The opposition Alliance for Progressives (AP) has insisted that they are not joining the Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) for now.
AP is a splinter party of the Botswana Movement for Democracy (BMD) which was borne as a result of a heated political power struggle inside the party between the soft spoken Ndaba Gaolathe and contentious Sidney Pilane. Gaolathe has since de-camped from the BMD to form AP while Pilane remained and underwent a subsequent congress that put him at the helm, following a disputed one at Bobonong which saw a loss of life.
The AP says that they have basically cut ties with the BMD and therefore since the party is now under the ambit of UDC (or have been accepted with the current leadership) – then by extension they equally dumped the UDC. Speaking to Weekend Post this week in an interview just outside parliament, AP Vice President, Wynter Mmolotsi although saying consultations are continuing, he confirmed that they will not join UDC with Pilane’s BMD in it. He stressed to this publication that: “with regard to the BMD group led by Pilane, Nehemiah Modubule, Gilbert Mangole, we have totally cut ties with them.”
On the talk about their hatred for Pilane at the UDC, Mmolotsi clarified that “it is not about an individual but about values. There is already a group led by Pilane (BMD) which has been co-opted in the UDC and therefore we are uncomfortable about that development.”
He maintained that: “well, of course we don’t want Pilane but that is not the real issue or only issue. Pilane’s values are not commensurate with ours. His outlook to democracy; his outlook to free and fair elections; and his outlook to human life are not on the same footing with ours. So it’s mostly the values and not more to do with him per se that we detest.”
The AP VP continued to state that one of the core values they believe is the sanctity of life, “we value life” he said adding that so if the current BMD believes that a person may be fought and to an extent of an alleged soul losing life then there is a problem.
“Our outlook to life is different. We also believe in free and fair elections and if you allow Pilane led BMD (with all what they have done at the Bobonong congress) into the UDC then it’s an endorsement and acceptance of what transpired at that bloody congress. It means the UDC shares those values of Pilane. That’s where we differ with UDC,” he highlighted.
Mmolotsi emphasised that they want a leadership that can be trusted. He said for them to take over government they should be trustworthy and honest in their dealings and not to find out that situation when they get in government. He said “assuming we take government with such caliber of people (under UDC), that cant it be that they may do the same at the national polls whereby electorates will find dogs and armed men with guns and maybe not allowed to vote, at the polling stations?” he asked rhetorically.
According to the AP Vice President, one of the basics of democracy which they value is free and fair elections and therefore they don’t want to join UDC just to meet the Pilane led BMD at UDC. “Then that would make us wonder what the reason for partying with them in the first place was,” Mmolotsi said.
AP wants UDC to leave BMD in the cold
As AP, Mmolotsi believes they can be a reconfiguration with political parties under UDC being Botswana Congress Party (BCP), Botswana National Front (BNF), Botswana Peoples Party (BPP) moving out the Umbrella leaving only the Pilane led BMD alone which he claims has few if not no members at all. He further claims all the BMD structures are now with AP and are busy building more. The Francistown West Member of Parliament (MP) also says the new umbrella of those parties can then be the AP since we are also an alliance.
“If some groups believe they share vision by the Progressives, they can de-camp from the contaminated UDC to join new AP. Everyone can join us not only political parties, whether they are church or anything. Those who believe in our vision and those who believe both BDP and UDC are in disarray. We want those people who are progressive,” the AP MP insisted.
Already there is strong speculation that the oldest opposition Botswana Peoples Party (BPP) and a national labour centre Botswana Federation of Public, Private and Parastatal Sectors Union (BOFEPUSU) are flirting with the new AP.
When quizzed on the allegations Mmolotsi said: “but we have not yet started courting BOFEPUSU, BPP or either of the like minded organizations and political parties and we have no time frame of this process. But we remain open to any configuration that can we get into in which there will be honesty.”
AP which also declared itself as an ‘alliance’ is expected to go in parallel with ‘Umbrella’ (UDC) in separate directions against the ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) at the national polls in just less than two years apart. On opposition cooperation and regime change…
On regime change, Mmolotsi justified that, even if Batswana want change through one opposition cooperation, but they cannot do so willy-nilly and without due diligence. “It’s possible that if Batswana feel that AP can be trusted more than BDP and UDC, they can take a decision that AP, as one political party, just like the BDP has been doing, can still win and also with the assistance of vote from those parties,” he asserted.
