Connect with us
Advertisement

Augustine rips into toothless Ombudsman

With just a year into the office, Ombudsman Augustine Makgonatsotlhe is already firing shots at his office and calling for rigorous transformation.

In an exclusive interview with WeekendPost this week the Ombudsman fired from the hip, saying that the office was in dire need of transformation; has to be given more powers; more resources and most importantly it should be given space to be totally independent.

 

“In an ideal situation, an institution of this nature (Ombudsman) should be completely independent; and that means legally independent, operationally independent, and even in terms of budgets, it should be divorced from the executive; so that at the end of the day they get the budget from parliament and also report directly to parliament with no connections to the executive,” Makgonatsotlhe pointed out.

He continued: “you know at the moment we are not completely independent. We are only independent in as far as operations or investigations of cases are concerned. Otherwise we rely on public service for everything including personnel, resources so to the extent that in other peoples’ eyes we are completely not independent,” the Ombudsman told WeekendPost. He also pointed out that the country is still confined to the “classical ombudsman” model which only makes recommendations which are not binding.

“I make recommendations in terms of our Ombudsman Act and that is not binding unlike in other countries like South Africa where it is very clear in their constitution that the decisions of the Public Protector are binding.” He added that in that case you cannot ignore them; it is either you comply or when you are dissatisfied with the decision you have to go to court and ask for judicial review.  “That’s why in Botswana people say the ombudsman is a toothless bulldog,” he lashed out.

The distinguished qualified legal practitioner also highlighted that the office of the Ombudsman being directly linked with the executive takes away its credibility. He said the office can therefore not be accredited to other international respected bodies like the United Nations body for human rights. A number of countries he said have adopted the modern model of the office of Ombudsman being South Africa, Namibia, Lesotho, Kenya, Tanzania, and Ghana.

 

The modern model gives the ombudsman more powers and multiple mandates that are not only confined to maladministration like it is in Botswana. “Personally, my belief is that we should go that route. But I am not the one to change the law. It is parliament with its wisdom to decide to change the law. They can move to that.”

Makgonatsotlhe met Thuli Madonsela to benchmark

Makgonatsotlhe is left with only three years of the four year contract awarded him by President Lt. Gen. Seretse Khama Ian Khama. He says he is still settling in the office and part of that being him visiting South Africa’s ex Public Protector, Thuli Madonsela.
“I had the opportunity to go to her office and see how they do their investigations. They are not terribly different from the way we are doing our investigations because the Ombudsman and the Public Protector are similar in a way, even though in South Africa they have a bigger mandate than we have in Botswana.”

He said he also managed to see how they interact with other governance institutions like human rights commission as all these institutions are established under chapter 9 of South African constitution. The institutions, he said, are specifically mandated to strengthen the constitutional democracy of South Africa. Makgonatsotlhe said that in South Africa, the Public Protector just investigate maladministration but also investigates corruption and issues of unethical conduct of leadership under the Executive Members Ethics Act which empowers him/her to investigate any unethical conduct done by any member of the executive.

“The thing with them is that they don’t have a Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC) like we have in Botswana; they only deal with a Public Protector.” While he said Botswana has a human rights commission housed under the office of the ombudsman, Makgonatsotlhe cautioned that in an ideal situation a human rights commission has to be a standalone, like in South Africa. “This has created problems in many countries because if you have many mandates its highly likely that one will suffer.”

The issue of his recommendation of Btv biasness

In relation to the report he recently released after carrying out investigations on behalf of Botswana National Front Vice President Prince Dibeela, he says he believes he carried the matter fairly and professionally in terms of the law. He justified his recommendation which stated that Btv was biased against opposition parties in favour of ruling Botswana Democratic Party saying his office investigates all complaints as long as the ombudsman has a jurisdiction on them.  “And we do that with no fear or favour. That is the job. I mean it must be done appropriately as we have been assigned to do.”

When asked if it is not likely that the political leadership may feel hard done by his recommendations, and maybe have a problem with it he said “then it is not our problem. It doesn’t bother me at all. For as long as my conscience is clear on the matter. I would have done what I was supposed to do.” The long serving Public Servants also emphasized that it gives logic that decisions or recommendations of the ombudsman should be binding so that the body is taken seriously.

 

“We should ensure that when it has taken the decision, those decisions are complied with; if it doesn’t it will be as if those decisions were never made. The office should be strengthened to have more meaning to Batswana and make an impact in the governance and administration of the country.”


He added: “The authorities can decide to comply or not as it stands. Like what I said before that’s where really the problem is, they are not forced to comply by the law.”

