Charismatic Botswana Congress Party (BCP) leader Dumelang Saleshando has stated that the opposition Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) in its current form cannot win elections in 2019 General Elections.
Saleshando emphasised to Weekend Post in an interview this week that the UDC should re-formulate if they are to compete effectively in the coming elections of which the voter registration exercise commences this week. He said: “we are about to get into voter registration period, which is possibly the most critical stage of the campaign, and one finds it difficult to answer questions from the members of the public as to whether registering with intention to vote the UDC is a worthwhile undertaking.”
The BCP leader continued to point out that “I think at the end of the day, the fact is that we took long not to admit to the problems and I don’t think there is anyone who can say it is well in the UDC – it is unwell. It’s got to be fixed. If it can’t be fixed lets present a plan B to the nation.” According to Saleshando the UDC should accept now that this platform called the UDC may not be the right vehicle for 2019 General Elections and accept that there is instability and that they must explore an option B.
He told this publication: “the option B should ensure that at the bare minimum we should have the BNF and the BCP as strategic partners under one formation for 2019. It should not be an exclusive BCP/BNF arrangement but rather that, to the greatest extent possible, include other formations which in our view would add value without de-stabilising.” In terms of the model he said they will cross the bridge when they get there.
Saleshando: the nations is frustrated by the UDC tricks
The BCP leader continued: “I am genuinely frustrated by the impasse we find ourselves in. I am genuinely concerned about it. I even got people asking us whether the decision to join the UDC was really the right one.” “But I think we shouldn’t be asked such questions but they are being asked because the BMD leadership in particular is placing a number of bobby traps or roadblocks that make it difficult for the UDC,” Saleshando pointed out.
“We are not even walking; we are kraaling to 2019, as things stand. And I think our nation shares this frustration that we have long wanted an alternative and the opposition seems determined to deny us the alternative we need.” He added, “One can only say, maybe out of this dark cloud, and within the time remaining we can find a silver lining. But I think steps need to be taken.” So all these really point to the need for the opposition to get all its act together, he asserted.
UDC lost support of labour movements
The former two time Gaborone Central legislator also observed that there is too much animosity in the UDC to the extent that it has lost a critical partner in the labour movement. He observed: “Botswana Federation of Public, Private and Parastatal Sectors Union (BOFEPUSU) it appears to me they have walked away quietly and that Botswana Movement for Democracy (BMD) President Sidney Pilane talked about them and they dismissed him out rightly – which was more revealing.” According to Saleshando, the current UDC doesn’t even have the confidence of people that supported it in 2014 and chances are it may not do well at the next polls.
Saleshando’s position on BMD leader Sidney Pilane
Saleshando described Pilane as thus: “the facts speak for themselves. The issue of Pilane has broken hearts, lost hopes. If you follow Pilane’s footsteps, you will see a trail of broken hearts, broken dreams, broken aspirations; it’s a broken record, starting with the BMD, BMD Youth league, not even sure if there is BMD Women’s league to talk of under his leadership.”
Also in the UDC, the BCP President continued: “you will see a bloody trail; you will see blood stains everywhere there is Pilane or where he has walked with the UDC. The glory days that we had before he came on board, of those massive rallies, where there was new hope are no more.”
We now have or rather say the glory days are now replaced with what we saw in Gabane, Saleshando said adding that Pilane has now turned the UDC into World Wrestling Federation (WWF) and that he is forever happy to be called when there is another show of opportunity for muscles by one comrade on another.
According to the BMD leader, truth be told, in politics one of the things you really need is integrity but “I don’t think the BMD leadership brings that integrity that we need in the UDC.” People ask me everyday gore naare le isa kae Pilane? Meaning people ask why Pilane is still part of them in the UDC, he said.
“Pilane’s attitude can be understood to be in the context of the fact that he leads a party that split. And because he knows that organizationally he has been severely weakened. His aggression may be a strategy to avoid questions being asked about the BMD. But again we may choose to ignore that but in ignoring it; we are going to have a repeat of Moshupa by election.”
In Moshupa Saleshando said the BNF tried to appeal to the BMD that they have strong numbers and asked them to stand but they refused and went on to lose the area. So he believes the weakest link was presented as the face of the UDC and cautioned that if they continue like that, Moshupa will be replicated in a number of areas.