So to say that AP can’t win elections alone is not a fair judgement, things change, politics is very dynamic, 2019 elections will be different compared to the previous ones, the AP law maker told this publication. He observed that there are so many things that will influence the outcome like the type of leadership in the competing parties, political consciousness or awareness among Batswana, and as things unfold like the court case of Bakang Seretse’s money laundering matter, those who are involved will be influential in Batswana taking decisions on the basis of that.
“Already there are other Batswana who are very worried that do they continue with the current BDP like this or with the current UDC like that, with the inclusion of the new partner in the form Pilane led BMD, they are saying no they can’t vote for any of the two (UDC and BDP) and we believe we will be on the wings to tap that vote.”
The two time legislator gave an example of France’s President Emmanuel Macron who in almost one year, won the presidency of France after convincing the electorates satisfactorily swaying them to his new party, and “as AP we believe we can surprise many with only less than 2 years left before the next elections.”
According to Mmolotsi, when Batswana are fed up, when they want change, and no matter the circumstances, they will bring that change looking at the configuration of political parties and leaders and that if they don’t want change they will use the narrative of opposition parties contesting as one entity as a scape goat. He said they are ready to field all the 57 constituencies.
Botswana has made improvements on preventing and ending arbitrary deprivation of liberty, but significant challenges remain in further developing and implementing a legal framework, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention said at the end of a visit recently.
Head of the delegation, Elina Steinerte, appreciated the transparency of Botswana for opening her doors to them. Having had full and unimpeded access and visited 19 places of deprivation of liberty and confidentiality interviewing over 100 persons deprived of their liberty.
She mentioned “We commend Botswana for its openness in inviting the Working Group to conduct this visit which is the first visit of the Working Group to the Southern African region in over a decade. This is a further extension of the commitment to uphold international human rights obligations undertaken by Botswana through its ratification of international human rights treaties.”
Another good act Botswana has been praised for is the remission of sentences. Steinerte echoed that the Prisons Act grants remission of one third of the sentence to anyone who has been imprisoned for more than one month unless the person has been sentenced to life imprisonment or detained at the President’s Pleasure or if the remission would result in the discharge of any prisoner before serving a term of imprisonment of one month.
On the other side; The Group received testimonies about the police using excessive force, including beatings, electrocution, and suffocation of suspects to extract confessions. Of which when the suspects raised the matter with the magistrates, medical examinations would be ordered but often not carried out and the consideration of cases would proceed.
“The Group recall that any such treatment may amount to torture and ill-treatment absolutely prohibited in international law and also lead to arbitrary detention. Judicial authorities must ensure that the Government has met its obligation of demonstrating that confessions were given without coercion, including through any direct or indirect physical or undue psychological pressure. Judges should consider inadmissible any statement obtained through torture or ill-treatment and should order prompt and effective investigations into such allegations,” said Steinerte.
One of the group’s main concern was the DIS held suspects for over 48 hours for interviews. Established under the Intelligence and Security Service Act, the Directorate of Intelligence and Security (DIS) has powers to arrest with or without a warrant.
The group said the “DIS usually requests individuals to come in for an interview and has no powers to detain anyone beyond 48 hours; any overnight detention would take place in regular police stations.”
The Group was able to visit the DIS facilities in Sebele and received numerous testimonies from persons who have been taken there for interviewing, making it evident that individuals can be detained in the facility even if the detention does not last more than few hours.
Moreover, while arrest without a warrant is permissible only when there is a reasonable suspicion of a crime being committed, the evidence received indicates that arrests without a warrant are a rule rather than an exception, in contravention to article 9 of the Covenant.
Even short periods of detention constitute deprivation of liberty when a person is not free to leave at will and in all those instances when safeguards against arbitrary detention are violated, also such short periods may amount to arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
The group also learned of instances when persons were taken to DIS for interviewing without being given the possibility to notify their next of kin and that while individuals are allowed to consult their lawyers prior to being interviewed, lawyers are not allowed to be present during the interviews.
The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention mentioned they will continue engaging in the constructive dialogue with the Government of Botswana over the following months while they determine their final conclusions in relation to the country visit.