However he still believes that the ombudsman has moral authority. So for the fact that they have created the office, it is logical also that whatever the decision it comes with should be complied with or else that will have a negative effect on the governance of the country. He continued: “Notwithstanding, if there is no compliance, what should happen is that, the ombudsman should do a special report on that same matter which he has to submit to parliament to tell them I have done this, I came to this conclusion and I made this recommendations but there has been no compliance. Then it will be up to parliament to see what to do.”  

Makgonatsotlhe on DCEC, IEC, Auditor General, Parliament

Makgonatsotlhe also says he wants to see the strengthening of all governance institutions particularly Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC), Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), the Auditor General and Parliament.
He said these are institutions that to him are very critical to strengthening democracy and governance. “When we have those institutions in a way that spill off when things are not running properly the economy will grow because investors will come and they will be sure of their investments. The rule of law will flourish when proper governance is there. The investors want to go to a place which is very safe and properly run and they are sure that they are protected and their investments are also protected that is my parting shot,” he said.

Meanwhile Leader of opposition and Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) President Duma Boko has repeatedly criticized the Ombudsman together with DCEC, IEC, Directorate on Intelligence and Security Services (DISS) saying in their current form they are useless and therefore call for totally disbanding and overhauling that may be effected when his party takes office.

 

The office of the Ombudsman came into existence around December 1997 after the law establishing the office was promulgated in 1995 and later assented by the then President Sir Ketumile Masire who is now late. The late Lethebe Amos Maine was the country’s first ombudsman and the second was Ofentse Lepodise (also late) while the third was Festinah Bakwena, being the incumbent, Makgonatsotlhe is the fourth.

Continue Reading

News

Opposition talks: Conveners ditched, experts engaged

13th October 2021

The much-anticipated opposition unity talks that will see Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) engage Botswana Patriotic Front (BPF), and Alliance for Progressives (AP) are expected to kick off any time from now.

According to informants, the talks, which were preceded by-elections negotiations, aim to be as inclusive as possible. As the talks start, the UDC, composed of Botswana National Front (BNF), Botswana Congress Party (BCP) and Botswana People’s Party (BPP), insist on retaining its preferred model of Umbrella; on the other hand, the BPF is proposing a PACT; and AP is in favour of an alliance model.

BPF is reportedly sceptical on the umbrella model and wants cooperation with the flexibility to allow other parties to join hands with UDC but without necessarily contesting elections using UDC symbols and colours.

BPF, which is currently the fastest-growing party, seems to be focused on self-actualization, self-preservation and securing institutional capacity in case of any political calamity. Although often profitable, cooperation politics can often leave individual political parties battered by political events and weakened beyond meaningful survival.

Discussions with some BPF members suggest that the party has big ambitions and harbour serious intentions of taking the BDP by its horns-all by itself-one day. “The position by some of our leaders is that the future of the UDC remains uncertain. The position and advice are that we should not put all our eggs in one basket. And the party elders think the pact model of cooperation is the safest under prevailing circumstances. Some, however, are worried that we should not overestimate our worth despite being the fastest-growing party in the country.

However, the matter is yet to be concluded once we receive the official invite,” revealed a BPF member of the NEC. Asked about the specifics of the pact idea, another high ranking party official revealed that the party Patron, Lt Gen Ian Khama and his brother Tshekedi Khama are among those who are for the election pact model.

BPF Spokesperson Lawrence Ookeditse has earlier this year told this publication that: “We have not settled on a model yet.” He also added that as a party, they are ready and willing to work with UDC, “but we will have our thoughts on how the cooperation or the talks should transpire, and they too will tell us their preference, and we will sit on the table to see how best to work together”.

AP heads into these negotiations with proposals of its own. On the model part, AP has expressed flexibility but want its partners to consider other models. AP believes that beyond the umbrella model, the coalition could also have a matrix to ensure that opposition parties select the best candidates for parliamentary and council seats.

AP, a splinter party of the beleaguered Botswana Movement for Democracy (BMD), asks for the constituencies allocated to BMD in the previous talks before it was kicked out on the eve of the 2019 elections.

AP, which garnered a popular vote of under 40 000 in the 2019 general elections, is confident that it brings tremendous value to the UDC, and state power could be within reach in 2024.
To reconcile the various interest of political parties, the leaders have agreed to engage political experts in a bid to arrive at the best decisions.

“There will be no conveners because parties in the past believed that they (conveners) took decisions on behalf of the constituent parties, though they are not representing any. So, the idea is to rope in political experts to direct UDC and the negotiating parties as to which path of cooperation model to follow,” a highly placed informant said this week.

