Bakang Seretse’s attorney in the on-going multi-million National Petroleum Fund (NPF) money laundering case, Kgosietsile Ngakaagae, has subpoenaed President Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi, his predecessor Lt Gen Dr Ian Khama and other senior government officials to explain to court their role in the case.
Among senior officials that have been called to court are: former Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC) Rose Seretse; director of DCEC Bruno Paledi; Deputy Director Operations DCEC Eugene Wasetso; Permanent Secretary to the President Cater Morupisi; former minister of Presidential Affairs, Governance and Public Administration Eric Molale; former minister of Minerals Sadique Kebonang; former Acting Permanent Secretary at Minerals Dr. Obolokile Obakeng and Director Finance Directorate on Intelligence and Security Moipedi Nkoane.
Ngakaagae served the Attorney General’s Chambers, Directorate of Public Prosecutions and DCEC with the documents last week. Ngakaage states on his papers that, “We remind that at the last hearing of this matter before Judge Godfrey Radijeng, we made the point that there are disputes of fact in this matter. Accordingly, we communicated to the honourable court and to yourselves, that there is no way the matter can be justiciably resolved unless there was a full blown trial and until all state actors relevant to the issue were called to give evidence and subjected to examination,” he stated on the papers.
“Such disputes relate to the quaere, as to whether the amounts and assets subject of the restraining order are in fact proceeds of crime such that they could be liable to forfeiture.” He has also requested the said parties to confirm if they can have a consent order for a full-blown trial or whether there will be a need to make an application for the same. “In the event of your objection to a full-blown trial, application shall be made for the dismissal of the matter on account of resoluble disputes of fact.
“We advise that the evidence of the witnesses will settle several issues including the alleged conspiracy between clients and Kerekang; the alleged breach of procurement process, the existence of any guilty intention on the various actors, the disputed version by Kgosi in so far as it relates to clients, State ownership of the project And its funding and selective justice among others.”
Dr Ian Khama
According to Ngakaagae, Khama is the only authority to which former Director DIS, Isaac Kgosi reported. “As such it is important to know of all relevant between the same in so far as the expenditure is concerned. It shall be required that the Office of the President produce all documentation that was ever generated or that is in their custody regarding the expenditure.”
Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi
President Masisi will be required to testify on his knowledge of the transaction as Vice President to the now retired Khama. And to any meetings he may have attended regarding the transaction and matters incidental thereto.
She is said to have attended a stakeholder briefing on September 18, 2017 with Kebonang, Obakeng, Bakang and Kenneth Kerekang.
Paledi is expected to testify as to when he first got to know about the contract between the DIS and Dignia Systems-the Israel Company. He will also be called to explain as to why the key State actors in Kgosi, Sadique and Obakeng were not subjected to the same treatment as Bakang and his co-accused Botho Leburu and Kenneth Kerekang. “He is relevant for testing the genuiness of the DCEC conspiracy claims.
To produce all material relevant to the case recovered from the DIS or any other government department,” states the document. “He will confirm he indeed ever visited Briscoe Attorneys whereat he requested for the disposal of legal files in so far as such related to the case. And to further explain the full extent of investigations regarding any benefit that may have accrued to any person regarding the amounts in issue.”
He is expected as the head of civil service and secretary to cabinet, the extent, if any, to which cabinet knew about the expenditure. Ngakaagae also requires him to produce all documentation received by his office. Regarding the transaction and further to all discussions regarding the matter. “He will further be required to testify on why, if at all, Kgosi was ever reprimanded or punished for the alleged expenditure and its status in so far as it obtained under the then administration.”
As the then minister to which security agencies including the DIS report, he is expected to testify fully on all matters regarding the transaction and expenditure.
As the former minister for the ministry to which the funds were sourced, he is alleged to have authorised the variation of the funds in dispute. He is best placed to speak on the genesis of the procurement from strategic fuel storage reserves to the ultimate expenditure-according to Ngakaagae.
She is required to answer on all meetings that she attended with clients regarding the transaction and disbursements as the DIS director Finance.
Dignia System representative will answer on the procurement aspect of the project and all matters incidental thereto and delivery status; To explain the relationship between the DIS and his company and the delivery status of the current contract. Last week, Kgosi, was warned and cautioned by the DCEC as a suspect and is expected to appear arraignment before the court on the same matter soon.
Initially, Kgosi was to be a star witness for the state against his alleged co-accused Bakang, Botho Leburu and Kenneth Kerekang before the then Regional Magistrate Christopher Gabanagae at the Broadhurst Magistrate Court. They were arraigned before court last year December.
Botswana Police Service (BPS) has indicated concern about the ongoing trend where the general public falls victim to criminals purporting to be police officers.
According to BPS Assistant Commissioner, Dipheko Motube, the criminals target individuals at shopping malls and Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) where upon approaching the unsuspecting individual the criminals would pretend to have picked a substantial amount of money and they would make a proposal to the victims that the money is counted and shared in an isolated place.
“On the way, as they stop at the isolated place, they would start to count and sharing of the money, a criminal syndicate claiming to be Criminal Investigation Department (CID) officer investigating a case of stolen money will approach them,” said Motube in a statement.
The Commissioner indicated that the fake police officers would instruct the victims to hand over all the cash they have in their possession, including bank cards and Personal Identification Number (PIN), the perpetrators would then proceed to withdraw money from the victim’s bank account.
Motube also revealed that they are also investigating a case in which a 69 year old Motswana woman from Molepolole- who is a victim of the scam- lost over P62 000 last week Friday to the said perpetrators.
“The Criminal syndicate introduced themselves as CID officers investigating a case of robbery where a man accompanying the woman was the suspect.’’
They subsequently went to the woman’s place and took cash amounting to over P12 000 and further swindled amount of P50 000 from the woman’s bank account under the pretext of the further investigations.
In addition, Motube said they are currently investigating the matter and therefore warned the public to be vigilant of such characters and further reminds the public that no police officer would ask for bank cards and PINs during the investigations.
Botswana Congress Party (BCP) leadership walked out of Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting this week on account of being targeted by other cooperating partners.
UDC meet for the first time since 2020 after previous futile attempts, but the meeting turned into a circus after other members of the executive pushed for BCP to explain its role in media statements that disparate either UDC and/or contracting parties.
The Director General of the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crimes (DCEC), Tymon Katlholo’s spirited fight against the contentious transfers of his management team has forced the Office of the President to rescind the controversial decision. However, some insiders suggest that the reversal of the transfers may have left some interested parties with bruised egos and nursing red wounds.
The transfers were seen by observers as a badly calculated move to emasculate the DCEC which is seen as defiant against certain objectionable objectives by certain law enforcement agencies – who are proven decisionists with very little regard for the law and principle.