Standard Chartered Bank Botswana (SCBB) has informed the government that it will not be accepting new loan applications for the Government Employees Motor Vehicle and Residential Property Advance Scheme (GEMVAS and LAMVAS) facility.
This emerges in a correspondence between Acting Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Finance Boniface Mphetlhe and some government departments. In a letter he wrote recently to government departments informing them of the decision, Mphetlhe indicated that the Ministry received a request from the Bank to consider reviewing GEMVAS and LAMVAS agreement.
He said: “In summary SCBB requested the following; Government should consider reviewing GEMVAS and LAMVAS interest rate from prime plus 0.5% to prime plus 2%.” The Bank indicated that the review should be both for existing GEMVAS and LAMVAS clients and potential customers going forward.
Mphetlhe said the Bank informed the Ministry that the current GEMVAS and LAMVAS interest rate structure results into them making losses, “as the cost of loa disbursements is higher that their end collections.”
He said it also requested that the loan tenure for the residential property loans to be increased from 20 to 25 years and the loan tenure for new motor vehicles loans to be increased from 60 months to 72 months.
Mphetlhe indicated that the Bank’s request has been duly forwarded to the Directorate of Public Service Management for consideration, since GEMVAS and LAMVAS is a Condition of Service Scheme. He saidthe Bank did also inform the Ministry that if the matter is not resolved by the 6th June, 2022, they would cease receipt of new GEMVAS and LAMVAS loan applications.
“A follow up virtual meeting was held to discuss their resolution and SCB did confirm that they will not be accepting any new loans from GEMVAS and LAMVAS. The decision includes top-up advances,” said Mphetlhe. He advised civil servants to consider applying for loans from other banks.
In a letter addressed to the Ministry, SCBB Chief Executive Officer Mpho Masupe informed theministry that, “Reference is made to your letter dated 18th March 2022 wherein the Ministry had indicated that feedback to our proposal on the above subject is being sought.”
In thesame letter dated 10 May 2022, Masupe stated that the Bank was requesting for an update on the Ministry’s engagements with the relevant stakeholder (Directorate of Public Service Management) and provide an indicative timeline for conclusion.
He said the “SCBB informs the Ministry of its intention to cease issuance of new loans to applicants from 6th June 2022 in absence of any feedback on the matter and closure of the discussions between the two parties.” Previously, Masupe had also had requested the Ministry to consider a review of clause 3 of the agreement which speaks to the interest rate charged on the facilities.
Masupe indicated in the letter dated 21 December 2021 that although all the Banks in the market had signed a similar agreement, subject to amendments that each may have requested. “We would like to suggest that our review be considered individually as opposed to being an industry position as we are cognisant of the requirements of section 25 of the Competition Act of 2018 which discourages fixing of pricing set for consumers,” he said.
He added that,“In this way,clients would still have the opportunity to shop around for more favourable pricing and the other Banks, may if they wish to, similarly, individually approach your office for a review of their pricing to the extent that they deem suitable for their respective organisations.”
Masupe also stated that: “On the issue of our request for the revision of the Interest Rate, we kindly request for an increase from the current rate of prime plus 0.5% to prime plus 2%, with no other increases during the loan period.” The Bank CEO said the rationale for the request to review pricing is due to the current construct of the GEMVAS scheme which is currently structured in a way that is resulting in the Bank making a loss.
“The greater part of the GEMVAS portfolio is the mortgage boo which constitutes 40% of the Bank’s total mortgage portfolio,” said Masupe. He saidthe losses that the Bank is incurring are as a result of the legacy pricing of prime plus 0% as the 1995 agreement which a slight increase in the August 2018 agreement to prime plus 0.5%.
“With this pricing, the GEMVAS portfolio has not been profitable to the Bank, causing distress and impeding its ability to continue to support government employees to buy houses and cars. The portfolio is currently priced at 5.25%,” he said. Masupe said the performance of both the GEMVAS home loan and auto loan portfolios in terms of profitability have become unsustainable for the Bank.
Healso said, when the agreement was signed in August 2018, the prime lending rate was 6.75% which made the pricing in effect at the time sufficient from a profitable perspective. “It has since dropped by a total 1.5%. The funds that are loaned to customers are sourced at a high rate, which now leaves the Bank with marginal profits on the portfolio before factoring in other operational expenses associated with administration of the scheme and after sales care of the portfolio,” said the CEO.