UDC convener Lebang Mpotokwane has also defended the umbrella model in the past, noting that it creates fewer problems for the participants. The negotiations will be the fourth opposition cooperation talks since the 2009 elections. The opposition has held talks in 2011, 2012 and 2017. The 2012 talks resulted in Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC), which has been anchoring negotiations since then.

Continue Reading

News

‘Dingake’ name spoils Botswana’s interest in ILO top post

13th October 2021

When the Chairperson of the International Labour Organization (ILO) Governing Body invited member states to submit candidates for the vacant Director-General post for consideration, Botswana developed a keen interest.

It swiftly mobilized to beat the deadline, but the unions, upon consultation, nominated Justice Key Dingake as their preferred candidate, much to the government’s disappointment, who then decided to dump the whole issue altogether.

In accordance with the Rules governing the appointment of the Director-General and the decisions made by the Governing Body at its 341st and 342nd Sessions, the Chairperson of the Governing Body calls for candidates for appointment to the office of Director-General of the ILO through communication to all Governing Body members and all ILO Member States and candidatures must be submitted by a Member State of the ILO or by a regular or deputy member of the Governing Body.

The deadline for submission was on Friday, 1 October 2021, and candidatures were to be sent by postal or electronic mail to the following address to the Chairperson of the Governing Body.
This publication had established that when Cabinet sat to discuss the issue, it was resolved that the unions as key stakeholders should be consulted and requested to submit a name for consideration. They did and offered Justice Oagile Key Dingake-a distinguished scholar and labour law expert whose contribution to the country’s labour fraternity is unparalleled.

When asked this week to share their side of the story, the unions said they were first invited to partake in the process by the government but never got a response after they nominated judge Dingake as an ideal candidate.

“We sent our correspondence to the Minister of Employment, Labour and productivity, Mpho Balopi, with our suggested name being Justice Oagile Key Dingake, but since then we never got a response,” said unionist, Tobokani Rari who further expressed disappointment at how the government has handled the matter.

Rari said that while he would not want to impute any improper motives to anyone, the developments rekindled memories of the government’s hostility towards Judge Dingake, who has been forced by circumstances to take his skills and wealth of experience to the benefit of other countries. Balopi did not respond to questions sent to him and did not pick this publication’s calls at the time of going to press.

Cabinet insiders say Dingake’s name spoilt the party and dampened the spirits. “In the list of nominated names, he was the leading candidate, but I guess the powers that be could not imagine themselves campaigning for him and doing all they did for the Executive Secretary of SADC Secretariat, Elias Magosi.”

Dingake’s sin, observers say, has always been his progressive, independent mind and family’s political background, all of which have always stood in his way to progress to the country’s judicial ladder’s ends.

It is understood that also in the mix and preferred by the state was former Attorney General, judge, and now Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Botswana to the United Nations and other international organizations, Dr Athaliah Molokomme, who also has a background in human rights advocacy.

But insiders say many believed that the country should export Dingake to represent the country given his decorated experience and background. As a lawyer, Dingake represented 90% of Trade Unions in Botswana, drafted numerous Collective Labour Agreements, later presided overall trade disputes, including Collective Labour Agreements, and made determinations as Judge of the Industrial Court of Botswana.

Dingake has also written and lectured widely on trade, labour and human rights and holds numerous citations and awards for his work regarding peace, human rights, and social development. Had he contested and won, he would have been the first African to lead the ILO.

The ILO is built on the constitutional principle that universal and lasting peace can be established only if based on social justice. The ILO has been the source of such hallmarks of industrial society as the 8-hour day, maternity protection, child labour laws and a whole range of policies promoting workplace safety and peaceful industrial relations. Unique among UN organizations, the ILO has a tripartite structure involving governments, employers and workers.

ILO Director-General elections events lineup…

At its 341st (March 2021) and 342nd (June 2021) Sessions, the ILO Governing Body approved the following timetable for the appointment of the Director-General because the current term of office of the Director-General will come to an end on 30 September 2022:

1 July 2021: The Chairperson of the Governing Body calls for candidatures
1 October 2021: Last date for the reception of candidatures
A week in January 2022: The Chairperson of the Governing Body conducts interviews with candidates for the position of Director-General based on the format and principles contained in document GB.342/INS/6 and the guidance provided by the Governing Body at its 342nd Session
14-15 March 2022 (344th Session of the Governing Body): The Governing Body conducts candidate(s) hearings
25 March 2022 (344th Session of the Governing Body): The Governing Body conducts the ballot for the election of the Director-General
1 October 2022: The term of office of the Director-General commences.

