Connect with us
Advertisement

Khama, Botswana to headline ILO conference

An international body, Public Services International (PSI) is coming after government following recent developments with labour unions which they have termed as anti-workers rights prevailing in the country.

 

PSI is a global union federation of 669 public services trade union representing 20 million workers in 154 countries. It represents workers in social services, health care, municipal services, central government and public utilities.

 

In Botswana, recently, the Public Service Bargaining Council (PSBC) collapsed owing to persistent unilateral salary increments by government while negotiations were ensuing at the Council. This led to trade union party, Botswana Federation of Private, Public and Parastatal Workers Union, (BOFEPUSU) out of frustration, pulling out from the talks hence collapsing the Council.

 

Further, government is at an advanced stage of ensuring that the Public Service Bill becomes law, yet another step considered an endeavour by Khama’s government to trample on the workers’ rights. The bill essentially dis-empowers the PSBC and gives more power to the government through the Directorate of Public Service Management (DPSM) and Permanent Secretary to the President. The PSP has been given authority to undertake disciplinary actions.

 

Moreover, the government has, despite strong resistance by local trade unions, passed a controversial law at parliament, Trade Dispute Act, which essentially categorized the teaching services, state broadcasting services, veterinary services in the public service, diamond sorting, cutting and selling services, operational and maintenance services of the railways among others – as essential services.

 

Unions believe their categorization was a calculated move to deprive them of their own weapon against powerful employers – which is their right to strike. WeekendPost is in possession of a letter directed to head of Botswana government President Lt. Gen. Dr. Seretse Khama Ian Khama in which they highlight to him that the state of affairs concerning the workers’ rights in the country are upsetting to say the least. 

 

They therefore highlighted to him that Botswana and it’s trampling of workers’ rights issues will set the agenda at the International Labour Conference (ILC) next month in Geneva, Switzerland where hundreds of countries will partake.  

 

They state that: “PSI strongly believes that these developments are not only a cause for concern, but also an issue for action by the 106th International Labour Conference (ILC) in June 2017.” The General Secretary of PSI Rosa Pavanelli told Khama in the communiqué that PSI fully supports the complaint lodged about Botswana government to the impending 106th ILC sitting in June 2017, Geneva.

 

Pavanelli said the public service unions affiliating to PSI in Botswana, shall always confront any of the mentioned or identified challenges that infringe on the rights of their members, in any way whatsoever.

 

“In light of the various developments taking place in Botswana, particularly in reference to the public services, PSI has seen it fit to send a statement/open letter to the President of the country, His Excellency, Sir Seretse Khama on the issues,” she pointed out.

 

She continued to explain that the issues under dispute that put Botswana on the spotlight include the enactment of the Trade Disputes Act of 2016, the proposals for the amendments of the Public Service Act of 2008 and other developments taking place in the public services.

 

Pavanelli told Khama that she has been keenly following the developments taking place in the public services in Botswana over the enactment of the Trade Disputes Act (TDA) of 2016, the proposed amendments to the Public Services Bill of Botswana, and the culminating events informed by the posture of the Government of Botswana over the collective bargaining processes in the recent months.

 

She complained that “the proposed Public Service Bill amendments, which seek to amend the Public Service Act of 2008, have, amongst other things, provided for the unilateral appointment of the Secretary of the Public Service Bargaining Council by the President, and not by all the parties in the council; only limited to the employees of the Directorate of Public Service Management (DPSM).”

 

In the letter, she is gravely concerned that the PSBC is not involved in dispute resolution, “particularly since it is not clear what, in the absence of dispute resolution, will the function of the PSBC be, in line with the proposals of the bill”. Moreover, Pavanelli stated that the proposals to the bill provide for the conference of benefits on employees whilst negotiations are ongoing, something which seriously undermines and mocks the bargaining process in its entirety.

 

“These and other such proposals to the amendments to the bill remain problematic in the spirit of building industrial harmony and tranquillity. Furthermore, in all these proposed amendments, there is an apparent lack of commitment to provide rationality for these proposals, and to bring unions closer to such deliberations.”

 

Adding salt to injury, she explained that the recent court incidents over the PSBC and the proposed amendments to the Public Service Act of 2008 all show an apparently glaring shortage of commitment and sincerity from the Government of the Republic of Botswana to amicably resolve the outstanding matters of workers’ rights infringement in the public services.

 

According to the PSI General Secretary, this was raised following their prior correspondence, but no action has been taken. Instead, she said, they seem to witness an unabated, uninterrupted and consistent continuation of the process towards promulgating this bill into law soon, despite all the concerns raised.

