding to them and mitigating impact? Finally, what is being done to curate a short history of this pandemic? A national museum of health and medicine or a Public Health Institute in Botswana is overdue.
If we are to create strong sets of data policies and data quality standards for fighting future health pandemics it is critical that they find ideological and moral foundations in the artistic imagery and photography of the present human experience…context is essential to fighting such diseases, and to be prepared we must learn from every tragic health incident.
Our panellists answered most of these questions with distinguished intellectual clarity. We wish Batswana to join us in our second Mass-vaccination workshop.
Today is International Women’s Day – it’s a moment to think about how much better our news diet could be if inequities were eliminated. In 1995, when the curtains fell in one of the largest meetings that have ever brought women together to discuss women in development, it was noted that women and media remain key to development.
Twenty-six years later, the relevant “Article J” of the Beijing Platform for Action, remains unfulfilled. Its two strategic objectives with regard to Women and Media have not been met. They are Increase the participation and access of women to expression and decision-making in and through the media and new technologies of communication
Promote a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media.
Today, as we mark International Women’s Day, it’s an indictment on both media owners and civil society that women remain on the periphery of news-making. They cannot claim equal space in either the structures of newsrooms or in the content produced, be that as sources of news or as the subjects of reports. Indeed, the latest figures from WAN-IFRA’s Women in News Programme show just one in five voices in news belong to women*, be they as sources, as the author or as the main character of the news report.
Some progress was evident several years back, with stand-out women being named as chief executive officers, editors in chief, managing editors and executive editors. But these gains appear short lived in most media organisations. Excitement has turned to frustration as one-step forward has been replaced with three steps backwards. In Africa, the problem is acute. The decision-making tables of media organisations remain deprived of women and where there are women, they are surrounded by men.
Few women have followed in the footsteps of Esther Kamweru, the first woman managing editor in Kenya, and indeed sub-Saharan Africa. Today’s standout women editors include Pamela Makotsi-Sittoni (Nation Media Group, Kenya), Barbara Kaija (New Vision, Uganda), Mary Mbewe (Daily Nation, Zambia), Margaret Vuchiri (The Monitor, Uganda), Joyce Shebe (Clouds, Tanzania), Tryphinah Dongwana (Weekend Post, Botswana), Joyce Mhaville (Independent Television -ITV, Tanzania) and Tuma Abdallah (Standard Newspapers,Tanzania). But they remain an exception.
The lack of balance between women and men at the table of decision making has a rollback effect on the content that is produced. A table dominated by men typically makes decisions that benefit men.
So today, International Women’s Day is a grim reminder that things are not rosy in the news business. Achieving gender balance in news and in the structure of media organisations remains a challenge. Unmet, it sees more than half of the population in our countries suffer the consequences of bias, discrimination and sexism.
The business of ignoring the other half of the population can no longer be treated as normal. It’s time that media leaders grasp the challenge, not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it also makes a whole lot of business sense: start covering women, give them space and a voice in news-making and propel them to all levels of decision making within your organisation.
We can no longer afford to imagine that it’s only men who make and sell the news and bring in the shillings to fund the media business. Women too are worthy newsmakers. In all of our societies, there are women holding decision making positions and who are now experts in once male-only domains such as engineers, doctors, scientists and researchers.
They can be deliberately picked out to share their perspectives and expertise and bring balance to the profile of experts quoted on our news pages. Media is the prism through which society sees itself and women are an untapped audience. So, as we celebrate International Women’s Day, let us embrace diversity, which yields better news content and business products, and in so doing eliminate sexism. We know that actions and attitudes that discriminate against people based on their gender is bad for business.
As media, the challenge is ours. We need to consciously embrace and reach the commitments made 26 years ago when the Beijing Platform for Action was signed globally. As the news consuming public, you have a role to play too. Hold your news organization to account and make sure they deliver balanced news that reflects the voices of all of society.
Jane Godia is a gender development and media expert who serves as the Africa Director of Women in News programme. WOMEN IN NEWS is WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org
The eve of International Women’s Day presents an opportunity for us to think about gender equality and the long and often frustrating march toward societies that are truly equal.
As media, we are uniquely placed to drive forward this reflection and discussion. But while focusing on the challenges of gender in society, we owe it to our staff and the communities we serve to also take a hard look at the obstacles within our own organisations.
I’m talking specifically about the scourge of sexual harassment. It’s likely to have happened in your newsroom. It has likely happened to a member of your team. It happens to all genders but is disproportionately directed at women. It happens in every industry, regardless of country, culture or context. This is because sexual harassment is driven by power, not sex. Wherever you have imbalances in power, you have individuals who are at risk of sexual harassment, and those who abuse this power.
I’ve been sexually harassed. The many journalists and editors, friends and family members who I have spoken to over the years on this subject have also been harassed. Yet it is still hard for leaders to recognize that this could be happening within their newsrooms and boardrooms. Why does it continue to be such a taboo?
Counting the cost of sexual harassment
Sexual harassment is, simply put, bad for business. It can harm your corporate reputation. It is a drain on the productivity of staff and managers. Maintaining and building trust in your brand is an absolute imperative for media organisations globally. If and when a case gets out of control or is badly handled – this can directly impact your bottom line.
It is for this reason that WAN-IFRA Women in News has put eliminating sexual harassment as a top priority in our work around gender equality in the media sector. This might seem at odds with the current climate where social interactions are fewer and remote work scenarios are in place in many newsrooms and businesses. But one only needs to tune into the news to know that the abuse of power, manifested as verbal, physical or online harassment, is alive and well.
Preliminary results from an ongoing Women in News research study into the issue of sexual harassment polling hundreds of journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia indicate that more than 1 in 3 women media professionals have been physically harassed, and just under 50% have been verbally harassed. Just over 15% of men in African newsrooms reported being physically harassed, and slightly less than 1 in 4 reports being verbally harassed. The numbers for male media professionals in Southeast Asia are slightly higher than a quarter on both forms of harassment.
The first step in confronting sexual harassment is to talk about it. We need to strip away the stigma and discomfort around having open conversations about what sexual harassment is and isn’t. Media managers, it is entirely in your power to create dynamics in your own teams that are free from sexual harassment.
Publishers and CEOs, you set the organisational culture in your media company.
By being vocal in recognising that it happens everywhere, and communicating to your employees that you will not tolerate sexual harassment of any kind, you send a powerful message to your teams, and publicly. With these actions, you will help us overcome the legacy of silence around this topic, and in doing so take an important first step to create media environments that truly embrace equality.
Melanie Walker is Executive Director of Media Development of the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). She is a creator of Women in News, WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org