Saleshando also highlighted that the BMD leader has shown determination in taking steps to undermine UDC president Duma Boko’s leadership especially in terms of the contentious issue of UDC constitution. He said: “I think it says a lot and I think Batswana will ask whether the UDC government will perform if given the mandate to rule if a subordinate (Pilane) undermines the UDC president and it becomes business as usual.”
Certainly, Saleshando pointed out that it is that kind of culture that is foreign to BCP; even the inaction by the UDC leaders is totally foreign to them. He said nonetheless they accept that in a coalition there is a shared space and one cannot impose their preferred way of doing things but hopes they will be able to impress upon other UDC colleagues on the need to “act” on some of the things before they got more toxic.
BCP leader speaks about Ndaba and AP
The UDC Vice President said he has not worked much with Ndaba Gaolathe, but when he looks at the public perception, which is very critical in the same way as the fact that the public is suspicious of Pilane; the public, it appears to him, does trust Ndaba. “I think we better with AP’s Ndaba than with the BMD so unfortunately with the benefit of working with the current BMD, there would add the spark that we need. I do think he has talents that the opposition needs,” he said.
He also pointed out that, so, whether by walking away from the UDC was necessary or not shouldn’t be an issue really, as it amounts to crying over spilled milk. So the question should be can those talents be part of the reformulation that we need for 2019, and we need that reformulation, and so I think yes we do, he emphasised.
In the same token, Saleshando pointed out that the AP also needs to reflect, and do self introspection, as it’s not enough for them to say they were right on Pilane. “That alone cannot get them the votes. The reality of it is that the electoral system that we using will dissipate AP in 2019 should it stand alone, it may not survive beyond 2019. Politics is not a sprint but a marathon and how you run it is critical. Batswana are not looking for prophets on who was right on Pilane but they are looking for combined opposition that can offer alternative to the BDP. We also knew about Pilane’s track record.”
BDP is at its weakest, UDC should capitalise
On the BDP, Saleshando said the party is at its weakest point. “We can say it (BDP) presents what we can call mana from heaven for the opposition. It’s not the first time in the BDP that there are many casualties in primary elections as the members of cabinet just suffered. The message by Batswana is that they have lost confidence in the BDP leadership, and it’s a strong message countrywide particularly as most of them were on the first terms in parliament when they lost,” Saleshando asserted.
He also said that, more worse is that the BDP is going into the coming elections with a grumpy former president Lt. Gen. Ian Khama, a former president who want to be treated as a sitting president, and wants to co-pilot with the sitting president in the cockpit. “He wants full access to OK 1 (official aircraft) and military planes. But like I said before, this is a case of chickens coming home to roost for the BDP as they created Khama. They are reaping what they have sown all these years and my response is that so ‘let them lie on the bed they prepared.’”
On Masisi, he also attacked him saying he is simply a beneficiary of an undemocratic system whereby one person elects his preferred president on our behalf adding that “I am not even sure if Masisi would have been anywhere in the race if it was purely a democratic race.” According to Saleshando, even though it cannot be justified he said he can understand why Khama is an unhappy man at the moment because of Masisi.
“Khama is possibly thinking that Masisi was totally unknown and irrelevant when he fought for his victory in 2014 and that he catapulted him, while he was a political novice and politically malnourished, and went on to make him Vice President and Chairman. Then now he uses the energy he secured for BDP victories to reverse everything he did. I am not saying is justification but it maybe what going though Khama’s mind now,” he said. He also said Masisi should take stern action on Khama and not play naïve or ‘hear or see no evil’ when the clearly the former president is bringing down his lieutenants.
President Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi and the Directorate of Intelligence (DIS) came under the lens of the United Nations Human Rights Committee during the just ended dialogue between committee members and the Botswana delegation.
Scores of issues, among them the country’s reports on topics including whether Masisi abused the State of Emergency Act during the COVID-19 pandemic and alleged surveillance and harassment of members of the public by DIS, were addressed at the session.