 

Pavanelli noted that following the correspondence from the PSI Office on the 30th August 2016, directed to Khama’s office, there has been no change at all in relation to the commitment of the Government of Botswana to considering the concerns of public sector trade unions in the country over the enactment of the act.

 

“We also have a strong belief that since Botswana has ratified a majority of the core conventions, including Convention No.87 on the right to collective bargaining, and that Botswana is part of the ILO Governing Body, the Government of Botswana should ensure that it consistently upholds the rights enshrined in these conventions. We continue to reiterate this fact,” she stated.

 

“In that regard, Honourable President, PSI kindly brings the following to your attention: that we again call upon your government to open up for consultative, genuine and conclusive deliberations on both the TDA (2016) and the Public Service Bill Amendments in order to reinstate the confidence that has been eroded on the good faith by the Government of Botswana on all parties to the tripartite structure,” further reads the letter from Pavanelli. 

 

She added: “we shall consistently liaise with your office to ensure that legislative amendments are a process involving all tripartite structures in social dialogue format, so as to avoid unnecessary industrial tensions and unrest.” The PSI official also requested Khama’s government to desist from creating wedges between union and non-union members, as it would likely back fire in future.

 

Meanwhile BOFEPUSU had vowed to expose Botswana in the global stage, particularly at ILC, for infringement of workers’ rights which is likely to tarnish Botswana’s reputation as “a shining example of democracy” abroad.

Continue Reading

News

BONELA speaks on same-sex decriminalization case

18th October 2021
BONELA

In June 2019, a case involving the Attorney General was brought before the High Court, in which the applicant Letsweletse Motshidiemang challenged Sections 164 (a) and 167 of the Penal Code. The applicant contended that these sections are unconstitutional because they violate the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy. 

The applicant argued that these sections violated his right and freedom to liberty as he was subject to abject ignominy. These laws subjected the LGBTIQ community to brutal and debasing treatment through social control and public morality. On the 1st of November 2017, the Botswana High Court further allowed Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals of Botswana (LEGABIBO) to join the case as amicus curiae.

However, in July 2019, the respondents, in this case, i.e. the Government, filed an appeal against this iconic High Court ruling seeking re-criminalization of homosexuality. Human Rights Group has criticized this move of the Government all over the world.  The appeal was heard before five judges at the Court of Appeal on Tuesday. The State was represented by Advocate Sidney Pilane, while LEGABIBO and Letsweletse Motshidiemang were represented by Tshiamo Rantao and Gosego Rockfall Lekgowe, respectively.

Non-Governmental Organizations advocating for the LGBTIQ+ community joined the two parties at the Court of Appeal during this case. They argue that the minority group should enjoy their rights, especially the right to privacy and health. Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA) Chief Executive Officer, Cindy Kelemi says the issues being raised by LEGABIBO are that as individuals belonging to the LGBTIQ community, they have and must share equal rights, including the right to privacy, which also speaks to being able to involve in sexual activities, including anal sex.

“Those rights are framed within the constitution, and therefore a violation of any of those rights allow them to approach the courts and seek for redress. We do not need the law to be regulating what we do in the privacy of our homes. The law cannot determine how and when we can have sex and with who, so the law does not have any business in that context. What we are saying is that the law is violating the right to privacy,” she said on the sidelines of the decriminalization case in Gaborone on Tuesday.

The first case involving the homosexual act was the Utjiwa Kanane vs the State in 2003. Contrary to section 164(c) of the Penal Code, Kanane was charged with committing an unnatural offence and engaging in indecent practices between males, contrary to section 167. The conduct at issue involved Graham Norrie, a British tourist, and occurred in December 1994. (Norrie pleaded guilty, paid a fine, and left the country.)

Kanane pleaded not guilty, alleging that sections 164(c) and 167 both violated the constitution. The High Court ruled that these sections of the Penal Code did not violate the constitution. Kanane then appealed to the Court of Appeal. BONELA CEO recalls that in its judgment then, the High Court indicated, Batswana were not ready for homosexual acts. Twenty years later, the same courts are saying that Batswana are ready, she says.

“They gave the explicit example that shows that indeed Batswana are ready. There are policies and documents in place that accommodate people from marginalized communities and minority populations. The question now is that why is it hard now to recognize the full rights of an individual who is of the LGBTI community?” She further says intimacy is only an expression. The law that restricts homosexuality makes it hard for LGBTIQ members to express themselves in a way that affirms who they are.