Continue Reading

News

Botswana, EU clash over human rights issues 

13th October 2021
human-rights

Botswana and the European Union (EU) appear to have been at each other’s throats behind the scenes since last year, with the EU saying it held several meetings with Botswana to convince her to address human rights issues. 

This is contained in a 2020 Human Rights Report that reveals broad divisions in contentious issues boiling behind the scenes between Gaborone and the Union. According to the report, which was released recently, the EU says it “continues to follow closely three main human rights issues in Botswana: the application of the death penalty; the rights of LGBTI persons; and gender equality.”

“Botswana remains part of a small group of countries – in Africa and globally – which continue to retain the death penalty both in law and in practice. Three executions were recorded in 2020,” the report says. According to the report, the Botswana Government indicated that a public debate on the application of the death penalty should be part of its ongoing work towards developing a Comprehensive Human Rights Strategy and the related National Action Plan.

The report says further progress on the rights of LGBTI persons’ seen in 2019, when Botswana’s High Court decriminalised same-sex consensual relations, is still pending, subject to a final court decision over a government appeal.

“Finally, gender-based violence and the need to advance gender equality and women’s rights in society remain another challenge for the country. In response to the high incidence of gender-based violence – which has intensified in many countries during the current COVID-19 pandemic – the President and the First Lady launched a public campaign to fight gender-based violence and to promote equality,” the report says.

The report says the EU did not fold its arms and watch from the sidelines the human rights issues in question are concerned but confronted Botswana to have the contentious issue addressed. “The EU continued to engage with the Botswana Government, multilateral organisations, non-governmental organisations and the broader society in Botswana in three main areas: the death penalty, gender-based violence and empowerment of women, and rights of LGBTI persons, as well as on the support of media and implementation of Universal Periodic Review recommendations,” the report says.

The report says that in addition to ad hoc consultations and human rights-oriented outreach efforts, the EU engaged with the Botswana Government on human rights formally in the context of the Article 8 Political Dialogue, which took place in February 2020.

“The dialogue offered an opportunity to exchange views on EU’s and Botswana’s experiences concerning the three EU priority areas in Botswana (capital punishment, gender-based violence and rights of LGBTI persons) as well as other human rights challenges, while also exploring opportunities for EU-Botswana cooperation on human rights issues in the context of the EU-Africa partnership and at the multilateral level,” the report says.

In parallel to engagement with the government, the EU said it continued to maintain dialogue with representatives of civil society focusing on human rights and with UN organisations and other partners of the country.

“The EU continues to be the driving force behind the Gender Dialogue (in principle co-chaired with UN Women and the Gender Affairs Department in the Ministry of Immigration, Nationality and Gender), which brings together various stakeholders to discuss gender issues to chart a way forward regarding partnerships. The EU has also used public diplomacy efforts to stimulate broader dialogue in the country on human rights issues,” the report says.

The EU said it continued to provide financial support to projects funded through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, with activities focused primarily on helping Botswana tackle gender-based violence, strengthen the notion of gender equality in the country, and promote participation in political processes.

“With six projects already underway, the EU signed two new programmes, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, to support victims of gender-based and domestic violence and defend the rights of marginalised people, with a combined budget of EUR 430,000,” the report says. It says one of the projects is designed to offer care services to victims of gender-based violence and provide clinical services, counselling, shelter, and a referral system for legal and social assistance. Another project provides legal, medical and psychosocial support to refugees, undocumented migrants and indigenous people.

It says Botswana remains an important like-minded partner for the EU on the human rights agenda at a multilateral level. “The country’s positive role on human rights in the multilateral context would be further strengthened by initiating a domestic process of reflection about the signature and ratification of several pending core human rights conventions and/or optional protocols (e.g. the Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Optional Protocol of the Convention against Torture, etc.)” the report says.

But the report acknowledged that Botswana is a stable and well-established democracy with a legal framework and institutions designed to guarantee respect for human rights in society. It says human rights complaints are addressed by the courts, with the government accepting decisions and implementing relevant rulings.

“Although the media scene in the country is relatively undeveloped, the World Press Freedom Index has noted a further positive trend concerning the role of the media in society (as was also the case in 2019) and has improved Botswana’s ranking from 44th to 39th place (out of 180 countries),” the report says.  Meanwhile, this week, President Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi met with the EU delegation led by the managing director for Africa of the European External Action Services, Ms Rita Laranjinha.

 

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!