A Committee expert asked about legislation in the Penal Code allowing the Government to investigate people who expressed opinions against public figures, particularly the President. How many cases were there of journalists who had been investigated, prosecuted and tried? Concerning the COVID-19 Emergency Powers Act, there was a provision for a fine or a five-year jail term for journalists using “source(s) other than the Director of Health Services or the World Health Organization” when reporting on COVID-19. The Committee Expert asked for the number of cases and other measures taken under this Act.
Another committee expert wanted to know that the scale and scope of electronic surveillance, which had sharply increased in recent years, was concerning. Furthermore, the Committee was troubled at the lack of a sufficient independent oversight mechanism over the Directorate of Intelligence and Security Services that reportedly had contributed to a growing climate of fear and chilling effect on journalists, human rights defenders and opposition politicians. In this respect, a Committee Expert asked about the measures taken by Botswana during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure that the right to privacy was protected (collection and management of personal data).
The Expert also enquired about a database website, which was not functioning but was supposed to contain documents of Botswana’s international human rights commitments. In terms of the freedom of assembly, while the Constitution of the State party guaranteed it, the Committee had received information that, in practice, the Public Order Act required citizens to apply to the nearest police for a permit to hold an assembly, and police had sometimes denied requests for unclear reasons.
The Committee Expert asked if the Public Order Act of the State party had been applied in conformity with those tests. Would the State party indicate the measures it had taken and/or intended to take to make the application of the law in question strictly compatible with the requirements under article 21? Furthermore, the Committee had also received allegations that police officers sometimes used force to compel gathering people to disperse. In this regard, the Expert asked for information on legal provisions and practical guidelines under which police officers may resort to force and any training programme if any, for police and other law enforcement officers to respect and ensure the right of peaceful assembly.
A Committee Expert asked about cases of holding people for longer periods under pre-trial detention than the maximum period provided for in legislation, 36 months, instead of six. Were there any plans to shorten the duration of pre-trial detention in legislation? The Committee noted that there was no provision for local community broadcasting. What measures were the State party taking to ensure that the local communities could also communicate in their language in the media?
What measures had been undertaken by Botswana to increase sustainable development in the country regarding climate change in particular. What efforts had been undertaken to ensure that customary courts worked up to speed? A Committee Expert asked about children in rural areas who travelled a long way to their schools. The delegation was asked about the independence of the Ombudsman Office, including provisions for appointing the Ombudsman. What budget was envisaged for this Office?
The Expert acknowledged the established procedures and institutions for anti-human trafficking but expressed concerns about the lack of reported cases. The Expert asked about the accountability of the public prosecution, as well as the intelligence services. Replying, the Botswana delegation, led by Presidential Minister Kabo Morwaeng, said there was an ongoing consultation for revising provisions that would ensure better protection for journalists and media freedom in Botswana.
Still, the delegation said, freedom of expression was assured in the State party without any restrictions, including in Parliament. There was an education programme providing the opportunity for children in primary school to be taught in their mother tongue. It also explained that the Ombudsman would be dealing with issues of human rights promotion and protection.
“National policies and procedures were envisaged to control the distribution of natural resources. Botswana was also taking measures to increase the access of minority groups to education. Regarding pre-trial detention, the delegation explained that the criminal procedure assured justice was preserved in the country,” said the delegation.
On the issue of torturer and alleged use of unreasonable force on suspects, the Botswana delegation explained that police officers were trained to use minimal force, ensuring that human rights were preserved, including in the cases of assemblies. On the use of surveillance, no legal provisions were breached, and such measures were used in accordance with national legislation. Legal aid was very costly, and it was not possible to keep the record in detail as asked by the Committee.
Morwaeng told the Committee that the Government maintained a robust consultative approach to policy development and legislative process. He said this was a system of governance that ensured that the voices of ordinary citizens were respected and taken into account in the social, economic and political process that affected them the most, giving full effect to the full enjoyment of human rights across the board. The delegation took due note of the views of the Committee, including the importance of harnessing information technology to give a broader appreciation of the provisions of the Covenant.