“We want a situation where the law facilitates for the LGBTIQ community to be free and express themselves. The stigma that they face in communities is way too punitive. They are called names; some have been physically violated and raped at times. It shows that the law doesn’t not only prevent them from expressing themselves, it also exposes them to violence.” The law on its own, Kelemi submits, cannot change the status quo, adding that there is a need for more awareness and education on human rights and what it means for an individual to have rights.

“As it is now, it is very tough for some to do that because of a legal environment that is not enabling. We also want to see a situation where LGBTIQ+ people can access services and be confident that they are provided with non-discriminatory services. It is challenging now because health care providers, social workers and law enforcement officers believe that it is illegal to be homosexual. What we are saying is that if you have an enabling law, then that will facilitate for people to be able to express themselves, including accessing health services,” Kelemi said.

“As we are doing this advocacy work, one of the issues that we picked up is that there is lack of capacity, especially on the part of healthcare workers. We noted that when we provide services or mobilize Men who have sex with other men (MSM) to access health facilities, health care workers are not welcoming, forcing them to hideaway. We must put an end to this to allow these people the freedom that they equally deserve.”

Continue Reading

News

Masisi warns Gov’t officials

18th October 2021
President Masisi

The President, Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi, has declared as an act of corruption the attitude and practice by government officials and contractors to deliver projects outside time and budget, adding that such a practice should end as it eats away from the public coffers.

For a very long time, management problems and vast cost overruns have been the order of the day in Botswana, resulting in public frustrations. Speaking at the commissioning of the Masama/Mmamashia 100 Kilometres project this week, Masisi said: “There is a tendency in government to leave projects to drag outside their allocated completion time and budget. I want to stress that this will not be tolerated. It is an act of corruption, and I will be engaging offices on this issue,” Masisi said.

In an interview with this publication over the issue, the Director-General of the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC), Tymon Katholo, says, “any project that goes beyond its scope and budget raises red flags.” He continued that: “Corruption on these issues can be administrative and criminal. It may be because government officials have been negligent or been paid to be negligent by ignoring certain obligations or procedures. “This, as you may be aware has serious implications on not only of the economy but even the citizens who use these facilities or projects,” Katlholo said, adding that his agency is equally concerned.

According to the DCEC director, the selection, planning and delivery of infrastructure or projects is critical. In most cases, this is where the corruption would have occurred, leading to a troubled project. A public finance expert at the University of Botswana (UB), Emmanuel Botlhale, attributes poor project implementation to declining public accountability, lack of commitment to reforming the public sector, a decline in the commitment by state authorities and lack of a culture of professional project management.

In his research paper titled, ‘Enhancing public project implementation in Botswana during the NDP 11 period,’ Botlhale stated that successful implementation is critical in development planning. If there is poor project implementation, economic development will be stalled.
Corruption is particularly relevant for large and uncommon projects where the public sector acts as a client, and experts say Megaprojects are very likely to be affected by corruption. Corruption worsens both cost and time performance and the benefits expected from such projects.

Speaking during this week’s Masama/Mmamashia pipeline commissioning, Khato Civils chairman said Africans deserve a chance because they are capable, further adding that the Africans do not have to think that only Whites and Chinese people can do mega projects.  During his rule, former president Ian Khama went public to attack Chinese contractors for costing the government a move that ended up fuelling tensions between China and Botswana after Khama dispatched the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, Pelonomi Venson Moitoi, to China to register Botswana’s complaints with Chinese government-owned construction companies.  Botswana had approached the Chinese government for help in its marathon battle with Chinese companies contracted to build, among others, the failed controversial Morupule B power plant and refurbishment of Sir Seretse Khama International Airport (SSIK).

 

Continue Reading

News

Guma’s battle for millions of Pula give Court headache

18th October 2021
Guma Moyo

A legal battle between former Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) legislator Samson Moyo Guma and First National Bank (FNB) over a multimillion oil refinery project intensified this week with Justice Zein Kebonang referring the matter to Court of Appeal for determination.  The project belongs to Moyo Guma’s company called United Refineries which he has since placed under judicial management.

The war of words between Moyo Guma and FNB escalated after the company’s property worth millions of Pula were put up for sale in execution by the bank and scheduled to take place on 8th October. It emerges from Court papers that the bank had secured an order from the High Court to place the company’s property under the hammer.

Moyo Guma then also approached the High Court seeking among others that the public auction scheduled for 8th October 2021 be stayed. He contended that the assets that were to be sold belonged in reality to United Refineries and that as the company had been under judicial management at the time of the attachment, the intended sale in execution was unlawful.