The Global Gender Gap Index, a report published by the World Economic Forum annually, has indicated that Botswana is among countries that fare badly when it comes to representation of women in legislative bodies.
The latest Global Gender Gap Index, published last week, benchmarks the current state and evolution of gender parity across four key dimensions (Economic Participation and Opportunity, Educational Attainment, Health and Survival, and Political Empowerment). It is the longest-standing index which tracks progress towards closing these gaps over time since its inception in 2006.
This year, the Global Gender Gap Index benchmarked 146 countries. Of these, a subset of 102 countries have been represented in every edition of the index since 2006, further providing a large constant sample for time series analysis.
Botswana ranks number 66 overall (out of 146 countries), with good rankings in most of the pillars. Botswana ranks 1st in Health and Survival, 7th in the Economic Participation and Opportunity, 22nd in Educational Attainment, and 129th in Political Empowerment.
The Global Gender Gap Index measures scores on a 0 to 100 scale and scores can be interpreted as the distance covered towards parity (i.e. the percentage of the gender gap that has been closed). The cross-country comparisons aim to support the identification of the most effective policies to close gender gaps.
The Economic Participation and Opportunity sub-index contains three concepts: the participation gap, the remuneration gap and the advancement gap. The participation gap is captured using the difference between women and men in labour-force participation rates. The remuneration gap is captured through a hard data indicator (ratio of estimated female-to-male earned income) and a qualitative indicator gathered through the World Economic Forum’s annual Executive Opinion Survey (wage equality for similar work).
Finally, the gap between the advancement of women and men is captured through two hard data statistics (the ratio of women to men among legislators, senior officials and managers, and the ratio of women to men among technical and professional workers).
The Educational Attainment sub-index captures the gap between women’s and men’s current access to education through the enrolment ratios of women to men in primary-, secondary- and tertiary-level education. A longer-term view of the country’s ability to educate women and men in equal numbers is captured through the ratio of women’s literacy rate to men’s literacy rate.
Health and Survival sub-index provides an overview of the differences between women’s and men’s health using two indicators. The first is the sex ratio at birth, which aims specifically to capture the phenomenon of “missing women”, prevalent in countries with a strong son preference. Second, the index uses the gap between women’s and men’s healthy life expectancy.
This measure provides an estimate of the number of years that women and men can expect to live in good health by accounting for the years lost to violence, disease, malnutrition and other factors. Political Empowerment sub-index measures the gap between men and women at the highest level of political decision-making through the ratio of women to men in ministerial positions and the ratio of women to men in parliamentary positions. In addition, the reported included the ratio of women to men in terms of years in executive office (prime minister or president) for the last 50 years.
In the last general elections, only three women won elections, compared to 54 males. The three women are; Nnaniki Makwinja (Lentsweletau-Mmopane), Talita Monnakgotla (Kgalagadi North), and Anna Mokgethi (Gaborone Bonnington North). Four women were elected through Specially Elected dispensation; Peggy Serame, Dr Unity Dow, Phildah Kereng and Beauty Manake. All female MPs — save Dow, who resigned — are members of the executive.
Overall, Botswana has 63 seats, all 57 elected by the electorates, and six elected by parliament. Early this year, Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) secretary general and Gaborone North MP, Mpho Balopi, successfully moved a motion in parliament calling for increment of elective seats from 57 to 61. Balopi contented that population growth demands the country respond by increasing the number of MPs.
In Africa, Botswana play second fiddle to countries like Rwanda, Namibia, South Africa, Burundi, and Zimbabwe who have better representation of women, with Rwanda being the only country with more than 50 percent of women in parliament.
The low number of women in parliament is attributed to Botswana’s current, electoral system, First-Past-the-Post. During the 9th parliament, then MP for Mahalapye East tabled a motion in parliament in which she sort to increase the number of Specially Elected MPs in parliament to augment female representation in the National Assembly.
The motion was opposed famously, by then Specially Elected MP, Botsalo Ntuane, who said the citizens were not in favour of such a move since it dilute democracy, instead suggesting the Botswana should switch to Proportional-Representation-System. Botswana is currently undergoing Constitutional Review process, with the commission, appointed in December, expected to deliver the report to President Mokgweetsi Masisi by September this year.