The P1 billion water project launched by President Dr vMokgweetsi Masisi this week is said to be critical to the success of key projects planned in Lobatse – the Lobatse Milk Afric and Leather Park. After commissioning the multi-million Pula Masama-Mmamashia water project last week following its completion, on Thursday, Masisi performed ground-breaking ceremony of yet another major water project, the Lobatse Water Supply Master Plan (LWSMP1).
The water project was conceptualized in 2009 to address water shortage in areas along the Greater Gaborone zone. These areas include Ramotswa, Otse, Mogobane, Mankgodi, Manyana, Goodhope, Lekgolobotlo, Mmathethe, Molapowabojang and villages surrounding. It was said that some major upcoming projects in Lobatse such as Lobatse Leather Park, Milk Afric and the Pioneer Border Gate are dependent on the success of this project, in order for them to take off and operate effectively. The two projects have been struggling to take-off despite government having put the necessary resources.
The Lobatse Leather Park is anticipated to create about 4700 jobs at the initial stage and 7000 jobs at full capacity. The project entails the development of a complex for different tanneries with the support of state-owned beef company, Botswana Meat Commission. It will comprise primary infrastructure such as a common effluent treatment plant, sewage treatment plant, and others.
When operational, the park is expected to supply the private sector with hides and skins, raw to finished leather tanneries, and the manufacturing of different leather products. These products include shoes, belts, jackets, and others, thereby playing an instrumental role in stimulating economic activity. Leather Beneficiation Park is seen as important for the leather industry as it would ensure that Botswana moves from exporting raw leather to finished leather goods. It is said research has established that there are plenty of hides and skins in the country from the three million cattle and 1.8 million goats.
Meanwhile, Milk Afric dairy farm project which was expected to be complete by the second half of 2018, is in the wilderness after the initial partnership between Botswana Development Corporation (BDC) and Milk Afric failed to bear fruits. BDC has been searching for a new partner for the project. Once fully operational, the farm will produce a total of 21.9 million litres or one third of the national milk demand, which is 65 million litres a year. At present, Botswana imports over 58.8 million litres from South Africa at a cost of P345 million annually.
The P120 million project is a Public Private Partnership deal between Lobatse Town Council (LTC), with 10 percent shareholding through leasing its 1375.4 ha farm for 25 years; and 26 percent (P40 million) by Botswana Development Corporation (BDC). When speaking at the groundbreaking ceremony held in Ramotswa, Masisi said, in addition to improving the water supply for domestic needs and livelihoods, this infrastructural development will facilitate major projects in the Lobatse region, which are critical to the ailing, old town.
“Our objective as a country is to align developments with the National Vision 2036 Pillar 3 on Sustainable Development, which recognizes water as a very scarce resource which requires strategic management by key players.” Botswana is a developing country with an increasing population, Masisi said, adding that an increase in population naturally causes exponential growth in the demand for water. This is a reality that Botswana is faced with and challenged to address for sustainable water supply, the President said.
He indicated that this is why they are continuously witnessing major water projects undertaken by government, in collaboration with key partners. “Gaborone and surrounding areas have been experiencing an acute water supply deficit due to infrastructure that has outlived its potential to meet the growing demand for water by citizens. This particular project entails the construction of a Pump Station at Forest Hill in Gaborone, a 57 kilometre pipeline from Gaborone to Lobatse and a new Northern reservoir.”
The project, awarded China State Construction and Engineering Corporation/Van and Truck Hire Joint Venture at over P1 billion, is currently at 49% of its completion stage. There are 637 jobs created by this water project. “The transmission pipeline will convey 63 million litres of water a day from Gaborone to Lobatse. This is a great improvement compared to an average supply of 14 million litres of water that has been supplied to Lobatse, Borolong and surrounding areas,” Masisi said.
The United Nations Committee on Human Rights has taken Botswana to task over what it considers to be discrimination laws against lesbians and gays and delay in prosecuting suspects in the infamous Sebina defilement case. The Botswana delegation led by Presidential Minister Kabo Morwaeng found itself against the wall before the United Nations Human Rights Committee of experts in Geneva, Switzerland.