He also sought the Court to declare that the writs of execution against the properties of guarantors and sureties of United Refineries Botswana Holdings Propriety Limited (the company) are unlawful.  Moyo Guma also sought a stay of the execution against the property known as Plot 43556 in Francistown, that is, the land buildings, plant and machinery which make up the property and any all immovable or movable property belonging to the guarantors and sureties of the company pending finalization of the winding up of United Refineries.

But FNB disputed Moyo Guma’s assertions and submitted that the properties in question belonged to TEC (Pty) Ltd and not United Refiners. TEC Pty Ltd which is one of the shareholders in United Refineries is one of the sureties and co-principal debtors of a debt amounting to P24 million owed by United Refineries to FNB.  FNB argued in papers that the properties belonged to TEC because it was TEC which had passed a covering mortgage bond in its favour over the property it now sought to execute.

Moyo Guma submitted that the covering mortgage bond passed in favour of FNB did not tell the full story as the property in question was in truth and fact owned by United Refineries and not TEC Pty Ltd. He maintained that the shares had been had been passed by the company in exchange for the properties in question and that the parties had always been guided by the spirt of the share agreement in dealing with each other despite delays in the change or transfer of ownership of plots 43556 and plot 43557 in Francistown.

Kebonang said it was clear to him that the two plots (43556 and 435570 belonged to United Refineries notwithstanding that TEC (Pty) Ltd had passed a mortgage bond over them in favour of FNB.  “For this reason the properties were immune from attachment or sale in execution so long as the judicial management order was in place,” he said.

The background of the case is that Moyo Guma together with five other investors, namely Elffel Flats (Pty) Ltd; Mmoloki Tibe; TEC (Pty) Ltd; Profidensico (Pty) Ltd and Tiedze Bob Chapi, each bound themselves as sureties and co-principal debtors in respect of a debt owed by a company called United Refineries Botswana Holdings (Proprietary) Limited (the Company), to First National Bank Botswana (FNBB) (1st Respondent).

FNB had extended banking facilities to the company in the amount of P24 million which was then secured through the suretyship of Moyo Guma and other shareholders.  Court records show that Moyo had on the 11th February obtained a temporary order for the appointment of a provisional judicial manager in respect of United Refineries and it was confirmed by the High Court on 24th September 2019.

In terms of the final court order by the High Court issued by Justice Tshepho Motswagole all judicial proceedings against the company, execution of all writs, summons and process were stayed and could only proceed with leave of Court. Court documents also show that First National Bank had sued the company and the sureties for the recovery of the debt owed to it and through a consent order, the bank withdrew its lawsuit against the company.

But FNB later instituted fresh proceedings against Moyo Guma and did not cite the company in its proceedings.  “There is no explanation in the record as to why the Applicant was now reflected as the 1st Defendant and why the company had suddenly been removed as the 1st Defendant. There was no application either for amendment or substitution by the bank,” said Justice Kebonang.

FNB had also argued that it sought to proceed to execute against Moyo Guma and other sureties on the basis of the suretyship they signed and that by signing the suretyship agreement, Moyo and other sureties had renounced all defence available to them and could therefore be sued without first proceedings against the principal debtor (United Refineries).  The question, Kebonang said, was that can FNB proceed to execute against Moyo Guma and other sureties on the basis of the suretyship contracts they signed?

“The starting point is that the Applicant (Moyo Guma) and others by binding themselves as sureties became liable for debts of the principal debtor and such liability is joint and several. He said the consequences of placing the company under judicial management means that every benefit extended to it should also extend to sureties.

“If the company is afforded more time to pay or its debt is discharged, reduced or compromised or suspended the obligation of sureties is to be likewise treated. It follows in my view that where judicial proceedings are suspended or stayed against the company, then any recourse against the sureties is similarly stayed or suspended,’ said Kebonang.

He added that “In the circumstances of this case, it seems to me that so long as the company is under judicial management, the moratorium that applies to it must also apply to its sureties/guarantors and no execution of the writs should be permitted against them. Any execution would be invalid.”

“Mindful that there is judicial precedent on this point in Botswana, at least none that I am aware of, and given its significance, I consider it prudent that the Court of Appeal must provide a determinative answer to the question whether a creditor can proceed against sureties where a company is under judicial management,” said Kebonang.

Pending the determination of the Court of Appeal, he issued the following order; the execution of writs issued in favour of FNB against Moyo and other sureties/guarantors of United Refinery are hereby stayed pending the determination of the legal question referred to the Court of Appeal.

Continue Reading
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!