First to take Botswana head-on was the UN Committee member, C SOH, who noted that the recent ruling of the High Court pays particular attention to the penal code penalising same-sex sexual conduct as it found that it infringed on the constitutional rights, dignity, liberty and privacy of the LGBTI persons (lesbians and gays). “Nonetheless, I note with deep concern that those discriminatory provisions of the of the penal code remain in effect and regrettably the government stated in its periodic review before deciding whether or not to repeal section 164 it would still await the final determination of the court of appeal in the case of Motshidiemang vs State,” said Soh.
According to Soh, “This statement makes us cast doubt on the will of the government to vigorously” strike out section 164, which criminalises sex between people of the same sex. “In this respect, I would like to ask the delegation to explain what the intended goal by the government was when it filed an appeal against the unconstitutionality ruling of the High Court,” he said. Soh said the Botswana Government had also explained that no persons had been convicted under this provision, section 164, ever since the penal code was enacted.
“However, media reports indicate that in August 2016, the government of a Gaborone Magistrate Court sentenced a man three years in prison who had been charged and convicted under section 164 for engaging in unnatural acts. Can the delegation explain these discrepancies relating to persons who have been convicted and sentenced under section 164 of the penal code,” he said. He also wanted the Botswana delegation to explain how the government addresses how customary courts have been discriminating against LGBTI persons.
Another member of the UN Committee, Duncan Muhumuza, expressed concern that the Directorate of Public Prosecution (DPP) has taken more than four years to prosecute suspects in the Sebina saga in which a councillor was alleged to have slept with a student who was also a minor. Replying to concerns raised by the UN experts, Mogakolodi Segwagwa, chief state counsel at the Attorney General Chambers, noted that one of the UN committee members has “become fearful that the fact that government appealed the case could be a sign that there is lack of will or doubt on the part of the government as to abolishing or outlawing of same-sex relations.”
“But I would like to assure the panel that Botswana has over the years proved itself at all times to be compliant with court orders. There are many examples I could put forward where the government had to make sure that court orders were executed. That is the assurance I can give out to the committee,” said Segwagwa. He said there was a good reason for appealing the decision of the High Court in which it outlawed section 164.
“This was a High Court decision, and as you know in our jurisdiction when a judge is at the same court with his brothers and his sisters and fellow judges, whatever decision he puts out so far as that particular court is concerned, it is not law because it is not binding on his fellow brothers and sisters and it is not binding on fellow judges,” explained Segwagwa. He added that “It is merely persuasive so much so that some other judges may choose to when a similar case comes before him or her, depart and ignore the position that that particular judge espoused, and he or she can do so with ease.”
Segwagwa further explained that “There was a very pressing need for this matter to be appealed to the Court of Appeal for purposes of crystalising the law and for purposes of ensuring that if there is any aspect of the law that the High Court had overlooked in arriving at this particular decision, then such an aspect can be taken into consideration by the Court of Appeal.” “So we are waiting for that judgement, and once it comes, it will be implemented. I take it that the committee would like the Court of Appeal to uphold the decision below and strike out this particular section.”
He assured the UN experts that when the High Court struck out section 164 in 2019, the country did not erupt into violence, adding that this was an “indication that we don’t have anything against people of LGBT. They are our brothers and sisters, and we co-exist with them.” Regarding the Sebina saga, Segwagwa said the painful case “where this councillor was said to have had sexual intercourse with a child is the police dealt with a matter as it is the law and we all know that the police are bound by their Act to do so without fear and prejudice.”
He said Upon completion of their investigation, “the matter was handed over to the prosecuting authority, as Mr Muhumuza had indicated, it has been four years and we concede that four years is a long time and that it is unreasonably a long time and that it defeats the whole adage that justice should be sweetest and freshest so much so that the case needed to be speeded along.”
He added that “But the problem we have which is not a problem in the sense of it being a problem, but the impediment we have in the sense that the Constitution created the Office of the Director of Prosecutions under section 51 subsection A and if you go to that particular section and you read subsection six, the director shall not be subjected to the control of another authority.”
Segwagwa said, “this is the section that was inserted in this constitution to safeguard the independence of the Director of DPP to ensure that he or she prosecutes matters without fear, favour and prejudice and it presents impediment where we can’t try and say to the DPP, go and register or indicate your position now, tomorrow or next year and that is why it has taken all this time, but we believe attempts are being made that it finds its way to the court.”